Cat Man
Cat Man
Cat Man
CATEGORY PERFORM;
> CATEGOR
DEFINmOt' MEASUf STRATEGII
,
-
eaorv Defi~ i n
I1 and purchasing decision trees and to determine SKUs in the category 1
. Cateaorv Role To communicate the category role determined during the strategic .
-
phase -. -
Â¥
;I
therefore what SKUs should be included in the define a category differently from its supplier(s). I
category'
I
Category definitions are becoming increasingly
varied and retailer specific over time and this
Category Definition can be critical to a retailer's tendency poses significant challenges to efficient
differentiation strategy because the way the data delivery as market information companies "1
retailer segments i t s category will impact i t s are asked to conform to individual retailer's I
market position. Consequently, a clear definitions.
understanding of the target shoppers' needs,
I
buying behaviour, and the inter-relationships Where a retailer and category adviser have
J
between product attributes that govern their determined the category definition, as long as
choices, is essential. there are no significant market changes, or new I
insights, the category definition only requires a
'sense check'. A half day workshop is usually
sufficient to allow for confirmation of the
structure and definition.
- * - ,.
-
Template D l How should the SKUs within the category be segmented, based on consumer decision trees
and therefore what SKUs should be included in the category?
Note: In terms of data delivery, it is critical that this step is agreed and signed off by both the retailer and,
supplier t o enable marketing information companies t o construct data in the required format in a timely
manner. Companies should be aware that there may be a time lag and potential additional costs for data
delivery associated with re-defining categories and re-creating data structures.
Role Objectives
Defines the image of the retailer
Very important to target shoppers
Leads all categories in terms of sales growth
High percentage of-.resource
- -
Note: Most seasonal categories, by their very nature, are likely to be 'destinationltrafficdrivers' and therefore should be treated as such, depending
upon their value.
t
- ,
straightforward, consisting o f only five Key AS. What are the key tactical drivers which rnay be
Business Questions: impacting segment performance?
I
u
I
I
I
the retailer's performance.
Template A1
i
I
Â
-
kgment A national I
Iperson households
!person households
4 person households
MI household group#
.eve1 of affluence
ifestyle
dentified t a w
-
ations I than fair share. For instance, if Competitor A has 25% market share at a national
level, but 35% at a category level, the simple ratio of 35%/25% indicates its I
I Additional
Analysis 1
strength and over performanceltrading in that category
Analysis on how competitors' performance have been changing over time
Analysis t o determine where residual spend is being lost from primary
Template A2
Conducting a year-on-year comparison of the - Sales value for the category and its make-up
category segments. This will be based on the - Gross margin and profit (where itcan be ' H: .
following elements: calculated) .- ,..
-Number of shopping trips Benchmarking the above elementsagainst b e . <
-Percent of trips which contain the category market, t o determine which segments under
(conversion rate) and over-perform, and, where possible. Index
-Average basket value (for those baskets that the year-on-year trends
contain the category)
ations
1
right number of shoppers buy the category
A view on the opportunities for improvement (number of trips, conversion etc.)
based on shoppers' spending on the category
I1
1 A view on how the segments are performing in relation t o the market year-on-year 1
A clear indication on where profit could be improved
Additional Drill down t o SKU level
Template A3
trips
1
ipping last y e a r that 1
lo of Index vs % of trips Index
'"ntain
vs last
"ear
Value
(basted
Index
Ã
trans- last year
.Won actions
Category
Sub Category
N.B. Volume and value data can be used here (e.g. in EDLP/Loss leader environments, volume data would be recommended).
W Penetration
W Frequenv
W Annual Spend
H Volume
Benchmark vs market
~
Penetra- lndexvs ; iual
end HI11
Index vs Frequency Index vs Transact- Index vs
last year last year ion size last p i last year
category
Sub Categoty
The Essential
A5: What are the key tactical drivers which may
be impacting segment performance?
It is important t o assess where, at a tactical level, To provide greatest insight, the retailer's
there may be a problem or opportunity. A high category tactics should be benchmarked against
level review of the category tactics can be the marketlchannel. This will ensure that early
performed t o assess the: focus can be given t o any appropriate tactics as
the development of the plan moves t o the 1
Range coverage tactical stage. I
D Pricing differentials
Merchandising
W Promotions
h Outputs 1 -
Performance of the sub-seqments in terms of the factorssile
t-
~
A view on whether the range is correct (based on sample market covg-, -el
Recommend-
ations
A view on price range (entry and exit) versus the market
A view on percentage space allocation versus the market
qs->t-*;
+.. . -;. %S--@y
gJq
. *,A+6$&p
.;+:.t.+?
