[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
166 views9 pages

Quo Warranto: A. Jurisdiction B. Nature and Definition - Compare With Mandamus C. Timeliness of Filing Petition

This document outlines and discusses various causes of action and legal procedures in Philippine law, including quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. For each topic, the document discusses jurisdiction, nature and definition, relevant stages and phases, parties that may be involved, and key Supreme Court cases that provide guidance. The document is intended as a guide for legal practitioners on the procedures and jurisprudence related to these important areas of Philippine law.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
166 views9 pages

Quo Warranto: A. Jurisdiction B. Nature and Definition - Compare With Mandamus C. Timeliness of Filing Petition

This document outlines and discusses various causes of action and legal procedures in Philippine law, including quo warranto, expropriation, foreclosure of real estate mortgages, and partition. For each topic, the document discusses jurisdiction, nature and definition, relevant stages and phases, parties that may be involved, and key Supreme Court cases that provide guidance. The document is intended as a guide for legal practitioners on the procedures and jurisprudence related to these important areas of Philippine law.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

7.

Quo Warranto
a. Jurisdiction
b. Nature and Definition
- Compare with Mandamus
c. Timeliness of filing Petition
 Torres v. Quintos, G.R. No. L-3304, 4

May 1951

 Republic v. Sereno, G.R. No. 237428, 11

May 2018

d. Quo Warranto Omnibus Election Code


vs. Rules of Court
- Omnibus Election Code, Sec. 253

- Comelec Rules of Procedure, Rule 21,

Sec. 1

- A.M. No. 10-4-1-SC – 2010 Rules of

Procedure for Municipal Election

Constests, Rule 2, Sec. 2

 Rivera v. COMELEC, G.R. Nos. 210273

& 213069, 19 April 2016

e. Parties, Legal Standing


 Republic v. Sereno, G.R. No. 237428, 11

May 2018

 Mendoza v. Allas, G.R. No. 131977, 4


February 1999

 PLDT v. NTC, G.R. No. 88404, 18

October 1990

 Divinagracia v. Consolidated

Broadcasting System, Inc., G.R. No.

162272, 7 April 2009

 Gonzalez v. Chavez, G.R. No. 97351, 4

February 1992

 General v. Urro, G.R. No. 191560, 29

March 2011

f. Venue

g. Damages

8. Expropriation
a. Jurisdiction
 Ruby Shelter Builders v. Formaran, G.R.

No. 175914, 10 February 2009

 BPI v. Hontanosas, G.R. No. 157163, 25

June 2014

 Barrido v. Nonato, G.R. No. 176492, 20


October 2014

 Bardillon v. Barangay Masili, G.R. No.

146886, 30 April 2003

 Barangay San Roque v. Heirs of Pastor,

G.R. No. 138896, 20 June 2000

 NTC v. Bermuda Development Corp,

G.R. No. 214782, 3 April 2019

b. Nature, Definition, Distinguished from


Eminent Domain

c. Stages/ Phases; Inverse Condemnation


 Republic v. Phil-Ville Development and

Housing Corporation, G.R. No. 172243, 26

June 2007

 Eusebio v. Luis, G.R. No. 162474, 13

October 2009

 De Ynchausti v. Manila Electric Railroad

& Light Co., 36 Phil. 908 (1917)

 National Power Corporation v. ManubayAgro Industrial Development Corporation,

G.R. No. 150936, 18 August 2004


 City of Manila v. Chinese Community of

Manila, 40 Phil. 349 (1919)

 National Power Corp. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 16804, 12 August 2004

 Metropolitan Water District v. De los

Angeles, 55 Phil. 776 (1931)

d. Parties
 De Knecht v. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos.

108015 & 109234, 20 May 1998

e. Prohibition on Motion to Dismiss

f. Right to Entry/ Writ of Possession


 Biglang-Awa v. Bacalla, G.R. Nos.

139927 and 139936, 22 November 2000

 Robern Development Corp. v. Quitain,

G.R. No. 135042, 23 September 1999

g. Mandatory Appointment of
Commissioners; Exception
 Manila Electric Co. v. Pineda, G.R. No.

59791, 13 February 1992


 National Power Corp. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 16804, 12 August 2004

 Province of Davao Del Norte v.

Buenaventura-Navarro, G.R. No. 208771

(Notice), 27 February 2019

h. Just Compensation
 Republic v. Vda. de Castellvi, G.R. No. L20620, 15 August 1974

 B.H. Berkenkotter & Co. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 89980, 14 December

1992

 Evergreen Manufacturing Corp. v.

Republic, G.R. Nos. 218628 & 218631, 6

September 2017

 National Power Corp. v. Heirs of

Sangkay, G.R. No. 165828, 24 August

2011

 Republic v. Salvador, G.R. no. 205428, 7

June 2017

 Republic v. Fetalvero, G.R. No. 198008, 4

February 2009

i. LGU expropriation
 Star Special Watchman & Detective

Agency, Inc. v. Puerto Princesa City, G.R.

No. 181792, 21 April 2014

j. Appeal

k. Reacquisition of expropriated property


 Mactan-Cebu International Airport

Authority v. Lozada, Sr., G.R. No. 176625,

25 February 2010

l. RA 10752 – Right of Way Act and its

Implementing Rules

- Coverage

- Modes of Acquiring Real Property

- Defendants

- Expropriation Proceedings

- Immediate Possession of Premises

- Payment of Interest

- Relocation of Informal Settlers

- Writ of Demolition

9. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage


a. Jurisdiction
b. Nature and Definition; Compare with
Extrajudicial Foreclosure – Act No. 3135
 Marilag v. Martinez, G.R. No. 201892, 22

July 2015

 Bacharach Motor Co., Inc. v. Icarañgal,

68 Phil. 287 (1939)

c. Stages/ Phases
 Huerta Alba Resort, Inc. v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No. 128567, 1 September

2000

 Cuyco v. Cuyco, G.R. No. 168736, 19

April 2006

 Rehabilitation Finance Corporation v,.

Alto Surety & Insurance Co., G.R. No. L14303, 24 March 1960

 Baysa v. Plantilla, G.R. No. 159271, 13

July 2015

 Sulit v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

119247, 17 February 1997

 Marilag v. Martinez, G.R. No. 201892, 22

July 2015
d. Appeal

10. Partition
a. Jurisdiction

- Agarrado v. Librando-Agarrado, G.R No 212413, 6 June 2018

b. Nature and Definition

- Art. 484, 494, 495, 1083, 1062, Civil

Code

- Art. 99, 126, 101, 134, 145, 154, 159,

Family Code

 Heirs of Ernesto Morales v. Agustin, G.R.

No. 224849, 6 June 2018

 De Pedro v. Romasan Development

Corporation, G.R. No. 194751, 26

November 2014

c. Phases/ Stages

 Agarrado v. Librando-Agarrado, G.R No.

212413, 6 June 2018

 Ignacio v. Reyes, G.R. No. 213192, 12

July 2017

 Quilatan v. Heirs of Quilatan, G.FR. No.

183059, 28 August 2009


 Heirs of Panfilo F. Abalos v. Bucal, G.R.

No. 156224, 19 February 2008

 Maglucot-Aw v. Maglucot, G.R. No.

132518, 28 March 2000

 De Mesa v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

109387, 25 April 1994

 Dadizon v. Bernades, G.R. No. 172367, 5

June 2009

You might also like