Wp20 en Historia

4th Meeting of the APIRG
Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Sub-group

(Dakar, Senegal, 25-29 July 2011)
WP/20
Automatic Dependent Surveillance -
Broadcast (ADS-B) Planning and
Implementation issues
AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

The ADS-B System
The ADS-B system is made up of three

basis parts:
• Transponder or non-transponder
transmitter.
• Signal in space.
• Receiver.

ADS-B International Standards
• 1090 ES Mode S Extended Squitter.

– Internationally accepted.
• Universal Access Transceiver 978 MHz.
– Currently employed in the US as a
second datalink supporting GA.
• VDL Mode 4.

1090 MHz Mode S Extended Squitter (1090ES)
• ADS-B using 1090ES is a natural extension of the
basic Mode S Transponder broadcast message.
• ADS-B Minimum Aviation System Performance
Standards (MASPS) published as RTCA DO-242,
February 1998 (the basis for ADS-B Version 0), and
updated as RTCA DO-242A, June 2002 (the basis for
ADS-B Version 1).
• Minimum Operational Performance Standards (MOPS)
for 1090ES published as RTCA DO-260, Sept 2000
(defined ADS-B Version 0 formats), and updated as
RTCA DO-260A, April 2003 (defined ADS-B Version 1
formats).
4

Universal Access Transceiver (UAT)
• UAT is a multi-purpose aeronautical data link
supporting:
– ADS-B,
– Traffic Information Service – Broadcast (TIS-B), and
– Flight Information Service - Broadcast (FIS-B).
• RTCA DO-282 (August 2002) defines formats for ADS-
B Version 1 for UAT.
• RTCA DO-282A (July 2004) updated formats after the
ICAO ACP development of the UAT SARPs.
• RTCA DO-282B published in December 2009 defines
ADS-B Version 2 formats for UAT.
• ACP currently updating respective ICAO provisions. 5

VDL Mode 4
• EUROCAE has published MOPS.

• ICAO has produced SARPS and guidance
material.

Changes Between DO-260 & DO-260A
(1090ES ADS-B Version 0 & Version 1)
• 1090ES requirements changes resulted
in a major version change, Version 0 to
Version 1. These included:
– Recognition that integrity and accuracy of
the position data was required to be
separately conveyed.
– Lack of mature receiver requirements.
– Additional aircraft state changes identified
as required parameters for transmission.

Evolution of DO-260A to DO-260B
• Problems identified from operational

experience and application development
activities resulted in:
– DO-260A Change 1 (June 2006), and
– DO-260A Change 2 (December 2006).
• DO-260B incorporated these changes as
well as further refinements/enhancements.

Changes Between DO-260A & DO-260B
(1090ES ADS-B Version 1 and Version 2)
Capability DO- DO- DO- Comments
260 260A 260B
NUC (Navigation Uncertainty Code) Baseline
Mode A Code Support legacy ATC infrastructure
NACp (Navigation Accuracy Code for Position) Replaced NUC
SIL (Surveillance Integrity Level) Replaced NUC
NIC (Navigation Integrity Code) Replaced NUC
Revise SIL to become Source Integrity Level & add: Clearly separates the reporting to reflect equipment
SDA (System Design Assurance) certification levels and navigation source fault detection
capability
Revise NIC/NAC/SIL and add To improve vertical accuracy, decouple vertical from
GVA (Geometric Vertical Accuracy) NIC/NAC/SIL and add GVA
Add ADS-B IN bits Enhancement to show both UAT IN and 1090ES IN receiver
equipage
Changes to the Target State Report To better align with available aircraft data
Offer non-diversity antenna options for small aircraft Lower cost of equipage for General Aviation
Revise latency requirement (limit extrapolation) Enhancement
New guidance on how to determine NACv Fix
New guidance on how to select the best position/state Fix

vector sources
Changes to the Mode A Code transmission rates Improvements and squitter efficiencies
Redefine TCAS status bits Fix
Fixes and improvement to NIC reporting and modified Improvements for Surface applications
surface movement field for airport surface
AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL 9

