CH 6 - Cost Estimating
CH 6 - Cost Estimating
COST ESTIMATING
Cost is a major factor in most decisions regarding construction, and cost estimates are
prepared throughout the planning, design, and construction phases of a construction
project, different types of cost estimating from preliminary to detailed are conducted for
different purposes. All of these estimates are important because they invariably influence
the expenditure of major sums. However, estimates made in the early phases of a project
are particularly important because they affect the most basic decisions about a project. In
most cases, the final cost (or cost projections during construction) has been significantly
higher than the cost estimates prepared and released during initial planning, preliminary
engineering, final design, or even at the start of construction.
There are two distinct tasks in estimating: determining the probable cost and determining
the probable time to build a project. With an increased emphasis on project planning and
There are many types of cost estimates that can be performed on a project, each type
having different levels of accuracy. The estimating process becomes increasingly more
expensive as more detailed and accurate techniques are applied. Estimating can be
categorized into several classes according to purposes, budget, limitation, time, and
accuracy. Generally, the nature and characteristics of estimating can be summarized as
follow: accuracy improves with the development of the project such that the distribution
of errors narrows from feasibility to settlement; underestimates are more likely than
overestimates and the final cost of a project cannot be established until the settlement of
project accounts.
For example, cost estimates is divided into seven types: 1- Preliminary or rough cost or
approximate estimate is prepared to decide the financial aspect and accompanied by
detailed report, brief specifications, layout plan showing the proposal in hand; and brief
idea of rates for different items; 2- Detailed estimate, is prepared in detail prior to inviting
of tenders; 3- Quantity estimate, is a complete estimate of quantities for all items of work
required to complete a project; 4- Revised estimate is also a detailed estimate and is
prepared afresh, when the original sanctioned detailed estimate exceeds by 5% or more;
5- Annual repair or maintenance prepared in order to keep the structures in proper
condition; 6- Supplementary estimate, when some additions are done in the original
work; and 7- Extension estimate, when some changes and extensions are required to be
made in old work.
There are many types of cost estimates and re-estimates for a project based on the stage
of project development. Estimates are performed throughout the life of a project,
beginning with the first estimate and extending through the various phases of design and
into construction. Initial cost estimates form the basis to which all future estimates are
compared. Future estimates are often expected to agree with (i.e., be equal to or less than)
the initial estimates. However, too often the final project costs exceed the initial
estimates. Estimates are performed throughout the life of a project, beginning with the
first estimate and extending through the various phases of design and into construction.
Traditionally, the different classifications of estimates conclude that there are three main
types of estimates:
1. Conceptual cost estimates.
2. Semi-detailed cost estimates.
Conceptual estimate
The conceptual estimate is also defined as approximate estimate and used to know the
budget for a project. Considerable experience and judgment are required to obtain a
dependable approximate estimate for the cost.
Semi-detailed estimate
Semi-detailed cost estimates are developed while basic design decisions are being made
to verify that the project can be constructed at its intended scope within the owner's
budget. Some aspects of the project may be completely designed. Detailed estimating
methods can be used to estimate the cost of project components that have been designed,
and conceptual estimating methods are used to estimate the cost of those components that
remain to be designed. This means that databases are used to estimate the cost of
components for which the design is not complete, and project data are used to estimate
the cost of components for which the design is complete. Therefore, these estimates are
known as semi-detailed cost estimates.
Detailed estimate
The breakdown of tender price is illustrated in Figure 6.1. The tender price consists of
two components, the construction cost estimate and mark-up (margin). The direct cost is
the combined costs of labor, equipment, material, and subcontractor’s costs. The addition
of site overheads and office overheads to the direct cost produces the construction cost
estimates. The second component of the tender price is the mark-up (margin) which
consists of the profit margin, risk allowance, and financial charge.
