Newbies Guide Playing With Startups
Newbies Guide Playing With Startups
www.hypeinnovation.com
HYPE Innovation Report
by Jaspar Roos
https://www.xlfamily.com/
http://futureideas.org/
http://chiefhumorofficer.com/
Content
Introduction 3
Failure to launch 4
Growth hacking 30
Epilogue 40
The Newbie’s Guide to Playing with Startups follows the story of an experienced
innovation manager, Jim, who has the task to solve his company’s biggest innovation
challenge that threatens its entire existence.
Along the way, Jim learns a lot and gets to dive into an unfamiliar world – that of startups,
where nothing seems to be done the way he was thought it should be done.
***
Jim closed his eyes and concentrated on his breathing for a second. His head was full
of confusing thoughts, going back and forth. And he had a nasty feeling in his gut –
ever since the 10 a.m. meeting he’d had that day with Jeff - the CEO of Enterprise Inc.
locations!
full commercial integration? These deals will be off the market soon and there will be
no room left for us. We must catch on! Need to come up with a new strategy. YOU
When he opened his eyes again, he realized he was in the middle of a circle of people,
all peers – each and every one of them an innovation manager at some bank or a tech
“Hi! I’m Jim, innovation manager at Enterprise Inc. At our organization, we are
struggling with innovating and we need to change. We are progressively losing our
position and our markets are shrinking by the minute. We need a new approach to
Yes, it was official now; he had joined a support group for innovation managers. What
they all had in common was the fact that, despite of their organizations’ legacies,
market reach, and vast resources, startups were threatening to take them out of
business.
Jim was longing for the old times – albeit not so long ago – when corporations were
dominating the business scene. Business was all about them and customers were
all about the next big and exciting product they would introduce to the market.
***
Failure to launch
Globally, companies are under increasing pressure from multiple stakeholders, e.g.
the government, if you are in the financial markets, NGO’s and ecological institutions
for anything in the farming or energy sector, law enforcement agencies, if you are in
markets where parties like Uber dominate, and, of course, shareholders. More and more
companies are failing to meet their expectations or struggle to deliver better results than
their competitors. The current environment is increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex,
ambiguous and interconnected, and it is of great importance for companies to learn how
to adapt faster than the pace of the market.
In the midst of the “digital disruption” era, the market expects innovations and inventions
to come in any form and from any place. There is an evident shift in existing business
models. Take, for instance, the way we get news these days – the entire industry has been
disrupted by moving form an offline to an online medium of distribution. And it’s a fact
that in cases like this, big companies are the last ones to make a move. Corporations are
slow to accepting and adapting to such disruptive movements but in order to survive they
need to take action and get involved.
At the current churn rate, 75% of the S&P 500 will be replaced by 2027 1. As in the case
of Kodak, which went bankrupt in 2012, newer, cheaper technology disrupts giants’ core
businesses, making it difficult for them to survive or sustain competitiveness.
Never before has it been as easy to start a company as it is now and this permits one-to-
many players in the game. In the current market situation, big companies are standing
face-to-face with their younger, more agile, flexible and adaptive competitors.
The situations, described as such, could seem a bit exaggerated and slightly extreme. It
is not that doomsday for corporations is around the corner, but there is a rising threat for
big companies out there that refuse to jump on board and surf the “change wave”. Instead
of making a safe bet by clinging onto the present, companies must find a way to ensure a
steady inflow of ideas and products that respectively will deliver value to clients.
More and more, innovation is at the center of attention when it comes to undertaking
a different growth (survival) strategy. Big companies that fail to innovate are at risk
of extinction. When they cannot find the right solution inside, they must search for it
outside the company boundaries.
At the same time, it happens more often than not that talented, young people are
dropping out of university, and even out of high-school, to start their own companies.
There are numerous well-known examples from the past few years, for instance, Arash
Ferdowsi who dropped out of MIT to found Dropbox, Mark Zuckerberg – Facebook, Bill
Gates – Microsoft, Matt Mullenweg - WordPress. PayPal’s co-founder Peter Thiel is
among the rising number of proponents to the claim that going to college is not worth it
in the age of startups. Chances are that the next big market disruption is currently under
construction by a group of smart tech grads who joined forces and understood what the
market wants – better and faster.
