Law Negotiable Instrument 1881 Notes
Law Negotiable Instrument 1881 Notes
INDEX
Day 1 : Meaning of Negotiable Instrument & Promissory Note
yDay
1 : 1:
Meaning of of
Meaning Negotiable Instrument
Negotiable & Promissory
Instrument Note
& Promissory Note
Types of
Negotiable
Instruments
It does not mean that other instruments are not negotiable in India, instruments like
Government Promissory Note, Shah Jog Hundi, Delivery Order or Delivery Receipt are also
negotiable by custom or promissory note.
Essential Characteristics of Negotiable Instruments
1. Transferable Ad Infinitum.
2. Negotiability Holder in Due Course [HDC] gets a good title free from defects irrespective of
title of transferor. Good faith plus before maturity plus for consideration is equals to Holder
in Due Course. Negotiability is an Independent tittle.
3. HDC can sue in his own name.
4. Negotiable Instrument in writing, stamped, dated and signed and may be used as an
evidence of debt.
5. It must contain either a promise or order to pay money.
6. The order or promise must be unconditional. (Conditions must be Universal Truth)
7. The promise or order to pay must consist of money only. Also, the sum payable must be
certain.
8. Presumptions as to Negotiable Instrument (Section 118)
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Types of
Negotiable
Instruments
Promissory
Notes
To pay a
An Instrument Not a Must contain Signed By Maker certain sum of
money
Features:
1. It must be in writing, sign by the maker on any part of the instrument.
2. It must be stamped.
3. There must be an express promise to pay. Mere acknowledgement of debt is insufficient.
Example: I acknowledge myself to be indebted to B in ₹ 1,000, to be paid on demand, for
value received. (Valid promissory note as the promise to pay is definite)
Example: “Mr. B I.O.U ₹ 1,000.” – Invalid promissory note as there is no promise to pay. It is
just an acknowledgement of debt.
4. Amount must be certain.
Example: “I promise to pay B ₹ 500 and all other sums which shall be due to
him.”- Promissory note invalid as the amount payable is not certain.
5. The promise must be unconditional and it must not be linked to an unconditional event.
Example: I promise to pay B ₹ 500 seven days after my marriage with C. (the promissory
note is invalid as marriage with C may or may not happen.)
Example: I promise to pay B ₹ 500 on D’s death – as the death of D is certain, promise is
unconditional. Thus, the promissory note is valid.
Example: I promise to pay B ₹ 500 on D’s death, provided D leaves me enough to pay that
sum. Invalid promissory note as promise is dependent on D leaving behind money which
is not certain.
6. It must be made for money only and not for goods.
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Example: I promise to pay B ₹ 500 and to deliver to him my black horse on 1st January
next. – It is not a valid promissory note, as the promisor needs to deliver its black horse
which is not money.
7. Maker and Payee must be certain, definite and different persons.
8. There are 2 parties:-
Maker [Cannot be a Minor]
Payee [Can be a Minor]
Let’s check your understanding
Examples :
A signs instruments in the following terms :
a) “I promise to pay B or order Rs.500”
b) “I acknowledge myself to be indebted to B in Rs.1000 to be paid on demand for value
received”.
c) “Mr. B I.O.U Rs.1000”.
d) “I promise to pay B Rs.500 and all other sums which shall be due to him”.
e) “I promise to pay B Rs.500 first deducting there out any money which he may owe me”.
f) “I promise to pay B Rs.500 after my marriage with C”.
g) “I promise to pay B Rs.500 on D’s Death provided that D lefts me enough to pay that sum.
h) “I promise to pay B Rs.500 and to deliver him black horse on 1st January next.
Bill of
Exchange
Signed by Directing a
An Instrument Must contain
Maker certain person
to the order of
Unconditional To pay certain the bearer of
In writting a certain
order sum of money. instrument
person or
4.Section 6 Cheque
A “cheque” is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker and is not payable otherwise
than on demand. It includes the electronic image of a truncated cheque and a cheque in the
electronic form.
(a)Cheque in the electronic form: means a cheque drawn in electronic form by using any
computer resource, and signed in secure system with digital signature (with/without
biometric signature) and asymmetric crypto system or electronic signature as the case may
be.
(b) A truncated cheque means a cheque truncated during the course of clearing cycle,
either by clearing house or by bank whether paying or receiving payment, immediately on
generation of electronic image for transmission, substituting the further physical
movement of cheque in writing.
