CLARENCE TIU - Criminal Law Tables and Memory Aid
CLARENCE TIU - Criminal Law Tables and Memory Aid
OF CRIMINAL
LAW MEMORY
AID
IT BEGINS WITH FAITH & CONVICTION, PERSEVERES WITH HARD WORK & DISCIPLINE, AND
ENDS WITH AN IMPASSIONED TRIUMPH WITHIN , WHEN WE REALIZE THAT WE CAN DO ANYTHING
[SEE EPH. 3:20]
#EMBRACETHEGRIND
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW 3
TITLE 14 — QUASI-OFFENSES 89
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES
DEFINITION AND SOURCES Criminal law is that branch of public law which —
OF CRIMINAL LAW 1. Defines crimes
(ART. 1, 10) 2. Treats of its nature; and
3. Provides for its punishment
Sources of Criminal Law —
1. The Revised Penal Code (Act. No. 3815) as amended
‣ The RPC is the general governing penal law, it took effect on January 1, 1932 (Art. 1), but it is
supplementary to special penal laws enacted thereafter. (Art. 10)
2. Special Penal Laws
BILL OF ATTAINDER A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without trial. Its essence is the substitution
of a legislative act for a judicial determination of guilt. (People vs Ferrer)
GENERALITY OF PENAL RULE — Penal laws are binding on all persons who reside or sojourn in the Philippines whether citizens or not.
LAWS ‣ EXCEPTIONS — Under the following cases, a person may be exempt from liability —
(ART. 14, NCC; EQUAL 1. Laws of Preferential Application
PROTECTION CLAUSE) 2. Principles of public international law
3. Treaty stipulations
CONCEPT NOTES
TERRITORIALITY OF PENAL RULE — The law is applicable to all crimes committed within the limits of the Philippine Territory.
LAWS ‣ EXCEPTIONS — It is also enforceable outside the Philippine jurisdiction, against those who —
(ART. 2) 1. Should commit an offense while on a Philippine ship or airship
2. Should forge or counterfeit any coin or currency note of the Philippine Islands or obligations and
securities issued by the Government of the Philippine Islands;
3. Should be liable for acts connected with the introduction into these islands of the obligations
and securities mentioned in the presiding number;
4. While being public officers or employees, should commit an offense in the exercise of their
functions; or
5. Should commit any of the crimes against national security and the law of nations, defined in
Title One of Book Two of this Code.
PROSPECTIVITY OF PENAL Laws have prospective application unless they are favourable to the offender who is not a habitual
LAWS delinquent.
BASIS OF The basis of criminal liability is the The basis of criminal liability is the offender’s voluntariness, hence,
CRIMINAL offender’s moral trait, hence good faith or good faith or lack of criminal intent is not accepted as a defense,
LIABILITY lack of criminal intent is a defense. Intent unless this is an element of the crime. The only inquiry is whether the
governs law has been violated.
MATERIALITY OF Modifying circumstances are taken into Modifying circumstances are not considered because the law intends
MODIFYING account in imposing the penalty on the to discourage the commission of the act specially prohibited. It does
CIRCUMSTANCES
offender precisely because his moral trait is not involve perversity or lack of it by the offender which is the basis
the basis of this crime for the aggravation or mitigation of the penalty
DEGREE OF The degree of participation determines the The degree of participation of the offenders does not affect their
PARTICIPATION penalty imposable based on whether he is a liability, hence, the penalty on all of them are the same whether they
principal, accomplice or accessory are principals or merely accomplices or accessories.
STAGES OF The stage of accomplishment affects the The stage of accomplishment considered is only when the crime is
CRIMINAL penalty imposed thus the penalty depends accomplished or consummated. There is no attempted or frustrated
LIABILITY on whether the crime is consummated, stage because it is the commission of the act itself that is prohibited
frustrated, or attempted and also since intent which is inherent in attempted/frustrated stage
is not an element. Like culpa, mala prohibita is always consummated
MORAL Generally, involve moral turpitude Generally, do not involve moral turpitude
TURPITUDE
SOURCE OF LAW Generally are punishable under the RPC Generally, cover violations of special penal laws
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
KINDS OF FELONIES AS TO 1. Intentional Felonies—With malice and deliberate criminal intent, it is the intentional doing of a wrong
THE MEANS OF 2. Culpable Felonies — Without malice and deliberate criminal intent, it is by mere fault, or by
COMMISSION imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skill.