Remember Jim? Well, after his meeting at the IMA (Innovation Managers Anonymous),
he started reflecting on everything that had been discussed that evening. He could
clearly see a tendency among all of the innovation managers – all of them explicitly or
“Indeed,” Jim thought to himself, “in the past years startups have dramatically
changed the business scene. They always seem to have the first-mover advantage,
coming up with these ‘garage’ inventions. Seriously! It’s like they are pulling those out
of thin air!”
“Moreover,” he was wondering, “are the brilliant minds at Enterprise Inc. simply
it ourselves, maybe we should look for ways to bring such innovations in from the
outside.”
***
Every company wants to be innovative and disrupt the market. Innovative companies get
bigger and live longer. Simply being a successful company, though, doesn’t mean that the
organization is a disruptive one. Moreover, not every company can become innovative by
itself. A recent study by EY 2 shows that around 39% of big organizations globally have
been experiencing challenges in product innovation within the last three years.
Faced with innovation challenges, more and more companies are starting to recognize the
need for a different approach.
Who is hiding and who is seeking? Are corporations and startups looking
for each other?
In recent years, we see a growing number of companies are starting to implement startup-
like techniques, such as the lean startup and scrum methodologies, in their efforts to
be more sustainable and efficient. As an innovation manager you can’t allow yourself to
be waiting on the side lines for a new technology to hit the market and try to buy it. If
you do this, you will just find yourself lagging behind. By the time you actually manage
to get your hands on the technology, the opportunity to turn it into a viable product that
would be of interest to the market will be long gone. Your organization cannot afford
to wait for innovation to knock on the door, but rather has to strive to stay in line with
current disruptions and be explicitly involved with those startups that are responsible for
the occurring disruptions. The speed of change is different and clearly visible comparing
Rogers’s market segment theory with Downes’ big-bang disruption.
Jim clearly recognized the perks of working together with startups. After all, he wasn’t
blind to the tendency for new products coming from smaller, previously unknown
players on the innovation field (Uber, Tinder, Pinterest, Instagram, Xiaomi, etc.).
***
When talking about corporate organizations and startups working together, it cannot
be expected (or recommended) that collaboration happens all of a sudden. Quite on the
contrary, collaboration is an ongoing, gradual process comprised of stages with different
intensity of interaction.
Collaboration between startups and corporations starts at point T0, when insights about
the situation, possible collaborators, and techniques how to approach them are being
gathered. The actual match happens after that point, followed by cross-organizational
exchange of knowledge and learnings, experimentation, and collaboration. Every next
stage of collaborative interaction implies a stronger engagement, commitment, and trust
between both sides.
The next morning, Jim woke up full of energy. He was seriously considering the
possibility of working together with a startup, or even a few, to get his company out
of the deadlocked situation. By the time he got his morning coffee in his hand, he was
asking himself one very basic, but still vital, question: “Where should I start off?” After
all, he had spent the last fifteen years in a corporate suit. What did he even know
about startups? Not much. Before even considering getting involved with startups, he
needed to get some insights. He fired up his laptop and typed a single word into the
***
Startups – breezy, cool, and hip. They excel at bringing in the new, the other, and the
different. Their unorthodox approach is what brings them traction. They reside at the
edge of the existing business model and change the rules of the game by disrupting the
status quo.
Often startups are referred to as toddlers. Indeed, they could be emotional, naïve and
inexperienced. But just like kids, startups are not afraid to ask questions, experiment and
be creative.
• Market reach. Startups have limited reach and distribution on the market. Through
leveraging corporate distribution outlets they can get to the market faster.
• Publicity. Experienced companies that have been out around for a while have been
through all the ups and downs of public relations. They can help young firms to get
through tricky situations and avoid tragedies by sharing the lessons they have learned.
• Funding. It is not a secret that companies need money to survive and grow. Usually,
big companies have it and small, developing ones are looking for it.
“Ok, so far so good,” said Jim to himself, “So what could be the best way to meet and
***
Meeting up and connecting with startups is getting easier and easier. There is quite a
range of activities that a big organization can engage in to start the dialogue with smaller
organizations.
