Page 1 of 71

DYNAMIC THEORY OF THE AETHER

Vitor Matheus Izoldi Nogueira

Publish Date: 8/8/2024

 Page 2 of 71

Table of Contents

Preface…………………………………………………………………….….….……pg. 3-4
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..pg. 4-11
Relativity: My Perspective Alters Your Reality…..…..…..…………………………pg. 11-24
- Light Clocks: Glaring Errors & Dim Results.
- The Twin Paradox: Because I See You Move, You Age Slower.
- The Clock Paradox: Another Step Away From The Unified Field Theory.
- The Grandfather Paradox: Time Travel is Impossible.
- The Car/Ladder and The Garage Paradox
- Ehrenfest-Einstein Paradox
- Twin Frog Paradox: Leaps of Faith in the “Almighty” Observer Inertial Reference Frame.
- Light Clocks: Glaring Errors & Dim Results.
Quantum Mechanics: Is Matter All That Matters?……………….……….…….…pg. 24-35
- Heisenberg Principle; Are There No Absolutes?
- Mass-Energy Equivalence
- The Wave-Function Collapse: No Wave-Particle Duality.
- Gravity; The Glue That Binds Heliocentrism to Atomism, Is Water-Soluble.
- What is Light.
- The Double-Slit Experiment
Composition of the Aether Medium: Unifying All Manifestations of Energy.…..…pg. 38-41
- Unified Field Theory.
- The One Fundamental Force.
- Manifestations of Force.
Heliocentrism; The Soul-Lure System………………………………………………pg. 41-49
- NASA & Other International & Independent Space Organizations.
- Michelson & Morley Interferometry Experiments: The Aether Is Real; Earth is Stationary.
- Long-distance Infrared Photography.
- Long-Distance Line-Of-Sight Communications.
- High-Optical-Magnification Videography.
- The North Pole: The Land of a Million Names.
Anti-Gravity: No Crazier Than Flying Spiders……….….………………………….pg. 49-52
- Darwin’s Experiences with Ballooning Spiders.
- The Long Disproven Wind Hypothesis and The Case for Electrostatic Flight.
- The Alien Psyop: A Thick Veil Upon Ancient Human-Built, Earth-Nascent High Technology.
- The APG: Gravity As A Circuital-Current Potential Gradient.
- Swimming Up The Inverse Current; Anti-Gravity.
Free-Energy: Suppressed Despite Support & Simplicity……………………………..pg. 52-57
- Ancient Egyptian Pyramids: Megalithic Tombs Don't Bear Hieroglyphs.
- Other Major Megalithic Sites: The Global, Pre-Flood Highly Advanced Civilization.
- The Wardenclyffe Tower: Nikola Tesla Re-Discovers Single-Point Energy.
- The Skyscraper-Antenna Atmospheric-Electricity Hypothesis: Facts and Fiction.
Notable Quotes: Standing on the Shoulders of Giants…………………..……………pg. 57-59
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………..pg. 59-60
 Page 3 of 71

Preface
This work is a synthesis of functional aether theories produced in the 19th century by
pioneers in electrodynamics including Tesla, Russel, Steinmetz, Heaviside, and others. It dispels
the nihilistic, materialistic, and inherently atheistic theories which have held reign over middle
earth’s citizens entire cosmological and physical system for centuries; the heliocentric, atomistic,
and and relativistic theories from the time of Democritus to that of Lorentz and Einstein. The
mathematical and metaphysical conjugate theories of which stem from the experimental and
theoretical efforts of their predecessors; Faraday, Maxwell, Huygens, Newton, Ptolemy,
Aristotle, and Pythagoras. An exploration into suppressed, ancient, timeless advanced
cosmological concepts and metaphysical systems is also presented. It must be noted that prior to
approaching the content within this book, the reader must understand that a new physical and
cosmological model may only be presented, let alone accepted, after errors and shortcomings of
the current leading models are addressed. It is my hope that in this process, as the fat is trimmed;
uncertainties polished away, the absolute truth shall stand in its raw glory. This in turn renders
the formulation of a new model passive, as the outcome of reductionism always stands firm in its
foundations. All one must do is interpret it with discernment and without any preconceptions,
mental sedimentations, or other forms of prejudice. The conceptual principles of this work may
seem extraneous, extreme, or outright incorrect at times, but it is urged that the reader pay mind
to the experimental foundation of same, which herein stands before the former. Only through
juxtaposing theory and experience, while yielding to no mental autoimmunity that otherwise
inhibit one from pondering this information without external projections and preconceptions, will
the truth present itself. The reader must embrace their sense of rationality and logic. Once armed
with strong discernment and disinterestedness, one may begin to read this book. Avoid all
attachment, either to the ideas presented herein or to your own. Reading something that affirms
one’s set of beliefs and as a consequence understanding them deeply and hence becoming
intelligible in that material is to be intelligent. However, wisdom is a different crop to cultivate.
Intelligence, as wisdom requires the intake of new information. What must take precedent in the
latter is the abolition of the brick wall of ignorance that many of us hold between our hearts and
our minds; because to truly believe and inner-stand anything which contradicts and imperatively
overthrows one’s own beliefs, one must feel that change toward truth in their heart before they
even read the material. Are they not put off by its appearance or experience conflict when first
approaching it. Thus, when looking to entertain the ideas in this book, the reader should first
focus on the quantitative, empirical information laid out herein, so to dispel any baseless
preconceptions. Only subsequently should they interpret the qualitative, philosophical concepts.
This is so that an emphasis is placed on the importance of experimental data in the formulation
of theoretical hypotheses; something that, although impersonated far and wide as such, is not
common practice among high-ranking academic institutions and other organizational bodies of
knowledge of today. Most scientists now, as Tesla is quoted saying, are very smart, and may
think deeply, but they can’t clearly. They can compute complex integrals, differential equations,
and other arithmetic to describe theoretical phenomena, such as that of curved space,—of which
Tesla was an adamant critic— and despite being ultimately perplexed, even mesmerized by the
 Page 4 of 71

counter-intuitiveness and lack of experimental basis for that which they believe; as also evident
in many physics forums, university classrooms, and even lectures from so-called ‘experts’ in this
field, very few of today’s scientists can muster the willpower or philosophical tenure to question
it.
Introduction

The two pillars upon which modern physics stands are the gravitational and atomic
theories of relativity and quantum mechanics, respectively. It is an acknowledged fact that these
two are incompatible when reconciled and that both doctrines, along with the axioms from which
they are built, are self-negating and contra-logical when taken independently. Einstein’s theory of
relativity purports that time and space —reified as physical entities— can be warped for a
moving observer due solely to the perspective of a fixed observer watching them. By extension
of the same principle from which this mental experiment is based, it is claimed that the aether;
the electromagnetic field, does not exist, and that matter can shrink in the direction of its
movement and theoretically fully convert into its equivalent in energy, if it is traveling at a high
enough velocity. Modern scientific organizations, which have largely become un-scientific,
religiously dogmatic ’priesthoods’, still assert that matter traveling at the speed of light would in
fact entirely disappear in its spatial parameters, despite providing zero raw, physical
experimental or observational evidence to support the mathematical derivations upon which such
a statement is based. Should it not be imperative for a physical system of natural science to have
its foundations on exactly that; physical experiments conducted in the natural world? Why then
are the two most foundational theories which govern our understanding of the way in which the
world works solely supported by mathematical equations? Despite exhibiting beautifully
complex symmetry and consistency in and of themselves, the same cannot be said for their
application and representation to real-world phenomena. Mathematics is a language through
which we can express physical phenomena in a consistent and logical mechanical framework.
However, just as with any language, one can lie with it just as easily as one can tell the truth. The
power to assign forces and values to imaginary constants and invariant principles is a high
authority. A conceptual framework wherein every observer is given his own individual existence;
relativity’s first principle, wherein each existence is itself composed of individual particles and in
which gravity is the curvature of space-time. Purely atomistic in every sense; all realities are
separate from one another (there is no common ground as someone’s truth is not the same as
another’s; no universal frame of reference), and within each relativistic reality every ‘thing’ is
composed of separate particles (unconnected by a universal medium to sustain their vibrations
and undulations). This has been the foundational scientific knowledge that is instrumental to
most high-energy scientific endeavors. If there are theoretical flaws, and the mathematics does
not reflect the true nature of experience, as will be amply referenced below, then the scientific
establishment faces a monumental apology, and debt to its millions of its unbeknownst misled
academic supporters and the general public both of which it is a servant for. Operations such as
the CERN L.H.C. or other scalar wave accelerators, as they should be called, must be ceased and
their directive reassessed in light of the content presented in further chapters on relativity, which
altogether asks the clear, concise, century-old question; “Which clock, according to the theory of
 Page 5 of 71

relativity, is the moving clock?” If this question cannot be answered, as it has remained for the
last hundred years since its inception, then there must be a flaw in not only relativity, but also,
the attitude of scientific endeavors especially those associated with prestigious universities and
organizations. In both of these faculties it is clear that physicists have subdued to
mathematicians. They take the equations as they are and because they work (in the framework
for which they were designed), experimental scientists, as they say, ’run with it’ or ‘plug &
chug’, unaware that the mathematics of relativistic physics and quantum mechanics do not reflect
or represent the real physical world. A lawsuit has been filed by a Hawaiian man against all
major particle accelerators and the associated manufacturers of giant electromagnets which the
former employ. The grounds for the lawsuit were that the work being done at such facilities
creates minuscule black holes and possibly dark matter, which could, as Mark Wagner exclaims,
swallow up the entire accelerator and consequently the earth. Though these concerns are not
entirely valid, as will be described further herein, they are not baseless. As expounded in the first
and second chapter, there are serious contradictions associated with Einstein’s special relativity
and quantum mechanical theories, respectively, which if ignored could pose a significant threat
to humanity. In the realm of high-energy physics there is no room for error; miscalculations and
the use of erroneous mathematics can result in unanticipated disasters the scale of which we are
not prepared for. The urgency of a paradigm shift in experimental science is so imperative that it
was arguably the main reason behind the publication of this book. That and of course my
relentless desire to dispel disinformation and dogma from the scientific community, of which I
am myself a part. These fallacious concepts have been engrained and established upon the upper
echelons of what used to be natural physics by scientific organizations such as the Royal Society,
the Smithsonian, and associated bodies of theoretical mathematicians for centuries. In Science at
the Crossroads, Herbert Dingle, now defamed as ‘fringe’ or ‘dissident’ scientist, was a university
lecturer, teacher, and writer of relativity and physics for over 50 years. At one point he realized
what he had been teaching was plagued with anomalies and outright contradictions —more than
just paradoxes—, and that it went against true reason and logic. [16] This is not an easy doctrine to
dispel, and the disinterested reader may have already departed, still, the content within this book
and in each of its chapters, which to my desire only briefly touch on matters any scientist of
today could agree constitute the most significant issues facing our scientific and societal
development, should stand on its own against criticism, because its center holds, and it is aligned
with experience; experimental observation. The information is laid out so that, in my hope, light
can be shed on the esoteric obscurities of modern physics revealing the truth that lies at the core
of the matter, plain and unprotected from preconceptions and prejudice; ready for the reader to
discern for themselves. As a society we have strayed from truths because the Aristotelian concept
of absolute truth has long been demonized by scientific institutions, which used to be conjunct
with religious institutions, and which have since stood for nihilistic and atheistic ideas, saturating
the world with concepts like relative truths and that matter is composed of solid particles, now
dubbed probability clouds. Relativity grants god-like powers to observers through inferring that
they are reference points from which the laws of nature may be measured. This as stated is not
just a nihilistic, but satanic ‘do as thou wilt’ doctrine which has fully driven the organizations
which are meant to search for and disclose truth to the public into assembly-line propaganda and
disinformation machines. Something must be done to allow the true scientific method to reign in
 Page 6 of 71

the realm of academia as it once did. This is an open letter to all scientists and natural inquirers
with an open mind to dismiss dogma, and phenomenologically suspend all preconceived notions
on cosmology, physical science, metaphysics, and ontology, so to allow the content herein to
speak and stand for itself.

There is a notable distinction between mathematics which explains and is derived from
experience; experimental observations in the physical world, and that which is conjured up
independently of same and then ingeniously re-associated with physical and metaphysical
attributes of reality despite never seeing them manifesting as physical phenomena. The curvature
of space and time and the equivalence of mass and energy are possible in arithmetic by the
invariance of the rate of induction of all electromagnetic phenomena; ‘c’, the ‘speed of light’ is
now the universal reference frame and the pivot upon which time and matter can warp or bend
inversely to one another. Gravity in this system is seen as the curvature of the ‘fabric’ of space-
time; accounting for the motions of planets as well as the downward acceleration felt by all mass
on earth, and by extension, the attraction of all masses toward one another. Gravity is always left
out of atomic theories, but in this paper, on the path towards a true unified field theory, its vital
role in intermolecular and intramolecular dynamics is expounded upon. Gravity is not the
curvature of space-time, nor is it as Newton supposed; mutual-mass acceleration with respect to
density. These suppositions and the axioms which stem from them are erroneous and even in
strong violation of Newton’s laws of thermodynamics as well as the universal laws of nature.
The theories of relativity, gravity, and quantum mechanics admittedly lack basis in experimental
observation and true empiricism. They arose as strictly theoretical (mathematical thought-
experiments) and subsequently ‘verified’ through a deliberate misinterpretation of real-world
phenomena; as evident by the currently-accepted conclusions drawn from the interferometry,
double-slit, photoelectric, and Cavendish experiments of the eighteenth century.

Newton’s second law of thermodynamics states that energy cannot be created nor
destroyed, and the supposed big bang is essentially the creation of everything from nothing, by
no-one, acting strictly through entropy; purely random chance, and forming many trillions of
spinning spheres of fire, rock, gas and countless geomorphological compositions each of which
is arguably insignificant and of incomprehensibly obscured meaning in the grander scale. It is
said that there are suns that could fit millions of our suns inside. This is built on the assumption
that the sun is 93 million miles away. This assumption is also the reason for Erastothenes
interpretation of the curvature of the earth. Nikola Tesla is quoted criticizing the concept of
something coming from nothing, saying it is ‘just absurd’. The idea of a ‘pale blue dot’ is
indoctrinated upon the minds of the youth before they can even feed themselves. Heliocentrism
is highly distilled and ripened, ancient, pseudo-metaphysical nihilism, which stands on a
foundation of neo-atomism, relativism, and materialism. In essence, an entire universe was
fabricated upon the convention that light and matter are corpuscular and that matter, also being
comprised of indivisible quanta, is not itself made of the same unifying substance as light.
Substance is perhaps an erroneous term, because in ‘empty’ space, just as time, there are no
physical properties, and all physical attributes arising from the former and existing in the latter
 Page 7 of 71

are due to stress placed upon the universal field; the aether, which is as Nikola Tesla and many
other great natural scientists and field theorists have purported, a plenum; not a vacuum.

Atomism as first taught by Democritus in 450 B.C. was a system of belief wherein
everything that exists is that which can be quantified. He posed that all matter is comprised of
indivisible ‘atomos’ (literally “no-cut”); particles. Atomism is a facet of materialism. A hundred
years later around 350 B.C. Aristotle proposed that all matter is comprised of a combination of
earth, water, air, and fire. At this point, geocentrism was still widely accepted as fact, and
Aristotle developed a theory for the composition of heavenly bodies. He described them as being
of a quintessential nature and a sort of ‘fifth-element’. He likely also understood that all elements
are made of light. Atomism could never be accepted in a society which puts God is at the
epicenter of physics. However in 230 B.C. Greek astronomer and Mathematician Aristarchus of
Samos presented the first Heliocentric theory. He lived most of his life in Samos and died in
Alexandria, Egypt. This theory reigned on The late Greeks lived during a period of strong
digression; the Kali Yuga was still ripe with strife. He was able to put the Sun at the center of the
universe and was especially kin to the Neo-Babylonian descendants whose predecessors
ransacked and destroyed what was once Egypt rebuilt from truly ancient times, the golden times
of old, during which it was called Khemit/Kemet. Although Aristarchus received momentum and
support for his theories; likely due to the aristocratic position he was in, he lacked the
mathematical finesse and imperative to orchestrate such a deceit, and naturally it was
overthrown. It was Claudius Ptolemy, some three hundred years later, that dispelled heliocentric
nihilism from Alexandria; or at least warded it off for the next 1400 years. Ptolemy was rumored
to have been a citizen of Rome, but this is still under scrutiny. He was born from a Greek family
and lived in Egypt most of his life, where he published volumes such as his almagest, which was
not overthrown in the realm of science until the days of Copernicus.

Copernicus lived during the late 1400’s into the early 1500’s and worked as a Catholic
clergyman, astronomer priest, and mathematician; a true Jesuit priest of Science. He revived the
sun-worshipping heliocentric doctrine of Aristarchus, as well as introduced other ideas of his
own, which truly marked the beginning of this great work of deceit. It fooled many at the time,
who as per direct result of the Church, were uneducated and poor. Archimedes had purported that
Aristarchus’ theories proposed that the Earth rotated daily upon its own axis and that it revolved
around the Sun. While the pythagoreans held that earth rotated around a central fire. Then in the
late 1500’s Tycho Brahe, Danish astronomer and nobleman, once again placed the earth at the
center of the universe, with the sun and moon orbiting around it. He was also well known as an
alchemist and astrologer, and came up with various explanations for the movements of the
heavenly bodies. It was only in the early 1600’s that Galileo Galilei, now dubbed the ‘father of
modern physics’, impinged upon the upper echelons of academia the heliocentric and multi-
galactic universe doctrine. Or did he? He claimed to have discovered mountains on the moon
with his telescope, but craters on a heavenly body do not assert nor deny the existence of
physical space beyond the atmosphere. Physics after Galileo was never the same, and the
revolution he conjured, quite literally, was akin to the widespread recognition which Einstein
received for his theories. The work of Kepler and various other scientism Jesuit priests, usually
 Page 8 of 71

associated with secret orders, only furthered the system proposed by Galileo. Kepler was a
contemporary of Galileo and he published volumes on planetary motion; astronomy.

The ancients had advanced technological knowledge and capabilities which Tesla
uncovered once again as will be discussed in the closing chapters of this book. It is possible that
the moon reflects the firmament and that it is in fact smooth. Another possibly unrelated piece of
information is that there are roughly 9,000 craters on the moon and about 9,000 stars visible in
the sky to the naked eye (on both hemispheres; the full circumference of the celestial sphere).
Ancient depictions of the moon show it to be glossy and opaque, not rough and ‘geomorphous’
featuring craters and mountains, though the written records of this are few or hard to find, and
thus lacking in this respect. Another possibility is that the moon once held water, or that the
moon is a noble form of crystalized water. If the moon is composed of water frozen in a perfectly
symmetrical lattice, the fact that radiation emitted from it is cooling when compared to the
‘moon-shade’ can be easily reconciled. It is impossible to say for certain what the moon is
composed of because frankly we have not produced evidence for its composition. The moon
landings were very clearly staged as anyone that watches the remnants we have of the original
Apollo footage or looks at any of Nasa’s photos with with a keen eye can discern. More on this
in the heliocentrism chapter, nevertheless, it is clear that the moon’s light is different than the
sun’s light. Even in the case that the sun does in fact induce the moon’s light, the moon must be
endowed with an ability to transmute the sun’s heating energy into a cooling one.

There is evidence for a war/rebellion against The Creator (or however you refer to the
Intelligent Source of Absolute Goodness, Love, and Truth) circa 20,000-30,000 years ago. The
book of Enoch; which has been excluded from the Bible, speaks of the ways of the fallen angels,
wicked humans, and the Nephilim they together bred. Many ancient texts and manuscripts
support the idea that the digression of the human race was the catalyst for the most recent mass-
flooding event worldwide. This is on record through Vedic, Christian, Chinese, and Central
American religion as well as through hundreds of other written artifacts from ancient
civilizations. Depicting the flood and other events associated with the biblical world-wide
apocalypse; such as solar coronal discharges, land infertility, glacial meltdown, extreme heat/
cold, mass-animal species extinctions, etc. There is ample scientific evidence for world flooding
events in core drills, rain erosion features in deserts, and other peculiar geomorphological
phenomena. As the days grew hotter, the oceans dried up, the water level lowered, yet the
glaciers melted, which rose it once more, and this interplay would have likely generated clouds
which extend far beyond the inversion zone, as they would be very dense with rain. Some parts
of the world would have seen rain for days, while others would have been decertified in a matter
of weeks. Not one but cyclical global mass-flooding events are said to have existed, this on the
behalf of Science organizations. It is possible that the most recent flood was in fact the last flood,
as much sacred scripture suggests. The Sphinx Water Erosion Hypothesis has gained attention in
the upper echelons of history and archaeology. However, anyone who presents the evidence is
flagged as ‘fringe’. Now it has completely cornered the mainstream narrative and scientific
establishments have run out of excuses. The only way the sphinx enclosure can display such
heavy rainfall erosion is if there was once water in the desert, and the last time Egypt was a rich
 Page 9 of 71

and humid jungle was at least 12,000 years ago. This is further detailed in the free-energy section
of this publication, where strong, objective evidence for ancient high-technology is presented
through inquiry into megalithic constructions.

As it stands, Einstein’s General (classical) Theory of Relativity along with his Special
Theory of Relativity is deeply incompatible with quantum mechanics due to the effects of
gravity being untenable as discontinuous fields; there are no gravitational quanta. Quantum
mechanics has painstakingly derived a quantifiable (quantum) description for the effects of the
supposed fundamental forces of electromagnetism, weak interactions, and strong interactions. All
string theories, as well as those of atomistic cubism, and infinitely-universal-frame-of-reference
theories, have their own interpretations for the various wave-forms of aether vibrations without
ever shedding light on the field upon which the strings vibrate. ‘Strings’ are analogous to aetheric
single-point oscillations, and their magnitude and oscillatory frequency is the result of the
toroidal self-similar oscillatory patterns within indivisible, indiscrete, yet identifiable and
measurable (in terms of charge; capacitance) nodes of material manifestation. The most
significant issue with modern theories of gravity is that they ultimately rely on the existence of
quantum force carriers; gravitons, which are entirely hypothetical, and have never been proven to
‘exist’ in the conventional way they deem other particles exist. It is therefore erroneous to a
greater degree to say that gravity is composed of particles if there has been no detection of either
and the closest and most recent estimation and extrapolation depicted the epitome of what a
‘wave-form’ would be. The other three of the four ‘fundamental forces’ are said to involve force
carriers for both electromagnetism and what atomism refers to as weak and strong interactions
experienced in photons, W & Z particles, and bosons. In electromagnetism, the force carrier is ‘γ’
a photon; which in reality is a wave-peak, where electroscopes register the most energy, and
atomists interpret as a particle. The Weak Force is said to govern particle decay through the
action of force-carrying W (+ & -) & Z (0) particles, which act on quarks and leptons. The
Strong force, which is said to bind sub-atomic particles together, is carried by gluons, and acts
on quarks (and gluons; they are gluons) to bind and keep quarks together. They have thus derived
a quantum measure for every force except gravity, and fundamentally by necessity attribute this
measure; which consists of wave-peaks within a field-disturbance, to a vacuum. Gluons are
attributed to the strong force, and both of their namesakes discloses the nature of their action,
which was found to be the hardest to overcome. How could a vacuum produce such strong
physical forces? Where is the tension coming from if there is nothing to be in any state of tension
of torsion? Where is the inertia if there is nothing in motion? Where are the waves if there is no
medium undulating?

