[go: up one dir, main page]

100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views34 pages

Design F PSC Pier Arm

The document provides the design of pier caps for Piers P336, P337, and P380B that are part of a viaduct project in Ahmedabad, India. It includes details of the project, material properties, design loads, reference documents, and the structural geometry of the pier caps and supporting piers. The pier caps are designed for three different pier sizes - a circular pier with a 2.0m diameter, a circular pier with a 2.2m diameter, and an oblong shaped pier measuring 2.2m x 3.0m. Reinforcement ratios are calculated considering loading from the 2.0m diameter pier.

Uploaded by

Amit Rawat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
1K views34 pages

Design F PSC Pier Arm

The document provides the design of pier caps for Piers P336, P337, and P380B that are part of a viaduct project in Ahmedabad, India. It includes details of the project, material properties, design loads, reference documents, and the structural geometry of the pier caps and supporting piers. The pier caps are designed for three different pier sizes - a circular pier with a 2.0m diameter, a circular pier with a 2.2m diameter, and an oblong shaped pier measuring 2.2m x 3.0m. Reinforcement ratios are calculated considering loading from the 2.0m diameter pier.

Uploaded by

Amit Rawat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

STUP Consultants P.

Ltd
Plot No 22-A, Sector 19-C
Palm Beach Marg, Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400 705
Tel. : 022-40887777 Fax : (91-22) 7896240
Email: navimumbai@stupmail.com

OFFICE OF ORIGIN
AHMEDABAD

OWNER CLIENT
METRO LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR & AHMEDABAD (MEGA) CO.LTD.

CONTRACTOR
-

PROJECT
DETAILED DESIGN CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR VIADUCT CORRIDOR NORTH-SOUTH ( APMC to
MOTERA STATION ) ALL ELEVATED VIA-DUCT PORTIONS TO CHAINAGE -450.000 TO 15154.326 FOR
METRO–LINK EXPRESS FOR GANDHINAGAR &
AHMEDABAD (MEGA) COMPANY LTD.

TITLE
ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PIERCAP FOR PIER
P336, P337, P380B

REV. PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED


DATE MODIFICATION / PURPOSE OF ISSUE
NO. INITIALS SIGNATURE INITIALS SIGNATURE INITIALS SIGNATURE

MK/
01/07/20 R0 FOR APPROVAL APP KAR
ASG

This note is the property of DATE SHEET NOTE NO REV. NO.


STUP Consultants P. Ltd. It
should not be used, copied or 01/07/20 1+ 33 = 34 8108-E-DN-PK2-289 R0
reproduced without their
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 1 .

INDEX

SR NO. PARTICULARS

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Material Properties

3.0 Reference documents and spanning details


4.0 Load Calculations

5.0 Design Of Pier Cap of 2.0m dia pier

6.0 Design Of Pier Cap of 2.2m dia pier

7.0 Design Of Pier Cap of 2.2 x 3.0m (Oblong) pier

7.0 Annexure A

8.0 Annexure B

9.0 Annexure C

10.0 Annexure D
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 2 .

1.0 Introduction

This design note presents the design of pier cap for piers supporting 31 m span on
left side and 25 m span on Right side. For details of pier cap, please refer to the drawings
as mentioned in the reference documents. The design has been carried out as per IRS codes,
Concrete Bridge Practice by Dr. V.K. Raina.

The design is carried out for shortest height of pier i.e. 9.343m (P337) with sharpest radius of 685m

Pier cap is supported on three types of pier as listed below:


1) 2.0m diameter
2) 2.2m diameter
3) 2.2m x 3.0m oblong

Pier cap flexural reinforcement is calculated considering 2.0m diameter pier on safer side. However,
minimum reinforcement is calculted based on actual size of pier cap.
Seismic force is calculated considereing stiffer section i.e. 2.2m x 3.0m oblong shape

2.0 Material Properties

componant Concrete (mpa) E (mpa) m mc


Pier cap M 50 34000 6 8.4

HYSD - Fe 500 D
g concrete - 25 KN/m3
a - 1.17E-05 Thermal coeficient

3.0 Reference documents and spanning details

1) IRC CBC - CODE OF PRACTICE FOR PLAIN,RCC & PSC BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION
2) IRS bridge rules -
2) RDSO GUIDELINES ON SEISMIC DESIGN OF RAILWAY BRIDGES
3) Aprroved DBR -
4) Substructure drawings - MEGA-STUP-VA-NS00-PK2- 61, 62 & 63
5) Superstructure drawings - MEGA-STUP-VA-NS00-PK2-SUP-101

Left span = 31 0.85 29.3 0.85 FREE


Right span = 25 0.85 23.3 0.85 FIX

0.85 29.3 0.85 0.85 23.3 0.85


0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 3 .

0.35 1.70
2
0.3

A C

Trans
Long
Trans

2
4.0
2.6

Long

0
B D
0.8

C/S of Pier
0.8

3.2
Pier Cap
P1 P2

0.8

1.3 1.3
1.3

3.1

2.1
0.5

0.05 0.5 0.5


2

TRANSVERSE SECTION
Figure 1
Rail top level - 62.565 m
c/c of bearings in longitudinal direction - 1.70 m
c/c of bearings in transverse direction - 2.6 m
c/c of twin tracks in transverse direction - 4.2 m
Height of rolling stock - 4 m (Assumed)
Height of walk way - 1.826 m (Assumed)
Width of Walkway - 1.2 m (Min )
Overall depth of superstructure - 2.25 m
C.G of superstructure from bottom - 1.411 m
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 4 .

depth of Rail + thickness of Plinth - 0.526 m ( Assumed )


Horizontal radius - 685 m ( USER MAY ENTER '+' or "-" values)
Pedastal size - 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.3 m
Bearing size - 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.1 m
Arrester size - 1.15 x 1.1 x 0.75 m
Pier cap top level - 59.374 m
size of per cap at top - 4.00 x 3.20 m
size of pier cap at bottom - 3.10 x 3.10 m
Depth of pier cap - 1.8 m
Natural ground Level - 50.531 m
Soil fill over pile cap - 0.5 m
Pile cap top level - 50.031 m
Height of pier - 9.343 m
Dimensions of pier - 2 x 2 m Circular
Diameter of pile - 1.2 m
No. of piles in Long. Direction - 2 Nos. 3.6 m. c/c
No. of piles in Trans. Direction - 2 Nos. 3.6 m. c/c
Total piles - 4 Nos.
Thickness of pile cap - 2.2 m
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 5 .