• Keep track of startups via databases; startup databases can be thought of as address
or phone books for startups. This a straight forward approach to sourcing contact and
other general information about small companies in the market. Some examples are
platforms like VentureScout, DutchStartupDatabase, BetaList, AngelList, or
www.ventur.es.
• Attending and hosting startup festivals; startup conferences, festivals, and fairs
are a good place to meet and network with startups. At events of this sort, startups
usually show off their products and services. This is a great opportunity to get a first-
hand demonstration of what the startup’s solution is, get insights on the product and
potential pitfalls.
Startup festivals and annual summits have shown how big companies can directly
engage with the startup world. For instance, Unilever engages with startups through a
direct call for collaboration at global events such as the annual Mobile World Congress
(MWC) in Barcelona in 2014, where they managed to sign contracts with 11 startups.
• Tours to startup hotspots; during the past few years, it has been quite trendy for big
companies to organize trips and tours to startup hotspots. Companies such as Citrix,
Google, Walmart, Cisco, Wipro, Intel, and Bosch pay visits to the incubation and co-
creation Startup Warehouse in Bangalore. Moreover, among the top hotspots in 2014
are Silicone Valley, Sydney, Tel Aviv, Sao Paulo, Melbourne, Chicago, New York, etc.
• Startup networks; Microsoft, Orange, Google, Adobe, Paypal, McAfee, TCS, Sasken,
Morgan Lewis, and Bank of Ireland are all companies that actively leverage startup
networks, such as MobileMonday, Startup Week, Open Coffee Club, Creative
Sundays and Startup Weekend to meet up with startups. Regularly, at such events,
entrepreneurs meet up to discuss current industry trends, talk about issues and
solutions, and promote their ideas.
Jim stepped away from the computer. He never thought there were so many different
ways to connect to startups, but in all fairness, never before did he need to even think
The opportunity to meet startups in person got him quite enthusiastic. He wanted to
attend a startup event (of any sort), dive into that world and see what all the fuss was
about. Big innovation-focus news outlets like FastCompany and TechCrunch seemed
to praise the startup culture and claimed that one does not simply talk to startups the
That was the point when Jim googled “what to do when going to meet startups”. What
he found was:
***
1. Keep it casual; meeting startups is nothing like the average stand-up or board
meeting you attend. Loose the suit – a regular pair of jeans and a hoodie will “buy”
you an entrance ticket. Naturally, suits are almost always appropriate, but you’re
going to stand out rather than blend in. Moreover, in a startup environment this
could convey seniority and superiority. This, subsequently, can result in pushing
away the entrepreneurs you are trying to get a hold of and miss out on opportunities
for collaboration.
Note: Bear in mind that quite a few of the entrepreneurs starting companies have
their background in the corporate world. They are seldom impressed and are a tough
audience to deal with.
2. Learn to understand basic startup language; startups
and corporates speak different languages. Often there
is a discrepancy between what one side says and what
the other understands. In order to collaborate efficiently,
corporates must learn how to decipher the startup
language. Here is a short dictionary of phrases that can
come in handy:
***
Jim was excited. The information he had gone through for the past few hours got him
even more interested in startups. He found the way they function, their beliefs and
spirit both puzzling and inspiring. Jim clearly felt the need to dive in and explore the
startup world.
He did a quick search. Luckily for him, there was the Pitch Your Startup event this
same week.
A couple of days later Jim went to the event. He took a look at the crowd of young, hip
You could tell he was not in his element, but judging by the way he looked, he had
followed all the recommendations that he found in his research. Apparently, he left his
corporate suit at home and wore jeans and a blazer, instead (a hoodie just wasn’t his
style and seemed to be a little bit over the top). Moreover, he went undercover and
skipped the “corporate” badge. With an open mind for adventure he dived into the pool
After spending over four hours of talking to people, Jim began to grow tired. So much
In his opinion, many of these kids did have great ideas but only little understanding
of how the business world works. And it was a shame that only a few would make it
to a couple of delivery giants across Europe, currently being used for short distance
deliveries. They enjoyed a pleasant chat, and now Jim was thinking about if and how
recognized an opportunity for both of them to benefit from each other’s knowledge,
***
Startup strategies are not only for startups anymore. There is a whole lot that
corporations can learn from startups. It is not that people working at startups are
smarter or more skillful than those at big companies; their advantage is a culture of
experimentation and adventurous spirit.
