NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution
ESSENTIAL QUESTION
What influenced the development of our government institutions?
Reading HELPDESK
Academic Vocabulary
populous having a large population
export a product, good, resource, or other material that is sold and sent to another country as
part of international trade
Content Vocabulary
bicameral relative to a two-house legislative body
interstate commerce trade between the states
extralegal not sanctioned by law
TAKING NOTES: Key Ideas and Details
CONTRASTING Use the graphic organizer to contrast the interests of the small states and the
large states.
STATE INTERESTS
Small States Large States
Small states favored the New Jersey The large states would favor the
Plan because the government would Virginia Plan because the number of
have a unicameral legislature in which legislators would vary from state to
all states would have one vote. This state and would be determined by
made every state equal. how many people lived in the state.
Therefore, the state with a bigger
population would be in advantage.
1
NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution, continued
ESSENTIAL QUESTION
What influenced the development of our government institutions?
Assume that you move to an island that has never been inhabited before now. Several thousand
other people have also moved there in the past year. Everyone agrees that the island needs to
have some rules and someone needs to be in charge. You must create a plan to choose the
leaders in the fairest way possible. Consider the following questions as you create your plan:
a. Who should get to decide what the rules should be? Options include: only the people who have
been there the longest and know the island well, only the most educated people, only those
above a certain age, or everyone.
b. Should families vote as a unit, or can each person in the family get his or her own vote?
c. Should all families get one vote, regardless of their size? Or should families with six children get
more votes than families with two kids?
Once you have developed a plan that you think is fair, discuss it with your classmates. Try to reach a
consensus about how the island’s leaders will be chosen.
The Constitutional Convention: Agreements and Compromises
Guiding Question How did the Constitutional Convention reflect compromises between the
states’ competing interests?
In May 1787, the Constitutional Convention began the difficult task of crafting a new system of
government. The state legislatures sent 55 delegates to Philadelphia. Many of these men had a great
deal of experience working in politics and government. George Washington and Benjamin Franklin
both took active roles in the debates at the convention. Two other Pennsylvanians made important
contributions, too. Gouverneur Morris wrote the final draft of the Constitution, and James Wilson did
important work on the details of the document. James Madison of Virginia was the author of the basic
plan of government that the convention eventually adopted. His careful notes are our major source of
information about the convention’s work.
The convention began by unanimously choosing George Washington to preside over the meetings.
It was decided that each state would have one vote on all questions, and a simple majority of the
states present would make decisions. The public and press were not permitted to attend the meetings.
The delegates hoped that the private setting would allow them to talk freely.
Key Agreements
After deciding to abandon the Articles of Confederation, the delegates reached a consensus on many
Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education
basic issues of forming a new government. They all favored the ideas of limited and representative
government. They agreed that the powers of the national government should be divided among
legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The delegates all believed it was necessary to limit the
states’ power to coin money and interfere with creditors’ rights. And all of them agreed that they
should strengthen the national government.
The great debates and compromises of the convention were not over these fundamental questions;
rather, they dealt with how to put these ideas into practice.
2
NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution, continued
The Virginia Plan
The debates opened with a proposal from the Virginia delegation, which outlined a plan for a strong
national government. The plan proposed a government based on three principles. First, the government
would have a strong national legislature with two chambers. The lower chamber would be chosen by
the people and the upper chamber would be chosen by the lower. The number of legislators would vary
from state to state and would be determined by how many people lived in the state. The legislature
would also have the power to bar any state laws it believed to be unconstitutional. Second, a strong
executive would be chosen by the national legislature. Third, a national judiciary would be appointed
by the legislature.
The delegates debated the Virginia Plan for more than two weeks. Delegates from the smaller
states quickly realized that the larger, more populous states would be in control of a strong national
government under this plan. The smaller states wanted a less powerful central government and more
independence for the states.
The New Jersey Plan
The delegates for the small states made a counterproposal. The New Jersey Plan called for keeping
two major features of the Articles of Confederation. First, the government would have a unicameral
legislature with one vote for each state. This made all states equally powerful, regardless of their
population. Second, the nation would continue to function as a confederation of sovereign states.
Congress, however, would be strengthened by having the power to impose taxes and regulate trade.