Rail Top
62.565

Pier cap Top


59.374
9.343

Ground Level
50.531

50.031
Pile Cap Top

Figure 2
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 6 .

4.0 Load Calculations


1) Vertical Forces :-

a) Self weight
SELF WEIGHT OF SUPERSTRUCTURE

Selfweight of Left side span - 4405.80 kN


Selfweight of Right side span - 3647.00 kN
(For Self Weight of Spans Refer Annexure-A)
Reaction on Pier from left side span - 2203 kN
Reaction on Pier from right side span - 1824 kN

SELF WEIGHT OF PEDASTAL,PIERCAP AND PIER


Self weight of pedastal - 20 kN
Selfweight of pier cap - 503 kN
self weight of pier - 592 kN
self weight of seismic arrestor - 23.72 kN

b) Super imposed load


No. Load types KN/m
i) Rails + Pads 3.0
ii) Third Rail + Fixtures 2.0
iii) Concrete Plinth 34.0
iv) Cables 0.7
v) Cable trough cell 7.4
vi) Cable trays 0.1
vii) Hand-rail 0.8
viii) Miscellaneous ( OCS, Signaling) 4.0
ix) Parapet (both sides) 30.0
Total SIDL 82 85 KN/m --- say

Fixed SIDL Varying SIDL


67.2 18

Fixed Load Variable Load


Reaction on Pier from left side span - 1042 276 KN/m
Reaction on Pier from right side span - 840 223 KN/m
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 7 .

c) Live load reaction


The structure is analysed for train with six number of cars with axel load of 160 KN as per DBR.
Live load on superstructure is placed to get maximum longitudinal moment,Maximum
transverse moment & Maximum vertical load on substructure.

Case I
Ra Rc
Rb Rd

MAXIMUM LONGITUDINAL MOMENTS

Case II
Ra Rc
Rb Rd

MAXIMUM TRANSVERSE MOMENTS


Case III
Ra Rc
Rb Rd

MAXIMUM VERTICAL REACTION

Coefficient of dynamic augmentation - 1.200 left Span


1.212 Right Span
Train Loading Details
22.6

160 kN 160 kN 160 kN 160 kN

2.675 2.2 12.85 2.2 2.675

d) Temporary load of launching Girder


Load (weight) of launching girder - 5500 KN (Assumed )
Reaction on Pier - 5500 KN
Direction of launching - From Left

Direction Longitudinal case Transverse case Reaction case OSD Construction


Loads Left span Right span Left span Right span Left span Right span Left span Right span
Bearings Ra Rb Rc Rd Ra Rb Rc Rd Ra Rb Rc Rd Ra Rb Rc Rd
DL 1194 1008 962 862 1194 1008 962 862 1194 1008 962 862 4177 3526 0 0
SIDL P 566 472 443 394 566 472 443 394 566 472 443 394 0 0 0 0
SIDL V 152 127 119 106 152 127 119 106 152 127 119 106 0 0 0 0
FPLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL with CDA 822 686 0 0 1020 -266 886 -223 822 686 695 618 0 0 0 0
LL without CDA 685 571 0 0 850 -222 731 -184 685 571 579 515 0 0 0 0
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 8 .

2) Horizontal Forces :-
a) Longitudinal Forces
1.0 Tractive & Breaking forces
Tractive load is taken as 20% of the un-factored vertical live loads.
Breaking load is taken as 18% of the un-factored vertical live loads.

Direction Longitudinal case Transverse case Reaction case


Traction Force 192 192 192
Breaking Force 173 0 173

2.0 LWR Force


Ref : 8108-E-DN-PK4-813_R0
Please refer to above document, max of LWR and rail fracture force is considered.
Hence, LWR force from table is 10.00 KN/m
LWR FORCE on pier is - -250 KN

3.0 Longitudinal Seismic force


Calculation of seismic force is as per DBR
FL - 103.00 KN FL is the Force required to cause unit displacement at the
top of pier in Longitudinal direction.
I - 1.5 To be on conservative side pier section is considered as
Z - 0.16 2.2m x 3.0m oblong
R - 4
soil type - 1

Seismic force calculation considering R = 4

Longitudinal
Without LL Transverse case Reaction case OSD
case
D 7318 7318 7318 7318 8614
T 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.58
Sa/g 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.73
Ah 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.056 0.052
STRUCTUR

F 324.8 324.8 324.8 324.8 446.8


SUPER

F1 324.8 324.8 324.8 324.8 446.8


E

F2 97.4 97.4 97.4 97.4 134.0


F 62.78 62.78 62.78 62.78 57.86
PIER

F1 62.78 62.78 62.78 62.78 57.86


F2 18.83 18.83 18.83 18.83 17.36

All the longitudinal forces are applied at arrester level.


