286
14ircraft Wheel Brakes*
                                   By D. A. L. Robson, BSc. (Eng.), A.M.1.Mech.E.t
                I n designing brakes for the landing run, account should be taken of aerodynamic forces acting on
                the aircraft that reduce the ground reaction in addition to helping to retard the aircraft. There are
                good grounds fur designing brakes with a limiting torque, because most British tail-wheeI type air-
                craft will nose over if the brake drag exceeds about 0.2-0.3 times the aircraft weight, and with tricycle
                landing gear the loads imposed on the nose-wheel structure during severe braking may be critical;
                furthermore, the danger from bursting a tyre, owing to locking the wheel, cannot be ignored. Cal-
                culations made for a hypothetical aircraft indicate that little is gained by designing for a brake drag
                in excess of about 0.3 times the aircraft weight.
                   Brakes are used both for steering and limiting the speed of the aircraft when taxi-ing, and in conse-
                quence, a very large amount of energy may have to be dissipated by them.
                   Shoe brakes are standard equipment on German aircraft, and are also widely used in America,
                but use on British aircraft is confined to the smallest types. British designers have used expander-tube
                brakes almost exclusively, but disk brakes-popular in America-are now receiving close attention
                in this country.
                   The British system of brake control is to use finger operation, with a differential mechanism
                coupled to the rudder control, but in most other countries foot pedals are employed. The British
                system necessitates power operation aimost always, but direct operation is possible when foot pedals
                are used. Pneumatic power transmission for brake operation has been widely used on British aircraft,
                but most other countries have adopted hydraulic operation.
               BASIC D E S I G N R E Q U I R E M E N T S                                  aircraft an expression can be obtained €or the aerodynamic drag,
Aircraft wheel brakes are used for other purposes than that of                            in terms of the aircraft's velocity, in the form :-
retarding the aircraft's forward motion. Their main duties, all                                                                       PA = kDv*
d which must be considered during design, are :-                                          where PA is the drag due to aerodynamic forces, 02 the forward
  (1)   To stop the aircraft after landing.                                               velocity, and k, a constant.
  (2)   T o steer the aircraft when on the ground.                                           The brake drag depends, of course, upon the degree of
  (3) T o restrict the forward speed when taxi-ing.                                       braking used. For the purposes of brake design, it is useful to
  (4) T o hold the aircraft stationary against the thrust developed                       assume that this will be the maximum possible throughout the
       when engines are run up for checking prior to take off.                            whole landing run. When the aircraft first touches down it is
  (5) T o hold the aircraft stationary when parked.                                       still fully airborne; there is no ground reaction and no brake
                                                                                          retarding force is therefore possible. As the forward speed
   The Stop. When an aircraft lands it possesses a kinetic                                decreases the ground reaction increases-since the lift decreases
energy defined by its weight and horizontal velocity, all of                              -and thus the possible retarding force increases. If the co-
which must be destroyed to bring it to rest. The brake designer                           efficient of friction between tyre and ground is p , and the
generally has to prepare his design before the aircraft is in actual                      ground reaction R, the brake retarding force, assuming the
existence, and he must therefore rely upon estimates of the                               maximum possible degree of braking, is given by :-
aircraft landing weight and speed, which are specified by the                                                                         PB = p R
aircraft designer. It is often difficult to specify the landing speed                      This can be expressed in the form :-
with accuracy, because this will vary somewhat with the landing
 technique of different pilots. However, as a first approximation,                                                   PB = y( w- kL7J2)
it may be taken as equal to the stalling speed with the flaps                              where W is the aircraft weight and Iz, a coilstant such that k , d
down. Generally the air speed at landing will be in excess of the                          gives the lift due to aerodynamic forces.
stalling speed, but, to compensate for this, there will usually                               For various reasons, which are discussed later, the maximum
be some wind, and the brakes are not normally applied until                                brake drag may be limited by other than the ground reaction
the aircraft is well on the ground, when the speed will have                               and ground-tyre coefficient of friction. If this is assumed to
fallen.                                                                                    be the case, the brake drag will increase-as the velocity falls-
   The most elementary consideration of the landing run is to                              from the point of brake application, until it reaches a figure at
regard the aircraft as being subject to the two retarding forces,                          which it will remain constant until the aircraft comes to rest.
aerodynamic drag and brake drag.                                                              When considering the landing run, aircraft can be divided
   The aerodynamic drag is a function of the square of the                                 into the two broad classes of those fitted with tail wheels, and
horizontal velocity relative to the surrounding air. For ease of                           those fitted with nose wheels or tricycle landing gear.
consideration no account has been taken, in the following, of                                 Considering first the case of conventional aircraft fitted with
wind; it being assumed that the aircraft is landing in still air.                          tail wheels, it will be realized that the arrangement is such that
From a knowledge of the aerodynamic characteristics of the                                 the aircraft centre of gravity is aft of the point of ground-tyre
                                                                                           contact. I t is clear, therefore, that the maximum brake drag is
  The MS. of this paper was received at the Institution on 18th July                       limited to a figure such that the resulting pitching moment does
1946.                                                                                      not cause nosing-over of the aircraft (Fig. 24), which figure is
  * This paper is published with the permission of the Ministry of                         dependent upon the position of the centre of gravity relative to
Supply, but the author accepts full responsibility for all statements
and opinions expressed.                                                                    the point of contact of the tyre on the ground. The farther
  t Ministry of Supply, Resident Technical Officer at Sir W. G.                            forward the main wheels are placed, the greater the brake drag
Armstrong Whitworth Aircraft, Ltd., Baginton, Coventry.                                    which can be sustained ; but there are, however, disadvantages
                                              Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                                                       AIRCRAFT W H E E L BRAKES                                                                                            287
in placing the wheels too far forward, quite apart from the                              brakes results, however, in a pitching moment which must be
installation problem of stowage when retracted. For example,                             resisted by the nose wheel, and, if high brake torques are used,
during braking the aircraft tends to be in a condition of unstable                       the resulting forces on the nose wheel structure may well
equilibrium directionally, and, should a swing develop, loss of                          become critical from a load point of view, and necessitate
                                                                                         additional strength, and consequently weight, over and above
                                                                                         that required for normal landing loads.
                                                                                            There is, therefore, little to be gained, from the point of view
                                                                                         of stopping the aircraft after landing, in designing the brakes
                                                                                         and operating mechanism for tail-wheel type aircraft with un-
                                                                                         limited torques available, and it may also be very desirable to
                                                                                         limit the maximum torque with tricycle landing gear arrange-
                                                                                         ments. A further point in favour of limiting the value of the
                                                                                         brake torque is to prevent damage to tyres. i t can be argued that,
                                                                                         as he has full control over brake application, the pilot will use
                                                                                         only that degree of braking which can be transmitted by the
                                                                                         ground without skidding the tyre. If very high brake torques
                                                                                         are made available to the pilot, it becomes essential that his
                                                                                         control should be both sensitive and possessed of a high degree
                                                                                         of “feel”; otherwise skidding of the tyres is very likely, and, as
                                                                                         they have relatively thin treads, the results of a locked wheel
                       n Tail-wheel aircraft.                                            may well be a burst tyre-if not more serious damage.
                                                                                            As an illustration of the duty of wheel brakes during a stop,
                                                                                         some figures have been worked out for a hypothetical aircraft
                                                                                         landing with the maximum possible degree of braking. Two sets
                                                                                         of calculations were made for the same basic aircraft :-
                                                                                            (1) Assuming landing tail down and remaining in the tail
                                                                                                 down attitude throughout.
                                                                                            (2) Assuming landing tail up and remaining in the tail up
                                                                                                 attitude throughout.
                                                                                         These represent the limiting conditions for the same aircraft,
                                                                                         first considered as a tail-wheel type, and secondly assuming it
                                                                                         fitted with a tricycle landing gear. In actual practice tail-wheel
                                                                                         type aircraft are seldom landed completely tail down, whereas
                                                                                         tricycle types are landed somewhat tail down and “eased” on to
                       h Nose-wheel aircraft.
                                                                                         are as follows :-
                                                                                                                             -
                                                                                         the nose wheel. The fieures on which these calculations are based
           Fig. 24. Nosing Over Tendency of Aircraft                                         W = aircraft weight .                  20,000 lb.
                                                                                             p = ground-tyre coefficieAt of
control is more likely if the centre of gravity is too far aft (Fig. 25)                             friction .                     0.8
With conventional British aircraft designs the wheels are                                    PA= aerodynamic drag, Ib. .            0 . 1 6 tail
                                                                                                                                               ~ ~ down (v ft.
generally so placed, relative to the aircraft centre of gravity, that                                                                   per sec.)
the maximum brake retarding force which can be sustained,                                                                           0 . 1 2 5tail~ ~ up
without fear of nosing over, is of the order of 0*2W-O.SW,
where W = aircraft weight.
                                                                                                aerodynamic lift, lb.       .        1 . 1 ~ 2tail down (w ft.
                                                                                                                                        per sec.)
                                                                                                                                    0.77~2tail up
                                                                                          The landing speed has been assumed as that speed at which
                                                                                         the lift is e<ud to the weight in each case, i.e. 135 ft. per sec.
                                                                                          (92 m.p.h.) tail down and 161 ft. per sec. (110 m.p.k) tail up.
                                                                                             Figures have been calculated on the basis of the aircraft
                                                                                          being subjected to retarding forces due to brakes and aero-
                        a Tail-wheel aircraft.
                        DIRECTION OF W T I O N
              c3--
4-0-.-.                    -   ~
               (--+--+                      /
                                                .o’
                                                                                                                               0     0 I   0.2 0.3 0.4     05   0.6  0.7    08
                        h Nose-wheel aircraft.                                                                                   DEStGN FRICTiON COEFFICIENT FOR 8RAKES.P
            Fig. 25. Directional Instability of Aircraft                                                     Fig. 26. Landing Run Details-Tail                 Up
  Aircraft with tricycle landing gear do not have this limitation                         dynamic drag only, and a series of values obtained assuming the
placed on the brake torque since the nose wheel prevents nosing                           maximum brake drag being limited by the design of the brake
over, and the centre of gravity being forward of the point of                             to values up to 0.8W. The results are shown graphically in
tyre contact ensures directional stability. The application of                            Figs. 26 and 27 for the tail up and down attitudes respectively.
                                            Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
288                            AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS AND                                                      EQUIPMENT
                                                                                       However, aircraft tyres are generally operated at a compara-
                                                                                       tively large static deflexion, the usual figure being in the order
                                                                                       of 35 per cent. The resistance is approximately proportional to
                                                                                       the deflexion, and is affected by speed because of the effect of
                                                                                       the latter on the ground reaction. Figs. 28 and 29 show the effect
                                                                                       of allowing for rolling resistance. The amount assumed for this
                                                                                       correction is given by :-
                                                                                                                PR= 0.02R
                                                                                                                    = 0.02( w- k,v2)
                                                                                       The effect will be seen to be small in this case.
                                                                                          Steering. T h e wheel brakes are used for directional control
                                                                                       during landing and take-off, as well as for steering during slow
                                                                                       speed taxi-ing, and the brake control must, therefore, be arranged
                                                                                       so that differential braking is possible. When landing with a
                                                                                       cross wind considerable differential braking may be required to
                           DESIGN FRICTION COEFFICIENT FOR BRAKES,           /.I
                                                                                       keep the aircraft on the runway, nnd it is therefore standard
            Fig. 27. Landing Run Details-Tail          Down                            practice to arrange the mechanism so that full brakes can be
                                                                                       applied to one wheel, while zero torque is transmitted by the
       5                                                                               other. It is clearly of very great importance, since normally the
                                                                                       brakes are the only method of maintaining directional control,
                                                                                       that they remain consistent in performance during application.
                                                                                       If one brake starts to fade during a stop, the application of the
                                                                                       other must be reduced if the aircraft is to be kept on a straight
                                                                                       course, which is unlike the case of a road vehicle where the
                                                                                       failure of one brake through fade does not affect the others,
                                                                                       except that they must do more work.
                                                                                            Taxi-ing. During taxi-ing and general ground manoeuvring,
                                                                                        the wheel brakes are used not only to steer the aircraft, but often
                                                                                        to prevent the forward speed from becoming excessive, since
                                                                                        the minimum speed of certain high-performance engines is so
                                                                                        high that the resultant thrust is sufficient to produce a consider-
                                                                                        able velocity. When proceeding round the perimeter track of the
                                                                                        aerodrome, especially at night, it may be constantly necessary
                                                                                        to apply the brakes to keep the speed of the aircraft within
                                                                                        reasonable limits. It is difficult to assess in general terms the
      Fig. 28. Landing Run Details with Rolling Drag-Tail              Up               work done by the brakes during taxi-ing, but the thrust may well
                                                                                        exceed the rolling resistance by as much as 0.03W. I n the case
                                                                                        of the hypothetical aircraft for which the landing run details
                                                                                        have been calculated, it will be seen that the total work done
                                                                                        during the most severe braked stop possible is about 4.2 million
                                                                                        ft.-lb. (tail down case). If during a taxi-ing run of 3,000 feet-
                                                                                        a not unreasonable distance-the brakes must hold the aircraft
                                                                                        back against a thrust of O.O3W, the work done will be about
                                                                                        1.8 million ft.-lb. I n itself this figure is far from inconsiderable,
                                                                                        and when it is realized that the taxi-ing may follow immediately
                                                                                        after a landing, the importance of the taxi-ing case is obvious.
