Kuvempu University: Project Report On
Kuvempu University: Project Report On
KUVEMPU UNIVERSITY
                            Project Report on
A STUDY ON CUSTOMER PERCEPTION TOWARDS ONLINE FOOD
 ORDERING APPS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ZOMATO APP
                            IN SHIVAMOGGA CITY
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Award of the Degree In
                                       2019-2020
                            CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that CHANDANA. J.S bearing the Register No. BB178912 of
VI Semester BBA has carried out the Project Work entitled “A Study On
Customer Perception towards Online Food Ordering Apps with special
reference to Zomato App in Shivamogga City” under guidance of
Mr. Vinay Kumar K.S as part of her/his curriculum activity as per the norms
for obtaining Degree in Bachelor of Business Administration from PES Institute
of Advanced Management Studies, Shivamogga during the Academic year
2019-2020.
Place: Shivamogga
 Date:
                        DECLARATION
                                                          CHANDANA. J.S
                                                         Reg. No. BB178912
                                                                VI Semester BBA
Place: Shivamogga
Date:
                    Table of Contents
1. Introduction 01 - 08
                   Company Profile               09 - 24
    2.
Questionnaire
                     Bibliography
                             List of Tables
                           Chapter – 1
                          Introduction
                 1.1 Introduction
                 1.2 Review of Literature
                 1.3 Need for the study
                 1.4 Statement of the Problem
                 1.5 Objectives of the Study
                 1.6 Scope of the Study
                 1.7 Research Methodology
                 1.8 Sources of data collection
                 1.9 Sampling design
                 1.10 Limitations of the study
                                  Introduction
1.1 Introduction
The recent development of the Internet has augmented the e-commerce industries in a
country like India. E-commerce development has made Online food ordering services
seamless for people who want to get food delivered at their doorstep. Although
consumers continue to go out for the meals, consumers feel very convenient to order
food online since it frees the customer from personally visiting the restaurants. In this
study, our main focus was to analyze the perception of consumer towards Online food
ordering services through Zomato.. In order to understand what factors have played a
dominant role to attract consumer in the developing country like India towards them,
we decided to study on the consumer perception on online food ordering app like
Zomato.
In today’s world service sector contributes 64.80% in GDP. Zomato is one of the most
popular applications that provide services to the user to discover restaurants. The rise
of digital technology is reshaping the industries. With the increased use of technology,
the number of people engaging into the digital sector are rapidly increasing. Even
Consumers are accustomed to shopping or even ordering online through apps or
websites, with maximum convenience and transparency, expecting the same
experience that they would get from the outlet itself. To match up with the
consumer’s expectations apps are providing increased facilities and services to the
customers. This scenario doesn’t exist only in one country but all across the globe.
Being up to date with the customers’ expectations helps firm retain customer’s to a
greater extent.
Zomato is an online discovery guide for restaurants, bars, pubs and clubs and for dine-
outs. The registered users are required to post reviews and rate (on a scale of 1 - 5
stars) the restaurants on the basis of their choice, visit and experience. The website
helps in defining the restaurant/pub/club on the basis of presence or absence of air
conditioning, smoking area, WiFi Internet, stag entry, live performances and outdoor
seating or whether non-vegetarian food and alcohol are served or not. Zomato also
aim was to investigate the student‟s perception, behavior and satisfaction of online
food ordering and delivery services. Their study reveals that online food purchasing
services help the students in managing their time better. It is also found that ease of
availability of their desired food at any time and at the same time easy access to
internet are the prime reasons for using the services.
Leong Wai Hong (2016), “Food Ordering System Using Mobile Phone” stated
thatthe technological advancement in many industries have changed the business
model to grow. Efficient systems can help improve the productivity and profitability
of a restaurant. The use of online food delivery system is believed that it can lead the
restaurant‟s business grow from time to time and will help the restaurants to facilitate
major business online.
Hong Lan, et al, (2016), “Improvement of Online Food Delivery Service Based on
Consumers‟ Negative Comments” stated that online food delivery market is immature
yet; there are some obvious problems that can be seen from consumers‟ negative
comments. In order to solve these problems, we can neither rely merely on the self-
discipline of online food delivery restaurants nor the supervision and management of
online food delivery platforms. Only by taking laws as the criterion, with the joined
efforts of the online food delivery platforms and restaurants, the government
departments concerned, consumers and all parties in the society, can these problems
be solved and a good online take away environment can be created.
Varsha Chavan, et al, (2015), in their study about “Implementing Customizable
Online Food Ordering System Using Web Based Application” the use of smart device
based interface for customers to view, order and navigate has helped the restaurants in
managing orders from customers immediately. The capabilities of wireless
communication and smart phone technology in fulfilling and improving business
management and service delivery. Their analysis states that this system is convenient,
effective and easy to use, which is expected to improve the overall restaurant business
in coming times.
Serhat Murat Alagoz & Haluk Hekimoglu (2012), “Customer Perceptions of
Electronic Food Ordering” in their stated that e-commerce is rapidly growing
worldwide, the food industry is also showing a steady growth. In this research paper
they have used the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a ground to study the
acceptance of online food ordering system. Their data analysis revealed that the
attitude towards online food ordering vary according to the ease and usefulness of
online food ordering process and also vary according to their innovativeness against
information technology, their trust in eretailers and various external influences.
Sheryl E. Kimes (2011), “Customer Perceptions of Electronic Food Ordering” his
study found that perceived control and perceived convenience associated with the
online food ordering services were important for both users and non-users. Non-users
need more personal interaction and also had higher technology anxiety to use the
services.
Researchers have keenly observed that people sometimes are not willing to spend
hours to enjoy good food at the restaurants. So, he was curious to know whether such
apps can help customers to change their perception about the dining experience
Biggest challenge Zomato is facing under Zomato Order in India is the delivery. They
don’t have their own delivery system like Swiggy & Runnr. Thought they are
providing deliveries with their on invested Grab but they are also failing in service.
QSR & Only delivery merchants are getting more orders from Zomato but only issue
they are facing is in delivering it and it’s spoiling the brand of merchants also. I think
they need to look into their delivery services which will be prompt and to rely on. To
overcome with issues present study is conducted
      To study the customer perception towards Online Food Ordering app Zomato.
      To determine the motivating factor for purchasing the product through
       Zomato.
      To find out the expectations of the customers while ordering food from
       Zomato App.
Scope of the study is limited towards those customers who have experienced such
online food delivery services through Zomato app in Shivamogga City. The study is
basically conducted to know how consumers perceive the online food delivery
services. The perception of consumers may vary under different circumstances. From
this study, we can have a better understanding of the Online Food Delivery Service
Market. We will know about the consumer perception regarding the services they
provide in Shivamogga area and will get to know the variables affecting their
perception. Therefore, these findings may help the service providers to work upon on
these variables to fill up the gaps in the mindset of consumers. The survey was
conducted in different areas of Shivamogga and around 100 responses were collected
Primary Data
Primary data has been used by me in the form of Questionnaire & Observation, which
are the two basic methods of collecting primary data, which suffices all research
objectives.
Secondary data
Secondary data sources like catalogue of the company, product range book of the
company, various internet sites and Literature Reviews have been used.
The research was designed to achieve the above mentioned objectives and the
following tools were used to collect the required data.
Sampling Size
The sample size for the consumer’s survey is 50.
Sampling Method
The Convenience sampling method was adopted for the study with a sample size of
100 respondents from the customers. Convenience sampling techniques has been
usedto select the respondents. Sample design is non probability sampling design.
Sampling Frame
The sample frame represents the groups of respondents that were contacted during the
survey it also represents the profession of the respondents that were connected for
data.
Tools For Statistical Analysis
Structured Questionnaires were the tools for data collection. The Questionnaire was
neatly designed and constructed for the purpose in line with the objective of the study.
Analyze the data and interpret the results by using percentage analysis and ranking.
simple Percentage Method.
