Module 4
Module 4
Module 4
The Constitution Act, 1976 is termed as one of the most controversial acts in
the history of amendments to the Indian Constitution. It amended/
introduced various provisions given below:
• Attempted to reduce the power of the Supreme Court and the High
Courts
• Laid down Fundamental Duties for citizens.
• Terms- Socialist, Secular and Integrity added to the Preamble
Parliamentary Committees
follows:-
(i) Quorum:
The day’s business usually starts with the question-hour during which questions are
asked by the members and the answers are provided by the concerned Minister.
This period follows the question hour and generally begins at noon. Usually the time
It is one for which an oral answer is required to be given by the Minister on the floor
of the House. Supplementary questions may be asked based on the Minister’s reply.
It is one for which the Minister lays on the table a written answer. A 10- day notice
has to be given to ask such questions and no supplementary questions can be asked
is for the Speaker to decide whether the matter is of urgent nature or not. The
member has also to state reasons for asking the questions while serving notice.
the normal rules. The Presiding officer decides whether the point of order raised by
AS there is usually a gap between the presentation of the budget and its approval, the
vote on account enables the government to draw some amount from the
Consolidated Fund of India to meet the expenses in the intervening period.
(ix) Guillotine:
The act of putting all the demands for grant to vote, without discussion on the last
This session is held when a new Parliament has been elected but the old Parliament
meets for the last time before it is dissolved. The lame-ducks are the members of the
The Indian judicial system follows the common law system based on recorded judicial
precedents as inherited from the British colonial legacy. The court system of India
comprises the Supreme Court of India, the High Courts and subordinate courts at
Supreme Court: It is the Apex court of the country and was constituted on 28th
January 1950. It is the highest court of appeal and enjoys both original suits and
appeals of High Court judgments. The Supreme Court is comprised of the Chief
Justice of India and 25 other judges. Articles 124-147 of the Constitution of India lay
down the authority of the Supreme Court.
2. High Courts: High Courts are the highest judicial body at the State level. Article
214 lays down the authority of High Courts. There are 25 High Courts in India. High
Courts exercise civil or criminal jurisdiction only if the subordinate courts in the State
are not competent to try the matters. High Courts may even take appeals from lower
courts. High Court judges are appointed by the President of India upon consultation
with the Chief Justice of India, the Chief Justice of the High Court and the Governor
of the State.
3. District Courts: District Courts are established by the State Governments of India
for every district or group of districts based on the caseload and population density.
District Courts are under the direct administration of High Courts and are bound by
High Court judgments. Every district generally has two kinds of courts:
a. Civil Courts
b. Criminal Courts
District Courts are presided over by District Judges. Additional District Judges and
Assistant District Judges may be appointed based on the caseload. Appeals against
District Court judgments lie in the High Court.
4. Lok Adalat/Village Courts: these are subordinate courts at the village level which
provide a system for alternate dispute resolution in villages.
5. Tribunals: the Constitution provides the government with the power to set up
special Tribunals for the administration of specific matters such as tax cases, land
cases, consumer cases etc.
1.judicial review, power of the courts of a country to examine the actions of the legislative,
executive, and administrative arms of the government and to determine whether such
actions are consistent with the constitution. Actions judged inconsistent are declared
unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void
2.J udicial Activism in India means that the Supreme Court and the High Courts have the
power to rule those laws that contradict or are incompatible with one or more constitutional
provisions that are unconstitutional and invalid. The inferior courts lack access to this
function udicial activism is the exercise of the power of judicial review to set aside
government acts. Generally, the phrase is used to identify undesirable exercises of that
power, but there is little agreement on which instances are undesirable.
In India, the doctrine of judicial activism was introduced in the mid-1970s. Justice V R
Krishna Iyer, Justice P N Bhagwati, Justice O Chinnappa Reddy and Justice D A Desai laid
the foundations of judicial activism in the country.