Investments Incentives Viet Nam
Investments Incentives Viet Nam
net/publication/341708350
CITATIONS READS
0 194
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Analysis of the Ecosystem Services of Mangrove to Aquaculture and Fisheries in Vietnam View project
Measurement of Career Success: The Case of Rural to Urban Migrant Labourers in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Quan Minh Quoc Binh on 28 May 2020.
December 2012
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) contributes to sustainable development by advancing
policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change and energy, and
management of natural and social capital, as well as the enabling role of communication technologies in these areas.
We report on international negotiations and disseminate knowledge gained through collaborative projects, resulting
in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries, better networks spanning the North and the
South, and better global connections among researchers, practitioners, citizens and policy-makers.
IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live
sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD
receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the International Development
Research Centre (IDRC), from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and from the Province of Manitoba. The
Institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies,
foundations and the private sector.
Head Office
161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3B 0Y4
Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 | Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 | Web site: www.iisd.org
About TKN
The Trade Knowledge Network (TKN) is a global collaboration of research institutions across Africa, Asia, Europe and
the Americas working on issues of trade, investment and sustainable development. Coordinated by the International
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), the TKN links network members, strengthens capacity in areas of
research, training and policy analysis, and also generates new research to assess and address the impact of trade and
investment policies on sustainable development.
The TKN brings together institutions and individuals working on common concerns, strengthening each others’
research and communication capacity and knowledge bases, and developing solutions to share with others outside
the network. It thereby provides a platform for partner-based research and specific policy engagement.
Investment Incentives for Renewable Energy in Southeast Asia: Case study of Viet Nam
December 2012
Nam, Pham Khanh; Quan, Nguyen Anh; & Binh, Quan Minh Quoc
All of these pressures have greatly raised the profile of renewable energy technologies (RETs), with governments now
commonly providing a range of support frameworks and incentives to attract investment.
In developing countries, government support for renewable energy is complicated by the need to simultaneously
expand access to energy more generally, as a cornerstone of poverty eradication and improvement of living standards.
Frameworks and incentives must attract finance and maximize benefits from natural resources, while expanding
energy access and keeping energy affordable for consumers and industry.
In order to achieve this difficult balancing act, policy-makers must know what kinds of incentives are most effective
at attracting investment for renewable energy projects, and what size of support is affordable and reasonable.
This report assesses investment incentives for renewable energy in Viet Nam. It focuses on small hydro, wind, solar,
biogas, and biomass resources. Through an analysis of the incentives available for these technologies, and drawing
on insights from representatives from governments and industry, it suggests some initial findings on the extent to
which Viet Nam’s investment incentives for renewable energy are effective and affordable, and identifies further
research that could usefully be conducted in this area.
The analysis is part of a series of reports that aim to conduct an initial, exploratory assessment of such incentives in
developing countries around the world.
This study follows the broader definition of “investment incentives,” recognizing that the vast majority of renewable
energy subsidies cannot just focus on attracting investment to a particular location, but must also provide the financial
support that makes such investments viable in the first instance. In this sense, the words “investment incentive” and
“subsidy” can be considered interchangeable throughout the report, to the extent that the subsidy in question can be
argued to affect investment decisions.
It should be noted, however, that “investment incentives” and “subsidies” do not include measures that are intended
to remove existing market distortions that are a barrier to renewable energy. For example, none of the following
measures would be considered to qualify as investment incentives: the removal of fossil energy subsidies; regulation
intended to remove barriers to renewable energy entering the energy market; or the use of taxation and payments
to internalize positive and negative externalities. While such measures are not the focus of this report, they are
identified and factored into assessments where relevant.
The evaluation of the impacts from investment incentives is based on two specific goals:
• C
hoice of location of the renewable energy project. This goal is understood as the effect of the incentive on
the firm’s decision to choose a location and invest in a renewable energy project. The key objective of the
incentive is to increase the likelihood of choosing a targeted location.
• C
ontinuation of the existing investment. Besides possible impacts on the choice of investment location,
a subsidy could help to retain and expand existing facilities. Investment incentives often have short-run
impacts on investment decisions. A price subsidy should not be seen as a source of long-term profit. Typical
questions are whether and how the incentives affect the decision of the investor on retaining the investment.
The desk research focused on reviewing three issues: i) the current state of Viet Nam’s energy supply and demand
and the structure of its energy industry; ii) the laws and regulations that govern the Vietnamese energy industry,
including those that, although not targeted at energy, are nonetheless relevant to energy development, such as
laws and regulations concerning tax and investment in general; and iii) general issues that affect renewable energy
markets, such as ease of doing business. Sources reviewed included government documentation, research papers
and news media.
Interview questions were tailored to suit each respondent’s background or institution, but all focused on how best to
develop renewable energy in Viet Nam. Respondents were asked to identify the main impediments to developing the
renewable energy industry, to critique current investment incentives, and to suggest alternative incentive schemes
the government could pursue to attract investment.
The study focused on gathering data from the Ministry of Industry and Trade and other relevant government
agencies that influence policy-making processes together with international donors. At the industry level, the impact
of investment incentives on wind power, solar photovoltaic (PV), biogas, small hydro and biomass energy sectors
was conducted.
