Population Projection - BBS
Population Projection - BBS
Population Projection - BBS
November 2015
ISBN- 978-984-33-9960-1
Formatting:
SOMPADONA, an editing and indexing house
Email- sompadona@gmail.com
Cover design:
Buzzuuka Marketing Communications
House # 398-A, Road # 29, New DOHS
Mohakhali, Dhaka-1206
Email- info@buzzuuka.com
Published by:
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS)
Statistics and Informatics Division (SID)
Ministry of Planning
Website: www.bbs.gov.bd
Disclaimer:
This report has been prepared by Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) in collaboration with Institute
of Statistics Research and Training (ISRT), University of Dhaka.
This book or any portion thereof cannot be copied, microfilmed or reproduced for any commercial purpose. Data
therein can, however, be used and published with acknowledgement of their sources.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Population Projections of Bangladesh: A Short Review 2
1.2 Population Policy of Bangladesh 4
1.3 Objectives 4
2. METHODOLOGY 6
2.1 Inputs and Outputs of the Cohort Component Method 7
2.2 Steps of the Cohort Component Method 7
2.3 Limitations of this Projection 9
Children and
Population Bangladesh / iii
Youth inofBangladesh
Projection
4.3. Population Projection with International Migration 31
5. CONCLUSION 35
APPENDIXES
Appendix-1 Assumptions for urban-rural population projection 37
Appendix -2 Assumptions for district-wise population projection 38
Appendix -3 Age-specific Male-Female Distribution Pyramids 39
Appendix -4 Baseline and projected population by three scenarios, 5-year age-group and sex, 42
Bangladesh
Appendix -5 Baseline and projected population for medium variant, single age and sex, 48
Bangladesh
Appendix -6 Baseline and projected population for medium variant, single year-single age, 59
females, Bangladesh
Appendix -7 Baseline and projected population for medium variant, single year-single age, 63
males, Bangladesh
Appendix -8 Baseline and projected total population for medium variant, single year-single 67
age, Bangladesh
Appendix -9 TFR series of SAARC countries 71
Appendix -10 References 72
List of Tables
Table 3.1: Assumptions on TFR and life expectancy at birth and UNFPA Population Projection 11
(2014)
Table 3.2: Assumptions regarding TFR and population projection in El-Saharty et al. (2014) 12
Children and
Population Youth in
Projection Bangladesh / iv
ofBangladesh
Table 4.10a: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Barisal division
(in thousands): Scenario II 25
Table 4.10b: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Chittagong
division (in thousands): Scenario II 26
Table 4.10c: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Khulna division
(in thousands): Scenario II 26
Table 4.10d: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Dhaka division
(in thousands): Scenario II 27
Table 4.10e: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Rajshahi
division (in thousands): Scenario II 27
Table 4.10f: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Sylhet division
(in thousands): Scenario II 28
Table 4.10g: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Rangpur
division (in thousands): Scenario II 28
Table 4.11: Baseline and projected labor force (in percentage of total population) and
dependency ratio by three scenarios, Bangladesh 28
Table 4.12: Projected Female Population Aged 15-49 Years (mothers accounted for TFR) in
Three Scenarios (in thousands) 29
Table 4.13: Projected school enrollment (6-11 years old in thousands) in three scenarios 30
Table 4.14: Estimated net migration rate and number of net migrants by age-group by sex (per
100,000) 32
Table 4.15: Baseline and projected total population by 5-year age-group including international
migration, Bangladesh (in thousands), Scenario II 33
Table 4.16: Baseline and projected total population by 5-year age-group, Bangladesh 2050-51
(in millions) 33
List of Figures
Figure 1: Comparative survival ratio of UN South Asia and UN general life tables 19
Figure 2: Projected female population aged 15-49 years (mothers accounted for TFR) in three 29
scenarios (in 100,000)
Figure 3: Projected primary school enrollment (6-11 years old in millions) in three scenarios 30
Figure 4: Projected youth population (15-29 years of age) in three scenarios (in 100,000) 31
Children and
Population Youth in
Projection Bangladesh / v
of Bangladesh
Children and
Population Youth in
Projection Bangladesh / vi
ofBangladesh
Minister
Ministry of Planning
Government of the People's Republic of
Bangladesh
Message
I am delighted to know that Population and Housing Census 2011 Project of Bangladesh Bureau of
Statistics (BBS), Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) has prepared fourteen Population
Monographs using the census data of different years. This is the first time BBS is publishing
population monographs with in-depth analysis of the population census data. The present report on
‘Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends' is a special monograph in addition to
fourteen population monographs.
Each monograph deals in a particular issue related to population and housing where census data
have been used in multidimensional approaches. In addition, cross country comparison and in country
comparison have also been made to oversee the representativeness of data with other national
sources. It is expected that the monographs will useful in national planning and policy making
particularly in the field of population and development.
I would like to thank concerned officials of SID and BBS and also authors of the monographs for their
relentless effort in preparing these monographs and publication thereof. Special thanks to European
Union (EU) and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for their generous support in conducting 5th
decennial census of Bangladesh and preparing the population monographs.
vii
viii
State Minister
Ministry of Finance
and
Ministry of Planning
Government of the People's Republic of
Bangladesh
Message
I have come to learn that Population and Housing Census 2011 Project of Bangladesh Bureau of
Statistics, Statistics and Informatics Division has prepared fourteen Population Monographs and one
special monograph on ‘Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends’ using census
data of different years. Population is the main ingredient for national planning and policy making.
Therefore, Population Monographs are of vital importance in the field of population planning of the
country.
Each monograph has been prepared with a particular issue related to population and housing. To
prepare these Monographs census data have been used widely in multidimensional way where
secondary data from other sources have also been used. The monographs are a new dimension in
the wide use of data generated through national censuses of the country.
My sincere thanks and gratitude to the honorable Minister, Ministry of Planning for his dynamic
leadership and active guidance in implementing all our activities including census undertaking. I would
like to thank Secretary, Statistics and Informatics Division, Director General, BBS for their relentless
effort in preparing these monographs and publication thereof. Special thanks to European Union (EU)
and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for their generous support in conducting 5th decennial
census of Bangladesh and preparing the population monographs.
ix
x
Secretary
Statistics and Informatics Division (SID)
Ministry of Planning
Government of the People’s Republic of
Bangladesh
Foreword
Population Census is the single most important statistical undertaking in any country. Bangladesh
Bureau of Statistics of the Statistics and Informatics Division has conducted the 5th decennial census
of the country during 15-19 March, 2011. In order to supplement the main census a large scale
sample survey was conducted in October 2011 which covered detailed information on Population &
Housing. The report on ‘Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends’ is special
Monograph in addition Monograph is mainly based on the findings of main census and sample census
conducted during 2011. Data from other secondary sources have also been used to prepare the
Monograph.
It may be mentioned that Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) has been publishing a number of
Population Monograph series and Population Monograph on ‘Population Projection of Bangladesh:
Dynamics and Trends' is a special monograph in addition to fourteen monographs being published by
BBS using Population Census Data. Monographs are the in depth analysis of a particular topic of
interest. Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends has highlighted the future
population of Bangladesh under different assumptions.
‘Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends’ will be useful for proper planning of the
country considering the future trends of population. This monograph has forecasted future population
of the country by age-sex and residence under different assumptions.
I like to express my sincere thanks to Director General, Deputy Director General of BBS, Project
Director of Population and Housings Census 2011 Project and his team for preparing this Monograph.
I acknowledge with gratitude the support of European Union (EU) and United Nations Population Fund
(UNFPA) for successful completion of the Population and Housing Census 2011 and preparing the
Monograph.
xi
xii
Director General
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS)
Statistics and Informatics Division (SID)
Ministry of Planning
Government of the People’s Republic of
Bangladesh
Preface
The fifth population and housing census of Bangladesh was conducted during 15th March to 19th
March, 2011. The main objective of the census was to collect information on the basic characteristics
related to housing, households and population for developing a comprehensive database for
development planning and human resource development programmes as well as economic
management.
Population and Housing Census 2011 were conducted in three phases. In the First Phase, basic data
about all households and individual members of the households were collected through ICR formatted
questionnaire during 15th March to 19th March, 2011. In the Second Phase, quality and coverage of
the main count were verified through a Post Enumeration Check (PEC) survey during 10th April to 14th
April, 2011. For the first time in the census history of Bangladesh, PEC was conducted by an
independent organization, namely Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS). In the Third
Phase, detailed socio-economic information was collected by administering a long machine readable
questionnaire in a sample survey held during 15th October to 25th October, 2011.
One of the objectives of the Population and Housing Census 2011 Project was in-depth analysis of
census data and preparation of Population Monograph series. Monographs are useful to the users to
know the detailed information about the related area for taking appropriate policy measures and
further research.
I express my heartfelt gratitude to the Honorable Minister for Planning for his effective guidance and
significant cooperation in making the census a success. I express my deepest gratitude to Secretary,
Statistics and Informatics Division (SID) for her whole-hearted support and cooperation to the census.
Moreover, members of ‘Steering Committee’, ‘Standing Technical Committee’, Consultants and the
participants of the Seminar-cum-Expert Consultation deserve special thanks for their valuable
contributions for finalizing the questionnaire and the census programme. I am thankful to the
researchers of Institute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT) for preparing this special
monograph. Thanks to European Union (EU) and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for their
technical and financial support to the Population and Housing Census 2011 Project.