                                                                                           Hold against Static Thrust. Although it is always possible,
                                                                                        and often not inconvenient, to hold the aircraft by means of
                                                                                        chocks when running up the engines, this is an undesirable
                                                                                        limitation. It is usual to run up engines immediately prior to
                                                                                        take off, and, when the starting end of the runway is far removed
                                                                                        from the ground crew base, the use of chocks is most incon-
                                                                                        venient. Wherever possible, therefore, the wheel brakes should
                                                                                        be capable of giving sufficient static torque to resist the thrust
 Fig. 29. Landing Run Details with Rolling Drag-Tail                    Down            developed during this operation. A twin-engined aircraft is
                                                                                        worse in this respect, since each wheel must have sufficient
Examination of these curves reveals two interesting points.                             brake power to resist the thrust from one engine, whereas, in
  (1) The total energy to be dissipated in the tail up case is                          the case of four-engined aircraft, the engines would be run up
      greater than in the tail down case, due to the higher                             one at a time, and, if engines of the same power are assumed,
      landing speed. The absolute value of work done by the                             the size of wheel and brake would generally be larger because
       brakes tail up is, therefore, greater than tail down, but                        of the greater size of the aircraft. I n most cases of high per-
       the proportion of kinetic energy of the aircraft which is                        formance aircraft the thrust developed during the engine run
       absorbed by the brakes at the point of landing is, in                            up necessitates a brake force greater than 0.3u7, and this con-
       each case, about 75 per cent.                                                    sideration becomes, therefore, the criterion when deciding the
                                                                                        maximum brake torque. It should be borne in mind, however,
  (2) The value of increasing the maximum brake drag beyond                             that this is a static torque and does not affect the energy absorp-
       about 0.3W is very small in both cases.                                          tion requirements.
   No account has been taken in these calculations of the rolling
resistance of the tyres j this being an additional retarding force,                        Parking. The use of brakes during parking requires little
the value of which will depend upon the particular type of tyre                         comment, except that considerable damage may be don: :i the
used, as a large-section low-pressure tyre will have a rolling                          aircraft is parked with the brakes on immediatelv aftei ianding,
resistance greater than a smaller-section high-pressure type.                           when all the brake parts are at a high temperature.
                                           Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                                                              AIRCRAFT W H E E L BRAKES                                                                     289
                                  BRAKE DESIGN                                                  Shoe Brakes. Shoe brakes were standard equipment on all
  The different types of brake used on aircraft can be roughly                               German aircraft, and are used in considerable numbers on air-
divided into two groups-drum and disk brakes. Drum brakes                                    craft of American design, but, except on small low performance
have been more widely used and are standard on most current                                  types, they have not been used extensively on British aircraft,
British aircraft. Disk brakes which have been used extensively                               principally because of the type of pilot’s control used almost
in America, and were being introduced on German aircraft                                     exclusively on British aircraft. The type of shoe brake used on
towards the end of the war, are being introduced on a few new                                aircraft differs little from corresponding road vehicle brakes :
British aircraft, but it is impossible to predict whether they will                          two types are used, those employing the duo-servo principle,
replace drum brakes to any great extent.                                                     and those incorporating two leading shoes. Typical German
   A few years ago it was standard practice with drum type                                   examples of these two types are shown in Figs. 30 and 31
brakes to press the drum into the wheel casting, this being done                             respectively.
largely to enable the wheel casting to act as a heat reservoir, and                             The general trend seems to indicate that, except For small
to help keep the brake temperature as low as possible. This                                  aircraft, the shoe brake is being superseded by other designs.
design suffered from several disadvantages and has now almost                                The duo-servo brake, which has been the type of shoe brake
                                                                                                                      CYLINDER
                      -
                                                                                                     SCREW A ~ U S T E R
                                         10              IS                 20                  25   cn.
          P   -   n   n   t   9
                                                               Fig. 30. German Duo-servo Brake
entirely been discarded. Although still mounted inside the                                    most widely used, suffers from the general disability of all
casting the drum is now separated at its periphery from the                                   brakes incorporating self energization. They are more critical
casting by an air space. When the drum was pressed into                                       to adjustment, require more careful maintenance, and are upset
the casting a fairly light steel drum was generally employed but                              more easily by changes in characteristics of the friction material
it was found that as the power required of the brake became                                   and drum distortion. Their main value has been that they permit
large the heat generated caused drum distortion of such a                                     the use of an operating mechanism not dependent upon a power
severity that it was impossible to maintain good contact between                              source, but, even in this respect, they have little advantage
the drum and the casting, and the heat path was therefore poor.                               over disk type brakes.
This resulted in excessive temperatures being generated and
consequent poor brake performance. Another equally great                                         Expander Tube Brakes. The most commonly used form of
disadvantage of this design was that the temperature of the                                   brake on British aircraft is of the expander tube type. A typical
casting at the tyre bead seat became excessive, and caused tyre                               example of one of these brakes is shown in Fig. 32, which iUus-
failures. By separating the drum from the casting it has been                                 trates an aircraft wheel and brake of current design. The brake
necessary to use heavier drums, but improved friction materials                               unit itself consists of a U-section ring attached rigidly to, or
and better methods of making drums have permitted higher                                      formed integrally with, the back plate. Resting in this U-ring
temperatures being employed, and so the weight penalty has not                                is an expandable tube made of fabric-reinforced rubber which
been excessive. The three main types of brake in current use                                  can be inflated by either air or oil. The brake shoes, in the form
are: (1) shoe brakes; (2) expander tube brakes; and (3) disk                                  of segments of non-metallic friction material riveted to steel
 brakes.                                                                                      clips, are placed outside the expander tube and encompassed
                                                 Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
290                           AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS A N D E Q U I P M E N T
b y the U-ring. Return springs reacting on the underside of the                      other designs, the three which have received, orarenow receiving,
U-ring are used to collapse the assembly when pressure is                            most attention amongst British aircraft designers are described.
removed from the expander tube. Current British designs use a
maximum pressure in the expander tube of 150 lb. per sq. in.                             Multi-disk Brakes. Multi-disk brakes have been used on a
and it is seldom that a figure of 250 lb. per sq. in. is exceeded                     number of different American aircraft types and, by the end of
with this class of brake.                                                             the war, had been developed in Germany to the point that they
   Expander tube brakes have been used for some years on                              were then just being introduced into service. A typical example
almost all British aircraft and on a number of the larger American                    is shown in Fig. 33, illustrating one of Germdn design, from
designs, but not on German aircraft. Although aircraft brakes                         which, it will be seen that the brake consists of a series of
operate at very much higher temperatures than brakes on road                          alternate fixed and rotating disks, forced into contact with one
vehicles, little trouble has been experienced with the rubber                         another by hydraulic pressure applied at a glmded annular
expander tube. The brake, being flexible, can adjust itself to                        space behind the inner disk. The clearance allowed between the
                         DOWELS
                                                 Fig. 31. German Two Leading Shoe Brake
cater for quite a large degree of axle deflexion, and can continue                    disks when the brake is off is of the order of 0.010 inch nominal,
to operate efficiently with considerable drum distortion. Also,                       but this is reduced slightly by the tolerance which has to be
it is virtually ncn-self-energizing and is not, therefore, unduly                     allowed on the flatness of the disks. These are made of chromiurn-
critical to changes in friftion characteristics, the design in-                       plated steel, and steel having a facing of a sintered powder
corporating no adjustment and requiring the minimum of main-                          metal; this combination has been arrived at over several years’
tenance. The replacement of shoes when the linings become                             development, but better ones may, of course, be found.
worn, the fitting of new expander tubes, and the replacement                             T h e use of metzl-to-metal friction results in friction properties
of drums when these become distorted through excessive use,                           largely independent of temperature, and the type of brake is
is all that is necessary to maintain serviceable brakes.                              found to be smooth and consistent in operatioc. For its size it
                                                                                      incorporates a considerable mass ol’ metal, and its heat capacity
   Disk or H a t e Brakes. Although several designs of disk brake                     is thsrrfore high, but because of its compact riature tile heat has
have been produced in this country, few British aircraft of                           dificuky in escaping, and the brake can, therefore, be damaged
rcceiit design have incorporated this type of brake unit. Several                     unless handled intelligently. The use of metal-to-metal friction
American aircraft in current use are equipped with disk brakes                        permits the use of high unit pressures, but, as this results in a
and thc Germans were on the point of adopting similar designs                         correspondingly rapid generation of heat that cannot be removed
at the end of the recent war. This type of brake is now receiving                     at anything like thc rate it is generated, it rnusr be used with
imre attention in this country and it may take its place along                        care. If overheated, the disks tend to warp and remain in contact
with other designs on future British aircraft. Although there are                     when the brake is nominally off, which leads to the continuous
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                                                     AIRCRAFT WHEEL BRAKES                                                                           291
generation of heat due to dragging of the brakes, and may result
in damage of such severity as to necessitate the replacement of
the disks. If the disks are spaced with a greater clearance to per-
mit some distortion to take place, the fluid displacement is corre-
spondingly increased, and the design loses one of its advantages
over the expander tube brake. As the design very largely depends
upon heat absorption, as distinct from heat dissipation, it is not
very suitable for applications where repeated stops are to be
made at frequent intervals, nor where a large amount of taxi-ing
with considerable brake drag is necessary, but where it is used
infrequently with a fairly well-defined energy requirement the
design has proved satisfactory.
   Single-disk Brakes. The latest types of brake to be intro-
duced for aircraft is the single-disk brake and the plate brake.
These are similar in general principle although they differ con-
siderably in detail design. T h e former is shown in Fig. 34 and
the latter in Fig. 35.
   A heavy-gauge steel disk, chromium-plated on both sides,
rotates with the wheel-the drive between this disk and the
wheel is arranged so that the former can float for alignment
purposes-and one or more pairs of pads of non-metallic friction
material are mounted facing one another on opposite sides of the
single plate. Operation of the brake consists of forcing these two
pads into contact with the rotating plate. Application is usually
by means of hydraulic pressure, but mechanical operation is
sometimes employed for the smaller sizes.
   Owing to the large area of the plate always exposed to the
atmosphere, these brakes possess good heat dissipation character-
istics. Because of the relatively small area of friction material,
high unit pressures are required to generate the requisite torque,
but, while necessitating the use of special friction materials,
this does not appear to be a disadvantage.
                 BRAKE OPERATING SYSTEMS
   Control. For the brake to be used for its various duties, the
control must enable the pilot to apply progressive braking with
adequate “feel” of the power being used, the response being                                                        Fig. 32. Expander Tube Brake
rapid and the application smooth and positive. In addition, it
must be possible to apply brakes to the two wheels differentially                      feet are much higher than by the fingers, the “feel” with foot
for steering purposes, and to hold them on at less than full
pressure without undue difficulty.                                                     operation is probably more representative of the actual brake
    Standard British practice has been to use hand operation for                       torque than with finger control.
the brake application with the differential coupled to the rudder                        The force which can be exerted by the fingers or thumb is so
control. With this arrangement the pilot moves a small hand                            low, that, with hand control, power operation is essential, whereas
lever to apply brakes, and then steers the aircraft normally by                        when foot control is employed direct operation by foot power
means of the rudder control, the rudder, of course, moving at                          alone is possible.
the same time. By this arrangement the technique of steering
an aircidt on the ground is as near as possible the same as that                           Source of Power. Direct foot-powered brakes are used widely
used in the air, and the change over in control method during                           in America and on German aircraft. Reliance on foot power is
the transition from airborne to non-airborne conditions is                              only practicable when the displacement required is small, and
reduced to a minimum. During both the landing and take-off it                           for this reason direct operation of expander tube brakes has not
is necessary for the pilot to keep one hand on the throttle and                         been successful. Duo-servo shoe brakes and the various types of
the other on the control column. For this reason it has become                          disk brake can, however, be operated satisfactorily by foot power,
standard British practice, when u s i n g hand control, to mount                        except in the large sizes where even with these designs the dis-
the brake control lever on the main control handle for operation                        placement required is too large.
either by the fingers or the thumb.                                                        When an outside source of power must be used, full advantage
    In marked contrast to the British hand control plus rudder                          can be taken of it and brakes with a high degree of self-energiza-
bar differential, American and Continental aircraft nearly all                          tion become unnecessary; thus duo-servo shoe brakes can, with
use pedal operation. Two pedals, one for each foot-generally                            advantage, be replaced by double leading shoe brakes. The
toe-operated-are mounted on the rudder control and operate,                             almost universal use on British aircraft of finger control and
by independent circuits, the port and starboard brakes. Brakes                          expander tube brakes has prevented the use of other than power
are applied by depressing the feet and differential operation by                        operated brakes in this country, except on one or two small low-
applying one brake more strongly than the other. Pedal operation                        performance aircraft. I n America, where expander tube, shoe,
 permits taxi-ing with the flying controls locked, thereby relieving                    and disk brakes have been fitted in large numbers, both power
 the pilot of holding rudder loads during cross-wind taxi-ing, but                      and direct operation have been used for some years. The intro-
 differential braking with simultaneous large rudder movement                           duction of power operation on German aircraft took place
 is sometimes difficult. When the force required to overcome                            during the war but most aircraft types in production up to the
 friction in the control mechanism becomes a large proportion                           end of the war were fitted with direct operation. This was no
 of the total force required to operate the brake, the “feel”                           doubt influenced by the small number of large aircraft in service
 becomes less representative of the brake force being used. The                         with the German Air Force.
 force which can be exerted by the pilot’s fingers is so small that
 the friction tends to reduce the representative “feel” to the pilot                      Type of Power Transmission. Fluid operation of aircraft
 with finger control. As the forces which can be exerted by the                         brakes is almost universal, but pneumatic power has been used
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
 292                                   AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS A N D EQUIPMENT
                      6 FIXED PLATES
ANNULAR 'U'
OIL INLET
                               5 R O T ~ T I N GDISKS
                            MILD STEEL FACED WITH                     0                    5                  10                   15      20   25 CM.
