0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 72 views8 pagesUTOPIA LMT Political Law SISSES ONLY WITH WATERMARK
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF UTOPIA
‘TENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF LAW
SINCE 1964
“For tomorrow shall cast a myriad of mighty storms that only
those with firm determination and Utopian vision do survive.”
What are the requisites for the valid exercise of Police Power?
1. Lawful Subject - The interests of the public, generally, as distinguished from those of
2 particular class, require such Interference and that the subject of the measure is
within the scope of the police power. (Ichong v. Hernandez, G.R. No. L-7995)
2. Lawful Means - The means employed are reasonably necessary for the accomplishment
of the purpose and not unduly oppressive upon individuals. (National Development
3ee7 UT - 0a
It is @ tax saving device within the means|It is a scheme used outside of those
‘sanctioned by law. This method should be used | lawful means and when availed of, it
by the taxpayer in good faith and at arms | usually subjects the taxpayer to further
length. or additional civil or criminal liabilities.
(GIR v. Estate of Benigno Toda, G.R. No, 147188)
Page 1 of 8THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF UTOPIA
Political Law Tips
Bar Operations 2022
What is the tax treatment when it comes to different types of educational
institutions?
Tax Non-stock, non-profit educational Proprietary educational
institution institution
135 years of age on
of the election.
election. (PHIL CONST., Art.
VU, Sec. 2)
Page 2 of 8
For Party-list Representative:
A bona-fide member of the
party or organization which he
seeks to represent for at least
90 days preceding the day of
the election. (Party-List
System Act, Sec. 9)THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF UTOPIA
Political Law Tips
Bar Operations 2022
=
Is preventive suspension an interruption of a term of an elective official?
ffice although he is barred from exercising
the suspension period. The best indicator
bsence of a permanent replacement and
exists. (Aldovino v. COMELEC, G.R.
No. The suspended official continues to stay in o
the functions and prerogatives of the office within
of the suspended official’s continuity in office is the at
the lack of the authority to appoint one since no vacancy
No, 184836) = 7
What are the requisites for {he proper invocation of Executive privilege?
| ]
1. The ‘protected communication, must relates
presidential power; — =
The communication must be authored or solicited and recel
the president or the President himself, The judicial testis that an advis
perational proximity with the President 2 Se :
one ora Showing of compéllig ned that would justify thejlimitation of
the privilege and the unavajabllty. of the-information elsewhere by an’ appropriate
investigating authority. age ‘Committee on Accountability of Pyblic Officers
toi quintessential and non-delegable
ived by a close advisor of
or must be in
apd Investigations GRA 10643) 9
What ig the rule governing nidnight appoint d itsexceptions?
oye oer s
‘Two (2)|months immediel Before the next-preSidential elections afd |UB\to the end of his
term, a] President or Acti9g| President, shall not pak appgintyents, eXgept temporary
appointments to-exedutive, positions»when continued vacandes therein will prejudice public
service or endanger publi¢ safety- However, this prohibition jis limited only to appointments
in the Executive Department, with fo prohibition existing for the judiciary. (De Castro v. JBC,
Pe ne
G.R. No, 191002)" ?
EAQaRT ET ra
What isthe diference between Ad) Interim and Acting Appointment?
as yet |
—— T, 5
Vag interim Appointment ‘Acting Appoinimént
pent in-cheracter until “Ti It is temporany in nature and is @
disapproged}bysthe Commission on stop-gap. intended to fill
adjournment an-office, fo ited time until
of a permanent
2 Eo the Commission \ occupa ‘the office;
‘on Appointments for confirmation of =ThEse are not submitted to the
rejection; and oe Commission on Appointments.
3. These appointments are extended only ‘Acting appointments are a way of
0 UT - (oak oat (y" important
3. They may be extended any time
there is a vacancy.
(Pimentel vs. Ermita, G.R. No. 164978)
When may Congress grant the President emergency powers?
. There must be a war or other emergency;
1
2. The delegation must be fora limited period only;
|. The del
The delegation must be subject to such restrictions as the Congress may prescribe;
Page 3 of 8THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF UTOPIA
Political Law Tips
Bar Operations 2022
‘The emergency powers must be exercised to carry out a national policy, as declared
by Congress. (David v. Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396)
What is the operative fact doctrine?
