Chasma Barrage Complete Dseign
Chasma Barrage Complete Dseign
Chasma Barrage Complete Dseign
Data
Maximum Discharge 950000.0 Cusecs
Minimum Discharge 20000.0 Cusecs
River Bed Level RBL 612.0 Ft
Maximum Storage Level 649.0 Ft
Highest Flood Level HFL (From Rating Curve) 635.0 Ft
Lowest Water Level LWL (From Rating Curve) 620.0 Ft
Minimum Pond Level 637.0 Ft
Number of Canals on Right Bank (CRBC) 1.0 Nos
Number of Canals on Left Bank (CJ Link) 1.0 Nos
Maximum Discharge of CJ Link Canal 21700.0 Cusecs
Maximum Discharge of CRBC Canal 4700.0 Cusecs
Slope of the River 1.0 Ft/mile
Design of Barrage Profile for overflow conditions
= 1.37
4.0 Design of undersluices
h = USEL-3-Clus= 21.80 Ft
h/Eo = 0.88
C'/C = 0.70 (From Gibson's Curve )
C' = 2.66
Q1 and Q3 = C' * Lus * Eo^3/2
= 197151 cfs
Qmain weir = 779986 cfs
So
Total Discharge is
977137 Vs 950000
O.K
For each the following states of the river bed will be considered
i. Retrogressed state
ii. Normal state
The fixation of floor level can be done by any one of the following methods and
checked by the others
i. Blench curves
ii. Crumps curves
iii. Conjugate depth method
The DSFL that satisfies the worst condition for the formation of hydraulic jump
1.0 Using Blench Curves
6.00 ft
E2 29.3 From Blench Curve
DSFL DSEL - E2
609.72 ft
b) For Qmax 950000 cfs
qclear 304.5 cfs/ft
hL USEL - DSEL
5.00 ft
E2 26
DSFL DSEL - E2
610.35
c) For 0.5 Qmax= 475000 cfs
qclear 152.2 cfs/ft
hL USEL - DSEL
4.00 ft
E2 16.5
DSFL DSEL - E2
616.3 ft
Q q HL E2 DSFL
1140000 365 10.50 31.2 602.32
950000 304 10.00 28.2 602.15
475000 152 9.50 18.5 605.3
For Undersluices:
Min DSFL= 588.244 ft
7.0 Fixation of d/s floor level for normal barrage section using Crump's method
and determination of floor length.
a) Q 950000 cfs
Max Max DSWL 635 ft
USWL 640 ft
RBL 612 ft
Crest level 621.2 ft
DSFL 602.2 ft
Dpool 32.9 ft
USEL 641.35
d/s Velocity 8.14 ft/sec
ho 1.03 ft
DSEL 636.03 ft
K 20.17 ft
L 5.32 ft
q 304.49 cfs
C (q2/g)1/3
14.23 ft
L/C 0.37
(K+F)/C (From Crumps curves)2.2 (From Crumps curves)
so F 11.13
Level of intersection of jump with glacis is
Crest level - F 610.052
E2 25.98
submergence of jump 7.90 ft
length of glacis d/s of jump= 3xE223.7
length of stilling pool 4.5xE2
116.90
length of d/s floor 93.19
Say 95.0 ft
Q 950000 cfs
b) DSWL 629 ft
Min USWL 639 ft
Dpool 26.9 ft
d/s Velocity 9.96 ft/sec
ho 1.54 ft
DSEL 630.54 ft
K 17.82 ft
L 9.81 ft
q 304.49 cfs
C 14.23 ft
L/C 0.7
(K+F)/C 2.5
F 17.74 ft
Level of intersec 603.4 ft
E2 27.11 ft
submergence of 1.28 ft
Say 148 ft
Q=Discharge
Q1=discharge in river
through thecfs
main 950000 475000
weir=80% Q 760000 380000
Max Min Max Min
USEL 641.35 640.35 636.85 633.35
E= USEL - DSEL 39.2 38.2 34.7 31.2
q= Q1/2520 301.6 301.6 150.8 150.8
Dpool= DSWL - DSFL 32.9 26.9 29.9 20.9
E3/2 245.4 236.1 204.4 174.3
F(z) = q/E 3/2
1.23 1.28 0.74 0.87
conjugate depth z 0.17 0.18 0.10 0.12
Coefficient z' 0.67 0.68 0.55 0.58
Conjugate deths d1=z*E 6.6 6.9 3.4 3.6
Conjugate deths d2=z'*E 26.3 26.0 18.9 18.1
jump sumbergence =Dpool-d2 6.6 0.9 10.9 2.8
Remarks: Jump is submerged in all cases.
