Memorandum

TO: Mr. Michael W. Ryan, Ryan and Ryan Law

Mr. Keith Newton, Commonwealth in the Village Condo Association
Mr. John Hattle, Commonwealth in the Village Condo Association

FROM: Jeffery Pleiter

DATE: 2/6/2023

SUBJECT: Executive Summary of Results from the Review of Proposed Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority (ISTHA) Project Work Within and Adjacent to
Commonwealth in the Village (CITV)

This memorandum provides Patrick Engineering Inc.’s (Patrick) executive summary of the findings from
the review of the proposed Illinois State Toll Highway Project for the Central Tri-State (I-294) within and
adjacent to the CITV. Some of the findings in this memorandum were previously issued in the Patrick
memorandums listed below while other findings expressed herein were developed after the below
memorandums were completed.
• Review of Proposed Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) Project Work Within and
Adjacent to Commonwealth in the Village, dated April 2, 2021
• Review of Proposed Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) Project Work Within and
Adjacent to Commonwealth in the Village Bulletin 75 Review Detention Basin, dated October 19,
2021
• Review of Proposed Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) Project Work Within and
Adjacent to Commonwealth in the Village Bulletin 75 Review 49th Street Ditch, dated November
3, 2021
• Review of Proposed Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (ISTHA) Project Work Within and
Adjacent to Commonwealth in the Village Ditches East of the Tollway Proposed Sound Walls,
dated November 3, 2021

This summary memorandum reports Patrick’s findings after review of ISTHA documents, emailed
information, and meetings. This information was reviewed and discussed with ISTHA; and the findings,
recommendations, conclusions, and limitations regarding the effects of proposed ISTHA I-294 Tollway
widening to Commonwealth in the Village (CITV) property and concerns are summarized below.

Patrick was tasked specifically to review:

• ISTHA proposed streambank stabilization improvement to the 49th Street ditch.
• Construction of an ISTHA detention basin adjacent to an existing detention basin at 51st Street.
ISTHA had proposed two alternatives:
o Alternate 1 leaves the existing CITV concrete block retaining wall in place
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 2 of 37

o Alternate 2 includes removal of CITV existing concrete block retaining wall

• ISTHA proposed storm sewers and stormwater flows that may affect CITV.
• Small swales east of the Tollway proposed soundwalls.

Patrick and subconsultant Living Waters Consultants (LWC) review resulted in the following findings:

49th STREET DITCH IMPRVOMENTS

Flow within the 49th Street Ditch.

CITV concern was that the proposed ISTHA project would increase flow in the ditch. Based on review
of design information and calculations supplied by ISTHA, the flow in the 49th Street Ditch will be
reduced. Based on Patrick’s review, the flows from I-294 and its adjacent area to the 49th Street Ditch
will be reduced by approximately 22% for the 100-year storm event:
• Review of the ISTHA Pre-Final Drainage Report, the drainage area from the ISTHA Project to the
49th Street Ditch decreases from 173.66 acres under the existing conditions to 134.60 acres under
the proposed conditions. ISTHA’s proposed Detention Pond adjacent to the Commonwealth
Pond) will contain the critical duration (1-hr) 100-year storm and decrease the peak discharge to
the 49th Street Ditch. The onsite area (within ISTHA right-of-way) peak discharge to 49th Street
Ditch under existing conditions is 32.40 cfs for 2-year storm event and 133.40 cfs for 100-year
storm event, and under proposed conditions is reduced to 29.00 cfs for 2-year storm event and
103.80 cfs for 100-year storm event.
• ISTHA provided for review a HEC-RAS Model which was used for the ISTHA Concept Drainage
Report. The improvement of the 49th Street Ditch, the 8′ by 8′ box culvert underneath the I-294
Tollway discharging to 49th Street Ditch and the culvert underneath Creek Drive are designed
based on the HEC-RAS model result. The HEC-RAS model used channel flow of 283.9 cfs for 100-
year storm event, while the peak release rates for on-site plus off-site area under existing
conditions is 167.50 cfs and the peak release rate under proposed conditions is 122.40 cfs
according to the 95% Pre-Final Drainage Report. Therefore, the improvement based on the HEC-
RAS model is a conservative result.
• Patrick obtained and ran the Concept Drainage Report HEC-HMS and HEC-RAS models for more
frequent storm events (i.e. 0.5-year, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year frequency). The model results
indicate that the inverted siphon structure within the 49th Street Ditch is overtopped for all storm
events, indicating that that the structure does not provide any significant flow control or
detention. The impact of the siphon is the same under both existing and proposed conditions.
Streambank erosion is notably more severe downstream of the structure.
• Patrick performed additional stormwater review and analysis using ISTHA provided models and
information to determine the effect of the higher precipitation in Illinois Water Survey Bulletin
75. Patrick used the “original” model and ran conditions under Bulletin 75 precipitation data to
model stormwater flows into 49th Street Ditch and compare to the model results that used the
older Bulletin 70. Whether Bulletin 70 or 75 is used to compare existing and proposed conditions,
either case demonstrates that the Tollway project results in a 22% reduction to the tributary
drainage area as well as proposed flows to the 49th Street Ditch from the I-294 roadway and its
adjacent area. This is due to the proposed construction of new detention by ISTHA, and by the
ISTHA’s diversion of runoff away from the 49th Street Ditch to downstream areas of Flagg Creek
south of CITV. The LWC 49th Street Ditch revised stabilization plan is expected to provide long-
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 3 of 37

term stabilization improvements to the channel. The proposed improvements are expected to
reduce potential erosion that could otherwise occur due to rainfall.

Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) Permitting.

The MWRD has been involved from the beginning of the project. A Watershed Management
Ordinance permit is required and has been submitted by ISTHA. MWRD accepts ISTHA practices for
capturing runoff for proposed roadway improvements. Reference attached TranSystems letter dated
December 16, 2022 for additional detail regarding the MWRD permitting and response regarding
efforts by ISTHA to manage stormwater.

