High Yield Routines k8
High Yield Routines k8
H I G H -Y I E L D R O U T I N E S F O R G R A D E S K– 8
high-yield, effective mathematical routines.
ROUTINES
The easily implemented routines suggested in High-Yield Routines will provide teachers with
opportunities to enhance the content knowledge and mathematical practices of their students.
Classroom vignettes, from a variety of grade levels, illustrate how the routines may be used
effectively across many grade levels and the student work included provides a picture of what
teachers might expect from students. This book will prove to be a valuable resource for teachers both
r o
new and experienced.
Terry Goodman • Concordia College
High-Yield Routines is a book that should be owned by all elementary and middle school
mathematics teachers. It shows a quick and easy way to optimize precious classroom minutes,
infusing mathematics into otherwise non-mathematical routines. The connections to the Common
Core practice standards will help teachers address this important content throughout the day in ways
that are unexpected but highly productive. Grades
K–8
Rita Barger • University of Missouri-Kansas City
High-Yield Routines describes several mathematical routines that will create opportunities for
ANN MCCOY
differentiated instruction to take place naturally with students. The routines described in the
book allow each student to participate at his or her own level and to build upon existing knowledge
u t i
to develop a deeper understanding of the content. The routines are easy to implement and
classroom teachers at all grade levels will be able to utilize the routines to enhance the mathematics
understanding of students.
Jami Smith • Archie Middle School
n e
Joann Barnett is retired from the Ozark, MO, school district where she taught elementary and
middle school mathematics for nearly thirty years. She is now an adjunct instructor for mathematics
and mathematics education at Missouri State University and Ozarks Technical Community College.
Over the past thirteen years, she has been involved with various state and federal grants to provide
professional development for teachers.
Missouri State University and Ozarks Technical Community College, Springfield, MO
Emily Combs is in her fourteenth year as a middle school mathematics teacher at Clinton
Middle School, Clinton, MO. Over the past ten years she has participated in many professional EMILY COMBS
development projects including her role as co-principal investigator of a Mathematics and Science
Partnership Grant. She is interested in using learning trajectories to build accessible, mathematically
rich lessons to deepen mathematics understanding smoothly across grade levels.
Clinton Middle School, Clinton, MO
8/13 • 1.5K • VP
ISBN 978-0-87353-719-3
14405
NCTM
Ann McCoy
University of Central Missouri, Warrensburg, MO
Joann Barnett
Missouri State University and Ozarks Technical Community College,
Springfield, MO
Emily Combs
Clinton Middle School, Clinton, MO
Copyright © 2013 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., www.nctm.org. All rights reserved.
This material may not be copied or distributed electronically or in other formats without written permission from NCTM.
When forms, problems, or sample documents are included or are made available on
NCTM's website, their use is authorized for educational purposes by educations and
noncommercial or nonprofit entities that have purchased this book. Except for that
use, permission to photocopy or use material electronically from High-Yield Routines
must be obtained from www.copyright.com or by contacting the Copyright Clearance
Center Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400. CCC
is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of
users. Permission does not automatically extend to any items identified as reprinted
by permission of other publishers and copyright holders. Such items must be excluded
unless separate permissions are obtained. It will be the responsibility of the user to
identify such materials and obtain the permissions.
2
CHAPTER
1
APPENDIX
Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................ 1
Chapter 1. Today’s Number .................................................................... 5
Chapter 2. Mystery Number ................................................................. 13
Chapter 3. Alike and Different ..............................................................21
Chapter 4. Number Lines.......................................................................31
Chapter 5. Quick Images ...................................................................... 45
Chapter 6. Guess My Rule .................................................................... 55
Chapter 7. How Do You Know? ........................................................... 63
Chapter 8. Infusing Mathematics into Nonmathematical Routines ..... 73
Chapter 9. High Yield from Routines ................................................... 79
Appendix. Standards for Mathematical Practice .................................. 83
iii
CHAPTER
2
1
Introduction
1st Claire, a first grader, enters her classroom and hangs her
grade backpack in her assigned cubby. After placing her take-home
folder on her desk, she moves to the front of the classroom.
There she chooses a magnet in the shape of a banana and
places it under the Brought Lunch heading to indicate she
would not be eating school lunch since she brought a lunch
from home.
3rd Third graders Laurel and Cody are each working on a story
grade about a favorite memory. When they hear their teacher say,
“One, two,” they stop working, look at her, and reply, “Eyes
on you.” She tells the class to move to their conferencing
areas, so Laurel and Cody move to the couch—their assigned
area for the week. After the conferencing time ends, Cody
collects papers from the class.
Our classrooms are full of routines. Our students quickly learn the procedure
for taking attendance and lunch count, the procedure for assigning classroom
jobs, the procedure for lining up, and the procedure for collecting and distribut-
ing papers. The creation and implementation of routines brings a sense of pre-
dictability and comfort to our classrooms. Routines help with organization and
classroom management, and they help make transitions smooth. Although we
often think of routines as being used for organization, routines can also be used
to enhance instruction.
