CONCEPT
PAPER
RUBRICS
4
3
2
1
Problem
10
–
3
stars
8
–
2
stars
6
–
1
star
2
–
no
star,
problem
should
be
4
–
no
star,
but
shows
potential
changed,
but
submitted
2
or
more
drafts
0-‐ No
star,
problem
should
be
changed,
only
1
draft
submitted
Timeliness
Submitted
on
time
A
day
late
2-‐3
days
late
4-‐5
days
Completeness
of
Content
All
parts
are
present
One
part
missing
2-‐3
parts
laccking
Only
one
part
has
been
written
about
INTRODUCTION
i. Research
topic
Clear
description
of
the
A
description
of
the
topic
A
clear
topic
has
been
mentioned
Mention
of
res.
Topic
but
no
topic,
no
ambiguity
of
has
been
made
but
there
is
but
the
description
causes
description
what
the
student
slight
ambiguity
in
the
confusion
(unclear)
intends
to
work
on
intention
of
the
proposed
topic
ii.
Significance
of
the
topic
Highly
significant
,
Highly
significant
topic,
Significant
topic/beneficiaries
Not
significant
beneficiaries
are
clearly
beneficiaries
are
clearly
clearly
cited
and/or
benefits
cited
and
benefits
are
cited
BUT
the
benefits
are
clearly
stated.
clearly
stated.
not
clearly
stated.
iii.
Statement
of
the
Specific,
measurable,
1-‐2
of
the
characteristics
of
3
of
the
characteristics
of
a
good
Only
one
of
the
ideal
characteristics
Problem
(main
and
attainable,
results-‐ a
good
problem
NOT
research
problem
NOT
present
is
present
in
the
problem
stated.
subproblems)
oriented
and
time-‐ present
bound
BRIEF
LITERATURE
SURVEY
I.
Related
Literature
At
least
2
related
lit
At
least
2
rel.
literature
Only
1
primary
source
cited
and
No
primary
source
cited,
only
from
primary
sources
from
primary
sources
have
others
secondary
and
tertiary
secondary
and
tertiary
sources
have
been
described
been
described
AND
one
AND
at
least
another
2
from
secondary
and
tertiary
related
literature
from
secondary/tertiary
sources
have
been
described
Literature
cited
are
Lit
cited
are
relevant
and
Lit
cited
are
not
totally
relevant
Lit
cited
not
relevant/related;
NO
relevant
and
related;
related;
description
and
related
however,
descriptions
made
description
clearly
however
DOES
NOT
clearly
descriptions
have
been
made
states
what
the
lit
is
show
what
the
lit
is
about
about
4
3
2
1
Connection
of
cited
Discussion
clearly
Discussion
clearly
connects
Discussion
clearly
connects
ETIHER
of
the
criteria
is
present
scientific
lit
to
proposed
connects
problem
to
prob
to
lit;
justification
of
problem
to
cited
lit.
but
no
problem/s
cited
lit;
justification
of
why
ida/prob
may
be
justification
on
originality
is
made
why
idea/prob
may
be
considered
original
is
considered
original
is
superficial.
thoroughly
stated/discussed
FEASIBILITY
DISCUSSION
Discussion
of
the
Fails
to
mention
feasibility
Fails
to
mention
2-‐3
factors
Not
feasible
in
all
aspects
feasibility
is
thorough
of
1
factor
and
mention
of
the
availability
of
materials,
time
frame,
finances
is
made
CLOSING
STATEMENT
Limitation
of
the
Limitations
of
the
problem
Limitations
stated
but
no
No
limitation
stated
proposed
problem
inadequately
discussed
explanation
discussed
adequately
(with
explanation
for
why
these
are
considered
as
limitations)
LIST
OF
REFERENCES
Sufficient
number
of
3-‐4
references
cited
2
references
cited
No
list
of
references
references
(at
least
5);
all
citations
in-‐text
are
present
in
the
list
of
references;
clearly
described
(title,
author,
etc.)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Drafts
APPROVED
APPROVED
ONE
STAR,
with
at
ONE
STAR,
with
two
NO
STAR,
with
2-‐3
NO
STAR,
with
PROBLEM
with
a
PROBLEM
with
least
3
drafts
or
less
drafts
drafts,
each
draft
only
one
draft
maximum
of
3
more
than
3
drafts
OR
showing
drafts
No
star
but
with
4
improvement.
or
more
drafts
with
each
draft
showing
marked
improvement