                                SINTERED IRON                                  I   I   I   I
                                                          Fig. 33. German Multi-disk Brake
 C Y I INnFR   UFAD     PISTON         STEEL BRAKE
                                       /  DISK
                                                                               Fig. 34. Single-disk Brake
                                                   Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                                                     AIRCRAFT W H E E L BRAKES                                                                       293
on most British aircraft, although some have employed hydraulic                       displacement is low, hydraulic operation is generally employed.
brakes. Hydraulic operation is used on nearly all American air-                       Disk and shoe brakes fall in this category, and it is normal to
craft and was standard in Germany.                                                    use hydraulic operation of these, although by suitable design
   When direct hydraulic operation is employed, a pair of foot                        they could be adapted for operation pneumatically.
pumps mounted on the rudder control operate, through in-
dependent circuits, the port and starboard brakes. This is the
simplest possible system having the highest degree of reliability,
and these features alone probably outweigh any disadvantages
associated with foot operation. Direct hyraulic brakes are not
necessarily limited to small aircraft, as the latest designs of
brake unit have such small fluid displacements required for full
operation, that even quite large brakes can be operated success-
fully by this method without unduly heavy foot loads.
   When power is necessary it is usually obtained from one
or more engine driven hydraulic pumps or air compressors,
although in some cases electrically driven pumps have been
employed as being more convenient for the particular installation.
A special system need not be installed for the operation of brakes
alone, it being quite normal practice to obtain the power from
the same system as is used for such operations as undercarriage
retraction. The control for a power operated brake consists
essentially of a variable pressure reducing valve; with foot
control a separate valve is operated by each foot, each con-
trolling one brake; with hand control and rudder coupled
differential the arrangement is such that the hand lever operates
two reducing valves simultaneously through a rocker lever
connected to the rudder control, so that with rudder fore and
aft the valves are opened equally, but when rudder is applied
the valves are opened unequally so as to apply greater pressure
to one side than the other, and so give the desired steering effect.
   The fluid required to operate a large expander tube brake
system may be quite large, and, with hydraulic operation, it is
very difficult to reduce to a negligible amount the time lag in
response, especiallywhen releasing the brake. This difficulty does
not apply to pneumatic operation, because not only can the air
be released more easily but it can also be exhausted to atmosphere
instead of having to be pushed back to a header tank, as must
always be done with a hydraulic system. Pneumatic power shows
to best advantage in conjunction with expander tube brakes: not
only because of the large displacements, but also because of the
 low pressures required. Although higher pressures are now being                                                           Fig. 35. Elate Brake
introduced, 450 Ib. per sq. in. has been the standard bottle
pressure in British pneumatic systems for aircraft, as compared
with hydraulic accumulator pressures up to 2,500 lb. per sq. in.                        Acknowledgements. The author wishes to thank the Goodyear
Clearly, the reduction in pressure required for the pneumatic                         Tyre and Rubber Company (Great Britain), Ltd., for the use
system constitutes an easier design problem than in the case of                       of Fig. 34, and the Dunlop Rubber Company, Ltd., for Figs. 32
the high pressure hydraulic system. When the design of brake                          and 35 and for their assistance in the preparation of Figs. 2431
is such that high operating pressures can be used, and the fluid                      and Fig. 33.
                                           Discussion in London
Air Commodore J. OLIVER       (Wolverhampton) said that his own                        of higher performance, certainly presented a problem, and, like
work consisted mainly of piloting and thus he was concerned                            Mr. Robson, he would welcome any contributions towards its
with the more practical side of the problem of wheels and                              solution which might be made in the discussion.
brakes, but he had been very interested in Mr. Conway’s sug-
gestion of the possibility at some future date of aircraft alighting                      Mr. T. E. BEACHAM,      B.Sc. (Eng.), M.I.Mech.E., dealing
gear disappearing altogether except for one skid which might                           with the paper by Mr. Parker, said that the fundamental weight
be used on some type of special surface, perhaps combined with                         advantages to be gained by increasing the oil pressure were due
an arrester gear. He could not help wondering what, in that case,                      firstly to the actual reduction in the volume of liquid in the
was to happen in the event of forced or involuntary landings,                          system and secondly to the fact that it was possible to use smaller
because naturally it would not be possible to put down expensive                       suction pipes. The possible savings with these diminished pro-
equipment of the type suggested in all those parts of the world                        gressively with increase of pressure, and at the pressure used
in which aircraft were operating, and if some kind of emergency                        at present on aircraft the margin of saving was somewhat small.
equipment was provided one would still be faced with the                               Thick cylinder stresses were an argument often put forward
problem of weight.                                                                     against higher pressures, and the author did not mention that
   Mr. Robson had referred to the very vexed problem of fric-                          subject. He did not know whether the author had ways of getting
tional material, which was obviously one in which brake manu-                          over the thick cylinder stress difficulty. i t seemed to him that
facturers were greatly interested. The high-temperature rises                          the case for increasing the present pressure largely depended on
which took place, especially on the heavier aircraft and aircraft                      detail design, and particularly on the practical point as to
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
294                D I S C U S S I O N O N A I R C R A F T A U X I L I A R Y SYSTEMS A N D E Q U I P M E N T
whether-the components on the pressure side being smaller                              choosing a fluid, and one was that it should not be toxic. Un-
and thicker-the designer could make better use of existing                             fortunately, the effects of inhaling fairly large quantities of the
materials, in spite of the thick cylinder effects.                                     castor based fluids were far more unpleasant than might be
    The author’s views on pressure were certainly in line with                         expected from the nature of the base.
industrial hydraulic practice, where pressures rather higher than                         The author’s choice of steel pipes was, he thought, a good
the author advocated were in common use; but those pressures                           one, but the remarks on the flared type of joint might be too
had been developed over a long period of rime, and had probably                        definite. Personally, he would not rule out the possibility of
gone up to their present value by trial and error. If they were                        adapting the simple flared type of joint to higher pressures and
found useful in industriai work, it seemed to be an argument in                        larger sizes than the present standards. Investigations into this,
favour of using higher pressures for aircraft hydraulics.                              which appeared quite promising, were now actually proceeding
    The question of turbulence in the pipes might be important.                        at the Royal Aircraft Establishment.
If it was possible by shorter pipes or thinner fluids to increase                         The subject of seals was very controversial. The author sug-
flow velocities into the turbulent region the higher pressure                          gested that passage of the fluid might be allowed, but it must
would have an additional advantage, because of the changed                             not be such that it might be termed a leak. Later in the paper,
flow characteristics. For streamline flow the pipe velocity for                        however, it was suggested that provision should be made for
constant power and the same percentage pressure loss was in-                           returning that leak to the low-pressure side of the system. He
dependent of the pressure, whereas for turbulent flow under the                        thought that liquid seals should avoid any special means for
same conditions the velocity increased at higher pressures.                            returning the fluid to the header tank. The permanent leak might
    Another point about increased pressure was that it would                           not be inconvenient in some cases, but it might be in others.
affect the types of pump available. Rotary pumps and piston
 pumps with rotary valves were rather at the end of their tether                          Mr. R. BOORMAN,      A.M.I.Mech.E., said that he could not
 so far as pressure was concerned, whereas the piston pumps with                       attend any discussion on undercarriages and associated equip-
 seated valves had a good margin in hand and could probably be                         ment without feeling strongly that whether it was electrical,
used up to l0,OOO lb. per sq. in., and at all events up to higher                      aeronautical, or mechanical engineering, the aim of the engineer
pressures than were ever likely to be practicable in the rest of                       should be simplicity, and therefore he would like to ask why all
the system.                                                                            the difficulties of undercarriage retraction, servicing, and main-
    Reference was made in the paper to the lodging of dirt                             tenance should not be overcome by dispensing with the under-
 particles in the clearances of piston valves. He had had occasion                     carriage entirely.
 to examine that effect recently on a s m a l l hydraulic system work-                    Mr. Conway, in his opening remarks, had visualized in the
 ing up to 6,000 lb. per sq. in. The installation was fitted with a                    future a skid type of undercarriage landing on a prepared run-
 filter and the oil was kept very clean, and yet there was enough                      way. Personally, he would submit that that type of undercarriage
 dirt left in the system to block up these clearances, although it                     already existed in the flying boat, the skid being the keel and the
 took an hour to do it. As soon as the valve was moved in the                          world’s waterways the specially prepared landing grounds. For
 slightest degree the dirt dispersed, and then took an hour to                         large aircraft, he thought that that was the ultimate under-
 build up again. He thought that serious friction from that cause                      carriage. It would overcome the difficulty raised by Air Commo-
 could be avoided by polishing the surfaces and keeping the oil                        dore Oliver, who pointed out the absence of specially prepared
 as clean as possible.                                                                 runways in the case of a forced landing.
   Mr. E. R. STABLES,   B.Sc. (Eng.), A.M.I.Mech.E., who con-                              Mr. R. A. ROBBINS,   A.M.I.Mech.E., said that he did not pro-
fined his remarks to the paper by Mr. Parker, said it was of                            pose to comment on the subject matter of the papers except in
particular interest to him, because it provoked thought on the                          the particular field in which he had perhaps had some special
subject of hydraulic developments, which was certainly required                         experience, namely, the prevention of leakage of fluids between
at the present time, especially in view of the competition which                        fixed and moving parts. In that connexion, he would join issue
hydraulics were having from one or two firms specializing in                            with the statement in Mr. Conway’s paper That the theory of
pneumatics. And, of course, the electrical engineers were                               seals was now fully understood. Personally, he thought that that
developing electro-mechanical counterparts of hydraulic and                             was a very rash statement indeed. Undoubtedly great advances
pneumatic equipment, so that a healthy state of competition                             had been made and much work had been done, particularly in
existed, and he thought that it would be very unwise at the                             the field of design application, together with much ad hoc testing
present time to concentrate on any one method at the expense of                         on a multitudinous variety of shapes and materials for seals, but
the others. Each one had its advantages and disadvantages, and                          in his opinion much was still lacking in the store of knowledge
aircraft design was not yet so stabilized that any one best method                      on the fundamental and academic side of the mechanics of
could be chosen to do a given job on a given class of aircraft.                         sealing.
Much time had been spent in arguing electrics versus hydraulics,                           Long-term research ab initio into this subject was begun under
but he thought that that argument was fundamentally unsound.                            the auspices of the Ministry of Aircraft Production (now the
   The present hydfaulic systems on aircraft had been stabilized                        Ministry of Supply) and the Hydraulics Committee of the
for a few years, because at the beginning of the war representa-                         Society of British Aircraft Constructors, Ltd., at the Engineering
tives of the industry and of the Ministry of Aircraft Production                        Department of the Imperial College under Dr. White and Mr.
conferred together and agreed on a common basis for design.                             Denman. 4    , preliminary report had been published about
Working pressuresJ fluids, pipe lines, and pipe cornexions were                         eighteen months ago, showing that an excellent beginning had
standardized, and there was no doubt, he thought, that the Royal                        been made, and he understood that an interim report was now
Air Force benefited as a result ;but the time was now ripe for a                        about to be published. He was also glad to say that it seemed
step forward and to find ways and means of improving the                                 that there was a possibility, due to recent meetings between
equipment which had been in use since 1940. Reduction in the                             representative bodies and the Department of Scientific and
quantity of 5uid carried, reduction in the size and length of pipe,                      Industrial Research, of the work being continued over a longer
the development of a non-in5ammable or a low-inflammability                              term. He felt sure that not only the designers of seals them-
5uid, were all obvious lines for research and development, and                           selves but also those engineers who had the task of their appli-
high pressure seemed to be a way of achieving the first two of                           cation to actual equipment would derive great benefit from a
those objectives. When Mr. Parker said that they were at the                             clearer understanding of the mechanical and physical behaviour
cross-roads, personally he thought that the hydraulic specialists                        of the types of material now generally accepted for the manu-
should explore the high-pressure path. The advantages seemed                             facture of seals. This work might also lead to the adoption of
obvious and the disadvantages not so obvious, and in those                               new and untried materials, so many of which had recently
circumstances it seemed clearly desirable to go ahead and explore                        become available due to technical progress.
high-pressure development.                                                                  Mr. Parker had given a very able summing up of the present
   There were one or two details in the paper to which he would                          position regarding sealing higher pressures in aircraft appli-
like to refer. With regard to fluids, there were, of course, factors                     cations, and his solution of accepting a small and definite leak
other than viscosity and volatility which were important in                              at high pressures and sealing this off at lower pressures warranted
                                           Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                  D I S C U S S I O N O N AIRCRAFT A U X I L I A R Y SYSTEMS A N D E Q U I P M E N T                                                 295
the closest investigation and offered a very useful contribution                      available during the landing run was much smaller. The result
to what was a very difficult subject, although it might be con-                       was that weight had to be added to the undercarriage to deal
sidered rather a heresy in some quarters.                                             with loads which served no useful purpose. I t was therefore
                                                                                      very desirable that the difference between the torque figures
   Mr. E. NICOLL    (Cheltenham) said he would like to discuss one                    should be minimized.
