The Material Sources of International Law
The material sources of international law        can   be defined
   as the actual materials from which an international
   lawyer determines the rules applicable in a given
   situation
    The sources that   be erred in International law
                              can
    are mentioned in Article 38 paragraph 1 of the
     ICJ       statute
        The Court whose function is to decide in accordance
        with international law such disputes as are submitted
        to it shall apply
           catInternational conventions whelergeneral or particular
            establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting
               states
                International
            b                    custom as evidenceofgeneral practice
               accepted as   law
           c    the general principlesof law recognizedby civilized
              nations
          d subject to provisionsof Article 59 judicial decisions
            and the teachings of the most highly qualified
            publicists of the various nations as subsidary means
           for the determinationof the rules of law
     The general principles of law was added to provide
    additional baris should the material sources provide no
   assistanceThesegeneral principles were to be applied
                        CUSTOM
    Until recent times international law consisted mostly
   of customary rules These rules had evolved after a
    long historical process culminating in their recognition
    by the international community
    The importance of centum has gone down recently
     with the vivre are in law making treaties as well
   as the codificationof existing customs enample Vienna
    conventions of 1961 1963 and 1969
        according to some enperb curlew still has a
     role to play especially in areas that are untouched
     by treaties
     centum and usage are often med interchangeably
   However there is a technical distinction between
   them
       usage is legally unattested international habit
        curtain begins where usage ends
    Customary rules crystallisefrom mages or practices
    which have evolved in three circumstances
     a diplomaticrelations b w states
     b practiceof international
                                organs
    e state laws decisions of stale courts and state
      military or administrative practices
        The Scotia care
     in order for     a    practise to be declared as   a   custom
    it must
                 fulfill
        a Material requirements
     in order for a stale practise to be taken as custom
     there must be significant repitition The antiquity
   of the act also adds credenceto the practise
   b Psychological requirements
       this is better known as opiniojuris sire necessitates
   which means that the recurrence was the result of
   a compulsory rule
       recurrence must carry the expectation that in
    similar circumstances the same rules shall be applied
          opiniojuris is not mandatory but it helps in
        differentiating b w custom and actions that follow
       arbitary choices
            Lotus case
           West Rand CentralGoldMining Case
   The ICJ has ruled that a particularpractice between
   two states only which is acceptedby them as law
    may give rise to bindingcustomary rule inler parks
     Passage over Indian territory care
    c       Judicial application of custom
        Both national         and international courts play
        a
            key role       in application of custom
    a
         partyclaims before the court that curtenvenist
      course hurt establish whether the claim refers
     to a valid airline
      Justice Cardozo said that through its imprimatur
     the Count will attest to the     qualityof custom
                                 jural
        Paquette Habana Care     curlew applied
         Lotus Care              curtain   rejected
     entracling a curlew from documentsof statepractice
   judicial decisions and diplomatichistory is noteary
        documents are oftendefective or incomplete
        some states documentless adequately than others
        ILL statute Article 24 considerways and       means
   of making evidenceof customary international law
    were readily available
                       TREATIES
     the effect
                 of any treaty in leading to the formation
    of rules of international law depends on the kindof
    treaty it    is
    i 1 Law Making Treaties
     provisions of    law makingtreaties           are   direct sources
    of international    law
     the astonishinggrowth in the numberof law
    making treaties is due to the inadequacyof custom
    ni meeting the urgent demands of the international
    society of states
       industrial and economic developments were bringing
     states closer to one another
      international communications became more frequent
      relations btw states grew in size and complexity
     law makingtreaties            are of two kinds
     a    enunciatingrules ofuniversalinternational law eg
         UN charter
     b
         laying down general         or
                                          fairly general     rules
      some    multilateral treaties        are   to a    large extent
     either confirmatory      or    codificationof customary
    international law
 some writers criticise the term law making because
theyfeelthere treaties layout contractual obligations
   they overlook conventions and legislative instruments
 that have been adoptedby organof international insts
  an alternate name suggerled by some is normative
 treaties This name allows treaties to be capableof
 embracing the following
  a Treaties operating as general standard setting
  instruments
 b     Unratified conventions
 c     Closed or limited participationtreaties
 d Treaties formulating regional on community rules
  1Treaties creating an internationally recognisedstatus
      or
      regime
µ Instruments such as finalActs which are annened
 International Regulations
  A    large   number of parties to a treaty does not
  mean     that the treaty is binding on non parties
