100% (2) 100% found this document useful (2 votes) 2K views 13 pages Dr. Ciaran McNamee's Amended Statement of Claim.
NOTE: None of the allegations in this lawsuit have been proven in court.
Dr. Ciaran McNamee's amended statement of claim filed against the University of Alberta Hospital, the Capital Health Authority, Dr. Robert Bear and Dr. Tim Winton
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Dr. Ciaran McNamee's amended statement of claim. For Later oo ‘Amended this day of , 2004 by
consent dated this 23 day of_Qusy , 2004
‘Action No: 0201-14409
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY
BETWEEN:
DR. CIARAN J. MCNAMEE and
QARAN J. MCNAMEE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Plaintiffs
=and=
\LBERTA HOSPITAL, CAPITAL HEALTH AUTHORITY,
. ROBERT BEAR and DR. TIM WINTON
Defendants
os
AMENDED STATE! OF CLAIM
Ae The Plaintiff Dr. Ciaran J. McNamee (“Dr. McNamee”) is an individual who
at all material times hereto resided in Edmonton, Alberta.
2. The Plaintiff Ciaran J. McNamee Professional Corporation (the “Professional
Corporation”) is a professional corporation duly incorporated pursuant to the Business
Corporations Act of Alberta.
3. The Defendant University of Alberta Hospital (the “Hospital”) is a large, urban,
tertiary care hospital located in Edmonton, Alberta. The Hospital is the teaching hospital
associated with the faculty of medicine at the University of Alberta.
EKerriMeNamee Pleadings mended Statement of4 The Defendant, Capital Health Authority was at all material times @
responsible for the operation of the Hospital, or alternatively, became responsible for the
liabilities and obligations of the Hospital and the physicians with hospital admitting
privileges pursuant to the Regional Health Authorities Act and the bylaws and regulations
thereunder.
5. The Defendant Dr. Robert Bear (“Dr. Bear”) is an individual resident in
Edmonton, Alberta. At all material times Dr. Bear was the Executive Vice-President, Chief
Clinical Officer of the Capital Health Authority and was the Associate Dean, Clinical Affairs
for the Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry at the University of Alberta.
6. The Defendant Dr. Tim Winton ("Dr. Winton’) is an individual resident in
Edmonton, Alberta. At all material times Dr. Winton was a thoracic surgeon at the
Hospital
a In May 1994 Dr. McNamee was offered a position as Assistant Clinical
Professor, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, at the Hospital. Dr.
McNamee accepted the appointment which was effective June 25, 1994.
8. Dr. McNamee moved from Sudbury, Ontario to take the position of Assistant
Clinical Professor at the Hospital
9 The position of Assistant Clinical Professor was a full time staff position at
the Hospital. Pursuant o the terms of his engagement at the Hospital, Dr. McNamee was
to devote 80% of his time to clinical practice, 10% of his time to research and 10% of his
time to teaching,
10. Dr. MeNamee's offer of employment provided for a guaranteed gross income
of $150,000 per year for the first two years of the appointment.
" Dr. McNamee commenced employment with the Hospital on June 25, 1994
ENaresiMeNameePleadings\Amended Statement of lain 212. In February, 1996, Dr. McNamee was appointed Section Leader for the
Thoracic Surgery Division. As Section Leader Dr. McNamee was to provide regional
leadership in thoracic surgery.
13. The Capital Health Authority paid Dr. McNamee a stipend of $8,000 per year
to compensate him in his role as Section Leader of Thoracic Surgery.
14, Dr. McNamee generated the bulk of his income through billings to Alberta
Health Care. His staff appointment at the Hospital enabled Dr. McNamee to see patients,
perform surgery and generally engage in the practice of medicine which resulted in billings
to Alberta Health Care. All billings to Alberta Health Care were done through the
Professional Corporation,
15. The Professional Corporation billed the following amounts to Alberta Health
Care between 1997 and 2000:
1997: $445,015.00
1998: $440,245.00
1999: $452,846.00
2000: $627,440.00
2001: $193,428.00
16. On September 11, 1998 Dr. McNamee received a letter of commendation
from Dr. Stewart Hamilton, Chief of Surgery at the Hospital, expressing his gratitude for Dr.