or two of the points raised by Mr. Conway. On the question of
the weights of liquid springs, while he agreed that at present                           Mr. F. H. TOWER,M.I.Mech.E., said he wished to deal
they were somewhat heavier than oleo-pneumatic units it was                           more particularly with the paper by Mr. Parker, and there he
nevertheless true that only a small percentage of the under-                          was inclined to object to the word “ultra” in the title. When he
camage weight was represented by the shock absorber, and                              saw this title he thought he was going to find something wonder-
therefore the total penalty on the undercarriage was very small.                      ful, and when he discovered that “ultra high pressure’’ referred
In addition, liquid springs were comparatively new, and they                          merely to pressures of 3,000-5,000 lb. per sq. in. he was a little
had been concentrating up to now on reliability, without ex-                          disappointed, because on the ground, in press hydraulics, it was
ploring the various possibilities of weight reduction such as the                     quite normal to use a maximum pressure of 7,000 lb. per sq. in.,
pre-stressing of cylinders and the development of a fluid having                      and they frequently used high-speed pumps for testing vessels to
a higher compressibility.                                                             between 10,000 and 15,000 lb. per sq. in. In ground hydraulics
    In connexion with the calculation of undercarriage perform-                       they would to-day use the word “ultra” only for pressures ex-
ance, he would like to pay tribute to the pioneer work of Jones                       ceeding 20,000 lb. per sq. in.
and Cook at the Royal Aircraft Establishment, carried out some                           He hoped that it might be useful to mention ground
time before the war. Under present conditions the design of                           hydraulics, because he knew very little of the aircraft counter-
undercarriages for military aircraft was influenced to a very                         part ; but there were one or two differences which might be of
large extent by stowage problems and by the very thin wings                           interest. For instance, on the ground they used horse-powers of
now in use, and these in many instances determined the geo-                           5-150, but almost always above 5 h.p., although going up to
metry of the undercarriage to a surprising extent. It was easy                        many hundreds on certain big hydraulic presses. The system
to understand, therefore, that the urge to eliminate the under-                       had to have a fairly high efficiency in order to avoid heating up,
carriage completely, or at least to simplify it by reducing it to a                   because with, say, 150 h.p., even if only 10 per cent were con-
skid, should be very strong, and he believed that experiments                         verted to heat it meant that 15 h.p. was turning into heat all the
 on those lines were going ahead on specialized runways.                              time, and if there was an ambient temperature of 70-80 deg. F.
    With regard to the stressing of undercarriages, Mr. Conway                        one could soon get up to high temperatures. The temperature
 had omitted a very serious case which had been recently added                        range on the ground was usually between 70 and 120 deg. F.
to the civil requirements, namely, that represented by a swing in                     They never tried to go above 150 deg. F., and on almost any
the aircraft’s course at high speed. On certain types of under-                       normal job there would not be a temperature rise above 50
 carriages that was definitely the ruling case.                                       deg. F., or, say, 28 deg. C., as against the figure mentioned by
    On the subject of hydraulics, he was rather surprised to find                      Mr. Parker of 120 deg. C. (248 deg. F.). Of course, aircraft had
 Mr. Parker suggesting that reservoir capacity might be deter-                        the advantage in the sense that they often operated below
 mined by the cooling requirements for the pump. He would                             freezing point, and at high altitudes aircraft could quite safely,
 have thought that with a high efficiency pump running un-                            he presumed, convert all the horse-power of their small pump
 loaded, except when operating a service reservoir, capacity                          into heat; because he assumed that there were few aircraft
 should not be influenced at all by cooling requirements; in fact,                     pumps which.exceeded about 5 h.p. On the ground, however, on
 the reservoir should be made just large enough to accommodate                         a comparatively small system they could not continuously con-
 the change in volume represented by the piston rods with a                            vert more than about 1 h.p. into heat without getting into
 small reserve to allow for errors in filling, etc.                                    trouble.
    With regard to the suggestion for a high-pressure jack, Mr.                           The viscosity of the oil which they used was somewhere
 Parker had referred to the question of bursting pressures on                          between 40 and 70 seconds Redwood, which meant between 6
 cylinders, but, since the author was visualizing the use of com-                      and 16 centistokes, whereas he gathered that in aircraft it was
 paratively thin tubes for piston rods, it would be of interest to                     something like 5W1,OOO centistokes, or 1,800-3,600 seconds
 know whether any difficulty had arisen with the problem of                            Redwood. He could only presume that the oil became as thick
 crushing under external pressure. He, himself, had met that                           as that in the pipes which were exposed, because he could not
 problem on low-pressure systems of the order of 800 lb. per sq.                       imagine that the aircraft pump would operate very satisfactorily
 in., and he had come across it recently on jacks having rather                        at such figures and he would expect cavitation to occur.
 large piston rods.                                                                       He was very interested in the apparent demand for higher
    The reliability of the A.G.S. type of joint had also been men-                     pressures in aircraft. There might be several difficulties-
 tioned which, if well made, was very dependable, but experience                       possible one being what was termed hydraulic lock; i.e. the
 during the war indicated that a great deal of trouble arose                           spindles of the valves might lock. The author had suggested that
 through incorrect finishing of the joint, and personally he                           that might be due to the wedging of impurities in the clearance
 thought that something which was more foolproof was desirable.                        between the valve spindle and the bore, and that view had been
     On the question of gland leakage, they had done a lot of work                     confirmed by Mr. Beacham, but personally he did not think
 on glands for liquid springs at very high pressures, and there                        that that was so. His firm had made a few experiments-in a very
 they had got down to a negligible rate of leakage, measured not                       rough and ready way, as one did in a works-and their impres-
 by collecting the leak but by the fact that the cylinder remained                     sion was that hydraulic lock was a function of time and pressure.
 full after a large number of operations. That was a technique                         A valve, for instance, might never lock at 2,000 lb. per sq. in.,
 which was perhaps not applicable to the ordinary testing of                           but if pushed up to 5,000 lb. per sq. in. it would lock. Similarly,
 hydraulic jacks. While they had not tried to use this gland on                        the same valve would lock after 5 seconds in one position subject
 ordinary jacks, there was no reason why it should not be done,                        to 5,000 lb. per sq. in. pressure, but it would not lock and would
 if the use of more normal glands was unsatisfactory at the                            be quite easy to move if moved after a shorter period, say, in
 higher pressures, and, while the specialized type of jack which                       3 seconds.
  hh. Parker suggested, with the control valve, did make it                               Another interesting point was that if a valve was locked and
  possible to overcome the leak problem very simply, there might                       one took the pressure off and left it for, say, a minute or 2
  be arguments against that combination, in which case one would                       minutes, it would unlock. HIS theory of the hydraulic lock-it
  be forced back to eliminating the leak.                                              was pure theory, and he could not prove it-was that the spindle
     The only point which he had to raise on h4r.Robson’s paper                        was not concentrically stable within the bore. The body was
  was that of the variation of brake torque from the point of view                     undoubtedly distorted when pressure was applied, and in any
  of the undercarriage designer. At present the brake designer                         case the clearance was only about one-twentieth of the thick-
  had to deel with a very high torque which was developed only                         ness of a human hair. He thought, therefore, that the spindle-
  for a short perid, this torque being much greater than was                           and this explained the time element-by distortion or for any
  required for operating purposes, because the steady torque                           other reason, was moved against one side, and the pressure got
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
296                DISCUSSION ON AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS AND E Q U I P M E N T
down one side and forced the spindle over (Fig. 36). Lock could                       seemed to him, speaking purely as a layman, that the proper
occur when there was almost no flow, so that it did not seem                          solution was to use air brakes, a reversible-blade propeller, wing
likely that impurities could get in, and, even if they did, if they                   flaps and brake flaps, and, if it were practicable, to alter the
were the size of one-twentieth of a human hair it did not seem                        incidence of the main plane or of both planes. It might be
that they would have a serious effect. He thought that the                            possible to do this hydraulically.
pressure pushed the spindle into metallic contact, and then, if
the pressure was taken off, the oil film would be gradually                               Mr. GEORGE   ORLOFF,   A.lM.I.Mech.E., said that with reference
restored and the spindle would become free again. It certainly                         to Mr. Conway’s statement regarding the optimum position of
seemed, as far as they had gone, that there was a time and                             torque links, in his own experience it had sometimes been found
pressure element, but he thought that the subject was one on                           that the use of two pairs of links not only stiffened the under-
which more research should be done. He had not seen any                                carriage but also allowed the use of a smaller overlap between
research on the subject, but he imagined :hat there must have                          the sliding tube bearings. This was due to the fact that two
been some, and he hoped that it would be brought forward so                            landing cases were usually considered, one of them being a
that it could be studied; because he believed that hydraulic lock                      landing tail up with drag and the other a three-point landing
might be a serious difficulty in going to higher pressures.                            without drag. It happened, therefore, that the optimum position
                                                                                       of toggles for the first case rnigh: cause unacceptable friction in
                                                                                      the second case, while the use of two pairs of toggles often
                                                                                      allowed an acceptable compromise. The polar nomogram shown
                                                                                      in Fig. 3 seemed to have been designed for the latter solution,
                                                                                      since no account was taken of the torque reaction in the toggles.
                                                                                         While still on the subject of undercarriages, it might be of
                                                        CLEARANCE                     interest to mention the findings of some recent experiments
                                                         0.0001 IN
                                                                                      they had made which had shown that even shock absorbers
                                                                                      of the type shown in Fig. 12, VI, were apt to cavitate during
                                                                                      recoil, and 011subsequent landings showed evidence of cavitation
                                                                                      when the recoil orifice area was small compared with the
                                                                                      effective area of clearance at the counter-piston. In other words,
                                                                                      some of the fluid trapped between the diaphragm and the
                                                                                      counter-piston seemed to surge out into the air space.
                                                                                         It was very interesting to hear Mr. Parker’s views on moving
                                                                                      hydraulic packings, which seemed to be in agreement with their
                                                                                      own experience. I n that connexion, corroborative evidence was
  Fig. 36. Diagram Illustrating Lack of Concentric Stability                          found in all types of components, but particularly in systems
                 between Spindle and Bore                                             with pressures ranging from 5,000 to 65,000 lb. per sq. in.
                                                                                      Some experiments had been carried out within that range of
    The success or failure of most hydraulic equipment was often                      pressure which showed that whilst static packings were capable
 determined by the pipes, joints, rind seals. So far as the pipes                     of withstanding such high pressures over several days without
 were concerned, he thought that in all probability stecl pipes                       any leakage whatever, when moving they would operate satis-
 were the most likely to prove effective, and it was possible to go                   factorily only by allowing a very slight amount of fluid to be
 up to very much higher pressures on the pipes as pipes. Where                        deposited over the swept surface at each reversal. When the
 they failed was where they were tied to the joint ; and further                      length of packing was increased sufficiently to prevent this lubri-
 progress must be made in developing an improved joint. He                            cation, deterioration mainly at -he heel of the packing was
thought that there might be a chance of improving the flared                          evident after a few cycles of operation, and the resulting short
 joint. With regard to seals, he fully agreed with Mr. Parker that                    life of the packing was evidently unacceptable.
 it was necessary to have a leaking seal for it to be effective and                      O n the whole, very little information was available on glands
 successful. One of the biggest troubles which they had with seals                    and packings of all types, but he would like to suggest that even
was the shaft seal, where there was a rotating surface. The reason                    more formidable problems would arise in the dynamic cases.
for this trouble was that it ran dry and wore a groove in the shaft                   They had found, for instance, that on drop testing of landmg
or wore away the seal.                                                                gear the sliding tubes, or the tubes that passed the packings,
    It was necessary, therefore, to have a seal which leaked to                       always seemed to be wetter than in slowly moving jacks.
provide a little lubrication and yet seal. He thought that the                           With regard to the point that Mr. Towler made about rings
 most likely development in that direction was to have a combina-                     in rotation, they had also made experiments on rotating rubber
tion in sequence of metal piston rings and synthetic rubber                           rings, but these seemed to behave better than reciprocating
rings-the rubber rings to take up the slack oil and not being                         rings, and, though it was quite correct to state that wear was
subjected to such a high pressure. The difficulty was that a                          evident where the shaft was in contact with the gland, at the
seal which was good for a high pressure was not so good, being                        same time the life of the gland seemed to be a little longer than
too stiff, for a low pressure, while a soft seal was good for the                     in the reciprocating seal under similar conditions. A good deal
low pressure but extruded at a high pressure. It was therefore                        of heat was generated during operation, and this tended to
desirable to have a combination of the two, particularly when                         shorten the life of the gland.
going up to very high pressures such as 7,000 lb. per sq. in. It
was asking too much of one seal to cover a pressure drop from                           Mr. C. B. V. NEILSON      (Warrington) said he would like to
7,000 lb. per sq. in. to atmosphere. A combination of the two,                       make one or two comments on Mr. Conway’s paper-one being
however, cost almost nothing in the way of weight or material                        in connexion with the shock absorber illustrated in Fig. 13. This
and was quite practicable. For small spindles, of course, it was                     shock absorber could only be used in a horizontal or inclined
best to have no seal whatever; the best packing was no packing.                      position, if great care was taken both in the design and i n the
    Mr. Conway had suggested that a liquid might be used in                          maintenance filling routine, to avoid the possibility of air pockets
some way like liquid rubber which would have hydrostatic                             forming on the fluid side of the counter-piston when the shock
properties for use on undercarriage shock absorbers, and which                       absorber was serviced in the aircraft. Failing this, it would be
might prove easier to seal than oil; but even soft rubber would                      found that on filling the stack-pipe level and inflating in the
extrude at very low pressures, and he doubted whether it would                       usual way, the compression ratio was reduced, as the shock
be possible to obtain a liquid which would satisfy all the require-                  absorber was unable to retain its full design capacity of fluid.