Payable on demand means - It should be payable whenever the holder chooses to present
it to the drawee (the banker).
The expression “Banker” includes any person acting as a banker and any post office
saving bank.
Parties to Cheque:
1. Drawer: The person who makes the cheque.
2. Drawee: The specific bank on whom cheque is drawn. In case of cheque, drawee is
always banker.
3. Payee: The person named in the instrument, to whom or to whose order the money
is, by the instrument, directed to be paid.
Essentials:
1. All essentials of bill of exchange is to be satisfied.
2. Always on a specified banker. ***
3. Always payable on demand without any days of grace. ***
*Above two additional features distinguish a cheque from bill. Thus, all cheques are
bills while all bills are not cheques.
4. It does not require any stamping or acceptance.
5. Parties:-
Maker
Paying Banker
Payee
6. If minor draws a cheque, it shall not be held liable.
Cheque must be dated [after 3 months - stale]. A future date cheque is called Post Dated
Cheque [PDC], validity period of every cheque is 3 months.
DISTINCTION BETWEEN A CHEQUE and BILL OF EXCHANGE
S.NO. CHEQUE BILL OF EXCHANGE
An acceptance is the signature of the drawee of a bill who has signed his assent upon the
bill and delivered it.
Classification
Of Negotiable
Instrument
(i) Bearer Instrument: Payee is not mentioned. Transferable by delivery. Last end kept
blank.
(ii) Order Instrument: Payee is mentioned. Transferable by endorsement plus delivery.
(iii) Inland Instrument (Section 11): Must satisfy two conditions:
Made in India, and
Payable in India or Drawn on a Resident of India.
Example:
A promissory note made in Kolkata and payable in Mumbai.
A bill drawn in Varanasi on a person resident in Jodhpur (although it is stated to be
payable in Singapore)
(iv) Foreign Instrument (Section 12): Any such instrument not so drawn, made or
made payable shall be deemed to be foreign instrument in other words.
(a)Bills drawn outside India and made payable in or drawn upon any person resident
in any country outside India.
(b) Bills drawn outside India and made payable in India, or drawn upon any person
resident in India.
(c)Bill drawn in India made payable outside India or drawn upon any resident outside
India, but not made payable in India.
For Example:
FF
Made in Chennai / Payable in Chennai
are foreign bills.
Made in Delhi / on Mr. B (resident)
(v) Demand Instrument or At Sight (Section 19): An instrument where maturity date is
not specified. It is payable on demand without any days of grace. If a bill is payable at
sight the date on which it is presented is excluded.
(vi) Time Instruments or After Sight(Section 20): Where the time of maturity is
specified clearly, 3 days of grace are given in such bill, if the maturity date is pre-
declared holiday then previous business day, if a maturity date is suddenly declared
holiday then the next day. Depends on Happening of ‘Certain’ event.
Example 2: A owes a certain sum of money to B. A does not know the exact amount
and hence he makes out a blank cheque in favour of B. signs and delivers it to B with a
request to fill up the amount due, payable by him. B fills up fraudulently the amount
larger than the amount due, payable by A and endorses the cheque to C in full payment
of dues of B. Cheque of A is dishonoured. Referring to the provisions of the Negotiable
Instruments Act 1881, discuss the right of B and C.
(vii) Inchoate Instrument: An inchoate Instrument is one where a person signs and
delivers to an another person a paper stamped in accordance with the law relating to
negotiable instrument then enforce, either wholly blank or having incomplete
particulars, thereby giving authority to the holder to complete it. It is called inchoate
instrument. In such case immediate parties can recover only upto actual intention.
However, HDC can recover upto full value of stamp.
(viii) Ambiguous Instrument: is an unclear instrument. It is an instrument where
instruction of the maker is not specific or it is not clear whether it is promissory note
or bill of exchange.
PRACTICE QUESTIONS:-
Que. 1 A draws a bill on B. B accepts the bill without any consideration. The bill is
transferred to C without consideration. C transferred it to D for value. Decide-
(i) Whether D can sue the prior parties of the bill, and
(ii) Whether the prior parties other than D have any right of action inter se?
Give your answer in reference to the Provisions of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Hint:
(i) D can sue any of the parties i.e. A, B or C, as D arrived a good title on it being taken with
consideration.
(ii) The prior parties before D i.e., A, B and C have no right of action inter se.