Finally, I like to thank Deputy Director General, BBS, Project Director, Population and Housing Census
2011 Project, members of the Technical Committee and other officers & staff members of BBS for
bringing out this monograph.
xiii
xiv
Message
This report entitled ‘Population Projection: Dynamics and Trends’ is a special monograph in addition
to 14 monograph series developed by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS) with support from
the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). UNFPA has supported the BBS since the very first
census in 1974, a cooperation that has grown stronger with each census. Through the “Support to
2011 Bangladesh Population and Housing Census” project UNFPA has been working closely with the
BBS to ensure that best use is made out of the resources invested in the census. The project has put
a major emphasis on in-depth analysis of census data and the production of thematic reports in the
form of these monographs. This series will provide its readers a better and clearer understanding of
the trends, the current country scenarios and the gaps indicating where targeted interventions are
necessary.
The availability of quality, reliable and timely data, as well as a thorough, methodologically sound and
user-friendly analysis of data is more important than ever before. The information generated by
population and housing census, the numbers of people, their distribution, their living conditions, are all
critical for development. Without accurate data, policymakers do not know where to invest in schools,
hospitals or roads and the most in need remain invisible. The implementation and monitoring of the
Sustainable Development Goals, the guiding framework for the development agenda 2030, will
require the production and analysis of a large amount of data, big data, requiring strong and
independent National Statistics Offices, which UNFPA will continue to support.
I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate and thank the Statistics and Informatics Division
and the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics’ authority and the project team for their efforts to produce this
series, as well as the experts who contributed to the development of the monographs. My special
gratitude goes to the Delegation of European Union in Bangladesh for their generous support and co-
operation in implementing the “Support to Bangladesh Population and Housing Census 2011” project
and in the preparation of these monographs.
xv
xvi
Project Director
Population and Housing Census 2011 Project
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
Statistics and Informatics Division
Ministry of Planning
Acknowledgements
It is my great pleasure to acknowledge the contributors who were engaged in preparing the special
Monograph on ‘Population Projection of Bangladesh: Dynamics and Trends’ under Population and
Housing Census 2011 Project of Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). This initiative of BBS is a new
dimension with regard to the wide use of census data in the country and the abroad.
This special monograph has been prepared by the BBS in collaboration with Institute of Statistical
Research and Training (ISRT), Dhaka University. A series of review meetings were organized to
finalize the draft monograph.
I would like to express my profound regards and deep sense of gratitude to the Secretary, Statistics
and Informatics Division and Director General, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics for their valuable
suggestions, continuous guidance and all out support in smooth completion of all the activities of this
project and bringing out this special monograph.
It is worth mentioning that European Union (EU) has provided generous support in the implementation
of the Population and Housing Census 2011 Project. I take this opportunity to express my
indebtedness to United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for the partnership of this project of BBS.
I am extremely grateful to the Institute of Statistical Research and Training (ISRT) and the authors who
were engaged in preparing this special monograph. My sincere thanks to Mr. Md. Shamsul Alam,
local consultant of this project and Dr. Sadananda Mitra, ex-consultant, UNDP for their whole hearted
co-operation in the preparation of this special monograph.
Thanks are also due to Mr. Iori Kato, Deputy Representative, Dr. Shantana R. Halder, Chief PPR and
Mr. Mahboob-E-Alam, NPO, UNFPA for their kind support and help. I am grateful to Mr. Md. Mostafa
Ashrafuzzaman, Deputy Director, Mr. Md. Khorshed Alam, Assistant Statistical Officer, Mr.
Mohammad Abdullah, Assistant Statistical Officer and all other officials of Population and Housing
Census 2011 project of BBS who worked hard to conduct the census and to prepare this special
monograph.
xvii
xviii
Executive Summary
This study aims to analyze the population trends and impact to provide options for policy
makers in Bangladesh. In the last few years Bangladesh is possessing remarkable GDP
growth including increased life expectancy and levels of literacy, and an improvement over
the maternal and child mortality rates, immunization or vaccination program and even a
drastic reduction of poverty rate. Population dynamics is now one of the important factors of
this country’s development, planning and success, and projection is one important tool.
The population of Bangladesh has been increased rapidly since its independence. This large
increase in Bangladesh’s population, notably from the late 20th century, is mainly due to the
improvement of literacy rate, reduction of gender disparity, declination of maternal and child
mortality rates, better medical technology and immense public health campaigns. This study
adopts three realistic scenarios (Scenarios I, II and III) comparing with the trends of various
countries, and their socio-economic and demographic components based on the adjusted 2011
census population and age-sex distribution. Scenarios I, II and III could be labeled as high,
medium and low variant accordingly. Here the keen interest is on the policy makers’ choices
in attaining and implanting different sets of intervention. It is to be recommended that the
scenario II is more feasible, whereas scenario III could be preferred for policy
implication. In every three different scenarios (I, II and III) has an increased population. In
2061, the population of Bangladesh is estimated to be 251.45 million under high variant
fertility assumption (scenario I), 223.39 million under medium variant fertility assumption
(scenario II) and 209.42 million under low variant fertility assumption (scenario III). In high
variant (scenario I) about 68 percent of population is shown to be increased, ranges from 149
to 251 million. The total population will remain in the range of 209 to 224 millions in 2061 in
scenarios II and III. The age structure of projected population shows a curvature pattern for
all age groups, there are ups and downs in total numbers and proportion changes. A sharp
increase of urbanization has been depicted in all three scenarios. The age-specific projected
values show that at the age of 30-34 and onwards, population increases sharply. This
indicates movement of the population towards the older age groups. An interesting output of
this study is the population projection considering international migration, according to
scenario II the total population is going to be 219.70 million. For a country like Bangladesh
the net migration rates at middle ages are always negative, more people leave the country for
work and education than the number that comes in. This fact is also reflected in the estimated
net migration rates.
xix
xx
1. INTRODUCTION
1. Introduction
In this age of globalization, Bangladesh has achieved significant progress in many areas of
human development and economic growth. Since last few years Bangladesh is possessing
over 6 percent GDP growth including increased life expectancy and levels of literacy, and an
improvement over the maternal and child mortality rates, immunization or vaccination
program and even drastic reduction of poverty rate at 24.8% (MDG 2015). This country has
been improved its Gross National Income per capita (GNI) and positioned as one of the
lower-middle income countries (World Bank 2015). About 30 percent of the total population
in Bangladesh is comprised within the youth ages between 10 years to 24 years (UNFPA
2014b). Population dynamics is now one of the striving factors of this country to peep on and
projection is one important tool.
The history of population projection is old. The earliest systematic global population
projection dates to Notestein (1945). Since the 1950s, the United Nations has taken a
leadership role in the population projections and dissemination of their results. Nowadays
most national governments make population projections for their own countries. Campbell
(1996) projected U.S. population from 1995 to 2025 by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin.
Colby and Ortman (2014) projected U.S. population from 2014 to 2060. In addition, a few
international organizations prepare population projections for the world, regions, and
individual countries. The United Nations (UN) and the U.S. Census Bureau issue revised
global and national projections on a regular basis. The UN (2014) published projected
population from 2010 to 2100 for a total of 233 countries and areas. The UN projections are
the most widely used worldwide. Many national governments, international agencies, the
media, researchers, and academic institutions rely on UN projections. The World Bank and
the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) also prepare population
projections for the world, major regions, and (especially the World Bank) for individual
countries. World Bank projections generally are used for planning and for managing projects,
while IIASA projections have been used primarily to assess various projection assumptions
and methods. Each of these international organizations uses slightly different projection
methodologies, makes varying assumptions about future demographic trends, and begins with
slightly different estimates of population size.
Population projections can be used for a number of purposes. They provide a tool for
analysing the components of growth and the sensitivity of underlying assumptions.
Projections can raise our understanding of the determinants of population change. Projections
also can be used to provide information on possible future scenarios. The most important use
of population projections is in the role they can play as a rational basis for decision making.
Changes in population size and composition have many social, economic, environmental, and
political implications; for this reason, population projections often serve as a basis for
National population projections, for example, can be used to plan for future Social Security
and Medicare obligations (Lee and Tuljapurkar, 1997; Miller, 2001). State projections can be
used to determine future water demands (Texas Water Development Board, 1997) and need
for welfare expenditures (Opitz and Nelson, 1996). Local projections can be used to
determine the need for new public schools (Swanson et al., 1998) and to select sites for fire
stations (Tayman et al. 1994). Business enterprises use forecasts to predict demands for their
products (Thomas, 1994) and to anticipate the health care costs of current and retired
employees (Kintner and Swanson, 1994). Population projections can be used to forecast the
demand for housing (Mason, 1996), the number of people with disabilities (Michaud et al.
1996), and the number of sentenced criminals (Oregon Office of Economic Analysis, 2000).
Population projections take advantage of the two strong points of demography: (i) the
accurate recording of demographic processes over a period of years and (ii) the momentum
that links demographic processes for one time period with those for another. Because the
future is intimately tied to the past, projections based on past trends and relationships raise
our understanding of the dynamics of population growth, and often serve as forecasts of
population change that are sufficiently accurate to support good decision making. The diverse
and increasingly influential roles played by population projections make them an important
part of modern demographic analysis.