ments. It was much safer to use a seal, and a liquid better suited                     Another comment was that all the shock absorbers discussed
for the hydrostatic function.                                                        were of high efficiency only at a certain rate of closure, normally
    Having read Mr. Robson’s paper, he could see a large number                      that corresponding to the maximum required for vertical
of snags about the wheel brake, which might swing one all                            velocity of descent. I n the case of the sudden application of
round the aerodrome just as one was landing or taking off. It                        brakes on a tricycle undercarriage, the energy to be absorbed by
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                  D I S C U S S I O N O N AIRCRAFT A U X I L I A R Y SYSTEMS AND E Q U I P M E N T                                                   297
the nose-wheel shock absorber when arresting the pitch of the                          materials had given rather more stable frictions than the inter-
aircraft was comparable with the maximum landing energy,                               mediate type, and they had also been produced with about two
while the rate of closure was very much less than that in the                          and a half times the wear resistance, which was felt to be a
landing case. Under such conditions the efficiency of the types                        reasonable achievement.
of oleo-pneumatic shock absorbers described was taken in                                  As far the future, he thought that the latest type of material
Ministry of Supply and Aeronautics Research Board design                               had great scope for development. It had a competitor in the
formulae as 33 per cent, and this led to a maximum reaction                            form of the sintered metal linings which had been evolved in
which had to be allowed for which might exceed that in the                             the U.S.A. He thought that those had certain disadvantages;
landing case, and be a critical factor affecting the design of the                     they did not take kindly to being made in curved form, and their
nose undercarriage and the nose of the aircraft. One solution of                       frictions were generally lower and they were very tricky in
that problem was based on a spring-loaded closure damping                              manufacture.
orifice, so arranged that the shock absorber had a high efficiency
at all rates of closure.                                                                  Mr. A. L. ADAMS(Wolverhampton) referred to a type of
                                                                                       shock absorber unit in which the spring extended from the wheel
    Mr. E. W. SISMAN(Cleckheaton) said that Mr. Robson had                             up to and across the aircraft and down to the other wheel, and
rightly pointed out that the aircraft brake had faced the friction                     also made the suggestion that on the fighter type of aircraft,
lining industry with one of its biggest problems. Temperatures                         where the consumption of fuel went up to 30-10 per cent of the
were very high, and it was necessary to contend to-day with                            all-up weight of the aircraft at take-off, it might be possible to
brake-operating temperatures on the surface of the drum during                         have two landing gears, one for taking off, to be jettisoned after
a stop of up to 1,500 deg. F., while at very small points the                          the aircraft had cleared the field, and the other fully retracted
temperatures instantaneously must be even higher. They had                             until the aircraft came in for landing at perhaps 60 per cent of
also to deal with very considerable mechanical stresses in the                         its take-off weight.
materials. Pressures on the expander tube brake ran up to                                 Mr. Robson had given a very good summary of the different
150 lb. per sq. in. or more, and on some of the new plate brakes                       types of brake, and personally he would like to give a summary
pressures were commonly thought of in terms of 500-600 lb.                             of the evolution of those brakes. He thought that in the first
per sq. in., and pressures of, 1,000 and 1,200 lb. per sq. in. were                    world war they had the best type of brake of any of them,
being considered.                                                                      namely, the full tail skid on the back end of the aeroplane, which
    Additionally, there was the problem, which did not arise                           might be said to be the first brake. Then people began to put tail
with most other forms of brake gear, of very considerable                              wheels on aircraft and found that they had to have brakes on the
mechanical strength being required in the materials, since they                        wheels, and naturally, therefore, the drum type of brake was
were virtually unsupported by any form of rigid metal brake                            evolved. At first the drum was put into the wheel and the wheel
shoe. Again, particularly in the expander tube brAe, and in a                          used as a heat reservoir, but that was found to have very bad
lesser degree in the plate brake, the materials must act as an                         effects on the tyres and the tubes, especially due to the heat,
insulator to prevent heat from the hot braking surface rcaching                        and so the drum was separated from the wheel.
the rubber air bag, or, in the case of the plate brake, the metal                         Then there came induced cooling, trying to force air flow over
parts which sheathed the oil columns.                                                  the drum to cool it off, and from that, one came to the brakes of
    If he might go back to the start of the use of undercarriage                       the disk or plate type, where the drum was exposed to the air
brakes on aircraft in the early 1930’s, the types of brake lining                      stream. In other words, the engineers were now finding out that
used then were very largely conditioned by having to meet the                          they could not put in a reservoir to absorb heat because of the
requirements of mechanical strength, and usually consisted of                          weight, and so they were trying to find a way to get the heat out
asbestos yams which were coiled much in the way a fishing line                         as best they could.
was wound on a reel; the whole was soaked with a phenol-
formaldehyde synthetic resin and heat treated to the rigid state.                         Mr. T. A. KIRKUP(Weybridge) said that there was no refer-
 Those materials were capable of standing considerable stress and                      ence in A h . Conway’s paper to gland friction, but they had
were. quite good insulators, and for the conditions of the day                         found that under certain conditions the gland friction could be
they had a reasonably high coefficient of friction, which began                        appreciable, and in the condition of least friction the gland
to fade at the higher temperatures, due to exudation of some of                        friction could be as much as the bearing friction. In the more
the chemical constituents of the material. That usually took                           normal condition of 0.4 drag the gland friction could be at least
place at a temperature of 400-450 deg. F., which was seldom                            50 per cent of the bearing friction. They had also found by
reached on the brakes of those days.                                                   plotting stroke as a percentage of the maximum available against
    Materials of that type did very good service right through                         angle of resultant load to leg for various cases, that if a was
 most of the 1939-45 war, until aircraft brake operating con-                          greater than 25-30 deg. trouble could be expected.
 ditions became such that better types were required. The                                 Mr. Conway also referred to the question of lead alloy and
 approach to that problem was to evolve a lining which was                             lead bronze bearing materials, and it would be interesting if he
 basically similar, but in which the amount of resin which con-                        could give some figures. They had carried out a number of tests
 tained the constituent likely to exude was reduced. The earlier                       using light alloy cylinders and cast iron piston heads, and they
 types of lining were a half-and-half mixture of resin and asbestos ;                  had found that with a 14 deg. drag condition, using D.T.D.364
 on the newer ones the resin content came down to 25-30 per                            and cast iron piston head, after 30,000 cycles the cylinder wear
 cent, and, in addition to reducing the actual quantity of the                         was about 0.007 inch maximum, and on the cast iron head the
 resin, heat treatments were applied to the linings which brought                      wear was about 0.0026 inch. On another test, using D.T.D.363
 out much of the volatile constituents before the brake linings                        and cast iron, also after 30,000 cycles the cylinder wear was only
 went into service.                                                                    0.004 inch and the head wear in the cast iron head only 0.0005
    That produced a material which was in general use to-day,                          inch. If Mr. Conway could give some comparable figures it
 and which was functioning fairly well. The friction was lower                         would be appreciated.
 than with the original types, but much more stable, even up to                           A point which Mr. Conway did not mention was the absorp-
 the high temperature conditions of 1,400-1,500 deg. F. Due to                         tion of air by the oil. An article had been published in the Aero
 the heat treatment there had been some sacrifice of the wearing                       Digest for February 1945, which gave some almost incredible
 ability of that material, and this problem had been tackled by                        figures. Briefly, the formula was that 100 C.C. of oil could absorb
 using a moulded type of material which again contained an                             instantaneously 0 . 7 4 3 ~C.C. of air. That would mean that for a
 asbestos basis, this time in fibre form, with only the very                           pressure of 2,000 Ib. per sq. in. the amount of air absorbed by
 minimum amount of synthetic resin to give the necessary bond-                         the oil would be 1,486 C.C. per 100 C.C. of oil. That, to his mind,
 ing strength. The friction was further conditioned by the in-                         might have some bearing on whether one used an isothermal or
  clusion of a number of inorganic filling materials in the form of                    adiabatic air curve where there was a certain amount of oil
 inert dusts and metal chippings, the last being in some measure                       being discharged into the air chamber. Air chambers did dis-
 intended to break down the formation of any surface films due                         charge a certain amount, and they had always found that n = 1
  to the exudation of volatiles at high temperatures. Those newer                      or 1.1 gave the best results.
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
298                DISCUSSION O N AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS AND E Q U I P M E N T
   With regard to Mr. Robson’s paper, he would like to point                           of types of equipment for industrial purposes, and made it
out that with the introduction of jet type aircraft there was likely                   desirable to use high pressures. He would like to join issue with
to be an increase of 30 per cent in the ener-g to be absorbed by                       Mr. Parker on that point. That was true not only for the very
the brake units ;and with the reduction in size of engine nacelles                     large presses such as Mr. Towler mentioned, where it was not
in jet aircraft, and possibly with a thinner wing the braking                          possible to have rams of the incredible size which would be
problem would become even more difficult.                                              required with lower pressures, but even for certain kinds of
                                                                                       vehicle equipment and machine tools, for which pressures such
   Mr. R. HADEKEL    (London) dealing with Mr. Conway’s paper,                         as 3,000 Ib. per sq. in. would seem to be very useful.
remarked chat very little had been said about undercarriage costs.
An undercarriage at the moment cost appreciably more per                                 Mr. S. J. CLIFTON(De Havilland Aircraft Company) pointed
pound than the average airframe, and one could not help feeling                        out that there had been no mention of side forces in the paper
that that was not right as it was a component which was more                           by Mr. Conway when dealing with friction forces on a tele-
favourable inherently to quantity production and cheap methods                         scopic undercarriage although the effect of drag and the vertical
of manufacturc. The question was very largely bound up with                            reaction were discussed.
that of materials, and he felt that it was the duty of material
manufacturers to take more interest in such things as high tensile                         A~~C~~~~~~~~F.R.BANKS,C.B.,M.I.M~~~.E.,
weldable steels-a subject on which the Americans had done                             asked whether the authors could say why it bad taken so long
useful work-and also in some better light alloy casting materials.                    to popularize the tricycle undercarriage with the aircraft
If it were possible to have light alloys which really did give                        designers and manufacturers of this countq, because it was
something a little over 20 tons per sq. in. when cast it would                        better from every point of view than the tail-wheel type. It was
help a great deal towards producing cheaper undercarriages.                           safe in that there was less tendency to swing on take-off and it
   On Mr. Parker’s paper, he said he remembered going into the                        avoided “ground-looping’’ upon landing. In the latter case, and
 question of the theoretical effect of increase of pressure on                        with some of the mediocre civil aerodromes which still had to
weight in aircraft systems some time ago, and it seemed to him                        be used both in this country and elsewhere, it was possible to
that there were two factors involved. One was the question of                         land a machine with a tricycle undercarriage more safely when
manufacturing limitations and the second the question of com-                         the wind was in an unfavourable direction to the runway.
ponents as designed by theoretical considerations. With the                              He was, of course, well aware that future British aircraft
present 2,500 Ib. per sq. in. arrangements the system was just                        would have tricycle undercarriages, but he still felt that the
about over the manufacturing limitations which hampered the                           aircraft manufacturers of this country were at least three years
older 1,200 lb. per sq. in. systems considerably. The stage was                       late in adopting them.
being reached where components were really designed by load                              Could the authors give an indication of the saving in under-
considerations, and it could be shown that in those conditions                        carriage weight which could be expected due to the use of high-
the effect of increasing pressure on pipe weight was if anything                      duty materials and high-pressure systems? For instance, was it
slightly unfavourable. It certainly would be unlavourable as the                      going to be in the order of half of one per cent, one per cent,
pressure increased, taking pipes on the basis of the constant                         or even higher?
percentage power loss, because the pipes would be smaller and                            In regard to brakes; aircraft fitted with jet turbines would
thicker. The weight of jacks would definitely be greater with                         give these a harder time because there would be no reversing
higher pressures, again subject to manufacturing limitations not                      pitch propeller to help in the reduction of the braking load. But
coming into the picture, or any other secondary considerations.                       it was of course quite feasible to fit controllable deflectors at the
   There were also certain other minor effects, as for instance                       jet nozzles so as to direct the jet stream in a forward direction
the elastic energy of oil, which was responsible for the rather                       and secure some braking effect in this manner.
unpleasant jerks which one got when opening a valve. The                                 I n regard to the distortion of brake drums due to excessive
elastic energy per unit volume went up as the square of the                           heat ;he would ask whether any of the ceramics such as sintered
pressure. If it was assumed that the volume of oil was inversely                      aluminium oxide had been considered as refractories to prevent
proportional to the pressure, the elastic energy was still directly                   the heat from loading up the brake drum and wheel excessively,
proportional to the operating pressure, and the jerks which were                      or had such a material been thought of both as a refractory and
obtained tended to become more unpleasant. He did not know                            also as a braking surface in the brake drum or disk?
whether they did much harm, but they certainly could not do
any good.                                                                                 Mr. C. D. HOLLAND        (Cricklewood) dealing with Mr. Con-
   With reference to hydraulic systems generally, some remarks                         way’s paper, said he thought that more work ought to be done
had been made about the viscosity of oils, and he felt that that                       on the energy absorption of the tyres and the dynamic con-
was quite an imporrant subject. For instance, Mr. Towler                               ditions. Prediction and experience were not in good agreement.
mentioned oils which were used in high-power press equipment                           He thought that the real trouble was the fact that the shock
which were actually thinner than the aircraft oils. Personally,                        absorber was in series with the tyre, and that t h i s had not been
he often wondered whether those oils were not the result of the                        taken into account in detail before.
