Eye-Pointing Classification Scale
Eye-Pointing Classification Scale
Eye-Pointing Classification Scale
Classification Scale
Purpose
The eye-pointing classification scale (eyePoint scale) is a tool to support professionals and families in
describing looking behaviours related to eye-pointing in non-speaking children with cerebral palsy
affecting their whole body. The eyePoint scale describes looking behaviours in five levels.
Background
Children with cerebral palsy affecting the whole body who have little or no functional speech, and who
cannot use limb movements to point or select, are often reliant on using their eyes to communicate and
engage with the world.
Professionals observe children’s looking behaviour during assessment as a way of determining receptive
language and cognitive abilities in this otherwise hard to assess population. Deliberate eye gaze fixations
can also be used as an access method for augmentative & alternative communication (AAC).
Although the term eye-pointing is often used when describing children’s looking behaviours, there is often
poor agreement between professionals concerning which looking behaviours constitute genuine eye-
pointing for communication and which do not. A lack of consensus can have profound implications for
clinical practice.
What is eye-pointing?
We describe eye-pointing as: “the context-relevant, controlled and intentional use of gaze in order to direct
one or more partner’s visual attention to any item or object for a deliberate communicative purpose. Other
communication modes (facial expression, vocalisation, head movement and body position) may be
employed, as available, to support the use of gaze.” (1. pp.479)
For example, by shifting gaze between an object and a partner’s face the child might draw their partner’s
attention to that object, for example to comment on it, to ask about it or to request it.
Effective and fully developed eye-pointing is an interpersonal activity, involving collaborative interaction
between the child, their partner, and the environment.
When a child eye-points to an object, there may be a period of negotiation between the child and their
partner concerning the intended meaning of the eye-point. Sometimes the specific context in which the
child uses eye-pointing allows the partner to know the meaning of the eye-point without the need for
explicit negotiation of meaning. As a consequence children’s use of eye-pointing skills may vary with
context and partner.
Eye-pointing skills may be spontaneously initiated by the child or generated in response to others’ actions.
1.Sargent, J, Clarke, M. T., Price, K., Griffiths, T., & Swettenham, J. (2013). Eye-pointing in children with severe cerebral palsy: What are we
looking at? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 477-485.
1
© University College London (UCL)
Instructions
Use the five-level eyePoint scale and summary table below to classify the child’s looking behaviours in
relation to eye-pointing.
Select the level that best describes the child’s typical looking behaviour during everyday activities. This
approach is suggested because a number of factors can affect children’s use of looking skills (e.g. physical
positioning and stability, use of medication, fatigue, general health, and presence of stimulating or
motivating objects).
Classification is based purely on careful observation of the child’s specific gaze behaviours, and not on the
partner’s interpretation of possible communicative function of the looking behaviours (for example, an
assumption that the child is commenting or requesting).
Where a child’s looking behaviours are thought to fall at the borderline between two levels of
classification, the lower level representing the greater degree of limitation should be ascribed.
Project team
Michael Clarke, Gabriella Aberbach, Rosie Cooper, Gurveen Panesar, Laura McLaughlin,
Jenefer Sargent, Caroline Rose, Katie Price, Tom Griffiths, Amie Woghiren, John Swettenham.
Funding
The Eye-pointing Classification Scale is the product of independent research funded by
Action Medical Research and Great Ormond Street Hospital.
Dr Michael Clarke
Language and Cognition
Chandler House
2 Wakefield Street
London WC1N 1PF
2
© University College London (UCL)
Eye-Pointing Classification Scale
I USES EYE-POINTING
Fixes gaze on object, disengages gaze from object, shifts gaze and fixes on partner’s face, returns gaze to
fix on same object and/or fixes gaze on partner’s face, disengages gaze from face, shifts gaze and fixes
on object, returns gaze to fix on same partner’s face.
Children at level I demonstrate a consistent ability to shift gaze as described in Level II. In addition, the
child will then return their gaze to the original place; the partner’s face or the object.
Children at level II do not typically demonstrate the ability to shift gaze from an object to a partner’s face
and back to the object, or from a partner’s face to an object and back to the face (as described in level I).
Children at level III are limited in their ability to shift gaze from objects to faces and/or faces to objects (as
described in Level II).
IV FIXES GAZE
Ability to fix and hold gaze.
Children at level IV will demonstrate consistent active ability to fix and hold gaze on objects or faces.
Control of fixation describes the active process of stabilising the fovea on a stationary target. The fovea is
the part of the retina which is responsible for central, sharpest vision. Fixation ability is crucial for attention
control and underpins engagement and disengagement with stimuli.
Children at level IV are limited in their ability to disengage gaze from objects or faces, shift gaze and fix on
new objects (as described in level III).
3
© University College London (UCL)
Eye-Pointing Classification Scale
Summary Table
This summary table represents a progression of the core skills presented in the eye-pointing classification
scale, which underpin and contribute to the realisation of eye-pointing.
I II III IV V
Uses eye- Shifts gaze Disengages Fixes gaze Other visual
pointing to face and shifts gaze behaviours
e.g. The child looks from a ball to the adult’s face then back to the ball.
Or
From the adult’s face to the ball then back to the adult’s face.
4
© University College London (UCL)