The study first provides a summary of the energy sector in Viet Nam in Section 3. It then gives an overview of
the country’s investment framework, focusing on investment incentives available to the renewable energy sector in
Section 4. Section 5 analyzes the extent to which existing incentives have adequately addressed investment barriers
for Viet Nam’s key renewable energy technologies. Finally, Section 6 summarizes the report’s key conclusions and
provides a number of recommendations to help improve investment policies.
Table 1 shows the different sources of energy used in Viet Nam from 2000 to 2009, while Figure 1 illustrates final
energy consumption by sector.
TABLE 1: ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN 2000, 2005 & 2009 (IN KILOTONNE OF OIL EQUIVALENT [KTOE])
AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (%)
ENERGY CONSUMPTION* 2000 2005 2009
2000–2009
a. Solid** 4,372 8,342 12,645 12.5
b. Liquid*** 7,917 12,336 16,607 8.6
c. Gas 1,441 4,908 7,290 19.7
d. Hydro electricity 4,314 3,835 6,785 5.2
e. Renewable energy 14,191 14,794 17,732 0.4
Total 32,235 44,215 61,059 6.8
Source: Viet Nam Energy Statistics, 2009.
* Primary energy consumption + net import (import–export) secondary consumption
** Solid fuels including coal and lignite
*** Liquid—includes crude oil
Industry Agriculture
39.9%
Transportation
Residential Residential
33.4% Industry
Commerce & Services
The industrial sector consumes the bulk of energy (39.9 per cent) for processing and industrial manufacturing of
steel and construction materials. An increase in approved projects in this sector has led to growing demand for
electricity. Residential energy consumption (33.4 per cent) and transport (22 per cent) have also experienced
significant demand increases (Ha, 2012). Shares for energy consumption in agriculture and commerce and services
sectors remain low, accounting for 1.2 per cent and 3.5 per cent of total energy consumed in 2010 (Ha, 2012).
TABLE 2: ENERGY PRODUCTION FOR YEARS 2000, 2005, AND 2009, IN KTOE
ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (%)
ENERGY PRODUCTION 2000 2005 2009
2000 – 2009
a. Solid* 13,137 19,092 24,480 7.2
b. Liquid 9,076 19,051 16,970 7.2
c. Gas 1,194 6,204 7,290 22.7
d. Hydro electricity 3,583 3,835 6,785 7.3
e. Renewable energy 14,794 14,722
Sub-total 26,990 62,976 70,247 11.2
Net import (import–export) n/a 17,150 13,787
Total 26,990 80,126 84,034
Source: Viet Nam Energy Statistics, 2009.
* Solid fuels including coal and lignite
FIGURE 2: ENERGY PRODUCTION BY FUEL SOURCE (%) FOR THE YEARS 2000 TO 2010
Source: Ha, 2012.
In Viet Nam, Vietnam Electricity (EVN) takes the leading role in power generation, transmission and distribution, as
per the Power Development Master Plan VII (Decision 1208/QD-TTg, 2011). Viet Nam’s electricity generation has
increased from 26,562 gigawatt hours (GWh) in 2000 to approximately 100,000 GWh1 in 2010, representing an
average annual growth rate of approximately 13 per cent (as illustrated in Figure 3). Additional generation capacity of
4,100 megawatts (MW) will be required per year on average during the 2011 to 2015 period to meet rising demand.
Presently, there are 29 power plants under construction with a total capacity of 10,029 MW, including 20 hydropower
plants and nine thermal power plants. Nuclear power plants with a generation capacity of 2,000 MW are also being
developed (Decision 1208/QD-TTg, 2011).
EVN power plants contribute roughly 68 per cent of electricity generated and non-EVN power plants (includes independent power
1
producers [IPPs] and other government generators) provide 32 per cent (Viet Nam Regulatory Authority of Viet Nam, 2010).
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Petro Vietnam
12%
The presence of IPPs in the Vietnamese power market is still limited by rigid regulatory policies such as those associated
with agreeing on an acceptable “financeable” tariff or per unit electricity price for power purchase agreements (PPAs).
The low off-take price for electricity is a key factor hindering the participation of IPPs in the power market (Laykin,
2009). According to EVN, the number of power-generating projects under the Power Development Master Plan VI
(17 IPP projects and two build–operate–transfer [BOT] projects) has yet to meet the targets of developing 47 power
projects under both IPP and BOT investment schemes by 2015.
Constraints around investment capital are a key barrier to private sector investment in the energy market. A private
company is required to have equity capital equivalent to at least 20 per cent of the total investment for an IPP project
(EVN, 2012). This means the remaining 80 per cent of the required capital will need to be financed by bank loans
from the Viet Nam Development Bank (VDB), or a foreign commercial bank backed by the Government’s credit
guarantee scheme. The following table sets out a selection of renewable power projects being developed by IPPs for
the period 2011–2015 (principally hydropower projects).
Prime Minister
New and
Electricity of Renewable Energy
Institute of Energy
Vietnam Group Department
(EVN)
• V
ietnam Electricity (EVN) is the most important institution in implementing policies and regulations for
renewable energy.
• G
eneral Energy Department under control of the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT). The Department
helps MoIT to implement management functions relating to the energy sector.
• Renewable Energy Department is in charge of designing plans for renewable energy development.
• T
he Electricity Regulatory Authority of Viet Nam (ERAV) is a department under the Ministry of Industry and
Trade. This department manages and regulates electricity market-related activities (also including electricity
from renewable sources).
• A
t the provincial level, the provincial Departments of Industry and Trade (DOIT) are responsible for
implementing state management directives for the energy sector, including renewable energy.