Que. 2 P draws a bill on Q for ₹ 10,000. Q accepts the bill. On maturity, the bill was
dishonored by non-payment. P files a suit against Q for payment of ₹ 10,000. Q proved that
the bill was accepted for value of ₹ 7,000 and as an accommodation to the plaintiff for the
balance amount i.e. ₹ 3,000. Referring to the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881 decide whether P would succeed in recovering the whole amount of the bill?
Hint: P would succeed to recover ₹ 7,000 only from Q.
(x) Fictitious Bill: A fictitious bill is one in which the payee does not exist. However, if such
N.I. received by holder in due course, the acceptor cannot deny the liability on the same,
provided the bill is drawn and endorsed in same hand writing.
Example: X draws a bill on Y but signs it in the fictitious name of Z. The bill is payable to
the order of Z. The bill is duly accepted by Y. M obtains the bill from X thus, becoming its
holder in due course. Can Y avoid payment of the bill? Decide in the light of the
provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Hint: Y cannot avoid payment by raising the plea that the drawer (Z) is fictitious. The only
condition is that the signature of Z as drawer and as endorser must be in the same
handwriting.
(xi) Duplicate Bill: If the original N.I. is lost before it’s overdue, the holder can demand
from the drawer to given him another bill of the same tenure. However, the drawer may
demand indemnity or security in case of any misuse of the bill.
If the drawer refuses to give such duplicate bill, he may be compelled to do so under law.
(xii) Hundi : A bill of exchange drawn in an oriental language /local/Vernacular language.
Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 applies to Hundis. There was no local usage of trade or
custom prevailing in area where Hundi is drawn. However, if any local custom is
prevalent. ‘That law’ will apply to Hundi and NI Act not apply.
Eg: Nam Jog Hundi, Dhani Jog Hundi , Darshani Hundi , Miadi Hundi Peth Perpeth &
Khokha.
Example: Bharat executed a promissory note in favour of Bhushan for ₹ 5 crores. The said
amount was payable three days after sight. Bhushan, on maturity, presented the
promissory note on 1st January, 2017 to Bharat. Bharat made the payments on 4th
January, 2017. Bhushan wants to recover interest for one day from Bharat. Advise Bharat,
in the light of provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, whether he is liable to
pay the interest for one day?
Answer: Bharat is not liable to pay the interest for one day. Bharat paid rightly “three days
after sight”. Since the bill was presented on 1st January, Bharat was required to pay only
on the 4th and not on 3rd January, as contended by Bhushan.
8(d) When day of maturity is a holiday
When the day on which a promissory note or bill of exchange is at maturity is a public
holiday, the instrument shall be deemed to be due on the next preceding business day.
Explanation: The expression “Public Holiday” includes Sundays and any other day
declared by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, to be a public
holiday.
Que. 1 State briefly the rules laid down under the Negotiable Instruments Act for
determining the date of maturity of a bill of exchange.
Que. 2 Ascertain the date of maturity of a bill payable hundred days after sight and which
is presented for sight on 4th May, 2018.
Hint: 14th August, 2018.
8.HDC Vs Holder
Holder In Due Course
(a)HDC is a person who is holder with 3 attributes:-
Good faith,
Before maturity, and
Consideration.
(b)He will get good title irrespective of title of transferor. If the title of transferor is bad or
defective yet HDC gets the good title.
Example 1: A draws a cheque for ₹ 5,000 and hands it over to B by way of gift. B is a
holder but not a holder in due course as he does not get the cheque for value and
consideration. His title is good and bonafide. As a holder he is entitled to receive ₹ 5000
from the bank on whom the cheque is drawn.
Example 2: On a Bill of Exchange for ₹ 1 lakh, X’s acceptance to the Bill is forged. ‘A’ takes
the Bill from his customer for value and in good faith before the Bill becomes payable.
State with reasons whether ‘A’ can be considered as a ‘Holder in due course’ and whether
he (A) can receive the amount of the Bill from ‘X’.
any person
entitled in his own name to the possession thereof, and
to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto.
(b)Holder gets the title of the transferor. If the title of transferor is defective, holder will
also get defective title.
Example: A person who finds or steals a bearer instrument or takes an instrument
under forged endorsement is not holder: The reason is that holder of a negotiable
instrument must have right to receive or recover the money thereon from the parties
thereto.