time when the low temperature conditions were a serious limita-                           With regard to the oleo-pneumatic shock absorber, from a
tion, and for shop use one must reckon with minimum tempera-                           psychological aspect he found it preferable to use a lower co-
tures of about 10 deg. C. or less, when oil thickened a good deal.                     efficient of efficiency (say, 70 or 74 per cent) instead of the 80 per
However, with the oils which were now available-not only for                           cent mentioned in the paper, and then one avoided adding the
aircraft but for industrial uses-which had a much flatter                              odd inch on for luck at the end.
characteristic, it was possible to use those with about twice the                         He was always suggesting that the nose wheel unit travel
viscosity of aircraft fluids over the normal room temperature                          should be greater than the main wheel travel. That recom-
range, which produced very good results. I n particular, they                          mendation appeared in many places, including official publi-
allowed the use of rotary pumps. Mr. Beacham said he thought                           cations. The main case for stressing the nose wheel from the
that rotary pumps were at The end of their tether, but there were                      energy point of view was the three-point landing, and in that
gear pumps working now at 3,000 Ib. per sq. in., and not on                            case the main wheel took 75 per cent of the energy. If there was
treacle either, and in his opinion it shodd be possible to design                      to be no charge i:i pitch of the aeroplane in t.he three-point
piston pumps with rotary valves to work up to 5,000 Ib. per sq.                        landing, then the two travels must be the same, whereas the case
in.,and even higher, by a suitable choice of material, particularly                    to determine the average for the main wheel was the two-poinr
because thermal expansion problems were one of the limiting                            landing, when oEe had 100 per cent in those shock absorbers.
considerations.                                                                        Therefore the main wheel travel should be greater than the nose
   With regard to loads on valves, he did not know whether it                          wheel travei ; but with the three-point ianding t h e total travels
was generally appreciated that the load on valves tended to                            should be the same.
decrease with increasipg pressure, again designing the valve for                          He agreed with Mr. Conway on the question of friction. He
constant percentage power loss conditions. The load on, and                            thought it was a factor which was very seldom appreciated that
size of, valves was quite an important matter in a large number                        friction in an oleo-pneumatic shock absorber was to a great
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                  D I S C U S S I O N ON AIRCRAFT A U X I L I A R Y S Y S T E M S AND E Q U I P M E N T                                               299
extent uncontrolled and was always acting against one, usually                        was a simple skid, saving perhaps 2-3 per cent of the aircraft
at the most inconvenient time.                                                        weight. The inconvenience of such arrangements from the
   He had been interested in the note that Breguet was the first                      point of view of handling the aircraft on the ground, and in
to use the oleo-pneumatic shock absorber. Personally, he had                          emergency landings-which would inevitably involve some, but
always understood that Sir Hiram Maxim used the simple oleo                           probably not serious, damage to the machine-had to be offset
absorber in 1888 or thereabouts. He did not think that the                            against the considerable increase in performance resulting from
machine flew, but Sir Hiram had it fitted with steel springs. He                      the weight saved. Probably a transatlantic air mail service would
found it very interesting to compare liquid springs with oleo-                        represent the easiest application of such an arrangement.
pneumatic shock absorbers, and, looking at the two designs, the                          Mr. Boorman quite properly suggested that the flying boat
liquid spring appeared to be simpler, had a lesser number of                          was already an undercarriage-less aircraft. This was not strictly
parts, and should be cheaper. Whether in fact it was he did not                       true since the hull had to be designed with a step, and to be of
know.                                                                                 a suitable section to allow fast taxi-ing with proper stability. So
   Another point was that for nose wheel units the liquid spring                      far it had not been possible to envisage a flying boat with
had springing characteristics which were very much more suit-                         performance in the supersonic region. Furthermore, for irans-
able. The oleo-pneumatic could be made to work, but was not                           continental flying the cost of providing adequate water or sea
so simple. He agreed that the liquid springs were heavier than                        bases, particularly inland, was enormous.
the normal oleo-pneumatic units, but, the increase in weight                             Mr. Robbins joined issue with him on the existing knowledge
was often less than was generally supposed; according to a recent                     on sealing technique. Perhaps he should have said that it was
comparison, it was only of the order of 10-15 per cent, and that                      the theory of leaks rather than the theory of seals which was
was where the oleo-pneumatic unit was a light one.                                    understood. It was true that relatively few engineers appeared
    He agreed that finish was important, and he thought that the                      to appreciate the fine points of sealing technique, but on the
figure given of 3-8 micro-inches was a little on the coarse side.                     other hand the evolution of the rectangular or circular section
 Weight was the permanent enemy of the aircraft designer, and,                        seal dated from two or three patent specifications in the period
although Mr. Conway had used illustrations of the single-wheel                         1935-8; the important point in these inventions was that the
units, the twin-wheel unit was often 10-20 per cent lighter.                          seal was subjected to initial radial stress, and was put in hydro-
    He would like to make a general note which covered shock                          static stress by the fluid pressure. Earlier inventions were con-
 absorbers and hydraulic mechanisms in general. He thought that                       cerned with special shapes and sections most of which did not
 many of the reported defects were due not so much to poor                            appear to be in any way effective. It was contended that the
 design and manufacture as to faulty assembly, indifferent instal-                    technique of sealing two parts, whether statically or dynami-
 lation, and excessive maintenance.                                                   cally, was developed to the stage where a guaranteed design
    Turning to Mr. Parker’s paper, he felt sure that the 40 per                       could be evolved without any difficulty, with the one important
 cent efficiency of the jack given in the curve in that paper could                   qualification that the life of such seals was relatively limited,
 be doubled with a change in mechanism. At these higher pres-                         although usually adequate on an aircraft.
 sures the question of viscosity had already been mentioned, but                          He was M y aware of the excellent work done by Mr. White
 the point which he wished to make was the change in viscosity                         and Mr. Denman at the Imperial College. The preliminary re-
 with pressure. Some very useful work had been done at the                             port published some eighteen months ago merely confirmed
 National Physical Laboratory on that subject, and the report                          what the specialist designers of rectangular seals already knew,
 on it showed that at 5,000 lb. per sq. in. the viscosity had been                     but the methods used were interesting and ingenious.
 doubled. That was a point which should be taken into account                             It was quite true, as Mr. Nicholl pointed out, that the extra
 when looking into pipe sizes. When the working pressure went                          weight of a spring was negligible in terms of the total under-
 up it was necessary to know a little more about the bulk modulus,                     carriage weight. It was also true that the new swing stressing
 especially with some of the new fluids which were coming into                         case might be critical for the stressing of some undercarriages.
use.                                                                                   The cases given in the paper were correct at the time of writing,
   Sealing had been discussed by a number of speakers, and a                           but additional side load strength might now be required. While
point there was that the surface finish was going to be a very                         the cases in the paper were given for the purposes of initial
great factor.                                                                          design, it was obvious that all the appropriate or official cases
   In the past they had not been very keen on the method of                            would have to be considered in a complete design study.
emergency operation with a cartridge, but it looked as though                             In reply to Mr. Orloff, he thought that the stiffness of twin-
they would be forced to use something like it to-day, with the                         torque links or toggles was unlikely to be sufficient to make any
higher pressures which were coming in.                                                 appreciable difference to the telescopic friction, but such dupli-
   He had given a good deal of thought to the differential                             cation was good practice for purely mechanical reasons to reduce
operated jack, and the one conclusion to which he had come was                         wear, etc.
that if there was a leak or a pipe failure there was a very grave                         Insufficient attention was paid to cavitation of the type men-
danger of an unwanted movement of the jack, and in some cases,                         tioned when designing shock absorbers, but on the other hand
in some important mechanisms, that might be very disastrous.                           there was no information at all on the practical results, or even
That was particularly the case where there was stored energy.                          the existence of it, on the actual aircraft.
   Mr. Robson had done good work in giving the curves shown                               Replying to Mr. Neilson, the unit shown in Fig. 13 would
in Figs. 26-29. Personally, he had been telling people that they                       normally be partially removed from the aircraft so that it could
could not have more than 0.3 braking, but he had arrived at                            be filled vertically-   poor feature.
that from a slightly different point of view. In the case of the                          He did not agree with the remarks that a shock absorber
nose wheel the position was that if the brakes were applied the                        efficiency was high only at a specified velocity. I n his experience
reaction was transferred to the nose wheel, and in doing so one                        it was maintained sensibly at reduced velocities, although the
relieved the reaction on the main wheel and therefore the                              tyre effect became greater. He did agree, however, that the nose-
braking went down. If one could not get a figure of more than                          wheel shock absorber had a much more difficult task to perform
0 . 4 ~with the tyre to the ground, there would then be a reduc-                       than the main units; in the case of certain aircrdt the ratio of
tion to about 75 per cent of that, which was only 0-3,so that                          dynamic to static load was as high as 10, and the regulation and
was the figure arrived at both in theory and in practice.                              inflation of the shock absorber was excessively critical. Sufficient
                                                                                       experience was lacking in this country to date to be able to be
   Mr. H. G. CONWAY     said in reply to Air Commodore Oliver                          dogmatic about such units.
that there was no doubt that some appreciable advantage would                             It was understood that an American aircraft with two sets of
be gained on a modem aircraft by dispensing with the under-                            undercarriages, on the lines suggested by Mr. Adams, had
carriage altogether, which was 5-59 per cent of the aircraft                           actually been built. It seemed at first consideration to be an
weight. It was quite possible to evolve an aircraft, completely                        absurd proposal, and more logical to allow overloading of the
devoid of an undercarriage, which would land on some sort of                           smaller unit.
flexible and elastic surface, although the capital cost of these                          Mr. IGrkup reminded him of several points he had not men-
special aerodromes would be great. An alternative compromise                           tioned in the paper. As to gland friction, with proper design this
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
300                D I S C U S S I O N O N A I R C R A F T A U X I L I A R Y S Y S T E M S AND E Q U I P M E N T
should not exceed 2-3 per cent; the lower value had been                              but that it was necessary to strike a balance between this
confirmed by actual test on shock absorbers. I n his experience,                      particular objection and other features.
gland friction had always been ignored, in comparison with the                           He thought that Mr. Stables may have mistaken his own
greater bush friction.                                                                remarks on the A.G.S. joint. What he had said was that this
   He regretted he could give Mr. Kirkup no quantitative results                      joint in its present form was not suitable for higher pressures.
of wear on bearings ;he had always found it to be negligible on                       He did not exclude the possibility of making it suitable by
the aircraft. He would call Mr. Kirkup’s figures small for the                        modifications, but the result would involve considerable change
average unit.                                                                         of drawings.
   T h e question of the solubility of air in oil, at high pressure,                     His remarks on seals were not inconsistent. He had pointed
was an important one about which little appeared to be known.                         out that a seal to be successful must permit enough seepage to
On the other hand the p.v. index of 1.1 was thought to be too                         lubricate itself and insufficient to cause a leak. Further, he
low, as his experience had confirmed the value of 1.3 recom-                          suggested that this became progressively more difficult to
mended by the Royal Aircraft Establishment.                                           arrange with increase of pressure, and, as a prmciple, an in-
   He did not agree with Mr. Hadekel that undercarriages cost                         acceptably large leak might be necessary to achieve lubrication,
appreciably more than the selling price of aircraft as a whole                        in which case the leak would have to be dealt with by some
(some 30-40s. per pound at present). They obviously cost                              method of which he had given one example.
more than the simple unequipped airframe proper. During the                              He welcomed Mr. Robbins’s reference to the need for research
war, undercarriages were being made in quantity for something                         investigation into the mechanical and physical behaviour of seals,
nearer 10s. per pound; the difficulty to-day was that the quanti-                     and agreed that much benefit would be derived from a clearer
ties were small. It was quite true that high tensile steel and light                  scientific understanding of what were far too often no more than
alloy castings were very expensive.                                                   ad hoc experiments.
   Replying to Mr. Clifton, the friction calculation shown in the                         He would agree with Mr. Nicoll that in many hydraulic
paper used a drag lo3d only without side load, because it was                         systems in the past a reservoir capacity had been determined by
felt that adequate comparative data could be obtained with this                       the considerations mentioned. On the other hand, it was reason-
simple method. As explained in the paper, comparative data as                         ably certain that the hydraulic system when applied to flying
a guide to engineering judgement was all that could be expected.                      controls would be generating pressure for a much greater pro-
There were far too many variables for absolute truth to be                            portion of normal flight, and he felt therefore that the question
sought. The method given enabled an experienced designer to                           of heat capacity would arise. H e understood that there was at
compare a new design with an earlier one already in operation.                        least one installation in which a cooler had been seriously
A similar comparison could be made with a combined side and                           considered or actually installed.
drag load with some increase in complication of process, but                              With regard to the problem of crushing of piston rods, he had
probably little practical advantage.                                                  expericnced it on one occasion, when the possibility of its
   While not wishing to enter into a controversy with Air Com-                        occurrence had been overlooked. Once experienced, however,
modore Banks on the relative rnerits of tail-wheel or nose-wheel                      it was not likely to be overlooked again, nor did he think that
undercarriage layouts, it was fair to point out that had many                         in the great majority of instances that it would be a critical
British aircraft been fitted with tricycle undercarriages during                      stressing case. He would agree, however, that the problem was
the recent war less bombs would have been dropped on the                              most likely to be encountered with large piston rods rather than
enemy.                                                                                 smaller equipment designed to work at higher pressures.
