1
Shared Governance in Perianesthesia Nursing
                Mary Egger
          University of Saint Mary
         NU 749 Capstone Synthesis
                Dr. Kidder
               July 24, 2022
                                                                                                       2
                         Shared Governance in Perianesthesia Nursing
       Nursing culture and workplace morale ultimately influence patient care and policy
formation. Inpatient hospital units with practice councils are part of shared governance. Shared
governance supports nurses to pursue autonomy in the nursing profession (Kyytsönen et al.,
2020). Nurses are encouraged to work together to make positive workplace changes within
practice councils. The nurses involved in a practice council can educate staff nurses on issues
specific to their practice. This gives nurses the power and confidence to better their patient care
practices. Shared governance councils are part of Magnet designation, which ultimately
determines the quality of patient care (Hu et al., 2021). Councils promote the professional
development of the nurse (Bleich, 2018). Shared governance is absent within the University of
Kansas Health System’s Post Anesthesia Care Unit. Nurses are being deprived the ability to
make changes in their workplace. This causes feelings of unhappiness and low morale.
Preliminary data has been collected to determine the current status of nursing morale. The
problem with the lack of a shared governance council is the negative impact of workflow-related
problems, unit morale, and retention.
       The capstone project’s focus is to create a practice council for the Post Anesthesia Care
Unit (PACU) at the University of Kansas Health System. Shared governance will improve
advocacy for the nurse's role in the PACU setting. One of the goals in improving nurse advocacy
is also improving the quality of patient care. The staff nurses in the PACU are looking for a way
to grow as nurses and improve overall morale. This opportunity will be beneficial to the morale
of the unit as a whole. Shared governance promotes a positive practice environment to satisfy
patients and increase retention rates (Siller et al., 2016). The goal is to create shared governance
among nurses and improve the quality of patient care, retention, and staff morale.
                                                                                                       3
                                            Literature Search
       The literature review began with a search on the ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health
Source database. The terms “practice council” and “nursing” were entered into the search bar.
There were 137,166 results before the search was narrowed down. The search was modified to
filter articles that were full text, peer-reviewed, and from 2016 to the present. This displayed
28,007 results, even when narrowed down. The articles within this search are seemingly not
relevant to the purpose of my research. Alternately, the terms “shared governance” and “nursing”
were entered into the search bar with 9,267 results. When narrowed down using the same filters
as before, there are 2,534 results. The articles within this search are more relevant, and the term
“shared governance” will be used in application to the development of a practice council for the
purpose of this research.
       The search for articles continued in the CINAHL Complete database. The term “shared
governance” and “nursing” was entered, and 1,236 articles resulted. The term “practice council”
did not yield any results that were relevant to the research. The articles were filtered the same as
they were in the ProQuest database. There are 74 articles that remained. The amount of articles
in the CINAHL search is more manageable than the ProQuest search.
                                        Literature Review
       The current state of shared governance was examined through the literature. The
literature review revealed what authors and researchers view shared governance to be in the
nursing profession. It can be said that shared governance has the potential to be a powerful force
in nursing. The basis of research begins with a review of the literature. Many articles were
examined to extract information that will provide structure and inspiration for a shared
governance council in perianesthesia nursing.
                                                                                                     4
           The majority of the articles reviewed were literature reviews. This helps examine more
literature and uncover other sources of information. A commonly cited source was Timothy
Porter-O’Grady. Upon further research, Timothy Porter-O’Grady has written a comprehensive
book about shared governance called Implementing Shared Governance Creating a Professional
Organization. His definition of shared governance is known as the process in which
empowerment comes from shared decision-making within nursing (Boswell et al., 2017). This
came from an article about shared governance in academic nursing. This is the only article that
showed how shared governance could be applied to an academic setting. This makes this article
unique and adds a different perspective to this project. Though this project does not take place in
an academic setting, the concepts are similar to those articles about shared governance in a
medical setting.
       The article by Hole (2020) uses shared governance as a structure for policy formation.
This is the only article that used the concept of shared governance as a structural component to
research. This showed the strength of the concept shared governance. The impact of shared
governance has on nursing is powerful. Shared governance allows nurses to make informed
decisions that directly impact their practice (Siller et al., 2016). Siller et al. (2016) examined
shared governance in the emergency department. Their research found that shared governance
promoted the attributes of accountability, teamwork, professional development, autonomy, and
empowerment (Siller et al., 2016). Another article noted the empowerment that shared
governance gives nurses. Gordon (2016) discusses the improvement of nurse satisfaction through
the implementation of shared governance. The overall similarity between these articles
demonstrates the impact and importance of shared governance has on the nursing profession. The
                                                                                                       5
implementation of a shared governance council will intend to have the same impact on the nurses
in the PACU.
           An article by Kyytsönen et al. (2020) suggests that shared governance enhances a nurse’s
leadership skills. This fact is enough to support shared governance councils among staff nurses.
