4 Reformation of Contracts
4 Reformation of Contracts
4 Reformation of Contracts
1359 to 1369)
Reformation
- When, there having been a meeting of the minds of the parties to a contract, their true
intention is not expressed in the instrument purporting to embody the agreement, by reason of
mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct or accident, one of the parties may ask for the reformation
of the instrument to the end that such true intention may be expressed ----- if mistake, fraud,
inequitable conduct or accident has prevented a meeting of the minds of the parties, the proper
remedy is not reformation of the instrument but annulment of the contract (art. 1359)
- A remedy whereby a written instrument to the contract is amended to conform to the true
intentions of the parties.
- Only the instrument of the contract will be reformed, not the contract itself.
- Requisites:
o There is a valid contract – essential elements of a contract are present
o The written instrument does not conform the true intention of the parties – the written
intention is different from what the parties agreed
o The non-conformity is due to mistake, fraud, inequitable conduct or accident
- Reformation happens after the perfection of the contract where the disagreement between the
written instrument and agreement exists.
MUTUAL MISTAKE
o When a mutual mistake of the parties causes the failure of the instrument to disclose
the real agreement, said instrument may be reformed (art. 1361).
o Either party may seek reformation
o If one party was mistaken and the other acted fraudulently or inequitably in such a way
that the instrument does not show their true intention, the former may ask for the
reformation of the instrument (art. 1362)
o The injured party has the option to ask for reformation
o When one party was mistaken and the other knew or believed that the instrument did
not state their real agreement, but concealed that fact from the former, the instrument
may be reformed (art. 1363)
IGNORANCE, LACK OF SKILL, NEGLIGENCE OR BAD FAITH ON THE PART OF THE PERSON DRAFTING THE
INSTRUMENT
o When through the ignorance, lack of skill, negligence or bad faith on the part of the
person drafting the instrument or of the clerk or typist, the instrument does not express
the true intention of the parties, the courts may order that the instrument be reformed
(art. 1364)
- A party who enforces the instrument representing the contract cannot subsequently ask for its
reformation (art. 1367)
o The party who enforces the mistaken cannot seek reformation
- Reformation may be ordered at the instance of either party or his successors in interest, if the
mistake was mutual; otherwise, upon petition of the injured party, or his heirs and assigns (art.
1368)