- +.
.,. 4 > 7 ~ < i , * G~ p
%-,?c ?
+
;;.-
>. .
7 7
,, L ~#- '%t,. - - i.
<%-,
A < I1
A view on own label share versus market, where possible and reIe~i!ihY
Review suppliers' share of the categorylsegment t o get guidance on the supplier's
Analysis strategy (bearing in mind that this analysis alone will not be sufficient t o dire&
4 1
Template A5
Sub Cateaor
Segment
N.B. Grey shaded boxes indicate that data may not be available, howew where available, it will provide greater insight.
The views from each key question will be gathered using Table 6..
arowthhm~rovement~?
This stage quantifies the market opportunity Strategy and Category Assessment directions may
identified during the Category Assessment stage, identify different opportunities -these need to
which will be used to create the benchmark for be agreed and committed to, by both the
scorecard and on-going review at the sub- category team and senior management.
category and segment level.
Recommend- performance and confirm how the opportunity (financial) gap is likely to be filled, :
ations i.e. whether by shoppers spending more, or spending more often, or by
attracting new shoppers
Additional For some companies, additional measures may be included, e.g. asset utilisation-
Analysis can add further insights on the cosVsupply side (a menu that can be incorporated
into the performance tracking if required and relevant for the category is given
Appendix V )
Additional categoty specific measures may be used, where appropriate
(e.g. waste in fresh foods)
Template P I
No of trips (shoppers]
% of baskets that
contain category
Value transaction
size I
sales value I
1 Overtrade
N.6.
The variance between cun-ent perfotmance and tatyet performance will depend upon the role of the category
The measures must be consistent w&h the demand drivers Q.e. tmffic, tmnsaction etc). Under certain market c o n d m d u r n l7gut-e~may be
induded (e.g. introduction of ED& or 10s leader competition and price wars - as value and wluhe may tell d&rentstoties)
The anabis can be performed at the lower levels of sub- cat ego^ segment, etc.
Driver
% of shop trips
that contain
the category 1
Re@..-.
value r Gross margin Actual profit 1
profit
total store total #of (increase the
opportunities shOPpnlfreq) profit of each
basket)
--
Y
(Convert more (incwase size profii
shoppers to of total (increase the
the category transaction or profit of the
or more often] buy more often] catwry)
caWory)
I
Tot$ # 4 '
Range Focus on building Building baskets with Building sale of Convenience, loyalty, Les SKUdright
W J s with h'gh products h g h t less larger sizes, impul*, low price mRivity S U k higher turns,
enetratbn, high frequenry frequently families I- complexity
New products Build on manufacturers'awarenw, trial Initiativesto build lnitiatiies to meet loyal
shopper needs
Less failurdsp,
Less wasted lab~ur
1
investment
witching behaviour
I ononqmentsboughtbyta
o m elsewhere. POS to build tra
More space to w m e n b
bought by biq spenders.
More space to segmen
- bv, loval
bouaht . S ~ O. D D
-
Maximbe customer coverage of floor space. POGOpiomAe high D~splaysto explo~tcross
R e d ~ 00s
e margin products. POS for categov d e s Mlnlm~se
cross category purchases 005 on h~ghloyalty
Reduce OOS segmentdbr~nrk
Category Driver
I
Primary Focus
Tertiary Focus
0
on c ?gyfocus in ter rl
Recommend, - key drivers
- t h e overall store opportunity
the individual category strategy
, the product characteristics which should be used t o drive the strategy delive.,
Additional 1 NA-
Analysis 1
Each category review will need to determine what the retailer perceives zu category driver
and strategy should be. Thereafter, a focus on which elements of the tactical mix will deliver
the chosen driver is required.
For example, a category team may concentrate on three leveh offocus:
Primary focus: merchandising to improve the visibility of k g lines
Secondaryfocus: pricing mixfor non-pricesensitive SKUs
Tertiaryfocus: Range management (knowing this is already nearly correct)
Store Operations To confirm the impact of store roll-out and manage the roll-out timetable
To confirm the feasibility of tactical recommendations, especially regarding
1
timing for new product introductions and de-lists, promotional calendars,
merchandisina recommendations, etc.
