Signal Integrity Handbook
Signal Integrity Handbook
HANDBOOK
The 5G /6G Network, High-Performance Computing, Artificial Intelligence and Auto "2.0" industries are driving
new architectures that demand previously unimaginable transmission speeds, bandwidths, frequencies and
densities – all while balancing scalability, power and thermal management concerns, and of course, cost.
Interconnect solutions that support bleeding edge speeds are a necessary component of next generation
high-performance systems. Those
capabilities, however, can be rendered
ineffective unless they are part of a
well-designed and optimized system.
A holistic approach to system design –
particularly as speeds, bandwidths and
densities increase – is a necessity.
The purpose of this handbook is to provide a reference for those with little or no signal integrity (SI) experience
who are tasked with selecting a high-speed interconnect. The information included has been carefully developed
by Samtec's industry-leading Signal Integrity Engineers to help facilitate informed decisions when specifying
components that will affect a system’s signal integrity.
For additional assistance with complex system design challenges, Samtec provides high-level design and
engineering support both at the component level and system level - from bare die, to IC package, to PCB, to
connectors and cables, and back again. To discuss your specific application, please contact sig@samtec.com or
learn more about Samtec's signal integrity capabilities at samtec.com/s2s.
Table of Contents
I. SIGNAL INTEGRITY FUNDAMENTALS | 4-5 VI. CHANNEL PERFORMANCE METRIC | 13
ii. Boundaries
II. SIGNALING TERMS | 6
iii. Validation
i. NRZ & PAM4 iv. Encrypted 3D Components
III. FREQUENCY DOMAIN & S-PARAMETERS | 7-9 VIII. SYSTEM ANALYSIS | 16-17
i. Insertion Loss i. Eye Diagram
ii. Return Loss ii. Channel Operating Margin (COM)
iii. Crosstalk
IX. SELECTING A CONNECTOR | 18-19
iv. Mode Conversion
i. Contact Spacing
v. Electromagnetic Interference
ii. Pin Mapping
vi. Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR)
Figure 1. As water circuits are subject to reduced flow along the water path. electrical circuits
are subject to attenuation along the signal path.
In order to reduce interference and extend the capabilities of high-speed circuits, many interfaces have adopted a differential
signaling architecture rather than single-ended signaling. Differential signals in PCB designs are more resilient against coupling
with nearby magnetic fields (crosstalk), allowing for longer lengths and higher speeds in dense designs.
Figure 2. In differential
signaling, because the
two signals propagate
180 degrees out of
phase, they are resistant
to the influence of noise,
and the signal at the
receiver matches the one
from the sender.
Bandwidth and Data Rate within an interconnect and not just the capability of a single lane.
For example, 800 Gb Ethernet may describe eight lanes operating
Data rate references the number of bits transferred per second.
at 100 Gbps. Use caution and context to verify data rate statements.
Bandwidth refers to the frequency spectrum required to transmit
those bits.
Unit Interval
Unfortunately, PAM4 signaling is more sensitive to noise sources such as reflection and crosstalk (see Figure 3). This is due to the
reduced signal amplitude (1/3 of NRZ), effectively reducing the signal-to-noise ratio. The highest speed standards operating at
NRZ/PAM2 are 28 and 32 Gbps. Above this data rate, PAM4 is typically used, beginning at 56 and 64 Gbps and beyond.
Characterizations in the frequency domain are not specific to a particular data rate. Interpretation depending on frequencies of
interest is left to the reader. The following sections provide a guide.
i. Insertion Loss
In the frequency domain, the transferred signal
through a medium is characterized as insertion loss
(IL). In a two-port device under test (DUT), insertion
loss is the magnitude of S21 in an S-parameter matrix
and expressed in dB, where the nomenclature "21"
(expressed as "two-one") refers to the signal observed
at port 2 when stimulated at port 1.
In some cases, industry specifications for insertion loss Figure 5: Example of connector performance where insertion loss
must be satisfied for components or complete channels. performance target is highlighted in green.