The goal of shared governance is to encourage nurses to lead nurses. This is accomplished
through strengthening relationships and partnerships among various departments (Brennan &
Wendt, 2021). Strengthening relationships among nurses will improve the quality of patient care
through teamwork. Through shared governance, nurses also have the ability to shape their
workplace (Sulit Oriza et al., 2016). Nurses have the impact to change the way they practice
through shared governance. Shared governance gives nurses the voice they need to increase
satisfaction in their profession. Nurses are able to view their care practices through a holistic
viewpoint with shared governance (Bleich, 2018).
           The article by Costley & Clark (2021) describes implementing a shared governance
council in a medical unit. This article provides this project with inspiration and structural ideas.
The first meeting establishes goals (Costley & Clark, 2021). This will allow the council members
to have a frame of reference moving forward in shared governance. Clear communication and a
bulletin board for unit education were other ideas extracted from this article. 
           The overarching concepts related to shared governance in nursing were uncovered
through the literature review. There were some differences among the articles. Some articles
were literature reviews, while others examined hospitals with shared governance and those
without. An article by Hu et al. (2021) surveyed the nurses of two hospitals before and after
implementing shared governance in one of the hospitals. This inspired a survey for this project.
Overall, the articles provided definitions for shared governance and related ideas. The goals of
                                                                                                    6
this project will be accomplished, and shared governance will help the perianesthesia nurses at
the University of Kansas Health System.
                                           Framework
       The building blocks of any project begin with concepts from a nursing theory. Basic
principles are drawn from theories to create a framework. The framework for shared governance
in a Post Anesthesia Care Unit will be drawn from the Social Learning Theory and IOWA
Model. Concepts from each theory will be present within this project and will guide the purpose.
       A critique of each theory is necessary to determine the level of congruence to the purpose
of the project. The Social Learning Theory is a learning theory in which the goal of learning is
self-efficacy (Billings & Halstead, 2020). Learning is accomplished through social interaction
and requires consistent attention, repetition, and reproduction of the content being learned
(Billings & Halstead, 2020). The social aspect of this theory is helpful in a workplace with
nurses. Nurses learn from social settings once their education is over. This learning theory was
selected because the goal of creating a shared governance nursing council is to educate staff
nurses on new workflows and policies. Nurses will be able to implement new practices from
their own input. The social aspect of learning is appealing because of the environment in which
staff nurses work. For this reason, this theory is heavily considered as the framework. The Social
Learning Theory will be the guide.
       The IOWA Model is essential to the implementation of evidence-based practice. One of
the goals of creating a shared governance nursing council will be to implement evidence-based
practice. Through the IOWA Model, the quality of nursing care can improve. In the IOWA
Model, there are five steps. The steps include identifying a problem, appraising it, synthesizing
                                                                                                       7
research, designing a plan, and integrating the plan (Haulesi Chiwaula et al., 2021). This theory
has the potential to be used as a framework for developing a shared governance council.
                                              Methods
       The concept of shared governance will be examined and studied through the lens of
research articles and observation. The goal is to determine if a shared governance council will
increase morale, retention, and a solution to problems among nursing staff. The goal will be
achieved through methods inspired by research and input from the staff nurses.
       A literature review revealed current research on shared governance councils. The
background research helps provide ideas and concepts for the framework of the project. The only
resources required for this project will be the survey, internet, a printer, and a computer. The
participants are nurses in the University of Kansas Health System’s Pre/Post Anesthesia Care
Unit. There are 25 nurses within this department. It is anticipated that the staff nurses will see an
increase in job satisfaction through the development of this project. Shared governance increases
nurse empowerment and satisfaction (Boswell et al., 2017). The increase in job satisfaction will
increase overall morale, retention, and help nurses solve their work-flow related problems. The
staff nurses will be contacted by email to fill out a survey before and after a shared governance
council is created. The council will function for a few months before data is collected again. The
pre and post survey will consist of a short list of questions to gather mostly qualitative data. This
data will provide a basis of information on the current viewpoint of the unit from the staff nurses.
       An online survey generator was used to create and document all of the data throughout the
project. The survey will produce information on the current status of the unit. This will give the
researcher insight into the morale, retention, and satisfaction of the staff nurses. A total of five
                                                                                                       8
staff nurses volunteered to be council members. There will be at least two meetings over the
course of two months before the follow-up survey will be administered.
        The strengths and weaknesses of this project have been considered. The strengths are the
positive influence a shared governance council will have on the unit. The goal is to improve staff
morale, empowerment, and retention. This will be measured through the collection of data
throughout the project. The weaknesses are the lack of control over other staff members
contributing to data collection and ensuring meetings are plausible due to potential schedule
conflicts.
       After analyzing the data collection, it is determined that the level of data will be nominal.
The concepts will be named and monitored but will not reach an absolute number. A simple form
of analysis will be determined after the data is recorded. The data will be compared to the initial
collection to determine changes. The purpose statement is the goal of the project. The survey
questions will be aimed at achieving that goal. There is an agreement with the preceptor
regarding the goals and collection of data. The staff nurses will determine this within the
Pre/Post Anesthesia Care Unit.
