[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
398 views42 pages

Mannerism in Renaissance Architecture

Mannerism emerged in the late 15th century as architects and artists experimented with breaking from classical norms established by Bramante and Raphael. Two key figures were Giulio Romano, who represented subversion of classical forms, and Giacomo da Vignola, who represented maintaining authority through classical motifs. The lecture discusses Mannerism through the works of these two architects, focusing on five case studies of 16th century buildings including Palazzo Massimo alle Colonne designed by Baldassare Peruzzi. Mannerist works are characterized by complex compositions with ambiguous overlapping elements and shallow space rather than the harmonious deep perspective of High Renaissance architecture.

Uploaded by

de-k
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
398 views42 pages

Mannerism in Renaissance Architecture

Mannerism emerged in the late 15th century as architects and artists experimented with breaking from classical norms established by Bramante and Raphael. Two key figures were Giulio Romano, who represented subversion of classical forms, and Giacomo da Vignola, who represented maintaining authority through classical motifs. The lecture discusses Mannerism through the works of these two architects, focusing on five case studies of 16th century buildings including Palazzo Massimo alle Colonne designed by Baldassare Peruzzi. Mannerist works are characterized by complex compositions with ambiguous overlapping elements and shallow space rather than the harmonious deep perspective of High Renaissance architecture.

Uploaded by

de-k
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Lecture15:Renaissance Lecture 15: Renaissance Mannerism

AuthorityandSubversion Giulio Romano/GiacomodaVignola 1520 1520 1580

WhatisMannerism?
FormostoftheCinquecento,mostoftherestofthe16th century,(mainly after1520)awrestlingbetweenfurthercodifyingtheclassicalnorms establishedbyBramanteandhisschool(Raphael,Peruzzietc.)intheearly partofthecentury:i.e.robust,Roman,monumental,sculpturalspaceand wallsurfaces,liketheTempietto,likeSantaMariadellaConsolazioneinTodi p andbreakingtherules,varyingtheforms,willfully,orplayfully Ideaofbothauthorityandsubversion
perColinRowe,LeonSatkowski,ItalianArchitectureofthe16th Century

Definition (PerJamesCurl,ClassicalArchitecture)

Mannerism:Astyleof16th centuryarchitecturecharacterizedby M i A l f 16 hi h i d b theuseofclassicalmotifsoutsidetheirnormalcontext,orinawillful orillogicalmanner.ItwastheprecursoroftheBaroque,andis generallyassociatedwithItalianarchitecturefromthetimeof Michelangelountilthebeginningofthe17 century. Michelangelo until the beginning of the 17th century
(Curl,glossary,p199)

Afurtherlookatthis twodifferenttakes: PeterMurray: TheArchitectureoftheRenaissance(1963)


Mannerism,asatermwasinventedsomesixtyyearsago whenitbecameclearthatthepurelyclassicalstyleof when it became clear that the purely classical style of Bramante,RaphaelandPeruzziatthebeginningsoftheir careerswasnotthesameinintentionasthestylepracticed byGiulioRomanoorevenbyRaphaelandPeruzziintheir lateryears.Similartendenciescanbefoundinpaintingand insculpture,perhapsmostnotablyinRaphaelslatework suchastheTransfiguration (intheVatican).Inallthreearts such as the Transfiguration (in the Vatican) In all three arts thisnew,restless,stylewasduetoanumberoffactorsof whichthemostimportantwerethepersonalityof Michelangeloandthefactthattheclassicalstyleof BramanteandtheearlyRaphaelmusthaveseemedto youngermenadeadend.Itmusthaveappearedtothem thatnothingcouldbedoneonthoselineswhichwouldbe h hi ld b d h li hi h ld b betterthantheworkalreadyinexistence,soratherthantry torivalBramantesTempiettoorRaphaelsSchoolofAthens thesensiblethingtodoseemedtobetotrytofinda different,moreexcitingstyle.Inarchitecturethemere p yp q p imitationofclassicalprototypeswasnowquitesimpleandit seemedworthexperimentingwiththeclassicalvocabulary inordertofindnewcombinationsthatmightyieldresults visuallyassatisfactoryasanythingthathadcomedown fromantiquity.
(Murraypp145146)

RaphaelTransfigurationof Christ (c15161520),Vatican:


Lastmasterpiece,finishedbyGiulio Romano,hisassistant combines Romano his assistant combines formalpolishandelegancew/ anatmosphereoftension inits feelingandcompositionit inauguratedthemannerist ( y p movement(Encyclopedia Britannica)

FrederickHartt: TheHistoryofItalianRenaissanceArt(1987) Th Hi f I li R i A (1987) WhereasthecontentofHighRenaissanceartisoftenideal,Manneristartoften choosessubjectsthatareabnormalorunnatural,andthestrangeand unexpectedaspectofasubjectmaybeemphasized.Manneristinterpretations unexpected aspect of a subject may be emphasized Mannerist interpretations sometimesstressuncontrolledemotionorwithdrawal.InHighRenaissanceart thenarrativewillusuallybedirect,compactandcomprehensible;inMannerist artitisoftenelaborate,involved,andobtuse.(appliesmainlytopainting) Whil WhilespaceinHighRenaissanceworkwillbemeasured,harmoniousand i Hi h R i k ill b d h i d ideal,Manneristspacecanbedisjointed,spasmodic,and/orlimitedtothe foregroundplane. High Renaissance compositions are harmonious and integrated, they are often HighRenaissancecompositionsareharmoniousandintegrated,theyareoften centralized,andtheymayassumeapyramidalorconicalform(e.g.ideal centralizedchurches SantaMariadellaConsolazione);Mannerist compositionsmaybeconflicting,andformsoftenseektheframeorviolateit Whil Hi h R WhileHighRenaissanceproportionsarenormativeandidealized,Mannerist i ti ti d id li d M i t proportionscanbeuncannonical,usuallyattenuated.
(seeHarttp589)

But,significantly theconceptofMannerismalsoverymuchapartof current,contemporarydialogueinmodern architecturetheory,especially current contemporary dialogue in modern architecture theory especially overthepast40+years: Robert Venturi: Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture (1966) RobertVenturi:ComplexityandContradictioninArchitecture(1966) representingtheGrays Postmodernists ColinRowe:Transparency:LiteralandPhenomenal (twoarticlespublishedin Perspecta in1964,1971) representingtheWhites theNeoModernists, theNewYorkFive Ri h d M i P t Ei th N Y k Fi RichardMeier,PeterEisenmanetal. t l

Thedesireforacomplexarchitecture,withits attendantcontradictions,isnotonlyareactionto tt d t t di ti i t l ti t thebanalityorpettinessofourcurrent architecture.Itisanattitudecommoninthe Manneristperiods:thesixteenthcenturyinItaly ortheHellenisticperiodinClassicalarttoday g f thisattitudeisagainrelevanttothemediumof architectureandtheprograminarchitecture.


(Venturi,ComplexityandContradictioninArchitecture p19) Coverimagew/MichelangelosPortaPia C i / Mi h l l P t Pi

Redundantelements:more thanoneelementdoesthe worknecessary: flatarch + decoratedlintel+pediment d dl l d above tospanopening, Exaggeratedelements: keystonelargerthanitneeds tobe,pedimentmuchlarger to be pediment much larger thanarch,whichisflatand turneddown toform rusticatedsidesoftheportal jambs,andcutoffatthetop Juxtaposedelements: scrolls,garlands,pilasters, rusticatededges,broken roundedpedimentinsideof triangularpediment all mixedup,overlappedontop i d l d t ofeachother.
(seeComplexityandContradiction p62)

MichelangelosPortaPia,Rome,1568 PerVenturi:ContradictionJuxtaposed from ComplexityandContradiction

ScottG Gilchristphoto

andColinRowe welllookattheconceptof16th centuryMannerismthroughhiseyesaswell

Hoeslip34

Bauhaus(WalterGropius) cornerdetail: corner detail: LiterallyTransparent all glass,canseerightthrough:

Analogoustodeep, perspectivalspace perspectival space

VillaStein(LeCorbusier) frontfaade: Phenomenally Transparent very little actual glass Phenomenally Transparent verylittleactualglass, butvariouslayers,planes,stackedclosetogetherin shallowspace (thenextexampleshouldmakethismoreapparent)

Analogoustomannerist Analogous to mannerist space?

Hoeslip45

perthiskindofanalysis: RichardMeiersBarcelonaMuseumhasmanyofthelayeringqualitiesthata faadelikeMichelangelosSanLorenzohas bothcouldbeconsidered phenomenallytransparent,bothcouldbeconsideredManneristworks?