The various estimates discussed above are carried out in sequence, the previous cost
estimate being the input to the next one. The estimates are successively refined,
incorporating new information and thus keeping a continuously updated estimate that
becomes the budget, available for control process. As the project progresses, the number
of unknowns and uncertainties decreases, while the level of details and the project
information increases. In this way, the accuracy of the estimate improves as it moves
from conceptual to detailed estimate.
The estimator prepares a material quantity take-off of all materials from the drawings.
The quantity of material multiplied by the unit cost of the materials yields the material
cost. The quantity of work required of equipment is divided by the equipment production
rate and then multiplied by the unit cost of equipment to obtain the total cost of
equipment and similarly, the cost of labor are calculated.
The direct cost of a project includes material, labor, equipment, and subcontractor costs.
Upon the completion of the estimate of direct costs, the estimator must determine the
indirect costs of taxes, bonds, insurance and overhead required to complete the project. A
risk analysis of uncertainties is required to determine an appropriate contingency to be
added to the base estimate to account for the unforeseen work that develops during
construction. Upon calculation of the direct and indirect costs, analysis of risk and
assignment of contingency, a profit is added to the estimate to establish the bid price. The
amount of profit can vary considerably, depending on numerous factors such as the size
and complexity of the project, amount of work in progress by the contractor, accuracy
and completeness of the bid documents, competition for work.
The first recognized characteristic of conceptual estimating, like all other estimating, is
the inexactness in the process. With the absence of data and with shortage of time, there
may be no other way to evaluate designs but to use opinion. Conceptual estimating is a
mixture of art and science; the science of estimating tells the cost of past work. The art is
in visualizing a project and the construction of each detail, selecting comparative costs
from past projects and adjusting them to new conditions.
The second characteristic of conceptual estimating is that its accuracy and validity are
highly related to the level of information provided by the project scope. The availability
of a good, complete scope definition is considered the most crucial factor for conceptual
estimating.
Prior the design of a project, cost estimate could be prepared based on the cost
information based on previously completed projects similar to the proposed project. The
number of units or size of the project is the only available information. Although the
range of costs varies among projects, the estimator can develop unit costs to forecast the
cost of future projects.
The unit cost should be developed from weighting the data that emphasizes the average
value, yet it should account for the extreme maximum and minimum values. In that
regard Eq. (6.1) can be used for weighting cost data from previous projects.
UC = (A + 4B + C) / 6 (6.1)
Where: UC = forecast unit cost
A = minimum unit cost of previous projects
B = average unit cost of previous project
C = maximum unit cost of previous projects
Example 6.1
Use the weighted unit cost to determine the conceptual cost estimate for a proposed
parking that is to contain 135 parked cars. Previous projects data are given in Table
6.2.
Table 6.2: Previous projects cost data
Project No. Cost (LE) No. of cars
1 466,580 150
2 290,304 80
3 525,096 120
4 349,920 90
5 259,290 60
6 657,206 220
7 291,718 70
8 711,414 180
Solution
It is necessary for the estimator to adjust the cost information from previously completed
projects for use in the preparation of a conceptual cost estimate for a proposed project.
There should be adjustment for time, location, and size.
The use of cost information from a previous project to forecast the cost of a proposed
project will not be reliable unless an adjustment is made proportional to the difference in
tine between the two projects. The adjustment should represent the relative inflation or
deflation of costs with respect to time due to factors such as labor rates, material costs,
interest rates, etc.
Measures of changes in items such as location, building costs or tender prices are
performed using index numbers. Index numbers are a means of expressing data relative to
a base year. For example, in the case of a building cost index, a selection of building
Various organizations publish indices that show the economic trends of the construction
industry with respect to time. The estimator can use the change of value of an index
between any two years to adjust past cost records and to forecast future project costs.
Example 6.2
Suppose the indices for building construction projects show these economic trends
(Table 6.4). It is required to use the cost of a LE843,500 project completed last year
to prepare a conceptual estimate for a project proposed for construction 3 years from
now.