Bigger companies can clearly benefit from assuming some characteristics of the startup
mentality.
• In times of rapid change, rapid movement is required. Speed has become an asset
that big companies rarely possess. Unlike them, startups are moving fast and gather
momentum.
• Startups don’t play by the rules because they don’t care about the existing business
and the market modalities. Rather than that, they focus on delivering customer
solutions by redefining the market.
• They rarely do market research the conventional way. Instead, they build a very simple
and cheap product version and give it to real customers to assess.
• Startups recognize needs and focus on filling the void even before coming up with
a business model. It is all about creating the asset first – profit comes later. Vivid
examples of this are most digital businesses today, e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Google.
Corporations are rather risk-averse, especially as for them failures are more public. They
tend to spend months and even years in developing a new product without ever showing
it until it is perfected and ready to go to the market. Ironically, as new products are
being delivered to the market with an increasingly rapid pace, their approach holds the
exact risks they aim to avoid – not meeting customer needs and wants, an increase in
development costs, and, eventually, failure.
The adoption of Lean Startup methodology within corporate innovation programs is on its
way to becoming a mainstream technique for bigger organizations. The approach changes
the process of innovation and starting a new venture. It builds on rapid experimentation,
customer feedback and iterative design development. Lean startup adopters ask a
“should” rather than a “could” question, namely: “Should we build this product?”
Some big companies like General Electric, Amazon, Qualcomm and Intuit, have already
started to implement the lean startup methodology to transform the way they innovate.
At the core of the methodology is the build-measure-learn feedback loop. They start with
a minimum viable product (MVP) that addresses a problem. Once an MVP is established,
it goes under a learning process of validation, allowing for figuring out what the customers
want and how much they would pay for it, and tailoring the product according to these
learnings.
The build-measure-learn loop lowers development costs by minimizing the risk of having a
failing final product. Instead, the process provides timely feedback that allows for making
improvements during the early development stages.
Traditional marketers are skilled at understanding traditional products, but the internet
has so radically changed the way we define products that traditional tactics don’t cut it
anymore. Growth hackers are not substitutes of marketers. They are just different as they
are obsessively focused on the single goal of growth, doing things in a non-traditional way.
Currently, growth hacking is a startup’s practice. As startups usually lack resources and
established (partner) affiliations that would allow them to effectively apply traditional
marketing tactics, they are, in a way, forced to growth hack.
If you want someone to market your product – get yourself a marketer. But if what you
are actually looking for is a person who will be actively involved in helping you shape your
product – then your organization is in need of a growth hacker.
Growth (hacking) is still a developing field. There is a growing number of young growth
hackers who are looking for opportunities to learn and gain experience, but the number of
experts with strong history of delivering results is not that big.
1. Be aware of what the company needs; in order to find the best candidate and
ensure a successful fit for your organization, you have to be in line with the specific
company needs. Every company is different and has specific needs for growth that
are not universally applicable to other companies. Before even starting to look for a
candidate, try answering the following questions:
1. What stage of growth is your company currently in?
2. What weaknesses does our company have that a growth hacker could help
address?
3. What particular measures would help your company to grow?
4. What metrics do you need to determine the “success” of a growth hacker’s
work?
The very essence of experimentation lies in trying out something new and finding out
if and how it works. On one hand, we have startups, whose existence is based on the
philosophy of being lean, agile, and flexible. In that sense, experimentation is their driving
force. In contrast, large companies don’t have a let’s-try-some-things-and-see-what-
sticks type of culture. The majority of giants is neither lean, nor flexible, which makes
them less prone to engage in experiments.
However, there are good reasons for experiments, even within bigger corporations:
• Outsourcing tasks (reports, research, challenges); often opportunities for growth and
desires to expand exist within the company. Outsourcing various activities is a great
way to look for inspiration and ideas from the outside. In many cases, outsourcing
allows access to expert talent, innovative approaches, latest technology, and creative,
cutting-edge solutions that otherwise aren’t available.