• T
he Institute of Energy plays an important role in conducting research into renewable energy issues. In 2007,
it established the “Center for Renewable Energy and Clean Development Mechanisms.”
• I ndependent power producers (IPPs) generate electricity from renewable technologies in Viet Nam. In
most cases, they must sell their electricity to EVN. The electricity is sold at rates set by power-purchase
agreements or in line with the national feed-in tariffs.
• R
enewable energy companies, such as biofuel producers, solar PV, wind and other renewable energy
companies.
The general policy targets for renewable energy are reflected in the Decision 1855/QD-TTg, which approves
Vietnam’s national energy development strategy up to 2020. The national energy development strategy sets targets
for the shares of renewable energies in the total primary energy production at 5 per cent and 11 per cent in 2020 and
2050, respectively.
Source: MoIT, 2012; Government of Vietnam, 2011a; Government of Vietnam, 2009, January 14; Government of Vietnam, 2008, July 14; Government of Vietnam,
2007, December 27; Government of Vietnam, 2007, November; Government of Vietnam, 2005.
TABLE 7: KEY PROJECTS IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY IN VIET NAM
REF. PROJECT DONOR/ PROJECT VALUE
PROJECT TITLE PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NO. IMPLEMENTATION AGENCY & DURATION
1. Renewable Energy a. Asian Development Bank a. SDR Primary objective is to promote rural electrification
Development (ADB), Viet Nam 102,161,000** and renewable energy in Viet Nam to benefit ethnic
and Network b. Power Companies (PC) PC1, and a technical minority communities in remote and poorer parts
Expansion and PC2, and PC3 under EVN assistance of the country. Location: Lai Chau and Dien Bien,
Rehabilitation grant of Quang Nam and Hue, TraVinh and Soc Trang, and
for Remote US$2,500,000 Quang Tri province.
Communes Sector
Project b. 2009–2015
2. Viet Nam a. The World Bank, Viet Nam; a. US$318 million Aims to provide (i) a refinancing facility for
Renewable Energy b. Swiss Secretariat for Economic participating commercial banks (PBs) in lending to
Development b. 2009–2014 eligible renewable-based projects whose capacity
Affairs (SECO)
Project to increase does not exceed 30 MW developed by private
the supply of a. MoIT sponsors; and (ii) technical assistance to MoIT for
electricity to the reviewing applications, monitoring the eligibility
national grid from b. Investors in small hydropower of PBs and developers, project management, as
renewable energy plants well as capacity building for PBs and developers in
sources c. Financial institutions preparation, appraisal, financing, and implementing
renewable-based projects according to international
best practices.
3. Viet Nam a. The Global Environment Facility 2008–2009 Technical Assistance Project assisting MoIT in
National Energy (GEF) administered by the establishing technical standards for Solar Water
Efficiency Program World Bank; Heaters (SWH). Demonstrating the benefits of
(VNEEP)— Pilot SWHs for demand-side management and energy
Program on Solar b. MoIT efficiency (DSM/EE) through pilot installation in
Water Heaters three major cities: Ha Noi, Ho Chi Minh City and Da
Nang.
4. Biogas Program on The Netherlands’ Directorate Phase 1: 2003– Provides a flat-rate subsidy of VND1 million in phase
building domestic General for International 2006 1, and VND1.2 million in phase 2, respectively, to
biogas plants and Cooperation (DGIS) and the Phase 2: eligible household to build biogas plants. Equivalent
the development government of Viet Nam 2007–2012 to around 25 to 30 per cent of the investment
of domestic biogas represented by Ministry costs for the complete installation (digester volume
sector of Agriculture and Rural EUR 7.5 million of 6 to 8 cubic metres). The goal is to promote
Development (MARD) environmental protection in rural areas, improve the
health of the rural population, create rural jobs, and
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
5. Quality and Safety Asian Development Bank (ADB), US$110 million Biogas development with a budget of US$22.25
Enhancement Viet Nam million to support the installation of 20,000
of Agricultural 2009–2014 domestic biogas plants. Disbursed through
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural
Products Development Ministry (MARD) the Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural
and Biogas Development (VBARD) and Central Credit Fund
Development Central Credit Fund (CCF) to 40,000 households, installing an additional
Project (QSEAP) 100,000 units over a five-year period (2009–2014).
6. Wind power Vietnam Renewable Energy Joint US$70 million Wind power project with capacity of 27 MW
project in Binh stock company (RENV) and invested and implemented in Binh Thuan province.
Thuan province, German Fuhrlaender AG 2008–2011 Phase 1 completed with five wind turbines in place
Viet Nam connected to the national power grid as of August
2009.
The Government has established a coordinated strategy in line with region-based planning and investment
mechanisms supporting renewable energy development. This is in response to a number of barriers facing renewable
energy, including a lack of resource assessments looking at the potential of renewable energy, and poor integration
of energy and renewable energy projects into national energy efficiency programs. The development of a strategy
to promote renewable energy has allowed for better alignment with government programs supporting rural
electrification, forestry development, poverty alleviation and drinking water resource management. The key laws
include:
a. Investment law No. 59/2005/QH11, which provides a legal framework for both domestic and international
businesses/investors, covering provisions on specific types of incentives to attract investment in various areas
and sectors/industries, respectively, categorized as “conditional,” “encouraged” and “special encouraged” as
follows:
• P
roduction of renewable energies; high-value technological products, bio- and information technologies;
mechanical manufacturing activities.