Effects of Being HDC (Section 9)
Case 1:
Case 2:
Case 3:
Case 4:
Case 5:
Case 6:
Case 7:
Case 8:
Case 9:
Case 10:
Discuss with reasons, whether the following persons can be called as a ‘holder’ under the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881:
Hint: (i) Yes, (ii) No, (iii) No, (iv) No, (v) No.
Privileges of being a holder in due course:
(i) In case of Inchoate Instrument: HDC can claim full amount of N.I. (Not exceeding
amount covered by Stamp) even though such amount is in excess of the amount authorised
by the person delivering an Inchoate N.I.
Example: A signs his name on a blank but stamped instrument which he gives to B with an
authority to fill up as a note for a sum of ₹ 3 000 only. But B fills it for ₹ 5,000. B then
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
transfers it to C for a consideration of ₹ 5000 who takes it in good faith. Here in the case, C
is entitled to recover the full amount of the instrument because he is a holder in due
course whereas B, being a holder cannot recover the amount because he filled in the
amount in excess of his authority.
(ii) In case of fictitious bill: HDC can enforce payment of a fictitious bill and drawer cannot
deny liability.
(iii) In case of conditional bill HDC will get good title and is entitled to amount of bill even if
conditions are broken.
(iv) In case of bill or N.I. is drawn illegally or through coercion or fraud HDC get good title
irrespective of title of transferor.
Difference between Holder and Holder in Due Course
S.no. Holder Holder in Due Course
1 Holder is a person who is entitled to HDC is a person who is a holder with 3
N.I. in his own name. attributable: (a) Good faith (b) Before
maturity (c) For consideration.
2 Holder gets a title of the transferor, if HDC gets a good title irrespective of the
transferor’s title is defected holder transferor’s title. If transferor’s title is bad
will also get defected title. or defected yet HDC gets a good title.
3 A holder may become payee of an Whereas HDC is one who acquires
instrument even without possession for consideration.
consideration.
4 He may become the possessor before It become before the amount thereon
or after maturity. becomes payable.
5 He cannot enforce his rights against He can enforce his rights against all the
all the prior parties. prior parties.
6 Each holder is not a holder in due Each holder in due course is also a holder.
course.
9.Negotiation
Negotiation is:-
Passing of possession
With intention to pass title.
It must be transferred in such a manner that the transferee becomes holder thereof.
Example: A was the holder of a cheque of ₹ 1,00,000 payable to bearer. He delivered this
cheque to C to keep it in his (C) safe custody. In this case there is no negotiation of cheque
from A to C because the transfer of cheque to C makes him bailee only and not the holder of
the cheque. The transfer must be made with an intention to transfer the title of the
instrument to the Transferee.
(a)Negotiation by delivery (Section 47):
A promissory note or bill of exchange or cheque payable to bearer is negotiated by
simple delivery.
If an instrument is delivered with some condition attached, it is called conditional
delivery. In such a case the property in the instrument does not pass to the transferee,
till the condition is fulfilled.
However, if such instrument is further endorsed to HDC (who accepts instrument
without notice of the condition) then negotiation is valid. HDC is entitled to recover
money even though such condition is not satisfied.
Examples:
(i) A, the holder of a negotiable instrument payable to bearer, delivers it to B’s agent
to keep for B. The instrument has been negotiated.
(ii) Y delivers a bearer cheque to N on the condition that N will not encash or
negotiate the cheque unless N supplies goods to Y. There is a conditional delivery
by Y to N and the property in the cheque will pass to N only after supplying the
goods. If the endorsee i.e. N encashes the cheque before supplying the goods then
Y can recover the money so paid to him.
But if N negotiates the cheque to S, who takes the same in good faith and for value,
then S becomes the holder in due course and can rightfully encash the cheque.
(b)Negotiation by endorsement and delivery (Section 48):
Example: X, who is the holder of a negotiable instrument writes on the back thereof: “pay
to Y or order” and signs the instrument. In such a case, X is deemed to have en-dorsed the
instrument to Y. If X delivers the instrument to Y, X ceases to be the holder and Y becomes
the holder.
PARTIES:
Endorser: The person who endorses the instrument is called Endorser.
Endorsee: The person to whom the instrument is endorsed is called Endorsee.
Features of a valid Endorsement
It must be in writing.
It must be signed by the endorser or else the endorsement shall be invalid.
It is completed by the delivery of the instrument.
It must be made by the holder of the instrument.
Types Of Endorsement:
1. Blank or General Endorsement (only signature): When the endorser just puts his
signature without specifying the payee.