D includes full Dead load and SIDL From Super structure , 80% mass of
subrstructure.
F = full Seismic Component in Desired Direction
F1 =100% Seismic Component in Desired Direction For RDSO 100 - 30 Load
F2 =30% Seismic Component in a Direction Perpandicular to the F1 combination
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 9 .

b) Transverse force

1.0 LWR Force


Effect of LWR on curved span shall be considered as follows

T = 2234 Where, R= Radius of curved span


R T = LWR force in KN/M

T = 2234 = 3.26 KN/M


685

LWR FORCE on pier is - 91 KN

2.0 Transverse Seismic force


Calculation of seismic force is as per DBR
FT - 128 KN FT is the Force required to cause unit displacement at the top of pier in
transverse direction.
I - 1.5 To be on conservative side pier section is considered as
Z - 0.16 2.2m x 3.0m oblong
R - 4

Seismic force calculation considering R = 4

Longitudinal
Without LL Transverse case Reaction case OSD
case
D 7318 7946 7905 8493 8614
T 0.48 0.50 0.50 0.52 0.52
Sa/g 2.09 2.01 2.01 1.94 1.93
Ah 0.063 0.060 0.060 0.058 0.058
401.9 423.5 422.1 441.5 445.4
STRUCTURE

F
SUPER

F1 120.6 127.0 126.6 132.4 133.6


F2 401.9 423.5 422.1 441.5 445.4
L.A. 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7
F 69.99 67.2 67.3 65.0 64.5
PIER

F1 21.0 20.1 20.2 19.5 19.4


F2 70.0 67.2 67.3 65.0 64.5

D includes full Dead load and SIDL From Super structure , 80% mass of
subrstructure and 50% live Load where ever applicable.
F = full Seismic Component in Desired Direction
F1 =100% Seismic Component in Desired Direction For RDSO 100 - 30 Load
F2 =30% Seismic Component in a Direction Perpandicular to the F1 combination
L.A. :- Lever arm between C.G of Superstructure and Top of Bearings
0 Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 10 .

3.0 Centrifugal Force

Radius of curvature (R) - 685 m


Maximum allowed speed (V) - 90 km/h

Centrifugal force (C) - W V2 where, W is axle load on span.


127 R

Direction Longitudinal case Transverse case Reaction case


Cetrifugal force 117 109 219

4.0 Wind Force

Basic wind speed for ahmadabad Vb - 39 m/s


Probability Factor k1 - 1.06
Terrain height & structure size factor k2 - 1.03
Topography factor k3 - 1
Design wind speed at any height Vz - K1 x K2 x K3 x Vb
Vz - 42.58 m/s
2
Design Wind Pressure pz - 0.6 x Vz2 N/m
2
- 1088 N/m
2
pz - 1.088 KN/m
Basic Area of super structure (Span1+Span2) x x Ht. of Ht. Of
+
2 Walk Way superstrucure
- 114 m2
Area as per IRS 2.11.3 (a) - 171 m2

Wind load Unloaded track


For unloaded track - 1.088 kN/m2
Point load at c.g. of Super structure - 186 kN Acting at c.g

Wind load loaded track


Wind on Superstructure with unloaded track along with wind load on
Ht.Live load.
of Rolling Ht. of Walk
Exposed area for LL - (Span1+Span2) Stock Way
2
-

Exposed area for LL - 61 m2


Wind on LL - 66 kN Acting 2 m above Rail lvl.
L.A - 5.19 M

5.0 Nosing Force - 100 KN


Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 11 .

5 Design of pier cap 2.0m diameter Pier

Pier cap design has been carried out as per IRS CBC and Concrete Bridge Practice by Dr. V.K. Raina.

5.1 Reaction on Bearings

5.1.1 Vertical Reaction Due to Vertical loads (DL,SIDL,LL)

Bearings P1 P2 Torsion
Ra+Rc Rb+Rd
Ra (kN) Rb (kN) Rc (kN) Rd (kN) kN-m
Load (kN) (kN)
DL 1325 1139 1093 992 2418 2132 198
SIDL FIX 566 472 443 394 1010 866 104
SIDL VAR 152 127 119 106 271 233 28
WITH CDA

LL ML 822 686 0 0 822 686 698


LL MT 1020 -266 886 -223 1906 -489 113
LL MR 822 686 695 618 1517 1303 108
OSD CONS 4177 3526 0 0 4177 3526 3550

5.1.2 Vertical Reaction Due Horizontal forces (Longitudinal Direction)

As, all the longitudinal forces are applied at arrester level. Hence no vertical reaction will
develop because of these forces.

Bearings P1 P2 Torsion
Ra+Rc Rb+Rd
Ra (kN) Rb (kN) Rc (kN) Rd (kN) kN-m
Load (kN) (kN)
BR-TR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LWR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL NOLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
100% IN LONG DIR.

EQL ML 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL MT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL MR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL OSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL NOLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30% IN LONG DIR.

EQL ML 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL MT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL MR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
EQL OSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 12 .

5.1.3 Vertical Reaction Due Horizontal forces (Transverse Direction)

Horizontal Force +ve drection


C.G of racks
1.8

0.526

C.G of Box
Girder 2.25
1.411

2.6
Ra Rb
Figure 3

Horz. Bearings P1 P2 Torsion


Lever
Force Ra+Rc Rb+Rd
arm (m) Ra (kN) Rb (kN) Rc (kN) Rd (kN) kN-m
Load (kN) (kN) (kN)
LWR 91.00 2.776 97.16 -97.16 97.16 -97.16 194.32 -194.32 0
30% IN TRANS. DIR. 100% IN TRANS. DIR.

EQT NOLL 401.901 1.411 119.3 -119.3 98.8 -98.8 218.1 -218.1 17
EQT ML 423.5 4.576* 745.4 -745.4 0.0 0.0 745.4 -745.4 634
EQT MT 422.139 4.576* 395.3 -395.3 347.6 -347.6 743.0 -743.0 41
EQT MR 441.488 4.576* 415.3 -415.3 361.7 -361.7 777.0 -777.0 46
EQT OSD 445.389 2.776* 475.5 -475.5 0.0 0.0 475.5 -475.5 404
EQT NOLL 120.57 1.411 35.8 -35.8 29.6 -29.6 65.4 -65.4 5
EQT ML 127.05 4.576 223.6 -223.6 0.0 0.0 223.6 -223.6 190
EQT MT 126.642 4.576 118.6 -118.6 104.3 -104.3 222.9 -222.9 12
EQT MR 132.446 4.576 124.6 -124.6 108.5 -108.5 233.1 -233.1 14
EQT OSD 133.617 2.776 142.7 -142.7 0.0 0.0 142.7 -142.7 121
CF ML 117 4.576 205.8 -205.8 0.0 0 205.8 -205.8 175
CF MT 109 4.576 102.5 -102.5 90.1 -90.1 192.5 -192.5 11
CF MR 219 4.576 205.8 -205.8 179.3 -179.3 385.1 -385.1 23
WL W/O LL 186 1.411 55.9 -55.9 45.1 -45.1 101.1 -101.1 9
WL ON LL 66 4.776 67.3 -67.3 54.3 -54.3 121.6 -121.6 11
WL DLLL 123.3 -123.3 99.4 -99.4 222.7 -222.7 20
NOSING 100 2.776 53.4 -53.4 53.4 -53.4 106.8 -106.8 0

"*" Seismic forces due to DL and LL in transverse direction considerde at 4.576 m


(2.25+0.526+1.8) above bearing level on conservative side.
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 13 .

