Canadian Housing Statistics Program

Released at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time in The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

The housing market in Canada is going under the microscope

Statistics Canada has undertaken a joint project with the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation to develop a
framework designed to address data gaps related to housing.

This marks the first release from the Canadian Housing Statistics Program (CHSP), the framework that provides a
coherent and consistent structure to measure the ownership of Canadian residential real estate. This information
will also demonstrate how Canada's housing stock changes over time. (See note to readers)

Non-resident ownership varies by different type of property

Data from the CHSP revealed that non-residents owned 3.4% of all residential properties in the Toronto census
metropolitan area (CMA), while the value of these properties accounted for 3.0% of the total residential property
value in that metropolitan area. In the Vancouver CMA, non-residents owned 4.8% of residential properties,
accounting for 5.1% of total residential property value.

Estimates of non-resident ownership varied by property type. In both metropolitan areas, non-resident ownership
was more prevalent for condominium-apartments. Non-residents owned 7.2% of condominium-apartments in the
Toronto CMA and 7.9% of these units in the Vancouver CMA. By comparison, non-residents owned 2.1% of
single-detached houses in the Toronto CMA, and 3.2% of single-detached houses in the Vancouver CMA.

Infographic 1 –  Examples of residency status and citizenship for individuals

For a more detailed report on the residential property holdings in both CMAs, see the article "Non-resident
Ownership of Residential Properties in Toronto and Vancouver: Initial Information from the Canadian Housing
Statistics Program" from the publication Economic Insights (11-626-X). This release is also accompanied by two
infographics, one for the Vancouver CMA and one for the Toronto CMA.

Over the past decade, home prices have accelerated markedly in Canada's largest urban areas, particularly in
Vancouver and Toronto. Data from the Canadian Real Estate Association Home Price Index show prices
increased 173.7% in Vancouver from January 2005 to November 2017, while they rose 145.0% in Toronto over the
same period. The last three years have been particularly telling, with house prices in Vancouver increasing by more
than 60% and in Toronto by more than 40%.

Housing affordability is an important issue for Canadians, prompting governments to obtain better data to inform
policy.
 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Levels of non-resident ownership vary widely among municipalities

Non-residents of Canada owned 4.8% of the residential properties in the Vancouver CMA and 3.4% in the Toronto
CMA. Breaking down the CMAs by municipalities, across the Vancouver CMA, non-resident ownership was most
concentrated in the City of Vancouver (7.6%), followed by Richmond (7.5%) and West Vancouver (6.2%) (Table 1).
In the Toronto CMA, the shares of non-resident owned properties were largest in the municipalities of Toronto
(4.9%), followed by Richmond Hill (3.6%) and Markham (3.3%) (Table 2).

Table 1
Number of residential properties and proportion owned by non-residents by census subdivisions
in the Vancouver census metropolitan area (CMA)
  Number of residential properties Non-resident ownership rate (%)
Vancouver CMA 765,343 4.8
Vancouver – City 187,961 7.6
Richmond 70,503 7.5
West Vancouver 16,334 6.2
Lions Bay 590 5.6
Burnaby 72,298 5.0
Belcarra 346 4.9
Coquitlam 44,974 4.7
Bowen Island 2,217 4.2
Anmore 789 4.2
Greater Vancouver A 1 5,286 4.1
White Rock 8,363 4.1
North Vancouver – City 17,391 3.8
Port Moody 11,842 3.3
New Westminster 22,665 3.3
Surrey 141,615 2.9
Port Coquitlam 19,432 2.5
North Vancouver – District municipality 30,861 2.4
Langley – City 9,337 2.3
Langley – District municipality 36,672 2.2
Maple Ridge 28,279 2.1
Delta 31,296 2.0
Pitt Meadows 6,292 1.9
1. Greater Vancouver A is a unique part of the Vancouver CMA that ranges from urban, suburban, seasonal use, to rural and remote areas. The majority of the
population is located at the University of British Columbia and the University Endowment Lands. For more information see
http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/electoral-area-a/pages/default.aspx.
Source(s): CANSIM table 035-0001.