Many textbooks make suggestions and give directions for a variety of mathe-
matical routines. These mathematical routines are structured activities that, when
used consistently, can help students gain proficiency with a range of concepts and
practices. Some of these routines are well known and commonly implemented.
One example is Calendar Time, a familiar and often-implemented routine de-
scribed in textbooks as well as supplementary resources. Calendar Time allows
students to learn about the months of the year, days of the week, and school-day
activities through using the calendar (Shumway 2011). Teachers may also design
questions, based on the calendar, that allow students to practice grade-specific
skills. Whereas teachers use Calendar Time often, they use other routines less
frequently, and as a result, many opportunities to enhance our students’ under-
standing of and proficiency with mathematics are lost.
Consistent use of routines can yield many benefits for students. Such routines
offer access to the big ideas of mathematics and allow deep understanding of
concepts. In fact, routines can be designed to focus on the desired mathematical
content. Mathematical routines also give students opportunities to develop exper-
tise with the eight mathematical practices described in the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics (National Governors Association Center for Best
Practices [NGA Center] and Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO]
2010; see fig. I.1 and the appendix). The mathematical practices are based on the
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM; 2000) Process Standards
of Problem Solving, Reasoning and Proof, Communication, Representation, and
Connections as well as the strands of mathematical proficiency described in the
National Research Council’s book Adding It Up (Kilpatrick, Swafford, and Find-
ell 2001). Mathematical routines offer opportunities for students to demonstrate
their thinking and for teachers to gain insight into the thinking of their students.
Fig. I.1.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice described in the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics (NGA Center and CCSSO 2010, p. 6)
Each chapter begins with classroom vignettes that provide a glimpse of how
the routine might look as it is implemented in a variety of grade levels. A de-
scription of the routine and implementation strategies follow. We give examples
of student work from various grade levels for each of the routines, examples of
ways to assess student thinking by using the routines, and suggestions for adapt-
ing the routines.
We hope the routines we describe and the student work we share will encour-
age you to try the routines with your own students and to think of creative ways
to implement these and other mathematical routines.
References
Kilpatrick, Jeremy, Jane Swafford, and Bradford Findell, eds. Adding It Up: Helping Children
Learn Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2001.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 2000.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Shumway, Jessica F. Number Sense Routines: Building Numerical Literacy Every Day in Grades
K–3. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers, 2011.
CHAPTER
3
2
CHAPTER
1
APPENDIX
Today’s Number
1st A first-grade class is told that today’s number is 15. The stu-
grade dents think quietly for a bit and then begin to share what
they know about 15.
Alex comments, “I know that 15 is 5 more than 10.”
“The speed limit in front of the school is 15,” adds Max.
Lucy shares, “If you count by 5s, you’ll get to 15.”
Fig. 1.1.
Kindergarten class representations of 7
The Today’s Number routine also allows students to develop the eight math-
ematical practices described in the Common Core State Standards for Math-
ematics (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council
of Chief State School Officers 2010; see appendix A). One practice involves the
construction of viable arguments and the critique of the reasoning of others.
Explaining their thinking is not an easy task for students working at any level.
In fact, many mathematically proficient and gifted students have a great deal of
difficulty explaining how they arrived at an answer. The open-ended nature of
the Today’s Number task allows for responses at multiple levels of thinking and
gives students the opportunity to explain their thinking. Students also have the
opportunity to informally critique the justifications provided by others as they
hear other students explain their own representations. Another mathematical
practice enhanced by the use of Today’s Number is making use of the structure
of mathematics. Many students will provide representations of the number of
the day that are based on the decomposition of the number. As they decompose
a variety of numbers, patterns will emerge. For example, when thinking about
the number 48, a student may first suggest that 48 could be presented as 6 × 8.
Another student may use this fact to suggest thinking about 6 × 8 as 6 × 5 + 6 ×
3. Such representations suggested over time for a variety of numbers will result
in a foundation for learning about the distributive property.
A variety of models may be used across grade levels with Today’s Number,
and the consistent use of these models will provide curricular articulation and
coherence. Bar, part–whole, number bond, and number line models may each
be used at any grade level. Bar, part–whole, and number bond models may be
used to illustrate decomposition, and the number line model used to represent
the comparison of the number of the day to other numbers. Figure 1.2 shows the
use of these models for a variety of Today’s Numbers. Teachers should look for
and capitalize on student use of these models when selecting sample representa-
tions to be shared with the class. If these models are not suggested by students,
the teacher may choose to introduce them as a way to represent Today’s Number.
In the student work we collected, students often used the number line model, but
few used the other models without teacher prompting.
Fig. 1.2.
Use of models with Today’s Number
environment that validates the importance of the thinking of all students and the
importance of communication in mathematics. Shumway (2011) suggests that for
teachers the difficult part of this routine is knowing what to look for in student
work and how to highlight important math concepts as the students share their
representations. She provides a list of common big ideas to look for in student
work, including decomposing the number; using various groupings of ones, tens,
Fig. 1.3c.
A fifth grader represents ¾ by using decomposition.