• H
igh-tech, modern technologies, ecological and environmental protection, research and development
(R&D).
• Labour-intensive industries.
• Forestry, agriculture, fishery industries and animal husbandry.
These sectors include areas related to renewable energy development and deployment.
• Geographic areas entitled to investment incentives located in regions with poor socioeconomic development,
industrial parks, export-processing zones, zones producing high-tech equipment and economic zones.
Investment incentives are provided through taxation, including favourable income tax rates, low import duties and
fees; loss transfer; accelerated depreciation of assets; preferential land rights; and special cases entitled to extended
investment incentives.
Investment incentives offered by the Government prioritize the following areas: (i) technology transfer (with a focus
on development of advanced technologies and those used to manufacture new and innovative products), activities
that can increase production capacity, while enhancing competitiveness, product quality, and the efficient use of
production inputs and natural resources in general; (ii) deliver human resources development; (iii) investments in
infrastructure systems in industrial parks, export-processing zones, high-tech zones and economic zones.
The following table outlines Viet Nam’s tax policy and the exemptions provided to specific industries.
b. In 2012, the Government issued Decision 1231/QD-TTg in relation to the Small and Medium-Sized (SME)
Development Plan II for the period 2011–2015, setting up eight key measures: (i) improving the legal
framework for market entry and exit; (ii) improving SMEs’ access to finance; (iii) support of technological
innovation and application of new technologies for SMEs; (iv) human resource development with a focus on
capacity building for business management for SMEs; (v) promoting the development of industrial clusters
and improved access to land; (vi) provision of information and market expansion; (xii) setting up institutional
systems supporting SME development; and (xiii) the implementation of an SME development plan (SME
Development Plan II), in particular the establishment of an SME Development Fund.
a. In February 2008, the Government approved Decree 29/2008/QD-TTg establishing special industrial,
processing, economic and border economic zones. This decree applies to state management agencies,
organizations and individuals involved in investment and business activities in these special zones.
c. Viet Nam has 256 industrial zones and 20 economic zones located nationwide as of February 2011 (UNIDO,
2011). Table 9 illustrates a selection of economic zones.
The Ministry of Industry and Trade has been reviewing the implementation of Decision 105/2009/QD-TTg in
coordination with line ministries, local authorities and relevant stakeholders. During the two-year policy review
period, the Government sought to suspend new plans to establish or expand existing industrial clusters nationwide.
In Table 10, special encouraged manufacturing projects are entitled to a CIT rate of 10 per cent for 15 years from the
commencement of operations. These projects may be granted a tax holiday for four years beginning from the first
year of profitable operations or a 50 per cent CIT reduction for nine years (starting from the fourth year revenue is
generated), whichever comes first.
Decree 151/2006/ND-CP (December 20, 2006) introduced investment and export credits covering construction
costs for small hydropower projects (with a maximum capacity of 100 MW) and wind farms. The loan size for each
eligible project is up to 70 per cent of the total investment capital of the project (excluding working capital). In special
cases where projects are in need of funds exceeding 70 per cent of the total investment capital, and a bank loan is
required, it must be endorsed by the Ministry of Finance and approved by the Prime Minister. The investment loan
should not exceed 12 years with an interest rate equivalent to government bond interest rates with a term of five
years plus 1 per cent for loans in VND. The government can provide loan guarantees in cases where investors have to
obtain loans from other financial institutions. This Decree was amended by Decree 106/2008/ND-CP (September
19, 2008) making all renewable energy projects eligible.
The biogas program (with technical assistance from the Dutch government represented by SNV) focused on the
development of biogas technology that can provide a sustainable energy source and improve the livelihood and quality
of life of rural farmers at the household level. This program promotes a public–private partnership model aimed at
enhancing the participation of the private sector in the commercialization of the technology and the development of
credit structures provided by financial institutions to facilitate access to finance. There is also an investment incentive
scheme for biomass and biogas technically assisted by GIZ with funding from Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW)
Development Bank which is awaiting Government approval.
“Avoided Cost Tariff” is defined as “the electricity tariff calculated by avoided costs of the national power grid when
1 kWh is generated to the distribution power grid from a small renewable energy power plant” (“Energy Profile
Vietnam,” n.d.). The “avoided cost” is defined as “the production cost per 1 kWh of the most expensive power
generating unit in the national power grid, which would be avoided if the buyer purchases 1 kWh of electricity from
a small renewable energy power plant instead” (“Energy Profile Vietnam,” n.d.). Avoided cost tariffs are applied in
Wind Power
Announced in a Circular (96/2012/T-BTC) by the Ministry of Finance (MoF, 2012 June 8), a price subsidy of
US$0.078 per kWh will be provided to wind farms (with a fixed purchasing price at US$0.068/kWh plus a US$0.01
subsidy financed from the state budget through the Environment Protection Fund). The unit subsidy for purchasing
the electrical output of grid-connected wind farms is VND207/kWh, with the level of subsidy estimated as the
subsidy per unit multiplied by the level of purchased electrical output. The level of per-unit support will be adjusted
based on decisions by the Prime Minister. ENV, which purchases the power using a standardized power purchase
contract from wind developers, is entitled to a price subsidy from the central government.4
The price subsidy is formulated on the following basis. The investment costs for wind power farms equipped with
new technology that meets the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards are paid at US$2,250
per kW. The average electricity price is calculated at US$0.1068 per kWh equivalent. Alternatively, if the investment
costs are US$1,700 per kW, then the average electricity price is estimated at US$0.086 per kWh. This lower cost
may be applicable to wind power developers investing in cheaper technologies as estimated by the MoIT.