2 Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Table 2
Number of residential properties and proportion owned by non-residents by census subdivisions
in the Toronto census metropolitan area (CMA)
  Number of residential properties Non-resident ownership rate (%)
Toronto CMA 1,720,585 3.4
Toronto – City 753,750 4.9
Richmond Hill 61,653 3.6
Markham 101,134 3.3
Georgina 18,627 2.9
Mississauga 202,053 2.7
Oakville 62,935 2.6
Aurora 18,810 2.2
Mono 3,483 2.1
King 9,323 1.9
Newmarket 26,224 1.8
Vaughan 95,676 1.8
East Gwillimbury 9,648 1.8
Uxbridge 7,708 1.8
Whitchurch–Stouffville 15,367 1.6
Caledon 22,816 1.5
Milton 34,376 1.5
Bradford West Gwillimbury 12,440 1.4
Brampton 155,225 1.4
New Tecumseth 14,262 1.3
Ajax 35,482 1.3
Pickering 30,184 1.3
Halton Hills 20,042 1.1
Orangeville 9,367 1.1
Source(s): CANSIM table 035-0001.

The largest share of non-resident owned properties are condominium-apartments

The largest share of non-resident ownership in both CMAs was for condominium apartments, at 7.9% in the
Vancouver CMA and 7.2% in the Toronto CMA (Chart 1).

Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X 3

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Chart 1
Share of non-resident owned properties by select property types
 

Single-detached house

Semi-detached house

Row house

Condominium apartment

All

0 2 4 6 8 10
%

Vancouver CMA Toronto CMA

Source(s): CANSIM tables 035-0001.

In the Vancouver CMA, almost two-thirds of non-resident owned properties were condominiums, while in the
Toronto CMA, this share was close to half (Chart 2). Over 80% of these condominiums were apartments in the
Vancouver CMA, whereas in the Toronto CMA, this share was higher at nearly 90%. It should be noted that
although the majority of condominiums were apartments, some were also single-detached houses, semi-detached
houses and row houses.

Across the Vancouver CMA, 50.1% of condominium-apartments owned by non-residents were in the City of
Vancouver, while 14.9% were in Richmond. In the Toronto CMA, non-resident owned condominium-apartments
were primarily located in the City of Toronto (82.8%) and Mississauga (8.6%).

4 Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Chart 2
Non-resident owned properties
 

Vancouver CMA

Toronto CMA

0 20 40 60 80 100
%

Condominium apartment Other condominium types

Not condominium
Source(s): CANSIM tables 035-0001 and 035-0002.

Condominium-apartments owned by non-residents are, on average, higher valued than

those owned by residents
In the Vancouver CMA, the average value of a condominium-apartment owned by non-residents was 30.4% higher
than that of a resident owned condominium-apartment (Chart 3). The City of Vancouver had the highest rate of
non-resident ownership of condominium-apartments within the CMA. The average value of these apartments was
approximately $930,600, which was 25.6% higher than resident-owned.

In the Toronto CMA, non-resident owned condominium-apartments were on average 8.7% more expensive than
resident owned. The City of Toronto had the highest concentration of non-resident owned condominium-apartments
in the CMA, which were on average valued at $439,000, or 7.6% more expensive than resident-owned.

Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X 5

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Chart 3
Average values of condominium-apartments
 

Vancouver CMA

Toronto CMA

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000

dollars

Resident owned Non-resident owned

Source(s): CANSIM table 035-0002.

Properties with a single residential unit owned by non-residents are, on average, higher
valued than those owned by residents
A property with one residential unit refers to a property containing only one set of living quarters, such as a
single-detached house, semi-detached house, row house or condominium-apartment.

Across the Vancouver CMA, the average value of each of these property types was higher for non-resident owned
properties than resident owned, with the disparity greatest for single-detached houses. The average value of a
single-detached house owned by non-residents was approximately $2.3 million compared with $1.6 million for
resident owned (Chart 4).

These differences were most pronounced in the Greater Vancouver A subdivision, the City of Vancouver and West
Vancouver. In Greater Vancouver A, single-detached houses owned by non-residents had an average value of
nearly $8 million, while those owned by residents had an average value of $5.3 million. The average size of a
single-detached house owned by non-residents in this district was close to 4,800 square feet, 32.2% larger than the
average size of single-detached houses owned by residents.

6 Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Chart 4
Average values of select property types in the Vancouver CMA
 

Single-detached house

Semi-detached house

Row house

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000

dollars

Resident owned Non-resident owned

Source(s): CANSIM table 035-0001.

In the Toronto CMA, the average value of properties with one residential unit was also higher for those owned by
non-residents versus resident owned, with the divergence greatest for single-detached houses (Chart 5).