5.1.4 Vertical Seismic force CL-6.8 - RDSO GUIDELINE PAGE NO. 21

Av - 2/3 x Horizontal seismic componant (Ah)

Without LL Long case Trans case Reaction case OSD


D 7317.84 7945.84 7905.34 8492.84 8614.34
Av 0.042 0.040 0.040 0.039 0.039
F 306.05 318.92 318.10 329.71 332.06
F1 306.05 318.92 318.10 329.71 332.06
F2 91.82 95.67 95.43 98.91 99.62

F = full Seismic Component in Desired Direction


F1 =100% Seismic Component in Desired Direction
F2 =30% Seismic Component in a Direction Perpandicular to the F1

Bearings P1 P2 Torsion
Ra+Rc Rb+Rd
Ra (kN) Rb (kN) Rc (kN) Rd (kN) kN-m
Load (kN) (kN)
EQV NOLL 90.8 76.7 73.1 65.5 164 142 15
100% IN VER DIR.

EQV ML 110.2 92.4 61.4 54.9 172 147 41


EQV MT 119.2 54.6 98.0 46.3 217 101 18
EQV MR 97.7 81.9 79.3 70.7 177 153 16
EQV OSD 180.1 152.0 0.0 0.0 180 152 153
EQV NOLL 27.2 23.0 21.9 19.6 49 43 5
30% IN VER DIR.

EQV ML 33.1 27.7 18.4 16.5 51 44 12


EQV MT 35.8 16.4 29.4 13.9 65 30 5
EQV MR 29.3 24.6 23.8 21.2 53 46 5
EQV OSD 54.0 45.6 0.0 0.0 54 46 46
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 14 .

5.2 Summary of Forces on Piercap


Sr no. L/C no. P1 (kN) T (kN-m)

1 2001 6811.64 1962.1


2 2002 8685.37 650.493
3 2003 8341.7 661.552
4 2004 4988.4 448.441
5 2005 6693.04 1681.77
6 2006 8192.02 632.49
7 2007 7917.08 641.337
8 2008 8452.11 4862.56
9 2009 4862.99 434.326
10 2010 5092.01 452.668
11 2011 5035.09 450.112
12 2012 5588.33 1099.38
13 2013 6214.43 1631.57
14 2014 5732.49 1134.2
15 2015 6139.25 502.718
16 2016 6763.34 536.76
17 2017 6321.74 517.868
18 2018 6038.83 506.818
19 2019 6691.53 545.064
20 2020 6187.53 519.96
21 2021 3473.55 308.962
22 2022 3702.56 327.304
23 2023 3645.64 324.748
24 2024 2575.2 331.53
25 2025 2841.5 557.887
26 2026 2676.03 417.236
Max 8685.37 4862.56
Min 2575.2 308.962
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 15 .

5.3 Design of Pier cap 2.0 m pier diameter in transverse direction

5.3.1 Piercap is Designed as corbel as (a/d) ratio is less than 0.6

Vu
Hu

S
h d'

Figure 4

fck = 50 Mpa
fc' = 40 Mpa
fy = 500 Mpa
a = 420 mm ( For pier dia 2000mm)
S = 900 mm ( Depth of cap at face of bearing)
h = 1800 mm
Cover = 50 mm
hence d' = 1738 mm
and d = 1390.4 mm

Vu = 8685 kN Maximum Vu
Hu = 1737 kN Taken as 0.2Vu

b = 3200 mm

Conditions
1) a = 420 = 0.24166 < 0.6 Hence OK
d' 1738

2) S = 900 = 0.51784 > 0.5 Hence OK


d' 1738
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 16 .

3) Vu = 8685.37 x 1000 = 1.95 Mpa < 6 Mpa


bd 3200 x 1390.4 Hence OK

Shear Friction reinforcement

Avf = Vu = 8685 x 1000


0.85 x fsy x m 0.85 x 500 x 1.4

2
= 14597.3 mm
Direct Tension reinforcement

At = Hu = 1737 x 1000
0.85 x fsy 0.85 x 500
2
= 4087.24 mm
FlexuralTension reinforcement

Af = Vu x a + Hu (h - d')
0.85 x fsy x d

= 8685 x 420 + 1737 ( 1800 - 1738 ) x 1000


0.85 x 500 x 1390.4

2
= 6355.44 mm

Total Primary Tensile reinforcement

2
As = Af + At = 10443 mm

2
= 2/3Avf + At = 13819 mm

2
= 0.04fc' x bd' = 17797 mm
fsy
As is max of these three Conditions
2
Hence As = 17797 mm

2
provide 25 dia 40 no.s = 19635 mm OK

Total Shear reinforcement

Ah = 0.5 x Af = 3178 mm2


= 0.333 x Avf = 4861 mm2
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 17 .