49th Street Ditch Bank Stabilization.

Bank Stabilization Measures: Most of the existing 49th Street ditch channel exhibits relatively low
erosion between Commonwealth Avenue and the inverted siphon structure. More significant bank
and channel scour erosion is present between the inverted siphon and Flagg Creek, which requires
additional stabilization techniques. ISTHA proposed a simple concept for stabilization of the 49th
Street Ditch. Review of the proposed concept by Patrick and LWC deemed the concept was
incomplete and insufficient for the task. LWC had previously prepared plans for streambank
stabilization of the 49th Street Ditch. In conjunction with CITV attorney Mike Ryan, it was negotiated
that ISTHA would pay for the implementation of the LWC streambank stabilization plan along the 49th
Street Ditch. The stabilization work within the 49th Street Ditch includes rock toe protection, a rock
riffle, bank re-grading, and revegetation. The stabilization will include the removal of non-native and
invasive tree and shrub species, and planting of native grasses and shrubs to revegetate the channel
banks. While the Tollway Project reduces the proposed flows to the 49th Street Ditch due to
construction of new detention by ISTHA, and by the ISTHA diversion of runoff away from the 49th
Street Ditch to downstream areas of Flagg Creek south of CITV, LWC’s 49th Street Ditch revised
stabilization plan is expected to provide long-term stabilization improvements to the channel.

49th Street Ditch Maintenance: Following Installation of new bank stabilization measures. Regular
maintenance will be required for plantings and debris removal:
1) Native plant maintenance. In the past, little to no plant maintenance appears to have
occurred along the 49th Street Ditch. This has contributed to some streambank
degradation. In the proposed settlement with ISTHA, CITV would receive from ISTHA
$402,360.00 for stabilization of the 49th Street Ditch, which includes funds to cover the
first five (5) years of native plant maintenance required by permit. The estimated annual
native plant maintenance cost for the 49th Street Ditch is approximately $5,000 per year.
The cost to be paid by ISTHA includes $25,000 for 5 years of native plant maintenance.
Native plant maintenance is highly recommended to continue beyond that time annually
to protect and maintain the stabilized streambank areas.
2) In exchange for the $402,360.00 payment from ISTHA, CITV would be responsible for
“Routine Maintenance”, and ISTHA would be responsible for “Emergency Maintenance”
as defined in the agreement. “Routine Maintenance” refers to day-to-day plantings,
vegetation and landscape care, mowing of any grass, invasive tree and weed removal,
and removal of debris and litter from the 49th Street Ditch. “Emergency Maintenance”
refers to any maintenance activity which must be performed immediately in order to
avoid or repair a condition in the 49th Street Ditch which causes or threatens imminent
danger or destruction to I-294. The proposed ISTHA settlement cost of $402,360.00
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 4 of 37

would include funds to provide streambank stabilization through revegetation as well as

rock lining to stabilize the outfall of the siphon and to protect the channel adjacent to
and downstream of the siphon structure. A riffle structure would be installed
downstream of the siphon structure to enhance downstream channel stabilization. The
proposed ISTHA settlement of $402,360.00 would include funds to provide rock lining to
stabilize the outfall of the existing siphon structure.

ISTHA DETENTION BASIN

Regulatory Requirements.
Development that occurred prior to the enforcement date of any County stormwater ordinance,
including MWRD, is not subject to the ordinance. Only development or re-development that occurs
after the date of the MWRD ordinance is subject to the requirements of the stormwater ordinance.
The MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO) that regulates development became
effective May 1, 2014. Development that occurred prior to the date of the ordinance is
“grandfathered” in and is not subject to the new requirements of the current ordinance. This is in
part why there are few to no detention basins in older parts of Cook County. Most of the development
in the 49th Street Tributary sub-watershed occurred well before the ordinance became effective. This
is the case for much of Cook County. An exception is that redevelopment that causes new ground
disturbance exceeding a minimum area now becomes subject to the ordinance, but for most of the
460-acre watershed that drains to CITV, the development occurred prior to County stormwater
ordinances requiring detention basins. The Pre-Final Drainage Report, pg. 14, describes that the
maximum release rate is 0.15 cfs/acre for the 100-year flood and that it “must meet local
requirements if more restrictive.” The 100-year maximum allowable release rate is calculated by
multiplying the total added impervious area by 0.15 then adding that to the existing (non-impacted)
flowrate to determine the existing allowable release rate.

As noted above, ISTHA’s proposed Detention Pond adjacent to the Commonwealth Pond) will contain
the critical duration (1-hr) 100-year storm and decrease the peak discharge to the 49th Street Ditch.
After review of Bulletin 75 data, the top of berm elevation of the proposed ISTHA Detention basin is
sufficient.

EXISTING RETAINING WALL AT PROPOSED ISTHA BASIN

• Since the existing block wall appears to be in good condition, except some outward displacement,
and more significant outwards displacement at the southern end of the wall where it curves
around a tree and CITV detention storage appears to not be impacted under either of ISTHA’s
alternatives to remove the wall and replace with a berm or leave the wall in place, the primary
considerations are: (1) aesthetic value of the wall, (2) long-term operation and maintenance of
the wall and/or soil berm between the two basins. Neglecting aesthetics, Patrick and LWC
recommended CITV accept Alternative 2 with the wall to be removed and a soil berm to be
constructed as part of ISTHA improvements to reduce long-term liability and cost concerns to CITV
from wall failure or repairs.
• The ISTHA settlement will include ISTHA installation of landscaping on CITV property in the area
of the proposed ISTHA basin. CITV will be responsible for future maintenance of this landscaping.
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 5 of 37

Patrick and LWC provided comment and recommendations on the additional plantings proposed
by ISTHA in the area of the proposed ISTHA basin and CITV basin. Landscaping will consist of
removing several trees near I-294 and installing several trees in the vicinity of the proposed basin.
Some proposed landscaping appears to be on CITV property, and within the CITV’s detention
basin, and would require CITV agreement and approval. Landscaping placed within the CITV
detention basin should be vetted prior to approval to confirm it would not adversely impact basin
capacity or function. Patrick reviewed Village Ordinance Section 10-4-9-E-7 to evaluate the best
practices regarding the existing and proposed plantings within the Commonwealth basin.
According to the Ordinance, “Detention/retention basins and ponds shall be landscaped. Such
landscaping should include shade and ornamental trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or
other planting materials.” According to Ordinance 10-11-11-C, there is no specific opposition
against plantings within the wet/dry basins.
• As part of the settlement ISTHA is proposing to construct an 8-foot tall wood screening fence
along the east, north and south sides of the ISTHA detention basin. The fence would be on CITV
property, installed by ISTHA at its cost and maintained by CITV.