NOTE: By lowering the DSFL or by making wall at d/s we will have some submergency
b) for undersluices section: DSFL= 588.244 ft
R 35.37 ft
(a) d/s scour protection
Safety factor 1.75x for d/s floor critical condition
Depth R' 61.9
Min water level for the .95 million cfs discharge
629 ft
d/s apron level 602.2 ft
depth of water on apron 26.9 ft
add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration
D' 27.4 ft
R' -D' 34.5 ft
length of apron to cover a surface of scour at 1:3 slope
√(32+12)x(R' - D')
109.23 ft
Therefore the length of d/s stone apron in horizontal position
109.23x(1.25 t/1.75 t)
78.02 ft
(b) u/s scour protection
Safety factor 1.25x for u/s floor critical condition
Depth R' 44.2
Min u/s water level for the 0.95 millionn cfs discharge
639 ft
u/s apron level 612 ft
depth of water on apron 27 ft
add 0.5 ft increase in depth for concentration
D' 27.5 ft
R' -D' 16.7 ft
length of apron to cover a surface of scour at 1:3 slope
√(32+12)x(R' - D')
52.84 ft say 53 ft
Therefore the length of u/s stone apron in horizontal position
53x(1.25 t/1.75 t)
37.86 ft
© Thickness of aprons
Following table gives the value of 't' (thickness of apron) for various grades of sand and
slope of river.
Fall in inches/mile 3 9 12 18 24
Sand classification Thickness of stone pitching in inches
very coarse 16 19 22 25 28
coarse 22 25 28 31 34
medium 28 31 34 37 40
fine 34 37 40 43 46
very fine 40 43 45 49 52
As our slope is 12"/mile and assumed that river bed is comprised of medium sand,so
our corresponding value for 't' is 34.
1.75x(34/12)
4.96 ft say 5.0 ft
So
Total length of d/s apron 78.02 ft
4' thick block apron 26.01 ft say 26.0 ft (78/3)
5' thick stone apron 52.02 ft say 52.0 ft (78x2/3)
And
Total length of u/s apron 37.86 ft
4' thick block apron 12.62 ft say 13.0 ft (38/3)
5' thick stone apron 25.24 ft say 25.0 ft (38x2/3)
12 Design of Guide banks
i) Length of each guide bank measured in a straight line along the barrage u/s is
L u/s 1.5x3553 ft
5330 ft
ii) L d/s 710.6 ft
iii) For the nose of the u/s guide bank and the full length of d/s guide bank use Lacey's depth
1.75xR
61.89 ft
for the remaining u/s guide bank Lacey's depth
1.25xR
44.21 ft
iv) possible slope of scour 1:03
v) free board u/s 10 ft from HFL
free board d/s 8 ft from HFL
vi) top width of guide bank 40 ft
vii) side slope of guide bank
viii) min apron thickness 4 ft
length of barrage 3553
length of u/s guide bank 5330
length of d/s guide bank 710.6
radius of u/s curved part 600 ft
radius of d/s curved part 400 ft
max u/s angle projected 140 degree
max d/s angle projected 57-80 degree
The following formula for the backwater curve given in Merrimen's treatise on hydraulics can
be used to determine water levels at the u/s nose of the guide banks
Rise in RBL = 1.07 from the level at the barrage water level along h/w axis
at 5330' u/s of barrage
= 640.65 ft
Extensive experiments have shown that it is not necessary for a filter to restrain all particles
of the soil.Instead it may restrain 15% coarser or the D85 of the soil.These voids will create
smaller openings to trap finer soil particles. Therefore the diameter of the openings of the
of the filter must be less than D85 of the soil.Since the effective pore diameter is about
1/5D15 therefore
D85 (filter) ≤ 5 D85 (soil)
If the filter is to provide free drainage it must be much more pervious than the soil and in
such a case the other criterion is
D15 (filter) ≥ 5 D15 (soil)
D85 of the river bed soil may be determined from the soil gradation curve. For the bottom
layer of the filter D15 would be 5xD85 of soil which would fix the average grain size of the
filter material.The thickness may be taken to be 6" to 9" . The upper layers may be designed
on the same basis.
The concrete blocks of 4'x4'x4' will be placed over 2 ft thick inverted filter which consists of
a 9" layer of coarse shingle (3/4" - 3" ) over 6" layer of fine shingle (3/6" - 3/4"). There are
2" wide spacings on the sides of the blocks which are filled with fine shingles to provide
free seepage flow.
13.0 Design of guide bank apron
Working on the same as in section 10 (Scour protection )
Length of unlaunched (horizontal) apron = 2.5 (R' - D') 86.36
length of launched apron at 1:3 slope = √10 (R' - D') 109.23
as calculated previously t = 34" , say 3 ft
so
Volume of stones in apron = 3x3.16 (R' - D') = 328.16 ft3
minimum thickness of unlaunched apron= 1.07x3 = 3.21 ft
mean thickness of unlaunched apron = [9.5(R'-D')]/[2.5(R'-D')]
= 3.8 ft
maximum thickness of unlaunched apron = 2 x 3.80 -3.2
= 4.4 ft
and t = 3 ft
Values of R' for various areas is tabulated below
T = d/D ф (d/D)
1.000 __
1.001 2.1837
1.005 1.6486
1.006 1.5881
1.007 1.5371
1.008 1.4929
1.01 1.4192
1.02 1.1914
1.03 1.0596
1.04 0.9669
1.05 0.8968
1.06 0.8382
1.10 0.6806
1.15 0.5608
1.20 0.4798
1.25 0.4198
1.30 0.3731
1.35 0.3352
Read the values of ф (d1/D) and ф (d2/D) in the above equation corresponding to
the ratioes
T1 = d1/D
and T2 = d2/D
at the maximum flood discharges at .95 millions cfs, maximum u/s water level is 640
now
d1 = 640 - 612 = 28 ft
D = 635-612 = 23 ft
We shall find length of backwater curve by using 0.5 ft increaments, untill we approach the
normal river depth of 23 ft starting from d1= 28 ft
Table for length of backwater curve
Ge = ( H/d) * (1/(pi)x√λ)
Let the water be headed up to a level of 635.0 ft on the u/s side with
no flow d/s .Assume maximum retreogression of 5 ft to have occurred in the d/s river bed.