2. Full or Special Endorsement (name and signature): When along with endorser’s
signature, the name of payee is mentioned. It remains transferrable by delivery and
endorsement.
3. Restrictive Endorsement: An endorsement which restricts the right of further
negotiation. Thus, in case of restrictive endorsement if the endorsee further
negotiates the instrument then the subsequent endorsee will not get better title than
the party delivers the instrument.
Example: D signs the following endorsements on different negotiable
instruments payable to bearer:
(a) Pay the contents to G only
(b) Pay G for my use
(c) Pay G or order for the account of H
These endorsements exclude the right of further negotiation by G.
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Conditional
Endorsement
Liability
Facultative Sans-Frais
Sans Recourse dependent upon
Endorsement Endorsement
a contingency
(a) Sans Recourse: Endorser relieves himself from the liability to all subsequent
endorsement. [Mere pass palat kar mat aana]
(b) Facultative Endorsement: In case of dishonour Notice is compulsory to prior
party. if notice is not given to prior party, he is discharged.
In facilitative endorsement Endorser waives his right to receive notice of the
dishonour.
(c)Sans-Frais Endorsement: Endorser relieves himself from any liability with respect
to any expenses that may be incurred in case of dishonour of negotiable instrument.
(d) Liability dependent upon a contingency: It is an endorsement where
Endorser makes his liability dependent on happening of some event.
The holder of a negotiable instrument endorsed in blank may,
Convert the endorsement in blank into full,
Without signing his own name, by writing above the endorser’s signature’
A direction to pay to any other person as endorsee,
In such a case, the holder does not incur the responsibility of an endorser.
Example: A is the holder of a bill endorsed by B in blank. A writes over B’s signature,
the word ‘Pay to C or order’. A is not liable as an endorser but such writing operates
as an endorsement in full from B to C.
Liability Of Endorser
Every endorser of a negotiable instrument is liable to every subsequent party to it
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Parties to
the
Instruments
Every person through
duly authorised agent
11(a) Minor:
As a minor agreement is void, he cannot bind himself by becoming a party to a
negotiable instrument.
But he may Draw, endorse, deliver and negotiate a negotiable instrument so as to
bind all parties except himself, that is he may operate as a channel to convey title and
liabilities but not to originate it.
Example: A draws a cheque in favour of M, a minor. M endorses the same in favour of X.
The cheque is dishonoured by the bank on grounds of inadequate funds. Here in this case,
M being a minor may draw, endorse, deliver and negotiate the instrument so as to bind all
parties except himself. Therefore, M is not liable. X can, thus, proceed against A.
Que. 1 Mr. S Venkatesh drew a cheque in favor of M who was sixteen years old. M settled
his rental due by endorsing the cheque in favor of Mrs. A the owner of the house in which
he stayed. The cheque was dishonored when Mrs. A presented it for payment on grounds
of inadequacy of funds. Advise Mrs. A how she can proceed to collect her dues.
Hint: Mrs. A can proceed against Mr. S venkatesh to collect her dues.
A person capable of contracting may make, draw, accept, endorse, deliver and
negotiate a bill, note or cheque either himself or through a duly authorized agent
acting in his name.
But a general authority to transact business and to receive and discharge debts does
not confer upon an agent the power of accepting or indorsing bill of exchange so as
to bind his principal.
Presentment
Presentment means bringing the bill in the knowledge of the parties. It is of 3 types:-
i. Presentment of bill of exchange for Acceptance.
ii. Presentment of promissory note for sight.
iii. Presentment of negotiable instrument for Payment.
It must be presented for acceptance within a specified time. However, if the bill
has no date or time specify for presentment, it must be presented within
reasonable time after it’s drawn in business hours on a business day. If such
presentment is not done, the prior parties are not liable to the holder.
Where a bill of exchange is presented to Drawee for acceptance, the holder must
allow the Drawee 48 hours of time (excluding public holidays) to consider
whether he is willing to accept is or not.
However, drawee cannot be found after reasonable search, the bill treated as
dishonour also presentment can be done either personally or through agent or
even through registered post, if it’s usage or custom of the area.
ii. Presentment of promissory note for sight:
P/N payable at a certain period after sight
reasonable time
Presentment for payment must be made during the business hours if Drawee is
other than banker, or
Within banking hours if Drawee is a banker.
Presentment before maturity is not a valid presentment.