STORM SEWERS

• Storm sewers in the 95% Pre-Final plans are proposed from Sta. 1356+00 to 1364+50, and Sta.
1375+50 to 1386+00. ISHTA claimed that the storm sewers are capable to handle the 100-year
storm event and provided exhibits showing that the 100-year High Water Level is lower than the
rim elevations from Sta. 1375+50 to 1386+00, except Manhole S562, which is used to collect
overflow from Commonwealth Pond. A backflow restrictor is proposed to be placed on the
downstream end of pipe P559 from Commonwealth Pond to prevent backwater from 49th Street
Ditch from entering the detention basin. In storm events greater than the design storm that
causes overflowing of the storm sewers, where NB I-294 drains towards to the east
(approximate Sta. 1360+00 to 1363+00), the excess flows drain into existing detention ponds
between the Tollway and Commonwealth Avenue. Where NB I-294 drains towards the west
(north of Sta. 1363+00), the excess flows will drain towards the median and therefore not affect
the CITV local residential area.
• In summary, the stormwater sewers adjacent to Commonwealth Avenue are sized for the 100-
year storm event. Storm sewers under I-294 are sized for the 50-year storm and the overflow in
excess of the 50-year storm from the stormwater sewer under I-294 will not affect the CITV local
residential area because overflows will either drain to the I-294 median or to detention ponds.

SWALES/UNDERDRAINS

The 95% Pre-Final Report has a general statement that “roadside ditches and channels are designed
to convey runoff from the roadway, right-of-way, and storm sewers”. In most areas the Tollway
lanes are sloped towards the center of the roadway and many of the reviewed ditches do not carry
I-294 runoff according to the Pre-final Plan. The exceptions are between Sta. 1360+00 and 1365+00
where the roadway drains east to existing drainage ponds, and ditches between Sta. 1370+00 to
1375+50 and between Sta. 1379+00 to 1380+50, which will receive drainage overflowing from
Tollway storm sewers in storm events larger than the design storm which drain north and south to
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 6 of 37

the proposed Commonwealth Pond respectively. The storm sewers are not overtopped in 100-year
storm event, as stated in the previous section.

CITV communicated concerns that the swale between the sound wall and condos south of the
proposed detention pond as designed with shallow slopes may result in standing water. ISTHA said
that they are willing to revise the design to add an underdrain per CITV request in the meeting on
February 18, 2022. This was reconfirmed in the meeting on October 31, 2022. ISTHA provided plans
and cross sections showing the additional underdrain on January 12, 2023. Noted since the
underdrain is an addition to the ditch, and the invert elevation of the underdrain is lower than the
100-year High Water Level of Commonwealth Pond, it is possible water will stay for a short time in
the underdrain after large storm events until the pond drains down. Nevertheless, the underdrain
and swale modifications are expected to essentially eliminate visible standing water in the subject
swale system.

SUMMARY

• 49th Street Ditch will receive less runoff volume from the Tollway under proposed conditions,
approximately 22% less due to the diversion of stormwater to areas of Flagg Creek south of CITV.
• The ISTHA detention basin will store the 100-year critical duration storm
• The ISTHA detention basin will decrease the peak discharge to the 49th Street Ditch by 10% in the
2-year flood event and by 22% in the 100-year flood event.
• ISTHA proposed settlement with the CITV provides funding of $402,360 for construction
implementation as well as 5 years of maintenance of the LWC 49th Street Tributary Streambank
Stabilization Plan. Routine Maintenance of the vegetation within the 49th Street Ditch and clearing
of debris on the inverted siphon would be the responsibility of CITV under the proposed ISTHA
settlement.
• CITV will be responsible for routine maintenance, and ISTHA will be responsible for emergency
maintenance of the 49th Street Ditch.
• Tollway storm sewers are designed for the 100-year storm event and resulting flows are not
expected to impact homes in the CITV.
• ISTHA will add an underdrain below the swale between the proposed sound wall and CITV
buildings south of the proposed detention basin to aid in draining water from the swales to
essentially eliminate visible standing water and wet grass areas (see Attachment 3). Visible
standing water in the area of these swales is not expected to occur.

LIMITATIONS

• Standard engineering practice for subdivision design is that the storm sewer system contains at
least the 10-year storm event flows. Overflows are expected to occur in emergency overland /
overflow drainage routes. However, the proposed Tollway I-294 drainage design storm water
system will contain flows up to the 50-year storm event based on Bulletin 70 rainfall levels.
• ISTHA drainage design is based on Bulletin 70 precipitation data as required at the time of
permitting. The storm sewers next to the Commonwealth Avenue downstream of the detention
pond may be undersized to handle Bulletin 75 rainfall amounts. However, based on calculations
by Patrick, the proposed ISTHA detention basin is adequately sized to contain the 100-year
Commonwealth in the Village Condominium Association
ISTHA Project 2-6-2023
Western Springs, IL Page 7 of 37

