[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views3 pages

Writing A Summary

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

WRITING A SUMMARY

A summary is condensed version of a larger reading. A summary is not a rewrite of the


original piece and does not have to be long nor should it be long.

Your purpose in writing the summary is to give the basic ideas of the original reading.
What was it about and what did the autor want to communicate? Sometimes, the
central idea of the piece is stated in the introduction or first paragraph, and the
supporting ideas of this central idea are presented one by one in the following
paragraphs. Always read the introductory paragraph thoughtfully and look for a thesis
statement. Finding the thesis statement is like finding a key to a locked door.

Frequently, however, the thesis, or central idea, is implied or suggested. Thus, you will
have to work harder to figure out what the autor wants readers to understand. Use
any hints that may shed light on the meaning of the piece: pay attention to the title
and any headings and to the opening and closing lines of paragraphs.

In writing the summary, let your reader know the piece that you are summarizing.
Identify the title, autor and source of the piece. You may want to use this formula:

In _________________________ (title, source and date of piece), the autor shows


_______________________________ (central idea). The autor supports the main idea
by using ______________________ and showing that ______________________

REMEMBER:

1) STEP 1: Reading

- While reading the original work, take note of what or who is the focus and ask the
usual questions that reporters use: Who? What? When? Where? Why? How?
Underline important ideas. Circle key terms. Find the main point of the article. Divide
the article into sections or stages of thought, and label each section or stage of
thought in the margins. Note the main idea of each paragraph if the article is short.

- Do not rewrite the original piece. Use your own words to express briefly the main
idea and relevant details of the piece you have read.

If necessary, write brief summaries of each stage of thought or if appropriate each


paragraph. Use a separate piece of paper for this step. This should be a brief outline of
the article.
2) STEP 2: Writing

- Write your rough draft of the summary. Combine the information from the previous
steps into paragraphs, beginning by stating the main idea.

- Keep your summary short. Omit needless words and repetitions; avoid using “the
autor says…,” “the autor argues…,” etc.)

- Do not put in your opinion of the issue or topic discussed in the original piece.

- Do not use quotations, but if you use them be sure to quote correctly. Indicate
quotations with quotation marks. Cite each quotation correctly (give the page
number).

- Do not plagiarize. Cite any paraphrases by citing the page number the information
appears on. Avoid paraphrasing whenever possible. Use your own words to state the
ideas presented in the article.

- Use a lower level of technicality than the authors of the original article use.

- Write a summary rather than a table of contents.

[Wrong: This article covers point X. Then the article covers point Y.

Right: Glacial advances have been rapid as shown by x, y, and z.]

- Add no new data and none of your own ideas.

- Use a simple organization.

- Unless the examples in the article are essential, do not include the examples in your
summary. If you include them, remember to explain them.
SUMMARY SAMPLES:

1) Weak summary: the autor describes the article rather than summarizes [Chepesiuk,
R. (2005, January). Decibel hell. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113. A35-A41.]

This article focuses on the growing problema and cause of noise pollution. It explores
the effects of population growth, urban sprawl, and the increase of traffic and aircraft
prevalence on noise levels. This article offers specific information regarding decibel
measurements and risks of prolongued exposure. The autor provides specific decibel
levels for a variety of machines and situations.

I plan to use this information in the final report section dealing with health risks
caused by high noise levels. <evaluation

2) Better: the autor summarizes by providing key details [Chepesiuk, R. (2005,


January). Decibel hell. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113. A35-A41.]

This article provides information on the growing problema and causes of noise
pollution. Population growth, urban sprawl, and increases in traffic and aircraft
transportation are having a marked effect on noise levels. Escalating decibel levels and
prolongued exposure increase the risks to hearing and health. In the United States, 30
million employees are vulnerable to the possibility of hearing loss because of
hazardous noise levels on the job. Children and animals are also at risk to the physical
effects of noise, such as stress, elevated blood pressure, and increased heart rate.
Various decibel measuring machines are available for various situations. In conclusion,
the article show that health and hearing risks due to combined decibel levels and
extended exposures occur in everyday life.

You might also like