Problems: Ted Eisenberg, Section Editor
Problems: Ted Eisenberg, Section Editor
*********************************************************
This section of the Journal offers readers an opportunity to exchange interesting mathematical
problems and solutions. Please send them to Ted Eisenberg, Department of Mathematics, Ben-
Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel or fax to: 972-86-477-648. Questions concerning proposals
and/or solutions can be sent e-mail to <eisenbt@013.net>. Solutions to previously stated problems
can be seen at <http://www.ssma.org/publications>.
————————————————————–
• 5615: Proposed by Pedro Henrique Oliveira Pantoja, University of Campina Grande, Brazil
Solve in < × < the system:
√
3
√ √
2x + 2 + 3 4 − x + 3 2 − x = 2
p
5
p
5
p
20 − 2y + 7 − y + 5 3y + 5 = 2
• 5616: Proposed by D.M. Bătinetu-Giurgiu “Matei Basarb” National College, Bucharest and
Neculai Stanciu, “George Emil Palade” Secondary School Buzău, Romania
Prove that in all tetrahedrons [ABCD] the following inequality holds:
s s s s
1 3 hb hc 1 3 hc hd 1 3 hd ha 1 3 ha hb 1
2
+ 2 + 2
+ 2 ≥ ,
ha ha hb hb hc hc hd hd r
1
where r is the radius of the insphere of the tetrahedron.
• 5618: Proposed by Ovidiu Furdui and Alina Sîntămărian, Technical University of Cluj-
Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Let k > 0 be a real number. Calculate
2 1 1 1
lim n + + + ··· .
n→∞ n3 (n + k)3 (n + 2k)3
Solutions
2
p
29336 42(148035889 − s2 ) + 205343s
We still have t = , but here we have 8928 ≤ 12167.
279841
A computer search finds no integral solutions for t.
3
• 5596: Proposed by Albert Natian, Los Angeles Valley College, Valley Glen, CA
z
a
b
x y
A
c
B
Let V be a vertex of a rectangular box. Let V A, V B√ and V C be the three edges meeting at
vertex V . Suppose the area of the triangle ABC is 6 26. The volume of the box is 144. And
the sum of the edges of the box is 76. Find the total surface area of the box.
16·36·26 = 2(x2 +y 2 )(y 2 +z 2 )+2(y 2 +z 2 )(z 2 +x2 )+2(z 2 +x2 )(x2 +y 2 )−(x2 +y 2 )2 −(y 2 +z 2 )2 −(z 2 +x2 )2
4(x2 y 2 + y 2 z 2 + z 2 x2 ) = 16 · 36 · 26
x2 y 2 + y 2 z 2 + z 2 x2 = 144 · 26
(xy + yz + zx)2 − 2xyz(x + y + z) = 144 · 26
(xy + yz + zx)2 = 2 · 144 · 19 + 144 · 26,
hence xy + yz + zx = 96 and the total surface area of the box is 2 · 96 = 192.
4
Since
= 4 x2 + z 2 x2 + y 2 − 4x4 = x2 y 2 + y 2 z 2 + x2 z 2 ,
This implies that (x, y, z) = (3, 4, 12) and hence the total surface area of the box is 2(xy +
yz + zx) = 192.
5
(a + b + c)(a + b − c)(a − b + c)(−a + b + c) = 14976.
Since a = y + z , b2 = x2 + z 2 , and c2 = x2 + y 2 , this yields d1 d2 d3 d4 = 14976, where
2 2 2
p p p
d1 = a + b + c = py 2 + (19 − x − y)2 + px2 + (19 − x − y)2 + px2 + y 2 ;
d2 = a + b − c = py 2 + (19 − x − y)2 + px2 + (19 − x − y)2 − px2 + y 2 ;
d3 = a − b + c = py 2 + (19 − x − y)2 − p x2 + (19 − x − y)2 + p x2 + y 2 ;
d4 = −a + b + c = − y + (19 − x − y) + x + (19 − x − y) + x2 + y 2 .
2 2 2 2
The intersection of these graphs in the first quadrant (see below) consists of six points, corre-
sponding to {x, y, z} = {3, 4, 12}. Hence the total surface area of the box is 2(xy + yz + zx) =
192.