storm based on Bulletin 75 data with only a 0.7 foot increase in high water level compared to
the results from Bulletin 70 rainfall. With this increase the high water level is still below the
pond overflow elevation with freeboard of greater than two feet.
• Per Commonwealth Avenue Venture Plans (1992) and Commonwealth Avenue Venture Phase II
Plans (1997), portions of Commonwealth Development Phase I drain to the 49th Street Ditch (area
between 49th Street Ditch, Commonwealth Avenue and Flagg Creek). The inflow from the
Commonwealth development is not included in the ISTHA’s 49th Street Ditch model; therefore,
actual flow rates should be slightly greater than stated in Pre-Final Drainage Report. The
Commonwealth development area draining to Flagg Creek is approximately 1% of the drainage
area to Flagg Creek west of I-294 Tollway (5 acres vs. 460 acres). The runoff from the
Commonwealth property is controlled by existing detention ponds within the development.
Therefore, the additional inflow from the 5-acre Commonwealth development area to Flagg Creek
does not significantly impact flood flow results.

P:\Lisle\Commonwealth in the Village\22053.047 - Tollway Project Review\12_Design\12.5_Reports\Report for Homeowners\PE

summary_memo_20230206.docx
 Attachment 1
Final Drainage Plans and Commonwealth
Pond Details
 64
5

645

64
5
64
64 5
7
64
5

6
4
7
6
4
7
OAS

7
646

IS

64
64
647 5

6
645
DRAINAGE LEGEND

64
647

645
7
64

64
5

64
5
6
46

645
64
64

64
6

5
PROPOSED STRUCTURE/
646

T
5
64
6

H S
S100

64
6
64
7

HEADWALL NUMBER

T
645
646

H S
55T
64
5

PROPOSED PIPE NUMBER

64

P100

47T
64
5
64 6
7 64

645
646

645
64
6
6

64
6
4 64
5
5

647
W
SEE UNDERGROUND DETENTION FOOTPRINT AND O
R

645

4
64
64

PR DRAINAGE NOTES
6
dgn

DRAINAGE INFORMATION ON SHEET DDET-3

AECOM _DS16_NA\Documents\60545817-Central Tri-State DCM \0400 W ork Packages\I-17-4298-SG3\31-C06\01 - DGN\12 - SHT\05-Drain\4298-C06-sht-drain04-TSC.

646

645
1.SEE TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FOR TEMPORARY DRAINAGE WORK

645

645
5 644
64

AD

64
DURING CONSTRUCTION.

5
646

RO

644
645

5
64
5
64

64
NG

6
64

645

44
5

PR ROW
645

5
64
RD
645

645

646
646
64
3

HA
645

64
64

7
5
64
6
647 5
64

645
64
7 6

645
64
47 64
6 5
64
5

644
646

4
5

64
64

646

5
4

4
64 64 5
64

6
6 645

64

645
646
646

5
5

645

64
64

645
646

64
645

5
64
6

5
64
64

645
6 64 4
44
5 5
5 64

645
64

5
4

64
64

645
5
644 64
5

644
64
4 64
64

644

5
644

64
644

64
5
5
64 64

645
5

645
6

64
5
64

5
643
644

R ROW
644

5
P
644

P451

0
645
64
6
S450

645
64
4

645
64
645

645
64
5
64

4
5
4
644

650
645
6
4
64
4

5
64

5
64
644

P470

4
6
EX PIPE PR 48" ROUND EQUIVALENT STORM SEWER 645

650 S451

64
5

4
64

649 (BY OTHERS) PR ROW 4

4 64
4
644

646
PR 36" STORM SEWER P450 6

5
S469 PR 48" STORM SEWER

64
645

4
64
3
64

5
(BY OTHERS)

64
3
64

P449

5
S471 645 (BY OTHERS)
P473

64
P471
645 S449 64
3

18"
645 S472

646

3
P469

64
P474

644
S470

644
PR ROW S473 PR ROW 645 64
4

P472

4
64
P475
S474 EX ROW
645

645 645 648

646
645
647 647

P403 650 650

645
64
645

2+ 00
9

EX ROW 645 S443 S447 S475

645

S405 P412
S403 P443 645 P448 P447
ON 1360+ 00

O N 137
S414

P-5
P405
S412 P414
P455 P410 S413
S404 S448
647

S401 P401 S402 P402 P405

P440 S411

EET PD
S455
P406 S410 P413
S409
PDP-3

P310 P416 S419

SB I-294 S417 P411
S406

I
P428 P409
P425

E STAT
P415 P419 P407 P434
P417 S428
P423 P432
S416 S408
S415 S420
649

P429 S407
NE STATI

SEE SH
P427 +00
370
SEE SHEET

S423 1
S429 P408
1360+00 1365+00

IN
S435

L
P420
S434
S433

H
PR ¡ I-294 S421 S427 S456 P435
S422 S424 S432
P431
M ATCH LI

C
S418 S431

M AT
P424 P430 P433
P321 NB I-294 P422 P426
P418 S430 P456
P440
S425
S439 S426
P436
S438 P439
655
P438 P441 S441
S436 S440
650
655
655
655 650 EX ROW
655
655 650 6
47

645 MT
645

645
646

PERM ES
EX ROW 644
643
647

642 642

3
64 647
641
44
6
644

641
646

6
64
PERM ESMT
645

PERM ESMT
644

64
7
643

S437
643
64
0
64
6 647
8
64
647
1
64

64
7
9
642

63
4
64

64
646 7
6
641

4
2
646 64
6

6
4
0
64

6
P437
646
64

7
6
2

64
64
646 647
7
645 64

647

7
64
640

64

Drainage boundary for proposed

639

7
0

64
64

7
645

Proposed flow path

643 6
64 47
6

647
647
47
6
644
com:

647

64 647 64

ditch. Parameters are as follows:

2 4
639

6
64
64
3
64
64 5 641

644
4
64 2
647

3
641 4 64

64

647
646
6

64
46

3 1
bentley.

