Graph Theory With Applications - Included
Graph Theory With Applications - Included
Graph Theory With Applications - Included
org/wiki/Graph_theory
Graph theory
In mathematics, graph theory is the study of graphs, which
are mathematical structures used to model pairwise relations
between objects. A graph in this context is made up of vertices
(also called nodes or points) which are connected by edges
(also called links or lines). A distinction is made between
undirected graphs, where edges link two vertices
symmetrically, and directed graphs, where edges link two
vertices asymmetrically. Graphs are one of the principal
objects of study in discrete mathematics. A drawing of a graph.
Contents
Definitions
Graph
Directed graph
Applications
Computer science
Linguistics
Physics and chemistry
Social sciences
Biology
Mathematics
Other topics
History
Graph drawing
Graph-theoretic data structures
Problems
Enumeration
Subgraphs, induced subgraphs, and minors
Graph coloring
Subsumption and unification
Route problems
Network flow
Visibility problems
Covering problems
Decomposition problems
Graph classes
See also
Related topics
Algorithms
Subareas
Related areas of mathematics
Generalizations
Prominent graph theorists
Notes
References
External links
Online textbooks
Definitions
Definitions in graph theory vary. The following are some of the more basic ways of defining graphs
and related mathematical structures.
Graph
In one more general sense of the term allowing multiple edges,[3][4] a graph is an ordered triple
comprising:
To avoid ambiguity, this type of object may be called precisely an undirected multigraph.
A loop is an edge that joins a vertex to itself. Graphs as defined in the two definitions above cannot
have loops, because a loop joining a vertex to itself is the edge (for an undirected simple graph)
or is incident on (for an undirected multigraph) which is not in
. So to allow loops the definitions must be expanded. For
and are usually taken to be finite, and many of the well-known results are not true (or are
rather different) for infinite graphs because many of the arguments fail in the infinite case.
Moreover, is often assumed to be non-empty, but is allowed to be the empty set. The order of
a graph is , its number of vertices. The size of a graph is , its number of edges. The degree
or valency of a vertex is the number of edges that are incident to it, where a loop is counted twice.
The degree of a graph is the maximum of the degrees of its vertices.
In an undirected simple graph of order n, the maximum degree of each vertex is n − 1 and the
maximum size of the graph is n(n − 1)/2.
The edges of an undirected simple graph permitting loops induce a symmetric homogeneous
relation ~ on the vertices of that is called the adjacency relation of . Specifically, for each
edge , its endpoints and are said to be adjacent to one another, which is denoted ~ .
Directed graph
In one more general sense of the term allowing multiple edges,[5] a directed graph is an ordered
triple comprising:
To avoid ambiguity, this type of object may be called precisely a directed multigraph.
A loop is an edge that joins a vertex to itself. Directed graphs as defined in the two definitions
above cannot have loops, because a loop joining a vertex to itself is the edge (for a directed
simple graph) or is incident on (for a directed multigraph) which is not in
. So to allow loops the definitions must be expanded. For
directed simple graphs, the definition of should be modified to . For
directed multigraphs, the definition of should be modified to .
To avoid ambiguity, these types of objects may be called precisely a directed simple graph
permitting loops and a directed multigraph permitting loops (or a quiver) respectively.
The edges of a directed simple graph permitting loops is a homogeneous relation ~ on the
vertices of that is called the adjacency relation of . Specifically, for each edge , its
endpoints and are said to be adjacent to one another, which is denoted ~ .
Applications
Graphs can be used to model many types of relations and
processes in physical, biological,[7][8] social and information
systems.[9] Many practical problems can be represented by
graphs. Emphasizing their application to real-world systems,
the term network is sometimes defined to mean a graph in
which attributes (e.g. names) are associated with the vertices
and edges, and the subject that expresses and understands the
real-world systems as a network is called network science.