A small number of studies have been attempted population projection for Bangladesh over
the past decades. Recently UNFPA (2014a) conducted population projection of Bangladesh
using the 2011 census population as the base for the period from 2016 to 2061. Three
alternative assumptions about trends in fertility are considered in UNFPA (2014a) projection:
TFR unchanged at 2.3 over the entire projection period, TFR declining to 1.9 by 2016-21 and
remaining at that level thereafter, and TFR declining to 1.6 by 2016-21 and remaining at that
level thereafter. In this study gradual increase in expectation of life is assumed for both male
and female, and net international migration is assumed to be zero. The lowest figure for the
2061 population is 201 million in the low projection and about 265 million in the high
projection have been figured out. UNFPA (2014a) projection was based on the cohort-
component method which was carried out by the user friendly DemProj (Stover and
Kirmeyer 2005) computer program. Another study on Bangladesh population projection was
conducted by Uddin (2014) that also considered the recent population census 2011 by as the
base population to estimate the target population for the forecasting period. The BDHS and
SVRS data sources were used to retrieve the necessary inputs. Author assumed an under
enumeration of 15-19 years age groups in 2011 population census and a comparative
simulation was formulated with age structure of the contemporary BDHS (2011) and census
El-Saharty et al. (2014) estimated the population of Bangladesh is to be 218.1 million under a
Laissez-Faire fertility assumption (LF scenario) and 201.3 million under an accelerated
fertility transition (AFT) scenario in 2051. The authors considered two scenarios. LF scenario
assumes that TFR drops to 2.0 by 2016 and remains there until 2051. On the other hand, AFT
assumes that TFR reduces to 1.7 by 2016 and remains there until 2051. Mahsin and Hossain
(2012) used Bayesian approach for population projection, and also investigated the usefulness
of cohort component method in making the population projection for Bangladesh. Firstly,
they made fertility forecasting based on Bayesian fertility model. Under this approach they
followed the time-series tradition in developing a method to forecast TFR and then convert it
to the age-specific fertility rates on the basis of base-year age-specific fertility rates.
Secondly, they made forecasting for the life expectancies and then for age specific survival
probabilities. Finally, they followed the cohort method to forecast the population. Haque et
al. (2012) made a population projection based on logistic population model and non-linear
model that incorporated the growth rate as a function of time. Firstly, they tested the
numerical method for Bangladesh population data (1991-2006) and then they found a fitted
population projection. Finally, they implemented the logistic model that gave future
population projection for Bangladesh during 1996 to 2035. BBS (2006) prepared a population
projection based on the 2001 Population Census. According to their study the projected
population would be 218 million in 2050 if replacement level fertility (NRR=1) could be
attained in 2011. Islam (2000) envisaged the population momentum in Bangladesh for the
period 1991-2051. Assuming the CPR would increase to 63 percent in the year 2006 and
remain so till 2051, the medium variant projected population was 188.1 million in the year
2051. Using data from UN World Population Prospects (1990), Biswas and Paul (1996)
projected Bangladesh’s population, with the assumptions of TFR to be 2.7 children per
woman by 2020 from 5.1 in 1990. The medium variant projected population figured as 212
million in the year 2020 from the base population of 115.6 million in 1990. Kabir and
Chowdhury (1982) investigated the relationship between population growth and food
production in Bangladesh. Recognizing the difficulties of feeding the growing population
even with considerable increase in food production, they suggested giving priority to
population policy for reduction in population. Rabbani and Hossain (1981) projected the
population of Bangladesh for the period 1975-2025 using the cohort-component method with
the assumption of no migration. The medium variant (NRR=1 during the period 1995-2000)
projected population in 2025 would be 178 million. Obaidullah (1976) presented a model
termed as ‘Expo-linear Model’ which is claimed better than either an exponential or a linear
model in describing population growth over time. But he agreed that there was a difficulty in
his model in interpreting its parameter unlike those of exponential or linear one. Revelle et al.
(1973) have made the population projection of Bangladesh for the period 1972 to 2003, based
1.3 Objectives
Development of any country may depend on the size of its population. As Bangladesh has a
large population, to plan about any future development, consequently we need to know the
size of the population on that time, i.e. projected population. The population of a geographic
area grows or declines through the interaction of three main factors: fertility, mortality, and
migration. To project population size at a future date, demographers make assumptions about
levels of fertility and mortality, and about how many people will move (migration) in or out
of an area before that date. The net population increase or decrease over the period is added
to the ‘baseline’ (beginning) population to project future population. The population
projection is the best guess calculation of the number of people expected to be alive at a
future date, based on assumptions about the base population size, births, deaths and
migration. The population projections are always set on a conditional future because we can
never be certain about the assumptions considered in the projection. Accurate baseline data
on population size and age structure, as well as on predicted fertility, mortality, and net
migration rates, are critical to produce accurate population projections (Keilman, 1998). Few
specific objectives below are reaped in accordance with the BPP (Bangladesh Population
Policy) 2012.
To make projection of the future size of the population at national and district level.
To make population projection of urban rural (residential level) composition to insight
into future needs of different local government facilities.
To make further projection considering the age and sex composition of population of
Bangladesh.
To explain broadly how population projections can be useful decision-making tools.
The cohort component summary equation is defined for the population at time (t+n) as
Pt+n=S[t,t+n]+B[t,t+n]+NM[t,t+n], (2.1)
where S[t,t+n] is the survived population at time t+n, B[t,t+n] is the number of births
observed in the period [t,t+n] and NM[t,t+n] is the net migration observed in the period
[t,t+n].
To project the total population size, and the number of males and females by 5-year age
groups, this study found the number of people who survive or are expected to be alive in the
future. Then the survived population number, the number of births that took place and the
number of net migrants are added.
We expect to get a number of outputs from a population projection using cohort component
method: age and sex structure of the population; population aggregates: population size,
population in selected broad age groups, mid-interval population size, number of person-
years lived, population growth, births, deaths, net change due to migration, indicators of the
population structure: proportions by broad age groups, dependency ratios, median age of the
population, proportion of women in childbearing ages, sex ratio of the population; indicators
of the population distribution (national; if urban and rural populations are being projected):
proportion urban, proportion rural; rates of population change: crude birth rate, crude death
rate, rate of natural increase, crude net migration rates, rate of population growth.
The cohort component method consists of a number of steps, which are described below.
Step 1: Collecting Information
The cohort component method requires information from both the most recent and the prior
census of the locale. Information on the number of births during the past 10 years is also
required. Ideally information on births is compiled by the age of the mother, so that age-
specific fertility rates can be calculated. These rates are used to project the number of births
that occur during the projection period. This study uses the total fertility rates and
proportionate distribution of births among women at different childbearing age groups to find
the age-specific fertility rates. A life table or calculated survival rates are also needed to
calculate the mortality rates in the projected years.
Step 2: Aging a Population into the Future
The cohort component method takes each age group of the population and updates it over the
time using the assumed survival rates (Siegel and Swanson 2004). More specifically, for a
specific age group the population at time (t+n) is obtained by multiplying the population at
time t with n-year survival rates.
Step 3: Adding Births
Next the number of births taking place during the projection interval is calculated. Age-
specific fertility rates are multiplied by the number of women in their reproductive age
groups to obtain the annual number of expected births for each age group per year. They are
The number of births observed during the interval of length n can be calculated using age
specific fertility rates and the mid-year female population of the childbearing span a as
Bn =n ×a=15‐1945‐49ASFR(a) ×MWPOP(a),
where MWPOP(a) is the mid-year female population for age group a. The total numbers of
male and female births are obtained by multiplying Bn by the corresponding sex ratio at birth.
Calculating Mortality Rates using Life Tables
Usually survival rates are derived from model life tables based upon levels of expectation of
life. At first the current survival rates obtained from the life table of a country are compared
to the survival rates of different model life tables for the same level of life expectancy. Then
the life table that shows the best match is used to derive survival rates for different projection
years.
Let x denote the age, 5Lx denote life table number of persons between ages (x, x+5) at time t,
5Lx5Lx‐5 survival ratio from age group (x-5, x) to age group (x, x+5). Life table number of
persons between ages (x, x+5) is given by the following formula:
Px, x+5t+5=Px‐5, xt×5Lx5Lx‐5.
The open interval of the age group requires special treatment. According to Keyfitz’s method,
the population in the open interval at time (t+5) is given by,
Pw+t+5=5Pw‐5t×5Lw5Lw‐5+Pw+t×T(w+5)Tw,
where w+ refers to the oldest age group. In stationary population this population is given by,
Pw+t+5=5Pw‐5t×Tw5Lw‐5,
Migrations are movements across political boundaries that are semi-permanent or permanent
in nature. The calculation of the number of net migrants consists of two stages, first
estimating the net migration rate and then obtaining the migration adjusted population total. It
is recommended to use net migration rate from reliable sources, if possible, otherwise indirect
methods can be used to estimate net migration rate. Two methods of indirect estimation of the
number of net migrants will be reviewed in this section, where both the methods rely on
survival rates and census information.
Net migration rate (NMR) can be defined as the number of in-migrants minus the number of
out-migrants divided by the population exposed to the possibility (or risk) of migration, as
shown in equation (2.2).
NMR=I‐EP×100, (2.2)
where NMR is the net migration rate, I is the immigrants, E is the emigrants and P is the
population.
There are two methods for estimating net migration, which are direct and indirect methods.
Direct method uses either continuous registration system or census information; whereas the
indirect method can be implemented either by vital statistics or by survival ratio method.
There are two approaches to implement direct method that include continuous registration
system, where individuals report their change in residence immediately to a local government
office, and the use of census information (e.g. a census question like "Where were you living
5 years ago"? can give information on whether a person migrated or not). Indirect method can
be implemented based on the population counts in different age groups from the two most
recent consecutive censuses. Detail on these two methods of estimating net migration can be
found from Siegel and Swanson 2004.
The cohort component population projection method follows the process of demographic
change and is viewed as a more reliable projection method than those that primarily rely on
census data or information that reflects population change. It also provides the type of
information needed to plan for services to meet the future demands of different segments of
the population. However, like most projection tools, there are disadvantages to using the
cohort component method. First, it is highly dependent on reliable birth, death and migration
data. Thus, it may be difficult to collect the information to apply this tool. Second, it assumes
that survival and birth rates and estimates of net migration will remain the same throughout
This section attempts to cover the assumptions that were implemented in different
projections.