     non parties nuirt giveevidence of their conduct that
 shows their intention to accept such provisions as general
 rules of International Law
    North Sea Continental Shelf Cares
ailTreaty Contracts
Treaty are not direct sourcesofinternational law They
may constitute particular law btw parties and signatories
 Suchtreatieslead to the formationof international law
 in which there are three cones to be comidered
 eat A series on recurrence oftreaties laying down   a
   similar rule
                  may produce a principleof customary
  international law
  b A treaty that was originally concluded between a
  limited number of parties may be germanised by
 subsequent independent acceptance or imitation
Cc A treaty may be of considerable evidentiary value as
  to the existence   a rule which has crystallised into
                      of
   law by   an independentprocess
                                    of development
   DECISIONS OF JUDICIAL OR ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS
is International Judicial Decisions
  The  only existing permanent internationaljudicial
 tribunal is the ICJ
 Article 59 of the ICT statute states that the decisions
would not be binding except between the parties and
in respect to that particular care
   the court sees its previous decisions as guidance
 rather than as bindinglegal precedents
   SouthWest Africa cares
 The international court has shown that regards itself
free to develo international law without beingtied
down
      by prior practice and authority
    The fisheries care
CiilState Judicial Decisions
 There are two ways in which decisions of state courts
 may lead to formation of International Law
  atThe decision
                may be
                        treated as weighty precedents or
  even as binding authorities
     Lord Stowell's judgements during NapoleonicWars
     Us Supreme Courtjudgements in the Scotia
    and Paquete Habana cares
b The decision
               of state courts may in some cones
lead to thegrowth customary laws Rulesrelated
                     of
      extradition and staterecognitionfind their roots
 in decisions of state courts
Iii Decisions of international orbital tribunals
  decisions of international arbitral tribunals have
contributed to the development international law Some
                           of
landmark cones in this regard       are
  at AlabamaClaimsArbitration                 1872
  b Behning Sea Fisheries Arbitration        1893
  c   Pious Fund Care                        1902
 d NorthAtlantic FisheriesCare                1910
 some writers arguethat this is not significantcontribution
 becausearbitrators are influenced        the necessityof
                                      by
reaching a decision It is true that arbitrators are
not bound by the technicalities that bind judges However
this isn't enough to dismiss the importanceof such
tribunals in the development law
                             of
 the main distinction b w arbitration andjudicial
decisions lies in
  a manner    in which judges are selected
  b   security of tenure
  c   independenceof parties
                JURISTIC WORKS
  Juristic works are not independent sources of law
 and are referred to as subsidary means in Art 38
g   the ICJ statute
    one   opinion is that they   are
                                       only important   in
throwing light on the rules of international law
  jurists have been largely responsible for deducing
  customary rules from a coincidence
  juristicopinion    is evidenceof established customary
 rules but also of curtomary rules that are bound to
 be established
    hence it can be argued that with the passage
of time more weight will be added to the authority
of juristicopinion
  ni cares where     treaty or curtomary rule exists
                      no
juristic    opinion may be lookedupon as an
independent source
    Re PiracyJure Gentium Care
     DECISIONS OR DETERMINATIONS OF THE ORGANS OF INTERNATIONAL
     INSTITUTIONS, OR OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES
 Decisions and determinations may lead to the formation
of International law in a numberofdifferent            ways
    a They may represent intermediate art final steps in
    the evolution of customaryrules The decisive wiki and
 is the extent to which the decision has been adhere
to ni practice The legal value these Revolutions
                               of
varies according to the circumstances as well the
 voting pattern that led to their adoption
 b A revolution regarding the internal workings
                                                of an
    organisation will havefull legal effect        on members
cFor issuesthat are not covered by the organization's
Constitution resolutions may have a law makingeffect
d Sometimes organs institutions have the power to
                  of
 give binding decisions such as the Executive Boardof
 the IMF
 e Some organs of international institutions are empowered
to give decisions anddirections that have bindingeffect
on    all members
f  Determinations or opinions Communities ofJurists
                             of
created to investigate legal problem have some
                       a
weight and authority
in Peremptory principles of International Law jus cogens
 jus cogensrefers to principles from which   no   deviation
is permitted
  Article 53 g Vienna Convention Law Treatiesstates
                                    of
that jus cogens can only be modified by a subsequent
worm of international   law of the same character
 Critics of jus cogensargue that
 car it is difficult to identify norms of jus cogens There
  is also the question whether jus cogens is identified
 through multilateral treaties or if it evolves in the
  same process as customaryinternational law
 b there is a lack
                        of consensus regarding what
 classifies as jus cogens at any given time
 One    can argue that the underlying notion in jus
cogens is that its components are conditioned by the
interests    the international community as a whole
         of
  this alsoimplies that jus cogens should invalidate
usages and practices that are in conflict with
peremptory norms