It recognizes the existence and validity of @ legal provision prior to its being declared as
unconstitutional and hence, legitimizes otherwise invalid acts done pursuant thereto because
of considerations of practicality and faimess. (Film Development Council v. Oriente Group of
Theaters, G.R. No. 203754)
203754) ge
What are the'groimds forthe Void-1or-Vaguenéss)Doctrine? \
4 ‘AY
1. Tt violates due process for failure to accord persOfs, especially the parties targeted by
IE falrnotice of what conduct to avoid;and =
oe ne et Macare an unbridled discretion in carrying out its provisions and
Te leaves (a enforcer “flexing. ofthe government -muscle—(Romualdez v.
Sonciganbayan, GAR. NO. 152259) nS
are”
a 5 ,
In the furtherance of Governmental purpose; the means.employed sweep unnecessarily broad
and thereby invade the area Ghprotected freedom. It has @ special application only to free
speech cases. (Estrada) vy, Sandlganayen, GR. ‘No. 148560) ©
hat isthe overifgadth Doctrine?
ney =
Differentiate amongiClear and Present Dangef rest" terest Test, and
the Dangerous Tendency Test. , /p 4
t a Of Ly, .
| Bangerous Tendency
Clearjand Piésent Danger lancingcof Interes
There Is substantial danger] Used as a standard when Rermits limitations oh speech
that the $pedch.will likely Jead courts, need to balance] ance a rational connection
to an evil the government fias| conflicting social values) has been‘ _established
2 right to prevent, “This! rule | and” individual interests, | between - the / speech
requires that, the evil and requires a conscious |trestrainéd and the danger
Sought "tombe | and detailed consideration | contemplated,
must~ __ be | ofthe interplay of interests “
observable in a given |=
What are valid warrantless
1 Sete oF Fe idéfit To & Ls st (Ri je > >. 13);
tee IT = OT ZO
3. Search Of. fovinig ide;
4. Consented warrantless search (Caballes v. CA, G.R. No. 136292);
5. Customs search (Padilla v. CA, G.R. No. 121917);
6. Stop and Frisk (Malacat v. CA, G.R. No. 123595); and
7. Emergency and Exigent Circumstances. (People v. De Gracia, G.R. No. 102009-10)
Page 4 of 8THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF UTOPIA
Political Law Tips
Bar Operations 2022
May information from a confidential informant be the sole basis for a finding of
probable cause for warrantless searches and seizures?
No, Law enforcers cannot act solely on the basis of confidential or tipped information. A tip is
still hearsay no matter how reliable it may be. It is not sufficient to constitute probable cause
in the absence of any other circumstance that will arouse suspicion. (People v. Sapla, G.R-
No. 244045)
nd Local
T=An ordinanee!is enacted
2. The taking is for public us
or welfare, of for the,be
ppoot and the landless;
Payment of jusbeompen
Valid,.and definite offer) f
ANY public use must
sneficial enjoyment of tHe property
aha. Ls 20620)
statements that the rule begins
Differentiate between the right to a speedy trial and right to speedy disposition of
———B Dded UT sO dosdalrese
Te may only be invoked in criminal prosecutions [If cases may be invoked before any
against courts of law. tribunal, whether judicial or quasi-
Judicial. Accused must already be
prejudiced by the proceeding for the
right to be invoked.
(Catamco v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 243560-62)
Page 5 of 8THE
it
May anjaccused be:charged by both an ordinance and a statute arising from the
j
same ai
No. The
constitu
have ari
Disting}
and Wi
hy fo ~
ithtion dl cs facainst'Gouble jeapardyis avaliable so long as the acts which
have givenyriselto the first offense under the ordinance are the same acts which
to the, offenses charged undepthe statutel(PEople v. ne R. No. L-45129)
among the Wit of Habeas erp wo Ampato, i of Kallkasan,
Rpisas Data. ‘a
eS ;
Grounds ¢
wet rh
| 2. Rightful custady of any person is withheld from the person entitled
1. There exist a\case of illegal confinement or detention where 2
person is deprived of his or her liberty; or
Do theretoa(RoC, Rule 102, Sec.1) yg
writ The violation arises from an unlawful act orsoffissionjof a public
Amparo, reer ‘or employee,-or-of a private indivi ity; and
sshall cover Seen ce lisappearances
en No, 07-09-12-SC)
ans woe fhe We eyed ser gg o
csi rtien.