Often component bandwidth is defined as the point where insertion loss crosses -3 dB. However, for high-speed applications,
this rule is less applicable. It is not uncommon to require -1 to -2 dB insertion loss from a small component (like a connector) at
Nyquist frequency (see Figure 5).
For larger components, like cables or even packages, insertion loss is significant and a wholistic assessment, channel insertion
loss must be evaluated against interface requirements.
ii. Return Loss Crosstalk power sum is the combination of multiple crosstalk
responses in an effort to describe the total crosstalk noise in a
Return loss (RL) is a measurement of reflected noise in a system (see Figure 9). It may be separated as NEXT and FEXT
single port due to impedance mismatch against a reference power sums.
value (see Figure 6). As device impedance becomes further
mismatched to the reference impedance, return loss increases iv. Mode Conversion
in the positive direction. Reference impedances are most often
50 Ω, 46.25 Ω or 42.5 Ω, depending on the application. Mixed modes are undesirable energy lost from or added to
the differential signal. They can be measured at the system
iii. Crosstalk or component level. SDC, or differential-to-common mode
conversion, is the amount of transmitted differential signal that
Crosstalk is unwanted coupled noise that a signal lane remains when the positive and negative signals of the pair are
experiences from other nearby lanes or sources. Every part subtracted. Similarly, SCD is common-to-differential mode and
of the interconnect, from chip to chip, is a potential source of represents noise sources added to the differential signal that
crosstalk. Most applications desire crosstalk levels of -40 dB remain after subtraction.
through Nyquist frequency (see Figure 7).
For a perfectly balanced differential pair, SCD & SDC are zero.
There are two types of crosstalk of concern in high-speed Imbalances and skew within the pair lead to mixed modes
systems, near-end crosstalk (NEXT) and far-end crosstalk (FEXT) that can be observed as through, reflected, or coupled noise.
(see Figure 8). NEXT is the measure of crosstalk coupling from Sometimes specifications provide limits for mixed modes.
transmitting (Tx) lanes onto nearby receiving (Rx) lanes. NEXT
is most critical when coupling sources (vias, connectors, etc.) v. Electromagnetic Interference
occur near the transmitting source (where Tx signal levels are
the highest and the Rx signal levels are the smallest). Electromagnetic interference (EMI) refers to the electrical
noise that is emitted to other electrical devices that are
FEXT relates to signals traveling in the same direction. For operating nearby.
example, FEXT is the noise that a transmitting lane experiences
from other transmitting lanes. It is generally viewed in the Because of the serious nature of electromagnetic
context of the length and loss of the channel. With FEXT, both compatibility (EMC) issues, many governments require EMI
the crosstalk levels and signal levels are attenuating together compliance testing of active electronic systems. In the US,
before reaching the receiver. regulations are administered by the Federal Communications
Figure 6: As a rule of thumb, RL values of less than -15 dB in the Figure 7: Crosstalk is measured in dB as the ratio of sent to
frequency band of interest are desirable, and a value of -15 dB is received noise; smaller (negative) numbers represent less
typically sufficient. crosstalk (which is desirable).
Skew is defined as the difference in propagation delay between multiple wires. For a single-ended bus, skew between data
and a clock may be important. In a differential pair, skew between the two wires composing the pair is critical. Between
differential pairs, skew may be less stringent, and requirements vary by interface.
Within a differential pair, skew leads to increased insertion loss, impedance mismatch, crosstalk, and EMI. Sources of skew may
include bends in PCB routing, PCB routing parallel to glass bundles called “fiber weave skew,” right-angle connectors, and
cable assemblies physical length mismatch.
As a rule of thumb, rise time is 25% of the unit interval. So, a 10 Gbps signal contains the same signal content as a 25 ps rise
time: 0.25 * ( 1 / 10E 9 ). The rise time is the same for 28 Gbps NRZ and 56 Gbps PAM4 signals as they share the same Nyquist
frequency and unit intervals (~36 ps). For this case, rise time = 9 ps, unit interval = 36 ps, and Nyquist frequency is 14 GHz.
