An Algorithm For The Interception and Analysis of Pulse Compression Radar Signals by Digital Receiver
An Algorithm For The Interception and Analysis of Pulse Compression Radar Signals by Digital Receiver
An Algorithm For The Interception and Analysis of Pulse Compression Radar Signals by Digital Receiver
Abstract
Pulse Compression is an Electronic Protection (EP) technique being used in the modern radars to achieve the advantages of a
good range resolution and target detection capability at low power levels and simultaneously offering Low Probability of
Intercept (LPI) features. Pulse Compression Radars are being integrated into the many platforms and weapon systems of the
modern battlefield. The Detection and analysis of pulse compression radars demand ELINT Receiver with very high sensitivity
and capability to extract inter and intra pulse modulation parameters. In this paper, Digital Receiver, a state of the art single
board solution for the detection and analysis of modern radar signals in real time is presented. A novel algorithm based on the
All Phase FFT is being implemented successfully in the Digital Receiver Hardware in real time making the system useful for
both the ES/ELINT applications. The Algorithm is capable of extracting all the basic as well as advanced parameters of
frequency and phase modulations such as Chirp, Barker, and Poly-phase codes. The paper describes various pulse compression
radar waveforms and thoroughly discusses the proposed Digital Receiver Hardware and implementation of signal processing
algorithms for the interception and analysis of complex pulse compression radar signals. The simulated and measured test data
for various digitally modulated radar signals is presented. This type of receiver plays a vital role in the modern battlefield for
ES/ELINT application.
Keywords: LPI- Low Probability of Intercept, ELINT-Electronic Intelligence; ES-Electronic Support, FPGA- Field
Programmable Gate Array, EW-Electronic Warfare, apFFT-All Phase FFT
receives IF input in the frequency range of either 160±20 further the exact subtype within the modulation i.e. Barker,
MHz (140 to 180 MHz) or 1000 ±250MHz (750 to 1250 Frank, Poly-phase etc., can be determined.
MHz). The inputs are amplified and filtered to eliminate any
spurious signals with a gain of 12dB to meet the input power
level requirements of ADC which is present on the main
board.These signals are fed to ADC which operates at 1350
MHZ sampling rate.
3.1 All Phase FFT: All Phase FFT [4] is an algorithm which
overcomes the disadvantages of conventional FFT based
algorithm and achieves the high accuracy phase measurement
Figure 1: Digital Receiver Hardware without the need for spectrum correcting operations. Also,
All Phase FFT is superior to conventional FFT in inhibiting
The sampled data will be fed to Virtex-6 SX-475 FPGA. the spectral leakage.
The FPGA receives the sampled data in real time for signal
processing using the advanced algorithm based on All Phase
FFTand to compute/process the signal parameters. The
Hardware has two TS-201 DSP’s for further processing. The
output of the FPGA is fed through a 51 pin ‘D’ Connector for
debug and also through VME connectors to ESM processor
card for further processing. The algorithm that is being
implemented inside the Digital Receiver Hardware is
discussed below.
19
International Journal of Darshan Institute on Engineering Research and Emerging Technology
Vol. 2, No. 2, 2013, pp. 18-22
, , , is selected as an
example to compare the traditional DFT phase spectrum with
apDFT phase spectrum.
(5)
Figure 4. All Phase FFT Spectrum Analysis-Example
Calculation
From Equation (4) and Equation (5), we can find that the
The implementation shown above is an optimum phase value of traditional FFT spectrum X(k) has a close
implementation which makes apFFT applicable and relationship with its counterpart frequency offset ‘(β-k) Δω’.
convenient to be implemented [5]. ‘wc’ introduced in Figure On the contrary, the phase value of apFFT spectrum Y(k) is
4 is named as ‘convolution window’, which equals the constantly equal to the initial phase �0, independent of the
convolution of one ‘front window f’ and one reversed "back frequency offset ‘(β-k)Δω’.Moreover, the ‘�0’ is exactly
window b ",that is equal to the theoretic phase value of the (2N-1)-length input
data vector’s central sample ‘x (0)’.In conclusion, having
w (n) = f (n) * b(n) (1) implemented apFFT on the (2N-1) input data, we can directly
obtain the central sample’s theoretic phase value from the
According to Equation (1) peak spectral line without any additional correcting
operations. Thus we say that apFFT possesses the property of
‘phase invariant’.
