Briefly Summarize The Article and Its Findings. Summary of The Article

Briefly summarize the article and its findings.
Summary of the article
The article is about improving depression screening. This project of quality improvement
was conducted to expand the adequacy of screening for depression.
Methods
To evaluate the population health impact of the intervention tools used, charts, registry
data and surveys were analyzed.
Results
There was no populace wellbeing the board framework for clients evaluating positive for
misery. Also, in only three PDSA cycles, 15.5% of clients accomplished total abatement of their
downturn manifestations by consenting to prove based, proper consideration. In spite of the fact
that it was outside the extent of this undertaking to quantify the viability of sadness treatment,
this addresses a reassuring pattern and emphatically supports the worth of normalized screening
and follow-up as antecedents of successful treatment. Cooperation assessment device scores
additionally gave some knowledge into accidental venture results. Scores diminished with loss of
the consideration facilitator yet were recuperating and improving as the task found some
conclusion (Schaeffer & Jolles, 2019).
Discussion
The project exhibits how a local area health framework can consolidate the supported
quality proportion of sadness screening and follow-up. All of the initial objectives for normalized
screening, patient commitment, follow-up and group commitment were completely met.
Qualities of this venture incorporated a powerful cycle for group commitment, which upheld and
drove the screening system. For a multicultural local area, partner input affected interaction
changes to make screening and follow-up care for sadness fitting. This task can fill in as a model
for care coordination and for different practices keen on working on right consideration for
wretchedness. Given the high number of clients with risk factors identified in the literature and
the impact of standardized screening on timely identification, the prevalence of screen-positive
clients was not surprising. Studies recommend that common decision making for despondency is
best when partner input and social settings are thought of (Schaeffer & Jolles, 2019).
Conclusion
The task showed the attainability of utilizing quick cycle improvement to further develop
melancholy screening and follow-up inside a multicultural local area wellbeing focus. This
venture shed light on the high rate of discouragement in a different local area with a high level of
outsiders and exiles. This project additionally focused on a constant condition with long-standing
ramifications for individual and local area wellbeing that again and again goes unidentified and
subsequently ignored (Schaeffer & Jolles, 2019).
Critique and review the writing style of the article. Specifically, consider the following
aspects:
Tone or the voice of the article
The tone of the article is assertive because it the article is straightforward. It explains the how
screening for depression can be improved, the methods to be used and explains the benefits of
improving screening for depression as it improves the general health of a community and
population at large.
Techniques the author (s) used in their writing
The authors used informative writing style because the research was about improving screening
for depression. It aimed to inform the readers and other researchers of how improving screening
for depression can be done. Also, the authors used expository writing technique because the
article explains and describes screening for depression (Ferrari, 2015).
Is the information clear?
The information by the authors is clear. The author’s writing style creates clarity because it
explains in detail how the screening of depression was done, the methods used for conducting the
screening, the results of the research and also a detailed discussion of what the results and
fidndings of the research meant.
Does the article provide adequate justification and convey the importance of the problem
they are focusing on? What elements of the introduction/background support this?
Yes, there is adequate justification and the importance of what the authors are focusing on is
conveyed. The elements that support this are that in a multicultural health center, the percentage
of clients screened and followed up for depression was only 9.1% and this shows the importance
of improving the screening for depression and improve the efficacy of screening.
Does the article provide a clear overview of what intervention(s) were implemented?
Yes, there is a clear overview of the interventions implemented in the article. For example, the
article clearly shows the different methods used to conduct the study of screening for depression,
and how effective the methods were.

Does the article provide appropriate conclusions? Does it relate it back to the original
introduction?
Yes, the conclusions provided by the article are appropriate. Also, the conclusions relate back to
the original introduction because it explains how the efficacy of screening depression was
increased.
References
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235.
https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329
Schaeffer, A. M., & Jolles, D. (2019). Not Missing the Opportunity: Improving Depression
Screening and Follow-Up in a Multicultural Community. The Joint Commission Journal
on Quality and Patient Safety, 45(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.06.002

Briefly Summarize The Article and Its Findings. Summary of The Article

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Briefly Summarize The Article and Its Findings. Summary of The Article

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Briefly Summarize The Article and Its Findings. Summary of The Article

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Briefly summarize the article and its findings.

Summary of the article

was conducted to expand the adequacy of screening for depression.

data and surveys were analyzed.

and follow-up as antecedents of successful treatment. Cooperation assessment device scores

conclusion (Schaeffer & Jolles, 2019).

the impact of standardized screening on timely identification, the prevalence of screen-positive

subsequently ignored (Schaeffer & Jolles, 2019).

Tone or the voice of the article

article explains and describes screening for depression (Ferrari, 2015).

Is the information clear?

fidndings of the research meant.

and how effective the methods were.

Screening and Follow-Up in a Multicultural Community. The Joint Commission Journal

on Quality and Patient Safety, 45(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.06.002

You might also like