Ah is max of these two Conditions

Hence Ah = 4861 mm2

This reinforcement needs to be provided in a depth of d' - d'/3 i.e 1159 mm

provide 10 legged 12 dia in 6 Layers = 6786 mm2 OK

Total Vertical Stirrups

Av = 0.5 (Vu-Vc)*p
fsy d

Vc = 10 bd = 444928 kg
= 4365 kN

p = Pitch = 125 mm (Assume)

Av = 0.5 x ( 8685 - 4365 )x 1000 x 125


500 x 1390.4

2
= 388 mm
Vetical Stirrups are provided as combination of Refinforcements, therefore
provide 2 legged 20 dia @ 125 c/c = 628.3 mm2 "OUTER"
2
provide 4 legged 12 dia @ 125 c/c = 452 mm "INNER"
hence Total Shear Reinf. = 1081 Hence OK
5.3.2 Torsional Check

Torsional stress, vt = 2T for rectangular c/s section


2
h min(hmax-hmin/3)

Maximum T = 4863 kN-m

hmin = 1800 mm
hmax = 3200 mm

hence vt = 2 x 4863 x 1000000


1800 x 1800 ( 3200 - 1800 / 3)

= 1.15 Mpa

vtmin = 0.42 mpa (Table 17)


Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No. 18 .

Since vt min is less than vt, torsional reinforcement is required.

Check for combined stresses due to shear and Torsion

v+vt = 1.95 + 1.15 = 3.11 mpa


< 4.5 mpa Hence OK

Torsion reinforcement shall be provided Such that

Ast >= T
Sv 1.6 x1 y1(0.87fyv)

x1 - the smaller centre line dimension of the stirrups = 1688 mm


y1 - the larger centre line dimension of the stirrups = 3088 mm

hence Ast = 4863 x 1000000 x 125


1.6 X 1688 X 3088 X 0.87 X 415

= 202 mm2
Hence outer loop must have area = 202 mm2
Provided area of outer loop = 314 mm2 Hence OK

AsL satisfies equation 11 with the value of Ast calculated as in equation 10.a (Cl 15.4.4.4)

AsL >= Ast x fyv


SL Sv fyL

Ast x fyv = 202 x 415 = 1.34


Sv fyL 125 500

AsL = 491 = 3.17 Hence Ok


SL 155
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.

5.4 DESIGN OF PIERCAP IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION 2.0M DIAMETER OF PIER

The pier cap has been designed as corbel in the transverse direction as the ratio of span by
depth is less than 0.6 as specified in the IRS.

In the longitudinal direction, the distance between the bearings centre is 1.7m and the size of
the equivalent square of the 2.0m diameter pier is 1.772m x 1.772m.

The lever arm is 0 m for 2.0m diameter of pier.

Therefore, the reinforcement in the pier caps in the longitudinal direction has been provided
as per the minimum reinforcement clause as given in Dr. V.K Raina's book.

Total primary tensile reinforcement = 0.04 fc' x b d'


fsy

fc' = 40 M Pa ( 80% of fck)


fsy = 500 M Pa
b = 4000 mm
d' = 1738 mm

As = 22246.4 mm2

Adopted dia = 25 mm
Nos required = 45.31999 Nos
Say = 48 Nos
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.

6.0 DESIGN OF PIERCAP OF 2.2m DIA. PIER

6.1 DESIGN OF PIERCAP IN TRANSEVERSE DIRECTION


The pier cap has been designed as corbel in the transverse direction as the ratio of span by
depth is less than 0.6 as specified in the IRS.

The pier cap size (4.0m x 3.2m) is same for pier dia 2.0m and 2.2m.
In the Transverse direction, the distance between the bearings centre is 2.6m and the size of
the equivalent square of the 2.2m diameter pier is 1.95m x 1.95m. Hence, the lever arm is
(2.6/2-1.95/2) 0.325m in transverse direction which is less than 0.420m (0.420m is the lever arm
for 2.0m dia pier).

Here reinforcement required is considered same as 2.0m diameter pier on safer side,
which is as below:

2
Shear Friction reinforcement Avf = 14597.3 mm
2
Direct Tension reinforcement At = 4087.2 mm
2
FlexuralTension reinforcement Af = 6355.4 mm

The requirement of minimum reinforcement is same because size of pier cap for 2.0m
and 2.2m dia is same.
So, total Primary Tensile reinforcement

As = Af + At = 10443 mm2

= 2/3Avf + At = 13819 mm2

= 0.04fc' x bd' = 17797 mm2


fsy
As is max of these three Conditions
Hence As = 17797 mm2
2
provided 25 dia 40 no.s = 19634.95 mm OK

6.2 DESIGN OF PIERCAP IN LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION

In the longitudinal direction, the distance between the bearings centre is 1.7m and the size of
the equivalent square of the pier is 1.95m x 1.95m.

The lever arm is 0 m for 2.2m diameter of pier.

Therefore, the reinforcement in the pier caps in the longitudinal direction has been provided
as per the minimum reinforcement clause as given in Dr. V.K Raina's book.

Total primary tensile reinforcement = 0.04 fc' x b d'


fsy
fc' = 40 M Pa ( 80% of fck)
fsy = 500 M Pa
b = 4000 mm
d' = 1738 mm
As = 22246.4 mm2

Adopted dia = 25 mm
Nos required = 45.31999 Nos
Say = 48 Nos
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
7.0 Annexure -A (Left Span)

Because of the curvature, reactions on the inner and outer side of the bearings will be dirrerent

A B

C
D

Eccentric momment calculation on the curved span

Span length ( L) = 31 m
Radius of the curvature ( R) = 685 m
No of segment having length 2m = 2
No of segment having length 3m = 9
Encloesd angle by arc of circle ( θ) = L / (2π R) x360
= 2.593 ...... In degree
= 0.045 ....... Radian
Length of the chord = 2 x R sin(θ/2)
= 30.997 m
Distance PQ = 15.499 m

R-a

α Q
P
T C

a
R
R R

θ α

O
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
2 2)
Distance OQ = SQRT( OP - PQ
= 684.82464 m
Seg No Length Length Length Distance Perpendicular
S1 2 2 1 685 0.022
S2 3 5 3.5 684.930 0.070
S3 3 8 6.5 684.884 0.116
S4 3 11 9.5 684.851 0.149
S5 3 14 12.5 684.831 0.169
S5 3 17 15.5 684.825 0.175
S5 3 20 18.5 684.831 0.169
S4 3 23 21.5 684.851 0.149
S3 3 26 24.5 684.884 0.116
S2 3 29 27.5 684.930 0.070
S1 2 31 30 684.978 0.022
0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000

