[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
335 views18 pages

Biochar and Hydrochar As Adsorbents For The Removal

This document provides a review of biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HC) as adsorbents for removing contaminants of emerging concern from wastewater. BC and HC are carbon materials produced from the pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization of biomass, respectively. They have properties like surface area and porosity that allow for effective adsorption of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and other organic pollutants from water. The document discusses production methods for BC and HC from different biomass sources, as well as their characterization and use as adsorbents to remove various water contaminants.

Uploaded by

AHMED
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
335 views18 pages

Biochar and Hydrochar As Adsorbents For The Removal

This document provides a review of biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HC) as adsorbents for removing contaminants of emerging concern from wastewater. BC and HC are carbon materials produced from the pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization of biomass, respectively. They have properties like surface area and porosity that allow for effective adsorption of pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and other organic pollutants from water. The document discusses production methods for BC and HC from different biomass sources, as well as their characterization and use as adsorbents to remove various water contaminants.

Uploaded by

AHMED
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

BIOCHAR AND HYDROCHAR AS ADSORBENTS FOR THE REMOVAL


OF CONTAMINANTS OF EMERGING CONCERN FROM WASTEWATER
Aleksandra Adamović1, Mirjana Petronijević2*, Sanja Panić2, Dragan Cvetković1,
Igor Antić2, Zoran Petrović3, Nataša Đurišić-Mladenović2 (MINI-REVIEW PAPER)
UDC 631.878:628.316.12
DOI: 10.5937/savteh2301057A
1University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, Leskovac, Serbia
2University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
3University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Technology, Zvornik, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Carbon materials have been used extensively in water treatment, and among
them, biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HC) have been studied in recent decades as
eco-friendly adsorbents in water treatment. Specific physicochemical characteris­
tics of chars allow for the effective removal of a wide range of water contaminants, Keywords: biochar, hydrochar, adsorp­
including emerging contaminants (e.g. pharmaceutically active compounds, agro­ tion, contaminants of emerging concern
chemicals, and endocrine disrupting compounds). BC and HC can be synthesized (CECs), water treatment
from different biomass sources, even from biowaste, which makes them low-cost
materials. In fact, the application of waste biomass for char production can be
designated as a promising way towards achieving sustainable development goals
concerning solid waste management. The selection of feedstock material and op­
timization of the reaction conditions of the carbonization process (pyrolysis, hydro­
thermal carbonisation, etc.) influence the performances of char-based materials
leading to the products with desired characteristics suitable for the removal of a
certain group of compounds. The objective of this review is to provide an overview
of the current status of research regarding the use of BC and HC as adsorbents in
the removal of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) from wastewater. The
physicochemical properties of the substrates, types of synthesis, characterization
techniques, as well as mechanism and influence of process parameters in the
removal of selected CECs from wastewater, will also be addressed.

Introduction

Population growth demands the invention of new and human health, as well as the impact of their decom­
technologies and/or the improvement of existing ones in position and transformation products, is still unknown.
order to provide enough energy and food for mankind. At The majority of these compounds are not covered by
the same time, constant industrialization is among the environmental quality standards (EQS) based on annual
main sources of harmful pollutants in the environment. average (AA-EQS) and maximum allowable (MAC-EQS)
An indispensable product of industrial and living activi­ concentrations defined by Directive 2013/39/EU under
ties is the production and discharge of wastewater con­ the currently active European Union (EU) water legis­
taining various contaminants. Contaminants that can be lation, the Water Framework Directive (WFD, 2000/60/
found in wastewater are pharmaceutically active com­ EC) [3]. Only for a limited number of pharmaceutically
pounds, currently used pesticides, endocrine-disrupting active compounds, does the appropriate data exist on
compounds, phenols, X-ray contrasting agents, food ad­ ecotoxicity that is adequate for risk assessment. The
ditives, surfactants, personal care products, veterinary European regulation failed to impose allowed limits for
products, steroids and engineered nanomaterials. Most CECs presence in the environment with the exception of
of the mentioned organic contaminants have been iden­ some compounds (five pharmaceuticals, one synthetic
tified as potentially dangerous to environmental health and two natural hormones, one antioxidant and one or­
and/or humans recently. The commonly accepted name ganic UV filter, and eight pesticides) listed under the EU
for such compounds is compounds of emerging con­ Watch List for Which Predicted No-Effect Concentrations
cerns, CECs. CECs enter the environment in different (PNECs) where established [4].
pathways. These contaminants can be found in surface There are several techniques that could be used
waters in a wide concentration range (from a few ng/L to for organic contaminants removal from water matrices,
μg/L), and up to a few mg/L in wastewater [1, 2]. However, such as different oxidation processes, coagulation, ad­
the impact of all these components on the environment sorption, etc. However, liquid-solid adsorption stands out

*Author address: Mirjana Petronijević, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technology Novi Sad,
Bulevar cara Lazara 1, Novi Sad, Serbia;
email: mirjana.petronijevic@uns.ac.rs
The manuscript received: February, 20, 2023.
Paper accepted: June, 12, 2023.

57
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

among them as an economically profitable process that residues, can all be utilized to produce high-quality chars
can be used to achieve a high degree of pollutant re­ [14, 20]. BC produced from lignocellulosic biomass at
moval [5]. At the same time, adsorption is a technologi­ temperatures ≥500 °C is characterized by a high content
cally simple process that could be easily implemented as of carbon (>60%) and low to medium ash content (10-
a new one or within the existing water treatment systems. 21%) [20]. In contrast, BC produced from animal manure
The efficiency of pollutant removal by adsorption occurs has high ash content (48-67%) and a very high pH value
on active sites located on the surface of the adsorbent due to the inorganic materials present in the biomass
material. Numerous factors, including temperature, pH, sources [9, 20]. HCs derived from different lignocellu­
and adsorbate concentration, can influence the capacity losic biomass (crop and forestry residues) are mostly
of the adsorption process. Fluctuations of these factors characterized by low ash content (up to 13%) [14]. The
can also result in the desorption of pollutants from the total carbon content in the structure of HCs obtained
surface back into the water [6]. The primary mechanisms from lignocellulosic biomass is high (38-91%) [14]. HCs
involved in the adsorption of organics are hydrophobic obtained from non-lignocellulosic biomass (e.g. sewage
and electrostatic interactions, the formation of hydrogen sludge), are characterized by a wide range of ash (23-
bonds, partitioning, pore-filling, and π-π interactions be­ 82%) and the total carbon content (11-85%) [14]. The
tween the adsorbent and organic pollutant molecules [7]. application of waste biomass for char production can
Carbon materials represent a group of very important be designated as a promising way towards achieving
cost-effective and eco-friendly sustainable adsorbents sustainable development goals in relation to solid waste
with high efficacy for organic pollutants removal [6, 8-10]. management.
Biochar (BC) and hydrochar (HC) are carbon materials This review aims to provide the latest research data in
obtained by dry/wet carbonization of biomaterial, respec­ the area of CECs removal from water matrices using BC,
tively. In general, characteristics such as specific surface HC and their composites. The methods for preparation
area (SSA) and porosity are significantly higher for BC and physicochemical characterization of BC and HC are
than HC. However, those parameters are affected by the comprehensively reviewed, along with the adsorption
type of raw material and reaction conditions. Still, there mechanisms of organic pollutants (pesticides, pharma­
are cases where HC with a high SSA is also obtained, or ceutics, etc.) on the appropriate chars.
HCs have to be activated. For example, authors Kabakcı
and Baran synthetized HC from different lignocellulosic PRODUCTION OF BIOCHAR AND HYDROCHAR
biowastes (wood sawdust, olive pomace, walnut shell, The most widely used biomass conversion technique
apricot seed, tea stalk, hazelnut husk) [11]. The HCs for the production of BC is pyrolysis. Formation of BC
yield was in the range of 55.7-71%, and the SSA of HCs also follows the process of biomass gasification, but in
after KOH activation was 308.9-666.7 m2/g [11]. Car­ much lower yields than is the case for pyrolysis. On the
bonization encompasses a variety of technologies which other hand, HCs are primarily produced through hydro­
can be classified into three main processes - pyrolysis, thermal processes such as HTC and HTL. The reaction
hydrothermal processes and gasification [12, 13]. BC conditions such as temperature, pH, heating rate, resi­
is produced by pyrolysis in the absence of oxygen and dence time, substrate concentration and feedstock type
generates bio-oil and combustible gas as by-products. play significant roles in the carbonization process, influ­
On the other hand, HC is obtained from hydrothermal encing yield and physicochemical characteristics of the
processes, such as hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) produced chars. The parallel between the two mean car­
and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) [10, 13]. The pro­ bonisation processes and obtained products is present
duction of HCs is significantly higher when using the in Figure 1.
HTC method (12-91% from lignocellulosic biomass and
31-94% from sewage sludge) [14], compared to HTL Pyrolysis
(16-38% from lignocellulosic biomass [14] and 29-43% Pyrolysis represents a method for producing BC from
from soils [16]). The advantage of the hydrothermal pro­ biomass due to its versatility and effectiveness. This ther­
cess in relation to pyrolysis is that wet biomass can be mal decomposition process is carried out at high tempera­
used directly, without the need for drying. The yield and tures (typically 400-800 °C) without the presence of oxy­
characteristics of chars largely depend on the conditions gen [21]. This process breaks down the natural polymers
of the applied process (pressure, temperature, reactor present in biomass such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and
design, heating rate, residence time, and the nature of lignin, resulting in the production of biochar, bio-oil, and
the raw biomaterial) [14, 17, 18]. Also, the properties of non-condensable gases [22, 23]. Natural polymers un­
chars could be tailored by using different catalysts during dergo several transformations [23], such as disintegration,
their production [19]. cross-linking, and then fragmentation [24]. Hemicellulose
Biomass from a wide range of sources can be used decomposes at temperatures between 200-260 °C, fol­
to produce both BC and HC with favourable characteris­ lowed by cellulose (240-350 °C), and lignin (280-500 °C)
tics. Lignocellulosic biomass, such as crop and forestry [25]. Pyrolysis can be classified into different categories
residues, as well as non-lignocellulosic materials, such based on product requirements, operating conditions, and
as sewage sludge, algae, sugar, hair, bone, and meat feedstock type, which are described below.