(ART. 3)
SPECIAL FACTORS 1. Mistake of Fact — Negates criminal liability, akin to a justifying circumstance under Art. 11
AFFECTING INTENT AND 2. Aberratio Ictus (Mistake in Blow) — Generally increases criminal liability, as a complex crime (Art. 48)
3. Error in personae (Mistake in Identity) — May or may not lower criminal liability depending on whether
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
the actual crime committed and the intended crime are of equal or different gravity (Art. 49)
4. Praeter Intentionem (No intent to cause so grave a wrong as that committed) — Lowers criminal liability
as a mitigating circumstance under Art. 13
5. Proximate Cause (The cause of the cause is the cause of the evil caused) — Gives rise to criminal
liability by analogy to Art. 4, par. 1
MISTAKE OF FACT 1. That the act done would have been lawful had the facts been as the accused believed them to be
2. That the intention of the accused in performing the act should be lawful
3. That the mistake must be without fault (imprudence or negligence) on the part of the accused
ABERRATIO ICTUS In aberratio ictus or error in the victim of the blow, the offender intends the injury on one person but the harm
(MISTAKE IN BLOW) fell on another. There are three persons present when the crime occurred:
1. Offender
2. Intended victim
3. Actual victim
ERROR IN PERSONAE In error in personae or mistake in the identity, the offender committed a mistake in ascertaining the identity
(MISTAKE IN IDENTITY) of the victim. The only two persons present here: the offended and the actual but unintended victim.
PRAETER INTENTIONEM In praeter intentionem, the injury is on the intended victim but the resulting injury or wrong is so grave than what
(NO INTENT TO CAUSE SO was intended.There is a great disparity between the intended felony and the actual felony committed.
GRAVE A WRONG AS THAT
COMMITTED)
PROXIMATE CAUSE 1. That the wrong done to the victim be the direct, natural, and logical consequence of the felony
committed by the offender, although it was different from that which he intended
2. Proximate cause is that cause which, in its natural and continuous sequence, unbroken by an efficient
intervening cause, produces the injury, and without which the result would not have occurred.
3. Any person who creates in another’s mind an immediate sense of danger, which causes the latter to do
something resulting in the latter’s injuries, is liable for such injuries.
SPECIAL FACTORS ON INTENT AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY
ABERRATIO ICTUS Intended result falls on another person Increases criminal liability which generally result to complex
(MISTAKE IN BLOW) or may be in addition to the injury on crime (Art. 48)
the intended victim
ERROR IN PERSONAE Intended result falls on another due to Mitigates criminal liability if the resulting crime is greater than
(MISTAKE IN IDENTITY) the error in the identity of the victim intended (such as parricide when what was intended was
merely homicide) (Art. 49) No effect on criminal liability if the
resulting crime is the same as that intended. (Art. 49)
PRATER INTENTIONEM Actual crime is greater than that Mitigates criminal liability (Art. 13)
(NO INTENT TO CAUSE A intended
WRONG AS THAT
COMMITTED)
PROXIMATE CAUSE Results in crime although not intended Results in criminal liability to the actor whether acting with
intent or through negligence
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
CONCEPT
CRIMINAL LIABILITY Criminal Liability is incurred in either of two ways —
(ART. 4) 1. By any person committing a felony (although the wrongful act done be different from that which he
intended)
2. By any person performing an act which would be an offense against persons or property, were it not for
the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment or an account of the employment of inadequate or
ineffectual means. (Impossible Crime)
CRIMINAL LIABILITY BY ANY ‣ A person who commits a felony is responsible for all the consequences which may naturally and
PERSON COMMITTING A logically result therefrom, whether foreseen or intended or not
FELONY (ART. 4, PAR. 1) ‣ Elements —
1. A person is committing a felony
2. That the wrong done to the victim be the direct, natural, and logical consequence of the felony
committed by the offender, although it was different from that which he intended
IMPOSSIBLE CRIME 1. That the act performed would be an offense against persons or property
(ART. 4, PAR. 2) 2. That the act was done with evil intent
3. That its accomplishment is inherently impossible, or that the means employed is either inadequate or
ineffectual
4. That the act performed should not constitute a violation of another provision of the RPC.
ACTS WHICH SHOULD BE Whenever an accused has committed an act not punishable by law, but should be repressed, as deemed
REPRESSED BUT ARE by the court, it shall render the proper decision and acquit the accused. It shall report to the Chief
NOT PUNISHED BY LAW Executive, through the Department of Justice, the reasons which induce the court to believe that said act
(ART. 5, PAR. 1) should be made the subject of legislation.
