Learning Activities Activity 1 Opinion Corner
Learning Activities Activity 1 Opinion Corner
Learning Activities Activity 1 Opinion Corner
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Activity 1 Opinion Corner
Directions: After the Marcos dictatorship, the framers of the 1987 Constitution put in place
certain provisions to prevent repeating the tyranny and horrors experienced
during the martial law era from 1972 to 1983. On May 2017, President Duterte
declared Martial law in Mindanao.
Read official reports and documents on the issue and write a short essay answering the
following:
1. What martial law safeguards were provided in the 1987 Constitution?
Today, the 1987 Constitution safeguards our institutions from a repeat of Marcos’
Martial Law regime. The Supreme Court is empowered to review all official acts to
determine if there has been grave abuse of discretion. Congress cannot be padlocked. Martial
Law is limited in duration and effects, even if contemplated by a president. Section 18 of
Article VII of the current Constitution provides:
“Within forty-eight hours from the proclamation of martial law or the suspension
of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, the President shall submit a report in person or
in writing to the Congress. The Congress, voting jointly, by a vote of at least a majority of all
its Members in regular or special session, may revoke such proclamation or suspension,
which revocation shall not be set aside by the President. Upon the initiative of the President,
the Congress may, in the same manner, extend such proclamation or suspension for a period
to be determined by the Congress, if the invasion or rebellion shall persist and public safety
requires it. The Congress, if not in session, shall, within twenty-four hours following such
proclamation or suspension, convene in accordance with its rules without any need of a call.
The Supreme Court may review, in an appropriate proceeding filed by any citizen, the
sufficiency of the factual basis of the proclamation of martial law or the suspension of the
privilege of the writ or the extension thereof, and must promulgate its decision thereon within
thirty days from its filing. A state of martial law does not suspend the operation of the
Constitution, nor supplant the functioning of the civil courts or legislative assemblies, nor
authorize the conferment of jurisdiction on military courts and agencies over civilians where
civil courts are able to function, nor automatically suspend the privilege of the writ.”
2. Do you think the basis of the declaration of martial law in Mindanao sufficient?
Support / explain your answer.
Yes. Such power to declare martial law is found in in Sec. 18, Art. VII of the 1987
Constitution, vested in the president under his commander-in-chief powers. He has three powers
as commander-in-chief: in order to prevent lawless violence, (a) to call out the Armed Forces
(calling out power) when it becomes “necessary”; and in case of invasion or rebellion, and when
the public safety requires it, to (b) suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or (c)
declare martial law. Significantly, the mere declaration of martial law does not automatically
suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. To declare martial law already presupposes a
grave threat to national security — a case of invasion and rebellion — thus warranting careful
exercise of its extraordinary power. As details of the proclamation and events unfold, care must
be taken not to aggravate the situation on the ground and ensure the safety of civilians involved
in the clash. It is also important not to misinform and to carefully study the scope of the
president’s power in making and implementing the declaration. The declaration of martial law
does not suspend the application of basic human rights nor does it supplant the Constitution or
suspend the courts. Like Arroyo’s declaration of martial law over Maguindanao, Duterte’s
proclamation of martial law all over Mindanao must also fulfil the rigid Constitutional
parameters as summarized above. In the end, these parameters still manifest, as Fr. Bernas states,
the Constitution’s “great reluctance to allow the activation of martial law powers and of the
power to suspend the privilege of the writ,” thus calling for renewed vigor in knowing what our
rights are, and in remaining vigilant in their protection.
Activity 2 Philippine Constitutions through the years
Directions: Complete the table below to compare and contrast the 6 constitution framed in the
country. Use separate sheet if necessary.