FOR LHS SPAN

A) For dead load

Seg NO DL Segment Lever Arm Torsion


S1 387.1 0.022 8.5
S2 467 0.070 32.8
S3 393.8 0.116 45.8
S4 385.9 0.149 57.5
S5 379.4 0.169 64.0
S5 379.4 0.175 66.5
S5 379.4 0.169 64.0
S4 385.9 0.149 57.5
S3 393.8 0.116 45.8
S2 467 0.070 32.8
S1 387.1 0.022 8.5
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 483.8 kN-m

This torsion gets distributed at each end = 241.9 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 93.0 kN
Total DL of the span = 4405.8 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
DL 1101.45 1101.45 1101.45 1101.45
DL Curvature 93.0 93.0345 -93.0 -93.0
Resultant DL 1194.5 1194.5 1008.4 1008.4
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
B) For SIDL

There are two types of SIDL Viz., Fixed and Variable. Their intensities are
as under:

Fixed : 67 kN/m
Variable : 18 kN/m

i) FIXED
Seg NO SIDL Lever Arm Torsion
S1 134 0.021896 2.934072
S2 201 0.070251 14.12039
S3 201 0.116234 23.36308
S4 201 0.14908 29.96514
S5 201 0.168788 33.92642
S5 201 0.175357 35.24685
S5 201 0.168788 33.92642
S4 201 0.14908 29.96514
S3 201 0.116234 23.36308
S2 201 0.070251 14.12039
S1 134 0.021896 2.934072
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Total Torsion = 243.9 kN-m

This torsion gets distributed at each end = 121.9 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 46.9 kN
Total DL of the span = 2077 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
SIDL FIXED 519.25 519.25 519.25 519.25
SIDL Curvature 46.90 46.90 -46.90 -46.90
Resultant SIDL FIX 566.1 566.1 472.4 472.4

ii) Variable
Seg NO SIDL Lever Arm Torsion
S1 36 0.022 0.788258
S2 54 0.070 3.793537
S3 54 0.116 6.276649
S4 54 0.149 8.050335
S5 54 0.169 9.11456
S5 54 0.175 9.469304
S5 54 0.169 9.11456
S4 54 0.149 8.050335
S3 54 0.116 6.276649
S2 54 0.070 3.793537
S1 36 0.022 0.788258
0 0 0.000 0
0 0 0.000 0
Total Torsion = 65.5 kN-m
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
This torsion gets distributed at each end = 32.8 kN-m
Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 12.6 kN
Total DL of the span = 558 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
SIDL FIXED 139.5 139.5 139.5 139.5
SIDL Curvature 12.6 12.6 -12.6 -12.6
Resultant SIDL FIX 152.1 152.1 126.9 126.9

C) For Live load

In the live load, there are two case, one with the one lane loaded and in
the other, both lane loaded.

i) Single track loaded.


Total EUDL corresponding to the span = 1256 kN
UDL = 40.5 kN/m
Eccentricity of the EUDL from C/L = 2.1 m

Torsional moment due to above = 2638 kN-m


Torsion at one end = 1319 kN-m

Seg NO LOAD Lever Arm Torsion


S1 81.03226 0.022 1.8
S2 121.5484 0.070 8.5
S3 121.5484 0.116 14.1
S4 121.5484 0.149 18.1
S5 121.5484 0.169 20.5
S5 121.5484 0.175 21.3
S5 121.5484 0.169 20.5
S4 121.5484 0.149 18.1
S3 121.5484 0.116 14.1
S2 121.5484 0.070 8.5
S1 81.03226 0.022 1.8
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 147.5 kN-m

Total torsion on the span = 1392.5 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 535.6 kN

Total Load on the span = 1256.0 kN

Reaction on the bearing w/o curvature = 314.0 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
One track loaded 314.0 314.0 314.0 314.0
Due to curvature 535.6 535.6 -535.6 -535.6
Resultant 849.6 849.6 -221.6 -221.6
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.

ii) Double track loaded.


Total EUDL corresponding to the span = 2512 kN
UDL = 81 kN/m

Seg NO LOAD Lever Arm Torsion


S1 162.0645 0.022 3.5
S2 243.0968 0.070 17.1
S3 243.0968 0.116 28.3
S4 243.0968 0.149 36.2
S5 243.0968 0.169 41.0
S5 243.0968 0.175 42.6
S5 243.0968 0.169 41.0
S4 243.0968 0.149 36.2
S3 243.0968 0.116 28.3
S2 243.0968 0.070 17.1
S1 162.0645 0.022 3.5
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 294.9 kN-m

Total torsion on the span = 147.5 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.60 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 56.7 kN

Total Load on the span = 2512.0 kN

Reaction on the bearing w/o curvature = 628.0 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
One track loaded 628.0 628.0 628.0 628.0
Due to curvature 56.7 56.7 -56.7 -56.7
Resultant 684.7 684.7 571.3 571.3
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
7.0 Annexure -A (Right Span)

Because of the curvature, reactions on the inner and outer side of the bearings will be dirrerent

A B

C
D

Eccentric momment calculation on the curved span

Span length ( L) = 25 m
Radius of the curvature ( R) = 685 m
No of segment having length 2m = 2
No of segment having length 3m = 7
Encloesd angle by arc of circle ( θ) = L / (2π R) x360
= 2.091 ...... In degree
= 0.036 ....... Radian
Length of the chord = 2 x R sin(θ/2)
= 24.999 m
Distance PQ = 12.499 m