CASES OF EXCESSIVE In case the court finds the accused guilty, but the penalty is clearly excessive, it shall submit a statement
PENALTIES to the Chief Executive through the Department of Justice, a recommendation of executive clemency
(ART. 5, PAR. 2)
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
STAGES OF EXECUTION 1. Attempted — A felony is attempt when the offender commences the commission of a felony directly by
(ART. 6) overt acts, and does not perform all the acts of execution which should produce the felony by some cause
or accident other than his own spontaneous desistance.
2. Frustrated — A felony is frustrated when the offender performs all the acts of execution which would
produce the felony as a consequence but which, nevertheless, do not produce it by reason of causes
independent of the will of the perpetrator
3. Consummated — A felony is consummated when all the elements necessary for its execution and
accomplishment are present.
ATTEMPTED FELONIES 1. The offender commences the commission of the felony directly by overt acts
(ART. 6) 2. He does not perform all the acts of execution which should produce the felony
3. The non-performance of all the acts of execution was due to cause or accident other than his own
spontaneous desistance
CONSUMMATED FELONIES When all the elements necessary for its execution and accomplishment are present, the crime is
(ART. 6) consummated
CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES 1. Material felonies — Those which can be committed in any of the three stages of execution
AS TO THE MANNER OF 2. Formal felonies — Those which are always consummated (cannot be committed in the attempted and
COMMISSION IN RELATION frustrated stage)
TO THE STAGES OF a. Felonies punished on the basis of the result or gravity and the result cannot be determine
without first consummating the offense
EXECUTION
b. Felonies consummated by a single act, in one instant
c. Felonies by omission
d. Felonies consummated by mere attempt or proposal or by overt act
e. Impossible Crimes
3. Felonies which cannot be committed in the frustrated stage (only attempted or consummated)
a. Corruption of Public Officers
b. Adultery
c. Rape (People v. Clopino 1998)
d. Theft and Robbery (Valenzula vs People 2007)
WHEN FELONIES ARE RULE — All felonies are punishable, in whatever stage of criminal execution (Art. 6)
PUNISHABLE (AS TO THE ‣ EXCEPT — Light felonies are punishable only when they have been consummated (Art. 7)
STAGE OF EXECUTION) ‣ EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION — Light felonies committed against person or property are punishable in
(ART. 6, 7) whatever stage (Art. 7)
CONSPIRACY AND RULE — Conspiracy and proposal to commit felony are NOT punishable
PROPOSAL TO COMMIT ‣ EXCEPT — They are punishable only in the cases in which the law specially provides a penalty therefor
FELONIES
(ART. 8)
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
EXISTENCE OF A TEST — Whether the acts of the offenders show unity in design and common purpose aimed at the
CONSPIRACY attainment of the same object, to commit a particular crime
RULE OF COLLECTIVE RULE — When conspiracy is established, all who participated therein, irrespective of the quantity and
CRIMINAL LIABILITY quality of his participation is liable equally and collectively for the all acts committed by the co- conspirators.
The act of one is the act of all.
‣ EXCEPT — When only one or some of the conspirators committed another crime, which is not part of
the intended crime, only they are liable for such acts.
‣ EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION — In the following cases, even if the crime committed was not part of the
intended conspiracy, all the co-conspirators are liable —
1. When the other crime was committed in their presence and they did not prevent its commission
indicating their approval thereof
2. When the other crime is the natural consequence of the crime planned
SIGNIFICANCE OF ‣ The classification into grave, less grave or light is important to determine —
CLASSIFYING FELONIES AS 1. Whether a complex crime was committed, which requires grave or less grave felonies (Art. 48)
TO GRAVITY
2. The duration of the subsidiary penalty to be imposed (Art. 39, No. 2)
3. The duration of the detention in case of failure to post bond to keep the peace (Art. 35)
4. Whether the crime has prescribed (Art. 90)
5. Whether or not there is delay in the delivery of detained persons to the judicial authority (Art. 125)
6. The proper penalty for quasi-offenses (Art. 365)
3. Suspension
4. Destierro
4. MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES Court can take them into consideration in the award
Reduces criminal liability
(ART. 13) of damages
1. JUSTIFYING 1. Self-defense
CIRCUMSTANCES 2. Defense of relatives
(ART. 11) 3. Defense of strangers
4. State of necessity or the avoidance of a greater evil
5. Performance of duty or lawful exercise of a right
6. Obedience to lawful order of superior
2. EXEMPTING 1. Imbecility/Insanity
CIRCUMSTANCES 2. Minority (as amended by RA 9344, April 23, 2006)
(ART. 12) 3. Accident
4. Compulsion of an irresistible force
5. Impulse of an uncontrollable fear
6. Insuperable or lawful cause
3. ABSOLUTORY 1. Spontaneous desistance in the attempted stage unless the overt act committed already constitutes a crime other
CIRCUMSTANCES than that intended (Art. 6, par. 3)
2. Attempted or frustrated light felonies except those against persons or property (Art. 7)
3. Accessories in light felonies (Art. 16)
4. Certain relatives who are accessories subject to the requisites provided (Art. 20)
5. Death and physical injuries inflicted under exceptional circumstances (Art. 247)
6. In trespass, a person is not liable if he entered another’s dwelling for the purpose of preventing some serious harm
to himself, the occupants of the dwelling or a third person, nor shall it be applicable to any person who shall enter a
dwelling for the purpose of rendering some service to humanity or justice, nor to anyone who shall enter cafes,
taverns, inns, and other public places (Art. 280)