Addenda. (1) The diagram below shows the graphs in the first quadrant of the equations
x2 y − 19xy + xy 2 + 144 = 0 (in red) and d1 d2 d3 d4 = 14976 (in blue).
√ √
(2) We note that {a, b, c} = {5, 3 17, 4 10}.
Editor0 s comment: Shortly after receiving the above solution Brian sent a note expanding on
the above question. His note;
Motivated by how the graphs of the two equations barely intersect in the first quadrant (in
our solution for the original problem), we pose the following questions:
√
1. Given a triangle area of 6 26 and a box edge sum of 76, what is the maximum possible
6
box volume?
2. Given a box volume of 144 and a box edge sum of 76, what is the minimum possible triangle
area?
√
3. Given a box volume of 144 and a triangle area of 6 26, what is the maximum possible box
edge sum?
Solution. In each case, due to symmetry, we assume x = y in order to produce three points
(instead of six) where the two graphs intersect.
In summary, we salute the proposer of the original problem for finding constraints that not
only produce integer solutions for the box dimensions but also cannot be tweaked too much
more without losing any chance of a solution.
Also solved by Michel Bataille, Rouen, France; Kee-Wai Lau, Hong Kong, China;
Annabel Ma, (student), New Trier High School, Winnetka, Il; Ioannis D. Sfikas
National Technical University of Athens, Greece; Daniel Văcaru, Pitesti Romania;
David Stone and John Hawkins, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA,
and the proposer.
• 5597: Proposed by Daniel Sitaru, National Economic College “Theodor Costescu,” Mehedinti,
Romania
If x, y, z > 0; xyz = 1 then:
1 2 1 2 1 2
x+y− √ + y+z− √ + z+x− √ ≥3
z x y
7
Solutions 1, 2, and 3 by Henry Ricardo, Westchester Area Math Circle, NY
p √
Solution 1: First we note that Maclaurin’s inequality gives us (xy + yz + zx)/3 ≥ 3 xyz =
1, or xy + yz + zx ≥ 3. Then the AGM inequality yields
X 1 2
X √
x+y− √ = (x + y − xy)2
z
cyclic cyclic
X √
≥ ( xy)2 = xy + yz + zx ≥ 3.
cyclic
√ √ √ √ √ √
( x − y)2 + ( y − z)2 + ( z − x)2
= (x + y + z) +
2
≥ x+y+z
√
≥ 3 3 xyz
= 3.
8
Hence by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have
1 2 1 2 1 2
x+y− √ + y+z− √ + z+x− √
z x y
2
1 1 1 1
≥ x+y− √ + y+z− √ + z+x− √
3 z x y
1 √ √ √ 2
= (x + y − xy) + (y + z − yz) + z + x − zx
3
1 √ √ √ 2
= 2 (x + y + z) − xy + yz + zx
3
≥ 3, as required.
Comments from the solution of David Stone and John Hawkins of Georgia South-
ern University, Statesboro, GA: Like others they commented that A(x) is the Lagrange
i
Interpolating Polynomial passing through n + 1 given points i, 3 , i = 0. . . . n. They then
went on to say that “the value 3 in the problem is not necessary. That is if a > 1 is any real
number a we require that A(x) be a polynomial of degree n such that A(i) = ai for 0 ≤ i ≤ n,
the exact same proof shows that A(n + 1) = an+1 − (a − 1)n+1 .”
They continued: “This example demonstrates the problem with using the polynomial A(x)
to approximate the exponential function 3x . Even when A(x) passes through the n + 1 ‘nice’
points, i, 3i , i = 0, 1, . . . n, it misses the ‘next’ value, 3n+1 , by a long way. Of course, it is
9
of degree (at most) n such that A (i) = ai , for 0 ≤ i ≤ n. Then
n
X
A (n + 1) = ak Ln,k (n + 1)
k=0
Hence,
n
X n+1−k n+1 k
A (n + 1) = − (−1) a = an+1 − (a − 1)n+1 .
k
k=0
n
n
X n+1
i i
= (−1) (−1) 3 = (−1)n (1 − 3)n+1 + 3n+1 = 3n+1 − 2n+1 .
i
i=0
n
X n+1 k
and therefore A(n + 1) = 2 = 3n+1 − 2n+1 .
k
k=0
10
Thus,
n k−1
X 2k Y
A(n + 1) = 1 + (n + 1 − j)
k!
k=1 j=0
n
k n+1
X
= 1+ 2
k
k=1
n+1
X n + 1
= 2k − 2n+1
k
k=0
n+1
= 3 − 2n+1 .
n
Y
where the hat indicates the omitted factor and P (x) = (x − i).
i=0
P (n + 1) (n + 1)!(n − i)!