The objective of reaching out to smaller firms is to obtain new knowledge, applicable
to your business' needs, which can eventually result in new or improved products,
processes, systems, or services.
• Accelerators; it is quite common for big companies to establish and foster startup
accelerators to drive disruptive innovation. Accelerators help startups get off the
ground, providing small seed capital and access to a mentor network usually in
exchange for a small percentage of equity. Among the most well-known accelerators
are Y Combinator, Techstars, and Brandery.
The goal is to “accelerate” the growth of an existing company, shortening the process
from a couple of years to a few months. Within these few months, startups are being
guided and helped to get the company into the best possible shape – getting to the
point where their product is impressive enough to raise investment.
Once the experimentation phase has proven successful, we are looking into a potential
long-term commitment between the startup and the corporation. In other words, this is
the “dating, pre-marriage” phase – discussing, brainstorming, and trying to meet each
other half-way. At that stage, potential hurdles are being discussed and questions and
concerns about the shared future spring up:
• Keeping the startup mentality alive. Corporate culture differs significantly from the
culture of startups, and it is quite difficult for them to comprehend and embrace the
chaos that comes when working with smaller companies. Thus, keeping the startup
mentality alive can be quite the challenge. To bring back the balance, corporations
could be tempted to impose their rules. However, if the startup culture suffers,
creativity will suffer, too.
A lot of things can be said about working with startups. However, as a corporate, you have
a solid base for innovation established before you start working with startups.
1. Create a culture for innovation. This is the most important element in any
organization. Make sure you have an organizational culture that supports innovation
and has commitment from all management layers, including the top management.
Involving cross-functional teams from all over the organization in creating a culture
innovation helps to recognize new innovative possibilities in the first place. The
cultural aspect is the most important element to stimulate people to learn to free
their minds, experiment, and dare to challenge the status quo. In this way, as a
leader, you empower your staff to be more innovative, and you build the confidence
to say, “Yes, we can do this here.”
3. Open up for open innovation and start-ups. Open innovation programs and the
collaboration with external parties will take your innovation program to the next
level. Whether you work with partners or startups, open programs can allow for new
market entries, cross-market insights and business changing innovations.
***
So, in the end, Jim got his innovation. First, he met up with several startups. He chose
Drones Inc., a new startup based in Hong Kong. Drones Inc. was a typical university
spin-off, with great vision and a first prototype, destined to conquer the market.
After several Skype meetings, Jim invited them to come over and give a pitch in front
of his senior management. In the following days, several delays occurred. Compliance
and Legal departments first came in with a lot of regulations he had to comply with.
The Enterprise Inc. departments were used to work with peers who were able to deal
with a lot of legal jargon and thick contracts. This startup didn’t have a similar legal
office and had trouble sifting through all the hundreds of corporate clauses. So Jim
had to find a workaround for this. Help came from his CEO, who gave him a waiver to
Second, there was a long dialogue on what the value of the startup was, as it was very
difficult to assess this with the existing valuation models of Enterprise Inc. Should he
focus on getting a minority share or a huge part of the shares? He asked for several
experts and there was no definite answer. The best answer what he received was a 50
percent split.
Clearly, this was not wat Drones Inc. had imagined beforehand. Although they had
no serious sales yet, they believed they should keep the majority of the shares in
the company. The three consecutive days, he was not able to close a deal on an
Inc. Combining this into a new service, he was able to leverage both the power of the
cooperation as a lead partner and get the cooperation with the startup going. This was
much easier. Not only for Enterprise Inc. but also for Drones Inc. this made a lot of
sense. They wanted to experiment fast to show the world what they had in store. With
a strong partner like Enterprise Inc., they would be able to gain credibility fast and get
1. A large organization is very appealing for startups, but many internal corporate
processes are not well designed for cooperation with small and emerging startups.
You need CEO support to get this off the ground.
2. If you want to get around bureaucratic processes, you need to show some results
first by launching experiments with startups. That also helps to understand the
process better.
And just to conclude the story, Jim graduated from IMA (Innovation Managers
***