Waves of water go on a horizontal plane which is, for the sake of argument, two
dimensional. Waves of sound, however, undulate the gaseous medium through longitudinal
waves of contractions and rarefactions of the gaseous mixture which comprises air in three-
dimensions, bouncing around the room and always interfering with itself. Light waves, the rarest
of the three, can be thought of as undulating in a fourth dimension. This fourth dimension is the
source for all single-point undulations including light. Unlike sound, light does not interfere with
itself. Two spherical waves can and do often intersect with each other but exhibit no interference
 Page 10 of 71

regardless of light output. What may seem like interference; such as a laser pointer in daylight
not being visible across the sky, is really just due to a perceptual interference wherein the light of
the sun overpowers that of the laser within our eyes, not in the physical world. The laser still
shines for the same distance it would were there to be no light present. Light can often also go
through solid objects. It is argued that this process often slows down light, which then upon
leaving the object gains back speed. This was debated for a long time between wo branches of
science, which each believed the inverse of the other; light slows down or speeds up when
traveling through a transparent object.

Electromagnetism acts between electrically charged particles; it is the oscillatory

frequency resonance and inertial capacitance of toroidal wave-peaks with others. The weak force
is responsible for radiation; decay of particles, and is is second in weakness only to ‘gravity’. All
of these axioms are held true by those who do not wish to partake in the true scientific method.
Some say there are no final truths in science, which is true, but as Mark Merlin; a top-tier
biologist, conservationist, and polymath which I had the pleasure to learn from in my
undergraduate studies said; “no final truths is science”. Modern Science, in the personified/
deified sense has even attribute of a religion and cult-like mentality. It should be called
Scientism. Scientism, and one of its tenets; atomism, purport that all matter is composed of
subatomic particles called quarks, ‘glued’ together by gluons and every so often interacting with
other rare and energetically-volatile ‘particles’. The name ‘cult of bumping particles’ [6] is very
fitting. Up quarks and down quarks are said to be attached both to each other and themselves to
form protons and neutrons; with the former containing two up quarks and one down quark, and
the ladder two down quarks and one up quark. What is implied by this is that there is an
icosahedral geometry within matter, or at least ‘matter’ within the axioms of atomism, and that is
how it comes into light and stays locked as pressure-differentials of opposite polarities and
vectors; centrifugal divergent and centripetal convergent. A molecule is a geometrical positioning
of point-source charge fields and endowed with a collective discharge component in such that the
entire molecule is stable. Hence why heat and other forms of energy can denature molecular
structures, but if there is a balance in charges and inner vibrational speed, a molecule is stable.

Although the modern atomic structure is an interesting conception it serves no purpose in

explaining many physical phenomena. If, as according to atomists; the universe was created
nihil-ex-nihilo, then where did the energy existing today come from? Surely there would have to
be an equal and opposite reaction to the creation of all this energy where once there was none,
and this would effectively render all the energy in the universe back to a nill state. Thus, as
Newton and all the greats have said, energy is always transformed, and cannot come from
nothing. It only can be generated or transformed from a process which includes motion, which
by necessity denotes the motion of a substance or thing that has the capacity to store and
transform energy into motion and vice-versa. They deny the existence of intelligent design, and
despite their endless mathematical axioms dismiss the truly important constants and functions of
the mechanics of the universe. Phi and Pi are taken as coincidences and the very fact that man
beholds intelligence is said to have come about by random, meaningless entropy. How is it that
we, intelligent beings, deny the existence of an intelligence that is not only necessary for, but
 Page 11 of 71

obviously behind all the patterns we observe in nature and within ourselves? It is selfish to use
one’s intelligence to deny the idea that the process by which their intelligence came to be is not
in itself if not equally as intelligent, more intelligent than they are. Nature is given ‘seed’ of light
from source which ascends upwards from the center of the earth and curves parabolically before
cascading down through the sun and moon and all heavenly luminaries, and consequently unto
the earth. This light has always existed, and will always exist. As everything else in the universe,
though, it also has cycles. The Oneness. The single-point. One can say it is a still-point because
there exists no-thing actually moving; juxtaposed to the dynamic part of the universe wherein the
heavens and consequently everything under them move; in cycles. Differing only in their
magnitude; duration and intensity on the physical universe. Everything comes from and goes
back to the still light of God. God is the single-point. The Eternal One. The monist metaphysical
school does not reject dualism, but rather incorporates it as an extension of the oneness. This
oneness is the true center of the dualistic universe of light and dark; up and down, hot and cold.
It sits just under the magnetic mount meru in the center of the earth, as we will further delve into.
Ultimately, it is this central point that has not only been hidden from all maps, but also, from all
minds, in that; it is God. Atomism was devised to instill a nihilistic, materialistic, and
individualistic mind-state upon the individual that gets caught in its maze. Heliocentrism is a
soul-lure system. It separates everything from everything else while disassociating clear
synergies and keeping disciplines distant from one another. Both together assign our existence to
entropy. The core of atomism is to worship the physical sun (sol) while ignoring the true Soul of
the earth; hence Atum-Ra in dynastic Egyptian religion & metaphysics. All ancient cultures and
myths speak of an eternal, universal soul of the universe. This is the Still-Point of Creation. The
source for the heavenly ‘akasha’; celestial planes amidst the firmament which act as a capacitor,
storing energy/information as a record of every previous earthly energetic being’s life as they
enter and exit it. This piece of information is subjective, and; as I have said plentifully
throughout this book, specific areas which provide solely a metaphysical or rational explanation
and lack experimental or empirical references (listed in the bibliography at the end of the book)
must be taken as such. The reader has no obligation to accept these beliefs as they are, but those
who are reading this are likely already adept in art of playing with an idea while holding no
attachment to it or those of their own. Syncretism is not always an objective process, what
matters is the outcome. For instance, to the extent of my current experimental abilities, I have no
way of finding out, physically, that the dynamo of earth’s celestial sphere spins and records upon
it the imprint of all beings and dynamic processes of the mother earth organism. This is a
cosmology wherein the celestial heavens encircle the earth, and their infinitude is in question, but
they are most definitely not traversable by any physical means as will be detailed in this work,
hence their infinity is certain. In another example, the heavens and reside strictly above, which is
just as likely, but not approached because it would not make sense from a heliocentric
perspective. As for the sky-earth duality, it has been argued that one may precede the other, but
this is trivial; nature is balanced evenly and to imagine that at the largest scale it would not be
could indicate a contradiction, but if there is one that precedes, it would be the upper hand. The
heavens, and our decisions then would be made infinitudes ahead of time in the higher worlds.
This is supported by the idea that, though light and dark, up and down, etc. are known dualities
of our three-dimensional universe, they are not perfectly even. One example is that the Golden
 Page 12 of 71

Yuga in one of the oldest systems of dating is significantly longer than the Kali Yuga, which we
are said to be currently experiencing, as a collective. Time is fleeting, the idea that it is all
happening at once is not one I hold in my heart. It is just logical that the past and future are in the
hands of our Creator. It also is hyper-logical that light overcomes darkness. Take a single lit
candle into a pitch-black room and watch the entire room flood with light. However, attempt to
place darkness inside a lit room and no matter how much you put in, the room will remain lit.
This is, of course, an analogy, as one cannot ‘pick up’ darkness just as one cannot ‘pick up’
photons, gravitons, and other ‘atoms’ as we will further delve into in the Quantum Mechanics
section of this work. Darkness is the absence of light; not the other way around. It seems also
logical that since Light is what gives life to the earth, not darkness (the sun, moon, planets, and
stars all generate light which trickles downwards to feed the earth). In life we get choices, they
may all be written down, but the only way for us to fully inner-stand the worlds above and below
us is to be in them, and we are not. For we were given these physical bodies to exist upon the
earth and care for other creatures and love one another. I believe we were not meant to fully
meddle in the higher spaces, inverse to what Rudolf Steiner and other Theosophists so ardently
propose. I think we shall thrive with all we need if we focus on the source of it all, and live an
honest earthly (nonetheless spiritual) life. We need not rely on divine entities other than our
Creator, which is the only One. The absolute. When addressing other entities, which is becoming
insidiously common either through conscious or subconscious means amongst society, humans
are almost certainly speaking with souls that have a low enough vibration such that it allows
them to interact with our third dimension. These are not ‘powerful beings’. They may pose as
angelic benevolent beings but will always be parasitic. Calling upon guides is dangerous as
exclaimed by all holy books. We must call upon The One, and He will send down guides for us.
They all succumb to the finger of God and the power of goodness on earth. The only method by
which they manifest themselves and survive is through our sin. Our digressions feed these inter-
dimensional parasitic spiritual entities and through conquering our sins we abolish them from our
presence. This is vitally important especially in the midst of the rampant programming not only
for nihilism and materialism as expounded upon in this paper but also of hyper-sexualizing
material ‘targeted’ (dreadful term) at children in pre-schools. Then there are world governments
and their top representatives, which are all misinformed marionettes (if lower in status) and
disinformation and corruption agents if higher in the ranks. Presidents are shown the truth about
much of what is kept secret from public’s eyes, technology that is only possible with the
knowledge of aether physics as displayed herein, and this is world-wide. It is beyond countries.
There are a select number of ‘noble' families whose world-dominance can be traced back to
biblical times and which have been in control of society, first through religious and now through
scientific institutions. They have, of course, had internal disputes and transfers of wealth and
territorial oversight, hence the founding of America, the dissolution of Yugoslavia, the Nazi
regime, and the two World Wars, but power has largely remained in the same hands. The peculiar
nature of the first example, when the declaration of independence was written in 1776 and
constitution in 1789 and the bill of rights in 1791, the United States was officially the country
that most empowered its citizens with equal opportunities, rights, and freedoms. It is now evident
by the state of countries such as Canada, Australia, and others who were not founded under
unalienable and constitutional principles, that the totalitarian, world-wide Novus Ordo Seculorum
 Page 13 of 71

has a tight grip on them, freedoms are taken away and the government is well aware that most
citizens not only cannot defend themselves or stand up against tyranny, but also don’t want to,
and live blissfully ignorant of it all.

The keystone for the existence of light quanta (photons) is the currently-accepted
mathematical interpretation of the photoelectric effect. It is said that when ultraviolet light strikes
a piece of metal such as sodium or zinc, the metal absorbs a negative charge which in turn causes
electrons to be ejected from it. The phenomenon truly at work is merely a wave-to-wave
proportionality, and atomism/particle-physics is not required to describe this effect. Ultra-violet
high-frequency undulations, upon imparting energy onto the metal, cause the metal to set off
aetheric undulations of negative charge (discharge) potential in a transverse fashion. There is a
problem with this derivation; if electrons are waves then light must also be waves. Electrons
have been observed to exhibit wave-particle duality and there are no experiments which
currently determine with accuracy an electron’s position or it’s composition. All electron theories
since the time of its conception by J.J. Thomson are purely mathematical and stand on
probabilistic grounds. The photoelectric effect is the only phenomenon which atomists cling to in
order to dispel the ample evidence for the undulatory theory of light. The assumption derived
from this effect is fallacious because it builds on the axiom that electrons are particles. If
electrons are in fact waves, for which there is indeed experimental evidence, then the
photoelectric effect is simply a form of internal reflection/excitation of the material by light in
the same way that magnesium in plant tissues does. The ‘internally reflected’ discharge wave has
a ‘negative’ charge and due to this is slightly different in its undulatory form. It is demonstrably
true that sodium and other metals absorb energy from UV light undulations striking it, which
imparts upon it more charge than it can hold; as every element needs to maintain a range of
specific charge potentials in order to exist in stable physical form. When this critical capacitance
is reached a triggering of the seeming ‘emission’ of negative charge which again is easily
accounted for by discrete ‘negative’, polarized undulatory discharges, akin to pulse-discharges.
This is also the phenomenon involved in photosynthesis. Chlorophyll contains magnesium in its
center, and it is that magnesium which is struck by the sun’s light, and which due to the
amplifying nature of the chloroplast thylakoid membranes, releases a discharge that is
proportional to the energy of the light pressure-induction striking it. Sunlight, especially in the
higher frequency range (purple) range imparts a strong charge upon the magnesium so to allow it
to set off pulse-discharge undulations. Instead of discharging though, these waves are are
harvested by the chlorophyll molecule and transferred to organelles with capacitance before
being selectively employed to break down carbon dioxide and water to produce oxygen and
glucose.

Relativity: My Perspective Alters Your Reality?

When prompted to explain relativity, Einstein is quoted attributing a physical malleability
of time to a psychological effect experienced by a man in different psychological states. In one
instance he is talking to a beautiful girl; where one hour may pass and feel like one minute, and
 Page 14 of 71

inversely that to a man sitting on a stove top, one minute may seem like an hour. Although this
may be true in the mind of the relativist, it does not extend beyond it into their physical reality. In
this example, to the men’s wristwatches, a minute is still a minute, and an hour is still an hour.
Time, as a human convention, is absolute, and its perception; depending on the state of mind of
an observer, may seem relative, but ultimately does not change reality. In the same way that
modern academia, and more fittingly, the authoritative priesthoods which discern the nature of its
teachings, posits, absolute time, and truth are non-existent. This is meant to separate humans
from the Absolute. The Divine Creator of the earth and mankind has endowed us with his
absolute attributes. To those who say there are no absolutes, and further that there is no good or
bad, may they posit a scenario, first presented to me through a video lecture by Dave Murphy, in
which they are a witness to someone leaving a wallet on the table and walking away. They are
left with two choices; the first is to run after them and return their wallet, and the second is to
keep the wallet for themselves. Imagine that they choose to keep it, they will return home only to
find that person’s credit cards, insurance cards, and perhaps a picture of their loved one. The
person then, by means of the moral compass imbued within their hearts, (granted that they are
human) feels remorse for the other, and imagines the way in which by not having that picture of
their mother or other sentimental portrait dear to them will bring pain and suffering to the person
from whom they have just stolen. In the process of bringing this wallet home, they will do so
with caution that nobody is watching, and they will not be proud in the case that they are caught
in the act of taking it home. On the other hand, if they choose to return the wallet, they will run
after the person while calling out for them, while paying no mind to and feeling indifferent to the
idea that someone will see their action, for they know they are doing a good deed. Upon
returning the wallet, they will be met with the gratitude of the other person, who will smile and
likely applaud them, or in the very least say thank you and feel an inner comfort that they did not
loose their wallet along with all that is within it of value, be it financial or emotional, to them.
The person who has done the good deed, though they may, if greedy, feel some remorse for not
stealing, will feel a greater sense of good that will warm their hearts, knowing they have
contributed to the happiness, instead of sadness, of a fellow human being. In this way, The
Creator (or creative force for those who excessively personify the creation/source aspect) has
placed within our hearts a moral compass that is aligned to His values. Thus all aspects of
absolute time, space, and human emotion are directly stemming from the source of our universe,
and thus are inescapable within all facets of human experience, independently of all
psychologically-reified inertial reference frames. It is for this reason that existence can never be
relative, for there is only one source of all human experience and hence only one universal
reference frame from which we can deduce the inner-workings of the universe. For this life and
all the foundational, timeless, and universal mechanics which render it possible (in the
clockwork that is the earth realm) are only possible through the Source. Some may term its
generative aspect as ‘The Creator’, but the source of this world has not a gender in the human
convention of the term. The creative force (which comes from the One Source (free from duality)
simply embodies the male principles of generation, as a seed does, while the earth embodies
principles of fertility; reception and nurturing of creative seed patterns; i.e. plant, animal, fungal,
bacterial, and mineral/crystal inherent/pre-determined life growth patterns. This is the
foundational principle of DNA and the reason humans yield humans and cacti yield cacti. This is
 Page 15 of 71

also why the microscopic Planarian can regrow its entire body if any segment of any section is
cut, despite also exhibiting cell differentiation like humans and other animals do. Somehow
every cell of the body understands the composition and position of every other cell of the body,
so to allow Planarian flat-worms to completely regenerate a copy of itself from even a small
sliver of its body. There is no relative existence when it comes to the small dissected piece of
flatworm, because it is programmed to grow into a full-sized flatworm with absolute ratios and
patterns respective to each of its cells. In the same way that there is no relative existence in the
perspective of our own cells, such as our immune cells, which can detect an infection and locate
it and address it biochemically with intelligent precision and coordination of millions of different
cells, enzymes, and molecules. The intelligence around the world, especially within our own
cognitive facilities, is a testament to the intelligence of the Source of this world. Call it Creator if
you will, or remain in the systematically dry interpretation of modern Science, which shuns
metaphysics and divine intervention. Granted there are severe gaps in the understanding of many
phenomena as a result of this, including premonition, lucid dreaming & other OBE’s,
clairvoyance, and all other forms of extrasensory perception.

General relativity has curved space-time and special relativity has flat space-time. In
either case, matter is able to bend, wether due to its velocity or its curvature path of least
resistance. Special relativity is special in that it does not account for gravity, and the only reason
is because without doing away with it, the entire axiom falls apart. General relativity employs
gravity as the curvature of space-time; a three-dimensional, and mathematically tangible fabric
alleged to constitute the universe. The clear contradiction in both theories is that one clock still
must work faster than another clock, but there is no distinction between which clock is running
faster because, as aforementioned, neither time nor space have any properties, and hence neither
can be dilated, contracted, or warped, lest it be in the realm of metaphysical mathematics. This is
where the theory breaks down and Einstein, Dirac, Dyson, Feynman, Sagan and all accredited
proponents of relativity have not produced an answer to the simple question of; “Which clock is
moving?” Herbert Dingle in Science at the Crossroads presents a glimpse of the countless
correspondences he had with so-called ‘specialists’ on relativity, including members of the Royal
Society and publishers in American and British scientific journals. The former of which were
often silent or simply condescending and the latter, younger and particularly not adept, met the
criticism of the magical spell that ‘relativity’ is with inexhaustible diversions and preposterous
responses avoiding the question altogether. Dingle presents the clear question he posed scientific
authorities as it was presented it in his multiple papers, which were all denied publication rights
from the highest-ranking journals in which he was deeply acquainted with and esteemed for
publishing in. It states: “Two exactly similar clocks, A and B, are in uniform relative motion,
Einstein’s special relativity theory (1) that the onion is wholly relative, i.e. one belongs no more
to one clock than to another; (2) that the clocks work at different rates, i.e. one works faster than
the other. My question is: what, consistently with the theory, determines which clock works the
faster?” For this question he received no response and when he did, other than baseless, ad-
hominem insults of his intellect and diversions, he was met with letters of genuinely confused
scientists in the field of relativity who had accepted that understanding it was beyond them. This,
Dingle sets the tone of the times when referencing the case of a genuinely brilliant good friend of
 Page 16 of 71

his as evidence of the severe psychological effects posed by the unquestionable and authoritative
nature of notable scientific bodies. These organizations are supposed to be servants of the public
and instead they continue to go against their foundational principles of empirical truth and the
scientific method. The scientific method, simply, is hypothesizing of and finding physical,
replicable, observable experimental phenomena from which to subsequently formulate an
opinion or theoretical representation. Such phenomena must be, either through theory or
pragmatic terminology; in logical and objective terms, explained with reference to the natural
mechanisms behind it. Relativity employs the opposite; its genesis is in mathematics, and it seeks
to only defend itself from all angles instead of engage in an objective juxtaposition to any
criticism of it. That is the attitude of virtually every renowned scientist in the field of theoretical
physics. Scientific organizations and their associated scientists base an entire world view on
assumptions and contradictions, and still present it to the world and advertise it as absolute truth
(of course always staying away from the Newtonian notion of absolute truth in itself) without
any regard for the effect that this psychological conditioning and normalization of insanity has
had on these poor scientifically (truth-seeking) inclined souls. Arithmetic and equations are a
language; a way of expressing ideas. These ideas can be patently false just as much as they can
be true. One can create a hypotenuse from just about any two perpendicular lines, real or
imaginary. With the imaginary one one can associate a right triangle of which a hypotenuse can
be any figure or number and consequently also derive its sides so long as they are in accord with
the Pythagorean theorem. For instance, one could draw a triangle on pen and paper and label two
of its sides 2 and Pi, and hence derive the hypotenuse to be the 3.6 (square root of 13). This does
not mean that this triangle represents reality. It is said [that the worst errors in science are those
based on commonly accepted ideas. Time is a conceptual quantification of a continuum which
exists only in the mind that is doing the counting. Outside of it, time can only be measured by the
multiplicative phenomena of expression of the One Source, occurring at different rates for
different states of being. Relativity often mistakes observers for reference frames. Human beings
are not God, nor are we gods; we were created by God. YHWH, Allah, Brahman, Io, The Source
or however you refer to the One force of creation. Paying utmost reverence to this source of love
(which is generation), and source of all the light; which is the seed of life on the earth, is vital.
Modern physics obscures divinity and the idea of intelligent creation simply because there is no
room for such beliefs in data, which is often, but notably not always, inseparable from physical,
not spiritual phenomena. However, there is a place between systematic, dry scientific inquiry and
metaphysical spirituality where both doctrines merge. This place is physical and metaphorical.
Its physical location is directly above the north pole mountain ‘Mt. Meru’, which itself sits at the
center of the innermost latitudes beyond the arctic circle. This is further described in the
Heliocentrism chapter, but Polaris; the Pole Star, also stays perpetually put directly above above
the north pole and does not experience parallax, scientism priesthoods attempt to claim that it
does, but they also claim that light is bent by physical (non-celestial) matter. This is the source
for the aether and consequently the ultimate reference frame. The aether is the still-point field
from which light, heat, sound, dielectricity, magnetism and all other manifestations of energy
transformation and transmutation arise. Thus it is by extension the working, unchanging
physical/experimental reference frame. Without an absolute frame of reference upon which to
build an understanding of the inner-workings of nature, as ‘observers', entitled to our own
 Page 17 of 71

separate, atomistic realities, we are left to interpretation, and our lives lose their inherent
purpose. Existence becomes random, meaningless, and consequently materialistic. The soul is
further deceived when it is told it is constantly spinning out of control, but the body feels none of
it. That the sun is 93 million miles away and the moon 238,000 miles away, and the sun is
monumentally larger than the moon and yet from the earth they seem the same size. The earth is
in constant flux, in its inner and outer worlds, but it is not physically moving, let alone spinning.
The earth is fixed in its foundations. The Sheol is the ancient Hebrew depiction of the earth’s
foundations, often referred to as the pillars of the earth. As the north-pole, the Sheol also has a
thousand names.

