Cetalox and Analogues: Synthesis Via Acid-Mediated Polyene Cyclizations
Cetalox and Analogues: Synthesis Via Acid-Mediated Polyene Cyclizations
Cetalox and Analogues: Synthesis Via Acid-Mediated Polyene Cyclizations
5 (2008)
1) Ambrox2 (()-1) and Cetalox2 (( )-1) [2] are trade names of Firmenich SA.
i) ClCH2CO2Et, EtONa, 58; cat. AcONa, 2008. ii) CH2(CO2H)2 , Et3N, reflux. iii) 15% Ethanolic KOH.
iv) CF3CO2H, 08. v) NaAlH2(OCH2CH2OCH3 )2 (Vitride2 ), 608. vi) TsCl, pyridine, 08.
i) SnCl4 , CH2Cl2 , 108. ii) NaH, allyl bromide, DMF, r.t.; xylene, reflux. iii) CaCl2 · 2 H2O, DMSO, reflux.
iv) MeMgI, Et2O. v) O3 , MeOH, 208. vi) NaBH4 , MeOH, r.t. vii) Cat. TsOH · H2O, MeNO2 , 308.
i) LiAlH4 , Et2O, r.t. ii) MsCl, pyridine, 08. iii) Pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC), AcONa, CH2Cl2 , r.t.
iv) 1,5-Diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene (DBN), toluene, r.t. v) KCN, NH4Cl, DMF/H2O, r.t. vi) KOH,
MeOH/H2O, reflux. vii) MeLi, THF/H2O, 608 to r.t. viii) Cat. TsOH · H2O, toluene, reflux. ix) Cat.
TsOH · H2O, MeNO2 , 308.
CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008) 961
2) For other examples of this reaction, the pioneering work of Smit and co-workers, and Vlad et al.
deserves special mention [8].
962 CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008)
Synthesis of 19. – The racemic allenic alcohols (E)-18 and 20 were prepared from
unsaturated ketones (E)-19 and 2, respectively, by using a modification of a reported
procedure [14]. These two compounds were then submitted to identical conditions
(FSO3H, 2-nitropropane, 908 to 308), resulting in the stereoselective (88 and 84%
stereoselectivity, resp.) formation of 19 in 60 and 64% yield, respectively [15]
(Scheme 8). These acid-mediated polyene cyclizations, involving an alkene as the
initiating group and an allenic alcohol as the terminating group, are unprecedented. As
before, the stereochemical course of cyclization is directed by the conformation of an
intermediate cyclohexyl cation, and the process is non-synchronous. Moreover, it is
interesting to note that the catalytic hydrogenation of 19 shows complete b-face
selectivity, affording tricyclic ether 21 in 92% yield, and thus offers a novel access to this
powerful, woody odorant 3 ).
3) In comparison to its stereoisomers, ()-21 was reported to possess the strongest scent and lowest
threshold [16]; for a stereoselective synthesis of ()-21, see [17].
CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008) 963
i) Prop-2-yn-1-ol, KOH, THF, r.t. ii) Ac2O, Et3N, r.t. iii) Ethyl vinyl ether, cat. TsOH · H2O, toluene,
208. iv) LiAlH4 , THF, toluene, r.t. v) FSO3H (2.3 mol-equiv.), 2-nitropropane, 908 to 308. vi) H2 ,
cat. 10% Pd/C, toluene, r.t.
964 CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008)
Synthesis of 26. – Bicyclic homoallylic alcohols (E)-24 and (Z)-25 were prepared
from d-pyronene (1,1-dimethyl-2,3-dimethylidenecyclohexane; 22) as shown in
Scheme 9. These two compounds were then submitted to identical conditions
(chlorosulfonic acid (ClSO3H), CH2Cl2 , 808), resulting in the stereoselective (74
and 91% selectivity, resp.) formation of 26 in 52 and 31% yield, respectively [17].
i) Br2 , CH2Cl2 , 08. ii) Dimethyl 3-oxoglutarate, NaHCO3 , H2O/CH2Cl2 , r.t. iii) NaCl, H2O, DMSO, 128 –
1358. iv) [Ph3P(CH2 )3OH] + Br 7, BuLi (2 mol-equiv.), THF, 208 to r.t. v) NaH, THF; then tBuMe2SiCl,
52 – 548. vi) Pyridinium dichromate (PDC) (4 mol-equiv.), tBuO2H (3.1 mol equiv.), toluene, r.t. vii)
TsNHNH2 , EtOH, reflux. viii) Catecholborane (2 mol-equiv.), CHCl3 , 58; AcONa · 3 H2O, reflux. ix)
ClSO3H (5 mol-equiv.), CH2Cl2 , 808.