58  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Figure 1. Main characteristics of chars produced by pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization.

Slow pyrolysis is a conventional method performed nomic viability [33].


at temperatures < 700 °C and is characterized by a long
retention time (>1 h) and a slow heating rate (5–7 °C/ Gasification
min). The main product at the end of the process is BC Unlike pyrolysis, gasification is a thermochemical
(35–45% yield), along with bio-oil (25–35% yield) and process that includes the degradation of carbonaceous
gas products (20–30% yield) [26-28]. feedstock at high temperatures, typically ranging be­
Fast pyrolysis is popular in the biofuels industry and is tween 700-1500 °C. The process takes place in the
characterized by high reaction temperatures (300–1000 °C), presence of an oxygen-based gasification agent (air,
high heating rates (typically >300 °C/min) and short re­ pure oxygen, steam, etc.) [18, 28, 34, 35]. While bio­
tention time (<2 s) [29]. Primarily, it is used in the biofuel mass conversion to BC via gasification is possible, it is
industry to produce bio-oil (65-70% yield), while BC and not commonly reported, as the primary product of gasi­
gas yields are lower (10% and 20%, respectively) [28]. fication is syngas (i.e. H2, CO, CO2, CH4), with a yield of
Flash or ultra-fast pyrolysis represents an improved type approximately 85% [28]. Biochar and bio-oil are consid­
of fast pyrolysis utilizing a higher heating rate (>1000 °C/s) ered by-products with a much lower yield (10% and 5%,
and a very short reaction time (0.1-1 s). The reaction respectively) [18, 28, 34].
temperature can vary between 700-1000 °C (even up
to 1200 °C) [30]. The main product of flash pyrolysis of Hydrothermal carbonization
biomass is bio-oil (70-80% yield), while BC and gas are In contrast to the aforementioned thermochemical
obtained in a markedly lower percentage (10-15 and methods of char production, hydrothermal processes
5-20%, respectively) [28, 31]. Bio-oil is viscous and con­ for biomass conversion involve suspending biomass in
tains high levels of oxygen-containing compounds [33] water under moderate temperature conditions, typically be­
and it can be used as a bioliquid for heating or as biofuel tween 180-350 °C and at pressures ranging from 2-22 MPa
in transport, but after appropriate treatment [32]. [36, 37]. These processes are characterized by relatively
The main product obtained through slow pyrolysis is short retention times (5-240 min) and involve a series
biochar, while bio-oil is the main product of flash pyroly­ of reactions such as decarboxylation, dehydration, con­
sis. Generally, the yield of bio-oil increases as the forma­ densation, and hydrolysis, which are initiated by the
tion of biochar decreases, irrespective of the pyrolysis presence of water in a subcritical state [38]. The primary
method employed, whether it is slow, intermediate, fast, product of HTC is a solid residue (HC), which accounts
or flash pyrolysis. On the other hand, the gas fraction for 35-80% of the product yield [37]. Other by-products
does not exhibit significant variations among different include liquid bio-oil and gases, mainly consisting of CO2
conventional pyrolysis techniques. Notably, the introduc­ and CO [39].
tion of catalysts alters the distribution and composition of When biomass is subjected to hydrothermal process­
the pyrolysis products, typically promoting deoxygena­ es, hemicellulose is broken down into oligosaccharides,
tion reactions. The techno-economic analysis demon­ pentoses and hexoses, while cellulose breaks down into
strates the potential for scaling up the pyrolysis process. hexose. The process of converting monosaccharides
However, current research on this topic remains frag­ into furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural involves several
mented, with limited comprehensive studies that com­ reactions, including ring opening, intramolecular cycliza­
pare conventional, advanced, and emerging approaches tion, dehydration, etc. [40]. Polymerization of furfural and
to biomass pyrolysis from an economic perspective. This hydroxymethylfurfural results in the formation of hydro­
highlights the need for extensive research in the future carbon microstructures. The hydrochar network is cre­
to address this gap and provide a more comprehensive ated through solid-solid conversions of the unhydrolyzed
understanding of biomass pyrolysis in terms of its eco­ fraction of cellulose and hemicellulose, as well as lignin

59
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

[40]. Due to its low solubility in water, lignin, an amor­ CHARACTERIZATION OF BIOCHAR AND HYDROCHAR
phous heteropolymer, undergoes hydrolysis to form sol­ The properties of BC and HC are influenced by sev­
uble fragments, including aromatic monomers, dimers, eral factors including the raw material, synthesis process,
and oligomers. This hydrolysis process plays a limiting and reaction conditions. To assess the quality of the ob­
factor in determining the formation of secondary char. tained chars and determine their potential application,
The remaining insoluble lignin undergoes mild dehydra­ it is necessary to carry out their detailed characteriza­
tion and decarboxylation reactions, resulting in the for­ tion (e.g. SSA, porosity, and elemental composition). To
mation of pyrolysis char [41]. Hydrochars derived from achieve this, various instrumental techniques need to
non-lignocellulosic biomass, such as sewage sludge, be applied. A thorough understanding of the relationship
typically exhibit characteristics such as low heating val­ between the production conditions and physicochemical
ue, low surface area, limited dewatering ability, and high properties of the chars is essential for their optimal uti­
concentrations of heavy metals [14]. lization.
Temperature plays a crucial role in the hydrothermal
process, as it directly affects the conversion of biomass Characterization techniques
to HC. Higher temperatures lead to higher conversion The properties of chars can be classified into four
rates of biomass to HC, but this is accompanied by a re­ main categories: chemical properties, physical proper­
duction in the HC yield and an increase in bio-oil and gas ties, surface structure and morphology, and thermal
yields [40]. Increasing the residence time of biomass in stability properties [9]. The instrumental techniques that
the process also influences the conversion rate similarly are most often used in the characterization of chars are
to temperature [42]. present in Table 1.
However, the improvement of the quality of HCs,
such as sewage sludge-derived HCs, can be done by Table 1. Instrumental techniques for char characterization
applying the HTC process that involves treating two dif­ (modified from [9, 12, 20])
ferent raw materials simultaneously (Co-HTC). During
Co-HTC, the interaction between these raw materials
leads to synergistic effects. This approach offers several
advantages over single-feedstock HTC. It overcomes
the limitations of relying solely on a single feedstock,
mitigates any undesirable characteristics of individual
raw materials, etc. [14].

Hydrothermal liquefaction
Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is a process that in­
volves the use of supercritical water and high tempera­
tures (250–375 °C) and pressure (10–22 MPa) to convert
biomass into bio-oil, with relatively low yields of HC and
gas [40]. The yield of HC is dependent on various factors, Biochar and hydrochar properties
such as feedstock characteristics and reaction condi­ BC and HC show different physical and chemical
tions, and can reach up to 15% [43]. However, there are properties that significantly affect their potential applica­
examples where by using HTL a high yield of HC was tion. It is important to note that BC and HC have unique
obtained. Ahmad et al (2019) subjected the antibiotic fer­ properties that vary depending on several factors, such
mentative residue (lincomycin residue) to microwave-as­ as the type of biomass used, the reaction temperature,
sisted hydrothermal liquefaction and obtained HC yield and the residence time [46]. The synthesis process in­
in the range of 45-93% [44]. The effect of temperature volves complex chemical reactions, leading to signifi­
on biomass components can differ in HTL, with cellulose, cant differences in the physicochemical properties of BC
hemicellulose, and lignin reacting differently to temper­ and HC. Table 2 and Table 3 provide a summary of the
ature changes [37]. The reaction conditions of the HTL characteristics of BCs and HCs derived from various bio­
process also have a significant impact on the resulting mass. It is crucial to understand the correlation between
products. Panchal et al. (2017) found that increasing the char production conditions and their properties to deter­
temperature from 250 °C to 350 °C led to a decrease in mine their potential applications accurately. The relation
the yield of bio-oil, while increasing the pressure from 10 between the characteristics of BC/HC and their potential
MPa to 22 MPa led to an increase in the yield of bio-oil. application is shown in Figure 2.
Additionally, the composition and properties of the bio-oil
were found to be affected by the reaction conditions, with
higher temperatures leading to a higher concentration
of oxygen-containing compounds and lower concentra­
tions of nitrogen-containing compounds [45].

60  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Figure 2. Characteristics of chars important to its potential applications.