7. Certain relatives in theft, estafa, and malicious mischief (Art. 332)
8. Marriage of the offender with the offended party in cases of seduction, abduction, and acts of lasciviousness (Art.
344, par. 4)
MODIFYING SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES
CIRCUMSTANCE
9. Instigation
10. Battered woman syndrome (RA 9262, Sec. 26)
11. Status offenses in Sec. 57 and 58, RA 9344
12. Mistake of fact
13. Repeal of a law, either absolute or modification of the penalty when favourable to the offender
1. Art. 68 (as amended by RA 9344) — Minors over 15 and under 18 years of age who acted with discernment
2. Art. 69 — If the deed is not wholly excusable by reason of the lack of some of the conditions required to justify the
same or to exempt form criminal liability, if majority of such conditions are present.
10. Exploitation of Children for Commission of Crimes (Sec. 20[c] of RA 9344 as amended by RA 10630)
11. Use of an loose firearm in the commission of a felony (Sec. 29, RA 10591)
12. Committing a crime under the influence of dangerous drugs (Sec. 25, RA 9165)
13. Committing a crime through and with the use of information and communications technologies (Sec. 6, RA 10175)
6. ALTERNATIVE 1. Relationship
CIRCUMSTANCES (ART. 2. Intoxication
15)
3. Degree of instruction and education of the offender
JUSTYFING CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
JUSTIFYING When the offender acts in accordance with justifying circumstances, he incurs no criminal liability and no
CIRCUMSTANCES civil liability ex delicto. Justifying Circumstances are those where the act of a person is said to be in
(ART. 11) accordance with law, so that such person is deemed not to have transgressed the law and is free from
both criminal and civil liability. There is no crime, thus, there is no criminal. Generally, there is no civil
liability ex delicto, except in par. 4 where the civil liability is borne by the persons benefited by the act
SELF-DEFENSE 1. Unlawful aggression on the part of the victim against the accused’s person or rights
(ART. 11[1]) 2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed by the accused to prevent and repel it
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself
DEFENSE OF RELATIVES 1. There is unlawful aggression against the person or rights of relatives of the accused (spouse,
(ART. 11[2]) ascendants, descendants, or legitimate, natural or adopted brothers or sisters, or his relatives by
affinity in the same degrees and those consanguinity within the fourth civil degree)
2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed by the accused to prevent and repel it
3. In case provocation was given by the person attacked, the one making defense had no part therein
DEFENSE OF STRANGERS 1. There is unlawful aggression against the person or rights of a person who is a stranger to the accused
(ART. 11[3]) 2. Reasonable necessity of the means employed by the accused to prevent and repel it
3. The person defending be not induced by revenge, resentment, or other evil motive
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
STATE OF NECESSITY OR 1. The accused does an act which causes damage to another in order to avoid an evil or injury which
AVOIDANCE OF GREATER actually exists, and is not brought about by the accused’s own acts
EVIL 2. The injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it
(ART. 11[4]) 3. There is no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it
PERFORMANCE OF DUTY OR 1. That the accused acted in the performance of a duty or in the lawful exercise of a right or office
LAWFUL EXERCISE OF A
2. That the injury caused or the offend committed be a necessary consequence of the due performance
RIGHT
(ART. 11[5])
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
EXEMPTING When the offender acts in accordance with exempting circumstances during the commission of the felony,
CIRCUMSTANCES he is exempt from criminal liability but NOT the civil liability ex delicto. Exempting circumstances are those
(ART. 12) by virtue of which, although the act is criminal, the law exempts the actor from liability. A crime is
committed, but circumstances pertaining the the offender calls for his exemption from criminal liability.