Computer science
The network graph formed by
In computer science, graphs are used to represent networks of Wikipedia editors (edges)
communication, data organization, computational devices, the contributing to different Wikipedia
flow of computation, etc. For instance, the link structure of a language versions (vertices) during
website can be represented by a directed graph, in which the one month in summer 2013.[6]
vertices represent web pages and directed edges represent
links from one page to another. A similar approach can be
taken to problems in social media,[10] travel, biology, computer chip design, mapping the
progression of neuro-degenerative diseases,[11][12] and many other fields. The development of
algorithms to handle graphs is therefore of major interest in computer science. The transformation
of graphs is often formalized and represented by graph rewrite systems. Complementary to graph
transformation systems focusing on rule-based in-memory manipulation of graphs are graph
databases geared towards transaction-safe, persistent storing and querying of graph-structured
data.
Linguistics
Graph-theoretic methods, in various forms, have proven particularly useful in linguistics, since
natural language often lends itself well to discrete structure. Traditionally, syntax and
compositional semantics follow tree-based structures, whose expressive power lies in the principle
of compositionality, modeled in a hierarchical graph. More contemporary approaches such as
head-driven phrase structure grammar model the syntax of natural language using typed feature
structures, which are directed acyclic graphs. Within lexical semantics, especially as applied to
computers, modeling word meaning is easier when a given word is understood in terms of related
words; semantic networks are therefore important in computational linguistics. Still, other
methods in phonology (e.g. optimality theory, which uses lattice graphs) and morphology (e.g.
finite-state morphology, using finite-state transducers) are common in the analysis of language as
a graph. Indeed, the usefulness of this area of mathematics to linguistics has borne organizations
such as TextGraphs (http://www.textgraphs.org/), as well as various 'Net' projects, such as
WordNet, VerbNet, and others.
Graph theory is also used to study molecules in chemistry and physics. In condensed matter
physics, the three-dimensional structure of complicated simulated atomic structures can be
studied quantitatively by gathering statistics on graph-theoretic properties related to the topology
of the atoms. Also, "the Feynman graphs and rules of calculation summarize quantum field theory
in a form in close contact with the experimental numbers one wants to understand."[13] In
chemistry a graph makes a natural model for a molecule, where vertices represent atoms and edges
bonds. This approach is especially used in computer processing of molecular structures, ranging
from chemical editors to database searching. In statistical physics, graphs can represent local
connections between interacting parts of a system, as well as the dynamics of a physical process on
such systems. Similarly, in computational neuroscience graphs can be used to represent functional
connections between brain areas that interact to give rise to various cognitive processes, where the
vertices represent different areas of the brain and the edges represent the connections between
those areas. Graph theory plays an important role in electrical modeling of electrical networks,
here, weights are associated with resistance of the wire segments to obtain electrical properties of
network structures.[14] Graphs are also used to represent the micro-scale channels of porous
media, in which the vertices represent the pores and the edges represent the smaller channels
connecting the pores. Chemical graph theory uses the molecular graph as a means to model
molecules. Graphs and networks are excellent models to study and understand phase transitions
and critical phenomena. Removal of nodes or edges lead to a critical transition where the network
breaks into small clusters which is studied as a phase transition. This breakdown is studied via
percolation theory.[15] [16]
Social sciences
disease, parasites or how changes to the movement can affect other species.
Graphs are also commonly used in molecular biology and genomics to model and analyse datasets
with complex relationships. For example, graph-based methods are often used to 'cluster' cells
together into cell-types in single-cell transcriptome analysis. Another use is to model genes or
proteins in a pathway and study the relationships between them, such as metabolic pathways and
gene regulatory networks.[19] Evolutionary trees, ecological networks, and hierarchical clustering
of gene expression patterns are also represented as graph structures. Graph-based methods are
pervasive that researchers in some fields of biology and these will only become far more
widespread as technology develops to leverage this kind of high-throughout multidimensional
data.
Graph theory is also used in connectomics;[20] nervous systems can be seen as a graph, where the
nodes are neurons and the edges are the connections between them.
Mathematics
In mathematics, graphs are useful in geometry and certain parts of topology such as knot theory.
Algebraic graph theory has close links with group theory. Algebraic graph theory has been applied
to many areas including dynamic systems and complexity.