The composition of char is highly dependent on the achieved, resulting in chars with low heating value (HV)
feedstock used for its synthesis, with lignocellulosic [48]. As the reaction temperature increases, the HV of
waste biomass being the most common. The amounts the char increases. This happens because, at higher
of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin present in the temperatures, cellulose and hemicellulose are broken
feedstock greatly influence the composition of the result­ down, leaving lignin, which has a higher heating value.
ing char. Moisture (MO), ash, volatile matter (VM), and HC has a higher heating value compared to BC, due to
fixed carbon (FC) content in both BC and HC are mainly the presence of more volatile and oxygen-containing
determined by the feedstock composition (Tables 2 and functional groups. During HTC, which is performed in an
3). Industrial waste-derived BCs have higher ash con­ aqueous medium at milder temperatures, hemicellulose
tent compared to other feedstocks. The VM content can is degraded faster [49]. In contrast, BC produced via py­
range from 24.9% to 78.3%, the ash content from 2.9% rolysis has a lower heating value due to the removal of
to 65.7%, and the FC content can be up to 54.8% in vari­ oxidative functional groups during the process, resulting
ous feedstock-derived BCs (Table 2). HC is produced in in a more carbon-rich material. The atomic ratio of H/C
an aqueous medium, and therefore, inorganic substanc­ and O/C for HC is higher compared to those for BC [50].
es from the biomass are removed resulting in lower ash The temperature used in the synthesis process has a
content, while pyrolysis-derived BC retains the minerals significant impact on the physical and chemical proper­
present in the feedstock [47]. Depending on the initial ties of both BC and HC. BC produced at temperatures
biomass, the largest part of HC represents VM (16.8– around 500-600 °C is mainly aromatic and has a graph­
83.8%) and ash (0.1–82.0%), while FC ranges from 0.1 ite-like structure. In contrast, HC produced at lower tem­
to 53.9% (Table 3). In general, the highest percentage of peratures about 200-250 °C contains residues more alkyl
VM is present in HC obtained from algae, wood, and ur­ in nature [51]. BC synthesized at moderate temperatures
ban waste; while the highest yield of FC was measured may possess O and N functional groups on its surface,
in HC derived from wood waste biomass. while BC produced at temperatures over 700 °C becomes
The reaction temperature and duration of the reac­ hydrophobic and resistant to degradation due to the loss
tion have a significant influence on the physicochemical of almost all O and H in its structure [17]. Considering
properties and yield of BC and HC. There is a correlation that it is produced at low temperatures, the greater pres­
between the applied reaction temperature and HC yield ence of oxygen groups on the surface of HC contributes
and carbon conversion. When the synthesis takes place to its acidic character compared to BC, which is alkaline
at low temperatures and with a short retention time, a in nature. Additionally, BCs have an alkaline pH due to
high yield of char occurs, but a low carbon conversion is the high content of inorganic carbonates and ash. BCs

61
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

have a large SSA and pore volume [52, 53], which in­ alized char can selectively adsorb target contaminants
creases with increasing temperature. BC with high SSA from water. Alkaline activation (with sodium hydroxide
(up to 1570 m2/g) is usually obtained from agro-waste and potassium hydroxide) can enhance the SSA of char
and lignocellulose biomass (Table 2). The BC with ex­ and attach oxygenated functional groups to its surface.
tremely low SSA (0.59 m2/g) reported in the literature This type of modification results in a positive charge cre­
was groundnut char. The hydrochars derived from agro- ated on the surface of the char which in turn helps in the
biowaste are characterized by high SSA and pore volumes adsorption of negatively charged pollutants. For exam­
amounting up to 667 m2/g and 0.39 cm3/g, respectively ple, surface-modified human hair-derived BC, resulting
(Table 3) [11]. The lowest SSA was recorded for HCs in a high porosity with an SSA of 3015 m2/g, exhibited
derived from industrial waste. enhanced adsorption performance for various organic
BC and HC were found to be effective adsorbents pollutants [89].
in water treatment. However, in order to improve their Impregnation of metals or metal oxides (such as ZnO,
adsorption capacity and selectivity, these chars are of­ Fe, CuO, and Fe3O4) into the carbon structure can also
ten subjected to activation/functionalization steps. The improve its adsorption characteristics (Table 4). Further­
characteristics of some BC/HC-based adsorbents after more, BC and HC in this form can be used as catalysts in
modification are shown in Table 4. advanced processes [58, 59, 90]. Metals or metal oxides
Activation can be achieved through physical or chem­ (especially Fe) impregnated chars are used in heteroge­
ical treatments that increase the char's porosity and neous Fenton/Fenton-like processes for water treatment
surface area, resulting in enhanced adsorption capacity. [59, 65, 90, 94]. Metal oxide/char composites have found
Physical activation (thermal or dry activation) involves their application in photocatalytic processes [58], as well
heating the char in the presence of steam or CO2, while as in persulfate oxidation processes [43, 63]. Magnetic
chemical activation implies the utilization of chemical particles can be enriched by chars in order to effectively
activation agents and mostly includes acid modification, utilize them as adsorbents [91-93]. After treatment, they
alkaline modification, metal salts, and/or oxidizing agent can be easily separated from water using an external
modification [9]. Acid activation (with sulphuric acid, hy­ magnetic field.
drochloric acid, nitric acid, oxalic acid, phosphorous acid,
and citric acid) is necessary to modify the char surface
by introducing acid functional groups and eliminating
metallic impurities. Consequently, the obtained function­

Table 2. Characterization of BC produced from various feedstocks (modified from [54, 55]).

62  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Table 3. Characteristics of HC derived from different feedstocks (modified from [14, 66]).

63
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Table 4. Characteristics of different BC/HC-based composites.

ADSORPTION MECHANISM OF CECs REMOVAL the π aromatic char system behaves like an electron ac­
USING BC/HC-BASED MATERIALS ceptor, while if it was prepared at a temperature >500 °C,
The heterogeneous structure of BC and HC allows the char behaves like a donor [99, 100]. The presence of
them to remove organic pollutants from water through functional groups (e.g. hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, and
various adsorption mechanisms, including physical ad­ amine) on the surface of chars increases the adsorption
sorption, precipitation and complexation, and pore filling affinity of organic contaminants onto char.
[95]. The adsorption efficiency is influenced by several The adsorption mechanism by hydrophobic interac­
factors, such as the pH, ionic strength, and polarity of the tions is characteristic of the hydrophobic and neutral or­
organic pollutant. ganic compounds due to their highly hydrophobic nature.
Electrostatic interactions primarily occur between Chars that have been prepared at high temperatures
ionisable organic compounds and the positively charged show a greater affinity for pollutant binding through hy­
surface of BC. The efficiency of adsorption using elec­ drophobic interactions. At high synthesis temperatures,
trostatic interactions is influenced by the pH and ionic there is a loss of functional groups containing oxygen
strength of the water matrices [96]. and hydrogen, which makes char more aromatic and
Adsorption of organic contaminants onto char using hydrophobic, and therefore more suitable for removing
the pore filling mechanism depends on several factors, hydrophobic organic pollutants [101].
including the total volume of micropores and mesopores In general, the adsorption of pollutants from water
of the char, the type and nature of the char, as well as matrices by BC/HC depends on the characteristics of
the polarity of the organic pollutant. High efficiency of the both pollutants and adsorbents and process conditions,
process is achieved when adsorbents with a low content involving various mechanisms. Pore filling, hydrogen
of volatile matter are applied and used to treat low-pol­ bonding, and π–π interactions with the surface of the
luted samples [97]. char are the possible mechanisms for antibiotics re­
The adsorption of organic contaminants by the parti­ moval [115, 116]. The adsorption of endocrine-disrupting
tioning mechanism takes place by diffusion of adsorbate chemicals, in addition to the mechanism of π–π interac­
into the pores of the non-carbonized part of the char and tions, hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding,
interaction with it. This mechanism is more efficient us­ also includes electrostatic interactions [124].
ing char with a high content of volatile substances and in
the cases treating effluents with a high concentration of Factors affecting the efficiency of organic pollutants
organic pollutants [98]. removal
Adsorption of aromatic compounds usually takes The efficiency of removing pollutants from water us­
place via the electron donor/acceptor interaction mecha­ ing BC/HC as adsorbents depends on a lot of factors. In
nism on chars that have a structure similar to graphene, addition to the properties of the chars and the nature of
which is affected by the char production temperature. In the organic pollutants, the operating reaction conditions
the case of char synthesized at temperatures <500 °C, of the process have a great influence on the efficiency,