Table 6.4: Construction economic trends
Year Index
3 years ago 358
2 years ago 359
1 year ago 367
Current year 378
Solution
The equivalent interest rate can be calculated based on the change in the cost index
during the 3-year period as follow:
(378/358) = (1 + i)3, then i = 1.83%
Accordingly, the cost of the project should be adjusted for time as follows:
Cost = LE843,500 × (1 + 0.0183)4 = LE906,960
Tender price levels vary according to the region of the country where the work is carried
out. Similarly, as stated previously in section 6.5.1, the use of cost information from a
previous project to forecast the cost of a proposed project will not be reliable unless an
adjustment is made proportional that represents the difference in cost between the
locations of the two projects. The adjustment should represent the relative difference in
costs material, equipment and labor of the two locations. Indices that show the relative
difference in construction costs with respect to geographical location is usually published
by many organizations.
Example 6.3
Suppose the indices for different location of construction costs are shown in Table
6.5. Suppose that the construction cost of a project completed at city A is LE387,200,
it is required to prepare a conceptual estimate for a similar project proposed in city D.
Solution
The cost of the proposed project could be adjusted for location as follows:
Cost = LE387,200 × (1.105 / 1.025) = LE417,420
The use of cost information from a previous project to forecast the cost of a future project
will not be reliable unless an adjustment is made that represents the difference in size of
the two projects. In general, the cost of a project is directly proportional to its size. The
The conceptual cost estimate for a proposed project is prepared from cost records of a
project completed at a different time and at a different location with a different size. The
estimator must adjust the previous cost information for the combination of time, location
and size.
Example 6.4
Use the time and location indices presented in Tables 6.4 and 6.5 to prepare the
conceptual cost estimate for a building with 62,700 m2 of floor area. The building is
to be constructed 3 years from now in city B. A similar type of building that cost
LE2,197,540 and contained 38,500 m2 completed 2 years ago in city E. Estimate the
probable cost of the proposed building.
Solution
Proposed cost
= Previous cost × Time adjustment × Location adjustment × Size adjustment
= LE2,179,540 × (1 + 0.0183)5 × (1.17 / 1.24) × (62,700 / 38,500)
= LE3,700,360
Although the total cost of a project will increase with size, the cost per unit may decrease.
For example, the cost of an 1800 m2 house may be LE535/m2 where as the cost of a 2200
m2 house of comparable construction maybe only LE487/m2. This is because certain
items such as furniture, garage, etc., are independent of the size of the project. Size
adjustment for a project is unique to the type of project. The estimator must obtain cost
records from previous projects and develop appropriate adjustments for his/her particular
project.
Solution
The unit costs are calculated as given in Table 6.7.
A plot of these points is shown in Figure 6.2. For the first order relationship, the
general equation for a straight line is: y = ax + b. The equation of the straight line can
be determined as:
y = [(17.9 – 24.75) / (190 – 60)] x + 24.75 = - 0.0526 x + 24.75
where 60 < x < 190, then y = 24.75 – 0.0526 (S – 60)
where S the number if units in the proposed project.
Or by adding a trend line of linear type, thus yields the equation shown in Figure 3.1:
y = - 0.056 x + 27.81
Obtaining the unit cost for 170 units project size = - 0.056 × 170 + 27.81 = LE18.29
As illustrated in the Example 6.5, the adjustment of unit costs based on the size of a
project is unique and can be obtained only from previous cost records. The cost data for
some types of projects could be nonlinear. Accordingly, a second order equation may
better fit the data for some types of projects. The estimator must evaluate his/her own
particular cost records and develop a unit cost-size relationship.
6.6.1 Interpolation
Interpolation is a technique used in the early stages of the design sequence when
information on the proposed project is in short supply. It requires a good deal of skill and
experience and is the process of adding in or deducting from the cost analysis to arrive at
a budget for a new project. Therefore in preparing a budget for a new project assume a
cost analysis has been chosen as the basis for the estimate. However, the cost analysis
will contain items that are not required for the new project and these must be deducted.
