[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
251 views1 page

Injunctions and Equitable Remedies Guide

The document discusses various equitable remedies and defenses including injunctions, rescission, restitution, reformation, and specific performance. It provides details on the general requirements and circumstances for each remedy, such as showing irreparable harm for an injunction or mutual mistake for reformation. It also discusses defenses that can prevent equitable relief like unclean hands, laches, and equitable estoppel.

Uploaded by

James Hutchins
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
251 views1 page

Injunctions and Equitable Remedies Guide

The document discusses various equitable remedies and defenses including injunctions, rescission, restitution, reformation, and specific performance. It provides details on the general requirements and circumstances for each remedy, such as showing irreparable harm for an injunction or mutual mistake for reformation. It also discusses defenses that can prevent equitable relief like unclean hands, laches, and equitable estoppel.

Uploaded by

James Hutchins
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

INJUNCTIONS RESCISSION

GENERALLY: discretionary; req’s lack of adequate remedy at law & GENERALLY: cancel a void or voidable K; affirmation of K after
feasible enforcement; can be enforced by crim or civil contempt. learning of grounds for rescission bars remedy.
PREJUDGMENT INJ: issued pending trial to preserve status quo. FRAUD: pled w/ particularity & defrauded pty offers to restore
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO): effective until prelim’y inj benefit received from K.
hearing, max 30 days; issued ex parte if (1) immediate & irreparable MISTAKE: pled w/ particularity, unilateral or mutual, neg is a
loss will result before hearing & (2) reason notice shouldn’t be req’d. defense unless non-mistaken pty has not been prej by mistake.
Interlocutory Inj: effective until final judgment of pending suit; no NON-PERFORMANCE: must be mat; ptys can be restored to pre-K.
ex parte issuance; req’s (1) sub threat P will suffer irreparable harm, UCC: seller – wrongful rejection, failure to pay on/before
(2) P’s hardship outweighs D’s hardship, (3) public int not disserved, delivery, or repudiation; buyer – failure to deliver, repudiation,
& (4) likelihood of success on merits. or rightful rejection/revocation of acceptance.
FINAL INJ: issued after final decree of case; req’s (1) P will suffer RESTITUTION
irreparable harm, (2) P’s hardship outweighs D’s hardship, (3) GENERALLY: P conferred benefit on D & D’s retention is unjust.
public int not disserved, & (4) lack of adequate remedy at law. CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST: (1) D holds title to prop, (2) D’s retention of
PROPERTY INT: prop unique & dmgs inadequate. prop violates equitable principles, & (3) legal remedy inadequate
Future Trespass: inj not ok unless injury irreparable in dmgs, D (incl insolvency of D); tracing – may impose on exchanged prop;
insolvent, or multiple lawsuits necessary. not allowed against BFP w/out notice.
Encroachment: focus is relative hardship; intent’l – P entitled to inj EQUITABLE LIEN: (1) D holds title to prop, (2) P’s services improve
if D has notice; innocent – P entitled to inj unless D’s hardship to prop, (3) D’s retention violates equity, (4) legal remedy
remove structure sig greater than P’s injury. inadequate; P’s lien has priority over unsecured creditors.
Easement: inj ok if D interferes w/ P’s rts unless hardship SUBROGATION: P conferred benefit to D & D used benefit to
disproportionate; self-help ok if no br of peace; P must gen first ask D discharge an obligation or lien; P takes priority of lienholder.
to remove obstruction; P liable for unnec’y dmg to D’s land. REFORMATION
Waste: inj ok to prevent affirmative; not ok for permissive; ok for REFORMATION: (1) agreement exists, & (2) written K fails to reflect
ameliorative if D’s prop int is short duration; P must have clear title. agreement due to mutual mistake or fraud.
Nuisance: private – balance equities; public – inj ok if crim punish DEFENSES: BFP rts, neg of pty seeking reformation, 7 yr statute of
inadequate, final inj not ok for public entity D w/ rt to take the prop. limitations, laches, unclean hands.
PERSONAL INJURY: inj ok if D’s conduct ongoing & P at risk. NON-DEFENSES: parol ev rule, statute of frauds.
BUSINESS/CONTRACT: interfere w/ K – inj ok bc threat of loss of OTHER REMEDIES
unique opp; trade secret – inj ok even w/out K. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT: actual controversy of legal rt/status;
SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE judgment can’t prej rts of 3rd pty; (eg, land border dispute; K terms).
GENERALLY: (1) K exists, (2) K terms are certain, (3) conditions for NE EXEAT: restrain person from leaving JX of state (eg, pty jointly
perf are satisfied, (4) dmgs are inadequate (eg, prop unique or P responsible for perf a duty; pty about to remove prop other pty has int in).
can’t cover), (5) relief is equitable, & (6) enforcement is feasible. QUIA TIMET: quiet title action to cancel an instrument that clouds
LAND SALE K: SP gen ok, may incl price abatement; seller can’t title or resolves disputed title claims.
convey more rts than he has; must satisfy statute of frauds. BILL OF PEACE: confirm rt previously established by more than 1
Equitable Conversion: equitable lien secures payment; casualty risk trial likely to be litigated again (avoid multiplicity of actions).
of loss on buyer if seller not at fault & K conditions satisfied; can’t TROVER: P seeks return of personal prop wrongfully taken or
compel payment for ins maintained by other pty; dead seller prop retained; can be in addition to or in lieu of dmgs.
held in trust for buyer; no equitable int in option until exercised. EJECTMENT: P shows title to land & rt to immediate possession; D
NON-COMPETE: SP ok if restrictions reas in time, geographic dispossessed of land & P entitled to dmgs for value of use; D may
area, & scope of prohibited activity; ct can modify. be entitled to offset value of improvements if P seeks dmgs.
Relationship: employee regularly solicited customers, made sales, WRIT OF MANDAMUS: compel public officer to perform ministerial
perf manager duties, or perf duties of key prof’l; distr’r & manuf’r; duty (no discretion or gross abuse of discretion).
lessor & lessee; p’ship & ptner; franchise; seller & buyer of business. WRIT OF PROHIBITION: restrain subordinate ct from exceeding JX.
Time: employee – during term & 2 yrs after presumed reas; seller of QUO WARRANTO: challenge rt to perf duty of public office (not gov).
business – presumed reas if no more than longer of 5 yrs or period of EQUITABLE DEFENSES
payments; other – 3 yrs after presumed reas. UNCLEAN HANDS: P denied equitable relief if P engaged in
Area: where employer does business during relationship & total area misconduct closely related to claim (bad faith).
reas or list of specific competitors prohibited. LACHES: unreas delay in pursuing equitable relief caused D prej.
Scope: type of business; solicitation of business from customers w/ EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL: (1) intentional or grossly negligent, (2)
mat contacts; non-disclosure of conf’l info. deception by P, (3) misleads D, & (4) D relies to D’s detriment.

You might also like