64
646
645

Area = 0.95 Acres

643 64
4 6
4

7
7

64
641 64

7
645 3

64
644

645 647
645
646

6
4
8
644
647

C = 0.65 (dense residential area)

647

646
646 646 645

648
646

647
646
646

647
\\aecom-na-pw.

Tc = ~ 10 mins
647

647
646 647
647

645
6

647
4

645

643
6

COMMONWEALTH AVENUE

646
646
6

I = 9.48 in/hr
47

7
647

64
647
46
6

646
Q (50) = 5.8 cfs
646
647 6
64
647

64 64 64
6 7 64

64
64
6 64 7
7
64

8
7
643
7

Note that the drainage boundary

648

647
648

648

7
64
647
648
647

648
= pw:

extends onto the next page.

647
647
648

64
8 64 648
64

8
64

64
7 6
8

64 648

8
648
7
64
64

6
64 8

648
4
4
8

64 648 64
8
648 6 648
48
64
6
64

8
4

648
64
8
8

648
648 647

64
9 64
647 6

100-YR FEMA FLOODWAY

FILE NAM E

647
646 64 648
7 6
64
647

6
64
644
646
648

6
646

64
64
7
7

100-YR FEMA FLOODWAY

64

6
646 646 64
647
646
646 647
64
7
6
5 64
64
645

64
645 4
645
645
645

64
3

643
644

643

642
0000 '/ in.

641
640
639
638
637
636
635
634

63
3

63
2
631
630

FLAGG CREEK
PLOT SCALE = 100.

0 50 100 150

SCALE IN FEET
33 AM

= 5/24/2022
30:
= 10:

REVISIONS
THE ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONTRACT NO. I-21-4832 PDP-4
LMN 4/8/22 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
PLOT DATE

DRAWN BY DATE
PLOT TIM E
REVIEWED

2 7 0 0 O G D E N A V E N U E DRAWING NO.
LAYOUT

DRAINAGE PLANS
DRAWN

D O W N E R S G R O V E,
CHECKED BY SSB DATE 6/1/22 294 OF 1161
I L L I N O I S 6 0 5 1 5 STA 1360+00 TO STA 1372+00
 647

64

647
7
64
5
645

645

64
7
OAS
DRAINAGE NOTES IS

64
64

64
4

4
5
64

44
7

64

6
64
4

DRAINAGE LEGEND
646

647

64
6
44

7
64
4

645
647
1. SEE TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FOR TEMPORARY DRAINAGE WORK
6
64

DURING CONSTRUCTION.

645
647

6
4
5
644

645
644 64
4

T
PROPOSED STRUCTURE/ 645 646

3
4

645
6

644
4

H S
7
64

S100
4
5 64
6 644 4
64
64
645 5

HEADWALL NUMBER 645

643

T
64
5

64
5

H S
55T
64
6

64
644 644

64

5
5
64 645
6 646

5
64

644
PROPOSED PIPE NUMBER

47T
P100

7
64
646

64
6
4 644 64
5

5
6
644

644
Pond overflow location. Overflow
64
7
646 64
4

646
645

645
64
6
64

from pond is directed to structures

4

6
64

647
3
64
4
64
4 644 64
646

The invert of structure S555 is set at S561 and S562 which are set
dgn

64
647

5
646

642.00 which is approximately 7" approximately 2.5 feet below the top
644
AECOM _DS16_NA\Documents\60545817-Central Tri-State DCM \0400 W ork Packages\I-17-4298-SG3\31-C06\01 - DGN\12 - SHT\05-Drain\4298-C06-sht-drain05-TSC.

643

above the 100-year HWL of the pond. of berm (645.00)

6
64
644
64

6
6

64

645
646

7
64 64 647
643

The pond overflow is also set at an

645
5
64
3 64

6
5

6
4

4
6
646
646 6
4
6

644
64
6
64
elevation (642.30) below the point at

7
643
6

647
642 64 646

641

64

64
4
64
7

7
644

6
647

47

644
64

2
Rim elevations @ 642.36.
646

64
643

64
which water would spill outside the
4
64

5
6

645
64

642

64
643

642

6
47
43
6

Tailwater condition resulting from

64
6

permanent easement (643.00).

646

4
64

645
646

643
5
64

6
64
connection to 49th Street Ditch:
5
64
64
645

647

646
646
10-yr @ 639.27
644

64
644

645
646
645
6 6
46
64 64
64 4
644

50-yr @ 641.48
4

2
4

64
64

64

64
4

3
64
64 3

EX PIPE
64
5 644 646
4
644
644
643

100-yr @ 642.54
643

645

6
4
6

45
3
64

6
645

646
646
647

500-yr @ 644.22
2
645

64
644 64
64

6
4 6
64
6
645 4
6

648
3 64 644
64

644
5

P
5
64

RR
642

642 5
64 64

Note that the rim elevations are

646 4
647

OW
650 644

646
644

P501
9
4 648 645 64
6 647 3
649

645
64
646 6
645 4
651 64 64
649 5

644
650 4
64

643
647 646
8

642
64

6
set at 642.36 to collect any

4
6

7
64 4
6 5
651

64
7
650 648 8 64
64 649

5
64
647 64
8 65 649 5
0 651
650

64

645
64 9

5
2 646

648
65
7 64
651
653 648

65
S501
651

overflow from the detention pond.