Organoleptic Properties of 19, 26, and 28. – In comparison with ( )-1, 19, despite a
lower substantivity, has a similar intensity, exhibiting the same characteristic amber and
woody notes. Concerning 26 and 28, due to the small amounts of material available,
only qualitative odor evaluations were effected; both 26 and 28 were perceived as
possessing a tenacious, amber odor fully comparable to that of ( )-1.
i) Prop-2-yn-1-ol, KOH, THF, r.t. ii) Ac2O, Et3N, r.t. iii) Ethyl vinyl ether, cat. TsOH · H2O, toluene,
208. iv) LiAlH4 , THF, toluene, r.t. v) ClSO3H (9 mol-equiv.), 2-nitropropane, 808.
1980s by Escher, starting from either (þ)-larixyl acetate or (þ)-sclareolide ((þ)-5) [19]
(see Scheme 11) 4 ).
i) 2-Methoxypropene, cat. hydroquinone, cat. TsOH · H2O, petroleum ether, 808. ii) 3-[(Trimethylsilyl)-
oxy]prop-1-yne, BuLi, THF, 908; 5% aq. HCl, r.t. iii) Ac2O, Et3N, cat. 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine
(DMAP), CH2Cl2 , 28. iv) Ethyl vinyl ether, cat. TsOH · H2O, toluene, 108 to 08. v) LiAlH4 , THF, 208.
vi) Ac2O, Et3N, cat. DMAP, toluene, r.t. vii) LiAlH4 , THF, toluene, reflux. viii) ClSO3H (6 mol-equiv.),
2-nitropropane, 808.
a
) Compound 33 was obtained as a 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 diastereoisomer mixture. b ) Compound 34 was obtained as a
1 : 1 diastereoisomer mixture.
Another cyclization route to 30 was also elaborated (see Scheme 13). This second
approach is fundamentally different from the first approach in that, although
cyclization termination is effected internally by a OH group, the initiating group is
CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008) 967
now an allylic alcohol rather than an alkene 5 ). The targeted cyclization substrate, diol
(E)-40, was synthesized from b-cyclocitral (2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-ene-1-carbalde-
hyde; 39) in eight steps (17% overall yield). Not unexpectedly, the acid-mediated
cyclization of (E)-40 using ClSO3H in 2-nitropropane at 808 was unsuccessful,
affording complex mixtures containing only small amounts (ca. 5%) of tricyclic ethers
36 and 30. Because solvolysis of the allylic CO bond of (E)-40 to the cyclohexane-
based allylic cation is required to trigger the cyclization, the best conditions were found
to be the use of a large excess of CF3COOH (TFA) in CH2Cl2 at 108. Subsequent
workup afforded a 1.3 : 1 mixture of 36 and 30 in 35% yield. The selectivity (43%) is low
for the desired product, but, as discussed previously, can be explained by inspection of
the respective transition states leading to 36 and 30.
i) 3-Chloro-2-methylprop-1-ene, Mg, Et2O, reflux. ii) NaH, tBu(Me)2SiCl, THF, reflux. iii) 1,9-
Borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9-BBN), THF, r.t.; 2.3n aq. NaOH soln., 35% aq. H2O2 soln., 458. iv) Oxalyl
chloride, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2 , 558 to r.t. v) (MeO)2P(O)CH2CO2Me, MeONa/MeOH, toluene, r.t.
vi) 1,8-Diazobicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), 95 – 988. vii) LiAlH4 , THF, reflux. viii) Bu4NF · 3 H2O,
THF, reflux. ix) CF3CO2H (32 mol-equiv.), CH2Cl2 , 108.