A promissory note payable by installments must be presented for payment on
the third day after the date fixed for payment of each installment (thus every
installment is entitled to three days of grace).
If a single installment is not paid the whole of the note can be treated as
dishonoured by non-payment.
Section 75A : When Payments Unnecessary
Or
Or make part payment
Closer place of business
during business hours.
Or
Or promises to pay
If place specified person
attends it.
Place of presentment:
A Negotiable instrument must be presented for payment at the decided place.
Acceptor will be discharged in case an instrument is not presented at the
specified place.
However, if no place is specified then bill must be presented for the payment at the
place of business or at usual place of residence, of the maker, drawee or acceptor
thereof, as the case may be.
“Specified place” implies the precise address of the place; the mere mention of a
big city like ‘Madras’ is not sufficient.
Interest for late Payment
Discharge of
Discharge of Party
Instrument
(a) By Cancellation: If the holder of an instrument or his agent cancels name of a party
on the instrument with an intention to discharge him then such party and all
subsequent parties are discharged from liability to the holder.
(b) By release: If the order of an instrument releases any party to the instrument by any
method other than cancellation then the party so released is discharged from liability.
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Needed
Authorization
Material
Alteration
Not needed
Alteration
Authoriaztion
Non-material
Alteration
1.Material Change
(a)If the alteration is unintentional and due to pure accident (Eg. Accidental disfigurement
of document).
(b)Alteration made by a stranger without consent of holder and without any fraud and
negligence on his part.
(c)An alteration made to correct a clerical error or a mistake, thus if instead of 1823, the
date entered 1832, the agent of drawer held entitled to correct mistake. Such correction is
deemed to be giving effect to the original intention of the parties.
(d)Alteration made to carry out common intention of original parties is permitted by Sec.
87. For example, where the words “or order” after the name of payee, inserted
subsequently [Byrom v Thomson (1839) 11 A&E 31]
(e)Alteration with the consent of the parties liable thereto.
(f)An alteration made before the completion or the issue of negotiable Instrument.
(g)A material alteration doesn’t affect the liability of those parties who become liable after
the alteration is made. Sec. 88 provides that the acceptor or indorser is bound by his
acceptance or indorsement notwithstanding any previous alteration of the instrument.
(h)An alteration which is not material e.g. when a bill payable to bearer is converted to bill
payable to order/or an incomplete name of a person converted into the complete name of
same person.
Sol:(a) Yes. (b) No. (c) Yes. (d) No. (e) Yes
a) Dishonour by Non-acceptance
A bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance, if the bill is duly presented for acceptance but
not accepted. This happens in the following cases:
Bill is not accepted by drawee within 48 hours of presentment of bill for acceptance.
Drawee gives a qualified acceptance.
When presentment for acceptance is excused and bill is not accepted.
Drawee is incompetent to contract.
Drawee is :-
A fictitious person, or
After reasonably search cannot be found.
Effect: Holder of the bill gets an immediate right to sue all the prior parties without
waiting for maturity of bill.
Ques1. What are the circumstances under which a bill of exchange can be dishonoured by
non-acceptance?
b) Dishonour by Non-payment
A promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque is said to be dishonored by non-payment-
When the maker of the promissory note,
Acceptor of the bill, or
Drawee of the cheque
Makes default in payment upon presentment.
Note: Also, a promissory note or bill of exchange is dishonoured by non-payment when
presentment for payment is excused by the maker of the note or acceptor of the bill and
the note or bill remains unpaid at or after maturity.
NOTICE OF DISHONOUR
Noting:
Noting means recording the fact of dishonour of a negotiable instrument on the
instrument.
Noting is done by a person officially designated for this purpose and such person
is known as Notary Public.
Requirement of Noting:
When a promissory note or bill of exchange has been dishonoured by non-
acceptance or non-payment.
The holder may cause such dishonour to be noted, by a notary public.
Noting must be made within a reasonable time after dishonour and must specify
the date of dishonour.
Contents of noting:
A dishonoured bill is handed over to a notary public who represents it again for
acceptance or payment as the case may be, and if the drawee or acceptor still refuses to
accept or pay the bill, the notary public records:
Date of dishonour
Fact of dishonour
Reason for dishonour,
if the instrument has not been expressly dishonoured, the reason why the holder
treats it as dishonour
APT BEST COMMERCE CLASSES FOR CA & CS CONTACT NO:9755557307 APT|BHOPAL
CA RACHNA PARAKH DUBEY
Notary charges
Note: Noting is optional in case of inland bills and is compulsory in the case of foreign
bills. Since noting provides an additional evidence of dishounour, it is better to get the
dishonoured bill noted.