Other topics
A graph structure can be extended by assigning a weight to each edge of the graph. Graphs with
weights, or weighted graphs, are used to represent structures in which pairwise connections have
some numerical values. For example, if a graph represents a road network, the weights could
represent the length of each road. There may be several weights associated with each edge,
including distance (as in the previous example), travel time, or monetary cost. Such weighted
graphs are commonly used to program GPS's, and travel-planning search engines that compare
flight times and costs.
History
The paper written by Leonhard Euler on the Seven Bridges of
Königsberg and published in 1736 is regarded as the first paper
in the history of graph theory.[21] This paper, as well as the one
written by Vandermonde on the knight problem, carried on
with the analysis situs initiated by Leibniz. Euler's formula
relating the number of edges, vertices, and faces of a convex
polyhedron was studied and generalized by Cauchy[22] and
L'Huilier,[23] and represents the beginning of the branch of
mathematics known as topology.
The Königsberg Bridge problem
More than one century after Euler's paper on the bridges of
Königsberg and while Listing was introducing the concept of
topology, Cayley was led by an interest in particular analytical forms arising from differential
calculus to study a particular class of graphs, the trees.[24] This study had many implications for
theoretical chemistry. The techniques he used mainly concern the enumeration of graphs with
particular properties. Enumerative graph theory then arose from the results of Cayley and the
fundamental results published by Pólya between 1935 and 1937. These were generalized by De
Bruijn in 1959. Cayley linked his results on trees with contemporary studies of chemical
composition.[25] The fusion of ideas from mathematics with those from chemistry began what has
become part of the standard terminology of graph theory.
In particular, the term "graph" was introduced by Sylvester in a paper published in 1878 in Nature,
where he draws an analogy between "quantic invariants" and "co-variants" of algebra and
molecular diagrams:[26]
"[…] Every invariant and co-variant thus becomes expressible by a graph precisely identical
with a Kekuléan diagram or chemicograph. […] I give a rule for the geometrical multiplication
of graphs, i.e. for constructing a graph to the product of in- or co-variants whose separate
graphs are given. […]" (italics as in the original).
The first textbook on graph theory was written by Dénes Kőnig, and published in 1936.[27] Another
book by Frank Harary, published in 1969, was "considered the world over to be the definitive
textbook on the subject",[28] and enabled mathematicians, chemists, electrical engineers and social
scientists to talk to each other. Harary donated all of the royalties to fund the Pólya Prize.[29]
One of the most famous and stimulating problems in graph theory is the four color problem: "Is it
true that any map drawn in the plane may have its regions colored with four colors, in such a way
that any two regions having a common border have different colors?" This problem was first posed
by Francis Guthrie in 1852 and its first written record is in a letter of De Morgan addressed to
Hamilton the same year. Many incorrect proofs have been proposed, including those by Cayley,
Kempe, and others. The study and the generalization of this problem by Tait, Heawood, Ramsey
and Hadwiger led to the study of the colorings of the graphs embedded on surfaces with arbitrary
genus. Tait's reformulation generated a new class of problems, the factorization problems,
particularly studied by Petersen and Kőnig. The works of Ramsey on colorations and more
specially the results obtained by Turán in 1941 was at the origin of another branch of graph theory,
extremal graph theory.
The four color problem remained unsolved for more than a century. In 1969 Heinrich Heesch
published a method for solving the problem using computers.[30] A computer-aided proof
produced in 1976 by Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken makes fundamental use of the notion of
"discharging" developed by Heesch.[31][32] The proof involved checking the properties of 1,936
configurations by computer, and was not fully accepted at the time due to its complexity. A simpler
proof considering only 633 configurations was given twenty years later by Robertson, Seymour,
Sanders and Thomas.[33]
The autonomous development of topology from 1860 and 1930 fertilized graph theory back
through the works of Jordan, Kuratowski and Whitney. Another important factor of common
development of graph theory and topology came from the use of the techniques of modern algebra.
The first example of such a use comes from the work of the physicist Gustav Kirchhoff, who
published in 1845 his Kirchhoff's circuit laws for calculating the voltage and current in electric
circuits.