64  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

such as adsorbent content, pH, temperature, presence Utilizing KOH-activated BC, high adsorption capaci­
of other constituents of water (e.g. ions) [ 9, 102-104]. ties of tetracycline, oxytetracycline and chlortetracycline
The content of adsorbent, as well as the initial content have been achieved amounting to 476.19 mg/g, 407.5
of contaminants, affects the adsorption efficiency. The mg/g and 555.6 mg/g, respectively [113]. It is known
degree of pollutants removal from water increases with that the adsorption capacities of BC increase at higher
increasing adsorbent content, until the optimal value of temperatures of the carbonization process [117]. On
the adsorbent dosage is reached. By increasing the con­ the other hand, mesoporous HC derived from potatoes
tent beyond the optimal value no further improvements in through the soft-template method showed a maximum
pollutant removal can be achieved [102]. This tendency adsorption capacity of tetracycline of 238.7 mg/g [115].
could be justified by the optimal utilization of active ad­ The authors attributed this success to adsorption mecha­
sorption sites [105]. The efficiency of the adsorption pro­ nisms: pore filling, hydrogen bonding and n-π interaction.
cess decreases as the initial pollutant content increases NaOH-activated HC has been reported to effectively
[103] and as the activation centres on the surface of the remove sulfamethoxazole. The authors emphasized that
adsorbent become occupied by the pollutant molecules the pore filling, charge-assisted strong hydrogen bond­
[106]. The removal efficiency of organic contaminants ing, and π–π interactions with the surface of HC are the
from water by adsorption is significantly affected by the possible mechanisms [116]. Moreover, using NaOH-
initial pH of the solution due to certain charge character­ modified BC derived from Anthriscus sylvestris phar­
istics of the adsorbent surface determined by the pro­ maceuticals such as diclofenac and cephalexin could
tonation and deprotonating of oxygen functional groups also be effectively removed (adsorption capacities were
[107]. Furthermore, the pH of the solution also affects 392.9 mg/g and 724.5 mg/g, respectively) [118].
the ionization level of the pollutants [108]. At a pH be­ The removal of pesticides (e.g. atrazine, simazine,
low the PZC, the surface of the adsorbent carries a net etc.) from water by using char-based sorbents was also
positive charge, and therefore, it attracts and adsorbs investigated [119-121]. Pyrochar has shown a high ad­
negatively charged anions. Conversely, when the pH is sorption capacity for atrazine and simazine with values
above the PZC it is more favourable to adsorb positively of 1158 mg/kg and 243 mg/kg, respectively [119]. KOH-
charged ions [109]. This phenomenon is due to the in­ activated HC derived from sewage sludge showed up to
teraction between the charged functional groups present 64% removal of terbuthylazine from water [120]. Utiliza­
on the surface of the adsorbent and the charged groups tion of unmodified HCs derived from different feedstocks
of the pollutants in the solution. as adsorbents for removing 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic
The effect of temperature on the adsorption capac­ was reported, having adsorption capacities up to 88, 90
ity of char can vary depending on the specific pollutant and 89 mg/g, respectively [121].
and the characteristics of the char. Increasing the tem­ Endocrine disrupting chemicals, EDCs (such as bi­
perature can enhance the adsorption capacity of BC for sphenol A) are contaminants that can impact the endo­
certain organic pollutants, such as p-nitrophenol and crine system and subsequently impair the development
diclofenac, through an endothermic process [104, 110]. and fertility of animals and humans. These components
This is because an increase in temperature can lead to can be effectively removed from water using HC as an
an increase in the kinetic energy of the molecules, allow­ adsorbent [122, 123]. Adsorption of EDCs by HC de­
ing for a more efficient adsorption process. However, for pends on the characteristics of both pollutants and HCs,
other pollutants and types of char, increasing the tem­ and process conditions, involving various mechanisms,
perature may have an exothermic effect, which can re­ such as electrostatic interactions, π–π interactions, hy­
duce the adsorption capacity [111, 112]. drophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding [124].

Examples of CECs removal from water using BC/HC-


based materials as adsorbents
BC and HC have a high affinity for the adsorption of
organic pollutants. Tables 5 and 6 show summarized lit­
erature data on the effectiveness of BC, HC and their
composites in removing organic pollutants, such as anti­
biotics, pesticides, etc. from water matrices.
Antibiotics have an important function in medication;
however, their presence in the environment is undesira­
ble due to their negative impacts on health and the envi­
ronment. Antibiotics (such as tetracycline, sulfamethoxa­
zole, cefotaxime, sulfadiazine, etc.) can be effectively
removed from water matrices using BC and HC as ad­
sorbents [113-116]. In order to improve their efficiency
as adsorbents, it is necessary to perform their activation
using acids or alkaline [113].

65
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Table 5. BC-based adsorbents applied for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater.

Table 6. HC-based adsorbents applied for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater.

66  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Conclusion microorganisms. Water. 2021, 13, 520-532. https://doi.


org/10.3390/w13040520
BC and HC are carbon materials produced from bio­ [3] Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and
mass either via pyrolysis or hydrothermal processes, of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives
2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority
representing eco-friendly and cost-effective adsorbents
substances in the field of water policy, Off. J. Eur. Union.
for the removal of emerging contaminants from different 2013, 226, 1–17
water matrices. By choosing the raw material, as well as [4] Decision 495/2015/EU of 20 March 2015 establishing a
by optimizing the reaction conditions of the carboniza­ watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the
tion process (pyrolysis, HTC, etc.), it is possible to influ­ field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of
ence the obtaining of HC/BC with certain characteristics the European Parliament and of the Council, Off. J. Eur.
suitable for removing target pollutants from water. The Union. 2015, 78, 40–42
removal mechanism (e.g. electrostatic interaction, pore [5] Kim S, Nam SN, Jang A, Jang M, Park CM, Son A, Her
filling, partitioning, electron donor/acceptor interaction, N, Heo J, Yoon Y. Review of adsorption–membrane
hybrid systems for water and wastewater treatment.
hydrophobic interactions) that will take place depends
Chemosphere. 2022, 286, 131916. https://doi.
on the characteristics of the adsorbent itself, as well as org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131916
the type of pollutant. If biowaste is used for BC and HC [6] Nguyen DLT, Binh QA, Nguyen XC, Nguyen TTH, Vo QN,
production, it has an additional value in reducing the en­ Nguyen TD, Tran TCP, Nguyen TAH, Kim SY, Nguyen TP,
vironmental problems linked to waste disposal. BC and Bae J, Kim IT, Le QV. Metal salt-modified biochars derived
HC could be also considered as a way of removing car­ from agro-waste for effective congo red dye removal.
bon from the geochemical carbon cycle, particularly if Environmental Research. 2021, 200, 111492, https://doi.
the spent char-based adsorbent could be incorporated org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111492
into other materials. Further research is needed in order [7] Abbas Z, Ali S, Rizwan M, Zaheer IE, Malik A, Riaz MA,
Shahid MR, ur Rehman MZ, Al-Wabel MI. A critical review
to fully understand the particularities of each adsorption
of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic
process. Factors, such as the type of adsorbent used, and inorganic contaminants through biochar, Arabian
activation methods, target contaminants, and process Journal of Geosciences. 2018, 11, 448-470. https://doi.
conditions can lead to different efficiencies. Additionally, org/10.1007/s12517-018-3790-1
in real-life scenarios, the presence of multiple emerging [8] Petronijević M, Panić S, Savić S, Agbaba J, Molnar Jazić
contaminants may have a synergistic effect on the ad­ J, Milanović M, Đurišić-Mladenović N. Characterization
sorption process. Therefore, it is also important to con­ and application of biochar-immobilized crude horseradish
duct comprehensive research in this direction. peroxidase for removal of phenol from water. Colloids and
Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 2021, 208, 112038. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112038
Acknowledgements
[9] Zeghioud H, Fryda L, Djelal H, Assadi A, Kane A. A
comprehensive review of biochar in the removal of organic
This study is conducted under the project TwiNSol- pollutants from wastewater: Characterization, toxicity,
CECs which has received funding from the Horizon Eu­ activation/functionalization and influencing treatment
rope programme under grant agreement no.101059867. factors, Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2022, 47
Views and opinions expressed are however those of the 102801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102801
author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the [10] Ighalo JO, Rangabhashiyam S, Dulta K, Umeh CT,
European Union or EU executive agency. Neither the Iwuozor KO, Aniagor CO, Eshiemogie SO, Iwuchukwu FU,
European Union nor the granting authority can be held Igwegbe CA. Recent advances in hydrochar application
for the adsorptive removal of wastewater pollutants,
responsible for them.
Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2022, 184,
Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the 419–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.06.028
support of the Ministry of Science, Technological Devel­ [11] Kabakcı SB, Baran SS. Hydrothermal carbonization of
opment and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia under various lignocellulosics: fuel characteristics of hydrochars
Grant 451-03-68/2022-14/200134, 451-03-47/2023- and surface characteristics of activated hydrochars.
01/200134 and 451-03-47/2023-01/200133. Waste Management. 2019, 100, 259–268. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.021.
References [12] Yaashikaa PR, Kumar PS, Varjani S, Saravanan A. A
critical review of the biochar production techniques,
[1] Antić I, Škrbić BD, Matamoros V, Bayona JM. Does the characterization, stability and applications for circular
application of human waste as a fertilization material in bioeconomy. Biotechnology Reports. 2020, 28, e00570.
agricultural production pose adverse effects on human https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00570
health attributable to contaminants of emerging concern? [13] Hesham A, Awad Y, Jahin H, El-Korashy S, Maher S,
Environmental Research. 2020,182, 109132. doi: Kalill H, Khairy G. Hydrochar for industrial wastewater
10.1016/j.envres.2020.109132. Epub 2020 Jan 11. PMID: treatment: An Overview of its advantages and applications.
32069746 Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology. 2021,
[2] Dionísio J, Gonçalves C, Guedes P, Ribeiro AB, Couto 11. DOI: 10.37421/2161-0525.21.11.626
N. Electrochemical treatment of effluent for the removal [14] Cavali M, Libardi Junior N, de Sena JD, Woiciechowski
of contaminants of emergent concern and culturable AL, Soccol CR, Filho PB, Bayard R, Benbelkacem