Single-detached houses owned by non-residents were on average 12.3% or $103,500 more expensive than houses
owned by residents. Differences in average values for single-detached houses were most marked in the
municipalities of Markham, Richmond Hill and Toronto. In Markham, the average value of single-detached houses
owned by non-residents was close to $1.1 million compared with $997,500 for resident owners. In Richmond Hill,
non-resident owned single-detached houses were, on average, valued at $1.2 million compared with $1.1 million for
resident owned houses. In the City of Toronto, a non-resident owned single-detached house was, on average,
valued at just over $1 million compared with $965,800 for a resident owned house.

Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X 7

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Chart 5
Average values of select property types in the Toronto CMA
 

Single-detached house

Semi-detached house

Row house

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000

dollars

Resident owned Non-resident owned

Source(s): CANSIM table 035-0001.

8 Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Statistics Canada and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation work together to
address data gaps on estimates of non-resident ownership in residential real estate
Statistics Canada and the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) are working together to
improve housing-related data in Canada. One example of this partnership is the Canadian Housing Statistics
Program (CHSP), which provides a coherent and consistent structure to measure the ownership, property and
financing characteristics of the residential real estate sector in Canada.

In order to address the data gap on the share of non-resident ownership in Canadian residential real estate,
CMHC began collecting information in 2014 on the non-resident share of ownership in condominiums via its
Condominium Apartment Survey. As a result, CMHC has produced estimates for selected major centres
since 2014, including the census metropolitan areas (CMAs) of Toronto and Vancouver.

In Budget 2017, the Government of Canada provided funding to Statistics Canada to improve housing data
through the CHSP. These efforts have resulted in Statistics Canada publishing its first estimates from the
CHSP focusing on non-resident ownership for Vancouver and Toronto.

Statistics Canada and CMHC both define a non-resident homeowner (often expressed as a "foreign
homeowner") as an individual whose principal residence is outside of Canada. "Foreign ownership," in this
case, technically refers to the non-Canadian residency of the legal owner of the property, irrespective of the
owner's citizenship. It should be noted that this definition would classify Canadian citizens whose primary
residence is outside of Canada as a "non-resident."

The key methodological differences between Statistics Canada and the CMHC approaches for measuring
non-resident ownership of condominium-apartments are as follows. Statistics Canada uses various
administrative data sources to identify residency such as land titles, property assessment data, census of
population, tax and Business Register data. CMHC obtains information on non-resident ownership through
telephone interviews of the property management company or condominium (strata) board, or building
superintendent, which may be supplemented by site visits if no telephone contact is made.

Statistics Canada includes individuals and corporations in its estimate of non-resident owners. CMHC only
focuses on individuals. CMHC's estimates of non-resident ownership cover only apartment-condominiums,
while Statistics Canada covers apartment-condominiums and various other housing types, including
non-apartment condominiums, single-detached homes, semi-detached homes, row houses and vacant land.

Statistics Canada's approach is comprehensive in gathering data on non-resident ownership in Canadian

housing markets. In the future, Statistics Canada will continue to extend its coverage to other centres in
consultation and collaboration with CMHC and others, eventually replacing CMHC's collection of non-resident
ownership data.

In the interim, there are differences in the estimates for the share of non-resident condominium-apartment
ownership in Toronto and Vancouver in 2017 between Statistics Canada and CMHC. The explanation of the
differences, as shown above, lies in the different data sources and methodology used by Statistics Canada and
CMHC. As a result, point-estimates for the 2017 share of non-resident ownership of condominium-apartments
in the CMAs of Toronto and Vancouver (and their sub-areas) should be taken from Statistics Canada's results,
reflecting Statistics Canada's more comprehensive methodology. However, CMHC's time series of estimates
for Toronto and Vancouver should be relied upon for insight into the general trends in non-resident ownership
since 2014 and for comparison between cities.

The results of the CMHC study are available in the Housing Observer Online.

Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X 9

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Note to readers
In an effort to rein in housing prices and work toward greater affordability, the government of British Columbia passed legislation that
required foreign purchasers to pay a 15% tax on properties in Metro Vancouver in August 2016. Similarly, the government of Ontario
passed the Fair Housing Plan in June 2017, which included a 15% non-resident speculation tax imposed on foreign buyers of property in
the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

This is the first publication under The Canadian Housing Statistics Program (CHSP) and includes data on 22 municipalities in the
Vancouver census metropolitan area (CMA) and 23 municipalities in the Toronto CMA. The CHSP's residential property database is a
comprehensive repository of statistics intended to address data gaps in the Canadian housing market and to support decision makers in
designing evidence-based policies.