The introduction of probabilistic methods in graph theory, especially in the study of Erdős and
Rényi of the asymptotic probability of graph connectivity, gave rise to yet another branch, known
as random graph theory, which has been a fruitful source of graph-theoretic results.
Graph drawing
Graphs are represented visually by drawing a point or circle for every vertex, and drawing a line
between two vertices if they are connected by an edge. If the graph is directed, the direction is
indicated by drawing an arrow.
A graph drawing should not be confused with the graph itself (the abstract, non-visual structure)
as there are several ways to structure the graph drawing. All that matters is which vertices are
connected to which others by how many edges and not the exact layout. In practice, it is often
difficult to decide if two drawings represent the same graph. Depending on the problem domain
some layouts may be better suited and easier to understand than others.
The pioneering work of W. T. Tutte was very influential on the subject of graph drawing. Among
other achievements, he introduced the use of linear algebraic methods to obtain graph drawings.
Graph drawing also can be said to encompass problems that deal with the crossing number and its
various generalizations. The crossing number of a graph is the minimum number of intersections
between edges that a drawing of the graph in the plane must contain. For a planar graph, the
crossing number is zero by definition.
List structures include the edge list, an array of pairs of vertices, and the adjacency list, which
separately lists the neighbors of each vertex: Much like the edge list, each vertex has a list of which
vertices it is adjacent to.
Matrix structures include the incidence matrix, a matrix of 0's and 1's whose rows represent
vertices and whose columns represent edges, and the adjacency matrix, in which both the rows and
columns are indexed by vertices. In both cases a 1 indicates two adjacent objects and a 0 indicates
two non-adjacent objects. The degree matrix indicates the degree of vertices. The Laplacian matrix
is a modified form of the adjacency matrix that incorporates information about the degrees of the
vertices, and is useful in some calculations such as Kirchhoff's theorem on the number of spanning
trees of a graph. The distance matrix, like the adjacency matrix, has both its rows and columns
indexed by vertices, but rather than containing a 0 or a 1 in each cell it contains the length of a
shortest path between two vertices.
Problems
Enumeration
There is a large literature on graphical enumeration: the problem of counting graphs meeting
specified conditions. Some of this work is found in Harary and Palmer (1973).
A common problem, called the subgraph isomorphism problem, is finding a fixed graph as a
subgraph in a given graph. One reason to be interested in such a question is that many graph
properties are hereditary for subgraphs, which means that a graph has the property if and only if
all subgraphs have it too. Unfortunately, finding maximal subgraphs of a certain kind is often an
NP-complete problem. For example:
Finding the largest complete subgraph is called the clique problem (NP-complete).
One special case of subgraph isomorphism is the graph isomorphism problem. It asks whether two
graphs are isomorphic. It is not known whether this problem is NP-complete, nor whether it can be
solved in polynomial time.
A similar problem is finding induced subgraphs in a given graph. Again, some important graph
properties are hereditary with respect to induced subgraphs, which means that a graph has a
property if and only if all induced subgraphs also have it. Finding maximal induced subgraphs of a
certain kind is also often NP-complete. For example:
Finding the largest edgeless induced subgraph or independent set is called the independent
set problem (NP-complete).
Still another such problem, the minor containment problem, is to find a fixed graph as a minor of a
given graph. A minor or subcontraction of a graph is any graph obtained by taking a subgraph and
contracting some (or no) edges. Many graph properties are hereditary for minors, which means
that a graph has a property if and only if all minors have it too. For example, Wagner's Theorem
states:
A graph is planar if it contains as a minor neither the complete bipartite graph K3,3 (see the
Three-cottage problem) nor the complete graph K5.
A similar problem, the subdivision containment problem, is to find a fixed graph as a subdivision
of a given graph. A subdivision or homeomorphism of a graph is any graph obtained by
subdividing some (or no) edges. Subdivision containment is related to graph properties such as
planarity. For example, Kuratowski's Theorem states:
A graph is planar if it contains as a subdivision neither the complete bipartite graph K3,3 nor the
complete graph K5.