There is a crime and a criminal, but he is exempt from criminal liability. Generally, there is civil liability ex
delicto, except in accident and insuperable cause Art. 12(4,7), which strictly are not criminal
IMBECILITY AND INSANITY Persons who are completely deprived of intelligence, reason and discernment during the commission of
(ART. 12[1]) the offense
MINORITY Minors in the following ages during the commission of the offense:
(ART. 12[2,3], AS AMENDED 1. Minors 15 years old or under (until 15th birthday)
BY SEC. 6, RA 9344) 2. Minors over 15 (15 years and 1 day) and under 18 (until the day before 18th birthday) who did NOT act
with discernment
IMPULSE OF AN 1. There is a threat which causes an uncontrollable fear of an evil greater than or at least equal to, that
UNCONTROLLABLE FEAR which he is required to commit
(ART. 12[6]) 2. The threat promises an evil of such gravity and imminence that the ordinary man would have
succumbed to it.
JUSTIFYING EXEMPTING
The act is legal, within the bounds of law The act is criminal
JUSTIFYING EXEMPTING
Since there is no crime, there is no criminal and civil liability ex There is a crime, there is a criminal, but no criminal liability. While he
delicto, except in state of necessity is exempt from criminal liability, there is a civil liability ex delicto,
except in accident and insuperable or lawful cause.
The emphasis of the law is on the act The emphasis of the law is on the actor
ABSOLUTORY CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
ABSOLUTORY Absolutory causes are those where the act committed is a crime but for reasons of public policy and
CIRCUMSTANCES sentiment, there is no penalty imposed. These refer to justifying and exempting circumstances outside of
Art. 11 and 12
BATTERED WOMAN An accused suffering from battered woman syndrome, at the time of the commission of the crime, do not
SYNDROME incur any criminal and civil liability. This is despite the absence of any of the elements for justifying
(RA 9262, PEOPLE VS circumstances of self-defense under the RPC. In the determination of the state of mind of the woman who
GENOSA) was suffering from battered woman syndrome at the time of the commission of the crime, the courts shall
be assisted by expert psychiatrists/ psychologists. (Sec. 26, VAWC [RA 9262])
The battered woman syndrome is characterized by the so-called "cycle of violence,”which has three
phases —
1. The tension-building phase
2. The acute battering incident
3. The tranquil, loving (or, at least, nonviolent) phase (People vs Genosa)
DEATH AND PHYSICAL 1. Any legally married person who having surprised his spouse in the act of committing sexual
INJURIES INFLICTED UNDER intercourse with another person, shall kill any of them or both of them in the act or immediately
EXCEPTIONAL thereafter, or shall inflict upon them any serious physical injury, shall suffer the penalty of destierro.
CIRCUMSTANCES 2. If he shall inflict upon them physical injuries of any other kind, he shall be exempt from punishment.
(ART. 247, PEOPLE VS 3. These rules shall be applicable, under the same circumstances, to parents with respect to their
ABARCA) daughters under eighteen years of age, and their seducer, while the daughters are living with their
parents.
4. Any person who shall promote or facilitate the prostitution of his wife or daughter, or shall otherwise
have consented to the infidelity of the other spouse shall not be entitled to the benefits of this article.
Article 247, or the exceptional circumstances mentioned therein, amounts to an exempting circumstance,
for even where death or serious physical injuries is inflicted, the penalty is so greatly lowered as to result to
no punishment at all. (People vs Abarca)
STATUS OFFENSES AND 1. Any conduct not considered an offense or not penalized if committed by an adult shall not be
OFFENSES NOT APPLICABLE considered an offense and shall not be punished if committed by a child.
TO CHILDREN 2. Ordinances enacted by local governments concerning juvenile status offenses such as, but not limited
(SEC. 57, 57-A, 58, RA to, curfew violations, truancy, parental disobedience, anti-smoking and anti-drinking laws, as well as
9344) light offenses and misdemeanors against public order or safety such as, but not limited to, disorderly
conduct, public scandal, harassment, drunkenness, public intoxication, criminal nuisance, vandalism,
gambling, mendicancy, littering, public urination, and trespassing, shall be for the protection of
children. No penalty shall be imposed on children for said violations, and they shall instead be brought to
their residence or to any barangay official at the barangay hall to be released to the custody of their
parents.