                           Chapter – 2
                         Company Profile
           2.1 Introduction
           2.2 History
           2.3 Vision and Mission Statement
           2.4 Investments
           2.5 Acquisitions
           2.6 Key People/Management at Zomato
           2.7 Swot Analysis
           2.8 Marketing Mix of Zomato – Zomato Marketing Mix
           2.9 Marketing Strategy of Zomato
           2.10 Competitors
                             Company Profile
2.1 Introduction
2.2 History
Zomato was founded as Foodiebay in 2008. It was renamed Zomato in 2010. In 2011,
Zomato expanded across India to Delhi NCR, Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Pune and
Kolkata. Subsequently, in 2012, the company expanded operations internationally in
several countries like the United Arab Emirates, Sri Lanka, Qatar, the United
Kingdom, the Philippines, and South Africa. In 2013, Zomato was launched in New
Zealand, Turkey, Brazil and Indonesia, with its website and apps available in Turkish,
Brazilian Portuguese, Indonesian and English languages. Further in April 2014,
Zomato launched its services in Portugal, followed by launches in Canada, Lebanon
and Ireland in the same year.
The acquisition of Seattle-based food portal Urbanspoon marked the firm's entry into
the United States, Canada and Australia, and brought it into direct competition with
Yelp, Zagat and OpenTable.
With the introduction of .xxx domains in 2011, Zomato also launched zomato.xxx, a
site dedicated to food porn. It later launched a print version of the website content
named "Citibank Zomato Restaurant Guide" in collaboration with Citibank in May
2012, but it has since been discontinued.
With its cloud kitchen, the company aimed to help restaurants to expand their
presence without incurring any fixed costs. Later in September 2017, Zomato claimed
that the company had "turned profitable" in the 24 countries operated in and
announced that the "zero commission model" to be introduced for partner restaurants.
Towards the end of 2017, Zomato stopped accepting updates from its active users by
not utilising moderators to verify and make updates. Restaurant information was not
updated. Users of the app reported issues with new features to pay for orders.
Zomato narrowed down its losses by 34% to ₹389 Cr[clarification needed] for the
financial year 2016–17, from ₹590.1 Cr crore[clarification needed] in the previous
year 2015-16.
In September 2019, Zomato fired the highest number (541 people) of employees
almost 10% of workforce working on back end activities like customer service,
merchant and delivery partner support functions.
We want to be the ‘Google’ of food. Our vision is to be the global platform when
someone is looking for food locally.
Mission Statement
Tagline:
Goals
Values
Resilience
We push ourselves beyond our abilities when faced with tough times. When we
foresee uncertainty, we address it only with flexibility.
Acceptance
Feedback is never taken personally, we break it into positive pieces and strive to work
on each and every element even more effectively.
Ownership
People here don’t work ‘for’ Zomato, they work ‘with’ Zomato. We treat every
problem as our own, take accountability and drive the change.
Humility
It’s always ‘us’ over ‘me’. We don’t lose ourselves in pride or confidence during
individual successes, but focus on being our simple selves in every which way.
Spark
We believe in, stand for and are evangelists of our culture - both, within Zomato and
externally with all our stakeholders.
Judgment
It’s not our abilities that show who we truly are - it’s our choices. We aim to get these
right, at least in the majority of the cases.
2.4 Investments
Between 2010-13, Zomato raised approximately US$16.7 million from Info Edge
India, giving them a 57.9% stake in Zomato. In November 2013, it raised an
additional US$37 million from Sequoia Capital and Info Edge India.
In November 2014, Zomato completed another round of funding of US$60 million at
a post-money valuation of ~US$660 million. This round of funding was being led
jointly by Info Edge India and Vy Capital, with participation from Sequoia Capital.
While in April 2015, Info Edge India, Vy Capital and Sequoia Capital led another
round of funding for US$50 million. This was followed by another US$60 million
funding led by Temasek, a Singapore government-owned investment company, along
with Vy Capital in September.
In October 2018, Zomato raised $210 million from Alibaba's payment affiliate Ant
Financial. Ant Financial received an ownership stake of over 10% of the company as
part of the round, which valued Zomato at around $2 billion. Zomato had also raised
an additional $150 million also from Ant Financial earlier in 2018
2.5 Acquisitions
Zomato has acquired 12 startups globally. In July 2014, Zomato made its first
acquisition by buying Menu-mania for an undisclosed sum. The company pursued
other acquisitions such as lunchtime.cz and obedovat.sk for a combined US$3.25
million. In September 2014, Zomato acquired Poland-based restaurant search service
Gastronauci for an undisclosed sum. Three months later, it acquired Italian restaurant
search service Cibando.
Zomato also acquired Seattle-based food portal Urbanspoon for an estimated $60
million in 2015. Other acquisitions of 2015 include Mekanist in an all-cash deal, the
Delhi-based startup MapleGraph that built MaplePOS (renamed as Zomato Base, and
NexTable, a US-based table reservation and restaurant management platform.)
In 2016, the company acquired Sparse Labs, a logistics technology startup and the
food delivery startup, Runnr, in 2017.
Zomato is the restaurant discovery app and website by Infoedge. Because of its
unique design and user-friendliness, Zomato is loved by its users. The brand has
spread fast across the world. Here is the SWOT analysis of Zomato.
Strengths in the SWOT analysis of Zomato
First mover advantage – One of the best competitive advantages of Zomato is that it
is the first mover in many of the nations where it is establishing itself. Directories and
other forms of restaurant ratings might exist. But as an app Zomato is excellent and
many countries (like India) have loved the usability of the Zomato app.
Evergreen industry – The restaurant industry is an evergreen industry. Sure, there
may be recessions and other downturns which might affect the industry. But overall,
this industry is going to stick around at all times and is only going to grow with rising
disposable income.
Fast Expansion – It is appreciative that Zomato has expanded so fast. It is already in
24 countries and is expanding year on year.
Fantastic design of the app – Zomato has regularly won awards for its app design
and for its user-friendliness. The App design is fantastic and it helps you discover
restaurants nearby as well as in an area you are going to visit.
Number of users – Zomato has a huge number of users using their app. At the same
time, the site also has 90 million visitors a month approximately. With so many users
following the app and site, there are more reviews and hence more chances to find
better restaurants.
Focused approach – The brand has a very focused approach and has always tried to
bring the most of out of its unique offering. It is well connected with restaurants and
regularly takes feedback from customers as well as restaurants. This focused approach
has also helped the brand image and reputation of the firm.
Excellent funding available – Zomato has picked multiple rounds of funding over
the years and because it is now so well established in many countries, there is a lot of
funding available for the app.
Multiple acquisitions – Zomato has acquired multiple companies most of which are
software or technology related.
Already turning profits – In April 2017, Zomato was profitable in all 24 countries it
was operating in. For a company which is a start-up and has so much funding, it is a
big thing to turn profitable because many funded organizations are still declaring
losses even after a decade of establishment.
Brand Equity – Zomato is valued at $1.4 billion within 7 years of inception. That
says volumes about the popularity and love for the brand.
Fantastic marketing – You can find Zomato working for its own marketing offline
as well as online. Its print ads are hilarious and make an immediate connect with the
audience. It is strong on Social media marketing and uses a combination of ATL and
BTL strategies to attract and retain customers.
Weaknesses in the SWOT analysis of Zomato
Security issues for the app – A major issue for Zomato in the past has been some
security issues due to which the app was hacked and at least 17 million users data was
copied. Such security issues are a nightmare for internet companies.
Still a lot of expansion required – Considering that the app has established in 24
countries, there is good expansion. But at the same time, the app has been started 7
years back and with the amount of funding available for Zomato, the expansion can
be much faster. It is allowing other services to establish themselves in this niche
before it reaches their country.
Word of mouth and Facebook check-ins – Besides such apps, in many places word
of mouth still trumps apps and at the same time, Facebook check-ins are a strong
competitor wherein people might not need Zomato. Thus, it is an app for early
adopters but definitely not for laggards.
Opportunities in the SWOT analysis of Zomato
Further expansion – The number 1 opportunity for Zomato is to expand to more
countries and establish its base faster. Service industry has a major problem that
services can be copied very fast and very easily. As a result, it is critical for Zomato to
establish and expand itself faster.
More acquisitions – There are and were many small players in this space. Zomato
can acquire several of its competitors and at the same time, it has to keep an eye on
the tech industry and acquire any tech innovation it can get its hands on to keep on
rising.