Differential head causing seepage = H
635 -( 602 - 5)
38 ft
depth of d/s sheet pile = d = 612-560
52 ft
Total length of concrete floor = b
= 300 ft
α = 5.77
From grahp α versus 1/∏√λ
for α = 5.77 1/∏√λ = 0.18
so
GE = 0.13 < 2 (O.K)
Critical value of floatation gradient is 1:1 and allowing a factor of safety of 5 to 7
it comes out to be 1/5 to 1/7
17 Calculation of uplift pressures after applying corrections
a) u/s pile line
b1 = length of concrete floor upto the u/s sheet pile = 32 ft
b = 300 ft
d = 582 - 577 = 22.0 ft
assume tf = u/s floor thickness = 2.5 ft
1/α = d/b = 0.07 α = 13.64 say= 30
b1/b = 0.11
1-(b1/b)= 0.89
фB = фD = 71 %
фA = фE = 72 %
фK = фC = 68 %
i) Correction for floor thickness
Correction in фK = tf (фB-фK)
= 0.34 %
Correction in фA = 0.11 %
ii) Correction for interference of sheet piles
Correction in фK due to second pile is
= 19[(d+D)/b]x√(D/B')
d = 582 -577 = 5 ft
D = 582 -570 = 12 ft
b = 300 ft
b' = 42.6 ft
Correction in фK = 0.57 %
b1 = 42.6 ft
so
Correction for фK = -1.39
hence corrected фA = 71.88636 %
corrected фB = 71 %
corrected фK = 70.31 %
b) Intermediate sheet pile at toe of d/s glacis
b1 = 74.6 ft
b = 155 ft
d = 27.15 ft
assume floor thickness 10 ft
α = b/d = 5.71
b1/b = 0.48 1-b1/b 0.52
фL = фE 53 %
фM = фD 55 %
фN = фC = 47 %
i) Correction for floor thickness
Correction in фL is
= 0.736648 %
Correction in фN = 2.95 %
= -0.571 %
bs = 6.2 ft
b1 = 42.6 ft
so
Correction for фL = 0.65 %
hence
corrected фL = 53.490 %
corrected фM = 55 %
corrected фN = 50.86 %
17.3 d/s sheet pile at the end of impervious floor
assume floor thickness = 7.0 ft b1/b= 0.48
d = 47.15 ft 1-b1/b= 0.52
1/α = d/b = 0.157 α = 6.36
фP = фE = 53 %
фQ = фD= 61 %
фR = фC = 42 %
i) Correction for floor thickness
Correction in фP =
= 1.2 %
Correction in фR = 2.82 %
ii/ Correction for interference of sheet piles
Correction in фp is
= -2.90 %
hence
Corrected фP = 54.71 %
Corrected фQ = 61 %
Corrected фR = 44.82 %
Symbols uses in
Khosla's curve u/s pile line intermediate line d/s pile line
фE фA = 72 фL = 53.49 фP = 54.71
фD фB = 71 фM = 55.0 фQ = 61
фC фK = 68 фN = 50.86 фP = 44.82
18.0 Calculation for floor thickness
Floor thickness
t = (ᶲ/100(G-1))xH
where
tf = thickness of floor in ft
ᶲ = % uplift pressure
H = maximum differential head causing seepage
G = specific gravity of concrete = 2.4
a) Thickness of floor at A
Assumed thickness = 2.5 ft
thickness from uplift pressure = 16.46 ft say= 17
Due to excessive weigth of water acting on the u/s floor, provide nominal thickness of 2.5 ft
Similarly o]provide 2.5 ft thick floor at K, and the thickness of u/s glacis floor is also to be
taken as 2.5 ft.
b) Thickness of floor at L
Assumed thickness = 10.0 ft
thickness from uplift pressure =
12.2 ft say 13.0 ft
c) Thickness of floor at N
Assumed thickness = 10.0 ft
thickness from uplift pressure =
12.6 ft say 13 ft
d) Thickness of floor at P
Assumed thickness = 7.0 ft
thickness from uplift pressure =
12.51 ft say 13 ft
e) Thickness of floor at crest
U/s of the gate over the crest, water is always standing hence provide nominal thickness
of 2.5 ft.
d/s of the gate water may not be present over the crest when the gate is closed.
= 13.7 ft
Provide a thickness of 15 ft.