R-a

α Q
P
T C

a
R
R R

θ α

O
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
2 2)
Distance OQ = SQRT( OP - PQ
= 684.88595 m
Seg No Length Length Length Distance Perpendicular
S1 2 2 1 685 0.018
S2 3 5 3.5 685 0.055
S3 3 8 6.5 685 0.088
S4 3 11 9.5 685 0.107
S5 3 14 12.5 685 0.114
S4 3 17 15.5 685 0.107
S3 3 20 18.5 685 0.088
S2 3 23 21.5 685 0.055
S1 2 25 24 685 0.018
0 0 0 0 0 0.000
0 0 0 0 0 0.000
0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000
0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000

FOR RHS SPAN

A) For dead load

Seg NO DL Segment Lever Arm Torsion


S1 387.1 0.018 6.8
S2 467 0.055 25.6
S3 393.8 0.088 34.6
S4 385.9 0.107 41.5
S5 379.4 0.114 43.3
S4 385.9 0.107 41.5
S3 393.8 0.088 34.6
S2 467 0.055 25.6
S1 387.1 0.018 6.8
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 260.2 kN-m

This torsion gets distributed at each end = 130.1 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 50.0 kN
Total DL of the span = 3647 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
DL 911.75 911.75 911.75 911.75
DL Curvature 50.04 50.04 -50.0 -50.0
Resultant DL 961.8 961.8 861.7 861.7
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
B) For SIDL

There are two types of SIDL Viz., Fixed and Variable. Their intensities are
as under:

Fixed : 67 kN/m
Variable : 18 kN/m

i) FIXED
Seg NO SIDL Lever Arm Torsion
S1 134 0.017517 2.347325
S2 201 0.054925 11.03986
S3 201 0.087771 17.64192
S4 201 0.107479 21.6032
S5 201 0.114048 22.92363
S4 201 0.107479 21.6032
S3 201 0.087771 17.64192
S2 201 0.054925 11.03986
S1 134 0.017517 2.347325
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Total Torsion = 128.2 kN-m

This torsion gets distributed at each end = 64.1 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 24.7 kN
Total DL of the span = 1675 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
SIDL FIXED 418.75 418.75 418.75 418.75
SIDL Curvature 24.65 24.65 -24.7 -24.7
Resultant SIDL FIX 443.4 443.4 394.1 394.1

ii) Variable
Seg NO SIDL Lever Arm Torsion
S1 36 0.018 0.630625
S2 54 0.055 2.965933
S3 54 0.088 4.739619
S4 54 0.107 5.803844
S5 54 0.114 6.158588
S4 54 0.107 5.803844
S3 54 0.088 4.739619
S2 54 0.055 2.965933
S1 36 0.018 0.630625
0 0 0.000 0
0 0 0.000 0
0 0 0.000 0
0 0 0.000 0
Total Torsion = 34.4 kN-m
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.
This torsion gets distributed at each end = 17.2 kN-m
Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 6.6 kN
Total DL of the span = 450 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
SIDL FIXED 112.5 112.5 112.5 112.5
SIDL Curvature 6.6 6.6 -6.6 -6.6
Resultant SIDL FIX 119.1 119.1 105.9 105.9

C) For Live load

In the live load, there are two case, one with the one lane loaded and in
the other, both lane loaded.

i) Single track loaded.


Total EUDL corresponding to the span = 1094 kN
UDL = 43.8 kN/m
Eccentricity of the EUDL from C/L = 2.1 m

Torsional moment due to above = 2297 kN-m


Torsion at one end = 1149 kN-m

Seg NO LOAD Lever Arm Torsion


S1 87.52 0.018 1.5
S2 131.28 0.055 7.2
S3 131.28 0.088 11.5
S4 131.28 0.107 14.1
S5 131.28 0.114 15.0
S4 131.28 0.107 14.1
S3 131.28 0.088 11.5
S2 131.28 0.055 7.2
S1 87.52 0.018 1.5
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 83.7 kN-m

Total torsion on the span = 1190.6 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 457.9 kN

Total Load on the span = 1094.0 kN

Reaction on the bearing w/o curvature = 273.5 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
One track loaded 273.5 273.5 273.5 273.5
Due to curvature 457.9 457.9 -457.9 -457.9
Resultant 731.4 731.4 -184.4 -184.4
Date : 01/07/20 DN No.
8108-E-DN-PK2-289
Design by : APP Page No.

ii) Single track loaded.


Total EUDL corresponding to the span = 2188 kN
UDL = 87.5 kN/m

Seg NO LOAD Lever Arm Torsion


S1 175.04 0.018 3.1
S2 262.56 0.055 14.4
S3 262.56 0.088 23.0
S4 262.56 0.107 28.2
S5 262.56 0.114 29.9
S4 262.56 0.107 28.2
S3 262.56 0.088 23.0
S2 262.56 0.055 14.4
S1 175.04 0.018 3.1
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
0 0 0.000 0.0
Total Torsion = 167.4 kN-m

Total torsion on the span = 83.7 kN-m


Distance between bearings in Trans direction = 2.6 m
Uplift/ Downward reaction due to torsion = 32.2 kN

Total Load on the span = 2188.0 kN

Reaction on the bearing w/o curvature = 547.0 kN

Component RA RB RC RD
One track loaded 547.0 547.0 547.0 547.0
Due to curvature 32.2 32.2 -32.2 -32.2
Resultant 579.2 579.2 514.8 514.8
Date : 01/07/20 DN No. 8108-E-DN-PK2-289

Design by : APP Page No. 19 .