Time domain characterizations require a rise time input, most commonly TDR. Rise time used for TDR should be related to
the data rate of interest. It is important to note that rise time degrades as a signal passes through the interconnect due to
dispersion. Dispersion is the spread of signal due to changes in propagation delay across frequencies in PCB dielectrics.
Receiver equalization is designed to compensate for dispersion.
At slow rise times, the device will appear to have an impedance value close to the reference or system impedance. But as rise times
decrease (in other words, as edge rates get faster), the measured impedance values begin to move toward the true characteristic
impedance of the component. At an infinitely short rise time, we would measure the true characteristic impedance of a device.
This effect is important when seeking an interconnect solution for a system with an impedance other than the reference impedance
used in the characterization process. In those instances, the impedance values at the fastest rise times on the TDR impedance
profile should be used as an approximation of the interconnect’s “true” characteristic impedance (see Figure 11).
Figure 11: Measured TDR Differential Impedance for a Samtec NovaRay® 7 mm stack height from high-speed
characterization reports with three apparent impedances at 30, 50 and 100 ps rise times.
There are also system-level characterization analysis tools based on building schematics and libraries, including scripted
programmed functionalities that allow engineers to bring models from concept to realization (see Figure 12).
ii. Boundaries
Understanding a model’s boundary is important when interpreting frequency or time domain reports. Models can vary in terms
of the impedance and duration of PCB routing that is included. For example, if the pads or vertical transitions of the PCB or
breakout region (BOR) are not included, performance may further degrade when they are added. Comparing products with
different extents of the interconnect included may lead to incorrect conclusions. Clear documentation should indicate the
physical location of model ports.
In some instances, connector models do not include PCB breakout areas. This enables modeling of application specific stack-
up and breakout needs separately. Simulation tools provide functions to cascade S-parameters, combining separate connector
and PCB models (see Figure 13).
iii. Validation
Several criteria are often checked to determine model or measurement quality for use in system analysis, including passivity,
causality, and reciprocity. Definitions of these terms are provided in the IEEE 370-2020 standard. Software to evaluate these
limits is provided by IEEE 370-2020 and is also being implemented in several commercial tools.
Model bandwidth, or maximum frequency available for a given model, needs to meet or exceed the spectrum for which energy
exists for a given data rate. Therefore, a minimum range of 1.5x to 3x Nyquist frequency is recommended to account for the
higher frequency harmonics contained in the signal energy.
Simulation of an entire link can be done in a number of available tools. Many standards offer simulation tools preloaded with
transmitter and receiver configurations. This includes the free, open-source tool Seasim for PCI Express® channels and the
channel operating margin (COM) algorithm for IEEE and OIF. If specific silicon is known, IBIS-AMI models (which can be used
in commercial tools such as ADS) may be obtained to represent the actual noise levels, which may be better than specification
limits. Channel simulation can require product eye diagrams, COM results, or BER.
i. Eye Diagram
Slew Rate = tan(𝛼)
An eye diagram is a characterization of system level
performance. Eye patterns are generated by sending Rise
continuous streams of data from a transmitter to a receiver EH
Edge
and overlaying the received bits upon one another. Over
time, the received data builds to resemble an eye.
Figure 16: COM voltage injection and voltage measurement points. COM is computed from a voltage injection point
(VIP) to voltage measurement point (VMP) from provided measured S-parameters TP0 to TP5.
Many parameters critical to high-speed connector performance will vary significantly depending upon the pin assignment and
form factor. An open-pin-field connector will have improved crosstalk performance when two grounds are placed between
signals (SSGGSS) as compared to a single ground (SSGSS). A design with a smaller pitch may favor system placement because
of its greater density; however, performance could be reduced as higher crosstalk is incurred due to proximity. This is not
always true due to innovative designs, so it is critical to refer to SI characterization reports to make the best decisions.
i. Contact Spacing
As the distance between contacts increases, inductive and capacitive coupling decrease. This effect can be observed in an
electromagnetic field plot by noting the reduced number and density of field lines connecting the two conductors. For example, a
connector with terminals spaced on a 0.80 mm pitch will typically have better crosstalk performance than one with a 0.50 mm pitch.