To confirm the appropriateness of the plan and evaluate the extent of. icjt:Kj
disruption at store level , ''5 - ' ^
,<'
-A?.-d
To assess the additional resources required for major category changes=,,
To manage programme for major re-lays
Regional Directors1
Store Managers
ianagemer* -f chi----
Table 9: Guide for mtes and responsibilities
emplate TR1
Tier 1 analysts considers how appropkte the distribution is, in terms of density,
completeness of range, right rangefor right format,and whether segments, brands, and
SKUs are performing, including own label products where applicable.
SKUs and range productivity can be determined TR2a) 80120 SKU Cumulanve sales analysis
using a variety of methods. A toolkit consisting
of 3 analyses is provided here and practitioners
may choose between the options, but are
strongly urged t o run sense-checks on the results
prior t o making any de-list recommendation.
The 3 analyses are:
Template TR2b - May conduct drill-down analysis for brands using same table
Penetration and Traffic B u i l d w TP1. Whichproducts are highly elastic and require
Make use of segments, brands and SKUs with constant monitoring?
high reach which are purchased by target TP2. Whichproducts contribute to margt'n and where is
shoppers, but bought elsewhere. These should the opportunity? (vis-a-vis competitors'prices)
be added to the range. TP3.How does basepricing cornpare with promotional
Conversion: pricing (in the retailer and in the market)?
Use segments through to SKU level to build
conversion and, where possible, to convert
shoppers to the category.
Step 1: Segment category into different clusters Step 2: Group products according t o their
based on quality and market positioning elasticity
This is performed by segmenting the Although complex econometric
category by price. In markets where modelling can be used t o compute
there is already a premium, leader, elasticity, there are usually insufficient
secondary, tertiary, own brand pricing data points available. As a result, this
architecture (and also if products are assessment becomes more of a
stable in pricing terms, i.e. static), the qualitative assessment by the category
retailer can move t o Step 2. manager, inferred from ad-hoc research f
and consumer understanding. 1
1
II
The following three categories of elasticity should a
be identified:
Template T P ~'
Template TP2
% Sale! Gross
----:-
m,
I
Elasticity
factor
1 I --:--
I price I
Com~petiorA Competitor 1 Competitor C Gross matgin
fd-:LÂ¥.L
1 Totalled to
Additional N.A.
Analysis
Template TP3
Base price Promotional price
-
-
Category
Sub-Category
Sub-Category B
Current Compari
period son
period
current
period
1 1 1
Current Compari- Current Compari
period son
period
period son
Current
price
ndex to
market
1
I
Output Check of Pricing Tactic Recommendations Promotion -What is the optimal promotions mix
- Illustrative Pricing Options: for the Retailer?
The output recommendationsshould then be I
checked against the category strategy chosen by 'he Key Business Questions
the retailer:
Penetration and Traffic: TE1. What promotional activities are occurring in the
Use segments, brands and individual products market (competitor intensity and number of
which build price image promotions)?
Determine which highly elastic products must TE2. Do promotions in this category deliver real
have an absolutely correct price growth?
Conversion: TE3. Which SKUs deliver the greatest gro
Determine how price can be used t o promote TE4. Whatpromotional mechanics should be us
trial and increase purchase what times, to optimise the promotions mix?
S~endinaand basket size:
Focus on the big spender segments
Determine how price elasticity can be exploited
Lovalty and freauency:
Use pricing tools which attract loyal shoppers,
e.g. EDLP .
Use pricing t o encourage frequency of
purchase
' ^
promotions)? -^. ..,.
.
,
Template TE1
Frequency of promos
Intensity of promos
Mechanism
Timing (for calendar)
.. . .. Ñ
Output-
Insights1
Recommend- 1 ~romotionalsuccess
-Figure 9: output from Template TEZ
- Time
I
dditional teview sales split b. iutral, baseline, and incremental sales-
Analysis
1 Analysis
Template TE3
Compel
--
A
Competitor B
based on hlstorlcalpromotlons,byanalyslngthe
Hれ fa 寸O fo dl 廿e ent leveL Ofd@5countand a
「 「 「
Va le 可 ofp onnotlonalLqechanlCS
「 「
Outputs ・ A view on which combination of mechanics and discount deliver optimal segment lift
Insights/ A recommendation on promotional mechanic, feature/signage and display to deliver
ep
・
Template TE4
向・ I AnyPromo Feature Display F&D TPR AnyPromo Feature Display F&D TPR
ゴ
Output Check of Promotion Tactic - Illustrative
Promotion Options:
The output recommendations should then be
checked against the category strategy chosen by
the retailer:
encourage trial and increase spend loyal consumers and try to discourage
Spendina and basket size switching
・ Focus on big spender categories
・ Use mechanics that build spending e.g. cross
category promotions,link and multi-buys, pack
add-on ユ
The Merchandising Checklist, given below, should be used to verify each recommendation:
Is the merchandising in line with strategic positioning and global objectives and
does it focus on the "right" customer?