10
11
References
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Reys, Robert, Mary M. Lindquist, Diana V. Lambdin, and Nancy L. Smith. Helping Children
Learn Mathematics. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Shumway, Jessica F. Number Sense Routines: Building Numerical Literacy Every Day in Grades
K–3. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers, 2011.
12
CHAPTER
4
CHAPTER
3
2
CHAPTER
1Mystery Number
APPENDIX
13
14
also be allowed to select their own Mystery Numbers. Older students may also
be asked to analyze two different sets of clues for a particular mystery number
to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each set. Working in small
groups provides support to students as they use or develop clues. As students
share their clues with others in the class, the teacher has the opportunity to look
for increasing levels of sophistication in how the students are thinking about
numbers. Figure 2.1 provides examples of student work that show various levels
and styles of thinking.
Teacher questioning is an important part of implementing this routine. Ques-
tions that will enhance the reasoning and problem-solving abilities of students
include asking students to determine whether a set of clues leads to only one
number or whether multiple answers are possible, determining whether the clue
set contains extra clues, and considering the sequencing of clues.
15
16
to continue to grow and supports the idea that the development of number sense
is a lifelong process (Reys et al. 2012).
Many of the Standards for Mathematical Practice described in the Common
Core State Standards for Mathematics (National Governors Association Center
for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers 2010; see appendix
A) may be developed through the use of Mystery Number. These eight practices
describe the processes and proficiencies that math teachers at all levels strive to
develop in students. One of the eight practices describes mathematically profi-
cient students as working to communicate precisely with others. The Mystery
Number routine encourages this practice, as students carefully consider the clues
they must give for another student to guess the number. Writing clues that lead
to a single mystery number and sequencing the clues also promote precision
in communication. In addition, as students participate in the Mystery Number
routine, they attend to the meaning of quantities and create coherent representa-
tions of a problem—aspects of reasoning quantitatively. Finally, students must
consider a logical progression of statements to be used as clues, and as the clues
are shared with others, students may be called on to provide support for the clues
they created. As they do so, they get experience constructing viable arguments.
17
18
19
References
Howden, Hilde. “Teaching Number Sense.” Arithmetic Teacher 36 (February 1989): 6–11.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Reys, Robert, Mary M. Lindquist, Diana V. Lambdin, and Nancy L. Smith. Helping Children
Learn Mathematics. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
20
CHAPTER
5
CHAPTER
4
CHAPTER
3
Alike
2 and Different
CHAPTER
1
APPENDIX
21
22
students could be asked to suggest items for all in the class to consider.
The benefit to be gained from this routine will be increased by allowing
students some quiet, individual thinking and recording time before sharing with
others. After this, the teacher may choose to have students share in pairs, in
small groups, or as a class. Allowing students to hear how others thought about
the numbers or shapes being considered and how they are alike and different will
enhance the learning of all. Encouraging students to explain and justify their
choices of how the items are alike and different will provide valuable experience
in using reasoning to construct mathematical arguments. In addition, asking a
student to explain the reasoning of another student emphasizes the importance of
listening in the communication process.
Recording student responses by using a Venn diagram or other graphic orga-
nizer is helpful with this routine. Venn diagrams clearly indicate the similarities
and differences of the two numbers, shapes, and so forth. Figure 3.1 shows Venn
diagrams created by students completing the Alike and Different routine. The
first diagram was used by a fifth grader thinking about 3/4 and 5/8, whereas the
second was used by a seventh grader comparing 5/8 and 61%. (Interestingly, al-
though most of the students had been exposed to Venn diagrams, in the work we
collected, few students used a Venn diagram without teacher prompting.) Posting
class diagrams or having students work in journals or individual notebooks will
provide an ongoing record that allows the teacher to see growth in the sophisti-
cation of the students’ thinking. This strategy will also enable children to look
back at the ways they thought about particular numbers or shapes that they had
considered previously.
Fig. 3.1.
Students use Venn diagrams to show how two numbers are alike
and different.
23
24
and theoretical probability, rotations and reflections, or the commutative and as-
sociative properties. Because of the variety of mathematical content that may be
used with this routine, it is very adaptable to many grade levels and abilities.
As students compare numbers, they will have the opportunity to develop the
eight Standards for Mathematical Practice described in the Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics (National Governors Association Center for Best
Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers 2010; see appendix A). One
of the standards, reason abstractly and quantitatively, includes the ability to cre-
ate coherent representations of a problem, to attend to the meaning of the quanti-
ties involved, and to flexibly use different properties of operations and objects.
As students identify similarities and differences between numbers and objects,
they will gain valuable experience in each of these practices. A second Standard
for Mathematical Practice describes mathematically proficient students as having
the ability to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
The description of this standard states, “Students at all grades can listen or read
the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful ques-
tions to clarify or improve the arguments” (p. 7). As students explain the charac-
teristics they identified as being alike or different and listen to the reasoning of
others, they will be moving toward meeting this standard.
25
Fig. 3.2.
