Pediatric Highlight Schema and Parental Bonding in Overweight and Nonoverweight Female Adolescents
Pediatric Highlight Schema and Parental Bonding in Overweight and Nonoverweight Female Adolescents
& 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0307-0565/05 $30.00
www.nature.com/ijo
PEDIATRIC HIGHLIGHT
Schema and parental bonding in overweight and
nonoverweight female adolescents
HM Turner1*, KS Rose2 and MJ Cooper2
1
School of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK; and 2Isis Education Centre, University of Oxford, Warneford
Hospital, Oxford, UK
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether family functioning and cognitions in a group of overweight female adolescents differ
significantly from those in a group of normal weight female adolescents.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: In all, 23 overweight female adolescents (mean age: 17.6 y, mean body mass index (BMI: 27.8 kg/m2), and 23
normal weight female adolescents (mean age: 17.7 y, mean BMI: 20.2 kg/m2).
MEASUREMENTS: The following self-report measures were completed: the Parental Bonding Inventory,1 the Young Schema
Questionnaire-short version,2 the Eating Attitudes Test,3 the Beck Depression Inventory4 and the Eating Disorder Belief
Questionnaire.5
RESULTS: Overweight female adolescents reported more negative self-beliefs and greater belief in schema relating to emotional
deprivation, fears of abandonment, subjugation and insufficient self-control. They also perceived their fathers as being
significantly more overprotective and significantly less caring. Within this group perceived level of maternal care correlated
negatively with negative self-beliefs and schema.
CONCLUSIONS: Overweight female adolescents show some of the cognitive features associated with the development of an
eating disorder. However, positive parent–child relationships may serve to protect overweight adolescents from developing
clinical eating disorders and from psychological distress later in life.
International Journal of Obesity (2005) 29, 381–387. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802915
Height and weight. Self-reports of height and weight were Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI)
used to calculate BMI. The PBI1 measures perception of parental bonding during
the first 16 y of life. Each of the 25 items is rated on a four-
point Likert scale from ‘very like my parent’ to ‘very unlike
Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) my parent’. The items are grouped into two scales: ‘care’ and
This widely used 40-item Self-Report Questionnaire3 pro- ‘overprotection’, and the measure is completed twice, once
vides a global score of eating disturbance. Each item is rated for each parent. Unhealthy parent–child bonding is indi-
on a six-point Likert scale (1 ¼ never, 6 ¼ always). Garner and cated by lower ‘care’ scores and higher ‘overprotection’
Garfinkel3 suggest that scores Z30 may indicate a clinical scores.1 The PBI has good psychometric properties.29
eating disorder. The EAT has good psychometric properties
including reliability (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ¼ 0.94 for
combined anorexia nervosa and control samples) and Procedure
validity (range of correlations with other eating disorder Local Research Ethics Committees’ approval was obtained in
measures ¼ 0.42–0.81).25 the areas from which the participants were recruited. Letters
and an information sheet outlining the research were sent to
19 schools and a follow-up phone call determined whether
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) or not they were willing to take part. Participating schools
The BDI4 is a 21-item self-report measure giving a global were visited and the study was presented to the 17- to 18-y-
score of depressive symptomatology. Each item is answered old females. The girls were provided with an information
on a four-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating sheet to keep and, where required by local research ethics
more severe symptomatology. The BDI has good psycho- committees, a letter informing their parents of the nature of
metric properties including high concurrent validity and the study. Girls were informed of where and when to return
internal consistency (alpha coefficients ¼ 0.73 and 0.86, should they wish to complete the questionnaires. At the
respectively).26 appointed time girls were each given an unmarked envelope
containing the pack of questionnaires, which they were
asked to return to a box at the front of the room on
Eating Disorder Belief Questionnaire (EDBQ) completion. The researcher was available during and follow-
The EDBQ5 is a 32-item Self-Report Questionnaire that ing each episode of data collection to deal with any concerns
assesses assumptions and beliefs associated with eating or questions. All girls were also provided with an informa-
disorders. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 ¼ ‘I do not tion sheet giving relevant organisations’ addresses and
usually believe this at all’ to 100 ¼ ‘I am usually completely phone numbers, should the girls experience any concerns
convinced that this is true’. The EDBQ has four subscales: regarding eating, weight and shape.
negative self-beliefs, weight and shape as a means to self-
acceptance, weight and shape as a means to acceptance by
others and control over eating. Research with women5
Data analysis
revealed that the EDBQ has good reliability (Cronbach
The data were analysed using SPSS.30 Checks for normality of
coefficient alphas for each factor ranged from 0.86 to 0.94)
distribution was made by the group using the Kolmogrov–
and construct validity (correlations between the four
Smirnov test. Where data failed to meet the criteria for
subscales and other eating disorders measures were signifi-
parametric tests, nonparametric equivalents were applied.
cant at Po0.01).