CHSP data are based entirely on administrative files which are combined from multiple sources such as property assessment rolls, land
titles, tax data, census data and other data files. Steps were taken to consolidate and standardize variables originating from the various
data sources. Data abnormalities were resolved in collaboration with data providers and also by comparing with other existing data
sources. CHSP data underwent various levels of quality assurance from internal checks during data production to sampling for detection
of linkage errors. Final results were subjected to manual review to estimate error rates. A follow-up survey is being planned to corroborate
residency status and other characteristics of property owners.

The data published today provides detailed information on the structure of the residential property market as of May 2017 for Toronto
CMA and as of June 2017 for Vancouver CMA. This includes information at the municipal level on the residency status of homeowners,
type of residential property, period of construction, living area and other indicators. Subsequent publications will expand in terms of
geographical coverage and variables contained. The final database, which is expected to be fully populated by December 2022, will
include information on all municipalities in Canada and provide time series data to monitor the evolution of the housing market in different
CMAs over time.

Definitions

Residential property consists of all land and structures intended for private occupancy, whether on a permanent or a temporary basis.
Vacant land on which residential structures can be built is thus classified as residential property. Examples of residential structures
include single-detached houses, semi-detached houses, and condominium-apartment.

Property type refers to the type of residential structure present on the property, that is, whether the structure is a single-detached house,
a row house, a condominium-apartment and so on. Note that not all residential structures may be accounted for, given that some
properties are still being assessed.

Condominium-apartment refers to a set of living quarters that is owned individually, while land and common elements are held in joint
ownership with others.

Condominium status refers to whether the residential structure is part of a development whereby units are individually owned while land
and common elements are held in joint ownership with others.

Value refers to the assessed value of the property for the purposes of determining property taxes. It is important to note that the
assessed value does not necessarily represent the market value. Given that different provinces and territories have their own assessment
periods and durations of the valuation roll, it is difficult to make exact comparisons of similar properties from one province or territory to
another. For properties that are being utilized for both residential and non-residential purposes, only the residential value has been taken
into account. The assessed values represented for the CMA of Vancouver are as of the latest assessment date of July 1, 2016, while the
assessed values represented for the CMA of Toronto are as of January 1, 2016.

Residency status: The definition of residency status of property owners in the Canadian Housing Statistics Program (CHSP) is coherent
with the internationally recognized concept of residence used in the Canadian System of Macroeconomic Accounts.

Infographic 1 provides examples of residency status and citizenship for individuals.

Individuals: The CHSP defines individuals as Canadian residents if they maintain their principal dwelling in the economic territory of
Canada. Being present for at least one year qualifies as having a principal dwelling in that territory. Conversely, individuals are considered
non-residents of Canada if they maintain their principal dwelling outside the economic territory of Canada.

Non-individuals: The CHSP defines non-individuals, such as corporations, trusts, stated-owned entities or related groups, as Canadian
residents if they engage in economic activities from a location in the economic territory of Canada. Conversely, non-individuals are
considered non-residents of Canada if they do not engage in economic activities from a location in the economic territory of Canada.

A property is considered "owned by residents" when the majority of owners is defined as resident. Conversely, a property is considered
"owned by non-residents" when the majority of owners is defined as non-resident. In the situation of an equal number of resident and
non-resident owners for the same property, the property is classified as "owned by residents".

10 Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X

 The Daily, Tuesday, December 19, 2017

Living area refers to the residential living space within a structure. For residential structures that have a basement, the finished basement
area is included in the total living area, while unfinished basement area is not included. The living area is measured in square feet.

Greater Vancouver A is a unique part of the Vancouver CMA that ranges from urban, suburban, seasonal use, to rural and remote
areas. The majority of the population is located at the University of British Columbia and the University Endowment Lands. For more
information, visit this website: http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/electoral-area-a/pages/default.aspx.

Available in CANSIM: tables 035-0001 to 035-0005.

Definitions, data sources and methods: survey number 5257.

The research article "Non-resident Ownership of Residential Properties in Toronto and Vancouver: Initial
Information from the Canadian Housing Statistics Program," which is part of the Economic Insights series
(11-626-X), is now available.

The infographics "Non-resident owned properties in the Vancouver  CMA" and "Non-resident owned
properties in the Toronto CMA", which are part of Statistics Canada - Infographics (11-627-M), are also
available.

For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact us
(toll-free 1-800-263-1136; 514-283-8300; STATCAN.infostats-infostats.STATCAN@canada.ca) or Media
Relations (613-951-4636; STATCAN.mediahotline-ligneinfomedias.STATCAN@canada.ca).

Component of Statistics Canada catalogue no. 11-001-X 11