67
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

H, de Castilhos Junior AB. A review on hydrothermal paper sludge and biochar addition on brown peat and coir-
carbonization of potential biomass wastes, based growing media properties. Scientia Horticulturae.
characterization and environmental applications of 2015, 193, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.
hydrochar, and biorefinery perspectives of the process. SCIENTA.2015.07.032
Science of the Total Environment. 2023, 857, 159627. [27] Liu WJ, Jiang H, Yu HQ. Development of biochar-based
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159627 functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon
[15] Li C, Yang X, Zhang Z, Zhou D, Zhang L, Zhang S, material. Chemical Reviews. 2015, 115, 12251–12285;
Chen J. Hydrothermal liquefaction of desert shrub https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195
Salix psammophila to high value-added chemicals and [28] Ambaye TG, Vaccari M, van Hullebusch ED, Amrane A,
hydrochar with recycled processing water. BioResources. Rtimi S. Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of biochar
2013, 8, 2981-2997. DOI: 10.15376/biores.8.2.2981-2997 for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants
[16] Amar VS, Houck JD, Maddipudi B, Penrod TA, Shell from industrial wastewater. International Journal of
KM, Thakkar A, Shende AR, Hernandez S, Kumar S, Environmental Science and Technology. 2021, 18, 3273–
Gupta RB, Shende RV. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) 3294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-03060-w
processing of unhydrolyzed solids (UHS) for hydrochar [29] Roy P, Dias G. Prospects for pyrolysis technologies
and its use for asymmetric supercapacitors with mixed in the bioenergy sector: A review. Renewable and
(Mn, Ti)-Perovskite oxides. Renewable Energy. 2021, 173, Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017, 77, 59–69. https://doi.
329-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.126 org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.136
[17] Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P. Biochar [30] Li L, Rowbotham JS, Greenwell CH, Dyer PW. An
physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and introduction to pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis: Versatile
feedstock kind effects. Reviews in Environmental Science techniques for biomass conversion. In: New and future
and Bio/Technology. 2020, 19, 191–215. https://doi. developments in catalysis: catalytic biomass conversion.
org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3 Amsterdam, Elsevier. 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
[18] Jeyasubramanian K, Thangagiri B, Sakthivel A, Raja B978-0-444-53878-9.00009-6
JD, Seenivasan S, Vallinayagam P, Madhavan D, Devi [31] Balat M. Mechanisms of thermochemical biomass
SM, Rathika B. A complete review of biochar: production, conversion processes. Part 1: Reactions of pyrolysis
property, multifaceted applications, interaction mechanism mechanisms of thermochemical biomass conversion
and computational approach. Fuel. 2021, 292, 120243. processes. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120243 and Environmental Effects. 2008, 7036, 620–635. https://
[19] Wang Y, Yu Y, Huang H, Yu C, Fang H, Zhou C, Yin X, doi.org/10.1080/15567030600817258
Chen W, Guo X. Efficient conversion of sewage sludge [32] Cornelissen T, Yperman J, Reggers G, Schreurs S,
into hydrochar by microwave-assisted hydrothermal Carleer R. Flash co-pyrolysis of biomass with polylactic
carbonization. Science of the Total Environment. 2022, 803, acid. Part 1: Influence on Bio-oil yield and heating value.
149874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149874 Fuel. 2008, 87, 1031–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
[20] Ghodake GS, Shinde SK, Kadam AA, Saratale RG, fuel.2007.07.019
Saratale GD, Kumar M, Palem RR, AL-Shwaiman HA, [33] Vuppaladadiyam AK, Vuppaladadiyam SS, Sahoo A,
Elgorban AM, Syed A, Kim DY. Review on biomass Murugavelh S, Anthony E, Bhaskar T, Zheng Y, Zhao M,
feedstocks, pyrolysis mechanism and physicochemical Duan H, Zhao Y, Antunes E, Sarmah AK, Leu S-Y. Bio-oil
properties of biochar: a state-of-the-art framework to and biochar from the pyrolytic conversion of biomass: A
speed up the vision of circular bioeconomy. Journal current and future perspective on the trade-off between
of Cleaner Production. 2021, 297, 126645. https://doi. economic, environmental, and technical indicators.
org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2021.126645 Science of the Total Environment. 2023, 857, 159155.
[21] Lee SY, Sankaran R, Chew KW, Tan CH, Krishnamoorthy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159155
R, Chu D-T. Show P-L. Waste to bioenergy: a review on [34] Arora S, Jung J, Liu M, Li X, Goel A, Chen J, Song S,
the recent conversion technologies. BMC Energy. 2019, 1, Anderson C, Chen D, Leong K, Lim SH, Fong SL, Ghosh
1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42500-019-0004-7 S, Lin A, Kua HW, Tan HTW, Dai Y, Wang C-H. Gasification
[22] Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of wood/ Biochar from Horticultural Waste: An Exemplar of the
biomass for bio-oil: a critical review. Energy Fuel. 2006, Circular Economy in Singapore. Science of the Total
20, 848–889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0502397 Environment. 2021, 781, 146573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
[23] Cha JS, Park SH, Jung S-C, Ryu C, Jeon J-K, Shin M-C, scitotenv.2021.146573
Park Y-K. Production and utilization of biochar: A review. [35] Katsaros G, Pandey DS, Horvat A, Almansa GA, Fryda LE,
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2016, 40, Leahy JJ, Tassou SA. Experimental investigation of poultry
1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002 litter gasification and co-gasification with beech wood in a
[24] Wang L, Ok YS, Tsang DCW, Alessi D, Rinklebe J, bubbling fluidised bed reactor—Effect of equivalence ratio
Wang H, Mašek O, Hou R, O’Connor D, Hou D. New on process performance and tar evolution. Fuel. 2020,
trends in biochar pyrolysis and modification strategies: 262, 116660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116660
Feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability concerns [36] Liu Z, Wang Z, Che, H, Cai T, Liu Z. Hydrochar and pyrochar
and implications for soil amendment. Soil Use and for sorption of pollutants in wastewater and exhaust gas:
Management. 2020, 36, 358–386. doi: 10.1111/sum.12592 A critical review. Environmental Pollution. 2021, 268,
[25] Liu WJ, Li WW, Jiang H, Yu HQ. Fates of Chemical 115910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115910
Elements in Biomass during its Pyrolysis. Chemical [37] Lachos-Perez D, Torres-Mayanga PC, Abaide ER,
Reviews. 2017, 117, 6367–6398. https://doi.org/10.1021/ Zabot GL, De Castilhos F. Hydrothermal carbonization
acs.chemrev.6b00647 and Liquefaction: differences, progress, challenges,
[26] Méndez A, Paz-Ferreiro J, Gil E, Gascó G. The effect of and opportunities. Bioresource Technology. 2022, 343,

68  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

126084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126084 processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis.


[38] Missaoui A, Bostyn S, Belandria V, Cagnon B, Sarh Biofuels. 2011, 2, 71–106. DOI: 10.4155/bfs.10.81
B, Gökalp I. Hydrothermal carbonization of dried olive [51] Liu Z, Quek A, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R.
pomace: energy potential and process performances. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2017, 128, hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 2013, 103, 943–949.
281-290. 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.09.022 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.07.069
[39] González-Arias J, Sánchez ME, Cara-Jiménez J, Baena- [52] Meng H, Nie C, Li W, Duan X, Lai B, Ao Z, Wang S, An
Moreno FM, Zhang Z. Hydrothermal carbonization of T. Insight into the effect of lignocellulosic biomass source
biomass and waste: a review. Environmental Chemistry on the performance of biochar as persulfate activator
Letters. 2022, 20, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/ for aqueous organic pollutants remediation: epicarp
s10311-021-01311-x and mesocarp of citrus peels as examples. Journal of
[40] Zhang Z, Zhu Z, Shen B, Liu L. Insights into biochar Hazardous Materials. 2020, 399, 123043. https://doi.
and hydrochar production and applications: a review. org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2020.123043
Energy. 2019, 171, 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. [53] Deng R, Luo H, Huang D, Zhang C. Biochar-
energy.2019.01.035. mediated Fenton-like reaction for the degradation of
[41] Cao Y, He M, Dutta S, Luo G, Zhang S, Tsang DCW. sulfamethazine: role of environmentally persistent free
Hydrothermal carbonization and liquefaction for radicals. Chemosphere. 2020, 255, 126975. https://doi.
sustainable production of hydrochar and aromatics. org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126975
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2021, 152, [54] Rajpoot L, Tagade A, Deshpande G, Verma K, Geed SR.,
111722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111722 Patle DS, Sawarkar AN. An overview of pyrolysis of de-
[42] Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, Li C, Zeng G. A review of the oiled cakes for the production of biochar, bio-oil, and pyro-
hydrothermal carbonization of biomass waste for gas: Current status, challenges, and future perspective.
hydrochar formation: Process conditions, fundamentals, Bioresource Technology Reports. 2022, 19, 101205.
and physicochemical properties. Renewable and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101205
Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018, 90, 223–247. https:// [55] Jiang T, Wang B, Gao B, Cheng N, Feng Q, Chen M,
doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.071 Wang S. Degradation of organic pollutants from water
[43] Parsa M, Nourani M, Baghdadi M, Hosseinzadeh M, by biochar-assisted advanced oxidation processes:
Pejman M. Biochars derived from marine macroalgae as Mechanisms and applications. Journal of Hazardous
a mesoporous by-product of hydrothermal liquefaction Materials. 2023, 442, 130075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
process: characterization and application in wastewater jhazmat.2022.130075
treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2019, [56] Feng D, Guo D, Zhang Y, Sun S, Zhao Y, Shang Q, Sun H,
32, 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100942 Wu J, Tan H. Functionalized construction of biochar with
[44] Ahmad S, Zhu X, Luo J, Shen M, Zhou S, Zhang S. hierarchical pore structures and surface O-/N-containing
Conversion of phosphorus and nitrogen in lincomycin groups for phenol adsorption. Chemical Engineering
residue during microwave-assisted hydrothermal Journal. 2021, 410, 127707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
liquefaction and its application for Pb2+ removal. Science cej.2020.127707
of The Total Environment. 2019, 687, 1381–1388. https:// [57] Zhang R, Zheng X, Zhang D, Niu X, Ma J, Lin Z, Fu M,
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.103 Zhou S. Insight into the roles of endogenous minerals
[45] Panchal H, Gohil GS, Rana BS Hydrothermal liquefaction in the activation of persulfate by graphitized biochar for
of biomass for bio-oil production: A review. Bioresource tetracycline removal. Science of the Total Environment.
Technology. 2017, 238, 716-729. doi: 10.1016/j. 2021, 768, 144281. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.
biortech.2017.04.081 scitotenv.2020.144281
[46] Zhang S, Zhu X, Zhou S, Shang H, Luo J, Tsang DC. [58] Yu F, Tian F, Zou H, Ye Z, Peng C, Huang J, Zheng Y, Zhang
Hydrothermal carbonization for hydrochar production and Y, Yang Y, Wei X, Gao B. ZnO/biochar nanocomposites
its application. Biochar from Biomass and Waste. 2019, via solvent-free ball milling for enhanced adsorption and
275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811729- photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Journal
3.00015-7 of Hazardous Materials. 2021, 415, 125511. https://doi.
[47] Liu H, Chen Y, Yang H, Gentili FG, Söderlind U, Wang X, org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125511
Chen H. Hydrothermal carbonization of natural microalgae [59] Mansoori S, Davarnejad R, Ozumchelouei EJ, Ismail AF.
containing a high ash content. Fuel. 2019, 249, 441–448. Activated biochar supported iron-copper oxide bimetallic
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.004 catalyst for degradation of ciprofloxacin via photo-assisted
[48] Kim D, Lee K, Park KY. Upgrading the characteristics of electro-Fenton process: a mild pH condition. Journal of
biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel Water Process Engineering. 2021, 39, 101888. https://doi.
production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101888
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2016, 42, [60] Reshad AS, Tiwari P, Goud VV. Thermal and co-
95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.037 pyrolysis of rubber seed cake with waste polystyrene
[49] Nizamuddin S, Baloch HA, Griffin GJ, Mubarak NM, Bhutto for bio-oil production. Journal of Analytical and Applied
AW, Abro R, Ali BS. An overview of the effect of process Pyrolysis. 2019, 139, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. jaap.2019.03.010
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017, 73, [61] Agrawalla A, Kumar S, Singh RK. Pyrolysis of groundnut
1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.122 de-oiled cake and characterization of the liquid product.
[50] Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann, C, Funke A, Berge ND, Bioresource Technology. 2011, 102, 10711–10716. https://
Neubauer Y, Emmerich KH. Hydrothermal carbonization of doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.113
biomass residuals: A comparative review of the chemistry, [62] Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spok K.