A weak executive, consisting of more than one person, would be elected by Congress. A national
judiciary with limited power would be appointed by the executive.
As the summer wore on, the convention became deadlocked over the question of the representation
of states in Congress. The debate was bitter, and the convention was in danger of dissolving.
The Connecticut Compromise
Finally, a special committee agreed on a compromise. Called the Connecticut Compromise, or the Great
Compromise, this plan was adopted after a long debate. The compromise suggested that the legislative
branch should be bicameral, or have two houses. One would be a House of Representatives, with the
number of representatives based on each state’s population. The other would be a Senate, with two
members from each state. The larger states would have an advantage in the House of Representatives,
where representation would be based on population. Congress would be able to impose taxes, and all
laws concerning taxing and spending would originate in the House. The smaller states would be
protected in the Senate, with equal representation and state legislatures electing the senators.
Compromises About the Presidency
There was further disagreement over whether the president should be elected directly by the people,
by the Congress, or by state legislatures. As a compromise, the delegates finally settled on the
Electoral College system, which is still used today. In this system, voters from each state select electors
to choose the president. The president’s four-year term was a compromise between those who wanted
a longer term and those who feared a long term would give a president too much power.
3
NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution, continued
Reading Progress Check
Explaining What was the Connecticut Compromise? Which elements of the Virginia Plan and
the New Jersey Plan were incorporated into the compromise?
They were equalizing the power of all states to have a say in the choosing of their
representatives. The larger states would have an advantage in the house and the smaller states
would be protected in the Senate.
Disputes over Slavery
Guiding Question How did the Constitutional Convention deal with slavery, one of the most
divisive issues of the period?
James Madison’s notes tell us that the delegates disagreed about how to handle slavery. At the time
of the convention, several Northern states were making plans to abolish slavery. Many delegates were
opposed to slavery and some wanted it abolished. However, it was clear that the Southern states
would never accept the Constitution if it interfered with slavery. In the end, the delegates did not deal
with the issue. The Constitution mentions the slave trade and escaped enslaved persons but does not
address legal or moral issues related to the ownership of enslaved persons. In fact, the Constitution
does not include the word slave anywhere. Instead of saying “slave” or “slavery,” the Constitution
refers to the “importation” of people, and “persons held to service or labor.”
The delegates realized that their compromises on slavery had not completely solved the issue. They
had compromised in order to create the new government. But their refusal to deal with slavery
entirely left the matter to later generations of Americans to resolve.
The Three-Fifths Compromise
There was great disagreement about how to count enslaved persons in matters of representation and
taxation. Almost one-third of the people living in the Southern states were enslaved African
Americans. Delegates from these states wanted enslaved persons to be counted the same as free
people to give the South more representation in Congress. At the same time, the Southern states did
not want enslaved persons counted at all when it came to paying taxes. Because few enslaved persons
lived in the North, Northern states took the opposite position. They wanted enslaved persons counted
for tax purposes but not for representation.
The Three-Fifths Compromise settled this deadlock. Instead of counting every enslaved person, only
Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education
three-fifths of the group were to be counted for both tax purposes and for representation. Enslaved
persons were counted in this way until 1868. By that date, the three-fifths rule had been eliminated by
two events. One was the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery. The other was the
passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, making it a rule to count a state’s entire population when
figuring out representation in Congress.
Commerce and the Slave Trade
A third compromise resolved a dispute over commerce and the slave trade—not slavery itself, but the
continuing transport and sale of enslaved persons. The Northern states wanted the federal government
4
NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution, continued
to have complete control over trade with other nations. The Southern states were afraid that the
federal government would interfere with the slave trade. States in the South depended heavily on
agricultural exports such as cotton and tobacco. Southern farmers could not produce large crops and
make huge profits without using slave labor. Southern states also feared that business interests in the
North would have enough votes in Congress to impose export taxes or pass trade agreements that
would hurt the South.
As a compromise, the delegates decided that Congress would have the power to regulate both
interstate commerce and commerce with foreign countries. However, Congress could not ban the
slave trade before 1808. To protect the South’s exports, Congress was also prevented from imposing
export taxes. As a result, the United States is one of the few nations in the world today that does not
directly tax the goods it exports.
