Monopoly Real Life Examples: Example 1
Monopoly Real Life Examples: Example 1
Monopoly Real Life Examples: Example 1
Example 1
1.Carnegie Steel Company created by Andrew Carnegie (now U.S. Steel). From the late 19th century
to the early time of the 20th century, Carnegie Steel Company maintained singular control over the
supply of steel over the market. Carnegie Steel Company during the period of monopoly was
effectively setting the price for the steel nationally without the free market competition. The
regulation of the Government was not present initially. Andrew Carnegie was successful in creating
the monopoly for a long time in the steel industry after which J.P. Morgan took possession of the
company by buying it and melded the same into the U.S. Steel
Example 2 – Luxottica
Most of us have never heard of the company ‘Luxottica’ despite the fact they are the biggest
manufacturer of glasses in the world. It is founded in the year 1961 in one of the small villages in
Italy. It started a business at the International level in the early ‘80s and it started taking over the
other eyewear company whichever it can afford. Many sunglasses companies of international levels
are selling their sunglasses in their own brands like Ray-Ban, Vogue, Killer Loop, T3, Armani, etc. It
has also controlled the prime vision care provider in the United States such as Eye Med and Vision
Care. It is one of the examples of a monopoly.
Example 3 – Google
One can’t even think of the internet layout without Google. Its competitors are Microsoft and Yahoo
but they own a very small share in the market that too in the downward trend. Google makes the
majority of money from advertising and the same can be clearly seen that it controls 60% of the
global advertising revenue. It has a good revenue generation through the process of harvesting user
data with the track over our online activity and popping up with the advertisement as per our
searching history and locations. Smaller advertisers lag as they are not having the level of user data
as Google is having. Thus Google undoubtedly is one of the largest monopolies in present in the
world. The company, in fact, monopolizes several other different markets in the world.
At the earlier time when there were a lot of oil companies who were manufacturing most of their
finds, companies hardly bother of environment and pump waste product directly into the river
without undergoing to the cost of researching proper disposal. They were also using a shoddy
pipeline which was very prone to leakage. Later standard oil started creating a monopoly along with
developing infrastructure aiming to cut down the cost and dependency. Despite the eventual
breakup of the company in 1911, the government understands that this upcoming monopoly will
create a reliable setup, infrastructure and deliver low cost. The profits of the standard oil and a good
trend of dividend helped in gaining investor trust and thereby resulting in more investment from the
investors which helped it to grow larger further.
There are ample of examples for oligopoly. In the current scenario, the number of these type of
players is increasing. It is totally the opposite of a monopoly. These allow multiple competitors to
coexist. So consumers are having a list of companies for a particular sector. These are prevalent and
that too within the wide cross-section of industries. Some of the common industries sectors where
we can see it are Aviation Industry, Media Industry, Pharma Industry, Telecom Industry, Media etc.
Oligopoly Example #1 – Technology Industry
The computer technology sector shows us the best example of oligopoly. Let us list out the
computer operating software and we will find out the two prominent name Apple and Windows.
These two players have managed the majority of the market share for long. There is one more player
in this oligopoly named Linux Open Source. But apart from these three, there are hardly any players
in this sector as they command almost 100 % of the global market share. The computer can be of
any brand but the operating system will be for sure from any of the aforesaid three. They have
achieved this stage because of two primary factors.
One is the brand image and trust they have created in the eyes of consumers and secondly the lack
of players who can stand in front of these 3 at the same time building trust among consumers.
Moreover, their dominance in this sector gets increased as the majority of computer software’s
made are compatible with these three operating systems which in turn is making this oligopoly self-
sustaining. Their innovations into their sector also keep them unique which helps them create an
ecosystem that completely sustains their growth
The same is the case for an operating system for smartphones where the majority market share is
captured by Android & iOS. These companies are coexisting without creating a threat to others
It means if they keep the same primetime on every channel then their viewership will be diversified.