Table 3.1: Assumptions on TFR and life expectancy at birth and UNFPA Population Projection (2014)
In this projection, mortality assumptions are based on the expected future trends in life
expectancy, which is assumed to increase approximately 0.25 years per year over the
projection periods. The age-specific mortality is assumed to follow United Nations general
model life table. The net migration is assumed to be zero. The cohort-component method is
employed and the projection is carried out by using Demographic Projection, popularly
Table 3.2: Assumptions regarding TFR and population projection in El-Saharty et al. (2014)
3.4 Projection by UN
The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United
Nations Secretariat produces projections covering all countries of the world. These
projections are routinely published in the World Population Prospects series. The World
Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision is one such latest series and covers a 150 year time
The fertility assumptions that are made include high, medium, low, constant and instant-
replacement-fertility. A probabilistic method for projecting total fertility rate has been used in
the 2012 Revision. This new method was developed in collaboration with the Probabilistic
Projections Group of the Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences (CSSS) of the
University of Washington. The method is based on empirical fertility trends estimated for all
countries of the world for the period 1950 to 2010. The projected values are used in the
medium fertility assumption.
Under the high variant, fertility is projected to remain 0.5 children above the fertility in the
medium variant over most of the projection period. By 2020-2025, fertility in the high variant
is therefore half a child higher than that of the medium variant. That is, countries reaching a
total fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman in the medium variant have a total fertility rate of
2.6 children per woman in the high variant. Under the low variant, fertility is projected to
remain 0.5 children below the fertility in the medium variant over most of the projection
period. By 2020-2025, fertility in the low variant is therefore half a child lower than that of
the medium variant. That is, countries reaching a total fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman
in the medium variant have a total fertility rate of 1.6 children per woman in the low variant.
As the name implies, under the constant-fertility variant, fertility in all countries remains
constant at the level estimated for 2005-2010. For each country, fertility is set to the level
necessary to ensure a net reproduction rate of 1 starting in 2010-2015. Fertility varies over the
remainder of the projection period in such a way that the net reproduction rate always
remains equal to one thus ensuring, over the long-run, the replacement of the population.
Assumptions regarding mortality are made in terms of life expectancy at birth by sex.
Mortality is assumed to be either normal or constant. Under the normality assumption, life
expectancy is generally assumed to rise over the projection period for most countries. The
2012 Revision of the World Population Prospects uses new probabilistic methods for
projecting life expectancy at birth. Under the constant mortality assumption, mortality over
the projection period is maintained constant for each country at the level estimated for 2005-
2010. The impact of HIV/AIDS on mortality is also considered as a variant. For the countries
which have experienced prevalence rates of five per cent or more, a different approach for the
estimation and projection of mortality was used.
The international migration is assumed as either normal or zero. Under the normal migration
assumption, the future path of international migration is set on the basis of past international
migration estimates and consideration of the policy stance of each country with regard to
future international migration flows. Projected levels of net migration are generally kept
The world population follows nearly one percent growth rate for a long time with the ups and
downs of its various components. Since the late 18 century, the population seems to increase
th
with the sharp decline in mortality and rapid increase in the size of women population at
childbearing ages (Islam 2000). The population replacement level reaches when the number
of women at reproductive ages is replaced by the same number of daughters, assuming a
stationary population where birth and death rates remain constant, and moreover population
age composition remains unchanged over time. In real world, due to rapid growth of young
age composition, the population increases with a great pace.
Bangladesh has been going through a crucial demographic transition, keeping its third
generation after the liberation war in 1971. It is expected that during next decades it would
possibly attain the replacement level with its stagnant fertility rates around 2.3 and a sharp
decline in mortality rates. However, a short term population projection (5-10 years) of
Bangladesh may not be disrupted from any dramatic policy changes, and could be illustrated
from its past trend with the help of underlying assumptions. But a long term (about 50 years)
population projection can be deviated from a small shift of policies and socio-economic
factors. Again Bangladesh may face different patterns of age at marriage and childbearing
stage. Though age-specific fertility rate is still high in the age group of 20-24 (BDHS 2011,
2014) but it could turn into the older ages due to women empowerment and increasing
literacy rate (Islam 2000; Stover and Kirmeyer 2005;).
The most important assumption for any population projection is the assumption on the pattern
of future age-specific fertility. Age-specific fertility can be obtained from the summary
fertility measures like total fertility rate (TFR) and proportionate age-specific fertility
(proportion of births by females of different age groups). The projection is based on the
assumptions on both TFR and proportionate age-specific fertility for entire projection period.
The TFR and proportionate age-specific fertility values have been considered here after a
series of discussion and consultation meetings with the renowned demographers and policy
makers in Bangladesh, organized by BBS and UNFPA. Based on the assumed TFR values,
three scenarios, namely Scenario I, II, and III, are adopted in this study that are described
below.
Scenario II: A steady decline of TFR employs in the medium variant fertility level. Initiating
from 2.3 in 2011, it assumes to be dropped to 2.1 in 2021, from 2026 TFR is assumed to be
1.9 and continued thereafter.
Scenario III: A sharp decline of TFR is assumed in the low variant scenario, beginning with
TFR 2.3 in 2011, 2.1 in 2021, 1.9 (below replacement level) in 2026 and after two decades
from 2011 it is assumed to be 1.6 and remains constant till 2061.
Scenarios I, II and III could be labeled as high, medium and low variant fertility, respectively
(see Table 4.1 for the assumed TFR values for different years). Here the keen interest is on
the policy makers’ choices in attaining and implanting different sets of intervention. It is to be
recommended that the scenario II is more feasible, whereas scenario III could be preferred for
policy implication. High variant (scenario I) assumes the highest fertility level, whereas the
low variant (scenario III) possesses the lowest fertility level. The population projections are
delineated for the period 2016 to 2061 based on the adjusted census population 2011. In this
report, projections are made with and without considering net migration.
We have assumed different proportionate fertility rate (PFR) by age groups for the
years 2011-31, 2031-51, and 2051-61 (Table 4.2). Table 4.2 shows that due to decreasing
TFR, the proportions of mothers in the younger age groups decline as time grows. But
due to the current heavy tailed distribution of younger mothers, the middle age groups
observe an increase in the proportions with time. Using the assumed TFR (Table 4.1) and
proportionate age-specific fertility, age-specific fertility rates are obtained (using Equation
2.2) for different years of projected period, which are shown in Table 4.2 for three different
scenarios. Note that the same proportionate age-specific fertility is assumed for all three
scenarios.
Life expectancy (for both males and females) is another important factor of population
projection, which helps to obtain survival probability of different age groups from the
selected life table. In recent years, life expectancy is getting high in Bangladesh,
asymptotically a developing country like Bangladesh may experience a 0.25 years of longer
lifespan in each year with all its socio-economic development and improvement of healthcare
facilities (UNFPA 2014a). This study assumes an increased life expectancy from the year
2011 to 2061 for all three scenarios (Table 4.1).
Life table plays an important role in population projection because it brings the age-specific
mortality pattern in the calculation. To select the most appropriate life table for obtaining
age-specific mortality rates for the entire projected period, the current life table of SVRS
2011 is compared with several available model life tables. Among the available model life
tables, the Coale-Demeny and West model life tables were based on European mortality
experience. Later UN developed some model life tables for developing countries. Since
Bangladesh is a South Asian country, the SVRS 2011 life table is analytically compared with
both the UN South Asian and UN General model life table. It is found that although very
similar, but UN General model life table shows a much closer fit to the SVRS 2011 life table
(Figure 1). The standardized sum of squared deviations measures also show a slight
improvement from UN General model life table (UNG) over the UN south Asian model life
table (UNSA).
Table 4.3 shows projected population for three scenarios corresponding to different assumed
TFRs and life expectancy values. It shows that population has increased over the projection
duration in all three scenarios. In high variant (scenario I) about 68 percent of population is
shown to be increased, ranges from 149,764 to 251,450 thousands. The total population will
remain in the range of 209,415 to 223,390 thousands in 2061 in scenarios III and II
accordingly. Only the scenario I meets the population size assumed by Bongaarts (1996),
which is 239 millions in 2050. TFR is assumed to be constant at 2.3 for entire projection
period under scenario I. Total projected population is about 42,035 thousands higher in
scenario I than that of scenario III. However, the increasing pattern of projected population
shows a diminishing rate from the year 2041 in scenarios II and III. Nonetheless all three
scenarios figured out an alarming large population after five decades, which could create new
challenges for current infrastructure and future development of Bangladesh.