Cloud restaurants – Zomato is coming up with the concept of Cloud restaurants
wherein restaurants will not have to get a physical space to actually sell their
food products. Instead, they can sell from Zomato.
Creating a community – Zomato does have a huge following but the users do not
interact with each other. Creating a forum and a community out of the users already
following Zomato can be a huge benefit for the brand.
Adoption of the internet and Smartphones – There is a huge increase in the
adoption of Internet across developing and underdeveloped countries as well.
Similarly, adoption of smartphone has also increased. Thus more and more orders and
research about restaurants can happen online instead of through physical visits.
Threats in the SWOT analysis of Zomato
Google’s schema module – One of the major threats Zomato faces right now is the
Schema module of Google wherein google locations itself is getting in restaurant
recommendations. Even google homepage shows the google maps page where you
can search for restaurants within your locality. Google being such a big brand, zomato
faces huge competition from them.
Market followers and challengers – In the service industry, it is very easy to replicate
the success of another service product or offering. Similarly, marketing followers and
challengers can slowly take away the market share of Zomato.
Zomato is an online restaurant search & discovery service provider that was founded
by Pankaj Chaddah and his accomplice Deepinder Goyal in the year 2008. The firm
has grown within a short time to become present in about 23 countries by now.
Formerly known as Foodiebay, the company was renamed to Zomato in 2010 after
which Smartphone applications were introduced in 2011.
Product in the Marketing Mix of Zomato :
Zomato provides its users with restaurant search information and reviews that will
enable one to make an informed decision in regard to the choice of restaurant. Menu
images are offered to customers, especially for those restaurants that aren’t running
their own websites.
Their slogan “Never have a bad meal” has truly been proven right by the company’s
ability to help its users secure the right restaurants for their needs. In general, their
services include POS Systems, Restaurant Search & Discovery, Whitelabel Apps,
Table Reservations & Management and online ordering services. The company lists at
least 1.5 million restaurants across the almost 25 countries where it is present
Other products include the food porn, which is offered in the Zomato.xxx as well as
“Citibank Zomato Restaurant Guide”- a print version of its website content which it
launched in 2012 in collaboration with India’s largest bank Citibank. This print
version has however been discontinued.
Price in the Marketing Mix of Zomato :
Zomato doesn’t charge restaurants for putting their restaurant information on the
Zomato page. However, it doesn’t mean that the restaurants won’t ultimately pay
anything. There are three basic revenue generation avenues or sources namely:
advertisements (sponsor ads & banner ads), restaurant booking and event ticketing
Event ticketing is where tickets for special events are sold through the site basically
for large scale events or parties. Restaurant booking or online ordering is charged at
between 7.5% and 15% of the sales depending on the priority category of the
restaurant.
Zomato is restaurant search and discovery and deliver business and was founded by
Deepinder Goyal and Pankaj Chaddah in the year 2008. Zomato currently operates in
more than 24 countries. Initially, it started under the name Foodiebay which was later
changed into Zomato in the year 2010.
Zomato has also expanded overseas to Sri Lanka, Qatar, Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia,
etc. Zomato also claimed that it turned profitable in all 24 countries it operates in. In
February 2017, Zomato introduced its zero commission model in a partner restaurant.
SmartTech magazine announced that Zomato was among the top 25 most promising
internet companies and has been getting regular investments from Info Edge India.
Segmentation targeting and positioning in the Marketing strategy Zomato
Segmentation :
Under the demographic segmentation strategy, Zomato targets the age 18-
35. People who want to dine out and want to research the restaurants they wish to
visit. Zomato has found a larger target segment in the working professionals who
want to dine out and also want to get food delivered at their doorstep.
Zomato has also entered the experiential events segment and had launched the multi-
city food and entertainment carnival called Zealand. Zomato believes that there is an
experience that is needed to be built around food and Zomato has played a significant
role in making that happen.
It intends to launch new products and business lines centered on food in both dine out
and delivery segment.
Target:
The main target customer of Zomato is the youth who are between the ages 18-35 and
people who often want to eat out with their friends and colleagues. It targets those
customers who often refer to ratings and reviews and want to take a decision if the
place is good.
It is those customers who are seeking to have a good time with their friends and want
to be assured that the place is going to worth the price. It also targets the foodie
who wants to experience food and share it with people.
These people also want to know where they get the best foods in town and visit those
restaurants. The consumption target is all the online opinion seekers of restaurants.
Positioning:
Zomato has positioned itself as a platform that brings restaurants, suppliers,
consumers, food suppliers, and logistics partners together. It aims to create a world
where detailed food consumption and taste patterns across the globe and share that
intelligently with the suppliers.
Zomato is an Indian youth’s go-to-app when it comes to dining out. It has become a
mandate now to check reviews and recommendations before visiting a restaurant and
Zomato is positioned as the app they should look for when it comes to looking for
authentic reviews.
With the launch of Zomato Gold, it has made dining out pocket-friendly for its
customers.
Distribution in the Marketing strategy of Zomato
Zomato revealed that about 40% of the total sales were referral driven. According to
Zomato, almost 30% of the subscribers are coming through referrals and more than $2
Million orders have been made using Z coins. Zomato cross-sells its several offerings
to a customer which has brought huge success as Zomato is able to capture the
customers are any phase.
According to Zomato, customer acquisition cost is very low. Zomato claims that of
the 1.4 million listings it gets, 150,000 are from India and sees 22 million users come
on board every month. Zomato Gold is another program that is referral driven, where
on sharing their referral code, a customer gets a month of the Zomato Gold
services extended.
Brand equity in the Marketing strategy Zomato
The name Zomato has become a synonym for food and restaurants. It has become so
popular among the consumers that they have reached 21 million monthly run rate and
it claims to be a market leader when it comes to food delivery as well. Zomato has
been able to show strong growth because the users are not using Zomato for
discounts, they are using it for convenience.
To have easy access to food and get reliable information about restaurants. When it
comes to dining out, more than 70% of the customers check the reviews in the app.
Zomato has already laid strong foundations and has huge potential growth because of
its good brand name.
Competitive advantage in the Marketing strategy Zomato
Strategy:
Zomato creates innovative schemes that keep the customers engaged. The Zomato
Gold which is an exclusive membership loyalty program that gives customers an
exclusive dine out and drinking membership with BOGO( Buy One, Get One) and
2+2 complimentary drinks.
The Zomato Gold now has more than 600,000 customers. This has helped customers
to dine out more often, which according to restaurants has helped drive customer
traffic at a higher rate. Gold has made dining out more affordable than it ever used to
be.
The Zomaland which was an experience-driven around food, creating a carnival of
food and music. This strategy to turn food into experience has worked in favor of
Zomato.
Strong Brand Name:
A good brand name is a must when comes to surviving in the industry and Zomato
has been effectively creating a brand name that resonates trust and convenience.
There has been the number of entrants in this market like Food Panda and Uber eats
but they will have to work extensively on their brand value in order to be able to
compete with Zomato.
It has been able to constantly innovate across different verticals and has ensured to
build on the advantage that they have created.
Focus on technology:
The biggest advantage Zomato has over its customers is its beautifully designed User
interface. It is attractive and very easy to browse and this has helped create a pint
of differentiation from its competitors.
The speed with which the website opens and the mobile application is also extremely
fast and extremely easy to use, even for a novice. Zomato gives a lot of focus and
effort in creating a convincing UI for its customers. Zomato has amazingly used data
science and has been able to crave its way for success.
Zomato has been able to obtain a competitive edge because it is extremely data-
driven. It has been able to drive operational and commercial efficiencies like delivery
time prediction, logistics optimization, ad delivery, and supply prioritization.
Zomato aims to implement the concept of cloud kitchen, which will help a restaurant
to expand its presence without incurring any fixed cost. The focus on Zomato
on technology will help it stay ahead of the competition.
Competitive analysis in the Marketing strategy of Zomato
The food industry is highly competitive with most of the companies doing extremely
good in the market. Google Maps as well includes listing of restaurants in the
neighborhood including reviews, photos, and ratings.