69
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood Hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk for fuel upgrading.
derived biochars. Waste Management. 2015, 36, 256-268. Materials Science and Engineering. 2018, 297, 012007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.029 https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/297/1/012007
[63] Chen L, Jiang X, Xie R, Zhang Y, Jin Y, Jiang W. A [75] Zhang X, Gao B., Zhao S, Wu P, Han L, Liu X. Optimization
novel porous biochar-supported Fe-Mn composite as of a “coal-like” pelletization technique based on the
a persulfate activator for the removal of acid red 88. sustainable biomass fuel of hydrothermal carbonization of
Separation and Purification Technology. 2020, 250, wheat straw. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020, 242,
117232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117232 118426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118426
[64] Zhang Y, Xu M, Liang S, Feng Z, Zhao J. Mechanism of [76] Ma Q, Han L, Huang G. Effect of water-washing of wheat
persulfate activation by biochar for the catalytic degradation straw and hydrothermal temperature on its hydrochar
of antibiotics: Synergistic effects of environmentally evolution and combustion properties. Bioresource
persistent free radicals and the defective structure of Technology. 2018, 269, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
biochar. Science of the Total Environment. 2021, 794, biortech.2018.08.082
148707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148707 [77] Leng S, Li W, Han C, Chen L, Chen J, Fan L, Lu Q,
[65] Chu JH, Kang JK, Park SJ, Lee CG. Application Li J, Leng L, Zhou W. Aqueous phase recirculation
of magnetic biochar derived from food waste in during hydrothermal carbonization of microalgae and
heterogeneous sono-Fenton-like process for removal of soybean straw: a comparison study. Bioresource
organic dyes from aqueous solution. Journal of Water Technology. 2020, 298, 122502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Process Engineering. 2020, 37, 101455. https://doi.org/ biortech.2019.122502
10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101455 [78] Lin Y, Ma X, Peng X, Yu Z. Hydrothermal carbonization of
[66] Azzaz AA, Khiari B, Jellali S, Ghimbeu CM, Jeguirim M. typical components of municipal solid waste for deriving
Hydrochars production, characterization and application hydrochars and their combustion behavior. Bioresource
for wastewater treatment: A review. Renewable and Technology. 2017, 243, 539-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020, 127, 109882. https:// biortech.2017.06.117
doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109882 [79] Saha, N., Saba, A., Reza, M.T., 2019. Effect of
[67] Ghanim BM, Shankar D, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ. hydrothermal carbonization temperature on pH,
Bioresource Technology Hydrothermal carbonisation dissociation constants, and acidic functional groups on
of poultry litter: effects of treatment temperature and hydrochar from cellulose and wood. Journal of Analytical
residence time on yields and chemical properties of and Applied Pyrolysis. 2019, 137, 138–145. https://doi.
hydrochars. Bioresource Technology. 2016, 216, 373–80. org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.11.018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.087 [80] Mendoza Martinez CL, Sermyagina E, Saari J, Silva
[68] Wu K, Gao Y, Zhu G, Zhu J, Yuan Q, Chen Y, Cai M, de Jesus M, Cardoso M, de Almeida GM, Vakkilainen
Feng L. Characterization of dairy manure hydrochar and E. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic
aqueous phase products generated by hydrothermal agroforest based biomass residues. Biomass and
carbonization at different temperatures. Journal of Bioenergy. 2021, 147, 106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2017, 127, 335-342. biombioe.2021.106004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.07.017 [81] He Q, Cheng C, Raheem A, Ding L, Lam SS, Yu G. Effect
[69] Lee J, Lee K, Sohn D, Kim YM, Park KY. Hydrothermal of hydrothermal carbonization on woody biomass: from
carbonization of lipid extracted algae for hydrochar structure to reactivity. Fuel. 2022, 330, 125586. https://doi.
production and feasibility of using hydrochar as a solid org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125586
fuel. Energy. 2018, 153, 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. [82] Lucian M, Volpe M, Gao L, Piro G, Goldfarb JL, Fiori L.
energy.2018.04.112 Impact of hydrothermal carbonization conditions on the
[70] Zhang Y, Jiang Q, Xie W, Wang Y, Kang J. Effects of formation of hydrochars and secondary chars from the
temperature, time and acidity of hydrothermal carbonization organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Fuel. 2018, 233,
on the hydrochar properties and nitrogen recovery from 257-268. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.060
corn stover. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2019, 122, 175-182. [83] Lin Y, Ma X, Peng X, Yu Z. A mechanism study on
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biombioe.2019.01.035 hydrothermal carbonization of waste textile. Energy Fuels.
[71] Nakason K, Panyapinyopol B, Kanokkantapong V, Viriya- 2016, 30, 7746–7754. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs. energy
empikul N, Kraithong W, Pavasant P. Hydrothermal fuels.6b01365
carbonization of unwanted biomass materials: effect of [84] Reza MT, Coronella C, Holtman KM, Franqui-Villanueva
process temperature and retention time on hydrochar and D, Poulson SR. Hydrothermal carbonization of autoclaved
liquid fraction. Journal of the Energy Institute. 2018, 91, municipal solid waste pulp and anaerobically treated pulp
786-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2017.05.002 digestate. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.
[72] Mohammed IS, Na R, Kushima K, Shimizu N. Investigating 2016, 4, 3649–3658. https:// doi.org/10.1021/
the effect of processing parameters on the products of acssuschemeng.6b00160
hydrothermal carbonization of corn stover. Sustainability. [85] Fei Y, Zhao D, Liu Y, Zhang W, Tang Y, Huang X, Wu
2020, 12, 5100-5120. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125100 Q, Wang Y, Xiao T, Liu C. Feasibility of sewage sludge
[73] Hossain N, Nizamuddin S, Griffin G, Selvakannan P, derived hydrochars for agricultural application: nutrients
Mubarak NM, Mahlia TMI. Synthesis and characterization (N, P, K) and potentially toxic elements (Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni,
of rice husk biochar via hydrothermal carbonization for Cd). Chemosphere. 2019, 236, 124841. https://doi.
wastewater treatment and biofuel production. Scientific org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124841
Reports. 2020, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598- [86] Ferrentino R, Ceccato R, Marchetti V, Andreottola G, Fiori
020-75936-3 L. Sewage sludge hydrochar: an option for removal of
[74] Suteerawattananonda N, Kongkaew N, Patumsawad S. methylene blue from wastewater. Applied Sciences. 2020,

70  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

10, 2445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103445 properties. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2014, 240,