McNamee’s commitment to a heavy clinical load while balancing a major commitment to
the Royal College and other surgical societies and still finding time to publish.
17. Through late 1998 and early 1999 Dr. McNamee began having concerns over
wait times for thoracic surgery at Edmonton Hospitals.
18. In January 1999, Dr. Bear sent a fetter to Dr. McNamee complimenting Dr.
McNamee on his leadership in the thoracic surgery department.
-EAKaren\McNamee\Pleadings\Amended Statement of Clan 319, On February 11, 1999 Dr. McNamee made a presentation to the Provincial
Government Caucus, including Minister Iris Evans, regarding his concem over inadequate
resources being allocated to thoracic surgery patients in Alberta. Following the meeting
Iris Evans followed up in a discussion with Dr. McNamee in relation to the concems he
expressed.
20, On May 7, 1999 Dr. McNamee met with Mr. Ford, the Deputy Health Minister,
to discuss problems in the Capital Health Region including allocation of resources. During
the meeting Dr. McNamee made recommendations to Mr. Ford for the improvement of
thoracic surgery service delivery in the Capital Health Region.
2 On May 9, 1999 Dr. McNamee received a letter from Dr. Bear expressing
concern about his meetings with government officials or other officials regarding
advocating for thoracic surgery resources. Dr. Bear stated in his letter to Dr. McNamee
that Dr. McNamee's advocacy would no longer be tolerated and that the Capital Health
Authority was dealing with the issues on its own time line.
22. In his letter of May 9, 1999, Dr. Bear confirmed that Dr. McNamee, in his
medical leadership role, was an employee of the Capital Health Region.
23. On the same day he received Dr. Bear's letter of May 9, 1999, Dr. McNamee
wrote a letter to Dr. Bear explaining how he was advocating for additional resources to help
patients with thoracic oncology problems and how he did not intend to cause any
inconvenience through his actions.
24. In the Spring of 2000 Dr. McNamee received a letter of commendation from
Dr. Nadia Mikhael for his services as a member of the Examination Board in Thoracic
Surgery.
25. On July 27, 2000 it was announced that Dr. Tim Winton was appointed as
the Capital Health Region's new Section Head for Thoracic Surgery, a post which had
_BKarerietamoe\pleadings\Amensed Statement of Claim 4previously been held by Dr. McNamee. No reason was provided for the removal of Dr.
McNamee as Section Head of Thoracic Surgery.
26. In August 2000 Dr. McNamee was appointed medical staff of the Caritas
Health Group, giving him privileges at the Grey Nuns Community Hospital and Health
Centre. Atapproximately the same time, Dr. McNamee's privileges with the Capital Health
Region were renewed.
27. Early in September of 2000 Dr. Bear and Dr. Winton, or either of them, falsely
and maliciously represented to Dr. McNamee's colleagueg at the Hospital and to members
of the Capital Health Authority and Hospital administration that Dr. McNamee was unfit to
practice as a thoracic surgeon and that he should be suspended from practice. The
particulars of the false and malicious statements include:
(a) __ statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee did not have the mental
or emotional capacity to practice medicine;
(b) statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee’s clinical skills were
deficient;
(©) _ statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee performed inadequate
or incomplete pre-operative staging investigations;
(4) _ statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee pursued an overly
aggressive approach to surgery in that he performed surgery on a high
number of stage 3 and stage 4 lung cancer patients; he had a high incidence
of unplanned pneumonectomies; and he had a high incidence of ‘open and
close" thoracotomies4_
(e) statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee had questionable clinical
skill and judgment resulting in overly long operating times;
EnKareniMeNameeteadings Amensed Statement of Claim 5() statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee had questionable clinical
skills and judgment resulting in excessive peri-operative morbidity and
mortality;
(g)__ statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee had questionable clinical
skills and judgment resulting in poor yield from mediastincoscopies;
(h) allegations made to Dr. McNamee’s wife and former secretary that Dr.
McNamee was in need of emergency psychiatric care;
(i) statements or words to the effect that Dr. McNamee poorly managed his
waiting list by failing to prioritize patients on the waiting list and including
patients on the waiting list who were not surgical candidates or could have
been treated non-surgically; and
@ such further and other false and malicious statements as will be proved at
the Trial of the Action.