The following table explains how these two technology cost structures and price subsidies for wind power are
calculated.
TABLE 12: EXPLANATION OF WIND POWER COST STRUCTURES AND PRICE SUBSIDIES
FORMULATION SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2
Target capacity by 2020 of 1,000 MW With the price subsidy of US$0.01 per With the price subsidy of US$0.04
of wind power x 1,000 kW x 365 days x kWh (VND 207/kWh) x 2 billion kWh, (VND828)/kWh or the purchase price
24 hours x 90% (estimated loss at 10%) the total amount planned for subsidy is by EVN of US$0.108/kWh to secure
x 25% (the efficiency of wind turbines VND414 billion, divided by 20 million adequate return on investment and
based on wind velocity conditions in Viet customers who pay for electricity directly reasonable profit for investors who invest
Nam) = 1.971 billion kWh, equivalent to (by 2020): the average amount each in high tech equipment, the total amount
2 billion kWh outlined in Power Master household will pay is about VND20,700 to be spent on the subsidy is VND1,656
Plan VII. annually or VND1,725 monthly. billion, divided by 20 million customers:
the average extra amount each customer
will pay by 2020 is VND81,800 annually
or VND6,810 monthly.
Table 13 summarizes the status of electricity prices and price subsidies for renewable energy projects.
Subject to changes in the exchange rate between US$ and VND.
3
ENV is responsible for reporting the following data annually to the ERAV on May 31: (i) general information on wind farms with signed
4
power purchase agreements for the next year (including the name of the wind farm, investor, installed capacity, output, location; and the
contract’s value, date and number); (ii) amount of electricity purchased from the wind farm in the previous year; (iii) expected output to
be contracted with the wind farm operator in the current year and subsequent years set for each wind farm, and (iv) the expected total
amount subsidized.
Based on a meeting with a representative of the Department of Renewable Energy under MoIT in December 2012,
it was confirmed that the legal framework for investment incentives is in place, and eligible wind farms are now
preparing applications for the price subsidy.
The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MoIT) established investment incentive mechanisms based on an avoided cost
tariff for electricity generated by small-scale hydropower plants.5 As such, there are approximately 200 small-scale
hydropower projects registered for development with total capacity of 4,067 MW (Phuong & Huong, 2012). The
following table highlights avoided cost tariffs for small-scale hydropower.
TABLE 14: APPLIED AVOIDED COST TARIFF FOR THE PERIOD 2009–2012, IN VND/KWH
DESCRIPTION 2009 2010 2011 2012
Capacity cost accounting for three 1,674 1,633 1,772 1,805
regions (North, Centre, and South)
Avoided Cost Tariff 916 954.52
Sources: MoIT, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2012; Decisions on annual ACT.
• V
iet Nam still does not have a clear legal framework guiding policies on renewable energy projects. The
policies are separately stipulated in different laws leading to confusion in their application. In many cases,
these laws and regulations are contradictory. For example, a foreign investor interested in investing in a
hydropower project in Viet Nam noted that, although the project was exempt from import duties for imported
machinery and equipment, there was significant red tape relating to customs processes. In some cases,
costs associated with unofficial fees and red tape were higher than the benefits received from the import tax
exemption. Furthermore, as noted by a manager of a sugar company investing in a biomass project, although
this project can be exempted from certain taxes, these entitlements were still awaiting government approval.
• T
he low price of renewable electricity is a major hurdle for investors and affects returns on investment. The
price at which EVN purchases electricity from renewable energy projects is currently lower than electricity
production costs for wind or solar PV. Also, it appears investors in electricity production from biogas and
biomass power projects do not currently receive price support from the government. Due to the low price
for renewable electricity and returns from investing in renewable energy, the number of new projects is low
compared with other industries, and it takes longer for investors to recoup their investments.
• P
rocedures for establishing and operating renewable energy projects often require the involvement of a number
of authorities, resulting in high transaction costs as project developers must submit the same information
to several government authorities at different points of time. Effective coordination and clarification of
responsibilities among stakeholders is required to reduce the existing fiscal and technical barriers facing the
renewable energy sector. Government officials often lack adequate experience in establishing and operating
investment incentive policies supporting the renewable energy sector.
• T
rust in government guarantees is a critical issue when foreign investors evaluate investment opportunities.
Some investors suggested that government guarantees are unreliable.6 These investors have encountered
difficulties in seeking loans for their renewable power projects although legal documents confirm that
they are eligible to access available soft loans. Other investors pointed out the unreliability of government
macroeconomic policies. For example, Viet Nam’s foreign exchange reserves are low and could affect any
guarantees relating to the availability of foreign currencies. Similarly, high inflation rates and the devaluation
of Viet Nam’s currency as part of government policies are also a concern for investors.
6
Oliver Massmann, managing partner of Duane Morris Vietnam LLC, confirmed this point in a presentation titled “Investment in wind
energy in Vietnam: The right time has come?” (Massmann, 2012).