Every 5-vertex-connected graph that is not planar contains a subdivision of the 5-vertex
complete graph K5.
Another class of problems has to do with the extent to which various species and generalizations of
graphs are determined by their point-deleted subgraphs. For example:
Graph coloring
Many problems and theorems in graph theory have to do with various ways of coloring graphs.
Typically, one is interested in coloring a graph so that no two adjacent vertices have the same color,
or with other similar restrictions. One may also consider coloring edges (possibly so that no two
coincident edges are the same color), or other variations. Among the famous results and
conjectures concerning graph coloring are the following:
Four-color theorem
Strong perfect graph theorem
Erdős–Faber–Lovász conjecture (unsolved)
Total coloring conjecture, also called Behzad's conjecture (unsolved)
List coloring conjecture (unsolved)
Hadwiger conjecture (graph theory) (unsolved)
Constraint modeling theories concern families of directed graphs related by a partial order. In
these applications, graphs are ordered by specificity, meaning that more constrained graphs
—which are more specific and thus contain a greater amount of information—are subsumed by
those that are more general. Operations between graphs include evaluating the direction of a
subsumption relationship between two graphs, if any, and computing graph unification. The
unification of two argument graphs is defined as the most general graph (or the computation
thereof) that is consistent with (i.e. contains all of the information in) the inputs, if such a graph
exists; efficient unification algorithms are known.
For constraint frameworks which are strictly compositional, graph unification is the sufficient
satisfiability and combination function. Well-known applications include automatic theorem
proving and modeling the elaboration of linguistic structure.
Route problems
Hamiltonian path problem
Minimum spanning tree
Route inspection problem (also called the "Chinese postman problem")
Seven bridges of Königsberg
Shortest path problem
Steiner tree
Three-cottage problem
Traveling salesman problem (NP-hard)
Network flow
There are numerous problems arising especially from applications that have to do with various
notions of flows in networks, for example:
Visibility problems
Museum guard problem
Covering problems
Covering problems in graphs may refer to various set cover problems on subsets of
vertices/subgraphs.
Dominating set problem is the special case of set cover problem where sets are the closed
neighborhoods.
Vertex cover problem is the special case of set cover problem where sets to cover are every
edges.
The original set cover problem, also called hitting set, can be described as a vertex cover in a
hypergraph.
Decomposition problems
Decomposition, defined as partitioning the edge set of a graph (with as many vertices as necessary
accompanying the edges of each part of the partition), has a wide variety of questions. Often, the
problem is to decompose a graph into subgraphs isomorphic to a fixed graph; for instance,
decomposing a complete graph into Hamiltonian cycles. Other problems specify a family of graphs
into which a given graph should be decomposed, for instance, a family of cycles, or decomposing a
complete graph Kn into n − 1 specified trees having, respectively, 1, 2, 3, ..., n − 1 edges.
Graph classes
Many problems involve characterizing the members of various classes of graphs. Some examples of
such questions are below:
See also
Gallery of named graphs Citation graph
Glossary of graph theory Conceptual graph
List of graph theory topics Data structure
List of unsolved problems in graph theory Disjoint-set data structure
Publications in graph theory Dual-phase evolution
Entitative graph
Existential graph
Related topics
Graph algebra
Algebraic graph theory
Notes
1. Bender & Williamson 2010, p. 148.
2. See, for instance, Iyanaga and Kawada, 69 J, p. 234 or Biggs, p. 4.
3. Bender & Williamson 2010, p. 149.
4. See, for instance, Graham et al., p. 5.
5. Bender & Williamson 2010, p. 161.
6. Hale, Scott A. (2013). "Multilinguals and Wikipedia Editing". Proceedings of the 2014 ACM
Conference on Web Science - WebSci '14: 99–108. arXiv:1312.0976 (https://arxiv.org/abs/131
2.0976). Bibcode:2013arXiv1312.0976H (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013arXiv1312.09
76H). doi:10.1145/2615569.2615684 (https://doi.org/10.1145%2F2615569.2615684).