Does it meet the needs and expectations of the target consumers/shoppers?
Does it help reflect the category definition and give a fulllclear overview
of assortment choices available?
Does it reproduce the different consumerlshopper decision processes and sort mechanisms?
Have categories been co-located in a logical manner t o drive sales?
Does it ensure that all category locations are "right" so that shoppers find it easier t o shop by
need and impulse?
Have multi-purchase opportunities been provided?
Does it achieve the allocated roles?
To what extent does it contribute to achieving the marketing strategies for this category?
Have category signposts been used to trigger shoppers t o shop in a categorylsub-category?
To what extent have barriers been lifted?
Does merchandising focus on the key message in the store?
Does it create the right ambiencelenvironment associated with the category by the target
customer?
Courtesy of ECR Report "Howto implement Consumer Enthusiasm - Stra(60ic Consumer Value Management', facilitated by Roland Beyerand Partner
Tier 1 Solution has a simple mercbandis- ... - ------ - .imetrics, such as:
Rate of sale
Frequency ofpurchase
Minimum space thresholds
An understanding of operational constraints
A view on competitors' w e of space and adjacencies
Practicality of thefixtures and layout
Input from the shopper decision tree which determines whetherproducts are merchandised in
multzple locations
How c i n n / ~ / r f f/ I M / / ftvnrnnftnwa/sp~e
wid h~ w / S
--
Output, A pc
lf1
l 811111.
Insights1 A recommendation and the proposed shelf layout for products, constructed base
Recommend- upon the consumer decision tree using the merchandising software
ations A recommendation of promotional space use in line with the promotional calenda
A recommendation on signage (shelf displays, etc.)
A recommended workplan for space changes (cross-checked with merchandising 1;
and store operations)
Additional N.A.
lAnf'---.-
.
Output Check of Merchandising Tactic - . 5 .$FL
'AT- t
1 Ranging
TRI What exists in the market and are there
any SKUs missing?
TR2 What SKUs are unproductive and should
be deleted?
-1 ..-...
w..w..-
Once this summary table is completed, the next by the retailer, it should be followed, otherwise,
phase is implementation. An executive summary the retailer should ensure that the plans are
of the outputs and recommendations from each developed in a coherent manner so that they can
major stage should be presented t o senior be compared across categories and evaluated
management alongside the proposed high level against each other. Once the category team have
implementation plan. Where a pre-defined received senior executive sign off, it can move
structure exists for such plans, usually determined into implementation.
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 1(
Fair!Share!Opportunity!Gap!
- Identifies(the(dollar(value(for(a(retailer(if(they(were(able(to(achieve(overall(fair(
share(of(market(in(an(underdeveloped(category.(
- Calculation:(
(
Retailer’s(Point(Gap(*(Value(of(1(Share(Point(
(
Where…(
Retailer’s(Point(Gap(=((Retailer’s(overall(ACV(market(share(MINUS(the(
retailer’s(market(share(for(a(specific(category)(
And..(
Value(of(1(Share(Point(=((Total(market’s(category(dollars(DIVIDED(by(100)(
!
- Example:((Retailer(X’s(category(dollars(are($20M(and(the(overall(market’s(
category(dollars(are($100M,(then(Retailer(X’s(category(dollar(share(is(20%.((Further,(
Retailer(X(has(an(overall(25%(ACV(market(share.((The(category(gap(is(therefore(5(
points((25%(E(20%)(and(the(value(of(one(share(point(in(the(overall(market(is($1M(
($100M(/(100points).((So(the(opportunity(gap(value(is($5M(($1M(per(point(TIMES(5(
points(gap)(
(
Gross!Margin(((
- Difference(between(retail(price(and(the(cost(of(goods(sold(
- Also(known(as(gross(profit(
- Several(ways(to(calculate,(including:(
(
Retail(Price(–(Cost(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Retail(Dollars(x(Margin(%(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Units(Sold(–(Gross(Profit(per(Unit(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Gross!Margin!Return!on!Investment!(GMROI)(((
- Shows(relationship(between(total(dollar(operating(profits(and(the(average(
inventory(investment((at(full(retail)(by(combining(profitability(and(salesEtoEstock(
measures(
- Several(ways(to(calculate,(including:(
(
Gross(Margin(
Inventory(Cost((at(full(retail($)(
(
(
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 2(
Margin(%(
x(Turns(
100(–(Margin(%(
!