If truth and reality are relative to each observer, then what happens when two observers
come together? One must always yield their truth to the other, and vice-versa. Who determines
whose truth must yield when all truths are relative? The simple answer to that, as Tim Fortin, a
Ph.D at Seton Hall university, Herbert Dingle, F.R.S Ph.D and president of the Royal
Astronomical Society said; whoever has the most authority. This is widely implicative because if
cosmology and all natural laws are relative to each observer, then the power to behold truths
about our world and the mechanics behind it must be yielded to the institutions which have put in
place relativism to begin with. There is no clear distinction in the theory as proposed by Einstein
in 1905 that dictates which observer the truth shall be yield to, and hence truth will always be
subject to interpretation. By extension, the jury in this interpretation will always be the
establishment. As Dr. Fortin states, this is against our very human nature of communion. Two
subjects cannot come together and discuss anything, for they always possess separate and
objective realities, both of which are, by definition, equally valid. It grants every subject a ‘god-
like’ power to dictate their own reality and hence, will never allow for two people in any
scientific discipline to determine that which is true and absolute, for they cannot speak the same
language, let alone be in the same time frame. When in reality, there is only one objective,
absolute Source of the world and all its phenomena, which gives rise to all truths. All subjects are
mere receptacles of this truth, and they can grow near it, or segregate themselves, atomistically
and subjectively from it. This is the crux of atomism and relativity. The belief that everything
which exists is that which can be counted, and to count anything, one must remove it from its
bound existence, which is never segregated, but unified with all that surrounds it. The idea that
light, magnetism, electricity, and matter are all composed of atoms, and further that the reality
behind the existence of these atoms is relative, would never allow for science to reach a baseline
or foundation on the conclusions upon which truth can be built. Experiments will always be
subject to interpretation, and phenomena will always be uncertain. This is atheistic at its core and
goes against platonic and Aristotelian logic. If everyone’s truth is relative, how can two people
ever commune? How can there be any truths at all? Who determines whose truth is true? The
answer is, again, quite ironically, that the ones who have put in place relativist and atomist
doctrines; are the ones to which truth is ascribed from, and that everything is composed of atoms,
and that time and space can curve so as to keep the speed of light constant.

Common sense, rationality, reason and objective experimental observation are the only
grounds on which science can progress. The turn towards ignorance and dogma experienced by
 Page 18 of 71

the scientific community during the 1900’s is clearly displayed in Herbert Dingle’s Book Science
at the Crossroads. For a more recent representation of the state to which we have scientifically
regressed, I shall quote an answer to the question of mutual time dilation: “Every moving frame
has its own time perception, and if different people are in differently moving frames they
perceive different time(s?). That might even result in exterior event sequences being switched -
for example, star A becomes a supernova before star B for one frame, and the other way around
for another frame. Don’t try to apply common sense to relativity, it leads you wrong. Common
sense developed in a non-relativistic environment.” This is a physicist that has been so deeply
disconnected from reason that he pitifully states “perception” as the cause behind time-dilation
without realizing that mutual time dilation is illogical and only plausible as far as someone’s
perspective is concerned, not at all with respect to physical reality. He may believe that the time
dilation is not truly real physically, only conceptually, in which case he does not understand the
scope of special relativity as objectively stated by Einstein in his original 1905 paper on the
subject. [2] This demonstrates how dire the situation in scientific establishments is, where
hundreds of graduates are going out into the world to work on highly dangerous projects, such as
those involving high energy physics, and using equations that, although correctly describe some
phenomena due to the ingenious way in which physical patterns have been represented through
constants, still do not describe or reflect the physical reality of our world.

Light Clocks: Glaring Errors & Dim Results

In Einstein’s famous light clock example; the fixed observer, were he to 'see’ in time-
lapse, would see the light beam on his friend’s clock as his friend walks past him, instead of
going simply up and down, form a trail resembling a zig-zag pattern, because not only is the
beam moving up and down as it bounces between the two plates, but also, since the observer that
is holding it is moving horizontally, the fixed observer sees the path of light as seemingly longer
due to the combined vertical and horizontal displacement. Thus the fixed observer deems that the
light on his friend’s clock, as appearing to take a longer distance between each plate, must
signify that his friend’s time has been slowed. This is irrespective of the fact that the two clocks
had been synchronized before the second observer began moving. The largest fallacy with this is
the fact that were one to ask the moving observer how fast his clock is moving, he would assure
you that it is moving at normal speed, and has not slowed down due to his moving. This is
because from his frame of reference, if he were to envision a trail/time-lapse of the beam of light,
he would see only a straight line (not a zig-zag), right in front of him, at all times. Thus, Einstein
postulates that since the fixed observer sees the moving observer’s light beam seemingly moving
a longer distance between each interval, then the moving observer’s time must be slowed. This is
an issue when you consider the moving observer’s perspective of the fixed observer’s light clock.
As the moving observer moves past the fixed observer, he would see his friend’s light beam as
traveling in a zig-zag as he approaches and as he departs away from him, while remaining in
synchrony with his clock in the moment that his friend is aligned with him on his friend’s
journey perpendicular to his light of sight. This, in essence, is the paradox of mutual time
 Page 19 of 71

dilation. If one observer’s reality is yields to another observer’s perspective, then why wouldn’t
the other observer’s reality also yield to the first observer’s perspective? If one of the first
observer’s second equal’s three of the second’s seconds, and one of the second observer’s
seconds equals three of the first observer’s seconds, then both observers are dilated in time
simply due to the fact that only one of them is actually moving? If absolute motion does not
exist, then it is just as likely that the road is moving under your feet. This is not science, it is
against empiricism and logic. If time is relative, and inversely dilated and contracted, and the
second law of thermodynamics always holds true, then why can it be mutually-dilated? What
frame of reference is this dilation happening in inverse to? Every action has an equal and
opposite reaction. Time cannot bend or warp, for it has no properties. It is no ‘thing’. Time is
immaterial and infinite. The only measure of time which truly exists is that exhibited by the
heavens, all else exists conceptually in the minds of human beings, yet it is still not physically
tangible. Neither time nor space have properties. Space has attributes; it can give rise to matter
and energy, but it does not exist in-and-of itself. Space is merely the interplay of dielectricity and
magnetism. The toroidal and hyperboloidal conjugate geometry, as Wheeler states, is a
microcosmic fractal of the entirety of the universe and it lies within every indivisible proton; the
only truly nuclear and indivisible unit of matter. Electrons are not particles, they are spherical
wave-forms of dielectric tension discharge surrounding and emanating from each proton, and
they are what allows matter to keep its shape. Without this dielectric tension, protons (which
really are the hyperboloid force vectors within an indivisible nexus of the matrix which
composes elemental matter) would give way to their plane of inertia and consequently spin out
of control and decay. Just as if one were to suddenly stop the movement of the stars, all matter
would begin to dissolve, the global weather would be severely affected, and the sun and moon
would no longer move. Half of the earth would plunge into a deep ice age, while the other half
would scorch and lose all of its water and consequently, life. It would eventually polarize in a
static sea of energy until an equilibrium was reached, at which point there would be quite
literally no-thing left. Without motion there is no light; thus no charge (dielectricity), nor
magnitude (magnetism). Consequently, in this hypothetical scenario there would be no gradient
nor distinction between everything and nothing, and nothing would be. Truly, nothingness.

The Twin Paradox: “I See You Move. Thus, I’m Older”

A famous paradox in the relativity theory proposed by Einstein is the Twin Paradox. This
is the idea that time dilation as a result of the motion of a subject would result in the
disproportionate aging of two twins, one of which leaves the earth and comes back only to be
younger than the first. This is brilliantly exposed as fallacious by Dr. Herbert Dingle F.R.S., who
was in fact president of the Royal Astronomical Society at the time when he first realized that
what he had been teaching for decades had been substantially wrong. Shortly thereafter he wrote
his book “Science at the Crossroads”, for which he received harsh initial criticism from
publishing authorities at the time of its publication. Although the paper followed rational
common sense and logical, empirical wisdom, because it went against the prevailing theories of
the time, and hence was a well-armored threat to the nihilistic system ushered in by modern
 Page 20 of 71

theoretical physics, it was immediately shut down. Leaving its opponents no choice but to resort
to ad-hominem abdications of it. In the preface, Dingle presents a letter from professor R.A.
Lyttleton F.R.S. which is such an attempt to discredit Dingle’s work through philosophical over-
complications and diversions of what really is a simple matter, and further so as to claim that
those who oppose the authoritative doctrine are foolish or do not fully understand its complexity.
This is classical in regards to what he, as a fellow of the scientism nexus that is the royal society,
is precisely meant to do. It is a fact that nature is simple, contrary to what modern scientific
priesthoods such as the royal society and the Smithsonian purport. In this letter, which appeared
in The Times on the eighth of January, Lyttleton states: “In brief, what Dingle has steadfastly
maintained these many years against all comers is this: That if Peter and Paul are identical twins,
and Paul goes on a journey leaving Peter to stay home, then when Paul returns he will still be
exactly the same age as his brother.”. He further goes on to discuss that Paul would arrive back
having aged less than Peter, and hence younger, and that for everyday speeds this effect is
negligible, so to explain the unmeasurable tenacity of such a claim. Physical inquiry and
observable experiments are not always necessary for a strictly mathematical framework of
reality, and its nature can only be ‘verifiable’ and ‘replicable’ through the mathematical concepts
given that they are built on the same axioms which give rise to it. Relativism, as we have
covered, only exists in the mind of the relativist, and any advancements in physical science
which authoritative bodies present as credence of it are merely, equally, only making use of such
concepts in the minds of those interpreting them. There exists still, as we will cover, more
accurate ways of describing such phenomena which not only exceeded the methods currently
employed, but discern the reasons as to why such methods are undoubtedly false.

In Einstein’s 1905 paper “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, he presents two
postulates which, even by his own admittance, are apparently irreconcilable. His first postulate;
that all frames of reference are equally valid, is stated as such “the same laws of electrodynamics
and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold
good.” It is noted on the publication that Einstein was not aware of Lorentz transforms which
preceded Einstein’s paper and which imply the same conjecture, and we as readers are supposed
to take that as it may. He then presents this ‘new’ conjecture as the Principle of Relativity.
Nevertheless, his second postulate presented shortly thereafter states that “light is always
propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion
of the emitting body.” [1] He then goes on to say that a luminiferous aether is consequently
unnecessary as the universal frame of reference, and that this would give credence to the null
result of the Michelson Interferometry experiments. [1] That is, of course, if one assumes the
earth to be in motion, which it is not.

The Clock Paradox: Another Step Away From The UFT

The earth, and the aether, are fixed and immoveable. All Einstein did was replace the
universal, stationary frame of reference that is the unifying aether field for the speed of light
constant, which is derived merely as a function of the defined values for time and space; the
 Page 21 of 71

second and the meter, respectively. In a true UFT (unified field theory), the values for these
universal units of measurement should ideally come from one millionth of both the time it takes
for the sun to encircle the earth during the equinox and the distance from the earth to the highest
point in the heavens, respectively. That is, however, for further inquiry and deserves an entire
paper of study and experiment in its dedication. In this paper, we will focus on the reasons for
which Einstein’s 1905 publications, and in this chapter particularly, his work on the principle of
relativity, is false and self-contradicting. As stated above, the first and second postulate of
relativity are non-congruent. Any true inquiry into the mechanics of the universe that is
inherently incorrect at its center will exhibit paradoxes throughout its fringes. This is evident by
the mutual time dilation exhibited by the clocks in Einstein’s example and all variants of it. In
Einstein’s 1095 paper, he presents Clock A, which moves in a linear fashion relative to clock B,
and hence Clock A would experience a dilation in time and would tick through each second
slower than Clock B, despite before beginning its horizontal translation it being synchronized
with same. This is the second postulate, and theoretically it holds true although no time dilation
has ever been observed by means of experiment, granted it would be of nearly immeasurable, but
notably not fully immeasurable proportions due to the speed of light being such a large numerical
value. However, as soon as one attempts to reconcile this with the first postulate; that the same
laws of electrodynamics and optics are valid for all reference frames, one is met with the paradox
of mutual time dilation, which is not only immeasurable, but impossible.

This should sound every alarm in the mind of the rational and experimental physicist, for
time dilation of a subject by the will of their observer could never exist in real-world observable
conditions. What Relativity’s two foundational postulates suggest, when taken together, is that
either clock can be said to be moving with respect to the other, and hence that either clock can
experience a dilation in its temporal parameters; in other words, slow down. How does one
determine which clock is the moving one? The simple answer is that one simply cannot. Surely
not by means of theory alone, as is the current situation. This discernment would require an
experiment in which an external, universal, fixed frame of reference, such as the aether, is to be
used in determining the parameters of both clocks simultaneously so that one may be said to be
moving. Anything else is illogical, for Science today cannot account for dark energy and dark
matter, which is really the aetheric undulatory mechanisms that give rise to all light and matter in
the universe. Thus, in an attempt to dispose of the aether, Einstein has ingeniously created a
necessity for it. For his clock paradox can only be solved, and even approached, with respect to
it; a unifying field. He utilized Lorentz’ and Poincaré’s math; which accounted for the aether, and
turned the speed of light ‘c’ into the universal frame of reference instead of it. Einstein
consequently turned everything into a “vacuum”; despite vacua being unable to account for the
multiplicity of wave-forms the aether is able to produce given different amplitudes of stress or
strain upon it’s plenum. Green’s theorems and other elastic aether theories of his contemporaries
display beautiful symmetry and are much more descriptive of real-world phenomena than the
thought experiments forged from the canonical set of relativistic equations in Einstein’s Annus
Mirabilis papers. Such aether theories articulately provided explanations for the seeming elastic
components of the aether; in that it is able to undergo tension and compression as a rarefied/
primal form of matter.
 Page 22 of 71

There lies left no other possibility of relativity being true in any respect, for there will
always remain the question; which clock is truly stationary, and which is in motion? This is an
arbitrary question and it will always be true only in the mind of the relativist, not in the physical
world. Time moves mountains, it turns grasslands into forests, collapses glaciers, etc; time
shapes the earth. Time is constantly moving forward with infallible precision and strength akin to
the cycles of the sun and the moon. Time is a conceptual quantification of an abstract concept.
Time only may truly be tracked and told based on the motions of the heavenly bodies, which are
infinitely cyclical yet dynamic. It is a continuum, it cannot be broken, bent, or warped in any
way, shape, or form. In his 1905 paper, Einstein attempts to negate this inevitable paradoxical
conclusion by presenting a thought experiment in which Clock A sits at the center of a wheel that
is rotating, so that it only experiences axial momentum but zero movement or displacement,
while clock B sits at the edge of such a wheel, and thus is constantly in orbital motion about the
center; relative to clock A. In this experiment, it is first attainable that clock B must be clearly the
one experiencing a dilation in time, but the same paradox is met when one fixes B as the axis of
axial momentum, much in the same way that a fishing reel can be fixed to a vice while the entire
fishing pole rotates about its axis. In the case of this experiment, the fishing pole is akin to the
wheel itself, which rotates, carrying with it Clock A, in circular orbits around the fixed point of
B, which has taken preference as the reference frame. Irrespective of how it is viewed, the clock
paradox is always a paradox, and the only way out is for both clocks to abide by an external
frame of reference instead of serving as their own. This, ironically, speaks for the most widely
implicative problem of Atomism; that everything is separate and thus subject to its own
experience and reality. When in fact, all the ‘atoms’ of a book, or of a single letter of ink or even
a single pixel on this page, are in fact inseparable and indivisible as a whole. Half of an eye is no
longer an eye, but a composite of various kinds of cells. We can classify cell types; such as that
of a cone or a rod cell. However, as soon as that is halved, it is no longer a cone or a rod. Then
one must look at a smaller increment of that; a cone cell’s nucleus, for instance. When halved,
also will not yield anything that can be referred to as a nucleus. A single strand of DNA, when
halved, will yield nucleotides. Further halved it will yield nucleosides and phosphate groups.
Neither of which can be referred to as DNA. A nucleoside can be taken and subdivided into its
sugar & amino acid molecular components, and so on until one reaches a single ‘atom’. The idea
of which, is self-destructive. No element can exist on its own in nature/duality. It must occur as a
composite along other dense matter to exist in a stable configuration within its environment.
Even hydrogen gaseous atoms must exist coupled to one another, and to exist alone, notably only
temporarily, they must be placed in a true vacuum; free from any other gaseous matter.
Eventually, in the endless quest to find the unifying framework of all matter, we arrive at singlet
hydrogen, which forms the structure for all other matter to exist. It is the ground state of the first
so-called ‘shell’ of every other atom, defined currently as one proton and one electron. Though as
we will cover, an electron does not exist conventionally, and can only exist, by definition, when
kept in a field-form by the discharge emanating from a Proton-Point-Source (PPS). The PPS is
the inner hyperboloidal geometry of centripetal expansion and centrifugal contraction, the source
for all single-point oscillations of the aether which manifest as tangible matter. A proton then,
one could argue, is the only matter that truly exists, by definition, physically. However, upon
 Page 23 of 71

further peering into its nature, we find that it too needs a discharge component (the field
emanations which modern physicists wrongly discern as electron probability clouds) to exist, and
without it, would quickly bind to anything in its surrounding area to achieve an equilibrium, due
to it’s potential charge component. Thus the very idea of a proton being composed of individual
quanta is absurd and erroneous by necessity. A cell can not exist on its own, neither can a
nucleus, without distorting its field structure as a result of the environment around it.

Modern physics, regardless of tenet, reify ‘time’ and ‘space’ as physical entities, thereby
assigning to them properties. This assumption is exemplified in the current interpretation of the
Michelson-Morley experiment, in which an interferometer arm can shrink/contract in its spatial
dimensions while dilating/expanding in its temporal dimensions. The largest fallacy with this
assumption is the fact that neither time nor space have any physical properties. Time is a human
convention which exists only in the mind, while space is an attribute given to an area occupied
by what we conventionally refer to as matter, however, upon closer inspection of this matter we
find that even it is not entirely physical at all, but rather composed of pressure-differentials
created by wave-forms, which giving rise to fields which to our eyes may look discrete with
respect to their frequency, but that to a hypothetical observer on the molecular scale are merely
immersed in a sea of other fields, all of which act harmoniously in their wave-motions to exist.

Relativity states that an object’s velocity through space can alter its temporal dimension,
but the inherent paradox with this, is that time, as all else in nature, is not quantified, nor
discrete. It occurs continuously irrespectively of an observer’s frame of reference and
perspective. Einstein’s first postulate affirms that all frames of reference are equally valid, yet his
second postulate negates that statement by saying that an external observer’s perspective can
change the reality of another observer, and vice versa, manifesting the paradox of mutual time
dilation, a tremendous fallacy in both relativity. The light clock example proposed by Einstein
denotes that two people, one fixed, and one that is moving in a trajectory perpendicular to the
line-of-sight of the fixed observer. They both are holding synchronized light clocks, which
essentially are two plates in between which a light beam is bounced back and forth at even
intervals; denoting a discrete measure for the passage of time. It is no surprise that he used light
clocks, as the speed of light itself; c, is the universal frame of reference in Einstein’s equations
for special relativity. It is merely the aether’s rate of induction. These insights I attribute to Ken
Wheeler of Youtube and Run Ze Cao of Run Ze Education. They were both extremely helpful in
furthering my aether research. There are a lot of controlled opposition groups out there that
anyone researching relativity and QM must beware. Nassim Haramein of Resonance Science,
Greg Braden & Gaia crew, all mainstream ‘Science’ Youtube Channels (usually sponsored by
Brilliant, Masterclass, or The Great Courses Plus), countless social media accounts, many
hundreds of blogs posting mild (unimportant), diet-truths and promoting materialistic, self-
worship & physical sun worship (often times unwittingly) and nihilistic diluted Hindu, Greek,
and Egyptian metaphysics must be listened to with a generous amount of salt. The aether was
once the universal frame of reference, but it has since been rebranded, over-extrapolated, evaded
until possible then quickly chastised from all physics, without anyone noticing the glaringly
obvious but ingeniously mischievous ways in which it has been hidden in plain sight. It is all that
 Page 24 of 71

truly exists, and none of the chemical reactions and charge dynamism which powers the minds
and bodies of those who deny its existence would be willed to occur were it not for the unifying
medium. The aether medium gives rise to all subtle and dense elements, as well as all
fundamental forces. It thus gives rise to all matter and the entirety of earth’s energy dynamics.
Earth is a dynamo, and with respect to its atmospheric potential gradient and the nature of our
fourth dimension, it can possibly be thought of as the central plane of inertia resultant from the
centripetal descending vortices and centrifugal ascending vortices of light from the Oneness; the
still-point; singularity; Eternal One; God. Just as at the center of matter there is no matter to be
found, at the center of the earth there is no earth to be found. The center is the single-point from
which the root and the branches of the tree of life extend. The two flux polarities of the torus
field are exhibited by the growth patterns of a tree. The tree’s branches usually extend outwards
and upwards, while its roots draw inwards and downwards into the soil, together they form a
hyperboloid-like shape, as we do when we space out our legs and hold each arm upwards away
from the other. Hence trees, as humans, have a toroidally-shaped aura. The auric field is an
inverse projection of the physical field, though it can be argued that the former precedes the
latter.

The Grandfather Paradox: Time Travel is Impossible

Time dilation as a result of the constancy of the speed of light in Special Relativity brings
about many paradoxes, the most strange of which is the grandfather paradox. It argues that since
time dilation is possible, then by extension time travel should also be, at least in theory, possible,
as is often spoken about casually in upper academia. However, if time travel is possible, then it
would be possible for someone to go back in time and kill their grandfather. If they do so before
the conception of their father, they will themselves never be born, and hence never be able to
time travel. This is a contradiction. It is paradoxical in every sense because that if one can time
travel, they can prevent their own birth, and consequently never time travel. Nature does not deal
with paradoxes, it is diversely, though orderly perfect and self-similar; patterns repeat themselves
in a wide range of material forms. Time, however, is set in the foundations of the earth. It has
been set since the earth’s creation. It is untouchable lest by the hand of The Creator Himself.
One cannot alter time, let alone space, due to their perspective. That is irrational,
illogical, and simply incorrect. Critical thinkers, reductionists, and those who generously swing
Occam’s razor and practice the unadulterated scientific method can discern that time dilation,
and imperatively by extension, mutual time dilation and time travel, are all not physically
possible. The only way out is through uncovering observable, experimental proof of time
dilation, not computed with biased software nor extrapolated through axiomatic arithmetic. There
is no evidence that time travel is possible. Rather, evidence is virtually non-existent that even
time dilation is possible.
Another paradox which came to my mind as an extension of the principles of time travel
and the grandfather paradox is one perhaps less grim though still weirdly applicative. Say one
time travels to an earlier time during the resurfacing of post-diluvian human civilization and
decides to join society, this would create serious paradoxes from many angles. Their bloodline
 Page 25 of 71

will already contain the genetic information of multiple generations of people that lived in a very
industrialized, modernized world. If they pass on their genes, they will contaminate the gene
pool forever, change the course of human history. That would be impossible.