Index group (n ¼ 23) Control group (n ¼ 23) Index group (n ¼ 23) Control group (n ¼ 23)
Age 17.6 (0.42) 17.7 (0.43) BDI 14.7 (11.6) 10.0 (9.0)
BMI (kg/m2) 27.8 (2.6) 20.2 (0.10) EAT 14.91 (3.0) 14.13 (12.8)
EDBQ subscales
EDBQ-NS 310.87 (246.1) 161.74 (152.0)
EDBQ-SA 328.2 (142.2) 318 (160)
the control group on the negative self-beliefs subscales of the EDBQ-AO 233.48 (250.9) 173.48 (211.3)
EDBQ (t ¼ 2.4, df ¼ 36.6, Po0.018). EDBQ-C 123.04 (146) 135 (138.0)
Significant differences between the two groups were found
PBI subscales
on the following PBI subscales: father care (t ¼ 2.4, df ¼ 31.8,
Maternal care 28.8 (7.0) 30.7 (4.1)
Po0.02) and father overprotection (t ¼ 2.5, df ¼ 34.8, Paternal care 23.39 (8.7) 28.38 (4.1)
Po0.016). Girls in the overweight group perceived their Maternal overprotection 12.91 (7.6) 9.55 (4.3)
fathers to be significantly more overprotecting and signifi- Paternal overprotection 13.52 (8.2) 8.48 (4.5)
cantly less caring than those in the normal weight group.
YSQ subscales
In relation to the YSQ-S, the groups scored significantly Emotional deprivation 11.43 (6.3) 7.43 (2.5)
different on the following subscales: emotional depriva- Abandonment 13.91 (7.3) 8.87 (4.2)
tion (t ¼ 2.7, df ¼ 29, Po0.009), abandonment (t ¼ 2.8, Mistrust/abuse 11.52 (6.1) 9.35 (4.2)
df ¼ 35.2, Po0.007), subjugation (t ¼ 2.1, df ¼ 30.2, Social isolation 11.83 (7.1) 8.83 (4.6)
Defectiveness/shame 11.48 (7.5) 8.2 (3.9)
Po0.037), insufficient self-control/self-discipline (t ¼ 1.9, Failure 12.28 (6.7) 9.78 (4.2)
df ¼ 42, Po0.059) and the YSQ-S total scores (t ¼ 2.4, Dependence/ 10.65 (6.0) 8.39 (3.6)
df ¼ 32, Po0.020). Girls in the index group scored signifi- incompetence
Vulnerability to harm/ 10.13 (5.6) 8.35 (3.6)
cantly higher on these subscales compared with the control
illness
group. Enmeshment 8.91 (4.7) 6.89 (2.0)
Mean scores and standard deviations on questionnaire Subjugation 11.00 (5.5) 8.26 (2.4)
measures are shown in Table 2. Self-sacrifice 15.83 (5.2) 13.0 (5.0)
Emotional inhibition 10.13 (4.7) 10.43 (5.1)
Unrelenting standards 17.35 (6.3) 16.35 (4.7)
Entitlement 11.39 (4.3) 10.39 (3.3)
Insufficient self-control/ 14.70 (5.7) 11.7 (4.7)
self-discipline
Within-group correlations
Total YSQ-S score 182.54 (63.6) 146.2 (31.3)
The results of the within-group correlations are shown in
Table 3. BDI ¼ Beck Depression Inventory; EAT ¼ Eating Attitudes Test; EDBQ-
Within the control group, the ‘mother care’ subscale of the NSB ¼ Eating Disorder Beliefs Questionnaire-Negative Self-Belief; EDBQ-
SA ¼ Eating Disorder Beliefs Questionnaire-self-acceptance; EDBQ-AO ¼ Eating
PBI correlated negatively with the EAT (Po0.01), EDBQ-AO Eating Disorder Beliefs Questionnaire-Acceptance by Others; EDBQ-C ¼ Eating
(Po0.05), EDBQ-C (Po0.01), and the abandonment subscale Disorder Beliefs Questionnaire-Control Overeating; PBI ¼ Parental Bonding
of the YSQ-S (Po0.05). Within the index group, BMI cor- Instrument; YSQ-S ¼ Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form.
related negatively with insufficient self-control (Po0.05).
The ‘mother care’ subscale correlated negatively with the
EDBQ-NSB, (Po0.05) and the following YSQ subscales:
emotional deprivation (Po0.01), mistrust/abuse (Po0.01), Discussion
emotional inhibition (Po0.01), unrelenting standards This study aimed to explore psychological characteristics,
(Po0.01) and entitlement (Po0.05). However, positive including factors related to eating disorders, and perceived
correlations were found between the ‘mother overprotec- parental bonding in a group of overweight female adoles-
tion’ subscale of the PBI and the EDBQ-NSB, EDBQ-SA, cents. The study also aimed to compare these findings with a
EDBA-AO and the BDI (all, Po0.05), as well as with the group of non-overweight female adolescents, and explore
following YSQ-S subscales: emotional deprivation (Po0.01), whether any within-group correlations existed between
abandonment (Po0.05), mistrust/abuse (Po0.01), social these two sets of variables.