Second-grade student work for the task of describing how 29 and 50
are alike and different
3.2a. The obvious similarity and difference noted by this student would be a
good starting point for class sharing.
3.2b. This student shares an incorrect likeness between the numbers. However,
the differences noted are more specific than those in the above example.
26
Fig. 3.3.
Fifth-grade student work for the task of describing how 3 /4 and 5 /8
are alike and different.
3.3b. A more detailed response is given by this student, who drew a pic-
ture to support the statement that the two fractions are not equivalent.
3.3c. This student identified only similarities but did notice several ways
that the fractions were alike.
27
References
Marzano, Robert J., Debra J. Pickering, and Jane E. Pollock. Classroom Instruction That Works:
Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Alexandria, Va.: As-
sociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2001.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, Va.: NCTM, 2000.
28
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Silver, Harvey F. Compare and Contrast: Teaching Comparative Thinking to Strengthen Student
Learning. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development,
2010.
29
CHAPTER
6
CHAPTER
5
CHAPTER
4
Number
3 Lines
CHAPTER
2
CHAPTER
1
1st
grade
First graders Kristen and Jagan are working together to
APPENDIX locate 13 on a number line with only 10 and 20 marked.
10 20
400 800
31
32
large number line on a wall will allow students to more precisely locate values
since smaller partitions may be used. Students may also be asked to establish two
points on a number line, mark a location between those two points, and exchange
number lines with another group. The group will then work together to deter-
mine the value of the marked location.
The Number Line routine may also be used with computation. For example,
a student may be asked to use an empty number line to solve 42 − 29. An empty
number line (a number line with no numbers or markers) is a tool that may enhance
students’ mental math skills and proficiency with operations. When using an empty
number line, students mark only the numbers that are needed for their calculations
(Bobis 2007). In so doing, their thinking strategies are revealed. Figure 4.1 shows
three different methods of solving 42 − 29 by using empty number lines.
Fig. 4.1.
Three different student methods of solving 42 − 29 by using an
empty number line
Bobis (2007) describes the link between an empty number line and the intui-
tive mental strategies children use as an advantage. She suggests that students
will first focus on counting strategies and then, as they become more proficient,
move to using combinations of counting strategies and partitioning strategies.
The empty number line can also encourage the use of more sophisticated strate-
gies as students record their computational strategies on the number line and
share their thinking with others. This process also allows the teacher to see mis-
conceptions and adjust instruction accordingly (Bobis 2007).
33
As with many mathematical routines, students will benefit from being al-
lowed some individual time to think and record their thinking before sharing with
others. Having students share the thinking process they used to determine the
location of a value or the value of an indicated location will help develop the num-
ber sense of all students in the class. Also, in sharing their thinking with others,
students will get practice in communicating mathematically.
Fig. 4.2.
Examples of second-grade work locating 13 on a number line
4.2a. This student marked and then erased tick marks to help with
locating 13. The student then counted to locate 13 fairly accurately.
34
4.2b. This second grader considered how 13 compared to 10 but did not
appear to have considered 20 in locating 13 accurately.
4.2c. This second grader did not partition the length but did use the
relative magnitudes of 10, 13, and 20 in locating 13 on the number line.
As students move into upper elementary grades, the number line continues
to be a valuable tool for number sense development. Varied levels of understand-
ing and explanation are commonly seen in the work of students. Figure 4.3 shows
the work of some fourth-grade students asked to determine the value marked by
an arrow placed on a number line with 400 and 800 marked.
35
Fig. 4.3.
Four examples of fourth-grade work determining the value of a
location marked on the number line
4.3a. This student marked and then erased tick marks to help with locating
13. The student then counted to locate 13 fairly accurately.
4.3b. Interestingly, this student did not consider the 800 in determining
the value of the arrow. Another interesting aspect of the work is that
although the student made two tick marks after 400, he labeled the
second 500.
4.3c. The fourth-grade student’s process results in a correct answer, but her
explanation does not fully explain how she thought about the number line.
36
4.3d. This fourth grader correctly gave a value for the arrow as well as a
complete explanation of the thinking that supports the answer.
Bay (2001) suggests many uses for the number line in the upper grades. For
example, the relative size of very large numbers can be explored using number
lines. Students may be asked to locate 4,096 on a number line with 0 and 10,000
marked. Then the upper point is changed to 100,000 or 1,000,000, causing stu-
dents to relocate 4,096.
Rounding numbers is difficult for many students, and the use of a number
line may provide the visual representation needed to overcome this difficulty.
The Number Line routine can be adapted to include problems asking students to
use the number line to round. For example, suppose students are asked to round
578 to the nearest hundred. Marking 500 and 600 on the number line since 578
is between them, marking the halfway point of 550, and then marking 578 on the
number line will help students realize that 578 is nearer 600 and thus rounds to
600 (see fig. 4.4).
Fig. 4.4.
Use of a number line to assist in rounding
37
Fig. 4.5.
Fifth-grade students locate 3 /5 on a number line and explain
their thinking.
38
4.5c. This student understands that fractions and decimals are related but
fails to see that an error in computation produces an unreasonable answer.