One main advantage Zomato has over Google Maps is that Maps has not started menu
listing. Zomato is still a customer’s favorite restaurant discovery tool. The main
competitor of Zomato is Swiggy when it comes to food delivery space, because of its
extremely well-designed logistics capabilities, it is giving good competition to
Zomato
Foodpanda had a first mover’s advantage as it launched an online order facility much
earlier than Zomato thus cause Zomato to lose the relevant market share. Burrp! Is
another important competitor or Zomato, because of its expansion from restaurant
listing to retails and events outlets, the company’s focus has been distributed but
Zomato has been stuck to its core functions.
Another competitor of Zomato is Uber Eats and it gets about 3.5-4 million orders per
month. Uber Eats and FoodPanda’s acquisition by Ola has further shaken the market.
Zomato will have to continuously innovate and evolve to stay ahead of the
competition.
Promotion Strategy:
Zomato is one of the few companies to have been successful in the content market
and uses images to promote its products. Zomato ensures that its contents stay fresh
and has invested vastly on SME’s and SEOs.
Another important role is played by social media and it has helped Zomato become
more popular among its customers. All the promotions made by Zomato proves that
the company chooses to stick to the niche and understands exactly who it is catering
to.
Zomato’s Zomaland festival turned to be a great strategy for Zomato to promote its
services and it was able to turn food into a carnival with music, dance, and stand-up
comedies. Zomato uses the number of strategies like discounts and promo codes to
make more customers use the platform.
2.10 Competitors
         JustEat
         Foodpanda
         Burrp
                           Chapter – 3
                  Conceptual Frame Work
           3.1 Introduction
           3.2 The shape of the market today
           3.3 Two levels of online food delivery
           3.4 The new-delivery opportunity
           3.5 Customer behavior
           3.6 The Evolution of Online Food Delivery Business
           3.7 Types of food delivery app monetization
           3.8 Top Ten Online Food Delivery Apps
      Food delivery apps are certainly one of the vital apps that any food lover will
       have on you “Love” food. You literally wait for your next meal. Well, you are
       not the only one. There are millions of foodies who just incorporate food into
       their lifestyle.
      Nowadays, there are tons of useful mobile apps that are literally dedicated to
       food. Right from piling up recipes, watching someone cook to ordering food
       online, there are food delivery apps for every foodie.
      Online food-delivery platforms are expanding choice and convenience,
       allowing customers to order from a wide array of restaurants with a single of
       their mobile phone
The business of delivering restaurant meals to the home is undergoing rapid change as
new online platforms race to capture markets and customers across the Americas,
Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Although these new Internet platforms are
attracting considerable investment and high valuations—already, five are valued at
more than $1 billion—little real knowledge about market dynamics, growth potential,
or customer behavior exists. Research from McKinsey, based on a six-month study
covering 16 countries around the globe, provides insight into this fast-changing
market.
Worldwide, the market for food delivery stands at €83 billion, or 1 percent of the total
food market and 4 percent of food sold through restaurants and fast-food chains. It has
already matured in most countries, with an overall annual growth rate estimated at just
3.5 percent for the next five years.
By far, the most common form of delivery is the traditional model, in which the
consumer places an order with the local pizza parlor or Chinese restaurant (although
many other kinds of restaurants, particularly in urban areas, now offer delivery) and
waits for the restaurant to bring the food to the door. This traditional category has a 90
percent market share, and most of those orders—almost three-quarters—are still
placed by phone.
However, as in so many other sectors, the rise of digital technology is reshaping the
market. Consumers accustomed to shopping online through apps or websites, with
maximum convenience and transparency, increasingly expect the same experience
when it comes to ordering dinner.
Two types of online platforms have risen to fill that void. The first type is the
“aggregators,” which emerged roughly 15 years ago; the second is the “new delivery”
players, which appeared in 2013. Both allow consumers to compare menus, scan and
post reviews, and place orders from a variety of restaurants with a single click. The
aggregators, which are part of the traditional-delivery category, simply take orders
from customers and route them to restaurants, which handle the delivery themselves.
In contrast, the new-delivery players build their own logistics networks, providing
delivery for restaurants that don’t have their own drivers.
Aggregators
Aggregators build on the traditional model for food delivery, offering access to
multiple restaurants through a single online portal. By logging in to the site or the app,
consumers can quickly compare menus, prices, and reviews from peers. The
aggregators collect a fixed margin of the order, which is paid by the restaurant, and
the restaurant handles the actual delivery. There is no additional cost to the consumer.
With their asset-light model, aggregators post earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margins of 40 to 50 percent. Although
investment continues to pour in (Delivery Hero and Foodpanda, for example, both
attracted €100 million in new investment in 2015), most of the consolidation in this
subcategory has already occurred. Four players—Delivery Hero, Foodpanda,
GrubHub, and Just Eat—have achieved global scale. These four players tend to focus
on different regions. On a national level, there are typically two or three competitors
that dominate, mostly driven by their ability to build a large user base. Consolidation
is advanced in most markets and will likely continue. McKinsey research shows that
just 26 percent of traditional-delivery orders are made online today, but we expect this
share to increase rapidly.
New delivery
Just like the aggregators, new-delivery players allow consumers to compare offerings
and order meals from a group of restaurants through a single website or app.
Crucially, the players in this category also provide the logistics for the restaurant. This
allows them to open a new segment of the restaurant market to home delivery: higher-
end restaurants that traditionally did not deliver. The new-delivery players are
compensated by the restaurant with a fixed margin of the order, as well as with a
small flat fee from the customer. Despite the higher costs of maintaining delivery
vehicles and drivers, the new-delivery players achieve EBITDA margins of more than
30 percent. Players include brands that operate globally such as Deliveroo and
Foodora, which are continuing to capture new regions. We believe the addressable
market for new delivery will reach more than €20 billion by 2025.
Both aggregators and new-delivery players have attracted significant investment,
allowing them to advertise widely and build recognition for their brands quickly.
GrubHub and Just Eat, for example, each reported marketing budgets of about €70
million in 2015. Since there is no limit to the number of restaurants these platforms
can sign up, once they enter a market, they can grow rapidly (see sidebar, “The new-
delivery business model.”)
The growth in new delivery is driven by two sources of consumer demand. This first
is as a substitution for dining in a restaurant. With new delivery, consumers can dine
at home with the same quality food they would enjoy at a fine restaurant. Some
platforms even include Michelin-starred establishments in their offerings in selected
cities. The second source of demand is as a substitution for meals prepared and
consumed at home.
The online food delivery market is no longer the underdog but has evolved into a
champion. Having a food ordering and delivery platform was considered a state-of-
the-art innovation in the early 2000s but today the segment has expanded to different
demographics across the globe.
As more Millenials jump of the online ordering bandwagon the food delivery market
size continues to evolve at a steady pace. And as more players continue to proliferate
this segment we are becoming witness to some fresh online food ordering trends.
Online orders by tweet, virtual assistants, smartwatches, cars, television screens and
even through your own eyes are now a part of this eCommerce segment. But the
innovations don’t stop there. That’s just how you can place your order. What about
the ways these orders are delivered?
The modern-day delivery option includes good old delivery by a person or these crazy
alternatives — delivery by robots, pizza drones, and parachutes. Yes, you heard it
right — a parachute!
And the food delivery business has not just improved the way food is delivered but it
has also created a level playing field for the underdogs that operate through virtual
kitchens. And with an ecosystem that brings vendors together, entrepreneurs are also
doing their bit for society by introducing the likes of food waste apps.
The operations of an online food delivery marketplace are divided into two basic
models. First, the food ordering only model — Aggregators — and second the food
ordering and delivery management model — Delivery Providers. Let’s refresh our
memory by understanding the definition of each in a few lines.
      Aggregators: They are the food ordering (only) businesses that negotiate with
       the vendors and display their listings on their respective platforms. They
       receive the orders from customers and route it to the featured restaurants.
      Delivery Providers: These fleets of delivery teams are united by an Uber-like
       app to receive orders. Once an order is placed, it is forwarded to the featured
       restaurants and the delivery team proceeds to deliver it to the customers.