For example, in the new project the client wishes to exclude the installation of air
conditioning from the estimate and this will have to be deducted from the budget; but on
the other hand the client wishes to include CCTV throughout and the cost of providing
this must be calculated and added in. It is important, as described later, to adjust costs to
• The unit and square meter methods, generally used for preliminary estimates when firm
information is scarce.
• Approximate quantities and elemental cost planning for later stage estimates.
• Other approaches are often cited, most notably cubic meter and storey enclosure
methods, but the accuracy of these approaches are somewhat dubious and they are
seldom used in practice and are not considered here.
The unit method is a single price rate method based upon the cost per functional unit of
the building, a functional unit being, for example, a hotel bedroom. This method is often
regarded as a way of making a comparison between buildings in order to satisfy the
design team that the costs are reasonable in relation to other buildings of a similar nature.
It is not possible to adjust the single rate price and therefore is very much a ball park
approach. It is suitable for clients who specialize in one type of project; for example,
hotel or supermarket chains, where it can be surprisingly accurate. Other examples where
unit costs may apply are:
• Schools – cost per pupil
• Hospitals – cost per bed space.
Example 6.6
Assume that the current cost for a 120-pupil school constructed of wood frame for a
city is LE1,200,000. We are asked to develop an estimate for a 90-pupil school.
Solution
The first step is to separate the per-pupil cost = LE1,200,000/120 = LE10,000/pupil
Apply the unit cost to the new school = LE10,000/pupil X 90 pupils = LE900,000
Solution
Cost per-bed = LE1,250,000/100 = LE12,500/bed
New hospital cost = LE12,500/bed X 125 bed = LE1,562,500
Example 6.8
For a multistory garage spaced for 500 cars the construction cost was LE3,000,000.
What is the estimate of 450-car garage?
Solution
Cost per-car = LE3,000,000/500 = LE6,000/car
New Garage cost = LE6,000/car X 450 car = LE2,270,000
The superficial method is a single price rate method based on the cost per square meter of
the building. The use of this method should be restricted to the early stages of the design
sequence and is probably the most frequently used method of approximate estimating. Its
major advantage is that most published cost data is expressed in this form. The method is
quick and simple to use though, as in the case of the unit method, it is imperative to use
data from similarly designed projects. Another advantage of the superficial method is that
the unit of measurement is meaningful to both the client and the design team. Although
the area for this method is relatively easy to calculate, it does require skill in assessing the
price rate. The rules for calculating the area are:
- All measurements are taken from the face of external walls. No deduction is made
for internal walls, lift shafts, stairwells, etc. – gross internal floor area.
- Where different parts of the building vary in function, then the areas are
calculated separately.
Example 6.9
Gross floor area for office block shown in Figure 3.3 = 10.0 x 25.0 = 250.0 m2
- 2 x 3.0 x 7.50 = 205.0 m2
Area of 5 floors 205.0 x 5 = 1025.0 m2 x LE1100 /m2 = LE1,127,500.0
Basement 7.00 x 25.0 = 175.0 m2 x LE1300 /m2 = LE227,500.0
Estimate for block LE1,355,000.0
The direct cost if each bid item represents the sum of its material, labor, equipment and
subcontractor costs. The sum of bid items direct costs gives the estimated direct cost of
the contract. The direct cost of a given item can be estimated using the unit rate
estimating, operational estimating.
This type of estimating is used in building work and for civil work items where the nature
of work is repetitive. It is based on the resources required and their output rates for each
category of work. Working drawings and specifications are needed to determine the
quantities of materials, equipment, and labor. Current and accurate costs for these items
(unit prices) are also necessary. Because of the detail involved and the need for accuracy,
unit price estimates require a great deal of time and expense to complete properly. For
this reason, unit price estimating is best suited for construction bidding. It can also be
effective for determining certain detailed costs in conceptual budgets or during design
development.
There are some disadvantages of using the unit-rate method for estimating major works.
It does not demand the examination of the program (schedule) or the method statement or
the risks costs in undertaking the work. Also, the precision and level of detail in pricing
an item can give a false sense of confidence in the resulting estimate. This method does
not need having a construction schedule.