The use of the Number Line routine with rational numbers helps overcome
the difficulty students face in using the number line model. Teachers will want to
consider marking the number line with negatives and with numbers greater than
1 to allow for the development and discussion of misconceptions regarding the
location of rational numbers on the number line.
An interesting use of the number line to develop algebraic reasoning is sug-
gested by Bay (2001). She suggests the use of the number line to explore algebra-
ic expressions. The number 0 is placed on the number line and then the variable x
is placed arbitrarily on the line, allowing the students to know whether x repre-
sents a positive or negative value. Students are asked to determine the location of
expressions such as 3x, x2 , x + 2, and x – 5. After placing the expressions on the
number line, the students are asked to consider whether the placement is possible
and whether the location marked is the only place the value could be located.
As students locate values on the number line and find the value of specified
locations, they can use and develop many of the eight Standards for Mathemati-
cal Practice described in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
(see appendix A). By using the Number Line routine, students come to see the
number line as a useful tool and can use it strategically and appropriately to solve
problems. Using the number line assists them in reasoning quantitatively and
requires them to use precision with the number line as well as in communicating
39
their thinking about the number line. Finally, as students explain their thinking
to others, they are gaining experience in constructing viable arguments while
learning to listen and critique the reasoning of others.
Fig. 4.6.
Student work illustrating some misconceptions students hold
4.6b. This fourth grader fails to consider the magnitude of the marked 800 in
describing “halfway.”
40
41
for students who are successfully counting by tens from any starting value. They
may also look for students who are successfully bridging tens in their work. To
solve 9 + 4, the student partitions 4 into 1 + 3. The student adds in part:
(9 + 1) + 3 = 13 (Bobis 2007).
Fig. 4.7.
The student understands the relative magnitude of the numbers
but cannot accurately represent this on the number line.
42
the routine, it may be used with students at any grade level. The number line is
an important mathematical tool, and the use of this routine provides valuable
experience in the use of the tool. Also, the frequent use of the number line in the
elementary grades will help ease the transition to thinking about fractions on the
number line. The routine encourages students to present viable mathematical ar-
guments, attend to precision in mathematical communication, and become more
proficient with quantitative reasoning.
References
Bay, Jennifer. “Developing Number Sense on the Number Line.” Mathematics Teaching in the
Middle School 6 (April 2001): 448–51.
Bobis, Janette. “The Empty Number Line: A Useful Tool or Just Another Procedure?” Teaching
Children Mathematics 13 (April 2007): 410–13.
Frykholm, Jeffrey. Learning to Think Mathematically with the Number Line, K–5. Boulder, Colo.:
Cloudbreak Publishing, 2010.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Reys, Robert E., Mary M. Lindquist, Diana V. Lambdin, and Nancy L. Smith. Helping Children
Learn Mathematics. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley and Sons, 2012.
Van de Walle, John A., Karen S. Karp, and Jennifer M. Bay-Williams. Elementary and Middle
School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. Boston: Pearson, 2010.
43
CHAPTER
7
CHAPTER
6
CHAPTER
5
Quick4
Images
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
3
1st
grade
CHAPTER
2
1
APPENDIX A first-grade teacher shows this dot arrangement to her
students for a few seconds. The students are then asked to
tell how many dots they saw and how they knew.
Ashley says, “There are four dots on the top row and three
dots on the bottom row. Four and three more is seven.” “I
saw two dots going up and down. There’s three of those
and then one extra,” adds Derrick. Bradley comments, “I
kind of thought that, too, but I see six and then one stick-
ing out.”
3rd
grade
Kayla notices there are four sets of four dots and con-
cludes there are 16 dots in all since 4 × 4 = 16.
45
6th
grade
Implementing
the Routine When implementing the Quick Im-
ages routine, the teacher projects or holds up
an image. The image may be an arrangement
of dots, ten-frames, geometric figures, and so
forth. After seeing the image for a very brief period, students are asked to tell
the quantity shown or to draw or build a copy of what they saw. In addition, they
are asked to explain how they saw the image. The teacher may choose to show
the image for a second time to allow students an opportunity to revise and refine
their mental image.
The ability to instantly see how many are in a small group is an example
of the use of subitizing (Reys et al. 2012). Reys and colleagues provide several
46
reasons why the ability to subitize is important. First, recognizing the quantity
in a small group saves time because it is faster than counting each member in the
group. Second, subitizing is a forerunner of powerful ideas related to number.
For example, children who subitize demonstrate the knowledge of order rela-
tionships (4 is more than 2, and 4 is one less than 5). A third important aspect
of subitizing is that it helps children develop more sophisticated counting tech-
niques such as counting on. Finally, the ability to subitize assists with developing
proficiency with addition and subtraction since students will not have to count
but can instead focus on the action of the operation (Reys et al. 2012). Clements
and Sarama (2009) state that subitizing starts developing very early and, when
developed well, provides a foundation for mathematics through elementary,
middle school, high school, and beyond.