Writ of orem rivate individ 5 eng; and
Kalikasan Jon i rt F will lea rental damage of
p itu préfudica phe, 1 ‘or property of
1. Atlshdehreate gaa constiutional right t0 @
balanced andt Foe) yi
2, The vation sas from an unlawful act or omission of a public
innabfants in two or more cies or provinces, (International Service
v. Greenpeace, G.R. No. 209271)
Data
Writ of Habeas
1. It Is a remedy avallable whose right to privacy in life, liberty or
security is violated or threatened; and
2. The violation arises from an unlawful act or omission of a public
official or employee, or of a private individual or entity engaged in
the gathering, collecting or storing of data or information regarding
the person, family, home and correspondence of the aggrieved
party. (Vivares v. STC, G.R. No. 202666)
Page 6 of 8TH
a
who are considered as Filipino Citizens?
citizenship ‘upon reaching
4. Those who are ean a
E FRATERNAL orp) P :
Political Law Tips
Bar Operations 2022
of majority; and
‘naturalized in accordance with law. (PHIL CONST. Art IV. Sec. 1)
Distinguish,between-an-Election Protes
it
eas om
and a Quo Warranto, procendis-
ti
Election Protest [
D7 Quo Warranto!\
winning cani
fates based on grounds
office. “er
Strictly @ contest between the defeated-and
election frauds or~irregularities~as~to~ who
actually obtained the majority of the’ legal
votes and therefore’ is jentitled to iigld the
Refers to questions of disloyalty oF
ineligibility of the public official or franchise
holder.-It-is'@ proceeding to unseat the
incligibleeperson”tromiiotfiee, but not to
install the protestantin place.
of
ibaa
GE 1x
iF
Can only be filed bya candidate who has duly
filed a certificate of candidacy and has. been’
‘Cap be filed-by any voter.
seated|in the office/vacated. » ‘ar a
z co ppm Peers
4 \
: ct]
wank
TC
Distinguish between amendments,and revisions to the Constitution.
(okIn-y, COMELEC, GR: "i 17943132)
revision
Re~sul
’
TL» Revision a
Definitign [males a change what alters a | Refers to a Change that adds, reduces, or
basic principle in the Constitution, | deletes, without. altering fthe basic
ike “altering the principle of | principle involved. Generalifi affects only
powers—or the
f checks and balances. -
a if the
specific provision.”
How
proposed | upon a vote of % oj
How
members or a Constitutional
2022 UT
, MayesB proposed directly by
Congress, upon a vote of % of all its
members; or
2. Through
cor
calling of a
nd) Edpvention — which
s the vote of % of all members
of Congress,
3. May also be proposed by the people
through initiative upon petition of at
least 12% of total number of
registered voters, of which every
legislative district must be
represented by at least 3% of the
ratified
revision,
Ratified by a majority of votes
cast in plebiscite after approval of
registered voters therein.
Ratified by a majority of votes cast in
plebiscite after approval of amendment
by Congress.
Page 7 of 8
=‘Amendments proposed through people's
initiative shall be ratified by majority of
votes cast in plebiscite after certification
by Commission of Elections.
(Lambino v. COMELEC, GR. No. 174153)
What are the sources of International Law?
1, Ipternational conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly
recognized by the contesting States; j
2. International custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;
3. General principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
4. Judicial decisions; and .
5. The teachings of the mast highly qualified publicists of the various nations (Statute
OF The International Court Of Justice, Art. 38 (1))
' “
Does the President hae the absolute power to unilaterally withdraw fram a treaty
or international agreement? =”
i vA
No. The President enjoys somesféeway in withdrawing from agreements which he determines
to be contrary to the Constitution or statutes, but he cannot unilaterally withdraW from such
agreements entered into, with the concurrence of the:Senate whichexpressly declared that
hy withdrawl mus'aso be made with Its concurencen(Pongiinan 4, Cayet r GR. No.
238875) i fal 4
When is the Precautionary Principle applicable? — F
ab i HK -
rts appied i reselVng environmental cases when the causal link between hyman activity
and an environmental effect cannot be established with certainty. Based on this principle, an
Uncertain scientific plausibility of serious and irreversible damage to the environment justifies
actions to avpid thet iy damage, (West Tower Condominium Corp. v. First Philippine
Industral Corp., GR. NO, 194239)
—— eae
Nee R +
= is,»
2022 UT - 0120
Page 8 of 8
You might also like
G.R. No. 143487 February 22, 2006 TOMMY FERRER, Petitioner, People of The Philippines, and Court of Appeals, Respondents
G.R. No. 143487 February 22, 2006 TOMMY FERRER, Petitioner, People of The Philippines, and Court of Appeals, Respondents
18 pages