[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
107 views1 page

De Guia vs. COMELEC G.R. No. 104712. May 06, 1992

Manuel de Guia petitions the Supreme Court to invalidate COMELEC resolutions regarding the apportionment of Sangguniang members for the 1992 elections. De Guia argues elections should be "at large" not "by district". The Court dismisses the petition, finding COMELEC correctly interpreted the relevant law, RA 7166. The Court notes RA 7166's purpose was to establish district apportionment, as shown in the explanatory note to the bill. Upholding COMELEC's resolutions furthers the legislative intent behind RA 7166.

Uploaded by

Popoy Solano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
107 views1 page

De Guia vs. COMELEC G.R. No. 104712. May 06, 1992

Manuel de Guia petitions the Supreme Court to invalidate COMELEC resolutions regarding the apportionment of Sangguniang members for the 1992 elections. De Guia argues elections should be "at large" not "by district". The Court dismisses the petition, finding COMELEC correctly interpreted the relevant law, RA 7166. The Court notes RA 7166's purpose was to establish district apportionment, as shown in the explanatory note to the bill. Upholding COMELEC's resolutions furthers the legislative intent behind RA 7166.

Uploaded by

Popoy Solano
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Manuel de Guia vs.

COMELEC
G.R. No. 104712. May 06, 1992

Facts: This is a petition for certiorari and prohibition file by Petitioner Manuel T. De Guia is


an incumbent Member of the Sangguniang Bayan of the Municipality of Parañ aque, Metro
Manila, assailing the validity and the enforcement by respondent Commission on Elections
(COMELEC) of its RESOLUTION NO. 2313, adopting rules and guidelines in the
apportionment, by district, of the number of elective members of the Sangguniang
Panlalawigan in provinces with only one (1) legislative district and the Sangguniang Bayan
of municipalities in the Metro Manila Area for the preparation of the Project of District
Apportionment by the Provincial Election Supervisors and Election Registrars (Annex "A",
Petition), RESOLUTION NO. 2379, approving the Project of District Apportionment
submitted pursuant to Resolution No. 2313 (Annex "B", Petition), and RESOLUTION UND.
92-010 holding that pars. (a), (b) and (c), and the first sentence of par. (d), all of Sec. 3, R.A.
7166, apply to the May 11, 1992 elections (Annex "C", Petition).
Petitioner imputes grave abuse of discretion to COMELEC in promulgating the
aforementioned resolutions, and maintained that election of Sanggunian members be “at
large” instead of “by district”.

Issue: Whether or not the petitioner’s interpretation of Sec.3 of R.A. 7166 is correct in
assailing the aforementioned COMELEC Resolutions.
Held: NO. Petition was dismissed for lack of merit
Spirit and purpose of the law – The reason for the promulgation of R.A. 7166 is shown in
the explanatory note of Senate Bill No. 1861, and that respondent COMELEC is cognizant of
its legislative intent.
No law is ever enacted that is intended to be meaningless, much less inutile. We must
therefore, as far as we can, divine its meaning, its significance, its reason for being. As it has
oft been held, the key to open the door to what the legislature intended which is vaguely
expressed in the language of a statute is its purpose or the reason which induced it to enact
the statute.

You might also like