The Car/Ladder and The Garage Paradox

Another substantial paradox in Special Relativity is the example of a ladder, or in other
cases a car, which when moving through a garage at ‘relativistic speeds’ produces strange
paradoxical phenomena. Paradoxes in themselves are not to be disregarded, because from
abstract phenomenological pondering we can synthesize working models based on the inner
workings of nature, but when it comes to these inner workings themselves, we cannot dwell on
probabilities, uncertainties, and relativism. There is an absolute Truth in the universe which
pervades all speculation, theory, and in many cases even physical laws. The physics pedagogy
that has been in place over the last century or so is reliant on false conjectures made upon real-
world observations and severely lacking in its own experimental basis. Even in its own field of
interest, the mathematical theory of relativity, though beautifully multi-functional in the system
for which it was made, suffered serious injury when extrapolated to its deep, dark limits. Many
paradoxes have arisen as a result of this. In the case of the car, the garage fits the car perfectly,
and there is a garage-keeper who is responsible for closing both the front and back doors of the
garage, and he does so when the car is centered perfectly inside the garage while moving at near
light-speed. The idea is that the driver inside the car would experience time slowed down and
space contracted so that the car shrinks and fits perfectly in the garage, but to the but to the gate
operator, the speed of the car makes the car shrink, such that he cannot trap the car within the
garage for any second because the car becomes longer than the garage’s length. The version with
the ladder is similar. The ladder is moving through the garage at near light-speed and for a brief
moment it can be completely contained within the garage because due to its temporal dilation its
spatial dimensions are contracted and hence it shrinks in the direction of travel.

Ehrenfest-Einstein Paradox
Paul Ehrenfest was the first to publicly uncover a peculiar anomaly in special relativity
when exploring Born rigidity. The Ehrenfest paradox manifests itself when one imagines a rigid
cylinder made to rotate about its axis of symmetry. The radius (R) as seen in the laboratory frame
is always perpendicular to its motion, it is not affected by mass contraction and time dilation, and
should therefore be equal to its value R0 when stationary. However, the circumference (2πR) is
Lorentz-contracted to a smaller value while the cylinder is in motion by the factor γ. The fact that
in this theoretical experiment the radius stays the same while the circumference experiences
contraction gives rise to the contradiction that R = R0 and R < R. This is another double-meaning.
Physical nature does not deal with contradictions and uncertainties. Nature, as everything else in
creation, rises from the One Absolute. Through philosophical alchemy, by throwing a stone into a
still pond, one may truly turn mercury into gold, for he realizes that they are both wave-forms of
the same unifying substance, at slightly different frequencies. One stone is denser, and produces
 Page 26 of 71

deeper waves, the other is light and airy, producing small ripples. The spiritually adept may
discern that the stones, the pond, and all other forms of matter arise from the aether plenum in
the third-dimensional plane of existence and differ only from one another by energetic state.

Twin Frog Paradox

The twin-frog paradox is described as such: “Two Giant frogs are captured, imprisoned in
a large metal cylinder, and placed on an airplane. While in flight, the storage doors accidentally
open and the cylinder containing the frogs falls out. Sensing something amiss, the frogs decide to
try to break out. Centering themselves in the cylinder they push off from each other and slam
simultaneously into the ends of the cylinder. They instantly push off from the ends and shoot
across the cylinder past each other into the opposite ends. This continues until the cylinder hits
the ground. Consider how this looks from some other inertial frame, falling at another speed. In
this frame, the frogs do not hit the ends of the cylinders simultaneously, so the cylinder jerks
back and forth about its mean speed v. The cylinder, however, was at rest in one inertial frame.
Does this mean that one inertial frame can jerk back and forth with respect to another?
(Hint: Special relativity forbids rigid bodies in the strict sense.)” [LLPT 1.24]
This paradox suggests again that matter, time, and space can be warped for a moving
observer due to another observer’s perspective. As discussed further herein, this confusion of an
observer with a reference point, brings about flaws in the theory that no relativist is ready to
overcome. Time is immaterial, and one person’s perspective has zero authority on the temporal
aspects of another person’s reality. This is a mind-game and has zero experimental support. It is
purely theoretical and even Einstein concurred to this simple fact. It should be near shameful that
our society has gone on for so long without noticing the illusory nature of this theory, but of
course, there are those who believe that the orchestrators of this New system fully understand the
golden system. Yet, they create a mental puzzle for not only the physicists and scientists who take
it seriously and live in that fabricated reality, but also for the truth-seeker looking to reach the
center of the wheel of understanding of cosmic mechanics and natural science. Only through
studying atomistic and relativistic concepts deeply can one syncretize and really bring to light
their multiplicative incompatibilities and all the sinfully obvious errors which always occur at the
far fringes to which these theories have been stretched. One always reaches a dead-end. There is
no reconciliation between relativity and the real world, nor is there any between quantum
mechanics and the composition of matter and energy.

Quantum Mechanics: Is Matter All That Matters?

Hydrogen must exist bound to itself or another atom, and thus it can be considered to be
the only ‘thing’ that really exists, because as soon as one attempts to subdivide it further, its
composite parts are no longer stable and quickly assimilate or integrate into other matter. A
neutron must be addressed, as it also, like an electron, does not exist by convention. It is an
apparent source of mass in the nucleus of an ‘atom’ which really comes forth from the interplay
between the charge and discharge components of it. A single hydrogen atom is merely the
 Page 27 of 71

interplay between charge and discharge, kept in motion by the motions of the heavenly bodies
which send down the charge and the earth which receives it. This is the source behind the
inclination of all matter towards the earth.

All free neutrons become protons, and thus the phenomena that we discern to be two
different kinds of particles inside an atom are really one and the same, merely at different states.
Additionally, a hydrogen atom is not really a particle at all, for it does not exist conventionally,
and only as a part of something else; i.e. hydrogen gas (H2). The next question then arises; what
is a proton? It is merely the charge component of a hydrogen atom and, in larger atoms, the
magnitude of this charge component. So an atom of oxygen does not have six protons, but it has
a charge component that is six orders of magnitude larger than that of hydrogen. This can be
visualized as a torus field with six times greater inertia at its center and hence six times the
potential to resist (due to greater inner surface area of high energy density and aetheric pressure)
primary solar rays and consequently exhibiting six times the density and imparting it six times
greater acceleration towards the earth, hence why nitrogen, hydrogen, helium and any gas lighter
(having lesser inner surface area of high energy/flux density and aetheric pressure) than oxygen
sits above it within the earth’s atmosphere.

In Plato’s Phaedo, after a discourse about the nature of the soul and what follows before
life and after death, Socrates, Cebes, and Simmias engage in a long-winded conversation about
whether or not the soul perishes upon death, and whether knowledge is simply recollection.
Through logic and wisdom they discern that the soul is invisible and indivisible; divine, and
unchanging, while the body is visible; carnal, and in constant flux. Simmias and Cebes, however,
present objections to this view through the analogy of a harp, which once destroyed, can no
longer produce a harmony, concluding that the harmony no longer exists. The harmony can also
be seen as existing independently of the harp, as it can be achieved with any sonic instruments
through the same longitudinal-wave frequency. Socrates responds that the soul, being more
enduring than the body, must leave it for decomposition to ensue. They concur that the soul must
exist before the body, and add the fact that all knowledge is merely recollection; a remembering,
and hence humans are able to act accordingly with wisdom in unfamiliar situations, and again,
Socrates reminds Simmias that since the soul has existed before the body, then the body is not
the source of the soul. This forces Simmias to yield his argument, and assert that the harp is not
the source for the harmony, and that the soul existed long before the body, in a formless state,
and the body is the way in which it takes form. Simmias admits that the soul is not as a harmony
is to a lyre; the composite of the body. The harmony is in a way the reason behind the harp’s
existence, and without the medium to produce longitudinal wave-forms (compression waves);
air, there would be no transmission of sound, and hence the harp would bear no meaning.
Phenomenologically, the harp is not only produced for creating harmony, it is an extension of our
senses towards harmonies attuned to the resonant frequency of the environment around us.
Simmias realizes that the idea of the soul being a composite was becoming popular opinion;
though through only probable and plausible grounds. He goes on to confess, that “doctrines
which stand their truth on probabilities are impostors and they are very apt to mislead, both in
geometry and everything else, if one is not on one’s guard against them.”
 Page 28 of 71

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:

Werner Karl Heisenberg won a Nobel prize for mathematically stating that you cannot
determine both an object’s position and its momentum conjunctly and accurately yet they persist
on referring to the object being measured as corpuscular. This is an admittance and a stretched
rebuttal that atoms, if they exist, cannot be measured. One then takes a look at ‘photographs’ of
atoms and molecules, say produced by scanning electron microscopes or other high-tier
microscopy and notably, computation method to generate images, not photographs, of what the
program takes to be atoms and molecules. There is an important distinction between an image
and a photograph, just as there is an essential distinction between all that which by convention
exists and that which is imaginary; purely mathematical. Arithmetic is an essential method of
human interpretation and scientific exploration into the nature of things, albeit it can also be
dangerously malleable. Theories can be created from any point of view, always reflecting on a
physical experiment. This does not always inherently deem the substance within these theories as
accurate representations of the physical world and its inner-workings. What truly surpasses all
theory is law. Laws are what we should build our system upon, and any aspect that falls short, as
highlighted herein, should be cast from physics. The uncertainty principle states that one cannot
know anything because until we measure something we do not know its state and the act of
measuring itself changes that state, so we can never be certain of things.

Mass-Energy Equivalence
Special relativity attests that mass and energy are equivalently interchangeable. “I don’t
subscribe to the notion that something can come from nothing” -Nikola Tesla

Matter is seen, on improbably grounds, as equivalent as energy, represented by the

equivalence principle e=mc^2. Mass is truly nothing but energy, akin to light, heat, magnetism,
and electricity. It is in fact the seed of these attributes within the carbon, hydrogen, oxygen,
nitrogen and over a hundred distinct trace minerals which create life. Every single material point
of existence is an energetic standing wave-form, bound in tension and torsion of its fabric; the
aether. This means that heat can sometimes increase the friction within an elemental composite
such as wood, and setting it alight can do same so vigorously that oxygen drags carbon along
with it, rendering it volatile. Gases as all elements exhibit a particular density depending on the
elemental charge-state. This charge-state is maintained by the primary solar rays which flood the
inner-matrix of different elements in different flux-geometries respective to each elemental
lattice pattern. The lattice pattern is energy, but matter in itself does not turn into raw energy.

Gravity is described today by a form of action-at-a-distance in which two objects curve

the fabric of ‘space-time’ around them at a rate proportional to their mass and inversely
proportional to the distance between them. The inverse-square law states that the gravitational
force between two objects increases as the square of the distance between them decreases.
 Page 29 of 71

Hence, the gravitational force between two masses changes in inverse proportion to the square of
their distance. The equation used by modern physics to derive a numerical value for this
accelerative force is Einstein’s F = G (m1)(m2)/r2; wherein ‘r’ is the distance, ‘m’ the mass of
each object, and ‘G’ the gravitational constant. Einstein and other priesthoods of relativism and
heliocentrism assert that this force is not only responsible for the downward acceleration
experienced by any physical object upon the earth’s surface, but also for mutual mass
acceleration; two objects attracting each other. To attribute this never-before-detected and
hypothetically unmeasurable force to the effects of weak electrostatic attraction was clever; there
is no way to accurately measure one without the overpowering effect of the other, thus we can
never know for certain whether two masses are truly attracting each other by virtue of the extent
at which they form a curvature of space-time alone or whether it is through the active and minute
electrostatic attraction between their composite indivisible single-point torsion field oscillations;
or so-called atoms. Atoms which, as we will discuss, have no true ‘physical’ existence but rather
serve as nexus points for that which is beyond physical to emerge into our seemingly three-
dimensional world. Each point of matter differs merely by the distance between each of these
nexuses in its matrix. If for instance one splits a sample of sodium in half until it is no longer
visible, eventually one would arrive at a lattice. This lattice is not composed of particles, but
rather, is the negative-image of spherical convergence points along its matrix when any light-
based apparatus is used to measure it. Thus why through ‘electron’ microscopy, one is able to
peer inside substances through the repellant effect of these positively charged nexuses of point-
source oscillation to the discharge (negative) wave-forms which modern empiricism refers to as
‘electrons’.

Using FitzGerald’s and Lorentz’s Hypothesis and the additions from Larmor, Einstein
enthroned the atomistic, nihilistic heliocentric cosmology now used to describe infinitesimally
numerous yet finitely applicable formulae in physics. Through the atomistic, corpuscular theory
of light and charged matter i.e. ‘electrons’ one is compelled towards an infinite spiral of
information due to the nature of constants and their numerological patterns, though all of which
leads to and comes from nothing. The Energy and Mass equivalence principle E = mc^2 denotes
that an object can vanish as a result of it moving near the alleged universal speed limit; the speed
of light; ‘c’. In this axiom, an object moving at the speed of light would distort space-time as it
travels so to completely contract in its physical dimensions and all its purported ‘ponderable
mass’ would be converted to its equivalent in energy. One of the biggest issues with this
assumption, as criticized by Tesla, is that it does not adhere to the laws of thermodynamics. If
matter were to bend in one direction there would need to be an equal and opposite bending of
something else in the other direction, which would cancel out the curvature effects. Additionally,
in this mathematical axiom, time is regarded as having physical properties (bending/warping/
dilating/contracting) when it is but a mental construct of the continuum of existence. The same
can be said for space; it does not ‘exist’ conventionally. It is merely a human conception
regarding seemingly discrete fields. Space is not a physical thing, neither is it a vacuum. Space is
the exact opposite of a vacuum. It is the unmanifest counterspace potential field, the ‘source’ if
you will for all dielectric and magnetic phenomena; encompassing everything we call matter and
energy. Matter is energy in motion, therefore it cannot “occupy space”. A fire does not exist
 Page 30 of 71

without the energy being released by the combustion of organic matter. The largest fallacy,
however, is in the assumption that the earth is currently moving at multiple vectors at once and
that indirectly because of it light is quantifiable and albeit so is matter, matter is not light. Matter
is simply extremely high frequency light; undulations in the aetheric medium at an extremely
high rate, causing an inertial pressure and aether-torsion respective to the elementary geometries
comprising each kind of matter. There are often cases where substances contain a lattice which is
clearly seen. This lattice is simply the framework inverse from which the light is emerging in
counter-space. The light is the area in which undulations of the aether field within filaments, sun,
or fire are of such high current; carry enough energy per wavelength so that the aether is quite
literally torn into shreds for a moment before regaining elastic continuum upon the disabling of
the light source. From each light source extends a circular wave-form of aetheric undulations.

The Wave-Function Collapse: No Wave-Particle Duality

Richard Feynman is quoted in his book QED saying; “…complex numbers were
multiplied and then added to produce a final amplitude for the event, whose square is the
probability of the event. It is to be emphasized that no matter how many amplitudes we draw,
add or multiply, our objective is to calculate a single final amplitude for the event. Mistakes are
often made by physics students at first because they do not keep this important point in mind.
They work for so long analyzing events involving a single photon that they begin to think that
the wave function or amplitude is somehow associated with the photon. But these amplitudes are
probability amplitudes, that give, when squared, the probability of the complete event. Keeping
this principle in mind should help the student avoid being confused by things such as the
“collapse of the wave function” and similar magic.”

By collapsing the wave-function, Feynman implies, one denies an essential aspect of

Einstein’s theory of quantum mechanics; the wave-particle dual-nature of light. Light is in fact a
wave, and as detailed further in this text, the only experiment which is used to support the wave-
particle duality has been grossly misinterpreted. Reconciling light and matter as wave-forms and
geometrical patterns produced by microscopic wave-forms kept under infinitesimal oscillatory
motion, respectively, we find that their different constitutions are closer to each other than we are
told and that, they both arise from the same medium; which is a plenum. A continuum of endless
energy, which can be accessed as well as employed in the transmission of disturbances along it,
which comprises every facet of world communications systems.

The ideas that a photon and an electron are particles are admittedly erroneous. This has
never been proven observably let alone empirically. Science has replaced the quest for a
structurally-stable, experimentally-supported absolute reality with a lingering search for
individualized suppositions and mathematical abstractions. A mathematical theory is rendered
meaningless lest it has structure on physical reality. That which is true cannot rely on
probabilities alone, for Truth is absolute. Endless hours are spent by highly proficient and well-
educated scientific men and women on trivial pursuits within an ever-expanding system of
 Page 31 of 71

illusion and nihilism. The idea that there is uncertainty in every atomic outcome does not fit the
rhetoric that matter is composed of atomic particles; proton, neutron, electron, and that light is
composed of discrete packets of photons. This atomistic narrative has been enforced upon by
scientific authority since ancient greek times, and it has been overthrown and re-enthroned
countless times.

Gravity: The Glue Binding Heliocentric and Atomic Theories

Together is Water-Soluble

The patterns of primary solar rays through which heavenly bodies are compelled to
follow as they rotate due west in the sky, especially those of the wandering stars, are also
attributable to the attraction of dense objects towards the earth. Nikola Tesla was the first to
describe this phenomenon through his term ‘primary solar rays’ which constantly cascade down
from the stars. This phenomenon along with the upward magnetic force is what gives rise to all
cyclical motions experienced by what we refer to as ‘atoms’ or indivisible elemental units of
‘matter’. However, everything that matters is not made of matter. What truly matters is the
spiritual; the soul. The Sun rays and the heat it emanates, as well as the Moon’s rays and the cold
emanated by them are merely emergent phenomena. The Sun is not hot inside, just as the moon
is not cold inside. They are both windows into source light, which is still, and thus cannot have
any properties as matter can; such as heat, conductivity, viscosity, density, etc.

Inherently, however, nothing is indivisible as all is energy in motion and neither energy
nor motion can be discretely quantified lest in the mind of an atomist. Elemental units can be
better interpreted as toroidally-shaped energy fields that within ponderable matter are held
together in a lattice or another form of aetheric pressure. This pressure differential can be seen to
exist perpendicularly and proportionally to the intramolecular undulations, likely in the form of
standing waves, set in motion from an extremely high capacitance for aetheric flux originating
from the centripetally converging cascading primary solar rays. These rays are sent down from
the heavens, starting at the fixed stars, then to the wandering stars, then through Venus and
Mercury, and consequently, through the Sun and Moon. This cascading light is, after giving life,
motion, heat, creation and existence to earth (from the dielectric) slowly penetrates deep into the
earth to be cast back to the Source in between Pater/Allah/Deus and Mater/Terra/Gaea from the
moon. It is very hot in its journey and receives a baptism of fire.

Gravity in modern quantum mechanics is seen as an emergent phenomenon. Gravitational

‘waves’ are a mathematical convenience, not a quantifiable attribute of mutual mass acceleration.
Gravity is not a force. Gravity is the acceleration of aetheric torus pressure fields (existing as
standing waves within the aether) achieved through electrostatic discharges in centripetal
convergent form. Just as magnetism is the acceleration of mass that has been given aether spin
 Page 32 of 71

and that contains a high dielectric capacitance for transverse aetheric electromagnetic
undulations.

The work of Henry Cavendish was misinterpreted and extrapolated beyond reason in
Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity and relativity. Electrostatic forces are responsible for the
Cavendish experiment’s supposed phenomena of two masses ‘gravitating’ toward each other
slowly and over a long period of time. Hence why the data yields in oscillation; electrostatic
disturbances caused by sky patterns can speed up or slow down the attraction of each of the two
spheres. A replication of the Cavendish experiment in which there is added experimental control
through the surveillance of atmospheric electrostatic leaders during the length of the entire
experiment could shed light on the oscillatory and seemingly random results of the traditional
experiment.

The equivalence equation was essential for the eclipse of the nihilistic atomist theories
over Aristotelian logic, which was enforced into ‘law’ by the scientism church over the wave
theories of light proposed by Maxwell, Kelvin, Tesla, Young, Michelson, Morley, Huygens,
Dollard,Wheeler, and many other notable figures at the time and present. However, this equation,
albeit essential, is not the keystone. Think of the letter ‘G’, what does it mean to you? We will
discuss some meanings later, I am speaking of the occult meaning of the letter G, in terms of the
unnamed groups of societal, economic and governmental influence. They are a set of architects
which fulfill in the material world the agenda within the lower worlds, which currently govern
most of human society on our third physical plane of existence; which itself consists of three
dimensions; up:down, left:right, and front:back, or simply; X,Y,Z. Each plane out of the total
possible seven consists in itself of multiple dimensions; possibly in a logarithmic increase in
dimensions with each ascending plane. None are like each other, and it is possible that there are
fewer. Perhaps a thorough analysis of the Bible and other ancient sacred scriptures can reveal
this. Though it is not entirely relevant for the subject of gravity. All metaphysical speculation
aside, the earth and our universe are not exactly as we are told. The universe is geocentric, and
many know this, all noblemen, aristocrats, and brotherhood adepts and sages are taught this at
the upper echelons of their duty for the order.

Special relativity concerns the movement through space of two objects (observers) at
constant velocity in relation to one another. General relativity accounts for two objects moving at
different velocities and vectors in relation to one another. The generalization of the special theory
of relativity, so to allow the force of gravity to exist between two masses, is the crux for the
existence of space-time, relativity, gravity, and consequently, physical matter in elemental atoms
and light as discrete packets of photons ever dancing in entropy within the finite but unbounded
universe of materialists. Through this generalization, Einstein was able to dismiss laws that
would not permit the non-constant acceleration of two masses; the concept of accelerated
independent motion. This is the axiom, held together with gravity glue by its keystone, the
gravitational constant ‘G’, which allows for the infinite whirls of matter in infinitesimally small
orbits to exist within the heliocentric cosmology. In this convention, an object with an extremely
high acceleration would experience their surroundings distorting and warping (curving) around
 Page 33 of 71

them, as their movement through time exceeds the functional limit of the ‘c’ constant put forth by
Einstein for the speed of electromagnetic propagation; 3x10^8 meters/second. Through this
axiom Einstein claimed that space can be said to not only have properties, but also dilate or
contract inversely and equivalently to time. An object in motion and the notion of action at a
distance; induction, are both phenomena of aether torsion fields interacting and sending out/
receiving veritable ‘ropes’ or ‘tubes’ of force vector field, usually bipedal vortex toroidal fields,
which induce illumination, magnetization or dielectric acceleration along either, while
sometimes both, transverse or longitudinal wave-forms. Of course for a wave to exist there must
be a medium to support it. Waves are not a substantial ‘thing’ or quantifiable in any way other
than by focusing on certain aspects of them while ignoring others i.e. crests and troughs. This is,
as expounded upon in earlier chapters, the crux behind the ‘particle’ theories. Machines which
are attuned to detect wave-peaks (where most of the energy lies) and programmed to associate
them with particles will in fact ‘detect’ particles. However there has not been a non-generated/
AI-constructed photo of a particle and there can never be one. For one the Heisenberg
uncertainty principle and the measurement problem assert that it is not possible for a particle to
be seen because it will move or change its state if it is measured. This is another diversion,
because a wave-peak can never be isolated from the wave itself. Spacetime is neither flat nor
curved. “Space cannot be curved for it has no properties” -Nikola Tesla. Spacetime is an illusory
mathematical interpretation of the medium; counter-space (aether field).