Protest (Section 100)
Protest is formal certificate issued by the Notary Public about the dishonour of a bill or
note. Protest must be done within a reasonable time.
Requirement of Protest:
When a promissory note or bill of exchange has been dishonoured by non-
acceptance or non-payment.
The holder may cause the fact not only to be noted, but also to be certified by a
Notary Public that the bill has been dishonoured.
Such a certificate is referred to as a protest.
Contents of Protest:
Protest is based upon noting. In order to be valid, a protest must contain all the
following particulars:
Name of the person for whom and against whom protest has been protested.
Date of dishonour
Fact of dishonour
Place and time of dishonor
Signature of notary public
Yes No
Punishment
If a cheque issued by the drawer is dishonoured or is returned by the bank unpaid due to
insufficiency of funds or the amount exceeding the arrangement made with the bank then
such person shall be deemed to have committed an offence and shall be punished with:-
(i) imprisonment for term upto 2 years, or
(ii) fine which may extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or both.
Process
Conditions
Provided that this section shall not apply, unless-
a) The cheque should be presented to the bank within a period of three months from
the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is
earlier.
b) The Payee or the HDC of the cheque (as the case may be) makes a demand in
writing for the payment of the said amount of money by giving a notice to the
drawer of the cheque, within 30 days of the receipt of information by him from
the bank regarding the return of the cheque as unpaid, and
c) The drawer of such cheque fails to make the payment of the said amount of
money to the payee or to the holder in due course of the cheque (as the case may
be), within fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice.
Presumption in favor of holder
It shall be presumed that the holder of a cheque received the cheque in whole or in
part, of any debt or other liability.
Thus, the burden to prove that the cheque in a particular case was not given to
discharge a legally enforceable debt or liability, lies on the drawer.
LIABILITY OF DRAWER OF CHEQUE IN CASE OF STOP PAYMENT
If drawer after having issued the cheque, informs drawee not to present the cheque for
payment and as well give a stop payment request to the bank in respect of the cheque
issued still section 138 would be applicable in case of non-payment.
OFFENCES BY A COMPANY Section 141
(i) If a person, committing the offence under section 138 is a company then every person
who is officer in default shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence.
(ii) Officer in default is a person who
was in charge and
responsible for the conduct of company’s business at the time of default.
(iii) However, such person shall not be liable if he proves that offence was committed
without his knowledge or that he was exercised all due diligence to prevent such
offence.
Also any nominee director who is employee of CG, SG or any financial institution
shall not be liable to be prosecuted under this section.
(iv) If any offence has been committed by a company and
it is proved that the offence has been committed
with the consent or is attributable to
any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company
then such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be
guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished
accordingly.
Example: A promoter who has borrowed a loan on behalf of company, who is neither a
director nor a person-in-charge, sent a cheque from the companies account to discharge
its legal liability. Subsequently, the cheque was dishonoured and the complaint was
lodged against him. Is he liable for an offence under section 138?
Hint: No. because he is not in charge of the affairs of the company.
Qu1.Bholenath drew a cheque in favour of Surendar. After having issued the cheque;
Bholenath requested Surendar not to present the cheque for payment and gave a stop
payment request to the bank in respect of the cheque issued to Surendar. Decide under
the provisions of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 whether the said acts of Bholenath
constitute an offence?
Hint: The act of Bholenath, i.e., his request of stop payment constitutes an offence under
the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Qu.2Explain the consequences if a cheque gets dishonoured for insufficiency of funds in
the account?
OFFENCES ARE COMPUNDABLE [Sec 147]
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 every
offence punishable under this Act shall be compoundable.
COGNIZANCE OF OFFENCES [Sec 142]
(b)Jurisdiction of court
If multiple cases are filled by 1 party on another all the subsequent cases shall be
transferred to the place of original case. Also the jurisdiction of court shall be decided as
follows:
(2) The interim compensation under sub-section (1) shall not exceed twenty
per cent. of the amount of the cheque.
(3) The interim compensation shall be paid within sixty days from the date of
the order under sub-section (1), or within such further period not exceeding thirty
days as may be directed by the Court on sufficient cause being shown by the drawer of
the cheque.