   Whether it w3s more correct to use an appropriate shock                                In reply to Mr. Towler, he must again point out that his paper
absorber efficiency and then add an inch of travel “for luck”, or                     referred to pressures in relation to light hydraulic systems,
to use a lower efficiency, was a matter of opinion. Mr. Holland’s                     having to provide a high stroke/bore ratio in the operating
proposal was probably the more correct.                                               cylinders. The dictionary definition of the word “ultra” could
   In his opinion extra travel was needed on a nose-wheel to                          be “excessive” and to this extent Mr. Towler’s remarks were
allow for some degree of ignorance of the applied forces, and to                      accurate since the figures he had quoted were excessive for the
cater for mal-adjustment, leakage of air, oil, etc.                                   purpose covered by the paper.
   As regards surface finish, in spite of modern production                               Regarding heating, he would point out that the temperature
technique a finish better than 5-8 micro-inches was hardly                            ranges quoted covered not only the working range in flight, but
practicable, and even if obtainable, hardly likely to stay so fine                     also temperatures that might be experienced before operating
for long.                                                                             the system. In most high altitude aircraft systems some parts
                                                                                      worked in a quite small temperature range during flight, but the
   Mr. S. M. PARKER      said in reply to Mr. Beacham that he                         temperature of other parts was often approximately that of
agreed that n;uch of the weigh‘; saving in using higher pressures                     the surrounding atmosphere, which varied between wide limits
came from reduction in volume of fluid and size of pipes, but                         on a single flight.
there were other factors which had been mentioned in the paper.                           The temperatures that had been quoted in the paper were,
I n any case the total was comparatively small, but for aircraft                      he felt, reasonably accurate. The output of most hydraulic
purposes was valuable.                                                                pumps in modern systems was between 5 and 10 h.p. and the
   The question of thick cylinder stresses should certainly not                        conversion efficiency at peak pressure was over 90 per cent.
be overlooked. The increase of stress was, he believed, of the                            As regards the viscosity of oil, Mr. Towler had confused
order of 10 per cent, when the diameter thickness ratio was 5.                         normal working viscosity with the figure quoted for the extreme
I n practice, so small a ratio w2s seldom approached and the                           viscosity beyond which the system would not work even tem-
increase in weight from this cause would be very small indeed.                         porarily, permitting cavitation and other undesirable effects.
   He would like to refer to the question of working pressure in                       Between 70 and 120 deg. F. the viscosities of the aircraft fluids
industrial hydraulic practice, and would point out that the limit-                     quoted were 5-10 centistokes in one case and about 10-30
ing factor in aircraft systems was undoubtedly the stroke/                             in the other, which figures are not greatly dissimilar from those
diameter ratiq required from the operating cylinders. Without                          quoted for industrial fluids.
this limitation, pressures higher than 5,000 lb. per sq. in. could                        He would agree that hydraulic lock already referred to by
probably be used.                                                                      Mr. Beacham was probably a function of time and pressure, but
   I n mentioning the clogging of piston valves, Mr. Beacham                           he would again emphasize that he did not see any fundamental
had emphasized a most important problem. He himself sug-                               dissimilarity between the theory based on lack of concentric
gested that the use of a filter should be noted with some reserve,                     stability and the theory based on the entry of dirt particles
since few filters removed a large proportion of particles of size                      which might well give much the same effect. At higher pres-
comparable to the dimensions of the valve clearance.                                   sures the forces involved were possibly great enough to break
   He welcomed Mr. Stables’s views on the need for progress                            down the lubricating film without the presence of dirt particles ,
and would not quarrel with those views on the subject of the                           but if these particles were present the effect might be greater
toxicity of fluids, except to mention that by careful planning                         at a lower pressure. I n any case, much careful research work
they could be kept in regions where they could do little harm,                         would be necessary before the problem was correctly under-
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                  D I S C U S S I O N O N AIRCRAFT AUXILIARY SYSTEMS AND E Q U I P M E N T                                                          301
stood. He was aware of some work in this direction already                           brakes on, a torque equivalent to the static coefficient of friction
but it was in the early stages.                                                      and the maximum brake-line pressure could certainly be
   He agreed entirely with Mr. Orloffs views that the problems                       generated, because the reaction between the tyre and the ground
on dynamic seals were both different and more difficult than                         was generally much higher at the instant of landing than it was
those of static seals. In fact most of the remarks in the paper had                  under steady rolling conditions. With certain combinations of
been directed at dynamic seals where both slow and fast motions                      friction materials there was a much greater difference between
had to be catered for. He felt that Mr. Orloff‘s remarks empha-                      the static and dynamic friction values than with others. For
sized the necessity for ensuring that there was lubrication at all                   example, some non-metallic friction materials were hygroscopic,
times. The only alternative to this was a seal capable of resisting                  and the friction value on first application tended to be much
considerable abrasion without proper lubrication, in which case                      higher than the steady value obtained almost immediately
the friction losses were inevitably very high.                                       after friction commences. It was probable that the difference
   He would point out to Mr. Hadekel that the fluids mentioned                       between the static and dynamic value of the coefficient of
by Mr. Towler were not in fact thinner than aircraft fluids, but                     friction was less in the case of metal-to-metal rubbing than
he would agree that the flatness of the viscosity curve was in                       when non-metallic friction materials were used in contact with
many ways a more important characteristic than the viscosity                         a metal surface.
at any particular temperature.                                                           It was the constant aim, of both the brake designer and the
    In regard to the design of pumps he would suggest that                           manufacturer of friction materials, to obtain a combination
rotary valve pumps were entirely practicable, but that much                          which had the greatest consistency of friction values. The very
 care had to be taken to avoid out of balance effects and high                       large temperature changes, at the rubbing surface, which took
 surface rubbing speeds. These effects usually added appreciable                     place in aircraft brakes increased the difficulty considerably,
 complications.                                                                      and combinations of materials, in many respects eminently
    He did not think that he had suggested that high pressures                       suitable, were found to give either a severe reduction in
were not suitable for industrial applications generally, and he                      coefficient of friction at the higher temperatures (commonly
presumed that it was on this point that Mr. Hadekal wished to                        referred to as “fade”) or a steep rise in the coefficient of
join issue with him. What he had said was that on the light forms                    friction after a certain temperature had been passed. There had,
of hydraulic system used for industrial purposes, in which valve                     however, been recent developments in brake drum design, and
loadings and bulk were not serious diaculties, there was little                      on the composition of non-metallic friction materials, which
point in increasing pressures until this could be done without                       had greatly increased the consistency of the combination, and
any sacrifice in durability. He fully agreed with the need for                       it was possible that an investigation into the torque variation of
using very much higher pressures where the bulk of the equip-                        modem designs of brake might well be justified.
 ment would otherwise be excessive.                                                      Both Air Commodore Banks and Mr.Towler had mentioned
    He would point out to Mr. Holland that the efficiency of the                     the use of reversible-pitch propellers. These were already in
jack mentioned in the paper was 60 per cent not 40 per cent                           use on some aircraft and it was almost certain that they would be
 and that whilst he would agree that efficiencies of 80 per cent                      increasingly applied to new aircraft designs. It was unlikely
 could be and in some cases had been achieved, they were in fact                      that reversible-pitch propellers could ever completely displace
 all too rare, but should be encouraged wherever possible.                            wheel brakes. For example, they could not be used for stopping
    The point regarding the increase of Viscosity with pressure                       a twin-engined aircraft if it had to make a landing with one
 was a good one, but as had been pointed out in the paper,                            engine inoperative. Further, wheel brakes were used quite
 increase of viscosity was not harmful if it effected a change                        extensively in taxi-ing, not only for steering purposes but also
 from turbulent to streamlined flow.                                                  to keep the taxi-ing speed within safe limits. Brakes for steering
    He agreed that the question of bulk modulus, particularly for                     might well be replaced by steerable nose wheels but they would
 systems involving flying controls, would have to be taken into                       still be required for controlling the forward speed and holding
 account. This was not as straightforward as might be imagined                        the aircraft stationary against the thrust developed in running-up
 owing to the complications due to air inclusion.                                     engines prior to taking off.
    Surface b i s h would certainly be of increased importance as                        In regard to Mr. Towler’s suggestion that air brakes, flaps,
 pressures increased and it would be of interest to discover                          and similar devices, could be used to greater advantage, he
 eventually whether there were optimum figures for this beyond                        thought it would probably be found that, for the same weight
 which it was of no advantage, and might in fact be harmful to go.                    penalty, more work could be done by the friction brake in
    He agreed that the probable use of emergency operation by                         stopping an aircraft after landing, than by increasing the
 cartridge would appear to provide the necessary pressure with-                       aerodynamic drag, with the added complication of operating
 out maintenance complications.                                                       mechanism which this implied. It had to be remembered that
    He would like to refer to Mr. Holland’s remarks on the                            large flaps might be a disadvantage during taxi-ing down-wind.
 differentially operated jack, because the only part of the system                        In reply to Air Commodore Banks’ question regarding cera-
 which could give rise to this effect was the connexion between                       mics, he wrote that, so far as he was aware, such materials had
 the valve and the jack, and if the former was mounted upon the                       not been used for the rubbing surfaces of aircraft brakes. The
 latter the length of this was very short indeed and could pre-                       use of any refractory material to prevent the heat generated at
 sumably be arranged in such a way that its safety factor and                         the friction surface from entering the brake drum would, he
 vulnerability made the possibilities of failure so exceedingly                       thought, be detrimental. Fundamentally, a friction brake con-
 remote as to be accepted. He would suggest that there were                           verted kinetic energy into heat. In order to prevent excessive
 other types of failure in more conventional systems that were                        temperatures developing at the friction surface, the heat had to
 less easy to guard against.                                                           be removed from this surface and, in the case of drum brakes,
                                                                                      this was largely done by conduction into the drum itself.
                                                                                      During the relatively short time available when stopping an
  Mr. D. A. L. ROBSONsaid in reply, in regard to Mr.                                   aircraft after landing, it was difficult to arrange for any appre-
Nicholls’ point about the large variation in brake torque, that                        ciable quantity of heat to be removed by, say, radiation, and
this was mainly due to the difference between the static and                           therefore most of the heat had to be stored in the drum. The
dynamic coefficient of friction. The static coefficient of friction                    rate at which heat was generated in an aircraft brake might be
of most combinations of materials was generally higher than the                        very great indeed, and if the mating materials were not to be
dynamic value and, with the simple brake operating system                              damaged by excessive temperatures the temperature gradient
common to-day, the undercarriage had to be stressed to cover                           through the drum had to be as low as possible. This meant that
the case of a landing being made with the brakes already fully                         the brake drum had to have a good thermal conductivity which
applied. It was not intended that aircraft should be landed with                       gave it the added advantage that its outside was raised to a
the brakes on, but the possibility should be considered; it might                      relatively high temperature, so increasing the rate at which heat
affect the strength of the aircraft. If an aircraft landed with the                    coukl be dissipated from the complete brake assembly.
                                                                                                                                                   21
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
302
                                     Discussion in Manchester
                       At the meeting of the North Western Branch on 6th March 1947
Mr. HENRYDAVIES(Warrington), with respect to the friction                               Mr. M. L. MEYER,BSc., A.M.I.Mech.E., referred to the
diagrams in Mr. Conway’s paper, wondered why the combined                            statement that it was the strength of the bond, in rubber-
effect of a side load (at the ground) with a vertical load had not                   bonded components, which had to be raised. The literature of
been investigated. The size of the wheel would surely affect the                     the makers, however, insisted that the rubber failed before the
issue.                                                                               bond, and he would like to have the author’s explanation of
   The author referred to the use of an outer cylinder in an                         these contradicting statements.
undercarriage of a high-grade light alloy, and in the particular                        Mr. Robson had spoken about the behaviour of brake
undercarriage shown, he thought there was a sliding bearing                          materials under different atmospheric conditions. He had had
in contact with the light alloy. Could the author tell them                          a similar problem with fabric asbestos brake material, and had
anything about the preparation of the light-alloy surface?                           asked the makers whether they could give any information
It would presumably not have the same finish as the inside of a                      about the behaviour of the material. The makers could not
steel cylinder. Was wear to be anticipated in that type of                           supply the desired information, but recommended moulded
surface ?                                                                            brake material, which was more consistent in its operation.