Current investment incentives provide modest benefits for small hydropower projects, according to the investors
interviewed. One investor in a small hydropower project noted the application of the Avoided Cost Tariff and
Standardized Power Purchase Agreement with the government allowed his hydropower plant to sell electricity at
a higher price compared with electricity prices in pre-2008 periods. From 2009, grid-connected renewable energy
projects with an installed capacity lower than 30 MW can apply for the Avoided Cost Tariff. The standardized power
purchase agreement provided more opportunities to negotiate with EVN on the purchase price of electricity. In 2012,
the Ministry of Industry and Trade approved an increase of 5 per cent in the purchase price of electricity compared
with 2011 prices for more than 10 small hydropower plants.
Some small hydropower projects have also received substantial benefits from the Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM). According to the GIZ Renewable Energy Project (2012), among the 143 projects operating within the CDM,
about 69 per cent (98 projects) were small hydropower projects.
The Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam (EARV) sets consumer electricity price ceilings to which Vietnam
Electricity (EVN) (the state monopoly purchasing and distributing power) must adhere when selling to electricity to
consumers. EVN is unable to pay more for electricity purchased from generators because of price regulating policies.
According to Decision 130, EVN is allowed to pay a higher price for electricity bought from IPPs than the price sold
to consumers. However, the price for electricity bought from IPPs or other generators is still lower than the real cost
of electricity production incurred by the generator. Funding for these subsidies is limited to the amount set aside in
a capped government fund. For example, in 2010, the solar PV company Power RE Co. Ltd. invested US$17 million in
a wind farm in Phú Quý District, Binh Thuan Province. The project’s installed capacity of 6 MW (two turbines) can
supply electricity to the local area; however, as noted by Pham Cuong, Company Director, the company had to spend
US$480,000 of its own operating capital to cover the losses incurred by the project (“VN ‘wind power capital,’”
2012). He explained that “[t]he power produced by the wind farm is bought by the local power sector at 6.8 cent
[sic], plus 1 cent subsidized by the government . . . But we will only be able to break even at 10.36 cent [sic] a kWh,
although it will also take as long as 12 years” (“VN ‘wind power capital,’” 2012). The off-take or purchase price of
electricity received by a generator is lower than those in nearby countries such as Thailand (US$0.89/kWh), the
Philippines (US$0.18 cent/kWh) and Cambodia (US$0.18/kWh) (Cooper, 2012). Hence, it is hard to attract foreign
investment in renewable energy due to the uncompetitive electricity off-take prices provided by EVN.
In Ho Chi Minh City, the Go Cat sanitary landfill in Binh Tan District, with an area of 25 hectares, is using landfill
gas to produce electricity. The project cost US$20.8 million, of which 60 per cent was funded by the government
of Netherlands and 40 per cent by the state budget of Ho Chi Minh City (Nguyen, 2004). The company signed a
contract to sell electricity to EVN at US$0.04/kWh without any price subsidy from the city authorities. According to
the operators of the plant, the electricity price agreed with EVN is too low to cover the cost of production. As explained
Foreign investors interested in biogas projects ideally are seeking an electricity price of US$0.07/kWh, a price which
is not accepted by EVN. This case explains why many biogas projects in Ho Chi Minh City, such as those invested in
by Keppel Seghers Engineering Company (Singapore) (at Dong Thanh) and the International Environmental Energy
Corporation (U.S.) (at Phuoc Hiep), were cancelled during the last five years due to a lack of capital and low electricity
prices on offer (DuyNguyên, 2012).
One manager of a company investing in a biomass plant said: “Why [have] we invested in this biomass plant? We
expected a long-term profit. We knew the incentive policies but we haven’t got any support from the government
so far” (Manager of Ninh Hòa Sugar Joint Stock Company, personal communication, 2012). Investors in small-scale
biogas projects admitted that when making a decision to invest in renewable energy they do consider investment
incentives provided by the government. However, they usually do not have sufficient information on the incentives
when trying to identify investment opportunities. For investors in large-scale projects, investment incentives seem
not to have affected their location decision.
Many practical issues hinder the use of CBAs in assessing the implementation of investment incentives. For example,
information used to evaluate their costs and benefits in general is not transparent. The Ministry of Finance (MoF)
is responsible for estimating and recording related data; however, this data is generally not publicly available. The
amount and quality of information, especially financial data, may vary widely according to the level of secrecy or
commercial sensitivity. Identification of costs and benefits is not straightforward even when transparency and
accountability of information is adequate. The costs of incentives encompass many intangible components such as
opportunity costs, administrative costs and social costs relating to market inefficiencies generated by the incentive
policies. Currently, it is almost impossible to directly estimate administrative costs related to these policies, as the
administration system covers a variety of activities, of which investment incentives are but one component.
Evaluating the beneficial impact of investment incentives is also difficult because they stem from a number of
sources other than the use of incentives. When asking one investor to list determinants for selecting an investment
location, they identified a range of factors, including available infrastructure and labour costs, and not necessarily the
availability of investment incentives (Le An Khang, personal communication, 2012).
This study provides a preliminary assessment of incentives based on interviews with investors, and these suggest
that current investment incentives have had a limited effect on investment decisions. Most stakeholders interviewed
thought incentives were not the key determinant in selecting a specific site or geographic area. Investors in renewable
energy felt the current legal framework and incentive mechanism were not adequately developed. Procedures
for investors to apply for incentives were often considered opaque and not well understood by the investment
community. Some local investors commented that they decided not to submit an application for a price subsidy
due to the time required to complete the application. Foreign investors expressed concern over the reliability of
government guarantees backing fair prices for electricity or the ongoing terms of the soft loans.