Since = , we obtain
n+1−i (n + 1 − i)!
n
X 1 (n + 1)!(n − i)!
A(n + 1) = 3i · ·
i!(−1)n−i (n − i)! (n + 1 − i)!
i=0
n
X (n + 1)!
= (−1)n−i 3i ·
i!(n + 1 − i)!
i=0
n
n
X n+1
= (−1) (−3)i
i
i=0
n+1
!
X n + 1
= (−1)n (−3)i − (−3)n+1
i
i=0
= (−1) (1 − 3)n+1 − (−1)n+1 3n+1
n
Solution 6 by Dionne Bailey, Elsie Campbell, and Charles Diminnie, Angelo State
University, San Angelo, TX
Our solution makes use of the Binomial Theorem: For m ≥ 1 and a, b > 0,
m m m m m−1 m m−1 m m
(a + b) = a + a b + ... + ab + b ,
0 1 m−1 m
11
m m!
where = for k = 0, . . . , m.
k k! (m − k)!
We begin by introducing the new function
n
X 2k
f (x) = 1 + x (x − 1) · · · (x − k + 1)
k!
k=1
for n ≥ 1. Note first of all that f (x) is a polynomial of degree n and f (0) = 1 = 30 . Next,
when 0 < i < n, we have
i (i − 1) · · · (i − k + 1) = 0
for k ≥ i + 1. Hence,
n
X 2k
f (i) = 1 + i (i − 1) · · · (i − k + 1)
k!
k=1
i
X 2k
=1+ i (i − 1) · · · (i − k + 1)
k!
k=1
2 22 2i
=1+ i + i (i − 1) + . . . + i (i − 1) · · · (1)
1! 2!
i!
i i 2 i i
=1+ 2+ 2 + ... + 2
1 2 i
i i i i−1 i i−2 2 i i
= 1 + 1 2+ 1 2 + ... + 2
0 1 2 i
= (1 + 2)i
= 3i .
Finally,
2 22 2n
f (n) = 1 + n + n (n − 1) + . . . + n (n − 1) · · · (1)
1! 2! n!
n n n n−1 n n−2 2 n n
= 1 + 1 2+ 1 2 + ... + 2
0 1 2 n
= (1 + 2)n
= 3n .
12
n ≥ 1,
A (n + 1) = f (n + 1)
n
X 2k
=1+ (n + 1) (n) · · · (n + 2 − k)
k!
k=1
21 22 2n
=1+ (n + 1) + (n + 1) (n) + . . . + (n + 1) (n) · · · (2)
1! 2!
n!
n+1 1 n+1 2 n+1 n
=1+ 2 + 2 + ... + 2
1 2 n
n+1 1 n+1 2 n+1 n n + 1 n+1
=1+ 2 + 2 + ... + 2 + 2
1 2 n n+1
n + 1 n+1
− 2
n+1
n + 1 n+1 n+1 n 1 n + 1 n−1 2 n+1 1 n
= 1 + 1 2 + 1 2 + ... + 1 2
0 1 2 n
n + 1 n+1
+ 2 − 2n+1
n+1
= (1 + 2)n+1 − 2n+1
= 3n+1 − 2n+1 . (1)
To complete our claim, we note that when n = 0, A (x) is a polynomial of degree 0 (i.e., A (x)
is a constant polynomial) with A (0) = 30 = 1. It follows that A (x) = 1 for all real x and we
have
A (0 + 1) = A (1) = 1 = 3 − 2 = 30+1 − 20+1 .
This also demonstrates that (1) is true when n = 0.