The atomists who purport the existence of a heliocentric universe also argue that a
charge-carrying particle; the electron, must exist, and that it surrounds the ‘nucleus’ of a
positively and neutrally charged clump of particles discretely and quantifiably charged. Light is
also, in these theories, seen as discrete and quantifiable clusters of photons traveling in
longitudinal-wave fashion, when in fact light is the longitudinal undulation of the
electromagnetic aether medium, and not clumps of particles. It would be easy to suppose that
linear and longitudinal wave-forms are in fact discrete clusters of particles. Light is supposed to
be massless, although it can carry and transfer energy; primarily as heat. This property of light is
only an emergent property of the aether field as its subject to torsion and expansion. Through
expansion there is the generation of heat, through compression there is the nullification of heat.
As light expands the aether through its disturbance/undulation the counter-space plenum which
exists everywhere in the physical world, experiencing flux towards its gradient into the physical
spatial dimension. The aether is within and through every point of matter, which really are
simply human conventions, as all matter; rarefied and dense, is a continuum. The aether field
itself is considered to be a continuum. Scientism Authorities determined after the time of Tesla
that the aether does not exist, due to the fact that earth’s drag through it as it encircles the solar
system is undetectable. This is another fallacious claim that is clearly, as evident throughout this
work, axiomatic and based on a framework of falsehoods. The assumption that earth is moving,
and not fixed in its foundations as experiment and all ancient sacred scriptures tell us, ensures
that the aether cannot exist. If the earth is fixed and geocentric as our senses tell us, and as is
confirmed through geology, astrology, and true astronomy, then the interferometers should have
never detected drag in the first place. The aether exists, and the earth is still. This was the
alternative view when Michelson & Morley, Sagnac, Gale, and others determined that there was
 Page 34 of 71

likely only two possible options; 1] that the earth is moving and the aether does not exist & 2]
that the aether does exist and the earth is a fixed reference frame.

Particle theories fail to explain instantaneous action at a distance, the EPR paradox,
wireless power induction in a vacuum. Photons break Newton’s law of conservation of energy;
light slows down when passing through a semi-transparent medium such as water or a crystal
then ‘speeds back up’ upon its alleged ‘emittance’ from the opposite side. This phenomenon can
only be explained with the undulatory theory of light, wherein the index of refraction governs the
path-length of the light-wave and consequently the rate of induction. ‘Rate of induction’ is an
important distinction brought to my attention by field theorist Ken Wheeler, as intuitively, that
which is not physically moving from point A to point B cannot possibly have a ‘speed’. Speed
denotes that some ‘thing’ is moving, and to assume that light is corpuscular, and therefore
composed of ‘things’, as we have discussed, is highly erroneous for its own set of reasons.
The beginning of the corpuscular theories trace back to Democritus, the first greek in recorded
history to propose an atomic theory of the universe wherein everything was composed of
indivisible, quantifiable/discrete units. The main arguments which in the 19th century
successfully, though erroneously, eradicated the aether theory and with it the wave-theory of
light, were that light; a wave, could not possibly be polarized nor travel in a rectilinear fashion.
This is also a false assumption due to the fact that light can be polarized and double-polarized if
and only if it is comprised of waves.

What is Light?

The fact that light can be polarized is a testament of its ability to be influenced by
magnetic fields. Why is the sky blue? The upper layers of the atmosphere are composed of
mainly noble gases; Argon, Neon, Helium, etc. which can induce electromagnetic undulations as
electric currents from the sun and become ionized. Ionized Argon produces a ‘sky blue’ hue and
so do the other noble gasses. Thus, during daytime, the sun is not only directly transmitting light
and heat to the earth, but also indirectly ionizing inert/stable atmospheric noble gases to produce
the color of blue, and which in turn also illuminates the earth. This is why the sun’s light is
seemingly focused though illuminates in diffuse fashion.
Because light is affected by magnetic fields it is inferable through deductive logic that
light and magnetism are correlated phenomena. This was accepted even by Heliocentrists who
still understood the concept of the aether prior to its abolishment. In resonation with the claims
of the greatest field theorists of all time; Nikola Tesla, Christiaan Huygens, Albert Michelson,
Thomas Young, Eric Dollard, and Ken Wheeler, and even, surprisingly, Newton, attested that
light propagates in a manner akin to that of sound; through longitudinal wave-forms extending
out on all directions spherically and concentrically from the source. Akin to how different
frequencies and intensities of sound affect the amplitude and wavelength of its undulations to
produce different tones, different frequencies and intensities of light produce different colors and
luminous coefficients. Wheeler supposes that a magnetic field is divergent. This idea is coherent
 Page 35 of 71

with the fact that a magnets north pole is the source of centrifugally divergent flux lines which
encircle the magnetized object in a toroidal shape and eventually return to the center through
centripetally converging into the south pole.
Light arises from the sun, keeping the toroidal/hyperboloidal aether standing-wave
pressure field respective to each element’s frequency (spin, vibration/oscillation) in motion and
stable three-dimensional spatial low-elasticity zones (‘atums’ or indivisible elemental crystal-
units which due to their respective diamagnetic and dielectric effects adhere and interlock with
others like it at the correct temperature and pressure. From the atmosphere to the center of the
earth, there exists a pressure gradient which starts with the most rarefied, or noblest of gases;
nascent forms of hydrogen, which merely is an aetheric pressure field of a high vibration but
extremely low flux density, are the closest to the Primum Mobile. From them, denser hydrogen
and helium, neon and argon, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen and towards the plane of the Earth
denser forms of carbon and the rest of the elements are all deposited in a coherent density
gradient. Through the hot bottom of the earth all ‘matter’ or toroidal aetheric ‘pressure’ fields
undergo inertial expansion until built-up pressure/charge/frequency is released or discharged.
Once this light is made void of motion it returns to source through the moon. The Sun and the
Moon are the sun and daughter of the Sky Father and the Earth Mother. The Heavenly Father
(Pater Caelo in Latin) is the force behind the metaphorical ‘sacred seed’, descending in the form
of generative patterns of light from all the celestial luminaries as a hyperboloidal vortex field of
centripetal convergence and Mother Earth (Terra Mater) receives these seeds in her womb, which
bears a toroidal geometry, and hence gives rise to matter. Motion (patterns) and matter comprise
magnitude.(Mater=Matter) (Pater=Pattern).

The Double-Slit Experiment

Light is said to exist as a wave-particle duality due to Fresnel’s interpretation of Young’s
double slit experiment. The double-slit experiment perfected by Thomas Young demonstrated in
full scope the wave-nature of light. This result is non-congruent with the claims of atomists and
heliocentrists. British polymath who made notable contributions to the fields of vision, light,
solid mechanics, energy, physiology, language, musical harmony, and Egyptology. Famous for
Young’s double slits; interference experiment, and for deciphering the rosetta stone.
Young had first read Newton’s Opticks in 1790 at age 17, and had admired Newton’s
work. By 1800 Young saw some problems with Newton’s corpuscular theory. For instance, he
noticed that at interfaces such as that between air and water, some light is reflected and some is
refracted, but the corpuscular theory can’t easily explain why that happens. The corpuscular
theory also has trouble explaining why different colors of light are refracted to different degrees,
Young noted.
Sound was known to be a compression wave in air; Young thought light might be similar.
He noticed that when two waves of sound cross, they interfere with each other, producing beats.
While he didn’t immediately look for the optical equivalent of beats, he began to realize that
light might exhibit interference phenomena as well.
 Page 36 of 71

In May of 1801, while pondering some of Newton’s experiments, Young came up with
the basic idea for the now-famous double-slit experiment to demonstrate the interference of light
waves. The demonstration would provide solid evidence that light was a wave, not a particle.
In the first version of the experiment, Young actually didn’t use two slits, but rather a
single thin card. He covered a window with a piece of paper with a tiny hole in it. A thin beam of
light passed through the hole. He held the card in the light beam, splitting the beam in two. Light
passing on one side of the card interfered with light from the other side of the card to create
fringes, which Young observed on the opposite wall. Young also used his data to calculate the
wavelengths of different colors of light, coming very close to modern values.
In November 1801 Young presented his paper, titled “On the theory of light and color” to
the Royal Society. In that lecture, he described interference of light waves and the slit
experiment. He also presented an analogy with sound waves and with water waves, and even
developed a demonstration wave tank to show interference patterns in water. Despite Young’s
convincing experiment, people didn’t want to believe Newton was wrong. “Much as I venerate
the name of Newton, I am not therefore obliged to believe that he was infallible,” Young wrote in
response to one critic. Disappointed at the response to his research on light, Young decided to
focus on medicine, though he was never very successful as a physician. He did do some further
work in physics, and in 1807, Young published some of his lectures, including the double- slit
version of the interference experiment. There is in fact only one fundamental ‘particle’, though
nothing is a particle as defined by the common convention. All free neutrons become protons. All
elements are just energy fields compounded upon hydrogen, each of a subtler matter which is
subject to more downwards force; as in greater surface area of leaves move a tree more during a
storm.
Mass is not physical, as each proton; the fundamental and only nuclear “particle” is
merely a ‘holdfast’ or ‘hole’ through which magnitude is generated from magnetism; the upward
force. Electricity is the downward force, and both magnetism and electricity are modalities of the
dielectric field; the aether. This zero-point is where all mass derives its energy from. There is no
equivalence principle; as energy must be contained within undulations of the aether and cannot
exist without it. There can be no “waves of nothing”. Something must be undulating, although
the aether is not a thing, it is simply all there is. Things rise and emerge from it, only to descend
into it once more, as all is cyclical and impermanent, except for the singularity; the point-source
of creation. This is the Eternal One, Brahman, Io. It has always existed and always will. Io is the
universal monistic god of creation in Maori cosmogony and theology. It represents the will to
create the seed of light within the sea of darkness (Pō.). The heavens descend downwards in a
hyperboloidal geometry, the earth’s physical, three-dimensional ‘cavity/hollows’ has a toroidal
geometry. This is what gives rise to the motions of the celestial luminaries, which are cyclical yet
unchanging. The hyperboloid is the source and sink for the earth’s entire mass, which is kept
physical through the ever-running current of primary rays from the sun through the heavens and
down towards earth. Since the Moon’s light is cold, it is possible that it absorbs heat, hence
energy from the earth. Rather even, that it re-absorbs energy from the earth; the energy which
was imbued upon the earth from the sun’s rays throughout the day. This dynamic is both
cyclically finite and infinitely cyclical, as all else in nature. The motions of the sun and moon are
a direct result of the energy from the heavens creating downward electrostatic force upon them.
 Page 37 of 71

Each cycle is finite (day & night, life & death, summer & winter, spring & fall, high-tide & low-
tide, etc.) but the existence of cycles has been and always will be infinite, because the nature of
creation itself is infinite. Since they; all the heavenly bodies, are of a quintessential nature, we
can, for experimental, not theoretical purposes, assume them to be a highly noble form of
plasma. This would explain both their indifference for each other and ability to emanate light.
The Australian scientist and physicist R. Foster (1965) brought up the plasma moon hypothesis
during an interview with a local news television show (in 1965). He said that man cannot ever
possibly land on the moon because it is made of plasma. The hyperboloid and torus geometries,
as Tesla, Wheeler, and a rather good number of scientific individuals believe, a conjugate form of
these two geometries. [6]
Likewise, the bellows/Sheol ascends upwards through the center of the earth and into the
true center of the universe, beyond which lies the upper portion of the descending vortex/semi-
hyperboloid. The true center is directly between heaven and earth. This center is the source of the
aether; the quintessential toroidal field geometry of magnetism, which comprises the One
element of creation. From this primordial quintessence rises the four primordial elements; air,
fire, earth, and water. Air is the sky above, earth the ground below. Fire is the sun, water the
moon. The union of fire and water gives rise to the ‘bubble’ within which we live. One could say
it is the ‘boiling’ of the primordial waters which separates them, in a toroidal field of universal
magnitude. “Every mass has magnitude by definition.” -Wheeler. Magnitude is the magnetic
component of toroidal expansion, and every ‘proton’ bears this geometry. As we have discussed,
there is no such thing as an electron, nor are there neutrons. As Wheeler states, The ‘proton’ is
the only nuclear ‘particle’ because all free neutrons eventually turn into protons. This is because
there is constant positive flux from the heavens to the earth, and anything which has no net
charge eventually accumulates charge. All charge is positive. What we convene to be positive
and negative charges is in reality, as Walter Russell presents in The Universal One, the interplay
between charge and discharge, respectively.

The Aether Field: Unifying All Manifestations of Energy

The main object of a true unified field theory would be the understanding and consequent
symbiotic manipulation of the laws of nature. Through taking into account the aether and the
multiplicity of phenomena which spring forth from it, we are able to discern that all which
‘exists’ in the conventional sense must be composed of it. All matter is dielectric in nature; an
atom is ‘held in tension’ through oscillations in dielectric counter-spatial pressure, which create
spatial-flux zones of magnitude. What we call the electron probability field is really a spherical
standing wave with amplitude respective to the element (charge potential) at its core (what
science todays calls the proton). This core is the source for the counter-spatial oscillatory motion
which gives rise to the spatial standing waves, which again science attempts to quantify as
electrons but they can and will never find, let alone isolate an electron. All discharge (intra-
atomic) emanates from the central point of ‘positive charge’ through the aether and eventually
returns to it in a toroidal fashion. The torus is an enclosed, infinite loop; a sphere with an infinite
edge, hence why it is also called hypersphere. These, much like conventional standing waves in
 Page 38 of 71

light or sound are of an extremely high frequency. Much like in a Cymatics set-up; fine salt
sprinkled over a steel plate fitted on top of a speaker from which the frequency can be tuned to
generate different standing-wave patterns as the salt is compelled towards the areas of low
pressure. The ‘atoms’ within matter can be seen to undergo the same process as the salt, and
depending on the frequency of generative source energy giving rise to their three-dimensionally
unfolding existence they arrange themselves in different geometrical dielectric flux field
architectures, which dictate the material’s color, density, refractive index, and other general
perceived properties, which indeed are merely attributes. As nothing truly is other than the One
Source God of Creation; The Heavenly Father; Allah; Pater Caelo.
Light, magnetism, electricity, dielectricity, and static (moving charges) electricity are all
phenomena relating to, and arising from the aether field. This field is inter-dimensional, and
encompasses all four corners of our Earth. It cascades down from the firmament, starting at the
highest above and descending through the luminaries. Primary solar rays as referred to about by
Nikola Tesla are constant sources of generative radiation tricking down from the sky. These rays
come in different states of charge and give light and life to all beings and living systems on earth,
through the Moon and the Sun this energy is diffracted and reflected and focused in order to
supply the earth with adequate living faculties and arrangements, as courtesy of the Creator. A
wave cannot exist without an ocean to undulate. A sound wave cannot exist without gas pressures
to transmit longitudinal vibrations. A light wave cannot exist without an aetheric, ever-pervading
field underlying and composing all matter so to allow it to undulate through various different
transparent solid, liquid, and gaseous media while never interfering with itself, intersecting itself
without ever losing momentum. This aether then must be extremely rarefied and permeate all
forms of matter. The aether field is itself the unifying fabric which is set into torsion and tension
at extremely high frequencies to produce; give rise to matter in a form akin to standing waves.
This ‘matter’ really is not tangible or ponderable, it exists only as dielectric pressure differentials
within and of the aether field. Locked in extremely high-frequency oscillatory wave-motions,
some of higher inertial torque; ‘density’, than others.
Light, matter, magnetism, and electricity are all field-effect phenomena of the same
unifying substance and ultimately driven by the same force. The field cast from the heavenly
quintessence, the strictly aetheric realms at the vault of the heavens, drives the tides by imparting
upwards acceleration upon all of earth’s surface water. All water is composed of polar toroidal
inertial field-forms, which we may call molecules, and the force with which modern academia
attributes the downward acceleration of matter, is also responsible for the synchronous ‘pulling’
of the oceans. Pulling is an incorrect conception, this effect is more simply described as the
‘easing’ of what we attribute as gravitational force on behalf of the moon. The moon pulls more
strongly the side whence it resides, yet it still pulls, though weakly, on the opposite side. The
effect by which this happens is also simple and hyper-logical when approached from a geocentric
and geo-planarity perspective. The toroidal vault upon which the moon’s image is projected and
consequently focused in our sky as ionized hydrogen is the aetheric dimension upon which the
heavenly luminaries dwell. The moon is a projection/holographic image of this vault in its
entirety, hence its circular shape. The moon is said to have 9,137 craters, and the visible sky is
said to have 9,096 stars. The proximity of these values is statistically significant given that they
are claims by occult-order-controlled academic authorities such as Yale (Skull and Bones),
 Page 39 of 71

Harvard (Freemasonry), and most prestigious Ivy League schools. The moon’s craters have also
been reported to eject plasma, referred to as LTP’s (lunar transient phenomena) which could be
the rarefied essence of that which is incinerated in the chasm below the surface of the earth,
referred to as its bellows or Sheol. This would be possible because the earth itself, its physical
component bearing a toroidal geometry, is a manifestation of infinitely increasing magnitude
from a single point; where one end is immediately connected to the other through an absolute
center, around which our entire universe sits. This is the Universal One, YHWH, the Source of
all things astral and physical. Gravity is therefore not a force which causes heavenly bodies to
orbit around one-another. It is also not mutual-mass attraction by virtue of curved space-time, nor
the attraction of bodies towards each other with solely with respect to their density. Gravity in
the conventional sense is not responsible for the acceleration of all ‘solid’ objects towards the
earth. Each of these phenomena is attributed to different states of energy, torsion, or tension of
the aether field, although they are not all of the same kind. The downward acceleration is
attributed to the same force which drives the circular motions of all heavenly luminaries, and
depends upon the upward magnetic force and downward dielectric discharge which both
synchronously give rise to the cavity within which we live.

The following quote by Whittaker in his magnum-opus-worthy aether-history compendium

displays clearly the contradiction of a vacuum that is filled with ‘dark matter’: “With the
development of quantum electrodynamics, the vacuum has come to be regarded as the seat of the
“zero-point” oscillations in the magnetic field, of the “zero-point” fluctuations of electric charge
and current, and of a “polarization” corresponding to a dielectric constant different from unity. It
seems absurd to retain the name “vacuum” for an entity so rich in physical properties, and the
historical word “aether” may fitly be retained.” (Whitaker 1960). The “zero-point” which
Whitaker refers to is the null-aetheric pressure point within every elemental molecular substance,
which is in itself a microcosmic fractal of the Earth’s Still-Point mentioned above. Still-Point is a
rather scientific; descriptive and raw (absent of spirit/emotion) name to bestow upon the center
of everything, but this is done so that the metaphysics within this paper can be interpreted to its
full extent, and so the reader may make no mistake that the aim of presenting the information in
this work is not to establish another faith-based theological/religious, cosmological, and physical
model; as that is already extant and in full steam. The various references in this paper to
attributes of Creation and Divinity are merely my own extended interpretations of the raw,
empirical, and replicable quantitative and qualitative aspects of this research, and should not
sway readers from its core. I am confident that in time, this information shall find its way to all
who are ready for it, but that it will only nourish their souls to the extent that they are hungry.
There will be those that find their way through it without any or much judgement or prejudice,
and those will be rewarded with the framework for a sound model. I must state that this work is
not nearly complete, and the main purpose behind this book is to bring all the issues mentioned
into light with some synthesis. It is then that synthesis that should be expounded upon by those
who possess critical knowledge of the tenets of cosmology and physical science mentioned
within and through reading the insights in this book can contribute to this re-emerging body of
aether physics and ancient cosmology research. Molecules in the sense of the electrochemical
bonds that we observe when looking through a scanning discharge microscope are merely areas
 Page 40 of 71

where the discharge cannot go through due to the high charge capacitance of physical objects.
All matter holds charge, and really, is charge. For without a charge pressure-field in the aether to
create the high-density vibrations of matter and without the aether medium to sustain such
vibrations matter does not exist. Discharge (negative dielectric charge) wave-forms (electrons)
are oscillatory trophs.

ESP: Brain & Heart Waves, & the Aether

Modern academia refuses to touch ESP with a 10-foot pole. As Richard Feynman, a
renowned quantum physicist/relativist said; if ESP is true, then physics must be wrong
somewhere, because it cannot account for it. He said the same of astrology, which is explained
herein. ESP, and Astrology, both have in common the fact that their underlying mechanisms are
subtle energetic field disturbances. The brain produces waves of thought which radiate
spherically in all directions and are not bound by distance or time. The heart is constantly
generating the body’s electromagnetic field, through the iron-rich blood which runs through our
veins. There is digital imaging evidence; not the most convincing but notable, which concurs that
the body produces a toroidally-shaped auric field, as do trees and other organisms. This is the
same geometry of a coelom in development, we all start off as a bundle of cells but eventually a
cavity is formed on one side, which eventually extends out through the other side. The side on
which the cavity first forms differs between the mouth and the anus, depending on if you’re a
coral polyp or a human, respectively. All other animals are a variation of these two original forms
of fetal development. Imagine a donut on a table that is slightly stretched upwards on a vertical
axis. This is akin to the torus field geometry produced by humans and that humans and all other
animals start off as in the early fetal stage. This is when the tract that connects the mouth to the
anus is formed. Controlled opposition sources of online information such as Gaia and others of
the sort purport that the quantum field is the way in which everything is connected, but they are
not mathematicians. Little do they know that the word they are using is in itself contradictory. If
everything is quantized, then nothing is a field. Fields are wave phenomena.