Harttp5 551

SanLorenzoFaadeProject: Ambiguous,overlappinglayers w/inshallowspaceofframe, grid

BarcelonaMuseumfacade: 1. ManneristasalateversionofearlierHigh CorbusianModernism like16th Century MannerismistoBramante 2. Manneristinthesesenseofvariousambiguous overlappinglayersinshallowspace vs.clear, unambiguousopening,liketheBauhaus unambiguous opening like the Bauhaus

Meierp3 32

Harttp572

RossoFiorentinoDescent R Fi ti D t fromtheCross(1521)

RaphaelSchoolofAthens(15101511) R h l S h l f Ath (1510 1511)

PerRowe paintingcomparisonshouldhelpmaketheseideasmorevivid,clear DeepperspectivalspaceofAthensvs.shallow,closeupspaceofDescent pp p p p p Swirling,agitatedmotionofDescentvs.calm,serenity,clarityofAthens Thisverymuchalsoseen(asRowepointsout)intheSistineChapelceilingby Michelangelo,thatwelookedatlasttime M Mannerist panel/gridwilllookforexamples i t l / id ill l k f l

Harttp524

Willlookmainlyat(5)CaseStudies examplesof16th centuryMannerism: PalazzoMassimoalleColonne,Rome BaldassarePeruzzi,1534 PalazzoSpada,Rome,architectunclearbutbasedonsketchforasimilar buildingbyRaphael,mid16th century Palazzo Te Mantua Giulio Romano 1527 1534 PalazzoTe,Mantua GiulioRomano,15271534 VillaGiulia,Rome GiacomodaVignola,15501555 PalazzoFarnese,Caprarola alsobyVignola,1159
Afewotherexamplestoemphasize,orclarifysomepoints butthese(5)buildings,eachin A few other examples to emphasize or clarify some points but these (5) buildings each in theirownwaysexemplifytheideaswevejusttalkedabout:

Inparticular twokeyarchitects: GiuilioRomano(Giuilio) b14991546 representssubversion GiacomodaVignola(Vignola) b1507 1573 representsauthority

Sc cottGilchristphoto

Plan showinginterconnectionof twoadjacentbuildingsona complicatedsitefortheMassimi brothers PalazzoMassimo,onright brothers Palazzo Massimo on right ArchitectoftheVillaFarnesina Massimoasthecontextual Palazzo

PalazzoMassimoalleColone,Rome,BaldassarePeruzzi,1534 P l M i ll C l R B ld P i 1534

M Murrayp164

Mannerist?InRobertVenturissenseofcomplexityandcontradiction building takesidealform(comparetotheVillaFarnesina)andmoldsitselftothesite. ColonnademarksgroundfloorentrylevelrathertypicalemphasisonPianoNobile Nohorizontalstringcoursestomarkmainfloordivisionsorclassicalorders appliedtoupperlevels actualreadingoffloordivisionsunclearfromfaade Unusualhorizontallyorientedwindowsw/ornamentalframes(strapwork)

ScottGilchristphoto

Fromme elp153

Courtyardview showingtheclear tripartitedivisionofthefloors obscuredonthefrontfaade b d h f f d

Colonnadeatentryvestibule

Fromme elp153

Mannerist inthemoststraightforwardway? Surfacedecorationemphasizedoverallelse overjustclearlymarking thelogicofthefaadeorganization(i.e.justmarkingthefloorlevelsw/ stringcourses,likethePalazzoMedici)oroverdisplayingthemasteryof i lik h P l M di i) di l i h f theclassicalorders,(e.g.BramantesPalazzoCaprini) Still behinditall,lookslikethewellproportionedlanguageofthe HighRenaissance
h PalazzoSpada,Rome mid16th century

Sco ottGilchrest

Sc cottGilchrestphoto

PalazzoSpada elevation

Frommelp120

ScottGilch hrist

BasedondesignforRaphaelsPalazzo g f p Branconio nolongerexisting

Detail atsurfacedecoration verylight, refined

ScottGilchr rist

PalazzoTe Northelevation IfthePalazzoMassimorepresents(inVenturis terms) ContradictionAdapted PalazzoTe mightbeContradictionJuxtaposed a strongersetofcontradictions Symmetry broken everywhere Symmetrybrokeneverywhere Bayrhythmcompletelyuneven heavyhanded

PalazzoTe,Mantua,GiulioRomano (15271534)

PalazzoTe plan

Furnarip167

Harttp595

Insidethecourtyard lookingbacktoentryonnorthside(left)andwaytogarden(right)

CourtyardElevation:extremecontradiction,misalignmentetc.