[87] Marin-Batista JD, Mohedano AF, Rodríguez JJ, de la 574–578. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.08
Rubia MA. Energy and phosphorous recovery through [100] [100] Zheng H, Wang Z, Zhao J, Herbert S, Xing
hydrothermal carbonization of digested sewage sludge. B. (2013) Sorption of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole
Waste Management. 2020, 105, 566–574. https://doi. varies with biochars produced at different temperatures.
org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.004 Environmental Pollution. 2013, 181, 60–67. https ://doi.
[88] Wang W, Chen WH, Jang MF. Characterization of org/10.1016/j.envpo l.2013.05.056
hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonization of [101] Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan
organic sludge. Future Cities and Environment. 2020, 6, N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS. Biochar as a
1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.102 sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water:
[89] Ma W, Wang N, Du Y, Xu P, Sun B, Zhang L, Lin KYA. A review. Chemosphere. 2014, 99, 19–33. https://doi.
Human-hair-derived N, S-doped porous carbon: an org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071
enrichment and degradation system for wastewater [102] Singh V, Srivastava VC. Self-engineered iron oxide
remediation in the presence of peroxymonosulfate. ACS nanoparticle incorporated on mesoporous biochar
Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2019, 7, 2718– derived from textile mill sludge for the removal of an
2727. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05801 emerging pharmaceutical pollutant. Environmental
[90] Jian H, Yang F, Gao Y, Zhen K, Tang X, Zhang P, Wang Pollution. 2020, 259. 113822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Y, Wang C, Sun H. Efficient removal of pyrene by biochar envpol.2019.113822
supported iron oxide in heterogeneous Fenton-like [103] Zhou Y, Lu J, Zhou Y, Liu Y. Recent advances for dyes
reaction via radicals and high-valent iron-oxo species. removal using novel adsorbents: a review. Environmental
Separation and Purification Technology. 2021, 265, Pollution. 2019, 252, 352–365. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.
118518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118518 envpol.2019.05.072
[91] Guo W, Wang S, Wang Y, Lu S, Gao Y. Sorptive removal [104] Lonappan L, Rouissi T, Brar SK, Verma M, Surampalli
of phenanthrene from aqueous solutions using magnetic RY. An insight into the adsorption of diclofenac on
and non-magnetic rice husk-derived biochars. Royal different biochars: mechanisms, surface chemistry, and
Society Open Science. 2018, 5, 172382. DOI: 10.1098/ thermodynamics. Bioresource Technology. 2018, 249,
rsos.172382 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.039
[92] Ma Y, Qi Y, Lu T, Yang L, Wu L, Cui S, Ding Y, Zhang Z. [105] Du L, Xu W, Liu S, Li X, Huang D, Tan X, Liu
Highly efficient removal of imidacloprid using potassium Y. Activation of persulfate by graphitized biochar for
hydroxide activated magnetic microporous loofah sponge sulfamethoxazole removal: the roles of graphitic carbon
biochar. Science of The Total Environment. 2021, 765, structure and carbonyl group. Journal of Colloid and
144253. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144253 Interface Science. 2020, 577, 419–430. https://doi.
[93] Ma Y, Li M, Li P, Yang L, Wu L, Gao F, Qi X, Zhang Z. org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.096
Hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic sludge biochar [106] Vigneshwaran S, Sirajudheen P, Nikitha M,
for tetracycline and ciprofloxacin adsorptive removal. Ramkumar K, Meenakshi S. Facile synthesis of sulfur-
Bioresource Technology. 2021, 319, 124199. https://doi. doped chitosan/biochar derived from tapioca peel for
org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124199 the removal of organic dyes: isotherm, kinetics and
[94] Shin J, Bae S, Chon K. Fenton oxidation of synthetic food mechanisms. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2021, 326,
dyes by Fe-embedded coffee biochar catalysts prepared 115303, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115303
at different pyrolysis temperatures: a mechanism study. [107] Tan G, Wu Y, Liu Y, Xiao D. Removal of Pb(II) ions from
Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021, 421, 129943. https:// aqueous solution by manganese oxide coated rice straw
doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129943 biochar – a low-cost and highly effective sorbent. Journal
[95] Fagbohungbe MO, Herbert BM, Hurst L, Ibeto CN, Li of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018, 84,
H, Usmani SQ, Semple KT. The challenges of anaerobic 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jtice.2017.12.031
digestion and the role of biochar in optimizing anaerobic [108] El Kassimi A, Boutouil A, El Himri M, Laamari MR, El
digestion. Waste Management. 2017, 61, 236–249. https Haddad M. Selective and competitive removal of three
://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasma n.2016.11.028 basic dyes from single, binary and ternary systems
[96] Inyang M, Gao B, Zimmerman A, Zhang M, Chen H. in aqueous solutions: a combined experimental and
Synthesis, characterization, and dye sorption ability of theoretical study. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society. 2020,
carbon nanotube–biochar nanocomposites. Chemical 24, 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jscs.2020.05.005
Engineering Journal. 2014, 236, 39–46. https ://doi. [109] Wang B, Lian G, Lee X, Gao B, Li L, Liu T, Zhang
org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.074 X, Zheng Y. Phosphogypsum as a novel modifier for
[97] Rosales E, Meijide J, Pazos M, Sanroman MA. distillers grains biochar removal of phosphate from
Challenges and recent advances in biochar as low- water. Chemosphere. 2020, 238, 124684. https://doi.
cost biosorbent: From batch assays to continuous-flow org/10.1016/j. chemosphere.2019.124684
systems. Bioresource Technology. 2017, 246, 176–192 [110] Liu L, Deng G, Shi X. Adsorption characteristics and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.084 mechanism of p-nitrophenol by pine sawdust biochar
[98] Keiluveit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M. Dynamic samples produced at different pyrolysis temperatures.
molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon Scientific Reports. 2020, 10, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/
(biochar). Environmental Science & Technology. 2010, 44, s41598-020- 62059-y
1247–1253. https ://doi.org/10.1021/es903 1419 [111] Lu L, Lin Y, Chai Q, He S, Yang C. Removal of
[99] Sun Y, Gao B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Chen acenaphthene by biochar and raw biomass with coexisting
H, Yang L. Effects of feedstock type, production method, heavy metal and phenanthrene. Colloids and Surfaces A:
and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2018, 558,

71
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. colsurfa.2018.08.057 application for 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethynylestradiol


[112] Velusamy K, Periyasamy S, Kumar PS, Jayaraj T, removal. RSC Advances. 2018, 8, 4273–4283. https://doi.
Krishnasamy R, Sindhu J, Sneka D, Subhashini B, Vo org/10.1039/c7ra12038a
DVN. Analysis of the removal of emerging contaminants [124] Loffredo, 2022 Recent advances in innovative
from aqueous solution using biochar derived from soap materials from biowaste recycling for the removal of
nut seeds. Environmental Pollution. 2021, 287, 117632. environmental estrogens from water and soil. Materials.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2021.117632 2022, 15, 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051894
[113] Cheng D, Ngo HH, Guo W, Chang SW, Nguyen DD, [125] Grisales-Cifuentes CM, Galvis EAS, Porras J, Flòrez
Zhang X, Varjani S, Liu Y. Feasibility study on a new E, Torres-Palma RA, Acelas N. Kinetics, isotherms, the
pomelo peel derived biochar for tetracycline antibiotics effect of structure, and computational analysis during the
removal in swine wastewater. Science of The Total removal of three representative pharmaceuticals from
Environment. 2020, 720, 137662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. water by adsorption using a biochar obtained from oil
scitotenv.2020.137662 palm fiber. Bioresource Technology. 2021, 326, 124753.
[114] Huang H, Niu Z, Shi R, Tang J, Lv L, Wang J, Fan Y. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124753
Thermal oxidation activation of hydrochar for tetracycline [126] Liu Y, Li F, Deng J, Wu Z, Lei T, Tan M, Wu Z, Qin X, Li
adsorption: the role of oxygen concentration and H. Mechanism of sulfamic acid modified biochar for highly
temperature. Bioresource Technology. 2020, 306, 123096. efficient removal of tetracycline. Journal of Analytical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123096 and Applied Pyrolysis. 2021, 158, 105247. https://doi.
[115] Zheng Z, Zhao B, Guo Y, Guo Y, Pak T, Li G. org/10.1016/j. jaap.2021.105247
Preparation of mesoporous batatas biochar via the [127] Li J, Liu Y, Ren X, Dong W, Chen H, Cai T, Zeng W,
soft-template method for high-efficiency removal of Li W, Tang L. Soybean residue-based biochar prepared
tetracycline. Science of the Total Environment. 2021, 787, by ball milling assisted alkali activation to activate
47397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147397 peroxydisulfate for the degradation of tetracycline. Journal
[116] Prasannamedha G, Kumar PS, Mehala R, Sharumitha of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021, 599, 631–641.
TJ, Surendhar D. Enhanced adsorptive removal of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.04.074
sulfamethoxazole from water using biochar derived [128] Chen T, Luo L, Deng S, Shi G, Zhang S, Zhang Y,
from hydrothermal carbonization of sugarcane bagasse. Deng O, Wang L, Zhang J, Wei L. Sorption of tetracycline
Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021, 407, 124825. on H3PO4 modified biochar derived from rice straw and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124825 swine manure. Bioresource Technology. 2018, 267, 431–
[117] Choi Y, Choi T, Gurav R, Bhatia SK, Park Y, Kim 437. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.074
HJ, Kan E, Yang Y. Adsorption behavior of tetracycline [129] Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W, Johir MAH,
onto Spirulina sp. (microalgae)-derived biochars Sornalingam K. Single and competitive sorption properties
produced at different temperatures. Science of the Total and mechanism of functionalized biochar for removing
Environment. 2020, 710, 136282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sulfonamide antibiotics from water. Chemical Engineering
scitotenv.2019.136282 Journal. 2017, 311, 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
[118] Shirani Z, Song H, Bhatnagar A. Efficient removal of cej.2016.11.106
diclofenac and cephalexin from aqueous solution using [130] Heo J, Yoon Y, Lee G, Kim Y, Han J, Park CM.
Anthriscus sylvestris-derived activated biochar. Science Enhanced adsorption of bisphenol A and sulfamethoxazole
of The Total Environment. 2020, 745, 140789. https://doi. by a novel magnetic CuZnFe2O4–biochar composite.
org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.140789 Bioresource Technology. 2019, 281, 179–187. https://doi.
[119] Zheng W, Guo M, Chow T, Bennett DN, Rajagopalan N. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.091
Sorption properties of green waste biochar for two triazine [131] Sun C, Chen T, Huang Q, Duan X, Zhan M, Ji L, Li X,
pesticides. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2010, 181, Yan J. Selective production of singlet oxygen from zinc-
121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.103 etching hierarchically porous biochar for sulfamethoxazole
[120] Tasca AL, Puccini M, Stefanelli E, Gori R, Galletti degradation. Environmental Pollution. 2021, 290, 117991.
AMR, Vitolo S. Investigating the activation of hydrochar https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117991
from sewage sludge for the removal of terbuthylazine [132] Meng H, Nie C, Li W, Duan X, Lai B, Ao Z, Wang
from aqueous solutions. Journal of Material Cycles and S, An T. Removal of sulfadiazine from aqueous solution
Waste Management. 2020, 22, 1539–1551. https://doi. by in-situ activated biochar derived from the cotton shell.
org/10.1007/s10163-020-01045-y Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2020, 191, 110104.
[121] Liu Y, Sun Y, Wan Z, Jing F, Li Z, Chen J, Tsang DCW. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envres.2020.110104
Tailored design of food waste hydrochar for efficient [133] Suo F, You X, Ma Y, Li Y. Rapid removal of triazine
adsorption and catalytic degradation of refractory organic pesticides by P doped biochar and the adsorption
contaminant. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021, 310, mechanism. Chemosphere. 2019, 235, 918–925. https://
127482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127482 doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.158
[122] de Lima HHC, Llop MEG, dos Santos Maniezzo R, [134] Xiong S, Deng Y, Tang R, Zhang C, Zheng J, Zhang
Moisés MP, Janeiro V, Arroyo PA, Guilherme MR, Rinaldi Y, Su L, Yang L, Liao C, Gong D. Factors study for the
AW. Enhanced removal of bisphenol a using pine-fruit removal of epoxiconazole in water by common biochars.
shell-derived hydrochars: adsorption mechanisms and Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2020, 161, 107690.
reusability. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021, 416, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bej.2020.107690
126167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126167 [135] Yoon JY, Kim JE, Song HJ, Oh KB, Jo JW, Yang
[123] Tian SR, Liu YG, Liu SB, Zeng GM, Jiang LH, Tan XF, YH, Lee SH, Kang G, Kim HJ, Choi YK. Assessment of
Huang XX, Yin ZH, Liu N, Li J. Hydrothermal synthesis adsorptive behaviors and properties of grape pomace-
of montmorillonite/hydrochar nanocomposites and derived biochar as adsorbent for removal of cymoxanil