Aggregators
The traditional Aggregators followed a very simple approach. It was as follows:
      Visit potential participating vendors
      Present a partnership plan
      Establish an association
      Do some branding and marketing to attract customers
While some outlets maintain their own fleet of riders to deliver food, outsourcing the
delivery services seems to be a preferred approach by majority partners. It is more
cost-efficient and has been created while taking local market dynamics into
consideration.
A Life Beyond Standard Delivery Models
But the delivery scenario innovations don’t stop here. Not by a long shot. Every new
entrant into the market brings something new to the table and over the past few years
we have seen some notable improvements in the business model. Some of them
include:
      Cuisine/restaurant-style design layouts
      Menus displayed in real-time
      Push notifications in mobile-apps
      Option to create user profiles
      Live order tracking and hassle-free delivery
And if this doesn’t satisfy your hunger for innovation in food deliveries then don’t
frown, here is another interesting update. You can also order a pizza through a pizza
vending machine and get custom-made pizzas in a matter of minutes.
Surprised? Don’t be. Pizza ATMs are a real thing and following in the footsteps are
vending machines for Omelettes. So, while these machines won’t deliver the pizza or
omelette to your door-step, you will be able to go out and grab those dishes without
the frequent wait and at your own convenience.
“It is expected that online food delivery market will reach $23.5 billion by 2025.”
The World Loves to Order Food Online
According to a whitepaper published by Sesame token, the global food ordering and
delivery sector stands at $95.64 billion and it is a mere 1% of the total food market. If
that doesn’t make you want to start an online food ordering and delivery business then
what else will?
Despite the fact that this segment has experienced significant growth in many
countries, there are still new demographics to cater to, new niches within the niche
can be created and the world is always open for some new ideas.
Want more evidence? Well, if we talk about the overall food ordering market, about
42% of the orders are placed online. Which means you have a clear chance of
capturing a good market share and leverage the advancements today to attract the
remaining 58% of the users to your brand. In addition to that, the food sector
collectively has an annual growth rate of about 3.7% and interestingly, the online food
ordering and delivery segment is growing at an annual rate of 15-20%.
Need more information? Here are some interesting facts for you:
      The US food delivery market alone is expected to grow by 79% in the next 5
       years.
      Food ordering and delivery business is expected to grow by $30 billion (from
       $43 billion in 2017 to $76 billion in 2022) at an annual growth rate of 12%
       over the next five years
      Apart from the millenials, online ordering and delivery is also becoming a
       favorite among the users in the age group of 35-44
      The top five players in this sector have a combined valuation of $11.52 billion.
Phew! That’s a lot of potential and an untapped one. There is no better time than the
present to get on the online food ordering and delivery bandwagon. And it’s not even
that tough to get started. Why? Because you can start a website and mobile app
instantly using platforms like Yo!Yumm — an out-of-the-box solution to create food
ordering and delivery platforms.
Success of an Online Food Ordering Business — Customer Retention!
That’s right. Customer retention is the most important factor in keeping any business
afloat and resonates with profitability. Just try to count how many times you have
been to your favorite restaurant or how many times you asked a friend to come along
or recommended them the place.
Tough to recognize, right? Believe it or not, you are a repeat customer here and you
have contributed immensely in your favorite restaurant’s growth via word-of-mouth
marketing.
Maybe it’s time you got a paycheck from them for your unwavering support or maybe
a couple of free meals should be a good compensation.
Anyways, jokes apart. Online food ordering and delivery business is no different. If
you start your own marketplace then you won’t be able to go far without a loyal and
happy customer base. So, why is investing time and effort in customer retention
important? Let’s find out.
      More repeat sales: A joint study by BIA & Kelsey states that retained
       customers spend 67% more on your platform as compared to new customers.
      Higher revenues and profits: According to a research conducted at Harvard
       Business School, a mere 5% increase in customer retention can help you raise
       profits upto 95%. How? They use your platform to order regularly and this
       helps in increasing revenues significantly.
      Word of mouth marketing: According to a strategy research report by
       Accenture, 55% of the loyal customers are likely to recommend your brand to
       their friends and family. So, from a loyal customer you have at least 10 more
       potential customers. This is the true power of word of mouth marketing.
To Wrap Up
With all the extensive information about aggregators, delivery providers and the
perfect hack for an online food ordering business you should be able to create a plan
for your own venture.
You can start building your business website and app with the help of an in-house
team or you can play smart and opt for a ready-made and customizable platform like
Yo!Yumm to have your website and mobile app up and running in no time.
Leverage the huge potential that the online food ordering and delivery business has to
offer and take the right steps to become the next market leader. We wish you success
with your new entrepreneurial journey.
Delivery charges
If a restaurant doesn’t have its own delivery team, such kind of an app can take care
of delivery for a fee. Delivery fees can be a percentage of the order price or a flat fee
depending on distance.
DoorDash From $0.99 to $7.99 plus a service fee of 7–15% per order
Caviar From $1.99 to $8.99 plus a service fee of 18% on all orders
Let’s consider one more way to make money with food delivery apps. This
monetization approach involves a delivery surcharge during peak hours. For example,
UberEats sets surge pricing during lunch and dinner. At peak hours, UberEats limits
menus and locations and charges an extra fee to make them available. To see how
successful this approach can be, look at the graph below that shows the average
UberEats income per delivery by city.
Below you can see some interesting statistics about the food industry.
There are also alternative ways to make money with food delivery apps:
      Third-party advertising
      Allowing restaurants to list their services through the food delivery app for a
       fixed monthly fee
      Charging extra for delivery during bad weather conditions
      App homepage advertising
      Extra fee for rush delivery
      Extra fee for businesses that want to open a restaurant using the mobile app
Key Features:
      Get access to all favourite local restaurants
      Even beer, wine or spirits are delivered at your door via this app
      Enables grocery and home essentials shopping
      Other than food orders, they provide options like wash & fold, dry cleaning
      Can save the address, payment details, order history, etc. for quick reordering
      Available in 100+ cities across the US including Los Angeles, San Francisco,
       NYC, Washington DC, Philadelphia, Chicago, Boston, etc.
Essential Features:
      Get amazing deals sponsored by both Swiggy and restaurants
      Live track your food delivery right from the moment you place your order
      Multiple payment option available
3. Zomato (Android, iOS)
Discover the best and nearest restaurants either to eat out or order in from. Check
through restaurant photos, menus, and customer reviews and ratings to decide where
you want to eat your next meal. The app runs across UAE, Philippines, and India.
Essential Features:
      Easy search for restaurants, pubs, cafes, and more by location and cuisine
Essential Features:
      Pay easily with your existing Uber account
      Track your order in real time
      Nearest or farthest, order from anywhere
5. McDelivery (Android, iOS)
From healthy meals to happy meals, McDonald’s serves best and fresh food that will
always find ways to show commitment to customers and the food they deliver.
Users can use this app to pick out your favourite item and even add deals and offers if
available. The app automatically detects the user’s proximity to any of the nearby
restaurant location, thus making ordering much easier.
Essential Features:
      Discover delicious McDonald’s deals
      See local menu prices, deals, order your favourites and pay online
      Users can get news, offers & promotions delivered right to your inbox
      Find your closest McDonald’s store
6. Yelp (Android, iOS)
With more than 130 million restaurant options across the globe, Yelp is considerably
one of the biggest and preferred food apps for foodies. If you are new to the city, then
Yelp is your food guide to finding the right places from breakfast to dinner.
Essential Features:
      Easily find the nearest and top-rated restaurants
      Book a table wherever and whenever you want
      Get amazing deals on food and drinks
Essential Features:
      Deliver traditional takeaway and more
      Largest food network with around 290,000+ restaurant partners
      Assured choice, convenience, reliability, and quality
      Convenient ordering and payment
      Operates in 39 markets globally
8. Foodpanda (Android, iOS)
Foodpanda is one of the largest food delivery apps and serves in more than 50
countries. With more than 15000 restaurant options, Foodpanda brings a lot of variety
of cuisines to the customers’ tables such as Mexican, Chinese, Thai, Continental, etc.