28 On or about September 24, 2000, the Capital Health Authority and the
Hospital forced Dr. McNamee to withdraw from his clinical practice at the Hospital and to
withdraw from his teaching and administrative duties in the Captial Health Region until
such time as the Capital Health Authority was satisfied that Dr. McNamee was able to
retum to practice. By forcing Dr. McNamee to withdraw from his practice and his duties,
the Capital Health Authority and the Hospital were in breach of their contract with Dr.
McNamee.
29. It was a term of Dr. McNamee’s employment contract, express or implied,
that Dr. McNamee would be permitted to practice as a thoracic surgeon at the Hospital so
long as he remained in good standing with the College of Physicians and Surgeons and
that he would not be prevented from practising as a physician and surgeon unless and until
proper practice review had taken place wherein the allegations against Dr. McNamee
were made known to him and he had an opportunity to respond to those allegations.
EKaren'MeNarnee\Pteadings\ Amended Statement of Claim 630. The Capital Health Authority and the Hospital forced Dr. McNamee to
withdraw from his practice, thereby preventing Dr. McNamee from practising medicine and
thereby breaching their contract with Dr. McNamee either in whole or in part as a result of
the false and malicious statements made by Dr. Bear and Dr. Winton, or either of them,
31. The false and malicious statements made_by Dr_Bear_and Dr Winton
concerning Dr. McNamee were calculated to adversely affect Dr. McNamee's ability to
practise medicine and to cause pecuniary damage to Dr. McNamee.
32. By reason of the false and malicious statements that were made about Dr.
McNamee, Dr. McNamee was unable to continue practising medicine and his Professional
Corporation was no longer able to bill Alberta Health Care, The Professional Corporation
and Dr. McNamee suffered @ financial losses as a direct result of the false and malicious
statements made by Dr. Bear and Dr. Winton, or either of them.
33. Atall material times the Hospital and the Capital Health Authority negligently
or intentionally refused to disclose to Dr. McNamee the nature of allegations against him
and they negligently or intentionally refused to permit Dr. McNamee to respond to the
allegations against him.
34. Itwas a term, express or implied, of Dr. McNamee’s contract of employment
with the Capital Health Authority and the Hospital that any practice reviews would be
conducted with the full participation of Dr. McNamee and that any assessments would be
based on a complete and comprehensive review of all relevant materials. The Hospital
and the Capital Health Authority breached the contract by conducting a haphazard and
incomplete review of the relevant materials leading them to make erroneous conclusions
regarding Dr. McNamee's practice.
35. ‘The Hospital and th ital Heal thority negligently or intentionalh
greated an intolerable working environment for Dr McNamee, and subsequently failed or
fefused to respond to his complaints regarding his intolerable working environment,
EAreriMfeNamesleaingsUAmenfed Statement of Chi 7Further, the Hospital and the Capital Health Authority negligently relied on accusations and
allegations made by Dr. Winton and Dr. Bear, or either of them, without investigating or
attempting to substantiate the allegations and accusations, The Hospital and the Capital
Health Authority were further negligent in failing to disclose the accusations and allegations
to Dr. McNamee to permit him to respond before he was forced to give up his clinical
practice. The Hospital and the Capital Health Authority were further negligent in failing to
recognize that Dr. Winton stood to gain financially from Dr. McNamee's removal and that
his allegations and accusations were therefore suspect. The Hospital and the Capital
Health Authority were further negligent in dismissing Dr. McNamee from his staff position
and refusing to permit Dr. McNamee to practice medicine at the Hospital based on
allegations and accusations from those who stood to benefit from Dr. McNamee’s removal.
36. Upon forcing Dr. McNamee to withdraw 4 from practising at the Hospital, in
in agreement dal tember 22, 2000 (‘the September Agreement’) the Capital Health
Authority promised, amongst other things, to pay Dr. McNamee for all professional fees lost
during the six month period following Dr. McNamee’s withdrawal from practice in an
amount equal to Dr. McNamee’s average monthly billings to Alberta Health and Wellness
over the twelve months ending July 31, 2000 less related expenses. Additionally, the
ital Health Auth romised, upon Dr McNamee meeting certain conditions, which
included attending atan assessment centre to have his ability to practice determined, that
itwould reintegrate Dr_McNamee into the Capital Health Authority thoracic surgery
program.