Magnetism and Dielectric Charge/Discharge of the Aether

Lightning discharges throughout the earth’s surface cause it to accumulate a negative
charge. Lightning comes from clouds which contain positively-charged tops and negatively
charged bottoms, due to water droplets carrying down a negative charge as they condense;
absorb energy. Expanding expends energy, condensing absorbs it. Lightning discharges thus are
expending accumulated energy which causes the expansion and expulsion of dielectric and sound
pressure waves from which we observe and discern the phenomena. This expending of energy
occurs at the upward final stroke, which causes the lightning.
How can magnetism not be related to the same field through which light and heat are
transmitted when magnetic fields interact with both light and heat? Light is polarized in a
magnetic field, and gadolinium becomes a ferromagnet once the temperature reaches 10 degrees
below room temperature. Heat also is known to hamper all magnetic flux in a permanent magnet,
 Page 41 of 71

while extreme heat or cold can turn certain dielectrics into superconductors; with nullifying their
electrical resistance. These and other phenomena prove undoubtedly that all energy
manifestations and forces of nature are interconnected and composed of the same unifying field;
the Aether.
Boscovich viewed monads composing the indivisible structure of reality as operating
through a vis or force which determines their approach and recession towards one another as well
as the resultant acceleration of these material points. I believe this is exceptionally demonstrative
of the phenomena which scientists of today call gravitation. Physical objects are accelerated
toward the earth as they all contain a high (positive) internal (intramolecular) charge. This charge
not only keeps the elemental indivisible monads of a substance adhered to each other, but their
adherence and interactions vary widely respective to the charge within them, and consequently
so do their physical properties. Primary solar rays are constantly carrying a positive current of
electrostatic flux downwards and centripetally from the heavens towards the earth, which when
interacting with toroidal indivisible units, ‘drags’ them down along with it. Intuitively, as the
greater the number of weaves in a ship’s sail the more air it can divert, the closer the proximity of
each materia puncta, the greater the ‘positive’ charge (which scientists of today associate with
the nucleus or center-of-mass of every ‘atom’), the stronger it is repelled towards earth by the
positive solar rays, and consequently the faster the rate at which objects overcome gaseous
atmospheric drag. Dropping an empty 5-gallon tank and a full 5-gallon tank of water in a
vacuum we shall find that both reach the ground at the exact same time. Although the full tank
contains a much greater density, and thus proximity of its constituent monads which induce its
greater downward acceleration, it is being struck by the same number of primary positive rays as
the empty tank. Due to this fact, the empty tank, although having less force per volume, also
contains significantly less resistance per volume. The same can be said about the classic example
of a feather and a bowling ball simultaneously being dropped from the same distance inside a
vacuum chamber. They allegedly reach the ground at the same exact time.
Light, heat, magnetism, dielectricity, electrostatics, sound, plasma, and all other
phenomena to which modern academia accounts infinitesimally small yet discrete particles of
different attributes and compositions are actually all composed of the one unifying substance; the
aether.
It is through setting the aether in different vibrations/oscillations and strains that all
undulatory energy in motion is stored, transferred, or transformed; and thus all forms of
ponderable matter can created merely by their aether-field geometry. Anything that is aetheric in
substance will be affected by the currents which constantly flow down from the heavens to the
earth’s chasm. This negative charge upon the earth is what draws any and all matter by virtue of
the weak intramolecular (the aether penetrates all substances) electrostatic attraction. Gravity is
the downwards acceleration imparted upon all matter (all objects composed of standing-wave
oscillatory aether pressure-differentials), which by the nature of its existence alone exhibits
resistance to descending heavenly currents. The higher the wave potential, the greater its
resistance to heavenly rays, and thus the faster it will fall. A toroidal fractal-lattice unit of Cesium
for instance contains a greater total charge and thus creates the most drag against the downwards
atmospheric gradient, consequently descending faster, than a toroidal fractal-lattice unit of
Sodium. Comparing a falling bowling ball to a feather in regular pressure and temperature we
 Page 42 of 71

can see that the bowling ball, possessing a greater density and thus greater electrostatic resistance
(like a sail in a boat) to aetheric currents, weighing much more than the feather; falls first.
However, if they are dropped in a vacuum, the air resistance upon the feather relative to its
weight is notably higher than that of the bowling ball, and because the aether penetrates the
gasses which impede it faster than it pushes it down the feather falls slowly.
Gravity is perhaps the greatest scientific lie in the modern world. It stands as the
culmination of over 2000 years of reformation and oligarchical systematic power agglomeration.
However, the fact that the other leading pillar of the nihilistic doctrine of atomism is the
assumption that all that is real is that which can be quantized means that gravity stands forever
independently from the other keystone. If both keystones do not fit each other, the arc collapses.
If when looking at one the other falls short and vice versa the tension breaks and the center does
not hold. The fact that gravity will never be quantized attests in-and-of itself that it does not exist
conventionally. It is but a mathematical abstraction. All physical objects are imparted the same
downwards electrostatic force, which acts upon them at a function of their density and air
resistance, generating downwards acceleration. All matter is dielectric in nature; all elemental
‘indivisible’ toroidally-shaped lattice-units which give rise to an element’s aether torsion field are
bound by electrostatic forces. Modern atomism dares not explain what keeps electrons in orbit,
but it is the precise fact that the torsion fields of an element are electrostatic and notably,
polarized, that gives rise to their existence. The ‘negative charge’ could occur due to discharges
produced by the aether torsion, and the greater the discharge, the greater the aether torsion and
essentially the more counter-space is converted into physical energy which is kept in motion
exclusively by the motions and illumination of the sun, moon, and other heavenly bodies. As
much as it is kept in solid form by it, matter is constantly being willed down by this heavenly
force. It acts even on helium, which dares not touch the upper hydrogenous sub-heavens, even
hydrogen cannot penetrate the firmament. All matter by principle is and has magnitude, and this
idea I attribute to Ken Wheeler, who has truly been very helpful to me and all my work. I also
attribute equal consideration to my Kumu La’au Lapa’au; Traditional Hawaiian Medicine
Teacher, and he showed me the Kumulipo; the ancient Hawaiian genealogical chant of creation.
That, and learning the sacred truths inside the Bible and the cosmogonical creation of the earth
and its luminaries described in the scripture, this I learned from Pastor James. I have been deeply
drawn to magnetism and electricity since I could barely write, and ever since my childhood in
Brazil I have always sensed that there are greater mysteries about the true nature of the universe,
but never in a disciplined dissent of the mainstream doctrine, until it became inevitable. I always
just thought that we; as a society, had not ‘gotten there’ yet; a civilization without a clear reason
for its own existence, nor a way to live in harmony with its surroundings. This is the direct result
of the tireless programming instilled upon the minds of billions of people since youth for
centuries now. The axioms such as that some time ago humans were primitive cave-dwellers and
that not long before that we were, in every sense of the word, animals, sows the seed in the
vulnerable young mind for a nihilistic creation belief; asking ’where did it start’ rather than ‘what
(who) started it’ and most importantly ‘why do we exist’.
Since all is light, distinctions could be created in order to differentiate spectrums and
dimensions, however, this is not needed to reconcile the fact that light, heat, dielectricity,
magnetism, and gravitation are all different manifestations and states of the same unifying field.
 Page 43 of 71

The systematization of this field’s dimensions and spectrums used to be the primary foci of all
serious academic inquiries of physics. As of today, few have sailed against the current, notable
ones of which are credited in this work. The equivalence principle, wherein mass is equivalent to
energy, is merely a tangential way of exclaiming that matter is not physical at all, though
corpuscular theory has obscured the true meaning of this convention. The Lorentz contraction
hypothesis and its employment in Einstein’s relativity theory, has stood as absolute fact within
modern academia of physics. Light can be polarized, as young said, if it travels in transverse
waves, rather than longitudinal as most aether theorists and proponents for the undulatory theory
of light used to concur upon. What is proposed here is an undulatory theory of everything. As the
aether can only be set into motion as spherical waves and toroidal waves. The spherical waves
are counter-spatial while the toroidal waves are spatial. Matter is composed of toroidal wave-
fields of aether torsion. Light is also composed of aether-torsion wave-fields, however they are
spherical, and possibly as Thomas Young said, transverse in nature. If gravity is an accelerative
force, measured as a function of the curvature and “lensing” effect that a mass has on the three
dimensional spatio-temporal fabric around it. The surroundings is an ambiguous term in the
sciences because it implies an atmosphere. Earth has an atmosphere composed of mainly oxygen
and nitrogen, and with increasing altitudes we reach colder temperatures, as well as increasing
concentrations of lighter gasses, such as helium and hydrogen. Why does steel, when placed in a

Septentrion Maps

fig.6

Upper: Universi Orbis Descriptio, Universalio Cogniti Orbis Tabula.

Lower: Orbis Terrae Compendiosa Descriptio.
 Page 44 of 71

pool of mercury, float? It is submerged in the pool of liquid metal, but the mercury’s composite
geometry is more densely packed, despite being fluid. It has a tremendous amount of stored
energy. Hence it experiences greater drag from the atmospheric electrostatic currents which give
rise to its downward acceleration. What is it that is ‘tugging’? To determine this we mustn’t dive
into theoretical axioms and mathematical thought experiments. In the center of an atom exists the
answer to this age-old problem. We are taught an atom is mostly empty space. To-date, however,
the scientific establishment has failed to produce experimental proof of the 1% of matter that is
not empty space. It is therefore deducible that matter is entirely holographic in nature, composed
of fourth-dimensional patterns giving rise to intramolecular spin and in effect ‘rendering’ it in
three dimensions. These three-dimensional patterns are what we associate with particles, but they
are merely wave-forms of the aether field, not discrete or separate in any way from their
surroundings everything else in the universe, as everything rises from the same underlying field.

Heliocentrism: The Soul-Lure System

Heliocentrism teaches us that we orbit around the sun; hence its literal name; sun-centric.
Geocentrism; an earth-centric cosmological theory, states that every celestial body; the fixed &
wondering stars and the sun & the moon, all have elliptical and sometimes circular orbits around
the North Star; Polaris. Directly below which is the north pole. Circumnavigation of the earth has
only ever been achieved around the east-west axis. This latitudinal circumnavigation is possible

on both a geocentric, flat earth as it is on a spherical earth in ‘outer physical space’ (which as will
be expounded upon is not real). If for example a ship’s circumnavigation of the earth diameter is
roughly along the equatorial line, on a geocentric, azimuthal equidistant projection; which
interestingly is employed in radar & all other line-of-sight communications, including airline
guidance systems. The equator is a circle halfway between the arctic circle at the center and the
vast southern circumferential fringe on the edge. The edge is the icy Antarctic coastline explored
by government operations; Highjump (fittingly, as this coastline is in most places a sheer wall of
 Page 45 of 71

ice over 30 feet in height), Deep-

Freeze, and others, which in
themselves display evidence that the
Azimuthal Equidistant Projection.
[Fig.3] more closely resembles the
earth’s geography. If Antarctica is not
a continent at the bottom of the earth,
it is a wall surrounding it and thus
monumentally larger in circumference.
Antarctica’s circumference is so great
that it surrounds and encompasses all
the world’s oceans and continents.
Hence why the antarctic treaty and by
extension the arctic treaty which was
signed by 52 countries and which
prohibits any independent exploration
anywhere near the ‘edge’. It is
evidently clear that this treaty is
effective at its more extrinsic purpose,
which is still not known by the general
public; to prohibit anyone from interacting with the business of secret U.S. and Russian research
facilities, bases, and other organizations in the antarctic. This is known by many in the military
irrespective of rank but its operations are known only to the generals and other officials which
take part in them. Another reason for the treaty would be hiding the Hidden Northern Lands
further discussed below, and this is of utmost importance. However, the real reason the arctic and
antarctic treaties deem areas beyond a certain latitude north and south prohibited is because
through visiting both one could determine that the earth is not a sphere. The northern lands
would display the 24h sun phenomenon more intensely, and the fact that land exists there and not
ocean also supports the notion that modern cartography is incorrect. The southern circumference
would demonstrably deny any possibility earth being a sphere and Antarctica being a continent.
To circumnavigate the world with every single continent on the inside of your circular path of
travel, as one would when sailing parallel to the antarctic circumferential fringe, would render it
elementary to determine that its circumference is much greater than what is currently purported
by the scientific authorities that provide us with cartographical and geo-positioning services of
our Earth.
The Sun and the Moon are said to be local, perhaps around a few thousand miles up, and
they are polar opposites, being willed magnetically to evenly coat the earth realm with sunlight
and moonlight, both of which embody different properties and are needed in unison to ensure the
survival of life on Earth. Moonlight is cold, sunlight is hot, although, there is no distinction
between the two. They only differ in energy states. If you take a thermometer and measure a
moon-lit area, any area of non-moon-lit or ‘moon shade’ would be noticeably warmer than the
moon-lit area. This is not due to radiative cooling as scientism authorities would have you
believe. The easiest way to prove so and dismiss that common excuse is to put up a circle cut in
 Page 46 of 71

such a way that it forms an even shadow in 360 degrees for a measurable period of time, which
can then be calculated and compared. There should exist no difference between any two
measurements in the circumference of the apparatus if the entire area surrounding it has been
exposed to the same amount of sunlight and moonlight. Geocentrism also claims there is a
firmament or dome that encapsulates this realm, and the kingdom of the moon and the sun exists

Upper: Tibet, Japan, Hindu.

only within this wide-encompassing seemingly semi-solid barrier. Beyond this firmament there is
said to be the stars and planets. They differ in the sense that, according to various ancient
religious scriptures, the planets are referred to as “wondering stars”.
The sun is claimed to be 93 million miles away, and the moon is said to be 238,000 miles
away from the earth. In biblical and other religious scriptures, they are claimed to be the same
distance from the earth, as also our senses (which scientism propagandists love to shame upon
ironically through their own sense (or lack thereof). The only reason Galileo although no precise
measurement has yet been concluded upon, as least in the general public’s (in contrast with
esoteric) knowledge. All of these ancient civilizations did in many things, though. They
possessed far greater astronomical and scientific knowledge, and could portray the composition
 Page 47 of 71

of our earth with high degrees of complexity yet through simple arithmetic and symbology. Our
ancestors did not ponder on false axioms and self-verifying equations, which are simply
machines of thinking and often aren’t tuned to reflect the observational and replicable
phenomenal in our reality. So how is it that without telescopes the Dogon tribe was able to

Upper: Mercator Septentrion Map, Mercator World Map.

Lower: Typus Orbis Terrarum, Palazzo Farnese, Orbis Terra Compendiosa Descriptio.

identify and predict the arrival of Sirius B in the night sky, when neither planet is visible to the
naked eye? This is the same reason why highly skilled ancient Egyptian, Mayan, Aztec, and
Incan architects were able to construct their pyramids in extremely accurate and precise
alignment with the constellations.
If there exists a downward force, it is assumed that there would be an upward force at its
opposite pole. What use is associating kings with months, and pagan gods with days? The
cosmos is our earth’s innate and impeccably tuned spatio-temporal clock, where the pole star
serves as a reference to physical location. There is no solar system. We are encased by a large
blanketing of gasses and perhaps a metaphysical or actual dense dome. Some say there are
plasma rings beyond it, and that the Van Allen belts still rest beyond a semi-physical barrier.
Some say it is made of a noble crystal of water wherein its structure is not random, but fractal
and in the highest-energy lattice form of water.
 Page 48 of 71

Earth is not a flat disk in space as controlled opposition organizations and individuals that
purport a deliberate false view of geocentrism, such as The Flat Earth Society, Mark Sargent,
Rob Skiba, and countless others, simply to humiliate and discredit those honest, scientific men
who have, through following the fallacies in heliocentrism, inevitably arrived at geocentrism.
Newtonian gravity is said to occur instantaneously as an accelerative force between two
objects not only in the same vicinity but also, to some extent theoretically, at infinite distances
with the same speed. Einstein dispatched the aether from physics, and subsequently invented
time-space as the ‘fabric’ of the universe, while granting upon every ‘observer’ their own
reference-frame and by extension the power to curve this fabric with degrees proportional to
their density. He attempted to join Special Relativity, for which a description (not a true
explanation) was devised to describe all fundamental forces, with gravity, the only force left out
of the equation. To do this he created General Relativity, where the curvature of space-time is
defined as gravity, overthrowing the Newtonian concept of instantaneous attraction.
Albert Einstein on the concept of General Relativity: “The gravitational field has only a
relative existence… Because for an observer freely falling from the roof of a house -at least in
his immediate surroundings- there exists no gravitational field.” This quote depicts the erroneous
nature of his claims as Einstein’s first and second postulates comprising the theory of relativity
are both contradictory in-and-of themselves and innately paradoxical when reconciled as a
whole, as expounded upon in earlier chapters. With the earth being stationary, an observer free-
falling is surrounded by the heavenly-cascading potential (in a toroidal flux field architecture)
which acts upon his density and imparts upon it momentum towards the earth; that which we call
‘gravity’, but that really is the discharge (negative) ‘electrode’ in the heavenly polar descending
gradient, which again is manifest in a hyper-spherical geometry; in which akin to a magnetic
field seen through a ferrocell, if viewed from the side display a torus field geometry [fig.4] and
from above a Fibonacci or ‘flower-of-life’ circle with a ‘hole’ in the center. This center null-point
is the source for the magnet’s magnetic field. The equivalent to this center still-point (zero
aetheric fluctuations as evident by figure 4.) is the earth’s exact north pole. Anything beyond that
is speculative because as mentioned all areas beyond 60 degrees north latitude and south latitude
both cannot be ventured without a government chaperone and a serious set of imposing
restrictions. If working under a scientific organization with clearance for antarctic research one is
bound by their location and if they so choose to explore further south or anywhere outside their
field of study they would face serious monetary and disciplinal calamities. The nature of the
Northern Lands and especially of the central magnetic mountain referred to as the ‘Septentrion’
by Gerardus Mercator in figure 5 can be inferred from the seemingly religious iconography as
well as from the cartography and metaphysical/religious writings of ancient Vedic, Hebrew,
Muslim, Egyptian, Norse, Mayan, Olmec, and other civilizations. Many cultures refer to the
northern lands in their mandalas. Other than Muslims south of Mecca, a number of religions
teach to face north during prayer. All bestowing upon it the title ‘the land of a thousand names’.
It is possible that it envelops or comprises the central starting-place of humanity i.e. the garden
of eden. This is supported by the Bible [Gen. 2] in which four rivers descended from eden. Also,
peculiarly, every map of the arctic circle and of the earth from the 1300’s to the 1800’s which
showed with decent and impressive accuracy the world’s continents also depict four small
continents or islands surrounding a central mountain which itself is surrounded by a whirlpool
 Page 49 of 71

that encircles a “very tall black rock.” Literally the name given to it by Mercator: Rupes Nigra Et
Altissima. From this whirlpool there are four diverging river heads which run in between each of
the four central island-continents [fig.5].
This rock is known to be the central north pole (above) of earth’s magnetic field; where
all compasses point to. The four continents/islands surrounding this rock are now obscured from
all maps, but they can be seen in the above: 7-10. If this central mountain is indeed the platform
for ethereal heavenly planes which humans are barred from unless permitted by God’s angels,
and if by consequence the land directly ‘beneath’ or around it is in some way special to us and
our history it would make sense that it has been hidden from all recent maps and all information
on the Septentrion has been written off as nonsensical records on the behalf of all the otherwise
notably astute and accurate explorers such as Magellan, Cook, which ventured to the north.
The gravitational effect is the keystone within a philosophical tenet of special relativity;
general relativity, wherein the attraction between massive cosmic bodies is considered. Its
constant ‘G’ was derived from the cavendish experiment, where two large spheres on opposite
sides and ends of a rod fixed to a mount. Fixed to the same mount, two smaller spheres were
attached to a pivoting arrangement either in an upside down U-shape or rod.
In all instances that this result was replicated, the data were obtained in oscillation. If the
value for G is found within a quite generous frequency band, it is considered a ‘successful’
experiment. This common fallacy and infringement of the scientific method occurs not only due
to the fact that the results obtained from such an apparatus are inherently subjective, but also
especially as Einstein and various prominent mathematical philosophers at the time suggested,
because no matter where it is done on earth, this experiment could not account for the gravitation
between two bodies due to the fact that the electrostatic and intermolecular forces acting on it
from the environment would be, inevitably, interfering with the experiment. Einstein is quoted
saying that no motion of the earth could ever be detected. In this he takes into assumption the
fact that in an observers inertial reference frame, due to the fact that the world under his feet is
spinning in nine different directions, it is unable for him to feel any of its motion because he
himself is also spinning with it.
In this assumption he presumes that there exists a field beginning in the hydrogen ions in
the upper gaseous atmosphere through the following density gradient of helium, nitrogen,
oxygen, then hundreds of miles of liquid water and eventually calcite and silica and other denser
minerals with greater aetheric intramolecular spin and this field maintains such a gradient not
only in spite of, but due to the fact that the earth is a rotating body in a vacuum.
"The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and
Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal
justification. The two sentences, ‘the sun is at rest and the earth moves,’ or ‘the sun moves and
the earth is at rest,’ would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different
coordinate systems."
- Albert Einstein
This quote implies that heliocentric and geocentric views of the earth are two modalities,
or ways of interpreting, the same data. How is this possible? Well, it has been possible for a long
time. All the way back to ancient Greece, in fact, when Erastothenes used two sticks, miles apart,
and measured the angles of the shadows produced by both sticks, at specific times of the day, and
 Page 50 of 71

thereby determining, through a mathematical formula which derived the earth’s circumference,
given the sun is 93 million miles away. A closer sun (3000 miles) would cast the exact same
shadow on the two sticks, on a plane earth, as a 93-million-mile-away sun would on a spherical
earth. Certainly just as in relativity, as expounded upon in earlier chapters, in cosmology Einstein
leaves absolute truth up for interpretation, almost dependent on our choice. This displays in clear
detail the contradictory nature of most of what Einstein published. The earth being at rest and the
sun moving around it is a starkly different physical and metaphysical system than the opposite,
widely-accepted convention.
Gravitational phenomena are not separate from magnetism, light, heat, and other energy
manifestations. In fact, without gravity, such phenomena would not exist. A magnet has a
toroidal flux field of aether torsion exiting its south and entering its north pole.
The earth has a material flux field exiting through the Sheol and entering through the heavens.
This aether field flux causes a constant downward tendency which is imparted upon any object
whose mass is composed of same. For within substances which manifest magnetic fields, it is the
primary solar rays which, upon striking them, remove its dielectric component.
Time is a continuum. The quantifiable, tangible expression of time in modern arithmetic
implies that time is, in a way, physical, and hence that it can bend or warp, as purported through
the contraction conjectures of atomists in the 1900’s. Physics still refuses to admit that all waves
need a medium, but academic physics books from 1944 still concur that waves are disturbances
in a medium, still refusing to speak of the aether. The word, medium, has become so demonized,
that now they are forced to use the term field. Modern physics will never truly grasp the concept
of a field because they imagine fields as existing by virtue of the waves which are being
propagated, not the medium which itself must be undulating to produce them. They go as far as
calling this medium ‘the vacuum’, indicating that it is empty of substance, when in fact it is
where all magnitude extends from, and hence wherefrom all substance is bestowed its inertia to
even exist. It is far from empty, it is in fact full of unmanifest potential. It is the matrix which
upon experiencing torsion due to magnitude allows for the expansion of itself and manifestation
of its stillness into motion with respect to the formative geometrical pattern being expressed in
any physical substance. Each element is motion of this stillness at different oscillatory
frequencies and consequently different magnitudes of aether-torsion and expansion/contraction
conjugates.
A true unifying theory of physics and cosmology must, inherently, explain not only
gravitational, dielectric/electromagnetic, and electrostatic phenomena; but also geophysical &
meteorological processes, the motions of heavenly luminaries, and all possible chemical
reactions. It must explain why all compasses point towards true north, and notably; what it is
they are pointing to. Gravity is an emergent phenomenon of the aether field, as all other
undulations of same, and thus it cannot be explained nor accounted for without reconciliation of
all other phenomena which spring forth from it. Gravity is what wills rain drops to fall upon the
earth, but it is also what keeps the sun and moon in perfectly cyclical elliptical orbits around the
earth’s central axis.
The descending force begins at the highest point in the heavenly firmament, which sits
directly above the equatorial circumference. It then descends towards the center of the world as a
centripetal vortex, setting into motion all the heavenly bodies and consequently all geological
 Page 51 of 71

and meteorological processes,

including the the polar whirlpool
which, joining all oceans of the
world, draws water inwards
through the four rivers between
each continent. In the very center
of this whirlpool sits a tall, black,
magnetic mountain known by a
million names; meru is one that I
particularly enjoy. This mountain
is said to be 33 miles in
circumference. Thus, there is a
cross of water and a cross of land;
four deltas and four land masses
marks the eight-fold nature of the torus field of earth as a whole, which is what encompasses the
physical three dimensions and likely in outer shells, higher dimensions which are not separate
from our own but in a sense, fractal/holographic projections of it, which become increasingly
subtle with altitude. The downward force and the upward force; both being responsible for the
motion of heavenly bodies, also control by extension all processes which we attribute to the
effects of the luminaries; including the sun and moon. All celestial luminaries, and particularly
the sun and the moon, terraform the earth and give rise to plate dynamics, the tides, weather
patterns, and all life forms. All arise from the Source of all, which is the holiest place in the
universe, and lies at the very epicenter of the earth.