ISBN 9781450326223. S2CID 14027025 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14027025).
7. Mashaghi, A.; et al. (2004). "Investigation of a protein complex network". European Physical
Journal B. 41 (1): 113–121. arXiv:cond-mat/0304207 (https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0304207).
Bibcode:2004EPJB...41..113M (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004EPJB...41..113M).
doi:10.1140/epjb/e2004-00301-0 (https://doi.org/10.1140%2Fepjb%2Fe2004-00301-0).
S2CID 9233932 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9233932).
8. Shah, Preya; Ashourvan, Arian; Mikhail, Fadi; Pines, Adam; Kini, Lohith; Oechsel, Kelly; Das,
Sandhitsu R; Stein, Joel M; Shinohara, Russell T (2019-07-01). "Characterizing the role of the
structural connectome in seizure dynamics" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC65
98625). Brain. 142 (7): 1955–1972. doi:10.1093/brain/awz125 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fbrai
n%2Fawz125). ISSN 0006-8950 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0006-8950). PMC 6598625 (htt
ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598625). PMID 31099821 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/31099821).
9. Adali, Tulay; Ortega, Antonio (May 2018). "Applications of Graph Theory [Scanning the Issue]"
(https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8349656). Proceedings of the IEEE. 106 (5): 784–786.
doi:10.1109/JPROC.2018.2820300 (https://doi.org/10.1109%2FJPROC.2018.2820300).
ISSN 0018-9219 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/0018-9219).
10. Grandjean, Martin (2016). "A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities
community" (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01517493/file/A%20social%20network%20anal
ysis%20of%20Twitter%20Mapping%20the%20digital%20humanities%20community.pdf)
(PDF). Cogent Arts & Humanities. 3 (1): 1171458. doi:10.1080/23311983.2016.1171458 (http
s://doi.org/10.1080%2F23311983.2016.1171458). S2CID 114999767 (https://api.semanticschol
ar.org/CorpusID:114999767).
11. Vecchio, F (2017). " "Small World" architecture in brain connectivity and hippocampal volume in
Alzheimer's disease: a study via graph theory from EEG data". Brain Imaging and Behavior. 11
(2): 473–485. doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9528-3 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11682-016-9528-3)
. PMID 26960946 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26960946). S2CID 3987492 (https://api.se
manticscholar.org/CorpusID:3987492).
12. Vecchio, F (2013). "Brain network connectivity assessed using graph theory in frontotemporal
dementia". Neurology. 81 (2): 134–143. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829a33f8 (https://doi.org/1
0.1212%2FWNL.0b013e31829a33f8). PMID 23719145 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2371
9145). S2CID 28334693 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:28334693).
29. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2002), "The George Polya Prize", Looking
Back, Looking Ahead: A SIAM History (http://www.siam.org/about/more/siam50.pdf) (PDF),
p. 26, retrieved 2016-03-14
30. Heinrich Heesch: Untersuchungen zum Vierfarbenproblem. Mannheim: Bibliographisches
Institut 1969.
31. Appel, K.; Haken, W. (1977), "Every planar map is four colorable. Part I. Discharging", Illinois J.
Math., 21 (3): 429–490, doi:10.1215/ijm/1256049011 (https://doi.org/10.1215%2Fijm%2F12560
49011).
32. Appel, K.; Haken, W. (1977), "Every planar map is four colorable. Part II. Reducibility", Illinois
J. Math., 21 (3): 491–567, doi:10.1215/ijm/1256049012 (https://doi.org/10.1215%2Fijm%2F125
6049012).
33. Robertson, N.; Sanders, D.; Seymour, P.; Thomas, R. (1997), "The four color theorem", Journal
of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 70: 2–44, doi:10.1006/jctb.1997.1750 (https://doi.org/10.100
6%2Fjctb.1997.1750).
34. Kepner, Jeremy; Gilbert, John (2011). Graph Algorithms in the Language of Linear Algebra (htt
ps://my.siam.org/Store/Product/viewproduct/?ProductId=106663). SIAM. p. 1171458.
ISBN 978-0-898719-90-1.