(4) If the drawer of the cheque is acquitted, the Court shall direct the complainant to
repay to the drawer the amount of interim compensation, with interest at the bank
rate as published by the Reserve Bank of India, prevalent at the beginning of the
relevant financial year, within sixty days from the date of the order, or within such
further period not exceeding thirty days as may be directed by the Court on
sufficient cause being shown by the complainant.
(5) The interim compensation payable under this section may be recovered as if it
were a fine under section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Objects of Crossing:
A crossing is a warning to the bank not to make payment of the crosses cheque over the
counter. Crossing operates as a caution to the paying banker.
(i) Crossing affects the mode of payment of cheque- The payment of a cross cheque
can be obtained only through a banker. Thus, crossing is a mode of assuring that
only the rightful holder (i.e. the person entitled to receive money) gets payment.
(ii) Crossing does not affect the transferability or negotiability of cheque- a
crossed cheque can be negotiated just the same way as an open cheque. A person
acquiring a crossed cheque in good faith becomes its holder in due course just as in
case of open cheque.
(iii) Crossing is a material alteration- but crossing of cheque by the holder does
not in any way affect his rights in respect of cheques.
Types of Crossing
Types of Crossing
(a) Cheque payable to order [Section 85(1)]: Where a cheque payable to order
purports to be endorsed by or on behalf of the payee, the banker is discharged by
payment in due course. The banker, in other words, can debit his customers account
even though the endorsement by the payee might turn out to be forgery or the
endorsement might have been placed by the payee’s agent without his authority.
(b) Cheque payable to bearer [Section 85(2
(c) Payment of cheque crossed generally)]: As regards bearer cheque the rule is “once
a bearer always a bearer”. A banker gets a good discharge by payment in due course of
the amount on a bearer cheque to the holder of the cheque. It does not matter whether
the apparent holder is the owner of the cheque or not.
(d) Payment of cheque crossed specially
(e) Payment in due course of crossed cheque Section 128
(f) Payment of crossed cheque out of due course Section 129
Question 1.X draws a bill on Y but signs it in the fictitious name of Z. The bill is payable to
the order of Z. The bill is duly accepted by Y. M obtains the bill from X thus becoming its
holder in due course. Can Y avoid payment of the bill ? decided in the light of the provision
of negotiable instrument act 1881.
Question 2(a). Explain the holder’s rights to duplicate the lost bill, as per the provisions of
the Negotiable Instrument Act,1881.
Question 2(b). On a bill of exchange for ₹1lakh, X’s acceptance to the bill is forged. A takes
the bill from his customer for value and in good faith before the Bill becomes payable.
Discuss with reasons whether A can be considered as a Holder in due course and whether A
can receive the amount of the bill from X. Give your answer as per the Negotiable
Instrument Act,1881.
(ii). Manoj draws a cheque in favour of Meera, a minor. Meera endorses the same in favour
of Sheila. The cheque is dishonored by the bank on grounds of inadequate funds. Discuss as
per the Negotiable Instrument Act,1881 whether Meera is liable.
Question 3.E is the holder of a bill of exchange made payable to the order of F. The bill of
exchange contains the following endorsements in blank:
First endorsement F
Second endorsement G
Third endorsement H
Fourth endorsement I
E strikes out without I’s consent, the endorsement by G and H. Decide with reasons whether
E is entitled to recover anything from I under the provisions of the Negotiable Instrument
Act,1881.
Question 4. What are the privileges of HDC?
Question 5. State the difference between bills of exchange, cheque and promissory note.
Question 6. (a) A draws a bill on B, B accepts the bill without any consideration. The bill is
transferred to C without consideration. C transferred it to D for value. Decide:
EXTRA POINTS
The Act was originally drafted in 1866 by the 3rd India Law Commission and
introduced in December,1867 in the Council and it was referred to a Select
Committee.
Objections were raised by the mercantile community to the numerous deviations
from the English La which it contained.
The bill had to be redrafted in 1877. After the lapse of a sufficient period for criticism
by the Local Government, the High Courts and the chambers of Commerce, the Bill
was revised by a Select Committee. In spite of this Bill could not reach the final stage.
In 1880 by the Order of the Secretary of the State, the bill had to be referred to a new
Law commission. On the recommendation of the new Law Commission the Bill was
redrafted and again it was sent to a Select Committee.
The draft thus prepared for the fourth time was introduced in the Council and was
passed into law in 1881 being the Negotiable Instrument Act,1881