[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
83 views8 pages

Answer Control System

1) The document analyzes two root locus problems involving loop transfer functions with poles and zeros. 2) For the first problem, the range of K for stability is determined to be greater than 568.92. 3) For the second problem, which has 3 poles and 1 zero, the range of K for stability is determined to be greater than 284461.54.

Uploaded by

jethro kimande
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
83 views8 pages

Answer Control System

1) The document analyzes two root locus problems involving loop transfer functions with poles and zeros. 2) For the first problem, the range of K for stability is determined to be greater than 568.92. 3) For the second problem, which has 3 poles and 1 zero, the range of K for stability is determined to be greater than 284461.54.

Uploaded by

jethro kimande
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

a)

We start with the loop gain transfer function:

N (s ) 1300 K 1300 K
G ( s ) ⋅ H ( s )== 2 =
D ( s ) s −739600 (s +860)( s−860)
The characteristic equation (i.e., the denominator of the closed loop transfer function) is
N ( s)
1+ K ⋅G(s )⋅ H (s)=0 ,∨1+ K ⋅ =0
D ( s)
which we can rewrite as:
D( s)+ K ⋅ N (s )=s2−739600+ K (1300)=0
If we plot the roots of this equation as K varies, we obtain the root locus. A program (like
MATLAB) can do this easily, but to make a sketch, by hand, of the location of the roots as K
varies we need some information:

 The numerator polynomial has no zeros.


 The denominator polynomial yields n = 2 pole(s) at s = -860 and 860. Therefore, there
are 2 branches to the locus.
 There exists q = n - m = 2 - 0 = 2 closed loop pole(s) as K→∞, |s|→∞

Angle of asymptotes are at odd multiples of ±180°/q (i.e ±90° in this case)
The poles of the loop gain (-860 and 860) sum to Σp=0.00.
The zeros of the loop gain () sum to Σz=0.00.
The intersect of the asymptotes, σa=(Σp-Σz)/q = 0.
The intersect is shown with a pink diamond, the asymptote(s) by a pink line.
Range of K for stability

s2−739600+ K (1300)
Using R-H criterion
2
s 1−739600+1300 K
1
s 0
0
s −739600+1300 K
For stability
−739600+1300 K >0
739600
K>
1300
K >568.92
b)
We start with the loop gain transfer function:
N (s ) 1300 K (s +200)
G ( s ) ⋅ H ( s )= =
D ( s ) ( s+ 860 )( s−860 ) ( s +1000 )
1300 K ( s+ 200 )
G ( s ) ⋅ H ( s )= 3
( s +1000 s 2−739600 s−739600000 )

The characteristic equation (i.e., the denominator of the closed loop transfer function) is
N ( s)
1+ K ⋅G(s )⋅ H (s)=0 ,∨1+ K ⋅ =0
D ( s)
which we can rewrite as:
3 2 2
D( s)+ K ⋅ N (s )=s +1000 s −860 s−739600000+1300 K ( s+200)=0
To make a sketch, by hand, of the location of the roots as K varies we need some information:

 The numerator polynomial has 1 zero(s) at s = -200.


 The denominator polynomial yields n = 3 pole(s) at s = -1000, -860 and 860. Therefore,
there are 3 branches to the locus.
 There exists q = n - m = 3 - 1 = 2 closed loop pole(s) as K→∞, |s|→∞.

In the loop transfer function, G(s)H(s) we have n=3 poles and m=1 finite zeros, so we have q = n
- m = 2 zeros as s→∞.
Angle of asymptotes are at odd multiples of ±180°/q (i.e ±90° in this case)
The poles of the loop gain (-1000, -860 and 860) sum to Σp=-1.00e+3.
The zeros of the loop gain (-200) sum to Σz=-200.
The intersect of the asymptotes, σa=(Σp-Σz)/q = -400.
The intersect is shown with a pink diamond, the asymptote(s) by a pink line.
Range of K for stability
s3 +1000 s 2−8602 s−739600000+1300 K (s+ 200)=0
Using R-H criterion
3
s 1−1300 K
−860 −1000 ( 860 )−2600 K
2 2 2
s
1 −8602 +1300 K−( −1000 ( 8602 ) −2600 k )
s 2
0
860
s0 −1000 ( 8602 )−2600 K

