No.
01
TCK Wire Rope Non-Destructive In-Service
Inspection System
Test Report
Test Property: Wire Rope Flaws Quantitative Test
Test Type: Daily Test
Test Instrument: TCK-BX55
Test Code: 0001
Test Place: Lab
Tested by: TCK Company: TCK
Checked by: Max Date: 8/2/2012
Introduction:
1. This report consists of the main report page (I. Test Report)
and the accessorial pages. The final conclusion of the test should
be made according to conclusion of the main report.
2. The accessorial report consist of “ II. Table of to Flaw
Degrees”, “ III. Table of Flaw Sequence” and “IV. Flaw Curve”.
The accessorial report is mainly to help the test workers to fully
assess main report (I. Test Report), and meanwhile provide more
perspectives for data analysis.
3. The test data and results are derived from TCK Wire Rope
Quantitative Test Equipment, The test data and results are derived
from TCK Wire Rope Quantitative-Inspection System, And test
content is the percentage loss of effective metallic bearing cross-
sectional area on any spot of wire rope.
4. The criteria and ways of expressions of this test are in
compliance with Wire Rope Nondestructive Quantitative In-Service
Inspection Methods and Assessment Rules, and therefore are
different from the traditional visual method.
5. The test especially provides one referential aided tables in the
accessorial test pages: the table of flaw degrees to help the test
staff to fully assess the test results and flaw types.
I. Test Report
Report No.01 No 1 Total3page
Test Type Daily Test Test Instrument TCK-BX55
Test Place Lab Test Code 0001
Quantitative judgment of the loss of wire rope metallic cross-
Test Purpose
sectional area
Percentage loss of effective metallie bearing cross-sectional area on
Test Content
any spot of wire rope
Basic Rope Number 06*19-03.2 Rope Diameter 3.2mm
Date of Rope
Length of lay 0cm 9/10/2011
Installation
Parameters Date of Magnetization 17/1/2012 Date of Test 17/1/2012
TCK Benchmark Equivalent 350 Flaw Upper Limit 10 %
Test Start Point 0 Valid Tested Length 7.14M
Position of Maximum
Maximum Flaw Value 9.35 % 3.33M
Flaw
Total Flaws 6
Conclusion Replace Rope Soon
Note: The conclusion of the test can be divided into the following
grades.
1. When the maximum Flaw value is less than 30% of the Flaw
upper limit, it is graded as Slight. Conclusion: continue to use
2. When the maximum Flaw value is between 30%-60% of the
upper limit,the Flaw is graded as Medium. Conclusion: enhance
Remark maintenance.
3. When the maximum Flaw value is between 60%-80% of the
upper limit,it is graded as Serious. Conclusion: keep close watch.
4. When the maximum Flaw value is more than 80% of the upper
limit but does not exceed the upper limit, the Flaw is graded as
Severe. Conclusion: change recently.
5. When the maximum Flaw value exceeds the upper limit, it is
graded as Over Limit. Conclusion: Stop using.
Append 1
II. Table of Flaw Degrees
Report No.01 No 2 Total3page
Degree of Flaw Quantity of Flaws Remark
Slight 4 15%-30% of Upper Limit
Medium 1 30%-60% of Upper Limit
Serious 0 60%-80% of Upper Limit
Above 80% of Upper Limit and Below
Severe 1
Upper Limit
Over Limit 0 Above or equals to Upper Limit
Conclusion Replace Rope Soon
Defect Upper Limit 10%
Ш. Table of Flaw Type Analysis(For Reference)
Maximum
Type Item Quantity Flaw Position(m)
Equivalent
LF(Type)* 4 3.05 5.40
LMA*
Other* 1 2.69 4.76
Combined* 1 9.35 3.33
Note: This is an accessorial analysis of flaw types.the results of which are accessorial
information to the main test report.The flaw types of wire rope in service are so complicated
that single-type flaws are rarely seen.Therefore ,there will be some difference between the
flaw types derived from the tests and those derived from "Visual tests".Accurate judgements
must be made by referring to the flaw Curve.
LF(Type)*. The typical LF represents the disconnected status of wire/rope. While LF
Type means the flaw detected is of LF feature.its trend or future result is LF.
LMA*.LMA includes several types of flaw,like corrosion,abrasion,etc.
Other*.Here it includes the fatigue,press,hard-fragile,etc,which should not be
identified as LF or LMA.
Combined*.>=2 types of flaw(above mentioned) appears together.
Append2
Ш. Table of Flaw Sequence
Report No.01 No3page Total3page
Flaw Flaw Broken Wire Diameter Contraction
No. Type
Position(m) Value(%) Equivalent Equivalent(mm)
1 3.33 9.35 Combined 11 0.14
2 3.99 1.06 LF 1
3 4.14 2.95 LF 3
4 4.76 2.69 Other 0.04
5 5.40 3.05 LF 3
6 6.09 1.55 LF 2
IV. TCK Curve