Although the effects of investment incentives promoting renewable energy investment are still limited, their role in
future renewable energy development is likely to increase. Viet Nam’s huge potential for renewable energy combined
with overall increasing demand for renewable energy sources is considered attractive to investors.
6.2 Recommendations
The research suggests the following recommendations:
• E
nsure the application system for investment incentives is easy to understand and transparent. Presently,
many investors are unsure how to apply for incentives.
• T
he power system regime is not predictable, and there is limited market competition, which acts as a
disincentive for investors. The Vietnamese government should support the development of an energy market
that treats all investors equally and allows investment incentives to work.
• A
lthough investment incentives are not a critical factor in determining investment decisions in renewable
energy projects, they are still important in retaining existing investments and encouraging further investment
to develop an existing facility. Further research is required to understand the costs and benefits of the
incentives currently on offer, so that they can be improved over time.
• I nvestment in renewable energy depends a lot on the performance of one actor—the EVN. Investors view
electricity prices for renewable energy projects and fair competition in the electricity market as critical factors.
The current price subsidy should be revised in situations where the government is unable to subsidize EVN to
cover losses from purchasing electricity from renewable energy projects run by IPPs.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). (2012). Renewable energy project. Retrieved from
http://www.renewableenergy.org.vn/index.php?page=small-hydro-power
GIZ/MoIT. (2011). Information on wind energy in Viet Nam. Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Electricity Regulatory Authority of Viet Nam. (2010). Power market developments in Vietnam. Retrieved from http://
www.theapex.org/images/uploads/Dinh_The_Phuc-Power_Market_Developments_in_Vietnam.pdf
Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2012). Country analysis. Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/cabs/
Vietnam/Full.html
Government of Vietnam. (2003). Prime Minister Decree 102/2003/ND-CP. Retrieved from http://thuvienphapluat.vn/
archive/Nghi-dinh/Nghi-dinh-102-2003-ND-CP-su-dung-nang-luong-tiet-kiem-hieu-qua-vb51315t11.aspx
Government of Vietnam. (2005). Electricity Law No. 28/2004/QH11 approved by the National Assembly on 3 December
2004 and effective 1 July 2005.
Government of Vietnam. (2005, November 29). Investment Law No. 59/2005/QH11 endorsed by the National Assembly
on 29 November 2005.
Government of Vietnam. (2006, April 14). Decision 79/2006/QD -TTg dated April 14, 2006 by Prime Minister on
approving the National Strategic Program on Energy Saving and Effective Use.
Government of Vietnam. (2006, August 30). Decision No. 30/2006/QD-BCN dated 30 August 2006 by Minister of
Industry on the management of investment–construction of independent power plant projects.
Government of Vietnam. (2006, September 22). Decree No. 108/2006/ND-CP on providing guidelines in implementation
of a number of articles of law on investment.
Government of Vietnam. (2006, December 20). Decree No. 151/2006/ND-CP dated 20 December 2006 on state
investment credit and export credit.
Government of Vietnam. (2007). Decree No. 04/2007/ND-CP on Environmental protection charge on waste water.
Government of Vietnam. (2007, August 2). Decision No. 130/2007/QD-TTg dated 02 August, 2007 on some financial
mechanisms, and policies for investment projects under the clean development mechanism.
Government of Vietnam. (2007, November). Decision No. 177/ 2007/QD-TTg dated November 2007 on approving the
scheme on development of biofuel up to 2015, with a vision to 2025.
Government of Vietnam. (2007, December 27). Decision No. 1855/QD-TTg dated 27/12/2007 by Prime Minister
approving the “Viet Nam National Energy Development Strategy up to 2020, Vision to 2050.”
Government of Vietnam. (2008, July 14). Inter-ministerial Circular No. 58/2008/TTLT-BTC-BTN&MT dated 4 July 2008
by Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment providing guidelines for executing some articles
of Decision No. 130/2007/QDTTg dated 2 August 2007, issued by the Prime Minister on a number of financial mechanisms
and policies for the implementation of CDM projects.
Government of Vietnam. (2008, July 18). Decision 18/QD-BCT dated July 18, 2008 by Prime Minister on promulgation
of regulation on avoided cost tariff and standardized power purchase agreement for small renewable energy power plants.
Government of Vietnam. (2008, September 19). Decree No. 106/2008/ND-CP dated 19 September 2008 on amending
and supplementing some articles of Governmental Decree No. 151/2006/ND-CP dated 20 December 2006 on state
investment credit and export credit.
Government of Vietnam (2008, December 11). Decree No. 124/2008/ND-CP on Implementing the Law of Corporate
Income Tax.
Government of Vietnam. (2009, January 14). Governmental Decree No. 04/2009/ND-CP dated 14 January 2009 on
incentives and support for environmental protection activities.
Government of Vietnam (2009, August 19). Decision No. 105/2009/QD-TTg on promulgating the Regulation on
Management of Industrial Complex.
Government of Vietnam. (2010, August 13). Governmental Decree No. 87/2010/ND-CP dated 13 August 2010 on detailed
stipulations on the implementation of some Articles of Law on export and import taxes.
Government of Vietnam. (2011a). Decision 1208/QD-TTg on the National Power Development Master Plan for the period
2011 to 2020, with a vision toward 2030. Retrieved from http://phapluattp.vn/20120909032127703p0c1065/tai-
quyet-dinh-1208qdttg-ngay-49.htm
Government of Vietnam. (2011, July 21). Decision No. 1208/QD-TTg on 21 July 2011 (or Power Development Plan 7 for the
2011–2020 period with the vision to 2030).