3. Persons below eighteen (18) years of age shall be exempt from prosecution for the crime of vagrancy
and prostitution under Section 202 of the Revised Penal Code, of mendicancy under Presidential Decree
No. 1563, and sniffing of rugby under Presidential Decree No. 1619
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
MARRIAGE OF THE In cases of seduction, abduction, and acts of lasciviousness, the marriage of the offender with the offended
OFFENDER AND THE party shall extinguish the criminal action or remit the penalty already imposed upon him. The provisions of
OFFENDED PARTY IN this paragraph shall also be applicable to the co-principals, accomplices and accessories after the fact of the
CERTAIN CRIMES AGAINST above- mentioned crimes.
CHASTITY
(ART. 344)
ENTRAPMENT VS INSTIGATION
ENTRAPMENT INSTIGATION
The mens rea originated from the accused who was merely
The evil idea originated from the peace officer who induced the
trapped by the peace officer in flagrante delicto (caught in the
accused to commit the act
act)
This is not absolutely as to the offender as he authored the evil Absolutely by reason of public policy
idea
Trap for the unwary criminal Trap for the unwary innocent
The peace officer has no criminal liability for his acts are in The peace officer is a principal by inducement
accordance with law
The crime has already been committed The crime would not and could not have been committed were it
not for the instigation
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
MITIGATING RULE — When the offender acts in accordance with mitigating circumstances during the commission of
CIRCUMSTANCES the felony, his criminal liability is reduced
(ART. 13, 68, 69, 64)
RULES IN THE APPLICATION ‣ Mitigating or aggravating circumstances which arise from the following shall only serve to mitigate or
AND APPRECIATION OF aggravant the liability of the principals, accomplices and accessories as to whom such
MITIGATING AND circumstances are attendant —
AGGRAVATING
1. Moral attributes of the offender
CIRCUMSTANCES
(ART. 62[3,4] 2. From his private relations with the offended party, or
3. From any other personal cause (Art. 62 [3])
‣ The circumstances which consist in the following shall serve to aggravate or mitigate the liability of
those persons only who had knowledge of them at the time of the execution of the act or their
cooperation therein —
1. Material execution of the act, or
2. In the means employed to accomplish it (Art. 62 [4])
ORDINARY MITIGATING ‣ These are those enumerated under Art. 13 (except minority under paragraph 2 which was repealed
CIRCUMSTANCES and modified by RA 9344) —
(ART. 13)
1. Incomplete justifying or exempting circumstances
2. Senility (over 70 years of age)
3. Praeter intentionem
4. Sufficient provocation
5. Immediate vindication of a grave offense
6. Passion and obfuscation
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
7. Voluntary surrender
8. Voluntary plea of guilt
9. Physical defects
10. Illness diminishing the exercise of will-power
11. Analogous circumstances
EFFECT OF ORDINARY RULE — The present of one ordinary mitigating circumstance results in lowering the penalty to the
MITIGATING minimum period
CIRCUMSTANCES ‣ EXCEPT — They are not considered when what is prescribed is a single indivisible penalty. There are
(ART. 63, 64) only two indivisible penalties — death and reclusion perpetua (but note that RA 9346 banned the
imposition of the death penalty) (Art. 63)
‣ BUT — when there are two ordinary mitigating circumstances with no aggravating circumstance
attendant, the penalty is to lowered by one degree in the proper period, regardless of whether the
penalty is divisible or indivisible (Art. 64[5])
INCOMPLETE JUSTIFYING These are justifying or exempting circumstances when all the requisites necessary to justify or to exempt from
OR EXEMPTING criminal liability in the respective cases are not attendant
CIRCUMSTANCES NOTE — Some circumstances in Art. 12 do not find application as some they don’t have partial
(ART. 13, [1]) application, such as —
1. Insanity/imbecility (but partial insanity may fall under illnesses diminishing the offender’s exercise of
will-power)
2. Compulsion of an Irresistible Force
3. Insuperable or Lawful Case
INCOMPLETE SELF- Unlawful aggression must always be present. Without it, there is nothing to defend, thus there is neither
DEFENSE, DEFENSE OF complete nor incomplete defense. What may be absent is either one or both the last two requisites of —
RELATIVES, DEFENSE (1) reasonable necessity if the means employed and (2) the lack of sufficient provocation (or as the case
OF STRANGER may be under defense of relatives and strangers).
