Business Law: Assignment
Business Law: Assignment
Business Law: Assignment
Business Law
Definition of Contract: The Indian Contract Act 1872 states the term contract is like an
agreement that creates an obligation between parties. According to the act, the contract is "an
agreement enforceable by law."
Essentials of a Valid Contract:
1. Offer and Acceptance
Generally, the written contract only unfolds when the other party accepts the offer by one party and is
definite in all sense. The offer or agreement must be clear and complete in all sense. Both parties should
communicate to ensure there is no lapse of the contract act. Both the offer and acceptance must be
"consensus ad idem" ,meaning, both parties must comply on the same thing.
4. Legal Formalities
In this agreement, if there is any uncertainty and both parties are not capable of finding the right path,
then it is deemed void. As a part of essentials of a valid consideration, the terms and conditions of the
contract should be concrete. Any contract, which is uncertain in any sense, can be termed as void. The
terms mentioned in the agreement should be capable of performing specific thoughts.
5. Consideration
Consideration means the moral value given for the performance of the promise. It should not be only
limited to money, but there should be some value to what has been agreed upon. One of the
essentials of valid consideration is that it should not be adequate, but should carry some value.
6. Capacity of parties.
The parties to an agreement must be competent to contract. If either of the parties does not have
the capacity to contract, the contract is not valid. According the following persons are
incompetent to contract. (a) Miners, (b) Persons of unsound mind, and (c) persons disqualified
by law to which they are subject.
7. Free Consent.
'Consent' means the parties must have agreed upon the same thing in the same sense. An
agreement should be made by the free consent of the parties.
Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by-
Coercion
Undue influence
Fraud
Misrepresentation
Mistake
8. Lawful Object.
Object has nothing to do with consideration. It means the purpose or design of the contract.
Thus, when one hires a house for use as an office for an e-Commerce company, the object of the
contract is to run an e-Commerce Company.
The Object is said to be unlawful if- (a) it is forbidden by law; (b) it is of such nature that if
permitted it would defeat the provision of any law; (c) it is fraudulent; (d) it involves an injury to
the person or property of any other; (e) the court regards it as immoral or opposed to public
policy.
9. Certainty of Meaning.
Agreement the meaning of which is not Certain or capable of being made certain are void. A
poorly drafted agreement which is ambiguous in nature is not legally valid.
10. Not Declared to be void or Illegal.
The agreement, though satisfying all the conditions for a valid contract must not have been
expressly declared void by any law in force in the country. For example an agreement to form a
cartel to curb competition is illegal in India.
Express= An express contract is an exchange of promises in which the terms by which the
parties agree to be bound are declared either orally or in writing, or a combination of both, at the
time it is made.
Implied= An implied contract is a legally-binding obligation that derives from actions,
conduct, or circumstances of one or more parties in an agreement. It has the same legal force as
an express contract, which is a contract that is voluntarily entered into and agreed on verbally or
in writing by two or more parties.
Quasi =A quasi contract is a retroactive arrangement between two parties who have no previous
obligations to one another. It is created by a judge to correct a circumstance in which one party
acquires something at the expense of the other.
The contract aims to prevent one party from unfairly benefiting from the situation at the other
party's expense. These arrangements may be imposed when goods or services are accepted,
though not requested, by a party. The acceptance then creates an expectation of payment.
Requirements of Quasi:
One party, the plaintiff, must have furnished a tangible item or service to another party,
or the defendant, with the expectation or implication that payment would be given.
The defendant must have accepted—or acknowledged receipt of—the item of value, but
made no effort or offer to pay for it.
The plaintiff must then express why it is unjust for the defendant to receive the good or
service without paying for it. In other words, the plaintiff must establish that the
defendant received unjust enrichment.
There are two contracts attached in
the document :