Table 4.3: Baseline and projected total population for different assumption on TFR and life expectancy,
Bangladesh (in thousands)
Year Assumed TFR Projected Life Expectancy Projected Total Population
(in thousands)
Scenario I Scenario II Scenario III Male Female Scenario Scenario Scenario
I II III
2011 2.3 2.3 2.3 67 68 149764 149764 149764
2016 2.3 2.3 2.3 68 69 160221 160221 160221
2021 2.3 2.1 2.1 69 70 171684 171684 171684
2026 2.3 1.9 1.9 70 72 183593 182096 182096
2031 2.3 1.9 1.6 71 73 195176 190735 190735
2036 2.3 1.9 1.6 73 74 205793 198503 196299
2041 2.3 1.9 1.6 74 75 215899 205638 201314
2046 2.3 1.9 1.6 75 76 225386 211663 205255
2051 2.3 1.9 1.6 77 78 234382 216465 207869
2056 2.3 1.9 1.6 78 79 243287 220559 209466
2061 2.3 1.9 1.6 79 80 251450 223390 209415
We have divided the age groups into four categories, namely, 0-14, 15-59, 60-64, 65+. The
labor force is defined by age group 15-59 which is very important for measuring a country’s
workforce. Table 4.4 states that labor force participation is quite high in all three scenarios
over the projected years. In 2061, the projected labor force seems to be near about the total
population of 2011. The age structure of projected population shows a curvature pattern for
all age groups, there are ups and downs in total numbers and proportion changes. Under-15
Table 4.4: Baseline and projected population by three scenarios for selected age-groups, Bangladesh
(in thousands)
Year Scenario I Scenario II Scenario III
2011 51868 86708 4089 7100 51868 86708 4089 7100 51868 86708 4089 7100
2016 48986 99417 3374 8443 48986 99417 3374 8443 48986 99417 3374 8443
2021 45817 111711 5129 9028 45817 111711 5129 9028 45817 111711 5129 9028
2026 47453 119378 5776 10985 45957 119378 5776 10985 45957 119378 5776 10985
2031 49550 124930 7439 13256 45109 124930 7439 13256 45109 124930 7439 13256
2036 50232 130408 8621 16531 42942 130408 8621 16531 40739 130408 8621 16531
2041 49984 135975 9520 20418 41166 134531 9520 20418 36843 134531 9520 20418
2046 49965 138776 12316 24330 40582 134436 12316 24330 34174 134436 12316 24330
2051 50588 141495 12251 30045 39863 134304 12251 30045 33411 132160 12251 30045
2056 51613 144660 11953 35060 39045 134502 11953 35060 32214 130240 11953 35060
2061 52574 144428 15623 38824 38121 130821 15623 38824 30494 124475 15623 38824
Male-female ratio is about fifty-fifty in Bangladesh population, this seems to be a plateau for
decades. Yearly male-female ratio may not depict any significant message; however the
population pyramids (Appendix 3) for medium variant will bring some lights for policy
makers. The maximum number of populations in 2011 was observed in the younger age
groups. Then gradually it shifts to middle and older age groups due to increased childbearing
age and higher life expectancy. The projected total populations by sex are presented in Table
4.5.
Age Year
group 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
0-4 15659 15175 16311 17206 17211 16893 16824 17069 17440 17754 17946
5-9 18894 14981 14571 15716 16658 16714 16474 16446 16723 17153 17491
10-14 17314 18831 14935 14532 15681 16625 16687 16450 16425 16707 17137
15-19 13375 17268 18785 14903 14505 15656 16603 16667 16433 16411 16694
20-24 13829 13328 17214 18733 14868 14475 15629 16578 16645 16415 16395
25-29 14017 13772 13278 17156 18680 14831 14445 15599 16550 16622 16395
30-34 10918 13945 13708 13223 17095 18620 14792 14410 15566 16522 16597
35-39 9945 10843 13858 13630 13158 17020 18552 14743 14368 15529 16486
40-44 8590 9843 10741 13740 13530 13069 16921 18455 14673 14312 15475
45-49 6628 8453 9699 10596 13576 13384 12944 16773 18308 14577 14227
50-54 5767 6453 8244 9476 10378 13319 13162 12743 16534 18091 14420
55-59 3640 5512 6184 7921 9140 10034 12928 12808 12420 16181 17740
60-64 4089 3374 5129 5776 7439 8621 9520 12316 12251 11953 15623
65-69 2194 3615 2997 4583 5202 6739 7884 8758 11403 11479 11247
70-74 2314 1805 2997 2502 3873 4433 5818 6871 7703 10211 10373
75-79 914 1713 1350 2267 1922 3012 3510 4667 5588 6429 8637
80+ 1677 1310 1683 1633 2260 2348 3206 4033 5352 6941 8567
Total 149764 160221 171684 183593 195176 205793 215899 225386 234382 243287 251450
Age Year
group 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
0-4 15659 15175 16311 15709 14218 13955 13773 13529 13162 12858 12520
5-9 18894 14981 14571 15716 15210 13807 13609 13464 13255 12945 12668
10-14 17314 18831 14935 14532 15681 15180 13785 13589 13446 13242 12933
15-19 13375 17268 18785 14903 14505 15656 15160 13769 13575 13435 13232
20-24 13829 13328 17214 18733 14868 14475 15629 15136 13750 13560 13422
25-29 14017 13772 13278 17156 18680 14831 14445 15599 15111 13731 13544
30-34 10918 13945 13708 13223 17095 18620 14792 14410 15566 15085 13710
35-39 9945 10843 13858 13630 13158 17020 18552 14743 14368 15529 15052
40-44 8590 9843 10741 13740 13530 13069 16921 18455 14673 14312 15475
45-49 6628 8453 9699 10596 13576 13384 12944 16773 18308 14577 14227
50-54 5767 6453 8244 9476 10378 13319 13162 12743 16534 18091 14420
55-59 3640 5512 6184 7921 9140 10034 12928 12808 12420 16181 17740
60-64 4089 3374 5129 5776 7439 8621 9520 12316 12251 11953 15623
65-69 2194 3615 2997 4583 5202 6739 7884 8758 11403 11479 11247
70-74 2314 1805 2997 2502 3873 4433 5818 6871 7703 10211 10373
75-79 914 1713 1350 2267 1922 3012 3510 4667 5588 6429 8637
80+ 1677 1310 1683 1633 2260 2348 3206 4033 5352 6941 8567
Total 149764 160221 171684 182096 190735 198503 205638 211663 216465 220559 223390
Table 4.8: Baseline and projected total population by 5-year age-group, Bangladesh (in thousands): Scenario III
Age Year
group 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
0-4 15659 15175 16311 15709 14218 11751 11598 11393 10926 10317 9594
5-9 18894 14981 14571 15716 15210 13807 11460 11338 11162 10746 10164
10-14 17314 18831 14935 14532 15681 15180 13785 11443 11323 11151 10736
15-19 13375 17268 18785 14903 14505 15656 15160 13769 11431 11314 11142
20-24 13829 13328 17214 18733 14868 14475 15629 15136 13750 11419 11303
25-29 14017 13772 13278 17156 18680 14831 14445 15599 15111 13731 11405
30-34 10918 13945 13708 13223 17095 18620 14792 14410 15566 15085 13710
35-39 9945 10843 13858 13630 13158 17020 18552 14743 14368 15529 15052
40-44 8590 9843 10741 13740 13530 13069 16921 18455 14673 14312 15475
45-49 6628 8453 9699 10596 13576 13384 12944 16773 18308 14577 14227
50-54 5767 6453 8244 9476 10378 13319 13162 12743 16534 18091 14420
55-59 3640 5512 6184 7921 9140 10034 12928 12808 12420 16181 17740
60-64 4089 3374 5129 5776 7439 8621 9520 12316 12251 11953 15623
65-69 2194 3615 2997 4583 5202 6739 7884 8758 11403 11479 11247
70-74 2314 1805 2997 2502 3873 4433 5818 6871 7703 10211 10373
75-79 914 1713 1350 2267 1922 3012 3510 4667 5588 6429 8637
80+ 1677 1310 1683 1633 2260 2348 3206 4033 5352 6941 8567
Total 149764 160221 171684 182096 190735 196299 201314 205255 207869 209466 209415
Similar pattern is seen for Scenario III in Table 4.8. Up to the age group 25-29, population
decreases more rapidly in Scenario III than in Scenario II. Like the previous scenarios,
population increases in the age groups 30-34 and later. It is interesting to note that population
in the older age groups are almost identical across the scenarios.
Urbanization has become a key striving factor in Bangladesh economy. There is huge labor
and temporary migration in mega cities like: Dhaka, Chittagong etc. only for job
opportunities and degradation of arable land. Still it is an agro-economy based country and
rural areas have much
Table 4.9: Baseline and projected total population by three scenarios and residences, Bangladesh (in thousands)
higher proportion of total population, but diminishing marginal income and low opportunity
cost play an important role for today’s urbanization. In this report, the projected urban
population is obtained from the projected national population using estimated proportion of
the urban population in projection years. The estimated proportion of urban population is
obtained using a log-linear model fitted to the observed proportion (obtained from SVRS
reports) over the years 1997-2011. The detail on the urban-rural projection is given in
appendix 1. Table 4.9 depicts a sharp increase in urban projected population in all three
scenarios. Scenario I consists the constant TFR at 2.3 all through the projection period and
eventually shows the higher trend in rural areas that is quite different from other two
scenarios, where the rural population is starting to lessen from the year 2036-41. Initiating
One of the objectives of this report is to project population of 64 districts of Bangladesh over
the period 2016-2061. The commonly used cohort component method is applied for
projection of different districts separately, where total population for male and female are
obtained from 2011 population census, the proportion of populations in different age groups
are obtained from long questionnaire census data, the same life expectancy values that were
used for national projection are also used for district projections. Ideally we need to assume
TFR values for 64 districts for the years of the period 2011-2061, which is not easy. The
detail list of districts of three categories is given in Appendix 2. Instead of this, 64 districts
are divided into three groups based on the corresponding TFR estimates obtained from 2011
population census.
For each group of districts, TFR values are assumed for the years over the period 2011-2061
(Table A3) and then cohort component method is applied for each district separately to obtain
projected district-wise total population. The main limitation of this approach of projecting
district-wise population is that it may give a different national projected population than that
was obtained in Table 4.3. To overcome this problem the proportion of national population
total for each district is estimated for the years of the period 2016-2061 and then district-
specific population are obtained by using the previously obtained national population for
different years.