Essential Features:
      Choose from the best restaurants nearby you
      Widest variety of cuisines
      Get access to live status updates to track your food
9. Whole Foods Market (Android, iOS)
Make life simpler, healthier with the new Whole Foods Market app where you can
browse dishes, save recipes, get filters for special diets; create shopping lists and
much more. This app serves to be an incredibly useful app to find all organic and
vegan food needs from the nearest stores.
Essential Features:
      Display offers and items on sale
      It’s an American supermarket chain that sells products free from hydrogenated
       fats, artificial colours, flavours, preservatives, etc.
      Get access to more than 3800 recipes that every user would love to try
      Prime members of the app receive better deals and offers
10. Takeaway.com (Android, iOS)
Using your smartphone or tablet order food online with ease. Get best offers and order
from thousands of restaurants around you. Users can order pizza, meals, pasta,
Chinese or Indian takeaways in just a few clicks.
Essentials Features:
      Map view features available for all listed restaurants
      Safety payment with credit, debit or even PayPal
      Consist of a wide selection of cuisines
      Users can create filters for distance, popularity, newest restaurants, price,
       product, etc.
      Available in 4 languages including Dutch, English, French & German.
                           Chapter - 4
           Analysis of data and interpretation
                         Tables
                         Graphs
                         Interpretations
51
50
 49
                                                             48
 48
47
 46
                       Male                                 Female
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 52% of the respondents are male
and 48% of the respondents are female.
Majority of the respondents found in the survey are male.
   20
   10
     0
                       Married                              Unmarried
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 26% of the respondents are
married and the remaining 74% of the respondents are unmarried.
Its interprets that Majority of the respondents found in the survey are unmarried.
Table No: 4.3: Classification of the Respondent’s on the Basis Age Group
         Age group               No of Respondents                     Percentage
         Below 25                         35                               70
    Between 26-35                         12                               24
         Above 36                         3                                 6
           Total                          50                               100
Source: Primary Data
                                     Graph 4. 3
   80
                     70
   70
   60
   50
   40
   30                                      24
   20
   10                                                              6
     0
                   Below 25          Between 26-35              Above 36
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 70% of the respondents age group
is below 25 years, 24% of the respondents age group is between 26-35 years and the
remaining 6% of the respondents age group is above 36 years.
Majority of the respondents found in the survey are below 25 years of age group.
60
50
40
30
       20
                                 8                             10
       10         4                                                      4
        0
                 SSLC       PUC/Diploma      Graduate   Post Graduate   Other
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 4% of the respondents educational
qualification is SSLC, 8% of the respondents educational qualification is
PUC/Diploma, 74% of the respondents educational qualification is graduation, 10%
of the respondents educational qualification is post graduation and 4% of the
respondents educational qualification is others.
Majority of the respondents found in the survey are graduates.
Interpretation
The above graph analysis represents that 10% of the respondents are Professionals,
34% of the respondents are Businessmen, 12% of the respondents are Govt.
Employees, 40% of the Respondents are Students and 4% of the respondents are
belongs to others.
Its interprets that majority of the respondents are participated in the survey are
students..
25 24
                                                      20
         20
15
         10
                                                                     6
          5
          0
               Less than 10000   10000 -15000     15000 -20000   Above 20000
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents 30% of the respondents monthly
income is less than 10000, 24% of the respondents monthly income is between 10000
to 15000, 20% of the respondents monthly income is between 15000 to 20000 and 6%
of the respondents monthly income is above 20000.
Majority of the respondents found in the survey belongs to monthly income less than
10000.
Table No: 4. 7 Table shows on the Basis Respondent’s order food online
          Particular             No of Respondents               Percentage
             Yes                          50                         100
             No                           0                            0
            Total                         50                         100
Source: Primary Data
                                    Graph: 4. 10
    120
                          100
    100
80
60
40
     20
                                                             0
      0
                          Yes                               No
Interpretation
The above table and graphs showing that, all the respondents are who are participated
in the survey are ordering food through online.
Table No: 4. 8 Table showing which Company comes first to mind while here the
word food ordering app
              Particular                      No of Respondents        Percentage
                 Swiggy                              5                        10
                 Zomato                              45                       90
                 Others                              0                        0
                 Total                               50                     100
Source: Primary Data
                                    Graph: 4. 8
 100
                                              90
  90
  80
  70
  60
  50
  40
  30
  20
                  10
  10
                                                                        0
   0
                 Swiggy                    Zomato                    Others
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 10% of the Respondents belongs to
Swiggy, and 90% of the respondents are opined that Zomato Company comes first to
mind while here the word food ordering app.
Its interprets that Majority of the Respondents are well known about Zomato
Company.
Table No: 4. 9 Table shows respondents Come to know about Order food line
                Particular                    No of Respondents                Percentage
              Advertisement                               12                      24
            Friends & Relatives                           30                      60
              Other sources                               8                       16
                  Total                                   50                      100
Source: Primary Data
                                    Graph: 4. 9
       70
                                            60
       60
50
40
       30
                      24
20 16
10
        0
                 Advertisement      Friends & Relatives        Other sources
Interpretation
The above table and graph analysis represents that 24% of the respondents opined
They come to know about Online Food Ordering apps through Advertisement, 60% of
the respondents opined They come to know about Online Food Ordering apps through
Friends and relatives and 16% of the respondents opined They come to know about
Online Food Ordering apps through other sources.
Its interprets that majority of the respondents opined They come to know about Online
Food Ordering apps through Friends and relatives.
Table No: 4. 10: Table shows How often do respondents order food in online
               Particular                     No of Respondents             Percentage
                  Daily                                   5                    10
                 Weekly                                   25                   50
                 Fortnight                                12                   24
                 Monthly                                  8                    16
                  Total                                   50                   100
Source: Primary Data
                                     Graph: 4. 10
       60
                                    50
       50
40
       30
                                                     24
       20                                                              16
                   10
       10
        0
                  Daily           Weekly          Fortnight         Monthly
Interpretation
The above graph analysis represents that 10% of the Respondents opined that they
daily order Food in Online, 50% of the Respondents opined that they weekly order
Food in Online, 24% of the Respondents opined that they fortnightly order Food in
Online and 16% of the Respondents opined that they monthly order Food in Online
Its interprets that majority of the respondents order food in online weekly.
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 96% of the respondents are opined that they
order food in online through over the mobile app, and 4% of the respondents are
opined that they order food online through Over the web browser.
Its interprets that majority of the respondents opined that they order food in online
through over the mobile apps
Table No: 4.12: Table shows Approximate money spend on ordering food per
time
                 Particular                No of Respondents            Percentage
                   <150                              40                    80
                   <250                                 7                  14
                   <500                                 3                      6
            More than 500                               0                      0
                   Total                             50                    100
Source: Primary Data
                                    Graph: 4. 12
    90
                  80
    80
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
    20                            14
    10                                              6
                                                                    0
       0
                 <150             <250             <500        More than 500
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 80% of the respondents opined that they
spend < 150 Rupees spend on ordering food per time, 14% of the respondents opined
that they spend < 250 Rupees spend on ordering food per time, 6% of the respondents
opined that they spend more than 500 Rupees spend on ordering food per time.
Its interprets that majority of the respondents opined that they spend < 150 Rupees
spend on ordering food per time
Table No: 4. 13: Table shows respondents that food ordering App will prefer for
online food order
              Particular                    No of Respondents           Percentage
                  Swiggy                             5                         10
                  Zomato                            43                         86
              Food Panda                             2                         4
         Others please specify                       0                         0
                      Total                         50                       100
Source: Primary Data
                                   Graph: 4. 13
 100
  90                               86
  80
  70
  60
  50
  40
  30
  20             10
  10                                                     4
                                                                           0
   0
             Swiggy              Zomato           Food Panda      Others please specify
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 10% of the respondents opined that they
prefer Swiggy App for ordering food through online, 86% of the respondents opined
that they prefer Zomato App for ordering food through online & 4% of the
respondents opined that they prefer Food Panda App for ordering food through online.