65 650
2
6 652 9

644
646
64
64

647
4
65 6 647 8
3

643
6 2
4 649 65
5

6
64
653
651

S551

0
648

EX PIPE
647
648
648 651
644

652

6
64

652

4
654

E
650

9
X RO 650
647 651
649
645

64
644 653

W
2 643
649
646

P502
65 653

647
650 652 3

S554
648 64
9

64
P503

5
1 650
65

650
647 645
645

65
65
647

644
4
649 651 653
00

65
646
650

645
648
652
652
64
8
5
S553 PR ROW

650
64
650 649
649
644 647 4
64

0
651 650
6
3 651 4

0
64 64
644 646 652 65

S502
650 3

650
649

65
65

PR ROW 651

P566
648

646
645 648 651
643 645
649 652
372+

PERM ESMT PERM ESMT

3
647 643

650

64
650 651 647

S503
648
644

645

0
646

643
644

S552 647
646
649
650

645

644
645
648

647 650 649

646 64
3
644

645
P-4

645

P547
643

645 643

643
PR ROW PR ROW

643
3
64

S547 644
ON 1

S566 P507 EX ROW

T PD

650 645 650 645 650 650

P516 S549 645 650
645
650

ON 1386+ 00
TATI

PR ¡ I-294 S550 S507 P512

P549 P511
S504 S506 P513 S514 P514 S515
SH EE

S516 P550 S505 P510 P515

S508 S512
P504 S511
S P505 S531
BI
-294 P506 S513
NE S

S510 P615

PDP-6
P508
P531
P509 S525 S526 S535
SEE

S518
S509 P533
H LI

1375+0 S519
0 S520 S523 S524 P530
S522 S527 S533 S534

NE STATI
Proposed flow path

SEE SHEET
M ATC

S517 1380+00 1385+00

P537
S528 S530 P534 P535
P517 P518
P520 S565
S538 P522 P525 S532
NB I P529 P532
-294

M ATCH LI
S537 P565 P528
655 P622
P519 S521 P523 P526
6
E45 650 S542 P543
X ROW 660 P559 S529
655
P521 P524 P527 S545
645 P538 P539 P540
64

P542 S543
6
64

655
646

PE
45

64

RM E S539 S559
5

647

S 660
MT 650 S544
5

645 655
5

64
S561 S540 S541 P544
6

P541
64
7

645
647
PERM E 646

SMT 640 655 655

650 645 655 650 650 650
650 655 645
650 650
64
5
640 5
64 4 645
647

64
7 4
6 EX ROW

64
64

64

64 645
644 64
645 4 645

645
4

644 645
64

5
5

5
S555 S557
644

PR ROW
646 644 4
64

4
64
64
64

5
5
645

644

PR ROW P562 S563 P563 P545

P555
647

P560 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE 64

4

S562

644
64

64

4
5

64
644
5
7 64
64 8
64

64

645
4
4

4
6
64
5 5

6
64
S556

45
64

S560

6
64 645 5

P561

44
5

645

645

644
64
645

647 4

643

645
647

643

640
com:

64
645

3
647

643
642 6
45
647

644
64 5
64

P558
648
6
45

6
645

4
64

5
6
64

P 64

642
RP
3
bentley.

7 7

P
64

646
4
64 64 6
646

1
6

RR
5

64

ERM

641
6

64
64
64

OW

5
647 4 642

5
S558
644

4
45
EAS

64

640
6
SEE DETENTION POND

5
64

646
EM
642 645
646

640

644
647

ENT 64

639
2

4
64

64

64
2 6
64

5
646
DETAIL SHEET DDET-5

8
4

63
P
641

643

RT

637
5

646
641

634
\\aecom-na-pw.

EM 641

635
64

2 6

63
635
64 4
644

PE
5
7

6
64 6

45
645
8 64
6 5

ASE
47 4
5 6

64

634
CO
647

4
6

7
63
9

ME
647

0 2
64 4

MM
64

646
6

NT
5
7 64
644
6
63

64

64
0
646 643 64
9

ON

645
7
647

64
9 64
644

646
45
0
EAL
641

645
64
6 6
647

642

646
T
6
64

HA
64

641
3
8

646 64

64

5
64
5
64

64

6
VEN
64

644
6
8

643
645

642
UE
648

647 644
64

Backflow preventer placed Rim elevation @ 644.09.

8
64
639

6
641

64
= pw:

3
642

645
5
64
644

64

644
8
643 64
646
644
5

64
64

645
646 6 642

5
42

on downstream end of pipe Tailwater condition resulting from

8

64
645 64

645
5

2
3
64

64
647 64
3
641 5
641 64
645
64
7 5
64

647
64
646

641
5
6 644 640

643
64 642
646

P559 to prevent backwater connection to 49th Street Ditch:

64

64 6
42 64 645

64
0
648
7

4
647

646

4
FILE NAM E

640
6
646

3
64

64
646
646
647

644
from 49th Street Ditch. 10-yr @ 639.27

639
Drainage boundary for proposed
646 639
6
3
9

638
64
6

637

634

635
636
635
64

50-yr @ 641.48
6

636

3
637

4
6
ditch. Parameters are as follows:

638

641643
647
40

639
6

9
64

63

640
64
647

63
1
646

4
5 5

4
5
6
4 64
6

64
100-yr @ 642.54
64
647

64
7
7

Area = 0.95 Acres

647
46

64

Bottom of pond @ 639.20

647
0

7
64
645

64
8 3
64
63

4
9

64
647

647

500-yr @ 644.22

645
64
C = 0.65 (dense residential area)

39
647
7

Overflow elevation @ 642.30

6
64

5
0000 '/ in.

64

64
2
647

8 6
64

4
4
64

6
646

64
64

6
4

5
6

64
47

Tc = ~ 10 mins
647

64

Top of Berm @ 645.00

8

647

5
64
64

64
5

642

64
I = 9.48 in/hr
8

5
64

2-yr HWL @ 639.80

64
6

3
64

64
645

645

5
0
64

641
1

Q (50) = 5.8 cfs

638
64
6

100-yr HWL @ 641.30

46
PLOT SCALE = 100.

63
8
4
64

64
8 5
64 6
45

Note that the drainage boundary

645
645
639

64
0

643
643
646

6
64

extends onto the previous page.

