8/28/2019                                             PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 047
[No. 24119. August 8, 1925]
                      FELIX MARQUEZ, petitioner, vs. THE BOARD OF MEDICAL
                      EXAMINERS and THE SECRETARY-TREASURER OF THE
                      BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, respondents.
                            1. PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS; BOARD OF MEDICAL
                               EXAMINERS; AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE STANDING OF
                               MEDICAL SCHOOLS.—The Board of Medical Examiners has
                               authority to determine whether a
                                                                                               762
                      762                      PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED
                                        Marquez vs. Board of Medical Examiners
                               particular medical college is a reputable school in the sense
                               intended by law; and its determination on this point with respect to
                               a particular institution will not be controlled by the courts.
                            2. ID.; ID.; ID.; RISK AS TO REMOVAL OF SCHOOL FROM
                               ELIGIBLE LIST.— An intending physician upon matriculating in a
                               particular medical college which up to that time has been classified
                               as a reputable school takes upon himself the risk that, before he
                               shall become qualified to take the medical examination, the
                               institution attended by him may be removed from such list.
                      ORIGINAL ACTION in the Supreme Court. Mandamus.
                      The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
                        M. H. de Joya for petitioner.
                        Acting Attorney-General Reyes for respondents.
                      STREET, J.:
                      This is an original proceeding in this court by which the petitioner,
                      Felix Marquez, seeks to obtain a writ of mandamus against the
                      respondents, the Board of Medical Examiners and the Secretary-
                      Treasurer of the Board of Medical Examiners, requiring them to
                      admit the petitioner to the physicians' examinations conducted, or to
                      be conducted by the respondents in the City of Manila. To the
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cd897dd943e76fd90003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False              1/3
8/28/2019                                             PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 047
                      original complaint the respondents answered, and to the answer a
                      demurrer was interposed in behalf of the petitioner.
                         It appears that the petitioner is a graduate of the Chicago Medical
                      College, having received the degree of M.D. from said institution on
                      June 8 of the year 1922. No question appears to have been made by
                      the respondents with respect to the petitioner's qualifications for the
                      physicians' examinations in other respects, but they have denied him
                      admission to the examinations on the ground that the Chicago
                      Medical College, where the petitioner was graduated, has been
                      classified as a Class C medical college by the National Medical
                      State Board of the United States. For this reason the respondents, in
                      accordance with the regulations of the
                                                                                            763
                                        VOL. 47, AUGUST 8, 1925                             763
                                      Marquez vs. Board of Medical Examiners
                      board now in effect, have denied the requisite standing to said
                      institution and excluded the petitioner.
                          It is not denied by the respondents that prior to the adoption of
                      the present regulations, and prior to the date when the Chicago
                      Medical School was classified as a Class C medical college, the
                      Board of Medical Examiners for the Philippine Islands had accepted
                      diplomas of graduation from said medical college as sufficient proof
                      of proficiency in medical knowledge to admit a graduate to the
                      examinations held in these Islands; and as late as October 29, 1923,
                      said board acted favorably upon the application of one Dr. Mariano
                      M. Lazatin, who was graduated from said school in the year 1921.
                      At the time said candidate was admitted, however, the regulations
                      denying the requisite status to the Chicago Medical College had not
                      been made effective, and they had been made effective by proper
                      authority before the present petitioner had submitted his application.
                          In the argument for the petitioner it is admitted that under Act
                      No. 3111, and the regulations now in force, the petitioner is
                      disqualified to take the examinations; but it is pointed out that at the
                      time he began and even when he concluded his course in the
                      Chicago Medical School, said institution was still recognized as a
                      reputable medical institution; and the question submitted is whether
                      the petitioner's case should be governed by the law and regulations
                      in force at the time of his enrollment in and graduation from the
                      Chicago Medical School, or by those in force at the time he filed his
                      application for admission, on or about September 26, 1924. It is
                      submitted for the petitioner that his case should be governed by the
                      law and regulations at the time of his graduation. To hold otherwise,
                      it is insisted, is to make the law retroactive in effect and to do
                      irreparable damage to the petitioner, who has pursued his work in
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cd897dd943e76fd90003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False          2/3
8/28/2019                                             PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 047
                       the institution referred to in good faith, believing that said school
                       had the status necessary to qualify him for examination.
                                                                                            764
                       764                  PHILIPPINE REPORTS ANNOTATED
                                      Provincial Government of Sulu vs. Rogers
                       The position taken by the petitioner is, we think, untenable. The
                       question whether a medical institution is "a reputable medical
                       school," in the sense intended by the law, is vested in the Board of
                       Medical Examiners, and although the action taken by them may
                       conceivably, in isolated cases, result in hardship, nevertheless the
                       interests of the public require that the board should be free to
                       exercise its judgment and discretion without reference to the effect
                       of the determination of the question in particular instances. There
                       can in the nature of things be no vested right in an existing law,
                       which would preclude its change or repeal. No one who has
                       commenced preparation in a particular institution has any inchoate
                       right on account of that fact. If the law were otherwise upon this
                       point, it would be impossible for the Board of Medical Examiners to
                       give effect to the knowledge which they from time to time acquire as
                       to the standing of medical schools; and an intending physician, upon
                       matriculating in a particular college, takes upon himself the risk of
                       changes that may be made in the standing of the institution by the
                       board.
                           The demurrer to the answer is not well taken. The answer is
                       therefore declared sufficient, and the petition dismissed, with costs.
                       So ordered.
                            Avanceña, C. J., Johnson, Malcolm, Villamor, Johns, and Villa-
                       Real, JJ., concur.
                           Writ denied.
                                                        __________
            © Copyright 2019 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cd897dd943e76fd90003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False          3/3