(ART. 13[1]; 11[1,2,3]) 1. Only unlawful aggression is present— ordinary mitigating under Art. 13(1)
2. Unlawful aggression and one other requisite is present (majority is present)— privileged mitigating
under Art. 69
3. All requisites are present — justifying circumstance under Art. 11
INCOMPLETE STATE OF The requisite that “That the evil sought to be avoided must actually exist” must always be present What may
NECESSITY be absent are either or both of the last two requisites —
(ART. 13[1],11[4]) 1. That the injury feared be greater than that done to avoid it
2. That there be no other practical and less harmful means of preventing it.
INCOMPLETE OBEDIENCE The requisite that an order has been issued by a superior must always be present What may be absent are
TO ORDER OF SUPERIOR either or both of the last two requisites —
(ART. 13[1],11[6]) 1. That such order must be for some lawful purpose
2. That the means used by the subordinate to carry out said order is lawful and reasonable
INCOMPLETE ACCIDENT The first requisite must always be present, what may be absent is merely that the offender acted without
(ART. 13[1], 12[4]) negligence
1. A person is performing a lawful act
2. He causes injury to another by mere accident
3. The act is performed with due care without fault or intention of causing injury
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
SENILITY The offender must be over 70 years of age when the felony was committed
(ART. 13[2])
PRAETER INTENTIONEM This is when the facts show that there is a notable and evident disproportion between the following —
(ART. 13[3]) 1. The means employed to execute the criminal act
2. The consequences of such acts
VINDICATION OF A GRAVE 1. That there be a grave offense done to the one committing the felony, his spouse, ascendants,
OFFENSE descendants, legitimate natural or adopted brothers or sisters or relatives by affinity within the same
(ART. 13[5]) degrees
2. That the felony is committed in vindication of such grave offense within a reasonable amount of time
PASSION AND 1. The accused acted upon an impulse so powerful that it naturally produced passion or obfuscation in
OBFUSCATION him.
(ART. 13[6]) 2. The impulse arose out of the lawful sentiments of the offender such that it was created by unlawful or
unjust acts by the offended party.
3. Such act must not be far removed from the commission of the crime by a considerable amount of
time, during which the perpetrator might recover his normal equanimity
VOLUNTARY SURRENDER 1. That the offender had not been actually arrested
(ART. 13[7]) 2. That the offender spontaneously and voluntarily surrendered himself because he acknowledges his
guilt or wishes to save the trouble and expenses necessarily incurred in his search and capture.
3. That the surrender was to a person in authority or his agent
4. The surrender must be by reason of the commission of the crime for which the offender is prosecuted
VOLUNTARY PLEA OF 1. That the offender spontaneously confessed his guilt and entered a plea of guilt
GUILT 2. That the confession of guilt was made in open court, before the competent court that is to try the case
(ART. 13[7]) 3. It must be made prior to the presentation of evidence for the prosecution
PHYSICAL DEFECTS 1. That the offender is deaf and dumb, blind or otherwise suffering some physical defect
(ART. 13[8]) 2. Such defect restricts his means of action, defense, or communications with his fellow beings.
3. The defect must relate to the crime committed
ILLNESS DIMINISHING THE 1. That the illness of the offender must diminish the exercise of his will-power
EXERCISE OF WILL-POWER 2. That such illness should not deprive the offender of consciousness of his acts
(ART. 13[9])
ANALOGOUS MITIGATING Any other circumstances of a similar nature and analogous to those above mentioned. Such as —
CIRCUMSTANCES 1. Offender was over 60 years old and with failing sight is analogous to senility
(ART. 13[10])
2. Restitution in malversation of public funds is analogous to voluntary plea of guilty
3. Testifying for the prosecution is analogous to plea of guilty
4. Voluntary restitution of stolen property analogous to voluntary surrender
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
PRIVILEGED MITIGATING RULE — The presence of privilege mitigating circumstances results in lowering the imposable penalty by
CIRCUMSTANCES degrees. These cannot be offset by any aggravating circumstances. They are always considered whether
(ART. 68, 69) the penalty imposable is divisible or indivisible. These are those outside of Art. 13 and is found in Art. 68 and
69 —
1. Art. 68 (as amended by RA 9344) — Minors over 15 and under 18 years of age who acted with
discernment, the penalty next lower than that prescribed by law is imposed, but always in the proper
period
2. Art. 69 — If the deed is not wholly excusable by reason of the lack of some of the conditions
required to justify the same or to exempt from criminal liability, if majority of such conditions are
present. The penalty is lower by one or two degrees, on the court’s discretion
MINORS OVER 15 AND By virtue of RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act, minority is always at least a privileged
UNDER 18 YEARS ACTING mitigating circumstance
WITH D ISCERNMENT 1. Minors below 15 years and below — exempting circumstance
(ART. 68, AS AMENDED BY
2. Minors over 15 years but under 18 acting without discernment — exempting circumstance
RA 9344)
3. Minors over 15 years but under 18 acting with discernment — privileged mitigating under Art. 68
IF THE DEED IS NOT If the deed is not wholly excusable by reason of the lack of some of the conditions required to justify the
WHOLLY EXCUSABLE same or to exempt from criminal liability, if majority of such conditions are present. The penalty is lower by
(ART. 69) one or two degrees
RULE — It is necessary that there be present a majority of the elements of the mitigating circumstance for
Art. 69 to apply.