According to BDHS (2014), only Dhaka division shows the increasing pattern of TFR, still
Chittagong and Sylhet divisions have high TFR, 2.5 and 2.9 respectively. Table 4.10a-4.10g
illustrates an increasing pattern of projected population in all 64 districts from the base-year
2011 to 2061, only scenario II is shown here. To be noted here, though we have made
district-wise projection, but for presentation purpose we grouped the districts within different
divisions. Division did not play any role in district-wise projection.
Table 4.10a: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Barisal division (in
thousands): Scenario II
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 8652 9145 9713 10241 10663 11020 11327 11568 11738 11865 11915
Barguna 928 969 1013 1054 1083 1104 1119 1125 1123 1116 1101
Barisal 2415 2583 2776 2950 3094 3224 3346 3454 3544 3625 3685
Bhola 1846 1941 2057 2173 2267 2342 2401 2442 2466 2477 2469
Jhalokati 710 741 778 812 836 854 867 874 876 874 866
Patuakhali 1596 1703 1823 1934 2028 2113 2191 2259 2315 2364 2401
Pirojpur 1157 1208 1266 1318 1355 1383 1403 1414 1414 1409 1393
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 29555 31980 34747 37307 39495 41532 43480 45245 46778 48167 49280
Bandarban 404 434 469 503 533 560 584 605 622 637 649
Brahmanbaria 2953 3255 3617 3978 4313 4649 4995 5338 5676 6013 6338
Chandpur 2514 2707 2929 3129 3299 3456 3606 3740 3855 3958 4037
Chittagong 7914 8440 8990 9460 9805 10080 10295 10429 10474 10456 10343
Comilla 5603 6046 6559 7033 7442 7820 8176 8495 8769 9014 9204
CBazar 2382 2655 2979 3295 3580 3865 4158 4450 4732 5010 5272
Feni 1496 1619 1754 1872 1971 2064 2153 2233 2300 2358 2401
Khagrachari 639 685 738 789 832 871 907 937 962 984 1000
Lakshimpur 1798 1995 2223 2435 2625 2818 3022 3227 3424 3620 3807
Noakhali 3232 3491 3799 4090 4346 4581 4802 5002 5175 5331 5453
Rangamati 620 653 690 723 749 768 782 789 789 786 776
Table 4.10c: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Khulna division (in thousands):
Scenario II
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 16308 17252 18217 19017 19609 20082 20462 20698 20777 20769 20622
Bagerhat 1534 1601 1675 1739 1783 1814 1834 1841 1835 1820 1793
Chuadanga 1175 1237 1299 1349 1384 1408 1424 1427 1419 1402 1376
Jessore 2876 3029 3182 3307 3391 3451 3492 3504 3486 3452 3390
Jhenaidha 1843 1976 2111 2223 2314 2395 2471 2533 2578 2614 2634
Khulna 2407 2528 2650 2750 2818 2867 2898 2907 2891 2862 2812
Kushtia 2024 2170 2318 2439 2538 2626 2708 2773 2821 2859 2882
Magura 955 1020 1091 1153 1205 1251 1294 1330 1358 1382 1399
Meherpur 681 716 750 777 794 806 813 813 805 794 778
Narail 750 801 856 906 949 987 1022 1053 1077 1099 1115
Satkhira 2063 2174 2285 2374 2433 2477 2506 2517 2507 2485 2443
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 49318 52539 56064 59289 61943 64294 66416 68157 69489 70587 71275
Dhaka 12516 13142 13798 14366 14777 15081 15291 15372 15323 15193 14936
Faridpur 1989 2088 2201 2304 2381 2441 2484 2509 2516 2512 2489
Gazipur 3548 3809 4046 4230 4358 4458 4534 4569 4556 4510 4418
Gopalganj 1218 1277 1346 1412 1462 1501 1530 1549 1556 1556 1545
Jamalpur 2385 2541 2713 2873 3013 3137 3249 3342 3417 3483 3532
Kishoregonj 3028 3311 3648 3985 4295 4605 4923 5237 5544 5852 6150
Madaripur 1212 1295 1393 1483 1560 1628 1692 1748 1796 1838 1871
Manikganj 1447 1542 1640 1724 1794 1857 1916 1964 2002 2034 2056
Munshiganj 1502 1583 1669 1743 1797 1839 1870 1887 1889 1881 1858
Mymensingh 5314 5807 6378 6932 7438 7947 8472 8990 9492 9993 10477
Narayanganj 3074 3284 3490 3662 3786 3883 3956 3995 3996 3972 3910
Narshingdi 2314 2489 2685 2866 3022 3164 3294 3407 3501 3584 3646
Netrokona 2317 2516 2759 3005 3235 3462 3695 3924 4148 4374 4592
Rajbari 1091 1144 1201 1252 1290 1318 1339 1349 1349 1342 1326
Shariatpur 1202 1284 1385 1481 1563 1639 1709 1772 1826 1876 1915
Sherpur 1412 1504 1607 1707 1794 1872 1943 2003 2052 2095 2128
Tangail 3749 3923 4105 4264 4378 4462 4519 4540 4526 4492 4426
Table 4.10e: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Rajshahi division (in thousands):
Scenario II
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 19225 20412 21607 22621 23398 24037 24559 24903 25056 25102 24977
Bogra 3539 3724 3903 4050 4151 4224 4270 4280 4254 4208 4129
CNwabganj 1714 1854 2003 2133 2242 2341 2432 2511 2574 2627 2666
Joypurhat 950 998 1042 1076 1097 1111 1118 1116 1104 1087 1062
Naogaon 2702 2844 2977 3082 3151 3198 3227 3228 3201 3159 3093
Natore 1775 1866 1956 2031 2082 2119 2142 2148 2134 2110 2070
Pabna 2625 2818 3019 3195 3345 3480 3606 3710 3791 3858 3903
Rajshahi 2699 2853 3000 3116 3193 3247 3282 3290 3267 3226 3159
Sirajgonj 3221 3455 3707 3938 4137 4317 4482 4620 4731 4827 4895
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 10296 11291 12463 13601 14642 15669 16711 17727 18702 19656 20556
Habiganj 2171 2386 2640 2891 3125 3358 3598 3834 4065 4294 4516
Maulavibazar 1994 2148 2324 2486 2626 2753 2870 2973 3059 3135 3192
Sunamganj 2564 2800 3091 3392 3677 3960 4245 4526 4802 5077 5343
Sylhet 3567 3957 4408 4832 5214 5598 5998 6394 6776 7150 7505
Table 4.10g: Baseline and projected total population by district and age-group, Rangpur division (in thousands):
Scenario II
District Year
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
Total 16412 17602 18868 20015 20986 21867 22678 23368 23925 24412 24770
Dinajpur 3110 3268 3430 3571 3672 3746 3795 3814 3801 3770 3711
Gaibandha 2472 2718 2975 3212 3424 3640 3865 4085 4294 4501 4700
Kurigram 2151 2301 2464 2613 2743 2860 2967 3057 3129 3193 3238
Lalmonirhat 1305 1398 1500 1595 1676 1748 1814 1870 1916 1955 1984
Nilphamari 1907 2049 2204 2346 2469 2579 2679 2763 2832 2892 2935
Panchagar 1026 1104 1188 1264 1328 1386 1438 1482 1517 1547 1567
Rangpur 2996 3211 3439 3643 3816 3972 4113 4231 4324 4403 4457
Thakurgaon 1445 1553 1668 1771 1858 1936 2007 2066 2112 2151 2178
Table 4.11: Baseline and projected labor force (in percentage of total population) and dependency ratio
by three scenarios, Bangladesh
Table 4.12 delineates the future mothers at reproductive age. An efficient future generation is
only possible from an efficient group of mothers. If the future mothers (ranges from 39,939 to
54,798 thousands) are nurtured with proper health care, nourishment and education, then
Bangladesh may opt for the rapid development with large population turning into a large
manpower. Figure 2 shows a comparison of projected female population at reproductive ages
for three scenarios.
Table 4.12: Projected Female Population Aged 15-49 Years (mothers accounted for TFR) in Three
Scenarios (in thousands)
Figure 2: Projected female population aged 15-49 years (mothers accounted for TFR) in
three scenarios (in 100,000)
Table 4.13: Projected primary school enrollment (6-11 years old in thousands) in three scenarios
Figure 3: Projected primary school enrollment (6-11 years old in millions) in three scenarios
Table 4.14: Estimated net migration rate and number of net migrants by age-group by sex (per 100,000)
Projected population considering international migration has been made for scenario II and
presented in Table 4.15. It shows that if we consider international migration, then the total
population is going to be 219.70 million. For a country like Bangladesh the net migration
rates at middle ages are always negative. More people leave the country for work and
education than the number that comes in. This fact is also reflected in our estimated net
migration rates. Here is a representation of the age and sex specific net migration rates that
we have derived from the above mentioned sources. The rates were available only up to the
age group 65+.
Age Year
Group
2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
0-4 15659 15175 16311 15709 14218 13955 13773 13529 13162 12858 12520
5-9 18938 15015 14604 15752 15245 13839 13640 13495 13286 12975 12697
10-14 17405 18929 15013 14607 15762 15259 13856 13660 13516 13310 13000
15-19 12942 16697 18169 14419 14030 15143 14664 13319 13131 12995 12798
20-24 12796 12180 15700 17099 13584 13214 14267 13819 12555 12380 12251
25-29 13246 13057 12480 16102 17542 13937 13566 14650 14193 12898 12721
30-34 10513 13451 13249 12711 16420 17891 14218 13847 14957 14495 13175
35-39 9646 10523 13468 13270 12752 16483 17972 14286 13919 15044 14583
40-44 8435 9676 10562 13521 13329 12839 16617 18125 14414 14057 15199
45-49 6572 8384 9624 10516 13479 13295 12840 16636 18159 14460 14112
50-54 5760 6445 8235 9468 10368 13309 13154 12730 16517 18072 14406
55-59 3639 5512 6183 7920 9140 10034 12929 12810 12419 16180 17739
60-64 4089 3374 5130 5776 7440 8622 9521 12318 12254 11954 15625
65+ 7110 8455 9040 11000 13274 16554 20446 24362 30084 35105 38874
Total 146750 156873 167768 177870 186583 194374 201463 207586 212566 216783 219700
A comparative picture of projected population is shown in table 4.16 from four different
institutions based on the different base years.