Since:
n+1 n
X n + 1 n+1−i X n + 1 n−i
(−1)i−1 3 = (−1)i 3
i i+1
i=1 i=0
n−1
X i n n
= (−1) + 3n−i + (−1)n
i+1 i
i=0
n−1 n−1
X i n n−i
X i n
= (−1) 3 + (i − 1) 3n−i + (−1)n−1
i+1 i
i=0 i=0
13
n−1 n
X i−1 n n−i+1 X i−1 n
= (−1) 3 − (−1) 3n−i + (−1)n + (−1)n−1
i i
i=1 i=0
n n
X i−1 n n−i+1 X i−1 n
= (−1) 3 − (−1) 3n−i
i i
i=1 i=0
= 3n+1 − 3 · 2n − 2n
= 3n+1 − 2n+1 .
[1] Alt, Arkady M. (2019). Numerical sequences and polynomials. Arhimede Mathematical
Journal, 6(2) : 114−120. http : //amj−math.com/wp−content/uploads/2020/02/AM J2019−
vol6iss2.pdf
[2] http://math.stackexchnge.com/questions/2161052/showing−3n− sum−k−0n−1k−binomnk4n-
k
Solution 9 by Albert Natian, Los Angeles Valley College, Valley Glen, California
Answer. A(n + 1) = 3n+1 − 2n+1 .
Justification. We begin with the following lemma whose proof is provided toward the end of
this solution.
Lemma.
n
X n+i n+1 k
(−1) i = (n + 1)k for k = 0, 1, 2, · · · , n.
i
i=0
14
We have
n n n
X X X n+1 k
A (n + 1) = ak (n + 1)k = ak (−1)n+i i
i
k=0 k=0 i=0
n X n n
n+i n + 1 n+i n + 1
X X
k
= (−1) ak i = (−1) A (i)
i i
i=0 k=0 i=0
n n
n+i n + 1 n+1
X n
X
= (−1) i
b = (−1) (−b)i
i i
i=0 i=0
n+1
" #
n n+1
X n+1 i
= (−1) − (−b) + (−b)
i
i=0
h i
= (−1) (−1) b + (1 − b)n+1
n n n
= bn+1 − (b − 1)n+1 .
Then
A (n + 1) = mn+1 .
Lemma.
n
X n+i n+1 k
(−1) i = (n + 1)k for k = 0, 1, 2, · · · , n.
i
i=0
Proof. Clearly the above result holds for k = 0 and all n. The remainder of the proof is by
induction on n with k ≥ 1. For n = 0, 1, 2, the above statement (clearly) holds. Suppose the
15
statement of the lemma above holds for n. Then
n+1 n+1
X n+1+i n+1+1 k X n+1+i n + 1 + 1 k
(−1) i = (−1) i
i i
i=0 i=1
n+1
X n+1 n+1
= (−1)n+1+i + ik
i i−1
i=1
"n+1 # "n+1 #
X n + 1 X n + 1
= (−1)n+1+i ik + (−1)n+1+i ik
i i−1
i=1 i=1
n
" #
n+i n + 1 k
k
X
= (n + 1) − (−1) i +
i
i=1
"n+1 #
n+1+i n + 1 k
X
+ (−1) i
i−1
i=1
n
h i X n+1
= (n + 1)k − (n + 1)k + (−1)n+j (j + 1)k
j
j=0
n k
X n+1 X k p
= (−1)n+j j
j p
j=0 p=0
k X
n
X k n+j n + 1
= (−1) jp
p j
p=0 j=0
k
X k
= (n + 1)p = (n + 1 + 1)k .
p
p=0
Also solved by Bruno Salgueiro Fanego (two solutions), Viveiro, Spain; Kee-Wai Lau,
Hong Kong, China; Moti Levy, Rehovot, Israel, and the proposer.
• 5599: Proposed by Ovidiu Furdui and Alina Sîntămărian, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca,
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
16
π
if in the first of these integrals we enforce a substitution of x 7→ − x one finds
2
Z π
2 cos x
In = 2 2n−1 dx.
0 sin x + cos2n−1 x
Rearranging the integrand we have
Z π
2 cos x
In = 2 dx
0 cos2n−1 x(1 + tan2n−1 x)
π
sec2n−2 x
Z
2
=2 dx
0 1 + tan2n−1 x
π
sec2n−4 x sec2 x
Z
2
=2 dx.
0 1 + tan2n−1 x
Letting u = tan x, as sec2n−4 x = (1 + u2 )n−2 one has
Z ∞
(1 + u2 )n−2
In = 2 du.