64
645

645
646

645
46

4
642

64
6

5
64
644

64
6

5
64

4
64
646

64
0 50 100 150

64
4

5
64
644 4
6
45

645
5

64
64

646

5
45 AM

= 5/24/2022

4
64

SCALE IN FEET

5
64
644
30:

64
6
644
= 10:

5
64

645
REVISIONS
THE ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY CONTRACT NO. I-21-4832 PDP-5
LMN DATE 4/8/22
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
PLOT DATE

DRAWN BY
PLOT TIM E
REVIEWED

2 7 0 0 O G D E N A V E N U E DRAWING NO.
LAYOUT

DRAINAGE PLANS
DRAWN

D O W N E R S G R O V E,
CHECKED BY SSB DATE 6/1/22 295 OF 1161
I L L I N O I S 6 0 5 1 5 STA 1372+00 TO STA 1386+00
 64
4 4

4
64

64
6

64
64
643
4
64

645
6
46
64

644
646
6
4

645
64

646 3
64 64
6

644
6

OAS
4
64 5

645
4

644
64
DRAINAGE NOTES

4
IS

64
64 643

3
3

5
5 64 64

64
3

644
645
4
64

645
64
64

DRAINAGE LEGEND
643 4

644

644
5
64 64

4
43

64
644
645 5 6

1. SEE TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FOR TEMPORARY DRAINAGE WORK

3

643
64

64
64

645
4

4
644
64 3

645
4
64
4
64

DURING CONSTRUCTION.

64
64
64
3

4
64 3
4 3 64
64
645

PROPOSED STRUCTURE/

643
64

T
5
646 643
643

645
6
4

H S
4

S100 64
5 64

HEADWALL NUMBER
4 5
64

T
64
2 2
64
4

644
5
6
645

644

643

H S
55T
3
64
642

2
64
4
64

643

64
5
64

4
64
3

P100 PROPOSED PIPE NUMBER 64 3

64

47T
643

644
644

3
64

64
644

3
64
4
64
3

43
643

6
4
64
643

642
645 2

644
644
64 643

642
646

643
5
4
6
643

64
3
64

64
643

64

4
6
4
4

6
64
5 643
646

643
64

642
3 6

3
643 64

64
64

642
6 645 6
64 645 4
3
6 5 64
4
6 3
64

642

64
4

646
64

647

643
6
64 64
5 2
dgn

644
64
2

644
64
3 3

644
64
AECOM _DS16_NA\Documents\60545817-Central Tri-State DCM \0400 W ork Packages\I-17-4298-SG3\31-C06\01 - DGN\12 - SHT\05-Drain\4298-C06-sht-drain06-TSC.

643
6 643
64 4
5 3

64
3 3

64
64 64

5
5
2

4
5

643

3
6
4
64 6 6
4

643
4 4

5
64

64
641

64
2

64
64

64
2
64 4

645
3

3
4

4
64
6 64

643

4
4

646

64
64 64
1 64
3

3
3

643
6 43
64 6

4
64
644
64 644
4
641
6
45

645
642
641

5
64

64
644

64
643

4
4

645
646
645 645

642

645
6
64

44
3 64
5

643

645
645 2

644
64
645

642

64
5
4

64
6

64

5
5
5
6 64
46

64
642

5
3
645

64
6
3 45
64

643
3
64 6

644

646
4

645
642 3

642
4
64

691
64
642 3

645
5 645
4

45
6

5
5

4
644

644
6

64
64

6
3
64
3 64

5
64 645 64
4 5

CONNECTION WITH PR CULVERT EXTENSION

643
6

644
4
6

6
4
6
645

5
645
4
64

64
64

645

644
2
645 6
4

645

642
64 5

64
3
6
4

5
3
3
64

64
64 64
4

3
646
3

64

3
645

64
646
64
64
4
64

3
3 5

2
64 64

643
645

5
5
6

64
4
5 642

643
2
64
64 645

645
2

64

643
692

2
64
643

643
5 5

3
64 64

64
64

W
5

64

5
643 64

4
2

64
CONNECTION WITH PR CULVERT EXTENSION

65
64

RO

1
64
4

64
3

P646 P650

645
64

645

5
642 5

643
646

W
643

64

6
45
3

643
64
2
64

EX
64
6

3
64

RO

65
4
3 64

2
3

4
3
64

64
6

2
64
3
644

5
64

6
4

645
5

647
S646

1
643

64
64 644

642
4
644 4
64

EX PIPE S647

64
645

64
S651

64

8
PR

9
4

650
64
5
4
64
644

646
3 64 642
64
642 2

641
643

3
0

64
64 64
3 3
64 4
64
4

P641 6
43 64
3
2

644
6

65
S554
64

643

6
2 4
64
642

P651

65
64

5
2

642
S642
2 1

3
64 64 643

641
64

641
S640

654
643

644

3
64

64
2

64
642
642

2
64

CONTRACT

64
CONTRACT
2

P644

65
641
1
64

3
643

P503
642 641

S643

643
P643

641
64

S650

4
P647
643 3

I-21-4832 I-21-4833
642

S641 P642

643

64

M P 26.
3
PERM ESMT S644
2

PERM ESMT

66
1
64

664
64

COLUMBIA ROAD

0
(BY OTHERS)

657
640
S601 640 642
642

641
PR ROW 641 643

651
PR ROW 6
S652
645
4
5 635 EX ROW 6
44

652
645
EX ROW

66
P652

5
64
EX ROW 645 645

647

6
640635
645

5
650

661
5
650
ON 1386+ 00

P603 P605 P606 S606 P607 S607 S614

S603 P604 S604 S608 S609 S613
P610
P654
S605 P608 P614
S610 P613
S654 P655 P609
PDP-5

P515 PR ¡ I-294 P617

S612
S655 P619 P611
P615 P602
SB I-294 P612
S602 P616 S616 S617 S618 S619 S611
S615 S620
NE STATI
SEE SHEET

1390+00 1395+00 1400+00

S621

400
S656
P621

+0
S657
S622 S635 P656

0
M ATCH LI

NB I-294 P657
P622 P623 P618 P635 P620
P638
S623 S659
S636 P639
P624 P633 P659 S638
S628
P626 S626
P625 P627 S627 P628 P632 S632 S633 P634 S634 S639
650