References
Bender, Edward A.; Williamson, S. Gill (2010). Lists, Decisions and Graphs. With an
Introduction to Probability (https://books.google.com/books?id=vaXv_yhefG8C).
Claude, Claude (1958). Théorie des graphes et ses applications. Paris: Dunod. English edition,
Wiley 1961; Methuen & Co, New York 1962; Russian, Moscow 1961; Spanish, Mexico 1962;
Roumanian, Bucharest 1969; Chinese, Shanghai 1963; Second printing of the 1962 first
English edition, Dover, New York 2001.
Biggs, N.; Lloyd, E.; Wilson, R. (1986). Graph Theory, 1736–1936. Oxford University Press.
Bondy, J. A.; Murty, U. S. R. (2008). Graph Theory. Springer. ISBN 978-1-84628-969-9.
Bollobás, Béla; Riordan, O. M. (2003). Mathematical results on scale-free random graphs in
"Handbook of Graphs and Networks" (S. Bornholdt and H.G. Schuster (eds)) (1st ed.).
Weinheim: Wiley VCH.
Chartrand, Gary (1985). Introductory Graph Theory (https://archive.org/details/introductorygrap
0000char). Dover. ISBN 0-486-24775-9.
Deo, Narsingh (1974). Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science
(https://www.edutechlearners.com/download/Graphtheory.pdf) (PDF). Englewood, New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-363473-6.
Gibbons, Alan (1985). Algorithmic Graph Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Reuven Cohen, Shlomo Havlin (2010). Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness and
Function (https://books.google.com/books?id=1ECLiFrKulIC&q=graph&pg=PR5). Cambridge
University Press. ISBN 9781139489270.
Golumbic, Martin (1980). Algorithmic Graph Theory and Perfect Graphs. Academic Press.
Harary, Frank (1969). Graph Theory. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Harary, Frank; Palmer, Edgar M. (1973). Graphical Enumeration. New York, New York:
Academic Press.
Mahadev, N. V. R.; Peled, Uri N. (1995). Threshold Graphs and Related Topics. North-Holland.
Newman, Mark (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Kepner, Jeremy; Gilbert, John (2011). Graph Algorithms in The Language of Linear Algebra (ht
tps://my.siam.org/Store/Product/viewproduct/?ProductId=106663). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:
SIAM. ISBN 978-0-898719-90-1.
External links
"Graph theory" (https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Graph_theory),
Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
Graph theory tutorial (http://www.utm.edu/departments/math/graph/)
A searchable database of small connected graphs (http://www.gfredericks.com/main/sandbox/
graphs)
Image gallery: graphs (https://web.archive.org/web/20060206155001/http://www.nd.edu/~netw
orks/gallery.htm) at the Wayback Machine (archived February 6, 2006)
Concise, annotated list of graph theory resources for researchers (https://web.archive.org/web/
20190713044422/http://www.babelgraph.org/links.html)
rocs (http://www.kde.org/applications/education/rocs/) — a graph theory IDE
The Social Life of Routers (http://www.orgnet.com/SocialLifeOfRouters.pdf) — non-technical
paper discussing graphs of people and computers
Graph Theory Software (http://graphtheorysoftware.com/) — tools to teach and learn graph
theory
Online books (https://ftl.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/ftl?st=&su=Graph+theory&library=OLBP), and
library resources in your library (https://ftl.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/ftl?st=&su=Graph+theory) and in
other libraries (https://ftl.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/ftl?st=&su=Graph+theory&library=0CHOOSE0)
about graph theory
A list of graph algorithms (http://www.martinbroadhurst.com/Graph-algorithms.html) with
references and links to graph library implementations
Online textbooks
Phase Transitions in Combinatorial Optimization Problems, Section 3: Introduction to Graphs
(https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0602129) (2006) by Hartmann and Weigt
Digraphs: Theory Algorithms and Applications (http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/books/dbook/) 2007 by
Jorgen Bang-Jensen and Gregory Gutin
Graph Theory, by Reinhard Diestel (http://diestel-graph-theory.com/index.html)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using
this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.