0 1 + u2n−1
From the binomial theorem, since
n−2
X
2 n−2 n − 2 2k
(1 + u ) = u ,
k
k=0
Identification of the integral that remains as a beta function is now made. Setting t = u2n−1 in the
integral we find
n−2 Z ∞ 2k+2−2n
2 X n−2 t 2n−1
In = dt
2n − 1 k 0 1+t
k=0
2k+1
t( 2n−1 )−1
n−2 Z ∞
2 X n−2
= 2k+1 2n−2k−2 dt
2n − 1 k 0 (1 + t)( 2n−1 )+( 2n−1 )
k=0
n−2
2 X n−2 2k + 1 2n − 2k − 2
= B , (0)
2n − 1 k 2n − 1 2n − 1
k=0
n−2
2 X n−2 2k + 1 2n − 2k − 2
= Γ Γ
2n − 1 k 2n − 1 2n − 1
k=0
n−2
2 X n−2 2k + 1 2k + 1
= Γ Γ 1− (1)
2n − 1 k 2n − 1 2n − 1
k=0
n−2
2π X n − 2 2k + 1
= cosec π. (2)
2n − 1 k 2n − 1
k=0
17
∞
tx−1
Z
(1) Identification of the integral as a beta function, namely B(x, y) = dt, for
0 (1 + t)x+y
x, y > 0.
(2) Relationship between the beta function and gamma function of B(x, y) = Γ(x)Γ(y)/Γ(x+
y) has been used.
(3) Euler’s reflexion formula for the gamma function Γ(x)Γ(1 − x) = π/ sin(πx) has been
used.
So in conclusion the value for the integral is given by
n−2
2π X n − 2 2k + 1
In = cosec π, n = 2, 3, 4, . . . .
2n − 1 k 2n − 1
k=0
Z π Z π
2 sin x + cos x 4 sin x + cos x
dx = 2 dx =
0 sin2n−1 x 0 sin 2n−1
x + cos2n−1 x
π
1
(1 + y 2 )n−2 (1 + y)
Z Z
4 1 + tan x
= 2 dx = 2 dy.
0 cos 2n−2 x(1 + tan2n−1 x) 0 1 + y 2n−1
Furthermore,
πi(2k+1)
e−
Z 1 1
2n−1 −πi(2k+1) πi(2k+1)
− 2n−1
−πi(2k+1)
dy = − log 1 − ye 2n−1
= − log 1 − e
=
0 1 − ye 2n−1 0
π(2k + 1) πi(2k + 1) πi
= − log 2 sin + − .
4n − 2 4n − 2 2
We conclude Z π
2 sin x + cos x
2n−1 dx =
0 sin x + cos2n−1 x
18
2n−2
2n i X
k n−2 π(2k + 1) π(2k + 1) π(2k + 1 πi(2k + 1) πi
(−1) cos cos − log 2 sin + − =
2n − 1 2n − 1 2n − 1 4−2 4n − 2 2
k=0
2n−2
2n X
π(2k + 1) π(2k + 1) π π(2k + 1)
= (−1)k cosn−2 cos − =
2n − 1 2n − 1 2(2n − 1) 2 4π − 2
k=0
2n−2
2n+1 π X
k n−2 π(2k + 1) π(2k + 1) n−1−k
= (−1) cos cos .
2n − 1 2n − 1 2(2n − 1) 2n − 1
k=0
Z π Z π
sin x + cos x
2 2 sin x
In := 2n−1 2n−1
dx = 2 2n−1 dx. (1)
0 sin x + cos x 0 sin x + cos2n−1 x
After changing the variable w = tan2 x, we get
(1 + w)n−2
Z ∞
In = 1 dw. (2)
0 1 + wn− 2
The following definite integral from Gradshteyn I , Ryzhik I Table Of Integrals, Series And Products
(7Ed , Elsevier, 2007), entry 3.241 is used:
Z ∞ µ−1
t 1 µ µ
dw = B , 1 − , (3)
0 1 + tν ν ν ν
Z 1
where B (x, y) := tx−1 (1 − t)y−1 dt is the Beta function.