Organoleptic Properties of 30 and 37/38 (10 : 1). – Due to the limited amounts of
compounds available, only qualitative odor evaluations were possible. Nevertheless, in
comparison with Cetalox2, both 30 and 37/38 (10 : 1) were perceived as possessing a
similarly strong, ambery-woody tonality.
i) EtAlCl2 (1 mol-equiv.), CH2Cl2 , 08. ii) Cl3CCHO (2 mol-equiv.), 08. iii) Lithium diisopropylamide
(LDA; 1.25 mol-equiv.), THF, 58; Me3SiCl (2.4 mol-equiv.). iv) m-Chloroperbenzoic acid (mCPBA;
1.1 mol-equiv.), CH2Cl2 , 08. v) Ac2O/H2O (10 : 1), cat. TsOH · H2O, r.t. vi) LDA (1.25 mol-equiv.), THF,
708. vii) SOCl2 (5 mol-equiv.), pyridine, 308. viii) LiAlH4 , Et2O, r.t. ix) Cat. [RuH(h5-C8H11)2 ] +
[BF4 ] 7, CH2Cl2 , r.t. x) Et3SiH (2 mol-equiv.), Amberlyst2 15, r.t.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Stoll, M. Hinder, Helv. Chim. Acta 1950, 33, 1251; M. Hinder, M. Stoll, Helv. Chim. Acta 1950, 33,
1308.
[2] C. Chauffat, A. Morris, Perfum. Flavor. 2004, 29(2), 34.
[3] G. Ohloff, in PFragrance ChemistryA, Ed. E. T. Theimer, Academic Press, New York, 1982, p. 535.
[4] T. Kawanobe, K. Kogami, M. Matsui, Agric. Biol. Chem. 1986, 50, 1475.
[5] G. BKchi, H. WKest, Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72, 996.
[6] R. L. Snowden, S. M. Linder, Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 4119.
[7] R. L. Snowden, J.-C. Eichenberger, S. M. Linder, P. Sonnay, C. Vial, K.-H. Schulte-Elte, J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 955.
[8] G. E. Muntyan, M. Kurbanov, V. A. Smit, A. V. Semenovskii, V. F. Kucherov. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR
Ser. Khim. 1973, 633; P. F. Vlad, N. D. Ungar, V. B. Perutskii, Khim. Prir. Soedin 1986, 793; P. F.
Vlad, N. D. Ungar, V. B. Perutskii, Khim Geterotsikl Soedin SSSR 1990, 26, 896.
CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY – Vol. 5 (2008) 969
[9] G. Stork, W. A. Burgstahler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5068; A. Eschenmoser, L. Ruzicka, O.
Jeger, D. Arigoni, Helv. Chim. Acta 1955, 38, 1890.
[10] W. S. Johnson, Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1967, 29, 1001; M. Nishizawa, H. Takenaka, Y. Hayashi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 522; M. Nishizawa, H. Takenaka, Y. Hayashi, J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 806.
[11] R. L. Snowden, J.-C. Eichenberger, W. Giersch, W. Thommen, K.-H. Schulte-Elte, Helv. Chim. Acta
1993, 76, 1608.
[12] K. Ishihara, S. Nakamura, H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4906; S. Nakamura, K.
Ishihara, H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8131; K. Ishihara, H. Ishibashi, H. Yamamoto,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3647.
[13] G. Ohloff, F. NQf, R. Decorzant, W. Thommen, E. Sundt, Helv. Chim. Acta 1973, 56, 1414.
[14] J. S. Cowie, P. D. Landor, S. R. Landor, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1973, 720.
[15] R. L. Snowden, J.-C Eichenberger, S. Linder, P. Sonnay, Helv. Chim. Acta 2004, 87, 1711.
[16] G. Ohloff, W. Giersch, W. Pickenhagen, A. Furrer, B. Frei, Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 68, 2022.
[17] L. A. Paquette, R. E. Maleczka Jr., J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 912.
[18] R. L. Snowden, S. Linder, Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 3055.
[19] R. L. Snowden, S. D. Escher, to Firmenich SA, Eur. Pat. EP 558928, 1993 (Chem. Abstr. 1994, 120,
107408).
[20] M. G. Bolster, B. J. M. Jansen, A. de Groot, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5663.
[21] R. L. Snowden, S. Linder, Helv. Chim. Acta 2006, 89, 3071.
[22] M. E. Garst, Y.-F. Cheung, W. S. Johnson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 4404; M. Wolf, U. MQtzel, E.-
J. Brunke, E. Klein, Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 2339.
[23] C. Fehr, I. Farris, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6904.