37. The Capital Health Authority has breached # the September Agreement 4 by
“ failing or # refusing to make such payments, and by refusimg to reintegrate Dr, McNamee
into the Capital Authority's thoracic surgery program.
38. In breaching its employment contract, the September Agreement and the
duty of care owed to Dr. McNamee, the Hospital and the Capital Health Authority acted in
a high handed, vexatious and oppressive manner.
EAKresitMeNamedieaings Amended Satement of Cin 839. in February of 2001, Dr. McNamee underwent an independent practice
review conducted by Dr. Ginsberg of the Toronto General Hospital. Dr. Ginsberg had the
following comments:
a. Dr. McNamee had virtually 100% compliance with respect to CT scans and
pulmonary function studies;
b. There was no evidence of gross malpractice or marked deviation from
accepted practice to account for the sudden dismissal from the medical staff
at the Hospital or to suggest that his practice conduct warranted loss of
licensure;
©. There was room for improvement in the area of sampling of lymph nods
within the mediastinum at mediastinoscopy and in reducing the operating
time to complete esophagectomies.
40. Dr. Ginsberg concluded his review by stating: “Other than the above
mentioned deviations from excellence, | found no real problem of serious import in
reviewing the binders submitted with regard to reasonable medical practice.”
a In addition to the practice review conducted by Dr. Ginsberg, Dr. McNamee
underwent an assessment at the Rush Behavioural Health Centre in Illinois in October of
2000. The opinion provided by the Rush Behavioural Health Centre states in part: “As a
result of completing our clinical evaluation, reviewing all available data, and conferring with
collateral sources, we are of the opinion, to a reasonable degree of medical and psychiatric
certainty, Dr. McNamee does not currently suffer from a major psychiatric illness. At the
present time, there is no evidence he suffers from a major disorder of mood, thought,
cognition, anxiety, impulse-control or substance abuse-dependence. Dr. McNameeis not
believed impaired, and at the present time, considered appropriate to practice medicine
with requisite competency, safety and skill” The Rush Behavioural Centre stated there
was no basis for the action the Hospital had taken
EkereshMeNametPeadngs Amended Statement of Claas 942. Dr. McNamee commenced employmentwith the Defendants on an indefinite
basis. An implied term of the employment contract was that he would not be dismissed
without cause, without being provided with reasonable notice or pay in lieu of such notice
The Capital Health Authority and the Hospital breached that implied term of the contract
by forbidding Dr. McNamee to practice medicine at the Hospital and in effect constructively
dismissing Dr. McNamee. from his position on staff at the Hospital without notice and
without cause.
43. Atall material times, Dr. McNamee carried out his duties as a physician and
surgeon at the Hospital faithfully and diligently and he routinely exceeded his job
sequirements,
44. As a result of the breaches of contract and negligent acts of the Hospital and
the Capital Health Authority, Dr. McNamee was not able to return to practice at the Hospital
and as a result he has suffered and continues to suffer a loss of income.
45. As a result of the false and malicious statements made by Dr. Bear and Dr.
Winton, or either of them, Dr. McNamee has suffered pecuniary losses as a result of being
dismissed from his practice at the Hospital.
46. Dr. McNamee has further suffered from emotional and psychological anguish
as a result of the false and malicious accusations and allegations made.
47. Dr. McNamee has further suffered from a loss of reputation as a result of the
false and malicious statements made by Dr. Bear and Dr. Winton, or either of them.
48. The Plaintiffs propose that the trial of this action take place at the Court
House in Calgary, Alberta and anticipate that the trial will take less than 25 days.