Its interprets that majority the respondents opined that they prefer Zomato App for
ordering food through online
Table No: 4. 14: Table shows which advertising influences to buy / suggest any
product
                 Particular                               No of Respondents        Percentage
                 Magazines                                          3                        6
          Friends and Relatives                                     26                      52
            TV Commercial                                           12                      24
         Online advertisements                                      4                        8
  Social Media- Blogs, forums, social
                                                                    5                       10
           networking sites
                 Total                                              50                      100
Source: Primary Data
                                            Graph: 4. 14
TV Commercial 24
Magazines 6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Interpretation
The above table and graph shows that 6% of the respondents are opined that
Magazine Advertisementinfluences to buy / suggest any product, 52% of the
respondents are opined that Friends and relativesinfluences to buy / suggest any
product through online, 24% of the respondents are opined that TV Commercial
Advertisementinfluences to buy / suggest any product, 8% of the respondents belongs
to Online Advertisement and 10% of the respondents are opined that Advertisement
by Social Media- Blogs, forums, social networking sites influences to buy / suggest
any product through online.
Table No: 4. 15: Table shows respondents Typically order meal food online
             Particular                      No of Respondents        Percentage
              Break fast                               5                     10
                 Lunch                                31                     62
                 Snacks                                4                     8
                 Dinner                               10                     20
                 Total                                50                   100
Source: Primary Data
                                      Graph: 4. 15
  70
                                 62
  60
50
40
  30
                                                                      20
  20
              10                                       8
  10
   0
           Break fast          Lunch                 Snacks         Dinner
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 10% of the respondents opined that they
order breakfast through online, 62% of the respondents opined that they order Lunch
through online, 8% of the respondents opined that they order Snacks through online
and 20% of the respondents opined that they order Dinner food through online
Table No: 4. 16: Table shows How did respondents Come to Know about Zomato
             Particular                           No of Respondents            Percentage
                 Friends                                 31                          62
   T.V., news paper and magazines                        13                          26
           Advertisements                                 5                          10
         I haven't heard of it                            1                           1
                 Total                                   50                         100
                                 Source: Primary Data
                                      Graph: 4. 16
   70            62
   60
   50
   40
   30                              26
   20
                                                         10
   10
                                                                               1
    0
             Friends       T.V., news paper and     Advertisements    I haven't heard of it
                                 magazines
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 62% of the respondents come to know about
Zomato through Friends, 26% of the respondents come to know about Zomato
through TV, Newspaper & Magazines, 10% of the respondents come to know about
Zomato through Advertisement and 1% of the respondents haven’t heard of it.
Table No: 4. 17: Table shows respondents experience on other apps as compared
to Zomato
              Particular                 No of Respondents         Percentage
                 Better                          34                      68
                  Equal                          12                      24
                     Poor                         2                      4
            Not applicable                        2                      4
                  Total                          50                     100
Source: Primary Data
                                  Graph: 4. 17
   80
                 68
   70
   60
   50
   40
   30                           24
   20
   10                                             4                 4
    0
              Better           Equal             Poor         Not applicable
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 68% of the respondents opined that when
they compared to other apps Zamato apps give better experience to him, 12% of the
respondents opined that when they compared to other apps Zamato apps give equal
experience to him, 4% of the respondents opined that when they compared to other
apps Zamato apps give Poor experience to him & 4% of the respondents are belongs
to not applicable.
Table No: 4. 18: Table shows respondents often the product review influence
decision
             Particular                  No of Respondents         Percentage
                 Always                               34                     68
            Occasionally                              12                     24
                 Rarely                                2                      4
                 Never                                 2                      4
                  Total                               50                     100
Source: Primary Data
                                      Graph: 4. 18
   80
                 68
   70
   60
   50
   40
   30                            24
   20
   10                                                  4               4
    0
             Always          Occasionally            Rarely          Never
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that, 68% of the respondents opined that they
always review the products influence the decision, 24% of the respondents opined
that they occasionally review the products influence the decision, 4% of the
respondents belongs to rarely and 4% of the respondents belong to never.
Table No: 4. 19: Zomato promotional scheme on app to visit their app
                 Particular                    No of Respondents     Percentage
                    Always                            17                   34
               Occasionally                           21                   42
                    Rarely                            12                   24
                    Never                              0                     0
                    Total                             50                   100
Source: Primary Data
                                      Graph: 4. 18
 50
                                     42
 40            34
 30                                                   24
 20
 10
                                                                       0
  0
             Always             Occasionally         Rarely          Never
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 34% of the respondents opined that Zomato
promotional scheme on app always influence to visit their app, 42% of the
respondents opined that Zomato promotional scheme on app occasionally influence to
visit their app, 24% of the respondents opined that Zomato promotional scheme on
app rarely influence to visit their app.
Table No: 4.20: table showing will respondents do market research or compare
different companies or products before doing online food order
              Particular                     No of Respondents          Percentage
              Yes ,always                              20                  40
            Yes, sometimes                             25                  50
                  No                                   5                   10
                 Total                                 50                  100
Source: Primary Data
                                   Graph: 4. 14
 60
                                           50
 50
                 40
 40
30
 20
                                                                   10
 10
  0
             Yes ,always              Yes, sometimes               No
Interpretation
The above table and graphs shows that 40% of the Respondents opined that they
always do market research or compare different companies or products before doing
online food order, 50% of the Respondents opined that they sometimes do market
research or compare different companies or products before doing online food order
and 10 % of the Respondents opined that they don’t do market research or compare
different companies or products before doing online food order
Interpretation
The above table and graphs represents that 78% of the respondents opined that they
pay attention to advertisements or consider them while doing online and 22% of the
respondents opined that they don’t pay attention to advertisements or consider them
while doing online
40
30
20
10 6
   0
                  Yes               Yes, but it is not the primary   No, I don't consider it
                                                 factor
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that , 50% of the respondents opined that yes,
reliability of online food ordering apps important for them, 44% of the Respondents
belongs to Yes, But it is not the primary factor, and 6% of the respondents belongs to
No, I don’t consider it.
Table No: 4. 23: Table shows respondents rate the food packing style by Zomato
                 Particular                 No of Respondents      Percentage
                 Excellent                          37                 74
                     Good                           12                 24
                  Neutral                           0                   0
                  Average                           1                   0
                     Bad                            0                   0
                     Total                          50                 100
Source: Primary Data
                                     Graph: 4. 23
 80         74
 70
60
50
40
 30                            24
 20
 10
                                            0              0           0
  0
         Excellent            Good        Neutral        Average      Bad
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that, 74% of the respondents rate the Food
Packaging Style by Zomato as Excellent, 24% of the respondents rate the Food
Packaging Style by Zomato as Good
Table No: 4. 24: Table shows respondents like to rate quality service offered by
Zomato
                 Particular                     No of Respondents    Percentage
                 Excellent                             31                 62
                     Good                              12                 24
                  Average                              5                  10
                     Bad                               1                     1
                  Terrible                             1                     1
                     Total                             50                100
                                    Source: Primary Data
                                        Graph: 4. 24
 70
            62
 60
50
40
 30
                               24
 20
                                               10
 10
                                                             1           1
  0
         Excellent            Good           Average        Bad       Terrible
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 62% of the respondents opined that Quality
service offered by Zomato is Excellent, 24% of the respondents opined that Quality
service offered by Zomato is Good and 10% of the respondents opined that Quality
service offered by Zomato is Average.
Table No: 4. 25: Table shows respondents to say about the pricing of Zomato
services
                 Particular                 No of Respondents          Percentage
              Fairly priced                              27                  54
           Over priced products                          17                  34
              Under priced                               6                   12
                   Total                                 50                  100
Source: Primary Data
                                  Graph: 4. 25
 60
                   54
50
 40
                                          34
30
 20
                                                                  12
 10
  0
              Fairly priced       Over priced products        Under priced
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 54% of the respondents opined that pricing
of Zomato services is Fairly priced, 34% of the respondents opined that pricing of
Zomato services is over priced and 12% of the respondents opined that pricing of
Zomato services is under priced
Table No: 4. 26: Table shows respondents give ratings towards satisfaction level
with Zomato services
                 Particular                       No of Respondents            Percentage
              Outstanding                                  35                        70
           Very satisfactory                                8                        16
              Satisfactory                                  6                        12
         Somewhat satisfactory                              1                         1
                   Total                                   50                        100
Source: Primary Data
                                       Graph: 4. 26
    80
                  70
    70
    60
    50
    40
    30
    20                               16
                                                         12
    10                                                                     1
     0
           Outstanding        Very satisfactory      Satisfactory     Somewhat
                                                                      satisfactory
Interpretation
The above table and graph showing that 70% of the respondents opined that
satisfaction level with Zomato services is outstanding, 16% of the respondents are
very satisfied with service offered by Zomato, 12% of the respondents are satisfied
with zomato service and 1% of the respondents belong to somewhat satisfied with
Zomato service.