651

652
653
654

648
65
5

646
650 650 650 6
5
66
5
666
668 667

66
S658
6

9
645 650 650 650

668
645

664
659

6
5
7
66
0

6
61 662

65
S625

66
8

3
64
4
64

64

645

649
645

645
6
46

S624 645

EX ROW P636
5

645
64
4 644
64
4 64
4 P658

650

47T
644

S653 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE 64

4

P630 S630 S631 640

653
644 645

668
651
640 S637

H S
64
3

652
64
645

7
P653
64

668
5
645

645
645

P631

647

667
644

643
65

667
P637
648
645
com:

TRE
4

3
664
64

66
646 643

665
4
64 2
4 644
66

6
64

66
7
6
5
644

66
64

5
641

6
693

654
64 645 642
644

64

6 665

0
53
bentley.

66
645

64 9
65
64

4
7 639

655

66
5

64

659
5

64
5

3
64

1
0

648
3
64

645 66

646
640 2

CONNECTION WITH BOX CULVERT

64

656
645
5

ET
COMPENSATORY STORAGE SITE
66
1
6

644
44

6
6
64 64
642

0
657
64
6 7 653
64 63 1
9 64 64
5 9
64 64 5
5 638 4

65
8
SEE DETAIL SHEET DDET-6
65
644

0
\\aecom-na-pw.

645

64
636

645
5
637

649
638

645

694
639640

64
64 644 4
641

2
645

64
645

635
8

646
651
64
63

644
7

65

CONNECTION WITH EX CULVERT 640 0

636

6
64

44
643

647
637

6
64

638
63
5

63
5
8

6 64
2

1
63
7

4 64 64
635

Downstream Water Surface Elevations

64
643 3
3

0
44
64

6
63

636 5
4

64 3
645

2
64
1

63
0
4

64
6

64
2
645 64 644

5
644
63 640

63
4 4
64
5 634
3
642

3
64

P563 639

10-yr @ 639.27
64
64

644
3

2
6
643 64 63

64
2 6 64
638
64

640
= pw:

2
7 3
63
4

641 641 63
64

642
1

640
4

639
63
64

638 639 641

2

635
64

639

64
50-yr @ 641.48
64

64
7
63 1 2

641
1
64 63
1

64

642
641

0
63

641
0
64 4

641
6
37
0
64

4
63
5
3

641 9
3

63
64

63 6
6

6
63
633

63
3
4

639

100-yr @ 642.54
643

64
64

64 8
63
63 1
FILE NAM E

640
6
634

7 1
63
64

63

9
634

38
6 63
3

63
5

63
63

6
633

4
8
637 635
639

63
5
63

0
9
64

63
2
2

642
64

64
643 1
633

632 640

64
644 640

640
640
644

0
64

500-yr @ 644.22
642

64

64
643

1
4
63

640
639

0
63
634
637
636

640

0
3

642

634
640
644

0
642
645
64 8 636

64
63
64

641
63
0
4

0 64
6

0
633
643
637
636

634
635 63
8
640
64

645

64

Note that the top of the existing box culvert at

63

640
634
5

7
63

643 5
8

639
5 2
63 63
4

4
64

632
64
643

2 6
3

0
3

64
63

64
638
645

64

64 4 64 640 64
640 4
0 5
633
641

64
8

63 1
63

638
64
634 6

640
639

634
647

0
64
6 4
645

638

the connection of Pipe 563 is 641.39

648
63

640
641 63 64
2
640

64 632

653

651

649
652
4
5 5

650

648
637

646

644
645
65

647
65
63 64 6
0000 '/ in.

0 7 9 65
64
63 63

63
9 4 63

4
63 650

9
8
640

6 6

63
641
645

640
7
638

63
5 63
5
651
64

63 640
633
5

9 652

64
658
8
644

643

64

3
659

640
63 660

64
653 662

0
1
639

64
64

63
W

663
643

6 65
3

6
3 4

640
64
RO

638
645

644
64
0
64
0

0
63
8 65
7 634

PR
5
63 2

638
633
0
63
639

640

1
637

656

66
643
5

665
64

RR 640

645
641

665
640

661 6
0
5

OW

64
7
1
64

6
5
645

645 9 3
6
643

63

5
645 63

640
641

646

665
64
63

641
6
4
64

65
3
PLOT SCALE = 100.

1
642

635
8
64

100-YR FEMA FLOODWAY

63

8
4
63

634
63

635
5

65
63
645

647
644
640 632

9
635
64
634

66
5 637
639

0
635
640
5
64

6
641

6
644

4
64

6
4

3
64

64

63

6
5

64

64

4
0

635

8
645

635
645 5
63
6
4

64

9
2

63
4

649
635
4

634
636
64

642

635
632
638
633
6
3
8 2
645
6 63

65
4
3 63
8
63

6
63

0
645

4
5
64

7
63
635

9
64

3
6

635
5

651
64
637

644

3
63
639
3
643

63

64

64
4

0 5
64

63

2
641

635

652
6
638

40

64 632
63

50 100
3

0 150
5
64

645

642
646
647

644
650

3
648

8
649
65

641
4

651

64

639

63
655
656

640
657
658

2
3
634

4
63

3
641

65
65
9
66

65
0

9 63

0
6
64

65
4 3
63

66
K
632

640

66
638
5

REE
64

645

63
644

662
654
64

6
43

645
37
645 631
4

635

643
64

644 643 633

GC
64 64

640
3
5
642

655
1
64 641 64
5
640

G
642
9 64
63

644
2
53 PM

SCALE IN FEET A
644
645

L
= 6/6/2022

9
63

656
7

661
63
644 63 6 1
63 32
638

3
645

6 9
63

661
63 4
63
4
64

64