72  
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

pesticide. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2021, chemosphere.2022.137074


21, 101242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eti.2020.101242 [147] Delgado-Moreno L, Bazhari S, Gasco G, Méndez A,
[136] Zhang Y, Cao B, Zhao L, Sun L, Gao Y, Li J, Yang Azzouzi ME, Romero E. New insights into the efficient
F. Biochar supported reduced graphene oxide composite removal of emerging contaminants by biochars and
for adsorption and coadsorption of atrazine and lead ions. hydrochars derived from olive oil wastes. Science of
Applied Surface Science. 2018, 427, 147–155. https ://doi. the Total Environment. 2021, 752, 141838. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apsus c.2017.07.237 org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141838
[137] Iheanacho OC, Nwabanne JT, Obi CC, Onu CE. [148] Sayğılı GA, Sayğılı H. Fabrication of a magnetic
Packed bed column adsorption of phenol onto corn cob hydrochar composite via an in situ one-pot
activated carbon: linear and nonlinear kinetics modelling. hydrocarbonization strategy for efficient herbicide removal.
South African Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2021, 36, Diamond & Related Materials. 2022, 128, 109302. https://
80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2021.02.003 doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109302
[138] Kalderis D, Kayan B, Akay S, Kulaksız E, Gözmen B. [149] Yan S, Qu J, Bi F, Wei S, Wang S, Jiang Z, Wang
Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol on paper sludge/wheat L, Yu H, Zhang Y. One-pot synthesis of porous N-doped
husk biochar: process optimization and comparison with hydrochar for atrazine removal from aqueous phase:
biochars prepared from woodchips, sewage sludge and Co-activation and adsorption mechanisms. Bioresource
hog fuel/demolition waste. Journal of Environmental Technology. 2022, 364, 128056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Chemical Engineering. 2017, 5, 2222–2231. https ://doi. biortech.2022.128056
org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.04.039 [150] Marx S, Venter RJ, Louw A, Dewah CT. Upgrading
[139] Sun C, Chen T, Huang Q, Zhan M, Li X, Yan J. of the aqueous product stream from hydrothermal
Activation of persulfate by CO2- activated biochar for liquefaction: Simultaneous removal of minerals and
improved phenolic pollutant degradation: performance phenolic components using waste-derived hydrochar.
and mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020, Biomass and Bioenergy. 2021, 151, 106170. https://doi.
380, 122519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cej.2019.122519 org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106170
[140] Nazal MK, Rao D, Abuzaid N. The nature and kinetics [151] Lu J, Zhang C, Wu J, Luo Y. Adsorptive removal of
of 2,4-dimethylphenol adsorption in aqueous solution on bisphenol A using N-doped biochar made of Ulva prolifera.
biochar derived from Sargassum boveanum macroalgae. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2017, 228, 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/
Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology– s11270-017-3516-0
Aqua. 2020, 69, 438–452. https://doi. org/10.2166/
aqua.2020.142
[141] Liu S, Li M, Liu Y, Liu N, Tan X, Jiang L, Wen J, Hu X,
Yin Z. Removal of 17 β -estradiol from aqueous solution
by graphene oxide supported activated magnetic biochar:
adsorption behavior and mechanism. Journal of the
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2019, 102, 330–
339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.05.002
[142] de Araújo TP, Quesada HB, dos Santos DF, da Silva
Fonseca BC, Barbieri JZ, Bergamasco R, de Barros
MASD. Acetaminophen removal by calcium alginate/
activated hydrochar composite beads: Batch and
fixed-bed studies. International Journal of Biological
Macromolecules. 2022, 203, 553–562. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.177
[143] de Araújo TP, Quesada HB, Bergamasco R, Vareschini
DT, de Barros MASD. Activated hydrochar produced from
brewer's spent grain and its application in the removal
of acetaminophen. Bioresource Technology. 2020, 310,
123399. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123399
[144] Hayoun B, Escudero-Curiel S, Bourouina M,
Bourouina-Bacha S, Sanromán A, Pazos M. Preparation
and characterization of high-performance hydrochar for
efficient adsorption of drugs mixture. Journal of Molecular
Liquids. 2022, 353, 1187972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
molliq.2022.118797
[145] Wei J, Liu Y, Li J, Zhu Y, Yu H, Peng Y. Adsorption and
co-adsorption of tetracycline and doxycycline by one-step
synthesized iron loaded sludge biochar. Chemosphere.
2019, 236, 124254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
chemosphere.2019.06.224
[146] Yoo S-H, Lee S-C, Jang H-Y, Kim S-B. Characterization
of ibuprofen removal by calcined spherical hydrochar
through adsorption experiments, molecular modeling,
and artificial neural network predictions. Chemosphere.
2023, 311, 137074 https://d oi.org/10.1016/j.

73
Advanced technologies 12(1) (2023) 57-74

Izvod

BIOČAĐ I HIDROČAĐ KAO ADSORBENTI ZA UKLANJANJE EMERGENTNIH


ZAGAĐUJUĆIH MATERIJA IZ OTPADNIH VODA

Aleksandra Adamović1, Mirjana Petronijević2, Sanja Panić2, Dragan Cvetković1,


Igor Antić2, Zoran Petrović3, Nataša Đurišić-Mladenović2 (MINI PREGLEDNI RAD)
UDK 631.878:628.316.12
1Univerzitet u Nišu, Tehnološki fakultet, Leskovac, Srbija DOI: 10.5937/savteh2301057A
2Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Tehnološki fakultet Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Srbija
3Univerzitet u Istočnom Sarajevu, Tehnološki fakultet, Zvornik, Republika Srpska, Bosna i Hercegovina

Poslednjih decenija ugljenični materijali, kao što su biočađ (BC) i hidročađ (HC),
se intenzivno koriste kao isplativi i ekološki prihvatljivi adsorbenti u tretmanu vode.
Specifične fizičko-hemijske karakteristike uglja omogućavaju efikasno uklanjanje
širokog spektra zagađujućih materija iz vode, uključujući emergentne kontaminante Ključne reči: biočađ, hidročađ, adsorp­
(npr. farmaceutski aktivna jedinjenja, agrohemikalije i jedinjenja koja ometaju rad cija, emergentni polutanti, tretman vode
endokrinog sistema). BC i HC se mogu sintetisati iz različitih biljnih materijala, čak
i iz otpadne biomase, što ih čini jeftinim materijalima. U stvari, primena otpadne
biomase za proizvodnju ugljeva može se označiti kao obećavajući put ka postizanju
ciljeva održivog razvoja u vezi sa upravljanjem čvrstim otpadom. Izbor sirovine i op­
timizacija reakcionih uslova procesa karbonizacije (piroliza, hidrotermalna karboni­
zacija, itd.) utiču na performanse materijala na bazi ugljenika koji dovode do proizvo­
da sa željenim karakteristikama pogodnim za uklanjanje određene grupe jedinjenja.
Cilj ovog preglednog rada je da pruži pregled trenutnog statusa istraživanja u vezi
sa primenom BC i HC kao adsorbenata u uklanjanju emergentnih polutanata (CEC)
iz otpadnih voda. Biće obrađena i fizičko-hemijska svojstva supstrata, vrste sinteze,
tehnike karakterizacije, kao i mehanizam i uticaj parametara procesa u uklanjanju
CEC-ova iz otpadnih voda.

74  

You might also like