                                     Ethical Considerations
        The staff nurses at the University of Kansas Health System’s Pre/Post Anesthesia Care
Unit participated willingly in this research project. Each participant volunteered and was given
the option to stop participating at any time. An IRB application was submitted for this research
before participants were involved.
                                              Results
        The pre survey contained seven questions with the intention of analyzing the unit morale,
satisfaction, and retention of nurses before the implementation of the shared governance practice
                                                                                                      9
council. Of the twenty-five staff nurses, there were six replies. The overall morale of the unit was
rated poorly with 66% identifying it as such. Interestingly enough, 83% of the respondents were
satisfied overall with their job. After the data was analyzed, the council started having meetings.
These meetings revealed workflow related problems that were solved with the help of staff
nurses. It is a goal for staff nurses to feel empowered by making changes to their workflow
related problems. There will be a post implementation survey with a similar amount of questions
to determine if morale and overall satisfaction has been changed. Retention will also be looked at
to determine if any nursing staff has left within this time.
                                             Discussion
       The overall implication of implementing a shared governance practice council within the
Pre/Post Anesthesia Care Unit at the University of Kansas Health System. There has been an
overall improvement in nurses being satisfied within their role. The purpose of this project was
to determine if creating a shared governance practice council would improve overall nurse
satisfaction, retention, and unit morale. Through research, shared governance was defined.
Shared governance allows nurses to improve their practice and the quality of patient care (Siller
et al., 2016). This shared governance project brought a lot of strengths into the Pre/Post
Anesthesia Care Unit. The overall strengths of this project was the engagement of staff nurses to
solve their workflow related problems and advocate for their patient care. Some limitations of
this project include only 24% of nurses filled out the pre survey. Another limitation includes the
time constraint and availability of nurses to maintain practice council meetings. It can be implied
that shared governance does in fact increase the satisfaction of nurses by empowering them to
advocate for themselves without the need for leadership to be involved. The IOWA model was
used to create and devise a plan to implement shared governance on this unit. In the IOWA
                                                                                                10
model a problem is identified, discussed, researched, then a plan is created and integrated
(Haulesi Chiwaula et al., 2021). This design model helped create a framework and reference for
assessing the data collected from surveys. The overall design of this project has been beneficial
to the researcher and has allowed for data to be used to assess the morale of the unit.
                                                                                                  11
                                            References
Billings, D., & Halstead, J.A. (2020). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty. (6th ed.). Elsevier
Bleich, M. R. (2018). Shared governance—shared leadership: Opportunities for
       development.  The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 49(9), 394-396.
       https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20180813-03
Bonnel, W., & Smith, K. V. (2021). Proposal writing for clinical nursing and DNP projects 
                   (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company
Boswell, C., Opton, L., & Owen, D. C. (2017). Exploring shared governance for an academic
       nursing setting.  Journal of Nursing Education,  56(4), 197-203.
       http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20170323-02
Brennan, D., & Wendt, L. (2021). Increasing quality and patient outcomes with staff engagement
       and shared governance. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 26(2).
       https://doi.org/10.3912/ojin.vol26no02ppt23
Costley, T., & Clark, D. (2021). Professional governance and staff engagement: A new medical
       unit establishes an engaged nursing workforce. American Nurse Today, 16(1), 41–46.
Gordon, J. N. (2016). Empowering oncology nurses to lead change through a shared governance
       project. Oncology Nursing Forum, 43(6), 688–690. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.ONF.688-
       690
Haulesi Chiwaula, C., Kanjakaya, P., Chipeta, D., Chikatipwa, A., Kalimbuka, T., Zyambo, L.,
       Nkata, S., Jere D. L. (2021). Introducing evidence based practice in nursing care delivery,
       utilizing the Iowa model in intensive care unit at Kamuzu central hospital, Malawi.
       International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, (14).
       https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100272
                                                                                                   12
Hole, A. (2020). Using shared governance and evidence‐based practice to redesign a nursing
       policy and procedure manual. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 170–172.
       https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12407
Hu, X., Xiang, M., Yang, L., Zhuang, Y., Qu, Y., Wu, Q., Zhu, C., & Wang, X. (2021). Nursing
       councils' effectiveness and nurses' perceptions of shared governance in Chinese magnet®
       and non-magnet® hospitals: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Economics, 39(6), 304-
       310.
Kyytsönen, M., Tomietto, M., Huhtakangas, M., & Kanste, O. (2020). Research on hospital-
       based shared governance: A scoping review. International Journal of Health
       Governance, 25(4), 371-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-04-2020-0032
Siller, J., Dolansky, M. A., Clavelle, J. T., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2016). Shared governance and
       work engagement in emergency nurses: JEN. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 42(4), 325-
       330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2016.01.002
Sulit Oriza, N., Winter, V., & Imperial-Perez, F. (2016). Shared governance for a healthy work
       environment in a pediatric cardiothoracic intensive care unit. AACN Advanced Critical
       Care, 27(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016968