Clements (1999) describes two types of subitizing. First, perceptual subi-
tizing is the ability to perceive a quantity intuitively. This type of subitizing is
demonstrated with small numbers. The second type of subitizing, conceptual
subitizing, is the ability to see parts and put them together to create the whole.
The explanations shown in the student work in figure 5.1 are examples of con-
ceptual subitizing.
47
48
49
Fig. 5.2.
Arrangement of base-ten blocks not grouped by place
values
Quick Images can also be used to enhance the spatial skills of students.
Students can be shown arrangements of geometric shapes for a short time and
then be asked to draw what they saw. Having students write explanations about
how they saw the arrangement provides a great deal of information about how
students are thinking about geometric figures. As a variation, students could be
asked to provide a set of directions verbally to another student so that the second
student can re-create the drawing.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (National Governors
Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Of-
ficers 2010) describes eight mathematical practices that educators should strive
to develop in all students (see the complete text of all the practices in appendix
A). The Quick Images routine allows students the opportunity to use structure,
one of the practices, as they think about and describe how they saw a Quick Im-
age. An example of the use of structure is found in the explanation provided by
a student who sees the image shown in figure 5.3 and states that there are seven
dots because there are three groups of two and one more. A pair of students may
realize that although one of them sees four dots and three more while the other
one sees three dots and four more, they will both see seven dots all together. This
visual example of the commutative property is another example of the use of
structure.
50
Fig. 5.3.
Dot arrangement shown to students
Fig. 5.4.
Geometric arrangement shown to students
51
working with quantities. When arrangements of geometric drawings are used for
Quick Images, the vocabulary used provides information regarding the students’
understanding of geometric concepts. The examples shown in figure 5.6 show the
variety of ways students saw the geometric arrangement shown in figure 5.5.
Fig. 5.5.
Geometric arrangement shown to
students
52
Shumway (2011) provides an extensive list of questions that teachers may use
to assess students’ thinking. These questions include the following:
• How many did you see?
• How did you know it so quickly?
• Did you need to count?
• Did you count each dot, or did you just see the amount?
• How did you combine the dots to know how many? (p. 22)
Fig. 5.7.
Example of image to be used with
upper grade levels
53
and flexibility with addition and subtraction are two important areas of math-
ematics enhanced with the use of Quick Images. In addition, the routine provides
valuable experience in attending to precision, modeling with mathematics, and
using the structure of mathematics.
References
Clements, Douglas. H. “Subitizing: What Is It? Why Teach It?” Teaching Children Mathematics 5
(March 1999): 400–05.
Clements, Douglas H., and Julie Sarama. Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Tra-
jectories Approach. New York: Routledge, 2009.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Reys, Robert E., Mary M. Lindquist, Diana V. Lambdin, and Nancy L. Smith. Helping Children
Learn Mathematics. 10th ed. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley and Sons, 2012.
Shumway, Jessica F. Number Sense Routines: Building Numerical Literacy Every Day in Grades
K–3. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers, 2011.
54
CHAPTER
8
CHAPTER
7
CHAPTER
6
Guess My
5 Rule
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
4
2nd
grade
CHAPTER
3
A second-grade teacher shows her students a function
machine with the rule “Subtract 6” written on it. She asks
2
the students to create a list of “in” numbers and “out”
numbers.
CHAPTER
1
IN IN
IN OUT
Rule: 2 6
APPENDIX Subtract 6 OUT OUT
4 12
7 21
3rd Third graders Joe and Andi are working together to find
grade the rule being used to create the “in” and “out” numbers
shown in the table below.
IN IN
IN OUT
Rule: 2 6
Subtract 6 OUT OUT
4 12
7 21
55
56
machine could also be created and laminated so that a variety of Guess My Rule
games could be played.
Students may be provided the rule and then asked to determine the output
generated for a given input. In addition, they may also be given a set of inputs
and outputs and asked to determine the rule that describes the relationship
between these. Older students can be asked to create their own rules for Guess
My Rule. Each of these methods of implementation provides students valuable
experience with algebraic thinking.
Recording the work of students provides ongoing assessment for teachers.
Students may record Guess My Rule problems in individual journals so that they
may look back at previously worked problems for guidance on new ones. Whole-
group work on Guess My Rule could be recorded on large charts and displayed
for quick reference by students. Asking students to explain their solution strate-
gies and thinking in written form is also a valuable practice.
Regardless of how the routine is implemented, an important part of the rou-
tine is allowing time for students to verbally describe how they thought about the
relationship among the quantities to solve the task presented. Students could be
asked to work on the problem individually, work with a partner, or participate in
a whole-class discussion about Guess My Rule. The time spent having students
explain their thinking and approaches to a problem will result in the enhanced
algebraic thinking of students and an improved ability to make mathematical
arguments.
57
58
pairs created. A fourth-grade student (see fig. 6.2) looked only at an input of 2
resulting in an output of 6 to suggest that the rule was “count by 4.” The student
did not pay attention to the other pairs in the table.
Fig. 6.1.
A second-grade student incorrectly applies the rule “Add 2.”
Fig. 6.2.