In differential pair systems, increasing the distance between adjacent pairs minimizes coupling and, in some cases, eliminates the
need for interstitial grounds, so total signal density can be increased (see Figure 17).
Figure 17: Recommended PCB Layout footprint for Samtec Edge Rate® (ERX8 and ERX5 Series)
with 0.80 mm pitch and 0.50 mm pitch, greater pitch spacing, and interstitial spacing.
To increase isolation, more return paths could be added between signals. For example, optimal solution mappings could have
a 1:2 signal-to-ground ratio. Differential solutions would then use DP-G-G-DP while single-ended applications would use SGGS.
These can be directed either vertically or horizontally depending on the connector solution. This approach, however, will reduce
the signal density of the interconnect (see Figure 18).
Figure 18: Single-ended 1:1 pattern (above) and differential pair 1:2 optimal horizontal pattern
(below) from Samtec’s SEARAY™ high-speed characterization report.
• Does this connector have a single ground (GND) or – Routing at non-orthogonal angles can reduce fiber
double GND positions between signals in a row? This will weave skew. The design should avoid using angles
affect crosstalk performance and routing that must travel within +/- 10 degrees of the orthogonal directions
through rows of vias. If routing through a row of vias, it is on the panel because of manufacturing variations
critical to design around the routing path early. between the orthogonal directions of the fiberglass
and those of the copper trace etch (see Figure 19).
• How much space do I have left to add GND vias for
• Length matching the traces within a signal pair is critical.
shielding, and where can I place them to shield crosstalk
It is best to do this by having an equal number of left
most effectively?
and right turns as a trace routes across the board.
Length matching structures like ‘serpentine’ traces are
• Large open areas should be avoided in the BOR because
acceptable but should be avoided if the signal can be
they can resonate. GND vias can be placed to break up
balanced by matching left and right turns.
and limit the size of dielectric cavities. Larger cavities
resonate at lower frequencies, so the importance of this is • Thieving or copper balancing is placed throughout the
bandwidth dependent. board to keep the dielectric thickness consistent through
a uniform copper density.
• After the overall layout of the vias and routing has been
established, the signal vias can be impedance optimized • Routing length across the board should be kept as short
by changing the distance between the edges of the GND as possible within reason. Longer traces increase signal
planes and the sides of the signal vias. The cut outs in the loss and reduce the signal bandwidth.
GND planes that allow signal vias to transition through
layers are known as anti-pads, and the anti-pad diameters
are tuned to optimize via impedance.
Additionally, it is possible to use cables and connectors designed for RF/microwave applications for high-speed digital
applications, so some comparison of similar terms might be useful. While a full discussion of RF is beyond the scope of this
document, below is a brief listing of some RF terms and how they are analogous to SI ones.
As mentioned above, VSWR is one characteristic that is commonly used to specify RF cables and is related to return loss. Others
include cable propagation velocity (which is related to time delay in a digital application), RF phase matching (which is analogous
to skew), attenuation (which is analogous to insertion loss), and RF cable shielding (which is analogous to isolation and crosstalk).
There is much to consider when selecting a high-speed interconnect. For additional assistance, see the resources suggested
and/or contact sig@samtec.com.
Samtec Signal Integrity Engineers address next generation system design challenges with industry-leading expertise in high-
performance interconnect systems, along with testing and validation services, system optimization support, and easy-to-use
design and development tools. Contact sig@samtec.com to discuss your specific application.