For stability
−1000 ( 860 ) −2600 K > 0
2

1000 ( 8602 )
K>
2600
K >284461.54
Given the torque equation

M =10 ( 1−e )
−t

At initial time of 0 seconds to final time 3 seconds, we apply integration to compute the angular
momentum. Since angular moment is the product of the moment of inertial I and angular velocity
ω. Thus
3
Iω=∫ Mdt
0
3
Iω=∫ 10 ( 1−e ) dt
−t

0
3
Iω=[ 10 ( t + e ) ]1 =10 ( ( 3+e ) −( 0−e ) )=10 [ 3+0.04979−1 ] =20.498
−t −3 −0

But
2
I =m k
Where m is the mass of the wheel and k is the radius of gyration of the wheel.
Thus
2
m k ω=20.498
Thus,
20.498 20.498
ω= 2
= 2
=1.051 rad / s
mk 75 (0.5 )
From the above diagram, let N is the reaction force due to the car, μs N is the friction force and
mg is the weight of the car due to gravity.
With no friction
In the y direction
∑ F y=0
Ncos ( 30 ) −mg=0 (1)
o

In the x direction
∑ F x=0
m v2
Nsin ( 30o )− =0(2)
ρ
Where v is the speed of the car
Solving equations (1) and (2) simultaneously we have
Ncos ( 30 )∗sin ( 30 ) −mg∗sin ( 30 )=0
o o o

2
mv
Nsin ( 30 )∗cos ( 30 )− cos ( 30 )=0
o o o
ρ

Thus
2
mv
−mg∗sin ( 30 ) + cos ( 30 )=0
o o
ρ

( v2
m −g∗sin ( 30o ) + cos ( 30o ) =0
ρ )
Making v the subject
g∗sin ( 30 )
o
2
v= ρ
cos ( 30 )
o

v=√ gρ tan ( 30 o )
ft
v=√ 32.2∗1200∗tan ( 30o )=149.26
second
Converting to miles per hour (1ft/s = 0.6818 mph), thus,
v=101.8 mph
With friction
For v minn=0 the n
−1 −1
θmaximum =tan ( μ s ) =tan ( 0.9 ) =41.987
For v max x

In the y direction
∑ F y=0
Ncos ( 30 ) −mg−μ s Nsin ( 3 0 )=0
o o

N (0.866)−m(32.2)−0.9 N (0.5)=0
m ( 32.2 )
N= (3)
0.416
In the x direction
∑ F x=0
2
m v maxx
Nsin ( 30o )+ μ s Nsin ( 3 0o ) − =0
ρ
m v maxx 2
Ncos ( 30 ) + 0.9 Nsin ( 3 0 )=
o o
( 4)
1200
Substituting (3) in (4) we have that:
2
m ( 32.2 ) m ( 32.2 ) m v maxx
( o
co s 30 +0.9 ) (
sin 3 0 =
o
)
0.416 0.416 1200
2
( 32.2 ) ( 32.2 ) v
( o
co s 30 +0.9 ) (
sin 3 0 =
o
) maxx
0.416 0.416 1200
v maxx2=1200
(
(
32.2
0.416
)
( 0.886 )+ 0.9
( 32.2
0.416
)
)
( 0.5 ) =11835.47
v maxx =344.58 ft /s

Converting to miles per hour (1ft/s = 0.6818 mph), thus,

v=235 mph
We first factorize the higher order polynomial in the denominators
Given s^2+5s+30, then
( −b ± √b 2−4 ac ) (−5 ± √52−4 (1) ( 52 ) )
s= =
2a 2
( −5± √ 25−4( 1) ( 52 ) )
s= =−2.5 ± 4.8734 i
2
Given s^2+27s+50, then
( −b ± √b 2−4 ac ) (−27 ± √27 2−4 (1)( 52 ) )
s= =
2a 2
( −27 ± √ 729−4 (1) ( 52 ) )
s= =−13.5 ±11.4127=−2.0873 ,−24.9127
2

You might also like