A fourth grader uses only the first pair of values to
write a rule.
59
An interesting trend we noticed was that many students looked for a pattern
in the numbers that were chosen as input values. For example, the two students
whose work is shown in figures 6.3 and 6.4 each increased the number in the
input column by one more than the increase in the previous pair. The student
whose work is shown in figure 6.3 even indicates this pattern in what he recorded
on the function machine. The work in figure 6.4 shows that this student also tried
to find an additive pattern in the output numbers. An error in computation led
the student to generate incorrect output values even though the correct rule was
noted.
Fig. 6.3.
A fourth grader writes a rule for the function
machine.
Fig. 6.4.
Another fourth grader works on the function
machine problem.
60
Finally, many of the students simply recorded the rule on the function ma-
chine. However, some students chose to express the rule in writing (fig. 6.5). A
few students were able to record the rule in a symbolic manner (fig. 6.6).
Fig. 6.5.
A fourth-grade student expresses the rule in
writing.
Fig. 6.6.
A fourth-grade student expresses
the rule symbolically.
61
form and requiring outputs in another. For example, inputs could be in fraction
form, and as part of the rule, outputs must be expressed as decimals. Varying
the information provided to the students will also alter the demand of the task.
Students can be given the input and rule and asked to find the output, they may
be provided the rule and output and asked to find the input, or they may be pro-
vided the input and output and asked to find the rule. With very young children,
sorting rules can be used with the Guess My Rule routine. Attribute blocks or
other materials can be placed in Venn diagrams according to a secret rule. When
the child believes he knows the rule, he can check his rule by placing a block in
the diagram. After the teacher indicates whether the placement is correct, other
students may take turns placing blocks to check the rules they notice.
References
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Reeves, Charles A. “Putting Fun into Functions.” Teaching Children Mathematics 12 (January
2006): 250–59.
Soares, June, Maria L. Blanton, and James J. Kaput. “Thinking Algebraically across the Elemen-
tary School Curriculum.” Teaching Children Mathematics 12 (January 2006): 228–35.
Van de Walle, John A., and LouAnn H. Lovin. Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics, Grades
5–8. Boston: Pearson Education, 2006.
62
CHAPTER
9
CHAPTER
8
CHAPTER
7
How Do You
6 Know?
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
5
2nd
grade 4
A second-grade teacher poses the following question to
CHAPTER her students:
3
“How do you know that 12 is an even number?”
The students think quietly for a minute. Then each
CHAPTER
turns knee to knee with another student and begins
2
CHAPTER
talking.
Michelle tells her partner, Clinton, “It ends with a 2,
1
APPENDIX
so it’s an even number because 2 is an even number.”
Clinton replies, “I know it’s even because if you count
by 2s you say 12 and you say all even numbers when
you count by 2.”
63
64
given only orally since writing explanations will probably be difficult for many
students. Older students may be asked to give either oral or written explanations,
and they may be asked to provide an explanation for a specific audience. For ex-
ample, students could be asked to explain in written form to a first-grade student
how they know that a figure is a rectangle. In addition, different tasks could be
offered to students in the class to make it possible for all students to participate
in the How Do You Know? routine.
Mathematical Explanation
Has a clear purpose.
• Makes clear at the outset what is being explained and why you start there;
and carefully connects the explanation to the question or idea being
explained.
• States what is known and what needs to be determined.
Fig. 7.1.
Mathematical explanation (Ball 2012)
An important part of the routine is the time spent sharing explanations. This
time will allow the teacher to help the students understand the components of an
explanation and will enable him or her to provide support as the students prac-
tice incorporating these components. Sharing may be done first in pairs or small
65
66
sion is also supported by the How Do You Know? routine. Although precision
in computation is part of this practice, precision also refers to precision in verbal
and written communication of mathematics. As students create and present their
explanations for How Do You Know?, they will have the opportunity to develop
precision in mathematical communication.
Fig. 7.2.
Figure shown to students
67
Fig. 7.3.
First three levels of van Hiele model (adapted from Bassarear 2012,
p. 485)
Fig. 7.4a.
This student appears to be working at the first van Hiele level since no
attributes are mentioned.
68
Fig. 7.4b.
This student appears to be working at the second van Hiele level since
many attributes are listed. However, some of the attributes are not
needed for identification of rectangles.
Fig. 7.4c.
This student may be beginning to work at the third van Hiele level since
not all attributes are listed, and no mention is made of the different
side lengths.
Fig. 7.5a.
Seventh-grade students provide explanations for how they know that
0.4 × 0.33 = 0.04 × 3.3. Each explanation offers valuable insight into
student understandings and misunderstandings.
69
70
References
Ball, Deborah L. “Practicing the Common Core: What is the Work of Teaching?” Presentation
at National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pa.,
April 2012.
Bassarear, Tom. Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers. 5th ed. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/
Cole, Cengage, 2012.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Van de Walle, John A., and LouAnn H. Lovin. Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics, Grades
5–8. Boston: Pearson Education, 2006.