Unit
No Description Units Quantity Total
price
Excavation for foundation, material other than
E1 top soil, rock or artificial hard material m3 15000
maximum depth 5-10 m
The indirect costs comprise both site and head office (general) overheads.
6.8.1 Site overheads
The estimated total jobsite overhead costs will become the baseline budget for jobsite
overhead expenditure control. These items might include:
- Jobsite personnel wages and fringe benefits;
- Jobsite personnel project-related travel expenses;
- Outside contracted engineering support (surveying, materials testing, etc.);
- General use equipment for the benefit of the general contractors and
subcontractors (cranes, hoists);
- Field buildings;
- Site utilities for the job duration;
- Horizontal structures (roads, parking, fences, and gates);
- Temporary environmental controls requirements;
- Winter and summer protection of completed works or works in progress;
- Related camp facilities for remote jobs;
- Jobsite production facilities (concrete batching plants, quarry, various shops);
- Protective aids for workers (gloves, hard hats, etc.) during construction and final
cleanup of the project; and
- Utilities needed for material storage;
- Cost of temporary site utilities.
The company home office expenses cannot be chargeable most of the time to a single
project. General overhead represents contractor fixed expenses. A general contractor’s or
subcontractor’s main office expense consists of many items.
The expense list presented above is not appropriate for all contractors. For smaller
contractors who operate from a truck, the list would contain considerably fewer items and
for a large contractor, the list could fill pages, but the concept is the same. The expenses
should be estimated, and all efforts must be made to stay in the budget and to generate the
planned business volume. In general, main office expense ranges from 2.5 to 10% of
annual construction billings.
Contingency is that amount of money added to an estimate to cover the unforeseen needs
of the project, construction difficulties, or estimating accuracy. Many chief estimators or
contractor executives add a contingency to the estimate to cover one or possibly more of
the following:
- Unpredictable price escalation for materials, labor, and installed equipment for
projects with an estimated duration greater than 12 months;
- Project complexity;
- Incomplete working drawings at the time detail estimate is performed;
- Incomplete design in the fast-track or design-build contracting approach;
- Soft spots in the detail estimate due to possible estimating errors, to balance an
estimate that is biased low;
- Abnormal construction methods and startup requirements;
- Estimator personal concerns regarding project, unusual construction risk, and
difficulties to build;
- Unforeseen safety and environmental requirements;
- To provide a form of insurance that the contractor will stay within bid price.
Most often, if for any reason an accurate estimate is not made (95 to 100% accuracy), an
estimator never knows how much money to allow for these “forgotten” items. Many
times, added contingencies are an excuse for using poor estimating practices such as not
enough time, subcontractors not reporting, no time to visit the job site, and so on.
Contingency for these reasons is difficult to sell to management and can hurt the
credibility of the estimating team. On the other hand, compounding building projects’
bidding complexity justifies the need to add contingency as part of the markup. This
construction risk compensation is added to the final direct and jobsite overhead cost. The
magnitude depends on the type of contract agreement, type of construction, and certainly
project location.
Contingency is not potential profit. It includes risk and uncertainty but explicitly excludes
changes in the project scope (change orders). The contingency should absolutely not be
The last item to be included in the bid and representing contractor’s return on investment
is the profit. The magnitude of desired profit must be decided by the owner for each
individual bid, depending on local market conditions, competition, and the contractors’
need for new work. In the construction industry, markup is defined as “the amount added
to the estimated direct cost and estimated job into overhead cost” to recover the firm’s
main office allocated overhead (general overhead) and desired profit. The less profit
added to a bid, the greater the chance is of being the successful bidder.
The total price of a tender comprises the cost and the markup. The cost includes direct
and indirect costs. The markup, on the other hand, includes profit margin, financial
charges (cost of borrowing), and a risk allowance margin (Figure 6.1).