Reading Progress Check
Describing What was the Three-Fifths Compromise? Why did it satisfy states in the North and
the South?
The South didn't want slaves to be counted for the purpose of levying taxes, but wanted them to
be counted for representation in Congress. However, the North wanted to the slaves to be
counted for levyin taxes but not for representation.
Ratifying the Constitution
Guiding Question How did supporters and opponents of the Constitution argue for and
against its adoption?
By September 17, 1787, the Constitution was complete. Thirty-nine delegates signed the document,
including the aging Ben Franklin, who had to be helped to the table to sign it. Before the new
Constitution could become law, however, it had to be ratified by nine of the thirteen states.
The Constitution went into effect in June 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth state to
ratify it. However, the political debate over ratification lasted until May 29, 1790, when Rhode Island
became the last state to ratify.
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists
The question of ratification quickly divided the people in the states. One group, known as the Federalists,
favored the new Constitution. Many of the Founders were Federalists. Much of their support came from
merchants and others in the cities and coastal regions. The other group, called the Anti-Federalists,
opposed the new Constitution. Much of their support came from the inland farmers and laborers, who
feared a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists criticized the Constitution for having been
drafted in secret. They claimed the document was extralegal, not sanctioned by law, because the
convention had the authority only to revise the old Articles of Confederation, not to form a new government.
The Anti-Federalists further argued that the Constitution took important powers away from the states.
The Anti-Federalists’ strongest argument was that the Constitution lacked a bill of rights to protect
citizens from their own government. The convention had, in fact, thought of adding a list of people’s
5
NAME ________________________________________ DATE _______________ CLASS _________
Reading Essentials and Study Guide
Chapter 2 Origins of American Government
Lesson 4 Creating the Constitution, continued
rights. In their talks, they reasoned that it was not necessary to have a bill of rights because the
Constitution did not give the government the power to violate the rights of the people.
This reasoning was not good enough for the Anti-Federalists. They warned that without a bill of
rights, a strong national government might take away the rights that were won in the Revolution. They
demanded that the new Constitution clearly guarantee citizens’ freedoms. One of the strongest
opponents of the Constitution was Patrick Henry, the passionate delegate from Virginia. He insisted
that rights not clearly given to the people could be taken away from them by rulers.
The Federalists claimed that only a strong national government could protect the nation from
foreign enemies and solve the country’s problems. The Federalists also pointed out that eight of the
states already had a bill of rights in their state constitution. In the end, the Federalists promised to add
a bill of rights as the first order of business when the new government met.
Progress Toward Ratification
With the promise of a bill of rights, more American citizens were in favor of the Constitution. Many
small states ratified it quickly because they were pleased with equal representation in the new
Senate. By 1788, the legislatures in Virginia and New York had not yet held a vote on the new
Constitution. Everyone knew that without the support of those two large and powerful states, the
Constitution would not succeed. The Federalists won in a close vote in Virginia on June 25, 1788.
To help win the battle in New York, vocal supporters published more than 80 essays defending the
new Constitution. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison wrote most of the essays, called The
Federalist Papers. Madison brilliantly answered the opposition’s fears about having a big government.
In The Federalist No. 10, he said that the more government is extended to include everyone, the less
likely it is that a majority will attack the rights of other citizens. On July 26, 1788, the Federalists in
New York won by three votes. In The Federalist No. 39, Madison defines a republic as “a government
which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is
administered by persons holding their offices . . . for a limited period.”
The New Government Begins Its Work
Once the new government was established, George Washington was elected president and John
Adams vice president. Voters also elected senators and representatives. On March 4, 1789, Congress
met for the first time in Federal Hall in New York City, the temporary capital. To fulfill the promises
made during the fight for ratification, James Madison introduced a set of amendments during the first
session. Congress approved 12 amendments. The states ratified 10 of them in 1791. These amendments
became known as the Bill of Rights.
Reading Progress Check
Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education
Assessing Do you think having a bill of rights was necessary? Why or why not?
In my personal opinion, I think Bill of Rights was neccessary (well I could care less honestly)
but without the Bill of Rights, citizen's rights will be easy to take away since the government has
so much power.