   It was, he had been told, a matter of two or three years before
this country had appreciated the fact chat the Germans used                             Mr. R. G. HOARE     (Warrington) said that Mr. Conway gave
axle castings on their aircraft-We had thought they used forgings.                   a formula for the reaction factor assuming 80 per cent efficiency
The castings were ingenious, and apparently it was possible to                       for the shock absorber, and 47 per cent for the tyre. The
fabricate a fairly complex shape, but he was a little doubtful                       efficiencies quoted there were possibly pessimistic. The tyre
about their advantages. The author suggested that one could                          could reach an efficiency of over 50 per cent and the oleo could
approach very closely to the finished shape and dispense with                        be raised to an efficiency of well over 80 per cent. He had
most of the machining; presumably one could not approach                             suggested that they should add one inch to the figure obtained
quite so closely to the finished shape in a centrifugal casting.                     from t h i s formula for the stroke on the shock absorber; that
He had also referred to the forged sliding tube in the same                          would probably give a stroke having quite a considerable surplus
undercarriage. It seemed very convenient to build the sliding                        over actual requirements. But Fig. 15 presented an adiabatic
tube integrally with the axle (the standard American practice)                       curve reaching a reaction factor of 3 ; there was apparently no
but this appeared to make the machining very difficult. Any                          surplus stroke in that case. Did the author suggest that they
weight gained by the elimination of the overlap between sliding                      should have any surplus or not? He had in mind particularly
tube and axle would tend to be Iost because of the difficulty of                     a requirement which had been added within the last six months
machining the parts afterwards. It might also have paid to                           or so, in which the undercarriage designer was required to cater
flash-weld an axle fitting to a sliding tube.                                        for a higher rate of descent than the normal, but was allowed to
   He had hoped that a rather fuller reference would have been                       achieve a higher reaction factor. If they designed the shock
made in Mr. Robson’s paper, to methods of heat dissipation in                        absorber so that it barely covered the normal requirement, they
brakes-a very important point indeed. Had the author any                             were likely to have very little control over their maximum
fuller information to give in regard to fin types of heat dis-                       reaction factor under this new case, and the load might be really
sipation ? Could not one draw, in part, on the experience of                         excessive.
engine designers ? They cooled an exhaust valve, by filling it                          He would also like Mr. Conway’s comments on other require-
with liquid sodium-a splendid method of dissipating heat.                            ments which fixed the compression ratio and inflation pressure
Heat dissipation of a novel and much more effective type was                         of the shock absorber. He had in mind the braked taxi-ing case
required; at present radiation from a large mass of metal was                        for a nose undercarriage, and the turning case for a main
used and the brakes became excessively heavy j wheels in this                        undercarriage. Those loads were generally fairly large and
country were in any case heavier than they should be, and the                        applied relatively slowly, so that they could be achieved with
brakes were an important contributing factor.                                        little assistance from the oil damping, and could be assumed
                                                                                     to be loads on the isothermal air curves. They had then three
   Mr. K. G. HANCOCK      (Warrington) asked Mr. Parker to                           conditions to satisfy: they had a maximum reaction which
amplify his statement that hydraulic jacks only just met the                         they must not exceed on the adiabatic curve, and a static
reliability requirements and to indicate how this was affected                       reaction, and braked taxi-ing or turning, on their isothermal
by the pressures which the jacks used.                                               curve.
   Mr. R. J. B. WOODHAMS        (Manchester) asked Mr. Conway                          Mr. J. R. FINNIECOME,  M.Eng., M.I.Mech.E., observed that
whether he could hold out any hope’ of the allowable leg                             Mr. Parker had referred to the temperature range through
inclination being increased. With p = 0.3, the tipping angle                         which the pistons in the landing mechanism had to operate.
was 169 deg. and, with sideways retraction into a wing surface,                      Near the equator the temperature was above 100 deg. F., while,
considerable ingenuity was required in order to avoid com-                           in England, the temperature might be below freezing point.
plicating structures as a result of the centre of gravity’s being                    Surely allowances must be made for piston clearance, so that
fixed relative to leading edge.                                                      the landing gear could work satisfactorily. He would like to
   Also he pointed out that leg length was usually fixed by                          know the clearance on the operating pistons.
airscrew clearance under 3g closure and tyre deflation. Con-
siderable weight could be saved by decreasing the distance from                         Mr. H. G . CONWAY    said in reply to Mr. Davies that the point
static to 3g closure. Was this more possible with liquid springing?                  about the side load was correct enough.Those questions were only
   The aircraft manufacturer had, in certain cases, departed                         ones of the criteria involved. Having designed one undercarriage
from hydraulics on the score of weight and cleanliness. In                           with a certain percentage of friction by a particular method, they
raising the working pressures, the hydraulic engineers were                          should be able to design another on the same lines, providing
merely chasing the pneumatic protagonists j where woul&.this                         the other undercarriage was geometrically the same as the first
end? Had Mr. Parker any comparative figures on installation                          one. When the sizes of wheels were altered, it would make a
weights?                                                                             difference. It was probably wrong to use that method without
                                         Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
                  D I S C U S S I O N ON AIRCRAFT A U X I L I A R Y SYSTEMS AND E Q U I P M E N T                          303
adaption when using undercarriages with twin wheels, because emphasize that such jacks must have relatively low friction and
                                                             this implied lubrication without leakage. As an opinion, he
the wheels were much smaller and the influence of the side loads
would be greater.                                            would doubt whether any current designs of jack would give
                                                             100,000 operations at full load without failure. This, of course,
   As regards bearing materials aluminium alloy was excellent.
                                                             was a very big margin over most requirements, as 10,000 opera-
Bronze and light alloy usually worked fairly well when properly
lubricated. Wear, in the ordinary engineering sense, did nottions had been the most that anyone had thought necessary for
exist in undercarriages. They did not do enough work to wear undercarriages or other similar hydraulic services. When, how-
out, but it was damage or corrosion which was the trouble.   ever, it became necessary to consider services that worked
                                                             continuously in fiight, this standard of reliability and life was
   He entirely agreed with Mr. Davies’s remark about steel cast-
ings and undercarriages. It was unfortunate that this countryquite insufficient and something very much better must be
                                                             offered. He would like to hear the views of others on this point,
could not produce steel castings for the airframe until the war
                                                             about which t k r e was usually much reticence.
was finished-the available steel casting capacity being engaged
in making engine liners. As regards welding, this was still the As regards the nature of the eventual failure, it could be said
only country of any importance which did not weld its under- that this was not solely wear by abrasion, but was also dis-
carriages.                                                   integration by exuusion into working clearances.
   He agreed with the comment about the difficulty of machining In reply to Mr. Woodhams, the question of relative weights
                                                             of different types of system had been a contentious point for a
a sliding tube with an axle on the end. It was obviously possible
but required large machine tools not normally available.     long time. It was impossible to generalize; and many of the
    The Germans had some remarkable fish-welded under-       comparisons made in the past had been between one installation
                                                             five or more years old, and another that was an estimated weight
 carriages at the end of the war, where the whole thing was joined
                                                             only. He would suggest that the only possible comparison was
together by flash-welding. The production runs involved had to
 be very large indeed to justify it.                         weighed weights (on a given aeroplane) of alternative systems.
   Replying to Mr. Woodhams, it was obvious that the position   Obviously the question of weight was of great importance,
                                                             and he had suggested that an increase of pressure of 4,000 lb.
of the wheel was determined by airframe considerations and was
                                                             per sq. in. might achieve a weight saving of about 10 per cent.
nothing to do with the undercarriage designer. In tail wheel lay-
                                                             He did not feel qualified to answer for pneumatic specialists who
outs it was usually governed by the tendency of the aircraft to
nose over, and he would have thought that slightly more than might cherish great ambitions of offering much lower weights.
                                                                I n reply to Mr. Finniecome, piston clearances on most
 16 deg. would be desirable. It was obviously related to the power
                                                             hydraulic mechanisms working up to 3,000 lb. per sq. in. were
 of the brake. In the case of a tricycle it was more involved. If
                                                             of the order of 0*002-0*005
 there were a large angle, it prevented the nose coming off the                             inch, although this figure varied
 ground. If there were too small an angle, it might become   somewhat with diameter, and was tower for small piston rods
                                                             than for large tubes. This clearance was sufficient to prevent
 critically small and prevent stability. The angle of the leg was
                                                             trouble-ertainly
 not important in itself. It w a s tied up with the overhang and the              over the range of temperatures at which
                                                              undercarriages had to work-but
 overlap. If they made the angle worse, they could get the same                                    he agreed that differential
 performance by increasing the overlap or decreasing the over-contraction had to be carefully watched on hydraulic equipment
                                                             intended to work over a very wide temperature range.
 hang. If the angle of the leg were extreme, then they would have
 to fall back to levered suspension, in that case fully justified.
    The question of the flexibility of the liquid spring was
 interesting. Its static position was only a question of the com-                         Mr. D. A. L. ROBSONsaid in reply that Mr. Davies had
 pression ratio in the unit or the general shape of the elasticity                     mentioned the question of heat dissipation from a brake. During
 curve. He would have thought that could be varied within broad                        an aircraft landing run there were two aspects of the heat
 limits.                                                                               problem which had to be considered; (1) the brake had to con-
    Replying to Mr. Meyer, in the author’s experience the limit-                       vert a large amount of energy into heat, and (2) the rate of heat
 ing factor on rubber shear or torsion springs as applied to under-                    generation was very high.
 carriages was, in fact, the strength of the bond under endurance                         The time duration of the landing run was so small that it was
 test.                                                                                 unlikely that any scheme could be devised which would result
    In reply to Mr. Hoare, he said that there was very little infor-                   in an appreciable dissipation of heat during this period. Im-
 mation available on tyre efficiency. The current practice was to                      provements could, he thought, be made so as to increase the
 use the ordinary static deflexion curves; these were slightly less                    rate of heat dissipation after the landing run and so reduce the
 efficient than a steel spring, and the efficiency was generally                       time which must elapse before another landing could be made.
 taken as about 47 per cent. Some of the tyre makers claimed that                      Finning of the drum and the generation of an air flow across the
 they could absorb slightly more energy when they dropped the                          drum surface had been shown to help. Liquid cooling with the
 tyre. The modern tendency was to disregard that, because the                          possible use of the latent heat of the liquid might be useful but
 difference was very small, and in the second place it was not at                      so far little success had been found from this approach.
 all sure that the increase was real.                                                     The real difficulty was in the short period of the landing run
    With regard to the shock absorber, the highest efficiency he                       when heat was being generated at a high rate. If the temperature
 had come across was 93 per cent on a single drop. He thought it                       at the rubbing surface was to be kept within allowable limits the
 very unwise to take an average figure of more than 80 per cent,                       heat must be conducted away from the surface rapidly. In drum
 because on some designs they might not actually achieve much                          type brakes this meant the drum should have a good thermal
 more than that.                                                                       conductivity so as to reduce the temperature gradient through
    He still felt that a wise designer would provide more travel                       the material. This would result in the outside surface of the
 than required to satisfy calculation.                                                 drum rising to a higher temperature more rapidly and should
    The scope of the paper did not cover nose-wheel shock                              help also with the heat dissipation problem. The most attractive
 absorbers but was confined to main units where the compression                        feature of the friction brake was its simplicity and he thought
 ratio would be about 4. The nose-wheel unit had to deal with                          every effort should be made to retain this.
 additional requirements as correctly outlined by Mr. Hoare.                              Mr. Meyer’s experience of woven asbestos type friction
  Higher compression ratios were certainly necessary, even as                          materials and their sensitivity to atmospheric conditions was
 high as 10, and if means could be found to absorb energy during                       interesting. The development of non-metallic friction materials
 slow closure or braking, so much the better.                                          for high duty brakes was a very complex problem and one which
                                                                                       had been receiving the active attention of manufacturers for
  Mr. S. M. PARKER,     in reply to Mr. Hancock, said that his                         some time. In the present state of the art it did seem as though
remarks on jack reliability were essentially the result of experi-                     moulded materials might prove superior to the woven type but
ence. He had made the point in the paper, and would again                              it was difficult to forecast what developments might take place.
                                          Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016
304
                                                   Lornrnunications
Air Commodore F. R. BANKS,       C.B., M.I.Mech.E., R.A.F.V.R.,                     carriage was still the safest type to deal with such emergencieson
wrote that he would like to comment on Mr. Conway’s answer                          the runway.
to him that if they had used the tricycle undercarriage in the war
they would have taken a lower load of bombs to drop on the                            Mr. G. R. SHEARER,    G.I.Mech.E., wrote that with reference
enemy. His reply to this was that quite a number of night                           to the proposed replacement of wheels by skids, would Mr.
bombers were prevented from taking part in operations because                       Conway explain the benefits to be derived from this form of
of a swing upon take-off; which at night was not always easy                        undercarriage. Was that change due to weight problems, or
to check in the early stages and could become uncontrollable.                       to some high-speed factor such as breakdown caused by over-
Also, in his opinion, the tricycle undercarriage would have been                    heating of the cover? Further, would Mr. Conway give any
a safer proposition in landing bombers after an operation; in                       further information as to the nature of the specially prepared
which weather, damage to aircraft, and general weariness of the                     surfaces to be used as runways, and also had any investigations
crew all played a part in making landing a tricky business.                         been made as to the type of undercarriage required by such a
Further, he would not necessarily agree that a machine with a                       system?
tricycle undercarriage carried less load; particularly in the
military sense where one did carry much higher loads than were                          Mr. H. G. CONWAY      wrote in reply that he fully appreciated
considered safe and practicable in civil aviation. Whilst the                        Air Commodore Banks’s remarks about swinging at take-off on
rricycle undercarriage weighed somewhat more than the tail-                          a rail-wheel aircraft. Much of the difficulty with one or two
wheel type, the former probably would allow the same military                        particularly bad war-time aircraft could have been got over by
load to be taken off in the same length of runway; even though                       using a tail-wheel castoring lock. The real answer to the ques-
the all-up weight of the machine was slightly greater.                               tion, why more British aircraft did not have tricycle under-
    Finally, commenting on the reply to the question regarding                       carriages, was probably that in 1935-6, when this country’s
the help which might be given by reversing pitch propellers,                         main operational type were conceived, nothing was known about
that this type of propeller would not be much use in the case of                     nose-wheels, and what had been used before had to be used
 a twin-engined machine and the failure of one engine, he would                      again. It took some time for the claims put forward by the
mention that while one had to allow for accidents, these were                        United States to be accepted, and by that time it was too late.
not in the majority, and the normal safe day-to-day operation of                        The questions raised by Mr. Shearer had been mainly dealt
the machine must be mainly considered. In the case of emergency                      with in the reply to Air Commodore Oliver. The whole question
 due to the stoppage of one engine it would obviously be a ques-                     of skids for aircraft was being investigated, but no final con-
 tion of using the wheel brakes to the full, and a tricycle under-                   clusions had been drawn.
                                        Downloaded from pme.sagepub.com at The University of Auckland Library on June 5, 2016