[go: up one dir, main page]

Writ of Kalikasan: HR Law Summer Class

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Writ Of Kalikasan

HR Law Summer Class

Atty. Irene Valones

Bulaon, Alexandria C.
Definition

A Writ Of Kalikasan is a legal remedy under Philippine


law that provides protection of one's Constitutional
right to a healthy environment.

The bases for issuing Writ Of Kalikasan?

1987 Constitution
o Article 2 Sec. 16
o Article 2 Sec. 15
Environmental Justice
Inter-generational Responsibility (Oposa v. Factoran)
- What are the main issues considered by the
Supreme Court Committee which affects the
prosecution of environmental cases?

Objectives of Writ of Kalikasan?

For protection and promotion of constitutional


right;
For simplified, speedy and inexpensive procedure;
To introduce and adopt innovations; and
To enable the courts to monitor and exact
compliance.
Some features of the Writ of Kalikasan?

First of its kind in the WORLD.


Special Civil Action
Rule 7 of A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC: Rules of Procedure
for Environmental Cases (Effective April 29, 2010)
A remedial measure that may be granted by the
courts upon the request of a person or a group whose
constitutional right to a healthy environment is violated.
What is the nature of a writ of kalikasan?

It is an extraordinary remedy

Instances wherein the SC issued Writ of Kalikasan.

Taal Lake
Zamboanga Peninsula
Boac River in Marinduque
Baguio City
Manila Bay
Batangas-to-Manila

Who can file a petition for Writ of Kalikasan?

Natural or juridical person;


Those who are violated, or threatened with
violation;
By an unlawful act or omission;
Involving environmental damage.

- Why is there a need for accreditation of a group or


organization?
What are the contents of a petition for Writ of
Kalikasan?

Personal circumstances of the petitioner;


Name and personal circumstances of the
respondent, or if name is unknown or uncertain, an
appellation for him;
The environmental law violated;
The act or omission complained of;
The environmental damage of such magnitude as
to prejudice the health, life or property of inhabitants
in two or more cities or provinces;
All relevant or material evidence;
Certification of petitioner under oath that:
He has not commenced any action involving the
same issue;
If there is a pending action, the present status
thereof;
If he should learn that the same claim has been
filed or is pending, he should report such fact within
5 days from knowledge thereof to the court;
The reliefs prayed for.
- Where is it filed?
- Docket fee
- How is the writ issued and served
- What if the court officers refuse to issue or serve the
writ?
- When should the respondent file a verified return?

What are the contents of the return?

All defenses
Affidavits of witnesses
Documentary evidence
Scientific or other expert studies
Object evidence, if possible

- What is the effect if respondent will not raise all his


defenses in the return?
- What is the effect of a general denial?

What are the prohibited pleadings and motions?

Motion to dismiss;
Motion for extension of time to file return;
Motion for postponement;
Motion for a bill of particulars;
Counterclaim or cross-claim;
Third-party complaint;
Reply; and
Motion to declare respondent in defaul
- What is the purpose of providing for prohibited pleadings
and motions?
- Is a motion for intervention prohibited?
- What is the effect for failure to file a return?
- What are the matters taken up in a preliminary
conference?
- What is the duration of the preliminary conference and
hearing?
- What is the nature of the hearing?

What are the discovery measures available?


“ocular inspection” and “production or inspection of
documents or things.”

- How can the discovery measures be availed of?


- Who can avail of the discovery measures?

What should be alleged in the motion for an “ocular


inspection?”

The motion must show that an ocular inspection order is


necessary to establish the magnitude of the violation or the
threat as to prejudice the life, health or property of
inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces.
It shall state in detail the place or places to be
inspected.
It shall be supported by affidavits of witnesses having
personal knowledge of the violation or threatened violation
of environmental law.
- What are the contents of the “ocular inspection order?”
- What should be alleged in the motion for “production or
inspection of documents or things?”
- What are the contents of the “production or inspection order of
documents or things?”
- What are the limits on the issuance of the discovery measures?
- Who may be punished for indirect contempt?
- What are the contents of the order of the court submitting the
case for decision?
- What is the purpose of requiring the filing of memoranda in
electronic form?
- What is the procedure in rendering judgment?
What are the reliefs that may be granted under the writ of
kalikasan?

to permanently cease and desist from committing acts


or neglecting the performance of a duty in violation of
environmental laws resulting in environmental destruction
or damage;
Directing the respondent to protect, preserve,
rehabilitate or restore the environment;
Directing the respondent to monitor strict compliance
with the decision and orders of the court;
Directing the respondent to make periodic reports on
the execution of the final judgment; and
Such other reliefs.

- Are the reliefs available exclusive?


- What is the remedy in case an adverse judgment was
rendered?
- Can a question of fact be raised on appeal?

May a party institute separate actions?

After hearing, Yes.


CASE IN RELATION TO THE APPLICATION OF WRIT OF KALIKASAN

Paje VS Casiño

Facts:

- SBMA
- TCC expressed their intention to build a power plant in
Subic Bay
- SBMA Ecology Center issued SBFZ Environmental
Compliance Certificate (ECC).
- Sangguniang Panglalawigan of Zambales opposed the
establishment of a power plant.
- They filed a Petition for Writ of kalikasan against RP
Energy.
ARIGO vs. SWIFT

FACTS:

- The USS Guardian, the United States avenger class mine


counter-measures ship, from its routine ship replenishment,
maintenance, and crew liberty in Subic Bay damaged the
Tubbataha reef on its way to Sulu Sea.
- Petitioners Arigo et. al. filed a petition for issuance of Writ
of Kalikasan claiming that the grounding, salvaging and
post-salvaging operations of the USS Guardian caused and
continue to cause environmental damage that affected
several provinces, which violate their constitutional rights to
a balanced and healthful ecology.
- Petitioners argue that there is a waiver of immunity from
suit found in the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA). 
WEST TOWER CONDOMINIUM CORP. vs. FIRST
PHILIPPINE INDUSTRIAL CORP.

Facts:

- A petition for issuance of writ of kalikasan was filed


by West Tower Condominium after First Philippine
Industrial Corporation’s (FPIC) pipeline used to
transport diesel, gasoline, jet fuel and kerosene, burst
and seeped into the condominium’s basement.
- West Tower Condominium argued that FPIC’s
omission or failure to timely replace its pipelines and to
observe extraordinary diligence caused the petroleum
spill in the City of Makati; and the continued use of the
now 4 to 7-year old pipeline would not only be a
hazard or a threat to the lives, health, and property of
those who live or sojourn in all the municipalities in
which the pipeline is laid, but would also affect the
rights of the generations yet unborn to live in a
balanced and healthful ecology.
- The Court's issued Writ of Kalikasan, accompanied
by TEPO, for FPIC to cease operations on both (a) the
White Oil Pipeline System (WOPL System), (b) the
Black Oil Pipeline System (BOPL System)
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL CASES
A.M. NO. 09-6-8-SC: APRIL 13, 2010

https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2015/feb2015/
gr_207257_2015.html

https://www.scribd.com/book/336511746

You might also like