ONLINE ASSESSMENT OF ACQUIRED

COMPETENCE
CLASS INFORMATION
TYPE OF ASSESSMENT
LEARNING TASK DATE OF ENCODING 2/23/2022 14:40:00
ETHICS
COURSE CODE GE2 SCHOOL YEAR 2021-2022 COURSE TITLE SEMESTER SECOND

SEMESTER SECTION Multiple Section GRADING PERIOD MIDTERM FACULTY RIVERA, CLARITA AREA

GENERAL EDUCATION this is submitted using the email address: clarita.rivera@letran.edu.ph

ONLINE ASSESSMENT OF ACQUIRED

COMPETENCE
LEARNING TASK
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
TOPIC Ethical Dimensions of Human Existence, Utilitarianism, Natural Law.

PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT MAJOR EXAMINATION

6
TOTAL POINTS 50OVER-ALL DIFFICULTY OF THE TASK (1-10)

OBJECTIVES OF THE ASSESSMENT careful ethical thinking.

-To be able to take the getting started in the meaning of ethics -To subsume all learnings in the subject to embed sets of values
leading the students to the analysis of human experience . for the students to examine. -To be articulated enough as
-To entangle the recognition of ethics as a significant dimension preparation for their chosen field or career.
of human existence and to explore how to engage oneself in

RATIONALE : This middle of the term examination provides the framework for the development of your intellectual
competencies and civic capacities, your ability to comprehend the complexities of the social
and natural
realities, as well as your ability to think through the ethical and social implications of a given course of
 actions. This is in consistency with CHED Memo Order No, 20 of 2013.

ONLINE ASSESSMENT OF ACQUIRED

COMPETENCE
INSTRUCTIONS/QUESTIONS :

-To be able to take the getting started in the meaning of ethics leading the students to the analysis of
human experience .
-To entangle the recognition of ethics as a significant dimension of human existence and to explore how
to engage oneself in careful ethical thinking.
-To subsume all learnings in the subject to embed sets of values for the students to examine.
-To be articulated enough as preparation for their chosen field or career.

Directions: Answer each letter item as precise as you are expected to.
Make proper citations of your resources (in whatever channels).
Present your answers in a proper logical form with certainty avoiding opinions.
Present answers in not more than two (2) paragraphs and in not more than seven
(7) statements.
Each letter item is assessed according to rubrics for essay having 18 points.
Your total points for the five (5) numbers amounts to 90/90.

CASE ANALYSIS SITUATIONS:

A)In more than two years of pandemic experience, we have been experiencing failure and
mismanagement in policy making on how the IATF takes its course specifically on pandemic
response.
What if the IATF is using the utilitarian ethics as their guiding principles in policy making that directly
highlights the famous moral arbiter “the greatest amount of good for the greatest number”.
Q: Let us assume that you belong in the circle of policy-making within the IATF and you have given a task
to (re) formulate that is grounded in the said utilitarian model. What would it be? Categorize our
formulated policies.

B) St. Thomas defines law as the ordinance for the common good made by those entrusted with the
community and promulgate. It.
Q: Spell out this statement: ‘Right is inherent to human beings and law is the
instrument and measure to protect it””.

C)Your attempt to help an elderly man across the street .You stumble as you go, thereby, he is knocked
into the path of a car and is hurt.
Q: Is your act considered ethical. Make an eloquent presentation.

D) Moral values are being practiced one way or another in different communities.
Q: With this, once an act is repeatedly done, does this make the action morally right?

E) We have all struggled, at one time or another with the question – why should I bother being good? why
should I care for others, beyond my own self. You may contemplate on your own experiences. You may
 even say, what I believe must be true if I feel strongly about it?
Corruption in forms of nepotism and cronyism is a pernicious social and political problems in our society.
Since we are accustomed to it, we even justify it, saying it is only right for a person in power to protect
those around him.
Q: Will this be regarded as ethical egoism (ethics of one’s ego) with the view of
understanding the self in relation to ethics? Articulate on this.

ONLINE ASSESSMENT OF ACQUIRED

COMPETENCE
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS N/A
LINK FOR THE RUBRICS
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18hqZzr9_uO0m5JGsFhNUHUN6mM7TZTYf/edit?

usp=sharing&ouid=117542639010093264819&rtpof=true&sd=true

DEADLINES COMPETENCIES

DATE OF POSTING IN THE GOOGLE CLASSROOM: March 7 [Mon], 2022 Ensure depth and breadth in related theories

and disciplinal content. /

1ST DEADLINE
Highest grades is 100% (on or before the submission) March 14 [Mon], 2022 Develop and acquire the technical and non-technical

skills. /

2ND DEADLINE
Highest grade is 90% (within 1 week after the 1st deadline) March 15 [Tue], 2022 Apply knowledge and skills in real-life situations. /
3RD DEADLINE
Highest grade is 85% (within 2nd week after the 1st deadline) March 21 [Mon], 2022 Subscribe to professional ethical standards. /
4TH DEADLINE
Highest grade is 80% (within 3rd week after the 1st deadline) March 28 [Mon], 2022 Produce scholarly work. - 5TH DEADLINE

Highest grade is 75% (beyond 3rd week after the 1st deadline) April 4 [Mon], 2022 Showcase capabilities through creative outputs. -

Exercise social responsibility. /

REFERENCE NO: 2021-500