0
Proof of (3):
By definition of the Beta function
µ 1 1 µ −1
Z
1 µ µ
B ,1 − = u ν (1 − u)− ν du
ν ν ν ν 0
tν du νtν−1
After changing the variable u = , =
1 + tν dt (tν + 1)2
Z ν µν −1
1
1 ∞ µ νtν−1
Z
1 µ µ t 1
u ν −1 (1 − u)− ν du = − dt
ν 0 ν 0 1+t ν 1+tν ν (tν + 1)2
Z ∞ µ−1
t
= dx.
0 1 + tν
Expanding (1 + w)n−2 gives,
∞ n−2
wm
n−2
Z X
In = 1 dw
0 m=0 m 1 + wn− 2
n−2
X n − 2 Z ∞ wm
= 1 dw
m 0 1 + wn− 2
m=0
n−2
!
X n−2
m m+1 m+1
= 1B 1 ,1 − 1 .
m=0
n − 2 n − 2 n − 2
19
Applying the reflection rule
π
B (x, 1 − x) = ,
sin (πx)
we conclude that
n−2 n−2
2π X m
In = .
2n − 1 sin 2m+2
π
m=0 2n−1
+∞ n−2 n−2
X n − 2 Z +∞
X n − 2 t2k
Z
1 2k
= 2 2n−1 t dt = 2 dt
0 1 + tt k k 0 1 + t2n−1
k=0 i=0
Since:
+∞
ta
Z
π
J(a, b) = dt = i , with
1 + tb
h
0 b sin (a+1)π
b
1
a,b ∈ < and b > a + 1 > 0. With the substitution = z, we have:
1 + tb
Z 1
1 a+1 a+1
−1 1 a+1 a+1 1 a+1 a+1
J(a, b) = z b (1 − z) b dz = B ,1 − = Γ Γ 1−
b 0 b b b b b b
π
= h i.
(a+1)π
b sin b
So,we have
n−2 n−2
2π X k
In = .
2n − 1 (2k + 1)π
k=0 sin
2n − 1
Also solved by Michel Bataille, Ruen, France; Kee-Wai Lau, Hong Kong, China; and
the proposer.
20
Evaluate: Z π
log 1 + 2a cos x + a2 log 1 + 2b cos x + b2 dx,
0
if a, b ∈ < are such that the product ab with |a|, |b| < 1 satisfies the equation a2 b2 + ab = 1.
Z π
log 1 + 2a cos x + a2 log 1 + 2b cos x + b2 dx = 2πLi2 (a, b),
(*)
0
Proof of (∗) :
Z π
log(1 + 2a cos x + a2 ) log(1 + 2b cos x + b2 )dx =
0
Z 2π
1
= log(1 + 2a cos x + a2 ) log(1 + 2b cos x + b2 )dx =
2 0
Z 2π
1
log 1 + 2a(eix + e−ix ) + a2 log 1 + b(eix + e−ix ) + b2 dx =
=
2 0
Z 2π
1
log (1 + aeix )(1 + ae−ix ) log (1 + beix )(1 + be−ix ) dx =
=
2 0
Z 2π Z 2π
1 1
+ log(1 + aeix ) log(1 + beix )dx + log(1 + aeix ) log(1 + be−ix )dx+
2 0 2 0
1 2π 2π
Z Z
1
+ log(1 + ae−ix ) log(1 + beix )dx + log(1 + ae−ix ) log(1 + be−ix )dx+
2 0 2 0
∞ ∞
! !
2π
(−1)k+1 (−1)k+1
Z
1 X
k ikx
X
k ikx
= a e b e dx+
2 0 k k
k=1 k=1
∞ ∞
! !
2π
(−1)k+1 k ikx (−1)k+1 k −ikx
Z
1 X X
+ a e b e dx+
2 0 k k
k=1 k=1
21
∞ ∞
! !
2π
(−1)k+1 (−1)k+1
Z
1 X X
+ ak e−ikx bk eikx dx+
2 0 k k
k=1 k=1
∞ ∞
! !
2π
(−1)k+1 (−1)k+1
Z
1 X
k −ikx
X
k −ikx
+ a e b e dx =
2 0 k k
k=1 k=1
∞ ∞
X ak bk X ak bk
=0+π +π + 0 = 2πLi2 (ab).
k2 k2
k=1 k=1
interchange of summation and integration is permitted, since all series converge absolutely and
uniformity for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2π.