The Axis of Evil: Heliocentrism’s (Lambda CDM) weak spot.

“The "Axis of Evil" is a name given to
an anomaly in astronomical
observations of the cosmic microwave
background (CMB). The anomaly
appears to give the plane of the Solar
System and hence the location of Earth
a greater significance than might be
expected by chance – a result which
has been claimed to be evidence of a
departure from the Copernican
principle.” - Wikipedia: ‘Axis of Evil’
For some reason astronomers cannot
explain, microwave-scanning
telescopes and other means of probing
the ‘universe’ to understand its
composition and age have yielded
 Page 52 of 71

unexpected results, and shown that the cosmic background radiation has a symmetry to it that
seems to be dependent upon the earth’s ecliptic plane. This is easily explained by a geocentric
perspective; this cosmic radiation hitting the earth is entirely dependent upon the sun’s
movement above the earth. This would also explain why the top half of the CMB is slightly
cooler, as quoted by Paul Sutter: “It seems that the CMB is slightly cooler when viewed through
the "top half" of our solar system, and slightly warmer on the opposite side. I'm not talking
much; just a handful of microKelvin difference, but it's measurable and definitely there. Plus,
this peculiar relationship to our solar system is aligned with the quadrupole and octupole.” “But
when you look at CMB map, you also see that the structure that is observed, is in fact, in a weird
way, correlated with the plane of the earth around the sun. Is this Copernicus coming back to
haunt us? That's crazy. We're looking out at the whole universe. There's no way there should be a
correlation of structure with our motion of the earth around the sun – the plane of the earth
around the sun – the ecliptic. That would say we are truly the center of the universe.” - Lawrence
Krauss in a 2006 edge.org article.
As quoted in the space.com [29] article, the universe could care less what the earth is doing, so
why are there two multipoles in the CMB from the entire universe that align with the earth’s
ecliptic plane? There must be something missing in the cosmological model we currently take to
be true without question.

Anti-Gravity: No Crazier Than Flying Spiders.

The atmospheric potential gradient (APG) is an electric circuit between the earth and the
atmosphere maintained by thunderstorms through the constant, and for the most part, negative
lightning discharging all over the earth’s surface at any given time. This field exists globally in
the atmosphere with an average surface magnitude of 120 V m−1 pointing downward towards
the earth from the heavens.
Due to the accumulation of this charge potential the earth’s surface is then, under most
conditions, negatively charged compared to the atmosphere, which is generally positively
charged. During storms, however, the earth’s surface tends to build up positive charges which
when accumulated to a sufficient degree induce a discharge from the negatively-charged bottom
of storm clouds, which usually also have a positively-charged top. The positive electrostatic
charge manifesting on the earth’s surface during thunderstorms accumulates particularly well in
tall conductive objects; as they are not only far from the ground’s general negative charge, but
also allow charges to flow freely through them. During the discharge of lightning, positive
leaders are sent upwards through the conductive object to meet with the negative leaders from
the clouds, and it is only upon their union that a strong upward stroke/surge of high voltage and
current is formed. This final discharge is what gives rise to the light and sound wave-forms of
lightning and thunder, respectively. The tree-like fractal pattern which is in most cases from the
ground up is formed as the charges find the path of least ionization resistance in the gaseous
atmosphere. This extremely powerful discharge also generates extreme air pressures which
create the audible and revered sound of thunder. It is due to this continuous ‘dumping’ of
 Page 53 of 71

negative electricity unto the earth by storms all across it that its surface is negatively charged,
and that under usual conditions it serves as an electrostatic ground towards which the positive
charges in the atmosphere are constantly flowing. Just like a magnet can store and create single-
point aetheric (magnetic) flux, defined simply by cyclic dielectric and electric potentials
simultaneously charging and discharging each other as a torus field geometry, the ’primary solar
rays’ as referred to by Tesla create a ‘river’ or current and a gradient of electric potentials which
can be harnessed for imparting mechanical momentum upon an object that is inversely charged
with respect to its ‘flow’.
This phenomenon has been observed in nature when ballooning spiders, through
electrochemical and biological mechanisms, accumulate charges on a brush of silk strands spun
out and deployed from their spinnerets during optimal atmospheric electrostatic conditions.
These spiders contain trichobothria; electrosensitive hairs on their front limbs with which they
scan the earth’s Schumann resonance or APG to determine whether the electrostatic currents are
‘rideable’. After the ‘pre-flight check’ they stand on their front limbs and point their abdomen to
the sky, and begin simultaneously weaving out
many individual strands of silk to which they
impart electrostatic potentials of high ‘negative’
voltages (relative to their size) which nullify all
primary solar ray centripetal electrostatic
acceleration upon their mass. The lowest charge
needed (which could indicate the charge scale
used by the spider) has been determined in a study
under controlled zero-wind conditions to be
possibly as low as in the nanocoulomb-range.
Through charging each strand of silk with a
negative charge, they all repel each other while
simultaneously attracting the positive polarity of
the atmosphere. Notably, some strands in the
fringes of the ‘discharge brush’ are bent
downwards while they are all separated at the very
center, forming a curve and epicenter akin to that
of a torus field. This could indicate the field also
should repel the earth’s negative charge, but
interestingly it is possible that the spider attains a
relatively lesser positive charge in its body which
is lesser because it is not to attract the prevailing
negative charges of the earth but instead to induce
a counter-flow or sink of electrostatic potential Peter Gorham: University of Hawaii
within the body of the spider so that when the
negative discharge from the brush draws in positive charges into the body they are quickly
expelled out through the other end. They achieve this likely by using their main two limbs which
remain lowered and positively charged to achieve an effect akin to a piece of aluminum foil that
 Page 54 of 71

is rounded and negatively charged at the top

while concave (forming two sharp edges for
discharge (aetheric flux rarefaction) at the
bottom.
Thus it can be inferred that the
negative brush discharge from their strands
create a centrifugal electrostatic potential
which after compressing the aether through
drawing in an increased positive flux and
imparting this as electrical momentum in the
body of the spider akin to a capacitor
accumulating electric charge. However,
when the spider reaches its critical
capacitance, the centrifugally divergent field
of aetheric compression generated by the
brush envelops the spider’s body and folds
inwards to centripetally converging at the
two front limbs. This causes an ‘outflow’ or
rather elevation upwards and out-feeding of

Peter Gorham: University of Hawaii

rarefied electric field lines in the APG, which impart mechanical upward momentum into the
spider’s body and oppose all ‘gravitational’ effects, which really are all attributed to
electrostatics. There is promise in this as a medium of propagation wherein machines could
through electrostatics deploy In the case of gravity for mutual-mass acceleration, it is due to
intermolecular electrostatic attraction. In the phenomena of downward acceleration towards the
earth, ‘physical’ matter exhibits some resistance to primary solar rays from the heavens, which
compose of a constant flux of electrostatic leaders that pass through objects while dragging them
along towards the earth, henceforth creating them; matter would not be stable were it not for the
constant supply of intramolecular oscillation and spin inertial energy from the primary solar rays.
Therefore, in order to select matter that can be attracted towards the inverse vectorial
direction as the current of these rays, one would have to look into conductive materials. There is
also a need for insulating materials, as the high electrostatic potentials produced need to be
stored and charged in some way so to encapsulate the vehicle in an inductive flow upwards as the
highly negative brush discharge creates a field of aetheric compression above the vehicle which
induces the centripetal influx and accumulation of the positive charge in the conductive materials
of the Spid3r. The bottom of the craft contains a highly positive direct-current ‘corona’
electrostatic discharge. This charge is nevertheless then drawn downwards centrifugally to exit
out through the underside of the vehicle hence repelling itself and causing aetheric rarefaction.
This is why there is zero air-drag or other forces acting upon the vehicle because the
vehicle itself is bending the very fabric from which gas and other particles are composed of. This
 Page 55 of 71

is what allows craft made with this technology to travel at incredible speeds. Gyroscopes are the
primary mechanisms of steering and control and they are directly and instantly fed even the
minutest of impulses from the mechanically-driven controls. The upward charge could be
produced through the use of multiple Van de Graaf generators or Wimshurst machines wired in
parallel such that the negative electrode; or in the case of the negative-polarity Van de Graaf, the
main electrode feeds into the top resonating primary pancake coil (made with 8 turns of 1/2-inch
diameter insulated copper wire) which induces a strong electrostatic field from the secondary
pancake coil (made with 80-300 turns of 2cm copper wire). The positive electrode on the high-
frequency electrostatic generators is grounded in the ship’s conductive hull. The electrostatic
discharges must be of extremely high frequency but must also carry out just enough current and
as low an amperage as possible for increased safety. The interior of the spid3r must be fully
insulated, while the exterior, with respect to its upwards and downwards sections, oppositely and
inversely conductive. That is, opposite of each other and as a whole inverse to that of the polarity
of charges from earth to the atmosphere.
Scarab beetles have elytra; frontal ‘wing-covers’, which they stick upwards during flight.
These are implicated in explaining the elusive disproportionate weight-to-wing ratio of many
insects. A possible reason could be that they produce electrostatic discharcharge alongside their
‘flapping’ ‘figure-8’ mechanical movements, and it has even been supposed and possibly
practically observed that and if an array of these wings is rotated super-symmetrically in such a
way they are capable of generating mechanical aetheric-rarefaction, drawing in primary solar
rays which impart upon them upward momentum, which can be used to raise a platform above
the ground, the underside of which bears hundreds of these elytra. This was claimed to be done
once, and can easily be found on any search engine, but has not been ‘visibly’ replicated since.
The high voltage electrostatic charge potentials necessary for replicating the effect
employed by arthropods in providing extra or all their lift as they fly can be generated by two
different Van de Graaf generators each identical except in the physical composition of its
essential parts, so to produce different potentials of charge. It is likely that the upper discharge
component of the bi-potential electrostatic field will need to be of a higher amplitude so that
upward lift is generated. However, through using a modulator or other electronic regulatory
device one can increase or decrease this amplitude at will to control the craft’s altitude. In the
positive (charge) one, the top roller is to be made of nylon, the belt of PVC, and the bottom roller
of silicone. In the negative generator, the top roller is to be silicone, the belt PVC, and the bottom
roller nylon. All this does is produce torsion in the aetheric (dielectric) components of the
insulating belt, allowing it to accept and release charge through frictionless as well as friction-
based transfer. When the entire system is operational, electrostatic leaders exit from the circular
or toroidal head-mount of the generator and are led upwards or downwards depending on their
charge potential. If it is a high potential; positive, they are drawn downwards, if it is a low
potential; negative, they are drawn upwards into the high-potential atmosphere.
The negative component discharges as apical inverse cone on top of the wide-radius
conical roof of the spid3r. The positive generator can produce weaker charges which are also
distributed between four equidistant coronal discharge areas on the underside of the spid3r.
These drag the mechanically compressed aether undulations downwards and back into the spid3r
through its attraction to its positive underside, converging as spirals along each circular coronal
 Page 56 of 71

diffusion repulsers. These charges enter and climb up through the central toroidal current cavity
of the spider which passengers have no access to. It allows the constant upward drag or levitation
which is imparted upon the spider as its top becomes highly negatively charged and bottom
weakly positively charged. The top would consist of negative discharging electrostatic
alternating currents of short period; with rapidly varying charge potentials, and the bottom of a
steady positive electrostatic discharge.
Ancient Hindu Vimanas are widely rumored and to some extent documented in Vedic
scripture; not the vaimanika Shastra, which was a human medium’s transmission, but in the rig
veda there is mention of flying chariots and floating cities. Vimanas are flying machines used
some 5,000-20,000 years ago. Some apparently were powered by thought while others;
particularly the more recent ones, were of exquisite technological capacity. This is just one of
many examples of flying vehicles. All UFO’s are earth-constructed and strictly earth-based
vehicles. One cannot enter other dimensions by physical means.
Eugene Podkletnov created ceramic superconducting discs demonstrating gravity-
shielding as well as a ‘focused gravity beam’ achieved by means of a stationary superconducting
unit coupled with a Marx generator. This was achieved due to the electrostatic nature of gravity.
He used superconducting discs to direct gravitational fields of force and the Marx H.V. generator
to dampen them so to decrease the downwards acceleration they impart upon anything in the
‘gravity-shield’.

Free Energy: Suppressed

Despite Support &
Simplicity.
The material in this chapter, just as
that in the previous one, each deserves its
own book entirely. They must, however, be
brought to light and the faster that is
accomplished the faster society will be
able to finally progress in technological
achievements and all its other endeavors.
An erroneous physical system not only
gives the precedent for scientists that
cannot wield the full-range of conceptual
intricacies and hence discard them
altogether. Turning inquisitive minds into
pre-programmed knowledge capacitors; set
to temporarily store and discard
knowledge as needed while taking no input
from faculties of reason, critical thinking, reductionism, and logic.
 Page 57 of 71

Free-Energy is not only possible, but exists all around us. In one of the most famous
quotes from Nikola Tesla, he exclaims that earth and atmosphere are teeming with untapped,
limitless energy, which can be used to power all aspects of industrial society. This is true because
the earth itself is a dynamo, as Tesla also proposed. It is constantly generating energy as the
heavenly bodies go about their elliptical orbits. The Sun and Moon are sources of energy and
light for earthly matter to take form,
but the cold light of the moon is
derived from the same source as the
hot light of the sun, as expounded
upon in earlier chapters.
Energy generation would
need to employ setting the aether in
steady-state vibrations through
pyramids and other hyper-
dimensional geometries. Through
over-unity the aether casts out or
diffuses more energy than is used to
create these vibrations. If set in
motion at a quickly alternating rate;
positive low voltage negative high
voltage, the aether becomes
increasingly rarefied at a rate
exponential to each change in
negative charge. The currents must be carried into capacitors and then into long-term storage or
distribution. The many boxes in the Egyptian pyramids could have been used as capacitors; water
inside and outside (filling them chamber in which they reside) of them.
Viktor Schauberger said that for the generation of free energy in any quantity, water must
be converted to noble water. This generates a manifold increase in growth; which if embedded in
the ground, can radiate growth enhancing forces down into the earth.
Pre-cataclysm international civilization inhabiting megalithic and highly advanced
dwellings such as in Kemet, Machu Picchu, the Olmec Empire, Amazonia, Northern Europe, and
others. Pyramids were used for a global free-energy transmission system which powered homes,
lights, flying vehicles, and all other electro-mechanical aether-based machines. Their pyramids
used an aquifer-based ground system for the accumulation of negative charge. The interior of the
pyramids were made of conductive limestone blocks containing crystal, while the exterior casing
was of a highly polished and finer tufa limestone which contains no magnesium or other
impurities, and acted as an insulator. The pyramid contains shafts throughout its interior which
are aligned to the relative position and movement of the heavenly luminaries. These shafts were
lined with granite blocks which were also dielectric to a degree so to allow the ionization of the
aether and (supposedly) the gas, water, copernicium, or mercury that flowed within the shafts, it
is still unclear to me which one. It is also posited by many alternative egyptologists &
archaeologists that the Great Pyramid of Egypt once had a gold capstone, which were likely
stolen some thousands of years ago after the fall of ancient Khemit. The capstone is the
 Page 58 of 71

pyramidion, and it is not surprising that gold (or gold-leafed conductive stone) was used as the
atmospheric end of the generator circuit produced by the pyramids. The Great Pyramid is not
only the oldest, but also the most intact. This is a theme observed throughout ancient advanced
megalithic constructions across the earth. This circuit is simply the concentration and
amplification of the earth’s natural atmospheric potential gradient as described in the gravity and
free-energy chapters. The gold tops is the point from which energy could be gathered due to the
highly negative discharge it could produce towards the heavens. The aquifer underneath the
pyramids renders them able to hold more charge at a time than bare ground would during natural
thunderstorms, where the same principles that are used for power generation are also employed
in the discharge and power degradation/transformation into energy that occurs during the audible
and visible (& non-visible) phenomena produced by lightning. Pyramids as power generators
work by concentrating the earth’s negative charge underneath them through the amplifying and
magnifying effect of their geometry with respect to electrostatic charge conduction and
induction. Even the name Pyra-mid, literally ‘fire in the middle’ attests to the energetic nature of
the pyramidal shape. Through connecting the capstone, by means of shafts wherein some
conductive ionized fluid is employed to ‘draw in’ the positive atmospheric electricity, which
temporarily would discharge into chambers which had large square blocks that could have served
as capacitors. The accumulation of positive electric potential from the atmosphere towards the

Sphinx tail & evidence of vertical (water)

erosion on Sphinx Enclosure; dating its
construction to at least 12,000 years ago
when it rained sufficiently in this area to erode
the banks of the enclosure to this extent.
 Page 59 of 71

aquifers would increase significantly before getting harvested by means of the fluid in which
they are contained being drained or directed towards again what seems to be a form of capacitor
bank for distribution and partial management of energy and or alternately a mechanism for long-
term power storage. It is clear that the ‘lids’ on such large andesitic granite blocks were ‘blown
off’, the entire roof is covered in a dark-goo in some areas within one of the Khafre pyramid’s
main chambers. The pyramids themselves could be said to have functioned like aetheric

capacitors storing a high positive charge potential in their limestone body, and In this hypothesis
the aquifer and granite, having a ‘negative’ charge; would be the discharge mechanism to which
the atmospheric positive electricity would be attracted. It is possible that this energy was
immediately stored in the body, and then diffused/transmitted as desired. The ultimate source for
the energy generated in the pyramids was a current. Negative ions rushed upwards while positive
ions from the heavens flowed into the pyramids.
The granite with which the chambers were constructed had an extremely high quartz
content, and is posited to have functioned as a transducer, where energy from the current was
collected. The high pressure of the million tonnes of masonry on top of the granite induced the
piezoelectric effect as the fluid caused the expansion of the shafts and chambers as it became
charged. It is said that the water which flowed through the great pyramid’s expansive
underground tunnel systems, upon meeting these condensed high energy primary solar rays, was
split into oxygen and hydrogen, which generated a tremendous amount of electrical energy.
 Page 60 of 71

Nikola Tesla derived

multiple systems for energy
harvesting or over-unity energy
generation and most of his truly
relevant patents pertinent to
these systems have been
classified for decades. What’s
left are many questionable and
sometimes anecdotal notes
regarding his machines, but they
are congruent within every
paradigm to have existed, and
most definitely, to now be in the
hands of the U.S. government.
Donald Trump’s uncle was the
FBI agent which seized Tesla’s
papers after his death. He found successful results at Wardenclyffe and Colorado Springs. At
wardenclyffe he was able to transmit pictures and sounds across different countries and he
employed a system similar to that used in the Egyptian pyramids. He placed his tower above an
aquifer from which he drew negative charges, which he then carried towards the top of the tower
possibly alternating them and causing atmospheric (heavenly/aetheric) electricity of a high
positive charge to flow faster and more focused than usually, yet directed perfectly self-similar to
their wave-form into the toroidal head of the tower. High frequency AC electrostatic potentials
can create energy yield if they are attuned to match the earths cavitational resonant frequency.
It is supposed that free-energy generation can be achieved through a rotating magnetic
field. This of course is negated by various ‘mainstream’ physics figure-heads on talk shows, TED
conferences, and YouTube videos. It perhaps could be achieved if the magnets are oriented in a
torus or hyperboloidal architecture, corresponding to the Phi ratio. This is an amplification ratio
and geometry of magnitude, thus energy from the single-point field could, if this rotating
apparatus is designed properly, be induced through a coil on the transmitting end and one on the
receiving end which then charges the induced current into a capacitor which can then discharge
into a storage system or immediately power an electrical load. As evident I have not deeply
researched energy generation because to me it is secondary at the moment. It does however carry
along with it archaeological and historical significance; humans used ‘free-energy’ which is just
energy from the zero-point field from which the pyramids were built to harvest energy used to
power the ancient pre-deluge civilizations from. All truly megalithic and perfect structures
around the world show evidence of advanced machining which could only have been done by
means of a high-speed ‘saw-like’ machine and even perfectly round core-drills, which also show
faint machining marks and symmetrical traces on the axis of rotation of the cylindrical core on
their otherwise perfectly smooth inner cavity. These features and the perfection and length of
these core-drills all indicate that these were created with advanced technology that was perhaps
better than that which we have today. Even today it takes a lot out of a diamond saw to drill
through andesitic granite, which has a hardness (Moh) rating ranging from 7.4 to 8 (Diamond is
 Page 61 of 71

10). At best they had meteorite or copper tools which would be easily grated into butter by the
kind of andesitic granite obtained from Aswan quarry.
Interestingly, the same geo-dynamical mechanism and ‘force’ if you will through which
‘anti-gravity’ is achieved is also behind one system of ‘free-energy’ generation. At least ‘free’ as
in the form of atmospheric electricity, constantly abundantly and infinitely cascading downwards
from the heavens. The APG (atmospheric potential gradient) consists of thousands of volts and a
 Page 62 of 71

fairly strong current between the positively charged upper atmosphere and the negatively
charged earth. This potential is maintained by constant lightning discharge throughout the earth,
as mentioned in the anti-gravity chapter, but its source is the Primum Mobile or (prime mover)
at the center of the highest heaven. That most sacred ‘place’, if you will assign it such a casual
convention, is God’s throne. This, as disclaimed throughout this book, is my own faith-based
interpretation of the metaphysical aspects of the universe. As all ancient advanced cultures
concurred, though, one cannot understand mechanical phenomena and natural science without a
spiritual foundation or framework. Stripping phenomena of their qualitative properties and
chasing after infinitesimal quantities will lead any scientific body into obscurity, prejudice, and
eventually, insanity and delusion. Hence, free-energy shall only be achieved when the aetheric
foundation of manifest physical phenomena is understood and employed in physical machines.
In other words, certain geometries in three-dimensions can be attuned to interact with the
aetheric/rarefied higher dimensions (such as that involved in electrostatic and magnetic
phenomena) and hence produce motion, stress, or strain upon them. This is the underlying
concept behind many apparatus of today, such as electromagnetic induction motors/dynamos and
all forms of MFA (magnetic field architecture), the necessary specific shape of coronal discharge
antennae, toroidal magnets with a north pole in the center, etc. An ancient example of the
exploitation of aetheric energy architecture which employed, and rather, magnified and stored the
electrostatic potential of the APG as mentioned above were the Egyptian pyramids and every
(megalithic) pyramid out of the hundreds and possibly thousands undiscovered worldwide above
and below sea-level. Pyramidal geometry can employed (instead of simply a sharp point for
coronal discharge from a conducting lead in the atmosphere held up by balloons or simply towers
or any other means) to allow for negative discharge and entrance of various positive leaders from
the upper atmosphere, which upon descending and concentrating into the pyramid through the
capstone can be harvested by means of large black granite capacitors Leyden arrays which the
Egyptians were known to have knowledge and possession of, respectively. Pyramids not only
magnify the amount of leaders at any given area on the Earth, which notably are highest at
central Ley-line nodes; what some new-age mysticism doctrines may refer to as the ‘earth’s
chakras’, which is not figuratively incorrect but can be misleading. This effect and current
strength is further amplified when the structure is oriented to true north, as that is where all APG-
flux originally makes its way downwards into the lower atmosphere from.
There may be other methods by which humans can extract energy from the aether, but the
simplest by far seems to construct a structure which can have a conductive contact with the
atmosphere, which bears a higher voltage as altitudes increases. The pyramid’s conductive inner
limestone and insulating granite exterior would have generated a direct APG electrostatic current
magnification vortex from sky to ground, beginning at its gold capstone and discharging into
water channels below, which could explain the method by which water was split into hydrogen in
large quantities and oxygen to generate energy, which is a theory proposed by Giza-Power-Plant
Hypothesis proponents such as renowned Archaeologists Brian Foerster and Graham Hancock.