In that case, not a single player will be able to take the edge. So what they follow through their unity
is looking out for the share of the same viewer base by deciding the prime time for individual
channels mutually. By following this even though their scalability of the TV channels will get limited
to an extent but across those ranges, all the players can co-exist and that too with relative gains.
They are not supposed to face any cut-throat competition. As a result of this oligopoly, the relative
cost will also come down for new foray.
It can be seen in their decisions of launching small cars, the sequence in which they rose the prices
of cars which clarifies that these three players took a united and well thought of strategy. One may
distinguish among the three on the basis of prices but on the basis of features, all are distinct. The
trend between the periods 1960 – late 1970 was like Chrysler will announce the price rise first;
second price rise will be announced by the General Motors. The strategy was that General Motors
will announce in price rise less than that of Chrysler. Then Chrysler will reduce its price to General
Motor’s level. Further Ford joins them in raising the price and all three settle to the price of the ford.
However, this oligopoly is blamed as the main cause of the downturn in the US automobile sector.
Patents are being registered for the drugs which are in circulation which enable easy resolution of
the issue at the same time it protects the new drug from potential competition. As a result, they are
able to create an edge from their experiences which will help them in succeeding in the future as
well. The oligopoly here works as a symbiotic fashion.
Conclusion
The aforesaid examples of oligopoly highlight the different aspects. The economic arrangement is
the primary means which will help in getting a level playing field. But at the same time from the
examples mentioned above, we can conclude that oligopoly is not conducive to raising a healthy
competition. The downfall of the US automobile sector is a burning example discussed in example
three related to the Automobile sector. Here each player aims at pulling the other down and focuses
less on innovations.
The new entrant cannot easily enter because of barriers. Moreover, the high concentration reduces
consumer choices and the consumers are being treated for granted by the companies. At the same
time oligopoly helps in lowering the average cost of production of goods. If the extra profit
margin is being used in innovations then this suits companies having high R&D costs.
The two globally reputed coffee chains that both sell a similar product ‘coffee’ but the coffee is not
the same at both the outlets. A Difference is created by the quality of coffee, customer service or
hospitality, and prices. Both the coffee houses are healthy competing to serve better products and
services.
However coffee is not just served by Starbucks or Costa but there are various big global coffee chains
other than these two like Dunkin Donuts, McDonalds or McCafe, etc.
Non-Price Competition
Note that one of the defining traits of a monopolistic competitive market is that there is a significant
amount of non-price competition. I.e. firms cannot compete upon prices
For example, a street vendor is offering coffee at $0.5 per coffee cup but Starbucks charges about $5
for a single cup of coffee. Now the street vendor cannot compete Starbucks on the basis of charging
low prices because Starbucks differentiate its product through the quality of their coffee, expensive
crockery, better hospitality, the infrastructure of their coffee houses, etc.
For example, Costa Coffee has higher rates as compared to Starbucks and they both charge much
higher prices than a street vendor. However, the demand for coffee is very high since every coffee
seller gets its customers.
Governmental regulations are less, other than essential food quality standards; the coffee business
has no other strict governmental obligations to be followed.
Example #2 – Farmers
From coffee shops, we next come to coffee producers. This example talks about farmers who
produce food for the entire 7.7 billion population of the world and about 80% of the world’s food.
Farmers also work in a monopolistic competitive market where a large number of farmers (there are
around 570 million farmers all around the world) produce various similar crops which can be
differentiated based on quality, size, etc.
Let’s take the example of a very famous summer crop called ‘Mango’ (Mangifera indica).
The retail industry consists of vast markets that include various goods and brands with a single
common goal of selling their products rapidly.
Wal-Mart is the biggest retailer in the world. It has recently entered into the E-commerce business
by acquiring Flipkart, India’s largest e-commerce company. Amazon is the biggest online retailer in
the world. And Alibaba is another major global giant in the retail industry.
Product Differentiation
In the retail industry, companies can differentiate their products by using color, size, features,
performance, and accessibility. Companies use heavy advertising and apply various marketing
strategies to make their product look more appealing to customers than other similar products.
Differentiation can also be made through a better distribution structure. Online selling provides an
advantage over other retailers.