- Example:((If(the(gross(margin(dollars(is($100(and(the(inventory(dollars(at(full(retail(
is($60,(then(the(GMROI(is($1.33…($100/$75(=($1.33(
- NOTE:(The(difference(between(GMROI(and(GMROII((Gross(margin(return(on(
INVENTORY(investment)(is(that(the(inventory(cost(in(GMROI(is(at(full(retail(while(
the(inventory(cost(in(GMROII(is(at(cost.(
(
Gross!Margin!Return!on!Inventory!Investment!(GMROII)(((
- Shows(relationship(between(total(dollar(operating(profits(and(the(average(
inventory(investment((at(cost)(by(combining(profitability(and(salesEtoEstock(
measures(
- Several(ways(to(calculate,(including:(
(
Gross(Margin(
Inventory(Cost((at(cost)(
!
- Example:((If(the(gross(margin(dollars(is($100(and(the(inventory(dollars(at(cost(is(
$40,(then(the(GMROII(is($2.00…($100/$50(=($2.00(
- NOTE:(The(difference(between(GMROII(and(GMROI((Gross(margin(return(on(
investment)(is(that(the(inventory(cost(in(GMROII(is(at(cost(while(the(inventory(
cost(in(GMROI(is(at(full(retail.(
(
Gross!Profit(((
- Difference(between(retail(price(and(the(cost(of(goods(sold(
- Also(known(as(gross(margin(
- Several(ways(to(calculate,(including:(
(
Retail(Price(–(Cost(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Retail(Dollars(x(Margin(%(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Units(Sold(–(Gross(Profit(per(Unit(
Gross(Profit(Dollars(
(
Inventory!Turns!
- The(ratio(of(units(sold(vs.(unit(inventory(in(stock(
- Calculation:(
(
Annual(Unit(Sales(
Inventory(Units(to(Fill(Shelf(
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 3(
!
- Example:((If(the(shelf(holds(50(units(and(over(the(course(of(the(year(2,000(units(
were(sold,(this(would(equal(40(Inventory(Turns…(2,000(/(50(=(40(
!
Level!of!Discount!
- The(amount(of(discount(for(a(given(product(vs.(everyday(pricing(for(that(product,(
expressed(as(a(percentage.(
- Calculation:(
(
(NonEPromoted(Price(–(Promoted(Price)(
x(100(
(NonEPromoted(Price(
!
- Example:((If(Product(X’s(everyday(price(is($5.45(and(a(retailer(had(Product(X(on(
promotion(for($4.70,(then(the(level(of(discount(is(13.8%…((($5.45E
$4.70)/$5.45)*100(=(13.8%(
!
Margin!(same(as(Profit)(
- Expressed(as(dollars(or(percent(
- Can(also(be(expressed(as(Margin(Dollars(per(Unit((aka(“Penny(Profit)(
- Calculation:(
(
Retail(Price(–(Cost(
Retail(Price(
!
- Example:((If(Product(X’s(everyday(price(is($5.00(and(its(cost(to(the(retailer(was(
$4.25,(then(the(margin(is(15%...((($5.00(E($4.25)(/($5.00)(
!
Markup(((
- Difference(between(merchandise(costs(and(retail(selling(price.(
- Calculation:(
(
Retail(Price(–(Cost(
(
- Example:((If(Product(X’s(everyday(price(is($5.00(and(its(cost(to(the(retailer(was(
$4.25,(then(the(markup(is($0.75...(($5.00(E($4.25)(
!
Net!Profit(((
- Equals(gross(profit(minus(retail(operating(expenses(
(
Net!Profit!Before!Taxes(((
- Profit(earned(after(all(costs(have(been(deducted(
(
!
!
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 4(
!
Net!Profit!Margin(((
- Performance(measure(based(on(a(retailer's(net(profit(and(net(sales(
- It(is(equal(to(net(profit(divided(by(net(sales(
(
Net!Sales(((
- Revenues(received(by(a(retailer(during(a(given(time(period(after(deducting(
customer(returns,(markdowns,(and(employee(discounts(
(
Net!Worth(((
- Retailer's(assets(minus(its(liabilities(
(
NonKPromoted!Price!