Estimating a single percentage markup to be added to the total cost. It is assumed that this
percentage will cover all the components of markup as shown in Figure 6.1; and Detailed
analysis of the risky components in the project and their impact on the project in terms of
increased time and cost. Also, cash flow analysis to estimate the financial charge and
estimating a reasonable profit margin. Calculations of the financial charges (cost of
borrowing) were, also, presented previously in this chapter based on the cash flow
analysis of the contract.
Having all contract costs (direct and indirect), and markup components (profit margin,
risk allowance and financial charge), it is time to finalize the bid price. While, the direct
cost is associated directly to the contract activities, indirect cost and markup are not
associated with specific activities but with the whole contract. Accordingly, pricing
policy is the method by which the indirect costs and markup will be distributed among
the items of the bill of quantities.
In this method, the indirect cost and the markup will be distributed among different items
based on their direct cost; i.e., the more the direct cost of an item, the more its share from
indirect cost and markup. The resulting bid price is called a balance d bid.
The share of specific item =Direct cost of this item x (total indirect cost + markup)
Total contract direct cost
Example 6.11
Assume that the direct cost for an item (a) is LE 400,000 and that item is included
in a contract whose price is LE 3,500,000 and its total direct cost is LE 2,800,000.
Calculate the price for item (a) considering a balanced bid.
The contract price is said to be unbalanced if the contractor raises the prices on certain
bid items (usually the early items on the bill of quantities) and decreases the prices on
other items so that the tender price remains the same. This process is also called the
loading of rates. The contractor usually loads the prices of the first items to ensure more
cash at the beginning of the contract and to reduce the negative cash flow and
accordingly reduces borrowing of money.
Loading of rates may be risky to both the contractor and the owner. If the contractor
raised the price for an item and the quantity of this item increased than that was estimated
in the bill of quantities then, this situation is more risky to the owner as it will cost the
owner more money. On the other hand, if the contractor reduced the price of a specific
item and the quantity of that item increased, thus situation will be more risky to the
contractor. So, it is better to follow a balanced way of distributing the indirect costs and
markup among contract items.
Example 6.12
Consider a small contract comprises of five sequential activities of equal duration.
The quantity of work in each activity, the direct cost rate, and total cost rate for
balanced and unbalanced bid are given in Table 6.8. Determine the effect of
Solution
- Contract total direct cost = 100 (4 + 8 + 16 + 16 + 8) = 5200
- Contract price = 6500
- Contract markup and profit = 6500 – 5200 = 1300 = 25% of direct cost
- Table 6.9 shows the effect of tender price if the quantity of activity “B” increased
by 50%.
- The price of the unbalanced bid (7200) is greater than that of the balanced bid
(7000) which means more profit to the contractor and more risk to the owner.
- Table 6.10 shows the effect of tender price if the quantity of activity “C”
increased by 50%.
6.10 Exercises
1. Use the time and location indices shown below to estimate the cost of a building
that contains 32500 m2 of floor area. The building is to be constructed 2 years
from now in City A. The cost of a similar type of building that contained 48300
m2 was completed last year in City C for a cost of LE3,308,500.
2. Find the weighted unit cost per square meter for the project data shown and
determine the cost of a 2700-m2 project.
3. Determine the relationship between unit cost and size for the project data shown
in Problem 2 to estimate the cost of a 2200-m2 project.
5. Assume that the current cost for a 120-pupil school constructed of wood frame for
a city is LE1,200,000. We are asked to develop an estimate for a 90-pupil school
to be constructed this year in City A. The 120-pupil school was constructed in
2008 in City E. the inflation rate was assumed to be 2.3% annually.
6. A bill of quantity of a project includes 500m2 of masonry work. The work will be
done by one crew with a production rate of 50 m2/day and consists of:
Vendor price of 1000 bricks = LE160. Each 55 bricks are estimated to make one
square meter of masonry. Each one cubic meter of mortar is used to join brick
area of 50 m2 and consists of:
As a contractor, it is required to estimate the item price and the unit price. Assume
all material waste as 20% and assume overheads and markup as 20% of total cost.