WHEREFORE THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS
CAPITAL HEALTH AUTHORITY AND UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA HOSPITAL, jointly and
severally, as follows:
.dtarentdeNameePleadingAmended Staten of Claim 10(a)
(©)
(d)
(e)
@
(9)
Pecuniary damages # in an amount representing past and future loss of
income in an amount to be quantified at trial:
Aggravated or punitive damages in the amount of $100,000.00 for the high
handed, malicious and oppressive conduct of the Defendants;
Special damages for the costs of finding alternate employment and the costs
of moving in an amount to be quantified at trial;
Damages for mental anguish and suffering in the amount of $50,000.00;
Interest on the above claimed awards pursuant to the Judgment Interest Act,
S.A. 1984, c. J-0.5, as amended;
Costs of this Action; and,
‘Such further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just and
appropriate having regard to all of the circumstances.
WHEREFORE THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIMAGAINST THE DEFENDANTS DR.
ROBERT BEAR and DR. TIM WINTON, jointly and severally, as follows:
(a)
(b)
(o)
(a)
Pecuniary damages for false and malicious statements in an amount
representing past and future loss of income resulting from the false and
malicious statements in an amount to be quantified at trial;
Damages for mental anguish and suffering in the amount of $50,000.00;
Damages for loss of reputation in the amount of $250,000.00;
Interest on the above claimed awards pursuant to the Judgment Interest Act,
S.A. 1984, c. J-0.5, as amended;
‘EAKareriMoNamestPlesdings\Amended Statement of Claim i(e) Costs of this Action; and,
() Such further and other relief as this Honourable Court may deem just and
appropriate having regard to all of the circumstances,
DATED at the City of Calgary, in the Province of Alberta, this 27" day of -
August, 2002, AND DELIVERED BY May Jensen Shawa Solomon LLP, Barristers,
Counsel for the Plaintiff herein whose address for service is in care of the said Barristers,
600, 606 - 4" Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 171
ISSUED out of the office of the Clerk of this Honourable Court this €7_day
of August, 2002. ae
JIM MoLAUGHLUIN Gr)
SEAL
Clerk of the Court
Amendment consented to pursuantto Rule
136 of the Alberta Rules of Court, this
L5"day of 2004
FIELD LLP
~~!
Per: ~—
y ie
Counsel for the Defendants
EcareteNamee Pleading Amended Statement of Cain 12NOTICE
TO University of Alberta Hospital
Capital Health Authority
Dr. Robert Bear
Dr. Tim Winton
You have been sued, You are the
Defendants. You have only 15 days to file
and serve a Statement of Defence or
Demand of Notice. You or your lawyer must
file your Statement of Defense or Demand of
Notice in the office of the Clerk of the Court of
Queen's Bench in Calgary, Alberta. You or
your lawyer must also leave a copy of your
Statement of Defence or Demand of Notice at
the address for service for the Plaintiff named
in this Statement of Claim.
WARNING: If you do not do both things
within 15 days, you may automatically lose
the lawsuit. The Plaintiff may get a Court
Judgment against you if you do net file, or do
not give a copy to the Plaintiff, or do either
thing late.
This Statement of Claim is issued by
MAY JENSEN SHAWA SOLOMON LLP
Sabri M. Shawa
Telephone No. 571-1520
Fax No. 571-1528
Solicitors for the Plaintiff whose address for
service is in care of the said solicitors.
The individual Defendants (so far as known to
the Plaintiff) reside in Edmonton, Alberta
EKaresiMeNamce Pleading Amended Sistoment of Claim
ACTION NO. 0201-14409
IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH
OF ALBERTA
JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF CALGARY
BETWEEN:
DR. CIARAN J. MCNAMEE and
CIARAN J. MCNAMEE PROFESSIONAL
CORPORATION
Plaintiffs:
-and-
UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA HOSPITAL,
CAPITAL HEALTH AUTHORITY,
DR. ROBERT BEAR and DR. TIM WINTON
Defendants
AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
MAY JENSEN SHAWA SOLOMON LLP
Barristers
600, 606 - 4" Street S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 171
Attention: Sabri M. Shawa
Phone: 71-1527
Fax: 571-1528
File No. 9501 001
You might also like Hayes, Et Al V University Health Shreveport, LLC DBA Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport, LLC Etc., 663-022, 1st JDC Caddo Parish, 10-5-2021 PDF
Hayes, Et Al V University Health Shreveport, LLC DBA Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport, LLC Etc., 663-022, 1st JDC Caddo Parish, 10-5-2021
22 pages