• High Data Rate Simulations • Signal/Power Integrity Expertise • Member/Participant of 30+ Industry,
Corporate & De Facto Standards
• Channel Analysis • Testing, Validation & Analysis
• Compatible/compliant products
• Signal Integrity Models • Full Channel SI Analysis/Optimization include: VITA, PICMG®, PCIe®, CXL,
IEEE, OIF, SFF-SIG, PC/104™, PISMO™,
• PCB & Breakout Region (BOR) Designs • PCB Layout & Routing Assistance SATA, USB and more
• Innovative product search, connector • Large Technical Library offers free 3D • Semiconductor & T+M partnerships
builder and simulation tools that help models, prints, footprints, test reports, demonstrate next gen 112/224 Gbps
streamline the design process white papers, application notes, etc. PAM4 interconnect solutions
Design Qualification Testing (DQT) Severe Environment Testing (SET) Signal Integrity Screening
Standard testing undergone by all Additional testing evaluates whether VNA-based test system screens for
Samtec products to verify the product select products are suitable for rugged manufacturing process anomalies that
design meets our intent. and/or harsh environments and other could lead to SI degradation in higher
extreme applications. samtec.com/SET data rate products.
Extended Life Product™ (E.L.P.™)
22 samtec.com/signalintegrity
Samtec-designed Evaluation & Development Kits simplify the design process and reduce time to market. Kits are available
for many of our high-performance connector sets, high-speed cable assemblies and optical solutions. Custom kits are also
available. Visit samtec.com/kits or contact kitsandboards@samtec.com for a full list of availability.
VITA 57.4 FMC+ VITA 57.4 FMC+ Extender Card VITA 57.4 FMC+ FMC+ HSPC Loopback Card
HSPC Loopback Card 25/28 Gbps FireFly™ Module Supporting Xilinx® Virtex®
UltraScale™+ VCU118 Kit
ExaMAX® High-Speed Backplane Generate™ High-Speed Generate™ Differential Pair AcceleRate® HD High-Density
System (EBTF/EBTM) Edge Card Socket (HSEC6-DV) Edge Card Socket (HSEC8-DP) Arrays (ADM6/ADF6)
ExaMAX® Backplane AcceleRate® Flyover® NovaRay® Flyover® Extreme Flyover® QSFP Bulls Eye® 70 GHz
Cable System Slim Direct Attach Cable Density & Performance Cable Double Density Cable System High-Performance
(EBCM/EBTF-RA) System (ARC6/ARF6) System (NVAC/NVAM-C) (FQSFP-DD to NVAC/ARC6) Test System (BE70A)
samtec.com/kits 23
REFERENCE & FURTHER READING
Articles / Papers:
Boesing, D., New High-Speed Connector Rating that Accounts for Entire System, Samtec Blog (2016)
Burns, M., Samtec Releases New Protocol Capabilities for High-Performance Interconnect, Samtec Blog (2018)
Channel Design,"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)," Raleigh, NC,
2014, pp. 648-653
Edwards, A., 3D Components and Service Strategy, Signal Integrity Journal, August 31, 2021
Gore, B., IEEE Channel Operating Margin (COM) For Channel Analysis, Samtec gEEk® spEEk (2020)
Gore, B. and R. Mellitz, "An Exercise in Applying Channel Operating Margin (COM) for 10GBASE-KR Channel
Design," 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), 2014
Gore, B., "25 Gbps Ethernet Channel Design in Context: Channel Operating Margin (COM)," SI Symposium,
Penn State Harrisburg, 2016
Krooswyk, S., Component Crosstalk Characterization by ICN, Samtec gEEk® spEEk (2020)
Krooswyk, S. and M. Rengarajan, "Don’t Judge a Bit Just By Its Fourier: 112G PAM4 Component Optimization
and Selection," DesignCon 2019
Love, J., High Bandwidth Connectors: Sorting Out What Matters, Signal Integrity Journal, April 19 2022
McMorrow, S., Practical Use of ERL to Optimize Interconnect/BOR Design, Samtec gEEk® spEEk (2020)
Mellitz, R., Effective Return Loss and How it is Computed, Samtec gEEk® spEEk (2020)
Mellitz, R., A. Ran, M. Li and V. Ragavassamy, "Channel Operating Margin (COM): Evolution of Channel
Specifications for 25 Gbps and Beyond," DesignCon 2013