We observe that
Z π Z a Z b Z aZ b
2(t + cos x) 2(u + cos x)
I= dt · du dx = 4 F (t, u) dt du
0 0 1 + 2t cos x + t2 0 1 + 2u cos x + u
2
0 0
where Z π
(t + cos x)(u + cos x)
F (t, u) = dx.
0 (1 + 2t cos x + t2 )(1 + 2u cos x + u2 )
To calculate F (t, u), we make use of the change of variables defined by y = tan(x/2), that is,
2dy 1 − y2
x = arctan(2y), dx = , cos x = . We obtain:
1 + y2 1 + y2
Z ∞
[y 2 (1 − t) − (1 + t)][y 2 (1 − u) − (1 + u)] dy 2
F (t, u) = 2 ·
2 (1 − t)2 + (1 + t)2 ][y 2 (1 − u)2 + (1 + u)2 ] y 2 + 1
= J(r, s)
0 [y (1 − t)(1 − u)
1+t 1+u
where r = > 0, s = > 0 (since |t| ≤ |a| < 1, |u| ≤ |b| < 1) and
1−t 1−u
Z ∞
(y 2 − r)(y 2 − s)
J(r, s) = dy.
0 (y 2 + r2 )(y 2 + s2 )(y 2 + 1)
π
Since J(r, s) = (see a quick proof at the end), we have
2(r + s)
2 π π
F (t, u) = · = .
(1 − t)(1 − u) 2 1+t + 1+u 2(1 − tu)
1−t 1−u
√
5−1
Noticing that from the hypotheses on ab, we must have ab = , we obtain
2
b a Z b Z ab
log(|1 − au|) log |1 − w|
Z Z
dt
I = 2π du = 2π − = −2π dw
0 0 1 − tu 0 u 0 w
22
hence
ab
log(1 − w)
Z
I = 2π − dw = 2πLi2 (ab)
0 w
x X xn ∞
ln(1 − w)
Z
where Li2 (x) = − dw = denotes the dilogarithm function. The claimed result
0 w n2
n=1
now follows from √ ! √ !
5−1 π2 5−1
Li2 = − log2
2 10 2
(see for example: D. Zagier, The Remarkable Dilogarithm, J. Math. and Phys. Sciences, 22(1988),
131-145).
π
Proof of J(r, s) = .
2(r + s)
If r 6= s, we have
Z ∞ ∞
dy 1 π
and the result readily follows from 2 2
= arctan(y/m) = for positive m.
0 y +m m 0 2m
If r = s, r 6= 1, the result similarly follows from the decomposition
(y 2 − r)2 r2 (r2 − 1) r2 − 2r
1 1
= − + 2
(y 2 + 1)((y 2 + r2 )2 (r − 1)2 y 2 + 1 (y 2 + r2 )2 y + r2
∞
1 ∞ 1 π/2
Z Z Z
dy dx π
and 2 2 2
= 3 2 2
= 3 cos2 u du = 3 .
0 (y + r ) r 0 (x + 1) r 0 4r
If r = s = 1, the decomposition
(y 2 − 1)2 4 4 1
2 3
= 2 3
− 2 2
+ 2
(y + 1) (y + 1) (y + 1) y +1
Z ∞ Z π/2
dy 3π
and = cos4 u du = readily show that the result is still valid.
0 (y + 1)3
2
0 16
Since
∞ X
∞ ∞ ∞
! !
X (−1)m+n am bn cos(mx) cos(nx) X |a|m X |b|n
≤
mn m n
m=1 n=1 m=1 n=1
23
= log(1 − |a|) log(1 − |b|) < ∞,
∞ X
∞ π
(−1)m+n am bn
X Z
= 4 cos(mx) cos(nx)dx.
