[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
86 views11 pages

Split Faction y Split Ratio

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 11

Lecture 3.

Basic Separation Concepts (2)


( )
[Ch. 1]
• Component Recoveries and Product Purities
-SSplit
li ffraction
i
- Split ratio
• Separation Power (Separation Factor)
• Selection of Feasible Separation Processes
- Keller’s correlation
- Technological and use maturities
- Ease of scale-up
Component Recoveries and
Product Purities
• Separation process
– Conservation of mass
– For no reaction and continuous,, steady-state
y operation
p

N
ni( F )   ni( p ) ni(1)  ni( 2 )  ni(3)  ...  ni( N 1)  ni( N )
p 1

i : 1 ~ C  Components
p : 1~ N  Product phases
F : feed

The molar
Th l ((or mass)) fl
flow rate iin the
h ffeed
d iis equall to
the sum of the product molar (or mass) flow rates
Split Fraction and Split Ratio

• Split fraction
ni(1)
SFi ,k  ,k Fraction of component i
ni(,Fk ) found in the first product
ni(1)
,k
• Split ratio

ni(,1k) SFi ,k ni(,Fk )


SRi ,k   Separator
k
n ( 2)
i ,k (1  SFi ,k )

i : component
k : separator
ni(2)
,k

(F) : feed
(1) : first product (ex: top product)
(2) : second product (ex : bottom product)
[Example] Hydrocarbon Recovery
Process
3 4 C3 6 iC4

Feed 1
C1 C2 C3

2 5 7 C4 rich
nC i h
C5+ rich
Product Purity and Specification

max

• Product specifications
- mol%, vol%, wt%
- ppm (parts per million), ppb (parts per billion)
Separation Sequences
• Hydrocarbon feed : propane (C3), isobutane (iC4), n-butane (nC4),
isopentane (iC5),
) n-pentane (nC5)
⇒ Products : C3, iC4, nC4, iC5 + nC5
Separation Power
• Separation power (relative split ratio; separation factor)
: relative degree of separation between two components
components, i and jj,
measured by the compositions of the two products

Ci(1) / Ci(2) SRi SFi / SFj


SPi , j  (1) (2)  
Cj /Cj SR j (1  SFi ) /(1  SFj )

Key-component split Column Separation power


nC4H10 / iC5H12 C1 137.1

C3H8 / iC4H10 C2 7103

iC4H10 / nC4H10 C3 377.6

Achievable SP depends on the number of stages, and the relative


thermodynamic and mass transport properties of components
Selection of Feasible Separation
• Selection of a best separation process
– Selection among a number of feasible candidates
– A combination of two or more operations may be best
• Factors that influence the selection of feasible separation
- Composition Most important
- Flow rate feed conditions
Feed conditions - Temperature
- Pressure Can be altered by
- Phase state pump, compressor,
- Required purities and heat exchangers
- Temperatures
Product conditions Mostt iimportant
M t t
- Pressures
- Phase states product conditions
- Molecular
Property differences Determine
D t i method
th d off
- Thermodynamic
that may be exploited - Transport separation
- Ease of scale-up
- Ease of staging
Characteristics of
- T, P, phase-state requirements
separation operation - Physical size limitations
- Energy requirements
Keller’’s correlation
Keller

• The cost of recovering


and purifying a chemical
in a mixture can depend
strongly on the
concentration.
• The more dilute the feed,
the higher the product
price.

Effect of concentration of product in


feed material on price
Technological and Use Maturities
of Separation Processes

Separation
by barrier Expensive
Separation by
solid agent

Creation or
addition of Cheap
second phase

Technological and use maturities of


separation processes
Ease of Scale-
Scale-up

• If two parallel units are installed, • The capacity of a single unit can
the additional investment is 100% be doubled for an additional
investment cost of about 60%

+ = 200 %
= 160 %

You might also like