Mellitz, R. and E. Sayre, "Effective Return Loss for 112G and 56G PAM 4," DesignCon 2018
Niehoff, B., What is PAM4? Understanding NRZ and PAM4 Signaling, Samtec Blog (2020)
Simonovich, B., "A Guide for Single-Ended to Mixed-Mode S-parameter Conversions," Signal Integrity Journal,
July 31, 2020
Trobough, N., "RF to Digital: Extreme Coaxial Cable Requirements," Signal Integrity Journal, April 7, 2022
Bogatin, E., Bogatin’s Practical Guide to Transmission Line Design and Characterization for Signal Integrity
Applications (2020)
Hall, S.H. and H. L. Heck, Advanced Signal Integrity for High-Speed Digital Designs, IEEE Press, 2009
Zhang, H., S. Krooswyk and J. Ou, High Speed Digital Design: Design of High Speed Interconnects and
Signaling (2015)
—B— —N—
BER bit error ratio NEXT near-end crosstalk
BOR breakout region NRZ non-return to zero
—C— —O—
COM channel operating margin OIF Optical Internetworking Forum
— D— —P—
DDR double-data rate (refers to memory) PAM2 pulse amplitude modulation 2-level
DUT device under test PAM4 pulse amplitude modulation 4-level
PCB printed circuit board
—E— PHY physical layer
EMC electromagnetic compatibility
EMI electromagnetic interference —R—
ERL effective return loss RL return loss
Rx receive
—F—
FCC Federal Communications Commission (USA) —S—
FEXT far-end crosstalk SI signal integrity
SMT surface mount
—G—
GND ground —T—
TDR time domain reflectometer/reflectometry
—I— Tx transmit
ICN integrated crosstalk noise
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers —U—
IL insertion loss UCIe™ Universal Chiplet Interconnect Express
ILD insertion loss deviation
IRL integrated return loss —V—
ISI inter-symbol interference VNA vector network analyzer
VSWR voltage standing wave ratio
—L—
LED light-emitting diode
Product names used herein are trademarks of their respective owners. All information and material in this publication are
property of Samtec, Inc. All related rights are reserved. Samtec, Inc. does not authorize customers to make copies of the
content for any use.
Terms of Use
Use of this publication is limited to viewing the pages for evaluation or purchase. No permission is granted to the user to
copy, print, distribute, transmit, display in public, or modify the contents of this document in any way.
Disclaimer
The information in this publication may change without notice. All materials published here are “As Is” and without implied
or express warranties. Samtec, Inc. does not warrant that this publication will be without error, or that defects will be
corrected. Samtec, Inc. makes every effort to present our customers an excellent and useful publication, but we do not
warrant or represent the use of the materials here in terms of its accuracy, reliability or otherwise. Therefore, you agree that
all access and use of this publication’s content is at your own risk.
Patents
Multiple patents are issued and pending.
Updated Documentation
Please contact sig@samtec.com to get access to the latest Signal Integrity documentation, and to ensure that you have the
latest version of this document.
NEITHER SAMTEC, INC. NOR ANY PARTY INVOLVED IN CREATING, PRODUCING, OR DELIVERING THIS
PUBLICATION SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, OR PUNITIVE
DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF YOUR ACCESS, USE OR INABILITY TO ACCESS OR USE THIS PUBLICATION, OR
ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN ITS CONTENT.
PCI-SIG®, PCI Express® and the PCIe® design marks are registered trademarks and/or service marks of PCI-SIG.
ExaMAX® is a registered trademark of AFCI.
UNITED STATES • NORTHERN CALIFORNIA • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA • SOUTH AMERICA • UNITED KINGDOM
GERMANY • FRANCE • ITALY • NORDIC/BALTIC • BENELUX • ISRAEL • INDIA • AUSTRALIA / NEW ZEALAND
SINGAPORE • JAPAN • CHINA • TAIWAN • HONG KONG • KOREA