Table 4.16: Baseline and projected total population by 5-year age-group, Bangladesh 2050-51 (in millions)
Age group UN Census Bureau World Bank BBS (2007) ISRT (2015): scenario II
(in 2050) (in 2050) (in 2051) (in 2051)
0-4 15.79 11.21 14.53 13.16
5-9 15.80 11.63 14.19 13.26
10-14 16.01 12.07 13.82 13.45
15-19 16.07 12.45 13.92 13.58
20-24 15.86 12.86 14.60 13.75
25-29 15.57 13.38 15.11 15.11
30-34 15.33 13.71 14.84 15.57
35-39 15.40 13.84 13.55 14.37
40-44 16.14 13.69 13.31 14.67
45-49 16.81 14.34 14.82 18.31
50-54 15.97 14.24 15.69 16.53
Contd.
In this study, an attempt has been made to project the population in Bangladesh and explore
the distributions among various sectors. Three different scenarios have been chosen on the
basis of policy options that may emerge in the socio-economic setting of Bangladesh. In
2061, the population of Bangladesh is estimated to be 251,450 thousand under high variant
fertility assumption (scenario I), 223,390 thousand under medium variant fertility assumption
(scenario II) and 209,415 thousand under low variant fertility assumption (scenario III). The
obtained population has been split into different sectors like school going children, youth,
labour force, dependents, etc. The figures there can help government and non-government
agencies in formulating their policies. The population at national level is also presented in
single-years to make it suitable to different stakeholders.
The age structure of projected population shows a curvature pattern for all age groups, there
are ups and downs in total numbers and proportion changes. A sharp increase of urbanization
has been depicted in all three scenarios. The age-specific projected values show that at the
age of 30-34 and onwards, population increases sharply. This indicates movement of the
population towards the older age groups, the increase in the old age population will pose a
formidable challenge to the policy makers if necessary measures to take care of the old age
population are not considered with top priority. This increased projected population could
create implementation and institutional challenges.
In Section 4, the projected national population is reported for 10 different years over the
period 2016-2061. In this section, the methods of projecting urban and rural populations are
described for the same 10 years. Given the national projected population, the urban projected
population of a specific year is obtained by using the estimated proportion of urban
population of the same year. To obtain the estimated proportion of urban population for the
entire projected years 2016–2061, the SVRS estimates of the proportion of urban population
over the years 1997–2011 (Table A1) are used to construct a model.
Using the fitted model for the proportion of urban population at time t, pu=exp (‐
22.68+0.0129t), the predicted percentage of urban population for different years are given in
the Table A2.. Using this proportion, the projected urban and rural populations of a year are
obtained from the corresponding projected national population.
Table A2. Projected percentage of urban population for different years over the period 2016-2061
Year 2011 2016 2021 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2061
pu 26.1 27.9 29.7 31.7 33.8 36.1 38.5 41.0 43.8 46.7 49.8
Below the list of Group-A districts for which the TFR estimates range from 1.51 to 1.99.
The districts of Group-B for which the TFR estimates range from 2.02 to 2.5 are:
And the districts of Group-C for which the TFR estimates range from 2.54 to 3.48 are:
Groups of districts
Year
Group A Group B Group C
2011 1.80 2.30 3.00
2016 1.80 2.30 3.00
2021 1.70 2.10 2.70
2026 1.50 1.90 2.40
2031 1.50 1.90 2.40
2036 1.50 1.90 2.40
2041 1.50 1.90 2.40
2046 1.50 1.90 2.40
2051 1.50 1.90 2.40
2056 1.50 1.90 2.40
2061 1.50 1.90 2.40
Age Year
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
0 1266 1360 1453 1547 1641 1724 1719 1714
1 1436 1459 1483 1506 1529 1552 1571 1589
2 1574 1545 1516 1487 1458 1435 1467 1499
3 1682 1617 1553 1488 1423 1369 1404 1440
4 1762 1676 1590 1504 1418 1344 1376 1408
5 1816 1722 1627 1533 1439 1356 1378 1400
6 1848 1756 1664 1571 1479 1397 1404 1411
7 1858 1777 1695 1614 1532 1458 1448 1439
8 1851 1787 1723 1659 1595 1535 1507 1479
9 1826 1785 1743 1702 1660 1618 1572 1527
10 1792 1777 1763 1748 1733 1713 1648 1582
11 1753 1769 1784 1800 1815 1820 1732 1643
12 1694 1735 1776 1817 1858 1885 1790 1694
13 1607 1665 1723 1780 1838 1882 1804 1726
14 1508 1575 1642 1709 1776 1832 1787 1742
15 1408 1486 1564 1642 1721 1790 1775 1760
16 1297 1389 1481 1574 1666 1751 1766 1782
17 1244 1335 1425 1516 1606 1692 1733 1774
18 1281 1346 1412 1477 1542 1607 1664 1722
19 1374 1400 1427 1453 1479 1510 1577 1644
20 1458 1447 1436 1425 1414 1412 1490 1568
21 1544 1493 1442 1390 1339 1302 1394 1486
22 1604 1530 1455 1381 1306 1248 1338 1429
23 1618 1548 1478 1409 1339 1283 1348 1413
24 1599 1552 1505 1458 1411 1372 1398 1424
25 1587 1559 1532 1504 1477 1451 1440 1429
26 1578 1570 1562 1554 1545 1533 1482 1431
27 1542 1553 1565 1576 1588 1591 1517 1442
28 1468 1497 1526 1556 1585 1604 1535 1465
29 1371 1416 1461 1506 1551 1587 1541 1494
30 1273 1335 1398 1460 1523 1576 1549 1522
31 1166 1249 1331 1414 1497 1570 1562 1554
32 1088 1179 1270 1361 1452 1535 1547 1558
33 1057 1139 1222 1304 1387 1464 1493 1522
34 1055 1118 1181 1244 1307 1368 1413 1458
35 1048 1092 1137 1181 1226 1272 1334 1397
36 1042 1066 1090 1114 1138 1167 1249 1332
37 1026 1037 1048 1060 1071 1090 1181 1271
38 993 1004 1016 1027 1039 1057 1139 1221
39 948 968 988 1009 1029 1053 1116 1179
40 908 935 961 988 1015 1043 1088 1132
Age Year
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
0 1293 1404 1515 1626 1737 1835 1819 1802
1 1470 1503 1537 1570 1603 1635 1651 1667
2 1616 1591 1567 1542 1517 1499 1534 1569
3 1735 1669 1604 1538 1473 1418 1461 1504
4 1826 1735 1645 1554 1464 1386 1427 1468
5 1893 1791 1689 1586 1484 1395 1426 1458
6 1937 1835 1733 1630 1528 1438 1453 1469
7 1959 1866 1774 1681 1588 1505 1501 1496
8 1961 1885 1810 1734 1659 1588 1563 1538
9 1945 1892 1840 1787 1734 1682 1636 1589
10 1915 1891 1866 1842 1817 1788 1718 1648
11 1876 1884 1893 1901 1909 1907 1809 1712
12 1815 1852 1888 1925 1962 1984 1876 1768
13 1728 1784 1839 1895 1950 1991 1900 1809
14 1625 1692 1759 1826 1894 1948 1892 1836
15 1520 1600 1680 1761 1841 1911 1886 1862
16 1411 1505 1599 1693 1787 1873 1881 1890
17 1323 1422 1521 1621 1720 1813 1849 1886
18 1271 1363 1455 1547 1639 1728 1783 1838
19 1245 1322 1398 1475 1551 1627 1694 1761
20 1216 1277 1338 1400 1461 1524 1604 1684
21 1183 1229 1274 1320 1365 1415 1509 1603
22 1174 1203 1233 1262 1292 1328 1427 1526
23 1196 1210 1225 1239 1253 1275 1367 1459
24 1236 1237 1238 1238 1239 1248 1324 1400
25 1277 1264 1250 1237 1223 1217 1278 1339
26 1326 1296 1266 1236 1206 1184 1229 1274
27 1342 1307 1271 1236 1201 1172 1201 1231
28 1301 1279 1256 1234 1211 1192 1207 1221
29 1225 1226 1227 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233
30 1156 1179 1203 1226 1250 1270 1256 1243
31 1083 1131 1180 1228 1276 1317 1287 1257
32 1028 1091 1153 1216 1279 1332 1297 1262
33 1006 1065 1124 1182 1241 1292 1270 1247
34 1006 1049 1093 1136 1179 1218 1219 1221
35 999 1029 1060 1090 1121 1150 1174 1197
36 990 1008 1025 1043 1060 1081 1129 1177
37 980 988 997 1005 1013 1027 1089 1152
38 968 974 981 987 993 1005 1063 1122
39 952 961 970 980 989 1001 1045 1088
40 938 949 959 970 980 993 1023 1054
Age Year
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
0 2586 2808 3030 3252 3474 3670 3638 3604
1 2940 3006 3074 3140 3206 3270 3302 3334
2 3232 3182 3134 3084 3034 2998 3068 3138
3 3470 3338 3208 3076 2946 2836 2922 3008
4 3652 3470 3290 3108 2928 2772 2854 2936
5 3786 3582 3378 3172 2968 2790 2852 2916
6 3874 3670 3466 3260 3056 2876 2906 2938
7 3918 3732 3548 3362 3176 3010 3002 2992
8 3922 3770 3620 3468 3318 3176 3126 3076
9 3890 3784 3680 3574 3468 3364 3272 3178
10 3830 3782 3732 3684 3634 3576 3436 3296
11 3752 3768 3786 3802 3818 3814 3618 3424
12 3630 3704 3776 3850 3924 3968 3752 3536
13 3456 3568 3678 3790 3900 3982 3800 3618
14 3250 3384 3518 3652 3788 3896 3784 3672
15 3040 3200 3360 3522 3682 3822 3772 3724
16 2822 3010 3198 3386 3574 3746 3762 3780
17 2646 2844 3042 3242 3440 3626 3698 3772
18 2542 2726 2910 3094 3278 3456 3566 3676
19 2490 2644 2796 2950 3102 3254 3388 3522
20 2432 2554 2676 2800 2922 3048 3208 3368
21 2366 2458 2548 2640 2730 2830 3018 3206
22 2348 2406 2466 2524 2584 2656 2854 3052
23 2392 2420 2450 2478 2506 2550 2734 2918
24 2472 2474 2476 2476 2478 2496 2648 2800
25 2554 2528 2500 2474 2446 2434 2556 2678
26 2652 2592 2532 2472 2412 2368 2458 2548
27 2684 2614 2542 2472 2402 2344 2402 2462
28 2602 2558 2512 2468 2422 2384 2414 2442
29 2450 2452 2454 2458 2460 2462 2464 2466
30 2312 2358 2406 2452 2500 2540 2512 2486
31 2166 2262 2360 2456 2552 2634 2574 2514
32 2056 2182 2306 2432 2558 2664 2594 2524
33 2012 2130 2248 2364 2482 2584 2540 2494
34 2012 2098 2186 2272 2358 2436 2438 2442
35 1998 2058 2120 2180 2242 2300 2348 2394
36 1980 2016 2050 2086 2120 2162 2258 2354
37 1960 1976 1994 2010 2026 2054 2178 2304
38 1936 1948 1962 1974 1986 2010 2126 2244
39 1904 1922 1940 1960 1978 2002 2090 2176
40 1876 1898 1918 1940 1960 1986 2046 2108
A comparative chart is illustrated below to show the trend analysis of TFR, in historical point of view
Bangladesh has the second highest TFR from its early stage compare to its neighboring countries,
After the years 1980-85, its TFR falls down drastically and experience a stagnant fertility rate for few
years, in recent years TFR starts falling again and positioned as the second lowest country among
SAARC.