Furnarip167

Beyondthedeliberate y games,architecturaljokes usefulasaprecedentinthe useofrustication

ScottG Gilchristphoto

Detailsateastcourtyardwall howmanythingscanyoufind wrong in this picture? Details at east courtyard wall how many things can you find wronginthispicture? Unevenbayrhythm Oversizedkeystone,windowarchjammedagainstbentupframe Twodifferentsizedcolumnssharesamebase Mostfamously droppedtriglyphinentablature

ScottGilchristphoto

Interior RoomofGiants skillsasan illusionisticpainter showingthecollapseofhis ownbuildingontopoftheviewerintheroom!

Detail walltextureatrustication

ScottGilchristpho oto

Harttp597

Finally themorestandardvestibule:spaceopenstowardsthegarden

Murrayp88

GiulioRomanosownhouse inMantua(1540s): Variationsonthethemeofrustication AdeliberateplayoffofthelogicofBramantesclassicismatPalazzoCaprini:1)string coursebentuptoformpedimentoverentry(vs.Bramantesstrictseparationof p f p y( p f upper/lowerlevels)2)upperwindowpedimentsburiedinniches inverseofBramante

Frommelp133

Frommelp128

PalazzoMaccarani(152223) court buildingnolongerexists

PalazzoMaccarani exterior

GiuiloRomanosotherdirection? Abstractionofclassicalorders Mannerist Abstraction of classical orders Mannerist grid,framethatColinRowespeaksabout: Thissortofapproachisseenmoreclearlyandin amorerefinedway intheworkofGiacomoda Vignola Vi l

VillaLante Vill L model actual building different. ff

Frommelp127

Frommelp128

Vi ignolaplate32

Vi ignolaplate3

TheOrders perVignola

Vignolascorniceinvention

Vignola onfrontispiece

GiacomoBarozzidaVignola(b15071573) publishedReguladelliCinqueOrdini dArchitectura TheCannonoftheFiveordersofArchitecture(1562) Firstfullywellillustratedtreatise measureddrawingsoftheordersandtheiruses (Albertisbookshadfewillustrations,Serlio,othermajortreatisewriter,butwasnota sophisticatedarchitect) Authority Vignolasrefinement foundationforFrenchclassicism ofthe17th,18th centuriesandbeyond(vs.Palladio'simpactonEnglish,laterAngloAmericanculture) t i db d ( P ll di ' i t E li h l t A l A i lt )

Vi ignolaplate1

Frommelp185

VillaGiulia aerialview ll G l l

Faadeengraving F d

VillaforPopeJuliusIII Axialcomposition elementsofsurprise:exteriormassing doesn treveal scooped out semicircular court doesnt reveal scoopedoutsemi circularcourt Onceinside progressionthrusitenotclearataglance Usesrustication(perGiuilio),butinarefined/restrainedway Layeringbuildsupcarefulemphasistowardscenter

VillaGiulia,Vignola(andothers),Rome,15501555

Planofresidence

ScottGilchrest

ScottGilchrest

RoweonVignola: Animportantaspectof Vignolasarchitectureis l h hisorchestrationofa flatsurfacewithan equallyflatapparatusof p pilastersandstripsso p thatevenwhenhe employselementsof robustnessanddepth, thesehavethequalityof stretchingthrougha stretching through a sortofhighlystretched membrane.Inother words,theirbehavioris eruptive.Anditmaybe said,withsome plausibility,thatifhis contemporaryPalladio was(andremains)the greatanalystofthe great analyst of the plan,Vignolawas equallythegreat VillaGiulia mainfacade protagonistofthe elevation.
(Stankowskip203)

Scott tGilchristphoto

Windowdetail

Rusticationatentry

Detailatniche

Facadecomposition

ScottGilc christ

Sco ottGilchristphotos

S ScottGilchrestphoto

Obliqueviewatlowerlevel

Windowstudy rusticationandframe playsoffof,envelopesframeitself: Manneristdetail

G Gromortp111

Insidethesemicircularcolonnade

framesandthinstrips thesemicircle

VillaGiulia sequenceofspacesthruthe site:

Sco ottGilchrestimages

Viewofthespace nowandasdesignedoriginallyw/decorativesurfacesinpanels View of the space now and as designed originally w/ decorative surfaces in panels

Sco ottGilchrest

Intotheloggia,theNymphaeum.anddown

Hiddenstairs downtothegrottobelow g

ScottGilchrestphotos

Sectionthroughthepentagonshapedfortress startedbyothers: Vignolasmostdramaticwork Exemplifies(best?)hislayered/gridded/flat builtupsurfacecompositionalmethod I Innersleeveatcourtyard l l d lowerthanfullheight h f ll h i h ofvolume:keytoitscomposition

AerialView

PalazzoFarnese,Caprarola,Italy Vignola from1559 Vignola from 1559

SitePlan Site Plan

Lodzp114

Fromm melp187

Murray yp228

Caprarola Viewtowardsmainentry

S ScottGilchrestphoto

Upperlevel:flatpilastersonframedlayer anelevationofbuiltupflat surfaces/thinprofiles

ScottGilchrestphoto

Scott tGilchrestphoto

Rusticationatentry envelopesframe Similarly:flatlayeringsystemat ofDoricorder butw/agreatdealof lowerlevels:archascutoutinlattice, finesse! grid pilasterslayeredontop

Scott tGilchrestphoto

Bramante PalazzoCaprini p

Vignola innersleeveofcourtyard:schemea variationonBramante? variation on Bramante?

ScottGilchr restphoto

AsintheVillaGiulia,Vignolaapproaches Caprarolasverticalsurfaceswitha Michelangelostylesensibilityandthen g y y proceedstoarticulatetheirsurfaceand depth.Thewallhasbecomeatopicfor anatomicaldissectionlayersare g graduallysubtractedandcutaway y y (Rowe Stankowskip220)

Harttp502

Detailviewsatwallsurfaceatcourtyard
ScottGil lchrestphoto ScottGil lchrestphoto

Viewofcourtyardstair Andinsideofvestibule(similartoVilla Giulia)


Scot ttGilchrestphoto

Har rttp689

LegacyofVignola:

First: Thesensibilityof Michelangelo, simplified,made accessible,usable?

FaadebyAmmanati PalazzoFirenze,Rome(1572)

Frommelp1 195

IleGesu:asbuilt,per GiacomodellaPorta
Frommel lp191

Second:Thedevelopmentofthe Baroquefaade willreturntothis themeafternextweek th ft t k

ScottGilchrist

IleGesu:Vignolasdesign

KPFMono ographp138

KohnPedersenFox SaintPaul Companies,(19871991)

KohnPedersenFox ABCStudios,New York(19841986)

third,andstillcurrently: thecontinuingapplicationofVignolalikesensibility

Process8 86p45

Pr rocess86p62

KohnPedersenFox 500EStreetSW,Washington,DC(198487) ofalltheRenaissancearchitectswithwhomaconnectionwithKPFmightbemade, VignolaisthebestparallelVignolaisimportantforthreereasons.Firsthisflatness;heis theleastplasticandleastrobustofthesixteenthcenturyarchitectsSecondhisutility;the easeofwhichhissystemwasdisseminatedthroughoutEuropeandlaterAmerica.Third, andmostimportant,thewayhe(likeGiulio)begantoabstracttheliteralformsofthe classicalvocabularyintomoregeneric,decorative,nonspecificelements.


(ThomasSchumacher:TheFacadesofKPF:AbstractionandtheLimitsofFiguration, (Thomas Schumacher: The Facades of KPF: Abstraction and the Limits of Figuration KPFMonograph19861992)

Pr rocess86p63

Reading:
Required: Trachtenbergpp309325(ChapterEight:TheRenaissance),restof chapter LectureswillONLYfocusonpp299303and311319 outlineand discussiononFrishouldfocusonthesepages Supplemental: Kostofpp412420(Chapter17 sectiononMannerismandGiulioRomano) Kostofpp468483(Chapter18 sectiononVeniceandPalladio) Mainissues: Mannerism whatisit?Inwhatdifferentwayscanitbeseeninthe examplesshown? examples shown? Relatingtheconceptsandexamplesdiscussedtothefaadetermproject UnderstandingtheimportanceofPalladioswork

You might also like