71
CHAPTER
9
CHAPTER
8
7
Infusing Mathematics into
Nonmathematical Routines
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
6
2nd
CHAPTER
5
It’s time for recess for a second-grade class. Brian checks
4
grade the Classroom Jobs chart and notices that it’s his day to
take a basketball outside. Zach, the line leader, takes his
CHAPTER place by the classroom door. Their teacher looks around
CHAPTER
3
the room and notices that the students in one row have
put away all their belongings. She asks them to line up
and then looks for another row that’s ready. When all the
2
CHAPTER
students are in line, she gives Zach a signal, and he leads
the class from the room. He stops when he gets to the
door leading to the playground and waits for his teacher.
1
APPENDIX
When the teacher reaches the front of the line, she waits
until all students are quiet and then dismisses the class to
go outside for recess.
73
74
75
76
Reference
Shumway, Jessica F. Number Sense Routines: Building Numerical Literacy Every Day in Grades
K–3. Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers, 2011.
77
CHAPTER
9
8 Routines
High Yield from
CHAPTER
CHAPTER
7
3rd
CHAPTER
6
1st– A group of first-, second-, and third-grade teachers are
meeting after school. All the teachers have collected work
grade
5
their students have done for the Mystery Number routine.
The teachers exchange work across grade levels and con-
CHAPTER tinue exchanging until each has had the chance to see the
4
work from all other teachers.
CHAPTER The teachers notice some similarities across all grade levels.
CHAPTER
3
Some students at each grade level struggle with writing a
sequence of clues that allows their classmates to find the
Mystery Number without providing unnecessary clues.
2
CHAPTER
Other students at each grade level limit their clues to those
dealing with magnitude. There are also many noticeable
differences. The work of the third-grade students in gen-
1
APPENDIX
eral displays more sophistication in the clue sequence and
more consistent use of correct vocabulary.
79
80
Resources
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and Council of Chief
State School Officers (CCSSO). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Common Core State Standards (College- and Career-Readiness Standards and K–12
Standards in English Language Arts and Math). Washington, D.C.: NGA Center and
CCSSO, 2010. http://www.corestandards.org/.
Sztajn, Paola, Karen Marrongelle, Peg Smith, and Bonnie Melton. Supporting Implementation of
the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Recommendations for Professional
Development (summary report). The William and Ida Friday Institute for Educational
Innovation at the North Carolina State University College of Education, March 2011.
http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Math_Standards/Summary_PD_CCSSMath.pdf.
81
CHAPTER
2
1
APPENDIX
83
Mathematically proficient students can apply the mathematics they know to solve
problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace. In early grades,
this might be as simple as writing an addition equation to describe a situation.
In middle grades, a student might apply proportional reasoning to plan a school
event or analyze a problem in the community. By high school, a student might
use geometry to solve a design problem or use a function to describe how one
quantity of interest depends on another. Mathematically proficient students who
84
can apply what they know are comfortable making assumptions and approxima-
tions to simplify a complicated situation, realizing that these may need revision
later. They are able to identify important quantities in a practical situation and
map their relationships using such tools as diagrams, two-way tables, graphs,
flowcharts and formulas. They can analyze those relationships mathematically
to draw conclusions. They routinely interpret their mathematical results in the
context of the situation and reflect on whether the results make sense, possibly
improving the model if it has not served its purpose.
85
with a degree of precision appropriate for the problem context. In the elemen-
tary grades, students give carefully formulated explanations to each other. By
the time they reach high school they have learned to examine claims and make
explicit use of definitions.
86
High-Yield Routines is a book that should be owned by all elementary and middle school
mathematics teachers. It shows a quick and easy way to optimize precious classroom minutes,
infusing mathematics into otherwise non-mathematical routines. The connections to the Common
Core practice standards will help teachers address this important content throughout the day in ways
that are unexpected but highly productive.
Rita Barger • University of Missouri-Kansas City
High-Yield Routines describes several mathematical routines that will create opportunities for
differentiated instruction to take place naturally with students. The routines described in the
book allow each student to participate at his or her own level and to build upon existing knowledge
to develop a deeper understanding of the content. The routines are easy to implement and
classroom teachers at all grade levels will be able to utilize the routines to enhance the mathematics
understanding of students.
Jami Smith • Archie Middle School
Joann Barnett is retired from the Ozark, MO, school district where she taught elementary and
middle school mathematics for nearly thirty years. She is now an adjunct instructor for mathematics
and mathematics education at Missouri State University and Ozarks Technical Community College.
Over the past thirteen years, she has been involved with various state and federal grants to provide
professional development for teachers.
Missouri State University and Ozarks Technical Community College, Springfield, MO
Emily Combs is in her fourteenth year as a middle school mathematics teacher at Clinton
Middle School, Clinton, MO. Over the past ten years she has participated in many professional
development projects including her role as co-principal investigator of a Mathematics and Science
Partnership Grant. She is interested in using learning trajectories to build accessible, mathematically
rich lessons to deepen mathematics understanding smoothly across grade levels.
Clinton Middle School, Clinton, MO