mn 0
m=1 n=1
References:
1. G.E. Andrews, R. Askey, R. Roy: Special Functions, Cambridge University Press, 1999
2. Paul J. Nahin: Inside Interesting Integrals, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2015.
24
x
The following definite integrals can be evaluated by substitution t = tan ,
2
Z π Z ∞
2
F (x, a) dx = dt
0 0 (a − 1) t + (a + 1)2
2 2
∞
2 1−a 1
= arctan t = π. (2)
1 − a2 1+a 0 1 − a2
Z π Z ∞
1 1 2
F (x, a) F (x, b) dx = 1−t2 2 dt
0 0 1+ a2 + 2a 1+t2 1+ b2 + 2b 1−t 1 + t2
1+t2
∞
t2 + 1
Z
2 dt
0 (a − 1)2 t2 + (a + 1)2 (b − 1)2 t2 + (b + 1)2
∞
1−a
−2a 1 − b2 arctan 1+a t + 2b 1 − a2 arctan 1−b
1+b t
= 2 2 2 2
(1 − a ) (1 − b ) (b − a + a b − ab )
0
(1 + ab)
= π. (3)
(1 − a ) (1 − b2 ) (1 − ab)
2
∂2J 2π
= .
∂a∂b 1 − ab
Since
∂J
= f or b = 0,
∂a
J = 0 f or a = 0,
then Z bZ a
2π
J (a, b) = dudv = 2πLi2 (ab) ,
0 0 1 − uv
where Li2 (x) is the Dilogarithm function defined by
∞
X xk
Li2 (x) := , |x| < 1.
k2
k=1
√
2 2 1 5+1
The condition a b + ab = 1 implies that ab = , where φ is the golden ratio φ = .
φ 2
1
The value of the Dilogarithm at has been calculated using the properties of the Dilogarithm (see
φ
the entry Spence’s function in Wikipedia),
π2
1 3
Li2 = ζ (2) − ln2 φ = − ln2 φ.
φ 5 10
We conclude that the integral is equal to
π3
− 2π ln2 φ ∼
= 4.74629
5
25
Solution 5 by Ioannis D. Sfikas, National Technical University of Athens, Greece
The definite integral is the limit of the Riemann sum: The definite integral of a continuos function
Z b
f over the interval [a, b], denote by f (x)dx is the limit of a Riemann sum as the number of
a
subdivisions approaches infinity. That is:
Z b n
X
f (x)dx = lim ∆x · f (xi ),
a n→∞
i=1
b−a
where ∆x = and xi = a + ∆x · i. Let:
n
Z π Z π
F (a) = log(1 + 2a cos x + a2 )dx, F (b) = log(1 + 2b cos x + b2 )dx,
0 0
Z π
F (a, b) = log(1 + 2a cos x + a2 ) log(1 + 2b cos x + b2 )dx.
0
First, we have
1 + 2a cos x + a2 = (a + cos x)2 + sin2 x = a + eix ,
Hence:
n
πX k 2
1
F (a) = lim log a + ei n = π lim log |an + 1|2 = 0.
n→∞ n n→+∞ n
k=1
n
πX k 2
1
F (b) = lim in
log b + e = π lim log |bn + 1|2 = 0
n→∞ n n→+∞ n
k=1
for a, b ∈ < are such that the product ab with |a|, |b| < 1, satisfies the equation a2 b2 + ab = 1.
Using the identities:
X cos(nx)
log(1 − 2a cos x + a2 ) = −2 an ,
n
n≥1
Z π
π
with x, a ∈ <, |a| < 1, and cos mx cos(nx)dx = δm,n where δ is the Kroneocker delta, we have:
0 2
n
πX k 2
in
k 2
in
F (a, b) = lim log a + e log b + e
n→+∞ n
k=1
Z n X cos(nx) X cos(mx)
=4 (−a)n (−b)m dx
0 n m
n≥1 m≥1
X (−a)n (−b)m Z π
= 4 cos(nx) cos(mx)dx
nm 0
m,n≥1
X (ab)n
= 2π = 2πLi2 (ab).
n2
n≥1
26
where Li2 x is the dilogarithm. Also, we have:
√
5−1
ab = = φ ≈ 0.61803,
2
where φ is the conjugate of the golden ratio. So, we have:
2
π2
−1 1
Li2 (ab) = Li2 (φ) = − sinh ≈ 0.75539561953
10 2
M ea Culpa
The name of Ioannis D. Sfikas of the National Technical University of Athens, Greece
was inadvertently not listed as having solved problems 5589, 5590, and 5591.
The name of Albert Stadler of Herrliberg, Switzerland was also inadvertently omitted from
the list of those who solved 5590.
27