Government of Vietnam. (2011, August 8). Decree 75/2011/NĐ-CP on state investment credit and export credit.
Government of Vietnam (2012, September 7). Decision No. 1231/QD-TTg on approving the plan for developing medium
and small enterprises 2011 – 2015.
Ha, N. K. (2012). Viet Nam energy overview. Institute of Energy. Retrieved from http://www.ievn.com.vn/en/index.
php/thong-tin-tu-lieu/bai-viet/224-vietnam-energy-overview
Laykin, J. (2009). Vietnam promises, promises. Independent Power Producers Forum. Retrieved from http://www.
ippfpowerasia.com/artitcles/pdf/nonpublished/Vietnam_Promises-Jan11-20090424-updated.pdf
Massmann, O. (2012) Investment in wind energy in Vietnam: The right time has come? A presentation. DUANE
MORRIS VIETNAM LLC.
Ministry of Finance (MoF) (2012, June 8). Circular 96/2012/TT - BTC on Guiding the Financial Mechanism to Support
Electricity Price for Grid connected Wind Power Projects.
MoIT (2008, December 24). Decision 74/QD-DTDL on Avoided Cost Tariff for 2009.
MoIT (2009, December 30). Decision 73/QD-DTDL on Avoided Cost Tariff for 2010.
MoIT (2010, December 31). Decision 66/QD-DTDL on Annual Avoided Cost Tariff for 2011.
MoIT (2012, January 19). Decision 06/QD-DTDL on Annual Avoided Cost Tariff for 2012.
MoIT (2010, May 10). Circular 18/2010/TT-BCT on Regulating the Operation of the Competitive Electricity Generation
Market.
MoIT (2010, October 18). Power market developments in Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.theapex.org/images/
uploads/Dinh_The_Phuc-Power_Market_Developments_in_Vietnam.pdf
MoIT (2011, December 30); Circular 45/2011/TT-BTC on the Amendment and Supplementation of a Number of
Articles of the Circular No.18/2010/TT-BCT of May 10, 2010 of the Ministry of Industry and Trade on Defining the
Operation of a Competitive Electricity Generation Market.
MoIT (2012, Nov. 12). Circular 32/2012/TT-BCT Providing the Development of Wind Power Projects and the Model
Electricity Trading Contract for Wind Power Projects.
Nguyen, Q. (2004). Go Cat Landfill quality improving project. Energy Conservation Research and Development Center.
Phuong, N., & Huong, H. (2012). Development of small hydropower in Viet Nam: Existing concerns from investors. Retrieved
from http://dddn.com.vn/20120711100550605cat7/phat-trien-thuy-dien-nho-nhieu-noi-lo.htm
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2012) Vietnam pocket tax book, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/en_
VN/vn/publications/2012/assets/PwC_Vietnam_Vietnam_Pocket_Tax_Book_2012_English.pdf
SGGP. (2007). Thị trường “điệnsạch” TPHCM đa dạng nhưng nhiều rào cản [In Vietnamese]. Retrieved from http://
www.sggp.org.vn/moitruongdothi/2007/5/97707/
The Office of Government (2005, October 19). Decision 258/2005/QD-TTg on the Role, Powers, Duties and Organizational
Structure of the Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam under the Ministry of Industry and Trade.
Thomas, K. (2007). Investment incentives: Growing use, uncertain benefits, uneven controls. International Institute for
Sustainable Development.
Tuan, N. A. (2012). A case study on power sector restructuring in Vietnam. Pacific Energy Summit. Summit Papers.
Retrieved from http://www.nbr.orgww
Tung, P., Mai, V., & Wasielke, A. (2012, March). Status of wind power development and financing of these projects in Viet
Nam. GIZ Wind Energy Project.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2004). Incentives (UNCTAD Series on Issues
in International Investment Agreements). United Nations. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/Docs/iteiit20035_
en.pdf
United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2011). Viet Nam industrial development report 2011. United
Nations.
U.S. Commercial Service. (2012). Vietnam market for medical equipment. Retrieved from http://export.gov/vietnam/
build/groups/public/@eg_vn/documents/webcontent/eg_vn_051777.pdf
Vietnam Electricity (EVN). (2012). Investment capital for power project: Solutions? Retrieved from http://www.evn.com.
vn/Home/Detail/ tabid/84/TopicId/1/ItemId/4362/View/2/CateId/49/language/vi-VN/Default.aspx
Vietnam Energy Statistics (2009). Country Energy Profile. Retrieved from http://www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/
Publications/PDF/CNPP2011_CD/countryprofiles/Vietnam/Vietnam2011.htm
Vietnam Investment Review. (n.d.). List of power plants scheduled to come online until 2020. Retrieved from http://www.
vir.com.vn/data/files/electricity_list.pdf
“VN wind power capital unattractive to investors.” (2012). TuoitreNews. Retrieved from http://www.tuoitrenews.vn/
cmlink/tuoitrenews/business/vn-wind-power-capital-unattractive-to-investors-1.92750
World Bank. (2012). Trung Son hydropower project: Meeting growing energy demands. Retrieved from http://www.
worldbank.org/en/news/2012/11/20/trung-son-hydropower-project-meeting-growing-energy-demands