References
BDHS 2011: NIPORT - National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates,
and ICF International. 2013. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2011, Dhaka and
Calverton: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates, & ICF International.
BDHS 2014: NIPORT-National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates,
and ICF International. 2015. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2014: Key
Indicators. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NIPORT, Mitra and Associates,
and ICF International.
Bongaarts, J. (1978). A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. Population
and Development Review 4(1): 105-132.40.
Bongaarts, J. (1982). The Fertility-Inhibiting Effects of the Intermediate Fertility Variables. Studies in
Family Planning 13(6/7): 179-189.
Bongaarts J. and B. Cohen (1998). Adolescent Reproductive Behavior in the Developing World.
Introduction and Overview. Studies in Family Planning 29(2): 99-105.
Bongaarts, J. and G.R. Potter (1983). Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate
Determinants. New York: Academic Press.
Biswas, S.C. and J.C. Paul (1996). Population Projection and Fertility for Bangladesh 2020. Journal of
Family Welfare 42(4): 45-50.
Bowley, A (1924). Births and Population in Great Britain. The Economic Journal 334: 188–192.
BPP (2012): Bangladesh Population Policy. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of
the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Campbell, P. R. (1996). Population Projections for States by Age, Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin:
1995 to 2025, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Population Division, PPL-47.
Cannan, E (1895). The Probability of a Cessation of the Growth of Population in England and Wales
during the Next Century. The Economic Journal 5: 506–515.
Cassen R. H. and T. Dyson (1976). “New Population Projections for India”, Population and
Development Review, Vol.2 No.1 March.
Chaudhary, M. (1986): Poparative study of India’s Population Projections Based on the 1981 Census,
Demography India, Vol. 15, No.1
Colby, S. L. and J. M. Ortman (2014). Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S.
Population: 2014 to 2060, Current Population Reports, P25-1143, U.S. Census Bureau,
Washington, DC, 2014.
El-Saharty, S., K. Z. Ahsan and J. F. May (2014), Population , Family Planning and Reproductive
Health Policy Harmonization in Bangladesh, World Bank.
Government of India (1996). Population Projection of India and States, Registrar General of India,
New Delhi.
Haque, M. M., F. Ahmed, S. Anam, M. R. Kabir (2012). Future Population Projection of Bangladesh
by Growth Rate Modeling Using Logistic Population Model, Annals of Pure and Applied
Mathematics, 2: 192-202.
Islam, A. (2000). Population Momentum in Bangladesh. Paper 7, Centre for Policy Dialogue,
Bangladesh.
Kabir, M. and Chowdhury, A. A (1982). Population Growth and Food Production in Bangladesh,
Rural Demography, IX (1 & 2): 25-56.
Keilman, N. (1998). How accurate are the United Nations world population projections? In Lutz, W.,
Vaupel, J. W., and Ahlburg, D. A. (eds) Frontiers of Population Forecasting, supplement to
Population and Development Review, 24, 15-41.
Kintner, H., and D. A. Swanson (1994). Estimating Vital Rates from Corporate Databases: How Long
Will GM’s Salaried Retirees Live? In H. Kintner, T. Merrick, P. Morrison, and P. Voss (Eds.),
Demographics: A Casebook for Business and Government (pp. 265–295). Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Lee, R., and S. Tuljapurkar (1997). Death and Taxes: Longer Life, Consumption and Social Security.
Demography 34: 67–81.
Mahsin, M and Hossain, S. H. (2012). Population forecasts for Bangladesh, using a Bayesian
methodology, J Health Popul Nutr, 30(4): 456-463.
Mason, A. (1996). Population and Housing. Population Research and Policy Review 15(5–6): 419–
435.
MDG 2015: Millennium Development Goals: Bangladesh Progress Report 2015, Bangladesh
Planning Commission.
Michaud, G., J. P. George, and S. Loh (1996). Projections of Persons with Disabilities (Limited at
Work/Perception); Canada, Provinces, and Territories, 1993–2016. Ottawa, Canada: Statistics
Canada.
Miller, T. (2001). “Increasing Longevity and Medicare Expenditures.” Demography 38: 215–226.
Natrajan K.S. (1982). Population Projections in Population of India: Country Monograph Series
No.10, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, New York.
Notestein, F.W. (1945). Population: The long view, in T. W. Schultz, ed., Food for the World,
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA. Pp. 36-69.
Obaidullah, M. (1976), Expo-linear Model for Population Growth, Rural Demography, III (1&2): 43-
69.
Opitz, W. and H. Nelson (1996). Short-Term Population-Based Forecasting in the Public Sector: A
Dynamic Caseload Simulation Model. Population Research and Policy Review 15: 549–563.
Oregon Office of Economic Analysis (2000). Oregon Corrections Population Forecast. Salem, OR:
Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Office of Economic Analysis.
Rabbani A.K.M.G. and M.S. Hossain (1981). Population Projection of Bangladesh (1975-2025):
Under Assumptions of Decreasing Fertility and Decreasing Mortality (df-dm) and Constant
Fertility and Decreasing Mortality (cf-dm). Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
Siegel, J. S. and D. A. Swanson (2004). The Methods and Materials of Demography, Elsevier, New
York.
Smith, S., J. Tayman and D. A. Swanson (2001). State and Local Population Projections:
Methodology and Analysis. New York.
Stover, J. and S. Kirmeyer (2005). DemProj Version 4: A Computer Program for Making Population
Projections. Washington, DC: Futures Group International.
SVRS (2011). Sample Vital Registration System 2009. Dhaka: Ministry of Planning.
Swanson, D., G. Hough, J. Rodriguez, and C. Clemans (1998). K-12 Enrollment Forecasting:
Merging Methods and Judgment. ERS Spectrum 16: 24–31.
Tayman, J., B. Parrott, and S. Carnevale (1994). Locating Fire Station Sites: The Response Time
Component. In H. Kintner, P. Voss, P. Morrison, and T. Merrick (Eds.), Applied
Demographics: A Casebook for Business and Government (pp. 203–217). Boulder, CO:
Westview Press.
Texas Water Development Board (1997). Water for Texas: A Consensus-Based Update to the State
Water Plan, Vol. II, technical planning appendix. Austin, TX: Texas Water Development
Board.
Thomas, R (1994). Using Demographic Analysis in Health Services Planning: A Case Study in
Obstetrical Services. In H. Kintner, T. Merrick, P. Morrison, and P. Voss (Eds.), Demographics:
A Casebook for Business and Government (pp. 159–179). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Uddin, M. S. G. (2014). Target Population Projection for National EPI Program of Bangladesh, 2014-
2021. Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), Dhaka.
UN (2014). The World Population Situation in 2014, Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Population Division, New York: United Nations.
Visaria L. and Praveen Visaria (1966): Perspective Population Growth and Policy Options for India
1991-2001, New York, The Population Council.
Whelpton, P (1928). “Population of the United States, 1925 to 1975.” American Journal of Sociology
34: 253–270.
World Population Prospects (2014). The 2012 Revision, Methodology of the United Nations
Population Estimates and Projections, New York.