Some Examples of ADS-B Implementation
• Australia, Canada, Europe and the US

have commissioned ADS-B systems
operating today.
• Other states are considering ADS-B as a
future surveillance solution and have trials
either planned or underway.
10

RTCA and EUROCAE ADS-B Documentation
11

ICAO SARPs and ADS-B Documentation
AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL 12

Next Steps
• Tenth meeting of the Working Group (WG) of the ASP

held in Toulouse, France (11 to 15 April 2011), to
prepare for the second meeting of the Working Group of
the Whole (WGW/2) which is planned to be held at the
ICAO HQ in September 2011.
• It was decided that the ASP WGW/2 should be held
from 29 to 30 September 2011 (after the Eleventh WG
meeting to be held from 26 to 28 September) with only
two agenda items:
– I. Proposed amendments to existing provisions
on surveillance and collision avoidance systems in
light of operational experience; and
– II. Future work 13

A - Proposed amendments to existing
provisions
• The main topic under I would be proposed amendments to
Annex 10 Vol IV introducing a new version of extended
squitter messages (Version 2 equal to RTCA DO 260 B) and
a edition of Manual on Technical Provisions for Mode S
Services and Extended Squitter (Doc 9871) that contains all
message formats and requirements of the new version.
• Compared to earlier versions, Version 2 redefines the ADS-B
integrity by treating source of the data and the system
separately and in this respect, defines the necessary
parameters. It also includes the transmission of selected
altitude, selected heading and barometric pressure setting of
the aircraft. Version 2 messages also provide for the
transmission of Mode A codes and the presence of the ACAS
resolution advisory (RA) in the flight deck.
14

A-Proposed amendments to existing
provisions
• There won’t be any guidance material for the flight testing of

ADS-B and MLAT at the subject meeting as the work has not
sufficiently matured and moreover, there is no urgency for
such material as major ADS-B implementations which can
provide the basis for the development of the material are
years away.
15

B-Future work
• Under II, the meeting will propose a new work programme which
includes, inter alia, the development of low-power and low-cost
ADS-B OUT/IN units for :
– airport surface vehicles to prevent runway incursions; and
– light aviation (e.g. gliders) to improve the general situational
awareness in uncontrolled airspace.
• The proposed new work programme also includes the
development of multistatic radar which uses the emissions of
other radio transmitters (e.g. broadcasting stations) to get a fix
on the aircraft. Obviously this would be to enable the
implementation of aeronautical surveillance systems at much
lower costs.
• The foreseen completion dates for new work items is the end of
2015. The report of the ASP WGW/2 is to be reviewed by the Air
Navigation Commission in late 2011. 16

Conclusion
• The CNS/SG is invited to:

– Note the evolution of ADS-B standards and
future work;
– Request AFI States to establish a regulatory
framework for ADS-B based on applicable
standards.
-END-
17

18

Wp20 en Historia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wp20 en Historia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wp20 en Historia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4th Meeting of the APIRG

Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Sub-group

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

The ADS-B system is made up of three

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

• 1090 ES Mode S Extended Squitter.

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

• EUROCAE has published MOPS.

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

• Problems identified from operational

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

Mode A Code Support legacy ATC infrastructure

NACp (Navigation Accuracy Code for Position) Replaced NUC

SIL (Surveillance Integrity Level) Replaced NUC

NIC (Navigation Integrity Code) Replaced NUC

Revise latency requirement (limit extrapolation) Enhancement

New guidance on how to determine NACv Fix

New guidance on how to select the best position/state Fix

Redefine TCAS status bits Fix

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL 9

• Australia, Canada, Europe and the US

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL 12

• Tenth meeting of the Working Group (WG) of the ASP

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

• There won’t be any guidance material for the flight testing of

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

• The CNS/SG is invited to:

AERONAUTICAL SURVEILLANCE PANEL

You might also like