- Reflects(the(average(product(price(in(retail(stores(when(NO(merchandising(
(displays,(features,(temporary(price(reductions)(was(in(effect.(
!
- Calculation:(
(
Total(NonEPromoted(Dollars(
Total(NonEPromoted(Units(
(
P&L!Equation!
((((((((((((Gross(Sales(
minus(Returns(&(Discounts(
equals(Net(Sales(
minus(Cost(of(Goods(Sold((COGS)(
equals(Gross(Profit(
minus(Operating(Expenses(
equals(Earning(before(Income(Tax(
minus(Income(Tax(
equals(Net(Income(or(Loss(
(
Price!Index(
- Helps(us(understand(one(price(vs.(another(
- For(example,(a(retailer’s(price(of(Product(X(indexed(against(the(overall(market’s(
price(for(Product(X(
- Calculation:(
(
Product’s(Price(in(Geography(1(
x(100(
Product’s(Price(in(Geography(2(
!
- Example:((If(Product(X’s(at(Retailer(Y(is($17.77(and(the(same(product’s(price(at(
Competitor(Z(is($16.27,(then(the(Retailer(Y’s(price(index(vs.(the(Competitor(Z(is(
109…(($17.77/$16.27)*100(=(109…(or(9%(higher(than(Competitor(Z.(
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 5(
!
Profit!(same(as(Margin)(
- Expressed(as(dollars(or(percent(
- Can(also(be(expressed(as(Margin(Dollars(per(Unit((aka(“Penny(Profit)(
- Calculation:(
(
Retail(Price(–(Cost(
( Retail(Price(
!
Promoted!Price(
- Reflects(the(average(product(price(in(retail(stores(when(ANY(merchandising(
(displays,(features,(temporary(price(reductions)(was(in(effect.(
(
- Calculation:(
(
Total(Promoted(Dollars(
Total(Promoted(Units(
(
Return!on!Net!Assets!(RONA)!
- Measures(fixed(asset(productivity(and(is(more(inclusive(than(GMROI(because(
RONA(looks(at(net(inventory(costs(which(includes(payment(terms,(etc.(versus(
GMROI(which(looks(at(gross(inventory(costs.(
- Calculation:(
!
Operating(Income(
Net(Assets(
(
Where...((
Operating(Income(=(Gross(Margin(–(Operating(Expenses(
Net(Assets(=(Inventory(+(Property,(Equipment,(etc.(
!
(
( (
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 6(
Additional(financial(resources((definitions(from(Investopedia.com):(
(
• Annual!Report!
o An(annual(publication(that(public(corporations(must(provide(to(shareholders(
to(describe(their(operations(and(financial(conditions.(The(front(part(of(the(
report(often(contains(an(impressive(combination(of(graphics,(photos(and(an(
accompanying(narrative,(all(of(which(chronicle(the(company's(activities(over(
the(past(year.(The(back(part(of(the(report(contains(detailed(financial(and(
operational(information.(
• Profit!&!Loss!(P&L)!Statement!
o A(financial(statement(that(summarizes(the(revenues,(costs(and(expenses(
incurred(during(a(specific(period(of(time(E(usually(a(fiscal(quarter(or(year.(These(
records(provide(information(that(shows(the(ability(of(a(company(to(generate(
profit(by(increasing(revenue(and(reducing(costs.(The(P&L(statement(is(also(
known(as(a("statement(of(profit(and(loss",(an("income(statement"(or(an(
"income(and(expense(statement".(
• Balance!Sheet!
o A(financial(statement(that(summarizes(a(company's(assets,(liabilities(and(
shareholders'(equity(at(a(specific(point(in(time.(These(three(balance(sheet(
segments(give(investors(an(idea(as(to(what(the(company(owns(and(owes,(as(
well(as(the(amount(invested(by(the(shareholders.(
• 10KK(
o A(comprehensive(summary(report(of(a(company's(performance(that(must(be(
submitted(annually(to(the(Securities(and(Exchange(Commission.(Typically,(the(
10EK(contains(much(more(detail(than(the(annual(report.(It(includes(information(
such(as(company(history,(organizational(structure,(equity,(holdings,(earnings(
per(share,(subsidiaries,(etc.(
(
Learning(Evolution,(LLC( 7(