(2) 3.2 Simulation of All Phase FFT Algorithm: MATLAB
simulation has been carried out on sinusoidal signal to clearly
view the working principle of All Phase FFT and to compare
If RN represents the N-length rectangular window, then it against the No Window and Windowed FFT. The
apFFT can be classified in 3 categories: The case that simulation results for this have been shown in the Figures
satisfies f= b=RN is called no-windowed apFFT; The case 5(a) and 5(b).
that satisfies f or b = RN is called single windowed apFFT
and The case that satisfies f =b ≠ RN is called dual-windowed
apFFT. The FFT used for basic parameter measurement
above refer to the case of All Phase FFT with no window.
(3)
distinguish one LPI radar signal from another and they are
required for effective exploitation. After getting all the
parameters the signal is being classified according to the
database and the corresponding signal type and the basic as
well as advanced parameters are being sent as the Pulse
Descriptor Word (PDW).The algorithm flow is being shown
in figure 6.
21
International Journal of Darshan Institute on Engineering Research and Emerging Technology
Vol. 2, No. 2, 2013, pp. 18-22
The types of the signals and the Intra pulse modulation The ELINT Digital Receiver presented in this paper is an
parameters that can be obtained with the above algorithm are advanced ES/ELINT receiver for the detection and analysis
shown in Table 1. of modernPulse Compression Radar signals. The Algorithm
embedded in the hardware is capable of extracting all the
Table 1: Effectiveness of Custom Algorithm basic as well as advanced parameters of the phase as well as
Parameter Design Goal Design frequency modulated Intrapulse Radar Signal. The system of
Achievements this kind which is able to extract the basic as well as
advanced parameters of the radar signal in real time plays a
Type of Chirp, Barker, Chirp, Barker, very crucial role in estimating the enemy radar signals and in
Signals Frank, Frank,P1-P4 effectively countering the associated threats.
P1-P4
References
Parameters Centre Centre Frequency,
of Chirp Frequency, Chirp Bandwidth, 1. Uri Barkan&Shuki Yehuda, “Trends in Radar and
Signals Chirp Chirp Rate Electronic Warfare Technologies and their Influence
Bandwidth, on the Electromagnetic Spectrum Evolution ”, 2012
Chirp Rate IEEE 27th Convention of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers in Israel, pages 5 2012
Phase Sub Code Sub Code 2. Philip E Pace, “Detecting And Classifying LPI
Modulation Duration, Phase Duration, Phase Radar”, Second Edition, Artech House, Inc.,
Parameters Pattern, Type of Pattern, Type of Norwood, Massachusetts, 2009.’
Phase Code Phase Code 3. “The Fundamentals of Signal Analysis".,
Application Note No 243,Agilent Technologies.
www.agilent.com/find
Table 2: Extracted Phase Patterns for Barker and Frank Code 4. WANG Zhaohua, HouZhengxin and Su Fei, “All
phase FFT spectrumanalysis, "Journal of China
Institute of Communications, Vol. 24, No. 11A, Nov
2003, pp. 16-19.
5. Huang Xiangdong and Wang Zhaohua, “Phase
Difference Correcting Spectrum Method Based on
All-phase Spectrum Analysis,” Journal of
Electronics & Information Technology, Vol. 30, No.
2, Feb 2008, pp. 293-297.
6. Guo Jing, Li Nan, Zhou Zhou, Yi Wei, XuXin,
Wang Yinan, “A Novel Digital Demodulation
Method for MFEIT based on APFFT”, International
Table 2 shows the output phase of a Barker and Frank code Conference on Intelligent System Design and
that are being extracted with the custom algorithm. It is also Engineering Application, 2010 IEEE,DOI
observed that the phase error is within ±5˚, which is sufficient 10.1109/ISDEA.2010.239.
to extract all the poly-phase modulations. 7. BeateHoehne, Germany , “Digital Up Conversion
VS IQ modulation using a wideband Arbitrary
6. Conclusion Waveform Generator”, 978-1-4673-0700-
0/12©2012 IEEE.
Biographical notes
A.K. Singh completed M.E. in Digital System (ECE) from Osmania University in 2003. He joined Defence Electronics Research Laboratory
(DLRL) in 1996. Currently he is Scientist-‘F’ and leading a team working on design & development of real time Digital Receiver. His area of
interest includes high speed board design, Time-frequency signal processing, and EW Receiver design.
Dr. K SubbaRaohas Graduated from S V University, Tirupati, India. He obtained the Master’s and Ph.D. degree from Osmania University
(O.U), Hyderabad, India. He Joined Osmania University in 1981 as lecturer and served as a headed the ECE department. He has published more
than 200 research papers in national and international Journals/ conferences. His current interests include signal processing for Radar & Spread
spectrum applications and Bio Medical signal processing.
22