[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views8 pages

Lecture 2 - Part 1

The document discusses the history and limits of nanotechnology. It covers topics like Richard Feynman's 1959 talk where he proposed building things at the nanoscale. It also discusses Moore's law and the limits of making things smaller due to the atomic scale. The document compares top-down and bottom-up approaches for nanofabrication.

Uploaded by

aht.m.s
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views8 pages

Lecture 2 - Part 1

The document discusses the history and limits of nanotechnology. It covers topics like Richard Feynman's 1959 talk where he proposed building things at the nanoscale. It also discusses Moore's law and the limits of making things smaller due to the atomic scale. The document compares top-down and bottom-up approaches for nanofabrication.

Uploaded by

aht.m.s
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

12/02/2014

Lecture 2
Background
Limits to smallness
Introduction to micro/nanofabrication

History of nanotechnology
• 2000 Years Ago – Sulfide nanocrystals used by Greeks and Romans
to dye hair
• 1000 Years Ago – Gold nanoparticles of different sizes used to
produce different colours in stained glass windows
• 1959 – “There is plenty of room at the bottom” by R. Feynman
• 1974 – “Nanotechnology” - Taniguchi uses the term nanotechnology
for the first time
• 1981 – IBM develops Scanning Tunnelling Microscope
• 1985 – “Buckyball” - Scientists at Rice University and University of
Sussex discover C60
• 1986 – “Engines of Creation” - 1st nanotechnology book by Eric Drexler.
Atomic Force Microscope invented by Binnig, Quate & Gerbe
• 1989 – IBM logo made with individual atoms
• 1991 – Carbon nanotube discovered by S. Iijima
• 1999 – “Nanomedicine” – 1st nanomedicine book by R. Freitas

1
12/02/2014

There is plenty of room at the bottom


Richard Feynman
Problem of manipulating and controlling things on a small scale
It is my intention to offer a prize of 1,000 dollars to the
first guy who can take the information on the page of a
book and put it on an area 1/25,000 smaller in linear
scale in such manner that it can be read by an electron
microscope.
And I want to offer another … of another 1,000 dollars to
the first guy who makes an operating electric motor - a
rotating electric motor which can be controlled from the
outside and, not counting the lead-in wires, is only 1/64
inch cube.

Nanoscale

2
12/02/2014

Nanomaterial dimension

Electron in

Quantum box

Quantum wire

Quantum well

Moore’s law Core i3,i5,i7


Core 2

Moore‟s law states the complexity of an


integrated circuit, with respect to minimum
component cost, will double in about 18 months.

Minimum feature size


Pentium 4: 180 nm  90 nm
Pentium D: 90 nm  65 nm
Core 2: 65 nm  45 nm

3
12/02/2014

Semiconductor technology roadmap

Nodes are at 32 nm (2010), 22 nm (2012), 14 nm (2014)


5 nm (estimated 2019)

Semiconductor technology roadmap

Resolution Enhancement Tech

Electron Projection L, Proximity EBL

Electron Projection L, Proximity EBL,


Maskless L

Extreme Ultraviolet

4
12/02/2014

What are limits to smallness


atoms, electrons, molecules

Granular nature of matter is the fundamental limit to


making anything arbitrarily small

No transistor smaller than an atom 0.1 nm, is possible

Again, we can manufacture 1,000 H20 molecules exactly


but to assemble them (below 0 C) in the form ‘NSU’ is
presently impossible!
Electrical/electronic charge q = 1.6x10-19 C  limit of
smallness

Molecules  combination of at least two atoms

How small can we make it?

Practical limits on making machines and devices on a large


scale are many orders magnitude larger in size
[with present day technology]

With conventional machine tools  mechanical parts below


mm size scarcely work

Challenge is to design and make to order a complex


structure out of molecular sized components

5
12/02/2014

Nanofabrication approaches
“Top-down” approach
• Uses the traditional methods
to pattern a bulk wafer

• Is limited by the resolution


of lithography

• Add a layer of material over


the entire wafer and pattern
that layer using
photolithography

• Pattern material by etching


away certain areas

Top-down approach
Lithography for nanoscale
- Micron scale lithography
Optical lithography, ultra-violet lithography
Focused Ion beam lithography
- 10-100 nm scale lithography
Electron-beam lithography
Resolution enhancement technology
Immersion lithography

6
12/02/2014

Bottom-up approach
• The opposite of “top-down”
approach
• Instead of taking materials away
to make structures, the “bottom-
up” approach selectively adds
atoms to create structures
• Nature uses the “bottom-up”
approach
Cells, Crystals
• Knowledge in chemistry and
biology can help to assemble
and control growth

Bottom-up approach

Chemical self-assembly
- Man-made synthesis (e.g. carbon nanotube)
- Biological synthesis (e.g. DNA, proteins)

Manipulation of individual atoms using


- Atomic force microscope
- Scanning Tunnelling microscope

7
12/02/2014

Top-down versus Bottom-up

Similar results can be obtained through bottom-up and top-down processes

You might also like