The Great Pyramid remains one of the world’s great wonders, and that is in large due to
its megalithic nature, because if it were not perfectly built with extreme precision and accuracy,
and with megalithic 60-ton blocks, it would not have stood the test of time as it has. As
 Page 63 of 71

unmatched as it stands, it is not alone in its megalithic

glory; several ancient megalithic sites exist across the
world. They are what remains from the highly advanced,
global civilizations built by our ancient ancestors. Due to
their sheer scale and structural perfection, they have all
stood the test of millennia. The sphinx (pictured below),
was first] uncovered as a head above the sand by Egyptian
archaeologists. Upon further digging they found an entire
animal body within an enclosure meticulously carved out
of the bedrock.
It is a lesser-known fact that the sphinx has underground
chambers beneath it, and this fact is rendered even more
obvious by the various passageways and doorways that
have been fenced in and blocked off inhibiting one from

entering its subterranean spaces.

The Sphinx is a quintessential example of advanced ancient technology. Not only is the
Sphinx itself made of large limestone blocks, but the blocks of the same limestone bedrock that
were perfectly and evenly carved out to create its enclosure and body are featured adjacent to it
in what modern archaeology calls the ‘Valley Temple’ Not only does the Sphinx itself display the
engineering capabilities of those who built it, the water-weathering on the enclosure it sits within
tells us the age during which they lived, relative to the dates of its recent restorations.

Some of the blocks in the Valley Temple are over 60-80 tons. To not only move, but to
immaculately carve out and remove such blocks from the limestone sphinx enclosure with stone-
age technology (granted there would have been tremendous casualties in slave labor), is just
physically impossible. Granite is a very hard stone; andesitic granite featured all around the Giza
complex is largely from the Aswan quarry which is over 500 miles away. How could such
massive megalithic blocks, such as the 1,200-ton unfinished obelisk at Aswan, Egypt and those
already in place at Giza have been moved in their entirety across such far distances? Why build
things in such a massive scale in the first place? The sphinx has clear signs of reconstructions. Its
head is not original from the time of its genesis. It is likely that the sphinx had an even larger
 Page 64 of 71

megalithic head, some pose it was the god Anubis, others the god Sekhmet. Either way, it is
possible that the original head fell or was damaged by the cataclysms 12,000 years ago and then
during dynastic post-deluge times then carved out by the most killed slaves during the pharaonic
age. There were no pharaohs in ancient Egypt. Ancient Egypt; Khemit/kemet existed during pre-
deluge times, when humans used technology that is of source and the earth was in a golden age.
For the last 10,000 years, humans have been in a sort of dark age. It is nearing an end; a cyclical
trough, and has perhaps recently reached it during the conjunction between Jupiter and Saturn.

Another proof of the deluge mentioned not only in the Bible but also in its parent and
sibling texts is the notion of giants/nephilim. This would also explain how such large blocks
could be moved by sheer force alone, though it is more indicative that their contemporary races
had a technology which far surpassed physical force. Machines and tools based on single-point
energy principles. It is very likely that these sites all across the earth were found and inhabited
post-deluge and the surviving humans who scurried into arctic hermitage or underground abodes
came across them, in their sheer awe, deemed the most important and impressive ones as the
tombs of their highest nobility.

Also likely is the fact that there was not an exclusive point in time at which on earth there
existed ancient advanced civilizations, but rather, that there likely were eras separated by many
thousands of years. For instance, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman in Baalbek, Lebanon, among
other monoliths in Lebanon are some of the largest single pieces of stone ever carved, weighing
over one thousand tons. This is evidence of a highly advanced, perhaps even maybe anatomically
larger race of humans that lived circa 20-30 thousand years ago. Then it is evident, by water
erosion on the Sphinx, that some megaliths, possibly some (not all) of the Egyptian pyramids,
were at least 12,000 years old. It is also possible that the sphinx itself is much older, and that it
has been restored over the millennia. Blocks as those featured in Lebanon though provoke a
deeper history just in their sheer scale. This one stone would have been. Used as a brick for a
building with proportions beyond our comprehension. This is evidence of an extremely high
degree of accuracy and precision on a huge scale, and hence can only be achieved with
technology which even surpasses that of our own today.
In addition to the Stone of the Pregnant Woman, two other massive monoliths have been
uncovered in the same area, could these be bricks for inconceivably large buildings? Not only the
Bible, but various ancient texts; both sacred as well as ordinary; casual writings, display
evidence for both giants and pygmies. There seems to have been a period during which multiple
different kinds of humanoid species coexisted. They could have had wars, as well as
intermingled, and it is possible that we are the surviving gene-pool. Another possibility is that
other races were geographically isolated and were killed through the introduction of deadly
diseases which other races would bring with them; just as in the the relatively not-so-ancient
concept of colonialism.

These megaliths in Peru come from a long line of global megalithic builders.
Humans built these sites all over the world 12,000 years ago. They then got wiped off the map
and their civilizations buried underground or submerged beneath the sea by what seems to be a
 Page 65 of 71

global cataclysm and deluge, which occurred just before the last ice age. Then, around 8-10
thousand years later, they were found by the descendants of those who survived the massive
solar coronal discharges which melted granite and scorched many megaliths in not only Giza and
all of Egypt but Machu Picchu, Jordan, and various other places. Roughly two thousand years
after that and we are still able to visit these places and behold their grandeur, just as those
nomadic peoples who either were born high up in mountain range villages or; those who found
underground shelter or created tunnel systems, survived and re-populated these sites. It is clear
that all of them display reconstruction efforts, and that in none do recent attempts are
reconstruction arrive at a precision and scale nearing that used by the ancients. They had
advanced technology, not slave-labor. This scale would not be necessary and precision not
possible were it to be made by slaves chipping away at it with iron or at best meteorite tools.

Though fundamentally simple, this is a

more complex mechanism than was employed
to harvest the same APG current by German
engineers in 1922. (Right)
They used metallic balloons covered in gold-
plated conductive collector knobs, which collect
charge (“positive”) flux as it descends from high
potential (sky: +) to low potential (earth: -).
This was feasible but not pragmatic nor optimal.
Massive balloons in the sky could become an
eyesore as offensive to mother nature’s beauty
as are wires and telephone poles. This is where
a pyramid can be utilized. Also, research shall
be conducted into the effect of a deep-
grounding effect produced by drilling a hole
deep beneath bedrock and filling it with molten conductive metal. This way perhaps a lower
pyramid or other means of acquiring atmospheric potential energy would be necessary, which
would be optimal in the aesthetic sense. Alternately, instead of large metal toroidal towers; which
due to their geometry are not too displeasing to the eye, and instead of large shiny balloons
everywhere casting strange shadows, short, gold-capped granite pyramids as described above
would seem ideal in both the technical and aesthetic sense.

I will conclude this chapter with an excerpt from an insightful Quora question, which must be
viewed from the metaphysical perspective of this paper; i.e. what is an electron, a current, field,
etc. That said, the author of the answer provided a beautiful explanation for how thunderstorms
are formed (in his own language for the phenomena) and used an intuitive analogy for the space
between the similarly electrified clouds and the earth and the insulating air in between. This
‘atmospheric capacitor’ which covers the whole earth ‘breaks’ or allows discharges to go through
its insulating bodies facilitated by ionization patterns formed by descending primary solar rays
(what scientists call cosmic rays).
 Page 66 of 71

“What makes a lightning strike from ground up?

Jock McTavish
retired avionics tech, lifelong experimenter

Let’s clear up the words up and down, and the direction of electricity. Electricity is the flow of electrons. Electrons have a
negative charge. They move towards a positive charge, which can be relative or just less negative. But lightning is the second
phase of discharge. Its direction is clear, from cloud to ground, as the electrons seek the earth. But there is a first phase of
lightning, before the major discharge, only discovered in the last century with modern high speed cameras.

Lightning strikes in quite a few directions. And it is a bit complicated. It gathers charge and it depends upon random field
ionizing to pick a path of discharge. It mostly balances charge internal to the cloud. It can strike the ground, and it strikes into the
troposphere.
Lightning stems from accumulating charges that reach millions of volts as the violent wind in storm clouds literally rubs electrons
free from colliding water drops. So regions of the cloud, according to the directions of these wind currents, become charged. In
general the lower regions of the storm cloud take up a negative charge, and the top of the cloud correspondingly becomes
positive.
But the ground situation is different. As the electrons accumulate in the lower cloud regions below the updraft areas, the cloud
and ground below become a very large capacitor. The negative millions of volts above drives away electrons in the conducting
ground below, creating a positive charge. People report feeling the hair rising on their necks due to the rising electric field when
they are beneath such a cloud. And sometimes lightning rises from the ground.

For air is an insulator and only carries electricity when it becomes ionized or glowing. It takes 10–15,000 volts per cm before this
glowing sparking begins with air. Like the small sparks and shocks from removing a wool sweater. But a cloud even charged with
millions of volts, can’t ionize the air sufficiently to discharge over the great distances involved. Fields of only half the potential to
ionize are found typical of storm clouds. This has long been a riddle. That actual storm field measurements aren’t sufficient for
ionization of the air into lightning, yet lightning is surely there. Current research and high speed cameras have helped us further
understand lightning.
Two wondrous things happen to make possible a lightning strike. “Leaders” and Cosmic Rays.

Extremely high speed cameras and geiger tubes have found a relationship between lightning formation and cosmic rays. As
cosmic rays constantly shower our earth, they create small paths of ionized air
particles, which in the regions of a storm cloud’s extremely high voltage electric
fields, triggers the formation of plasma, or ionized atmospheric gas, somewhat
like the insides of a glowing neon sign, and triggers the strong electric fields into
ionization. Once started, these small ribbons of zig zag ionized and conducting
glowing air, begin to reach towards their opposite charge. They are called
“leaders”. With extremely fast cameras, we can now photograph these leaders
reaching erratically from the cloud towards the ground, and much more weakly,
reaching from the ground towards the cloud.
And when a leader hits ground, or a pair of leaders touch each other, a path of
conduction, sky to earth is made and the capacitor that is the cloud discharges
with a lightning bolt of millions of amperes.
So does the lightning strike down, or up? Well both actually. This describes the
common storm cloud, but positively charged storm clouds have been documented.
And lightning is observed discharging upwards from the charged regions of the
cloud in the troposphere. These discharges into space are a new subject of study,
and are called sprites.”(Below, Lower Right, Upper Right)
 Page 67 of 71

Quotes:
“Light is a longitudinal disturbance in the Ether...Light is a ‘sound wave’ in the Ether”- Nikola
Tesla
“This medium of propagation, the Ether must exist. This medium must be a prominent thought in
our investigations” Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism – J.C. Maxwell
“There appears to be in the minds of these (supposed) eminent men, some prejudice, or a priori
object against the hypothesis of a medium (the Ether) in which the phenomena of light, electrical
actions at a distance take place...the existence of a medium in which light is propagated. But in
all these theories (the insane Atomistic ones) the question naturally occurs: If something is
transmitted from one particle to another at distance, what is the condition of it after it has left
one particle and before it reaches another? If this something is the potential energy of the two
particles, as in Neumann’s theory, how are we to conceive of this energy existing in a point of
space, coinciding with neither one particle nor the other? In fact, whenever energy is transmitted
from one body to another in time, there must be a medium or substance in which the energy
exists after it leaves one body before it reaches the other, for energy, as Torricelli remarked, is a
‘quintessence of so subtle a nature that it cannot be contained in ANY vessel except in the inmost
substance of a thing (counterspace/ dielectricity, the Ether)’...” – J.C. Maxwell Treatise on
Electricity and Magnetism vol. II
“It is inconceivable that inanimate Matter should, without the mediation of something else,
which is not material, operate upon, and affect other matter without mutual contact. Gravity
should be innate, inherent and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a
distance thru a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their
action and course may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity that I
believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall
into (for) it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws; but
whether this agent be material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of my readers.” -
Sir Isaac Newton, Letters to Bentley, 1692
 Page 68 of 71

“The single greatest fear you can instill in any relativist or materialists is to ask them to define a
field, gravitational, magnetic, dielectric, or electric. The thousand pound gorilla in the room of
relativity is that action action-reactions and atomic operations are mediated by and thru a field
which no relativist can or dare define. All fields are the Ether. All fields are modalities of the
Ether without exception. Any conception of action at a distance without an Ether field as
mediator is illogical, senseless, and impossible.” – Ken Wheeler
“Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it
appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the
opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows
that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible - But even if it existed it would not
explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account
for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All
literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the
workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable
function it plays in the phenomena…” - Nikola Tesla
“My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the
entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the
least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed
by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.”
Tesla believed that the ether is thrown into "infinitesimal whirls" ("micro helices") at near the
speed of light, becoming ponderable matter.
When the force subsides and motion ceases, matter reverts to the ether.” - Nikola Tesla
“Tesla's ether was neither the "solid" ether with the "tenuity of steel" of Maxwell and Hertz, nor
the half-hearted, entrained, gaseous ether of Lorentz. Tesla's ether consisted of "carriers
immersed in an insulating fluid", which filled all space. Its properties varied according to
relative movement, the presence of mass, and the electric and magnetic environment.
Tesla's ether was rigidified by rapidly varying electrostatic forces, and was thereby involved in
gravitational effects, inertia, and momentum. Since the direction of propagation of electrostatic
currents radiates from the earth, the so-called force of gravity is toward earth.”[17] - Edgars
Alksnis
“Disregarding the unseen forces at play throughout human history and in every-day life
increases one’s susceptibility to deception and distraction on their behalf. If one is not
consciously ‘walking with God’ as in practicing every action consciously in alignment with the
goodness that is the source of all things, however they are willed to refer to it or pay reverence to
it, then it is quite likely that they are enslaved by lower parasitic disembodied aetheric life-forms,
which impair their inner vision and intuitive clarity.” - Vitor MI Nogueira
“The only thing that really matters is not matter, nor a thing at all.” - Vitor MI Nogueira
 Page 69 of 71

REFFERENCES
1] Einstein, A. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. June 30, 1905
2] Run Ze Cao. The Great Mistake: Relativity. June 16, 2015
3] Einstein, A. Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content? Sep. 27, 1905
4] Paradoxes of Special Relativity. 4-SR. University of Notre Dame.
5] Alfredo Macías, Abel Camacho. On the incompatibility between quantum theory and general
relativity. Physics Letters B. 663 99-102. Jan. 2008
6] Wheeler, Ken L. “Definitions of Nature & its Phenomena With A Primer On Cosmology &
Ontology.” 12-2020
7] Szabó, Lázló. Lorentz’s Theory and Special Relativity are Completely Identical. Theoretical
Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Department of History and Philosophy
of Science. Eötvös University, Budapest.
8] Ellman, Roger. The Einstein – Lorentz Dispute Revisited.The-Origin Foundation.
9] Plato Phaedo.
10] Einstein, A. Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Movement. 1905
11] Einstein, A. Concerning an Heuristic Point of View Toward the Emission and Transformation
of Light. March 17, 1905.
12] Huygens, Christiaan. Traité de la Lumière.
13] Marco Marmone-Capria. On the Incompatibility of Special Relativity and Quantum
Mechanics. Dipartimento di Matematica – via Vanvitelli, 1 – 06123 Perugia - Italy. September 6,
2018
14] Alfredo Macías, Abel Camacho. On the incompatibility between quantum theory and general
relativity. Departamento de Física, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, A.P.
55-534, México D.F. 09340, Mexico. April 3, 2008
15] Leibniz, William Gottfried. La Monadologie. 1714. Original French Publication: Erdmann
1840.
16] Dingle, Herbert. Science at the Crossroads. 1972. GogLiB. April 2018.
17] Edgars Alksnis. Ether-mediated space gravity: some considerations. World Institute for
Scientific Exploration. Jan. 2018
18] Gorham, Peter, Ballooning Spiders: The Case for Electrostatic Flight. Dept. of Physics and
Astronomy. Univ. of Hawaii, Manoa, HI 96822. November 2013.
19] Cho M, Neubauer P, Fahrenson C, Rechenberg I (2018) An observational study of ballooning
in large spiders: Nanoscale multifibers enable large spiders’ soaring flight. PLoS Biol 16(6):
e2004405.
20] Whittaker, E.T. A History of The Theories of Aether and Electricity. Dublin University Press.
1910
21] Electric Fields Elicit Ballooning in Spiders
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29983315/
22] Evidence for nanocoulomb charges on spider ballooning silk
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32795021/
 Page 70 of 71

23] The Importance of a Filament-like Structure in Aerial Dispersal and the Rarefaction Effect of
Air Molecules on a Nanoscale Fiber: Detailed Physics in Spiders' Ballooning
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32516363/
https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2004405
24] What is Lightning. https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/lightning/faq/
25] Cho M, Neubauer P, Fahrenson C, Rechenberg I (2018) An observational study of ballooning
in large spiders: Nanoscale multifibers enable large spiders’ soaring flight. PLoS Biol 16(6):
e2004405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.2004405
26] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-first-flying-saucer/#
27] https://libraries.mit.edu/collections/vail-collection/topics/electricity/atmospheric-electricity-
and-lightning-rods/
28] https://landartgenerator.org/blagi/archives/2148
29] https://www.space.com/37334-earth-ordinary-cosmological-axis-evil.html
30] https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41d7m63cflattened-toroidal-universe-We-
consider_fig3_1778421
31] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.13205.pdf
32] https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41d7m63c
33] http://www.thephysicsmill.com/2015/10/31/the-cmb-axis-of-evil-and-the-nature-of-
randomness/
34] http://www.thephysicsmill.com/2015/10/31/the-cmb-axis-of-evil-and-the-nature-of-
randomness/
35] http://thediagonal.com/2014/07/31/the-cosmological-axis-of-evil/
36] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.4758.pdf
37] https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2495
36] Rethinking_cosmology_Universe_expansion_may_not_be_uniform
37] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.1844.pdf
38] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.5051.pdf
39] https://briankoberlein.com/post/anomalous-anomalies/
40] https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-85-hubble-vs-the-big-
bang-8b26ef0fdfb6#.lhqhcz4ip
41] https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18685
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23301-planck-shows-almost-perfect-cosmos-plus-axis-
of-evil/
42] http://www.thephysicsmill.com/2015/10/31/the-cmb-axis-of-evil-and-the-nature-of-
randomness/
43] https://www.space.com/37334-earth-ordinary-cosmological-axis-evil.html
44] https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0502237.pdf
45] https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0307282.pdf
46] https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March05/Scott/Scott2.html
47] https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/
bb_cosmo_fluct.html#:~:text=The%20cosmic%20microwave%20background%20is,and%20cont
ent%20of%20the%20universe
48] https://wmap.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/
bb_tests_cmb.html#:~:text=Tests%20of%20Big%20Bang%3A%20The,microwave%20backgrou
nd%22%2C%20or%20CMB
 Page 71 of 71

49] https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-75-how-can-we-still-see-the-big-bang-
d7b438030083
50] https://www.nasa.gov/feature/making-sense-of-the-big-bang-wilkinson-microwave-
anisotropy-probe
51] https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/E/Epoch+Of+Recombination
52] https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/C/Cosmic+microwave+background
53] Planck_and_the_cosmic_microwave_background
54] http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm
55] http://research.iac.es/congreso/isapp2012//media/Longair-lectures/Longair1.pdf
56] https://www.astronomynotes.com/cosmolgy/
s3.htm#:~:text=The%20cosmological%20principle%20allows%20the,time%3B%20there%20is
%20no%20evolution
57] http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/cosmo/lectures/lec05.html
58] https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/66783
59] https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/C/Cosmology
60] https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/
61] https://www.britannica.com/topic/Wilkinson-Microwave-Anisotropy-Probe
62] https://phys.org/news/2012-12-wmap-team-results-based-years.html
63] https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5225