isolation (Po0.05), defectiveness/shame (Po0.05), vulner- The findings indicate that there were no significant
ability to harm (Po0.05), subjugation(Po0.01), emotional differences between the two groups in relation to eating
inhibition (Po0.05) and unrelenting standards (Po0.05). disorder symptoms, depressive symptoms and cognitions
There were no significant correlations between ‘father care’ relating to weight and shape as a means of acceptance by self
or ‘father overprotection’ and the psychological variables, or others. However, those in the index group obtained
including schema. higher score on negative self-beliefs, and reported greater
EDBQ subscales
EDBQ-NSB 0.241 0.068 0.486* 0.057 0.453* 0.106
EDBQ-SA 0.169 0.193 0.456* 0.033 0.302 0.392
EDBQ-AO 0.206 0.165 0.437* 0.130 0.296 0.432*
EDBQ-C 0.299 0.078 0.377 0.071 0.145 0.547**
YSQ-S subscales
Emotional deprivation 0.225 0.112 0.608** 0.067 0.640** 0.183
Abandonment 0.282 0.242 0.455* 0.051 0.359 0.535*
Mistrust/abuse 0.102 0.177 0.624** 0.333 0.620** 0.036
Social isolation 0.230 0.215 0.418* 0.398 0.381 0.203
Defectiveness/shame 0.231 0.020 0.486* 0.030 0.350 0.351
Failure 0.324 0.037 0.349 0.248 0.213 0.246
Dependence/incompetence 0.329 0.321 0.340 0.009 0.196 0.012
Vulnerability to harm/illness 0.230 0.022 0.477* 0.321 0.219 0.184
Enmeshment 0.014 0.270 0.156 0.042 0.181 0.134
Subjugation 0.124 0.405 0.549** 0.173 0.276 0.259
Self-sacrifice 0.213 0.226 0.120 0.087 0.154 0.251
Emotional inhibition 0.197 0.040 0.467* 0.207 0.650** 0.126
Unrelenting standards 0.257 0.014 0.460* 0.041 0.604** 0.177
Entitlement 0.204 0.312 0.253 0.227 0.433* 0.038
Insufficient self-control/self-discipline 0.496* 0.192 0.278 0.170 0.381 0.407
n ¼ 23 per group. *Po0.05 level, **Po0.01 level, two-tailed. EAT ¼ Eating Attitudes Test; BDI ¼ Beck Depression Inventory; EDBQ-NSB ¼ Eating Disorder Belief
Questionnaire-Negative Self-Belief; EDBQ-SA ¼ Eating Disorder Belief Questionnaire-Self-Acceptance; EDBQ-AO ¼ Eating Disorder Belief Questionnaire-Acceptance
by Others; EDBQ-C ¼ Eating Disorder Belief Questionnaire-Control Overeating; YSQ-S ¼ Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form; BMI ¼ body mass index;
PBI ¼ parental bonding instrument.
belief in schema relating to emotional deprivation, fears of that eating disorder symptoms are not increased or elevated
abandonment, subjugation and insufficient self-control. The in this group. However, the current findings do indicate that
overweight adolescents also perceived their fathers as being some of the cognitions associated with eating disorders (and
significantly more overprotective and significantly less perhaps with other psychopathology) are present in the
caring than those in the control group. These findings overweight group and not in the normal weight group. This
suggest that while being overweight is not necessarily suggests that some potential risk factors for eating disorders
associated with increased distress and increase in eating are indeed present in an overweight group. One reason for
disorder-related symptoms, it is associated with increased the lack of overt behavioural symptoms and distress in our
presence of some of the cognitions that have been associated sample might be that these have not yet had time to develop,
with eating disorders including negative self-beliefs and and that cognitions act as a precursor. This suggestion would
schema. Perceived poorer family functioning, particularly in be compatible with the development of disorder and distress
relation to fathers, is also associated with being overweight. in cognitive theory.31 It would be useful to conduct some
In the normal weight group, perceived level of maternal longitudinal research to follow-up groups such as these and
care correlated negatively with eating disorder symptoms assess whether the cognitions do develop into overt distress
and abandonment schema on the YSQ-S. In the overweight and eating disorder-related behaviour. The findings concern-
group, a positive relationship was found between maternal ing perceived parent–child relationship add further to the
overprotection, and the presence of cognitions associated literature concerned with parental relationships in over-
with eating disorders (on both EDBQ and YSQ-S subscales). weight adolescents. Previous research findings9,10 have
The level of maternal care appeared to correlate negatively suggested that a positive parent–child relationship may
with the level of negative self-beliefs, as well as with YSQ-S serve to reduce psychosocial risk in overweight adolescents.
subscales relating to schemas such as unrelenting standards The present study supports this and suggests that in the
and emotional deprivation. overweight group cognitions may also be associated with
The findings are consistent with those who have failed to perceived parental care and protection. In addition, the
find increased distress in overweight adolescents7 and negative relationship found between perceived maternal
contrary to findings in overweight children,20 suggesting care, and eating attitudes and fears of abandonment, in the