                           Chapter – 5
         Findings, Suggestions and Conclusion
                        5.1 Findings
                        5.2 Suggestions
                        5.3 Conclusion
     68% of the respondents opined that they always review the products influence
      the decision
     42% of the respondents opined that Zomato promotional scheme on app
      occasionally influence to visit their app,
     50% of the Respondents opined that they sometimes do market research or
      compare different companies or products before doing online food order
     78% of the respondents opined that they pay attention to advertisements or
      consider them while doing online
     50% of the respondents opined that yes, reliability of online food ordering
      apps important for them
     74% of the respondents rate the Food Packaging Style by Zomato as Excellent
     62% of the respondents opined that Quality service offered by Zomato is
      Excellent,
     54% of the respondents opined that pricing of Zomato services is Fairly
      priced,
     70% of the respondents opined that satisfaction level with Zomato services is
      outstanding
5.2 Suggestions
   Most of the respondents felt the prices of delivery charges are high. The high
      price is one of the reasons for consumer to ordering food through online. So
      food apps can consider this and reduce their delivery charges.
   The online food ordering apps have to improve their restaurants sites and
      menus to satisfy the consumer in a better way.
     Advertising plays a very important role in the purchase of a online ordering
      foods as most Customers are like to purchase because of advertisements.
     As most customers were between the age group of 20- 30 years so the
      company strategies should focus on that age group 20- 30 years.
     The company should focus on giving better quality product as most customers
      were very brand loyal and were generally satisfied with the product.
5.3 Conclusion
Online food ordering apps nowadays become fast moving in India, people do not find
adequate time to go for ordering food, because of fast pace of life. The internet has
become a major source in the digital era where online food ordering has gained
significance not only by the entrepreneurs but also among the consumer. Online food
ordering is in the fingertip of the consumer. It gives a different experience and
consumer can make the food ordering more fashionable over the internet as they
getting used it and becomes more enjoyable and easier.
The customers comfort is simply the primary facet good thing about such, whereas on
the second facet these system also are helpful for the expansion of eating place and
food provide trade, as by the utilization of digital food ordering system a eating place
owner are ready to attract the users attention by permitting them see the whole food
menu in conjunction with dish name, image, specialty, and price. Integration a web
food ordering system isn't any doubt are the simplest, cheap and helpful call for a
eating place business owner. With constant deluge of experts in urban areas and fast
urbanization of Indian scene, the food delivery and eatery portion is currently
flourishing at a rankling pace. Adding to this situation is an expanding number of cell
phones and food delivery applications. Food delivery applications have now turned
into a major hit with well-informed people crosswise over India. There are a few food
delivery applications in India that one can download on advanced cells to arrange
food in a hurry and from the solace of homes. The changing urban way of life of the
normal Indian is sufficiently emotional to be ideal for the food-on-the– go and fast
home delivery models to develop at higher rates. The regularly expanding populace
swarmed metro urban communities and longer travel times are drivers for the helpful,
prepared to eat and less expensive alternatives of having food and foodstuffs
conveyed at your doorstep. Organizations that know about the colossal potential for
development may wander straight in, yet just the fittest will endure. Organizations
who keep their offer and their image dynamic in purchaser's brains, will take the
greatest offer of the Indian online food benefit pie.
                                Questionnaire
I am Chandana J.S studying final year BBA in PESIAMS Shivamogga. I have
undergone a project report on the topic“A Study on Customer perception towards
online food ordering apps with special reference to Zomato in Shivamogga . I
would like to request you to fill the questionnaires
Thanking you
                                                                Yours faithfully,
                                                               (Chandana J.S)
Name           :       __________________________________
Address        :       __________________________________
                       __________________________________
1. Gender
   i) Male                  [      ]
   ii) Female               [      ]
2. Marital status:
   i) Married               [      ]
   ii) Unmarried            [      ]
3. Age:
   i) Below 30              [      ]
   ii) Between 30-40        [      ]
   iii) Above 40            [      ]
4. Educational qualification
   i) SSLC                  [      ]
   ii) PUC                  [      ]
   iii) Graduate            [      ]
   iv) Post Graduate        [      ]
   v) Others                [      ]
5. Occupation
   i) Professional          [      ]
   ii) Businessmen          [      ]
   iii) Govt Employees      [      ]
   iv) Student                [    ]
   v) Others                  [    ]
6. Monthly income
   i) Less than 10000         [    ]
   ii) 10000-15000            [    ]
   iii) 15000-20000           [    ]
   iv) Above 20000            [    ]
7. Do you order food online?
   i) Yes                     [    ]
   ii) No                     [    ]
8. If yes, which company comes first to your mind when you hear the word food
   ordering app?
   i) Swiggy                  [    ]
   ii) Zomato                 [    ]
   iii) Others                [    ]
9. How you come to know about Ordering food online?
   i) Advertisement           [    ]
   ii) Friends & Relatives    [    ]
   iii) Other Sources         [    ]
10. How often do you order food in Online?
   i) Daily             [     ]
   ii) Weekly           [     ]
   iii) Fortnight       [     ]
   iv) Monthly          [     ]
11. In general, how do you prefer to order food?
   i) over the mobile app          [      ]
   ii) over the web browser        [      ]
   iii) others                     [      ]
12. What is the approximate money you spend on ordering food per time?
   i) <150                         [      ]
   ii) <250                         [     ]
   iii) <500                        [     ]
   iv) More than 500                [     ]
13. Which Food ordering App will you prefer for online food order?
       i) Swiggy                    [     ]
       ii) Zomato                   [     ]
       iii) Food Panda              [     ]
       iv) Others, please specify   _________________
14. What mode of advertising influences you to buy/suggest any product?
   i) Magazines and newspaper                                        [       ]
   ii) Friends and relatives                                         [       ]
   iii) TV Commercial                                                [       ]
   iv) Online advertisements                                         [       ]
   v) Social Media – Blogs, forums, Social Networking sites          [       ]
18. How often does the product review influence your decision?
  i)    Always                    [   ]
  ii)   Occasionally              [   ]
  iii) Rarely                     [   ]
  iv) Never                       [   ]
19. How often does the Zomato promotional scheme on app influence you to visit
   their app?
  i)    Always                    [   ]
  ii)   Occasionally              [   ]
  iii) Rarely                     [   ]
  iv) Never                       [   ]
20. Do you conduct market research or compare different companies or products
   before doing online food order?
   i) Yes, always                 [   ]
   ii) Yes, sometimes             [   ]
   iii) No                        [   ]
21. Do you pay attention to advertisements or consider them while doing online
   food order?
   i) Yes                         [   ]
   ii) No                         [   ]
22. Is the reliability of online food ordering apps important for you?
   i) Yes,                                   [    ]
   ii) Yes, but it is not the primary factor [    ]
   iii) No, I don’t consider it              [    ]
   v) Bad                     [   ]
24. How would you like to rate Quality Service offered by Zomato?
   i) Excellent               [   ]
   ii) Good                   [   ]
   iii) Average               [   ]
   iv) Bad                    [   ]
   v) Terrible                [   ]
25. What do you have to say about the pricing of Zomato Service?
   i) Fairly priced               [      ]
   ii) Over priced products       [      ]
   iii) Under priced              [      ]
26. How do you rate your satisfaction level with Zomato Service?
   i) Outstanding                 [      ]
   ii) Very satisfactory          [      ]
   iii) Satisfactory              [      ]
   iv) Somewhat satisfactory      [      ]
27. Any suggestion to Company for providing better service to customers
   ………………………………………………………………………………………
   ………………………………………………………………………………………
Date : ……………
Place: ……………
(Signature)
                                   Bibliography
Articles and Journals