8.0 ANNEXURE-B

Weight calculation of segments


Segment Area at Area at
Sr.No. Length Volume Weight
No. Start End
1 S1 6.449 6.449 0.6 3.869 96.7
10.304 10.304 0.7 7.213 180.3
9.407 9.407 0.425 3.998 99.9
2.690 2.69 0.15 0.404 10.1
Total 387.1
2 S2 6.449 5.442 3 17.837 445.9
Blister 0.448 0.679 0.75 0.845 21.1
Total 467.0
3 S3 5.442 5.058 3 15.750 393.8
4 S4 5.058 5.058 3 15.174 379.4
Deviator 0.436 0.436 0.3 0.2616 6.54
Total 385.9
5 S5 5.058 5.058 3 15.174 379.4

Span S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Total
22 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
3267.6
2 2 2 2
25 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
3647.0
2 2 2 2 1
28 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
4026.4
2 2 2 2 2
31 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
4405.8
2 2 2 2 3
34 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
4785.2
2 2 2 2 4
37 387.1 467 393.8 385.9 379.4
5164.6
2 2 2 2 5

Weight Unit : kN
IRS G I GII WIND ONLY G II With LL + (WIND) RDSO COMBINATION A1 RDSO - COMBINATION A2 RDSO - Combination A3 RDSO C1
9.0 ANNEXURE-C - LOAD COMBINATION 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
1 DL 2417.9 197.8 2464.5 241.9 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1 1
2 SILD P 1009.5 104.3 1038.5 121.9 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.9 0.9 0.9
3 SIDL V 271.2 28.0 279.0 32.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.8 0.8 0.8
4 LL ML 821.7 698.4 1507.2 177.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
5 LL MT 1905.6 113.4 753.6 1671.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
6 LL MR 1516.7 107.6 1507.2 177.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
7 WL WO LL 101.1 9.2 0.0 145.5 1.6
8 WL W LL 222.7 20.3 0.0 320.5 1.25 1.25 1.25
9 EQL 100 NO LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5
10 EQT 30 NO LL 65.4 5.2 0.0 93.1 1.5 1.5
11 EQ V 30 NO LL 49.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5
12 EQL 30 NO LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5
13 EQT 100 NO LL 218.1 17.5 0.0 310.3 1.5 1.5
14 EQ V 30 NO LL 49.2 4.5 50.2 5.5 1.5 1.5
15 EQL 30 NO LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5
16 EQT 30NO LL 65.4 5.2 0.0 93.1 1.5 1.5
17 EQ V 100 NO LL 163.9 15.0 167.4 18.4 1.5 1.5
18 EQL ML 100 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
19 EQT ML 30 LL 223.6 190.1 0.0 581.4 1.2
20 EQV ML 30 LL 51.5 12.4 60.8 6.9 1.2
21 EQL ML 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
22 EQT ML 100 LL 745.4 633.6 0.0 1937.9 1.2
23 EQV ML 30 LL 51.5 12.4 60.8 6.9 1.2
24 EQL ML 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
25 EQT ML 30 LL 223.6 190.1 0.0 581.4 1.2
26 EQV ML 100 LL 171.6 41.5 202.6 23.1 1.2
27 EQL MT 100 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
28 EQT MT 30 L 222.9 12.2 0.0 308.4 1.2
29 EQV MT 30 L 65.2 5.4 52.1 25.2 1.2
30 EQL MT 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
31 EQT MT 100 L 743.0 40.5 0.0 1027.8 1.2
32 EQV MT 30 L 65.2 5.4 52.1 25.2 1.2
33 EQL MT 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
34 EQT MT 30 L 222.9 12.2 0.0 308.4 1.2
35 EQV MT 100 L 217.3 18.0 173.8 84.1 1.2
36 EQL MR 100 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
37 EQT MR 30 LL 233.1 13.7 0.0 323.9 1.2
38 EQV MR 30 LL 53.1 4.7 53.9 6.1 1.2
39 EQL MR 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
40 EQT MR 100 LL 777.0 45.5 0.0 1079.8 1.2
41 EQV MR 30 LL 53.1 4.7 53.9 6.1 1.2
42 EQL MR 30 LL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2
43 EQT MR 30 LL 233.1 13.7 0.0 323.9 1.2
44 EQV MR 100 LL 177.0 15.6 179.7 20.5 1.2
45 EQL OSD 100 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
46 EQT OSD 30 142.7 121.3 0.0 370.9 0.8
47 EQV OSD 30 54.0 45.9 99.6 10.9 0.8
48 EQL OSD 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
49 EQT OSD 100 475.5 404.2 0.0 1236.4 0.8
50 EQV OSD 30 54.0 45.9 99.6 10.9 0.8
51 EQL OSD 30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8
52 EQT OSD 30 142.7 121.3 0.0 370.9 0.8
53 EQV OSD 100 180.1 153.0 332.1 36.5 0.8
54 CF ML 205.8 174.9 0.0 535.1 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
55 CF MT 192.5 10.5 0.0 266.4 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
56 CF MR 385.1 22.6 0.0 535.1 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
57 BRTR ML 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
58 BRTR MT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
59 BRTR MR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
60 LWR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
61 ERECTION 4176.8 3550.2 7702.9 845.8 1.3
62 NOSING 106.8 0.0 0.0 138.8 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Ra + Rc Torsion Ra + Rb Torsion
6811.64 8685.37 8341.70 4988.40 6693.04 8192.02 7917.08 8452.11 4862.99 5092.01 5035.09 5588.33 6214.43 5732.49 6139.25 6763.34 6321.74 6038.83 6691.53 6187.53 3473.55 3702.56 3645.64 2575.20 2841.50 2676.03
1962.10 650.49 661.55 448.44 1681.77 632.49 641.34 4862.56 434.33 452.67 450.11 1099.38 1631.57 1134.20 502.72 536.76 517.87 506.82 545.06 519.96 308.96 327.30 324.75 331.53 557.89 417.24
7574.33 6255.53 7574.33 4936.73 7046.81 5991.77 7046.81 13094.37 4797.23 4872.58 5048.39 5623.76 5623.76 5793.96 5236.59 5236.59 5382.58 5615.50 5615.50 5766.42 3375.88 3451.23 3627.05 2544.17 2544.17 2730.13
2009.37 4153.68 2009.37 753.03 2112.23 3827.67 2112.23 1401.93 643.53 977.58 671.11 1635.34 3263.21 1654.76 1942.31 2805.69 2012.94 1325.46 2232.46 1342.67 493.26 827.31 520.84 547.38 1239.76 567.80

You might also like