BUT — When the circumstance only requires two elements, the presence of one is considered a
majority. (People vs Oanis)
SPECIFIC MITIGATING These are found in other provisions and only applicable to specific crimes —
CIRCUMSTANCES
1. Art. 268, par. 3 — Voluntary release of the person illegally detained within 3 days without the offender
attaining his purpose and before the institution of criminal action. The penalty is one degree lower
2. Art 333, par. 3 — Abandonment without justification of the house who committed adultery. The
penalty is one degree lower
3. Art. 255 — Infanticide was committed by the mother of the child or either of the maternal
grandparents for the purpose of concealing her or their dishonor, the penalty is lowered.
AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
AGGRAVATING RULE — When the offender acts in accordance with aggravating circumstances during the commission of
CIRCUMSTANCES the felony, his criminal liability is increased. They may be —
(ART. 14) 1. Generic Aggravating — Circumstances under Art. 14 that apply to all kinds of crimes, These are the
circumstances in Art. 14, par 1, 2, 3 (dwelling), 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 18, 19 and 20 (except by means of
motor vehicles)
2. Specific Aggravating — Circumstances under Art. 14 that apply only to particular kinds of crimes.
These are the circumstances in Art. 14 pertaining to —
a. Insult or in disregard of the respect due the offended party (Art. 14[3]) — applies only to crimes
against persons and crimes against honor
b. Superior strength or weakening of defense (Art. 14[15]) — applies only to crimes against persons
and crimes against property
c. Treachery (Art. 14[15]) — applies only to crimes against persons
d. Ignominy (Art. 14[17])— applies only to crimes against chastity and crimes against persons (but it
has been recognized as aggravating in light and grave coercion and treason)
e. Cruelty (Art. 14[21])— applies only to crimes against chastity and crimes against persons (but it has
been recognized as aggravating in treason)
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
3. Special Aggravating Circumstances — increases the imposable penalty, as the case may be Unlike
generic aggravating circumstances, these CANNOT be offset by ordinary mitigating circumstances.
These circumstance arise because of special conditions
4. Qualifying Aggravating Circumstances — merely serves to change the nature of the crime
5. Inherent Aggravating Circumstances — no effect, these do NOT increase criminal liability or the
penalty
EFFECT OF AGGRAVATING Aggravating Circumstances under Art. 14 — increase the imposable penalty to the maximum period
CIRCUMSTANCES ‣ EXCEPT — They are not considered when what is prescribed is a single indivisible penalty
(ART. 63, 64)
SPECIAL AGGRAVATING 1. Its effect is to increase the criminal liability by increasing imposable penalty
CIRCUMSTANCES 2. They cannot be offset by ordinary mitigating circumstances
3. They do not change that nature of the offense
These are the circumstances These are circumstances in the RPC These are circumstances These may be circumstances
enumerated under Art. 14 or provided for in special laws which in the RPC or provided —
change the nature of the crime for in special laws which
1. Which is an integral
committed increase the penalty element in a crime
imposed
2. Inherent in the crime
3. Inherent in other
aggravating
circumstances
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
IN CONTEMPT OR WITH 1. The crime was committed in the presence of public authority
INSULT TO THE PUBLIC 2. The public authority is engaged in the exercise of his functions
AUTHORITIES 3. The public authority’s presence has not prevented the offender from committing the act
4. Such public authority is not the person against whom the crime is committed
(ART. 14[2])
5. The offender has knowledge of the person’s being one of public authority
INSULT OR IN DISREGARD 1. The crime committed is classified as a “crime against persons” or “crimes against honor”
OF THE RESPECT DUE THE 2. The offender must have deliberately intended the insult or disrespect against the offended party’s rank,
OFFENDED PARTY age, or sex
(ART. 14[3])
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
DWELLING OF THE 1. The offended party must be inside his dwelling when the crime was committed
OFFENDED PARTY 2. The offended party must NOT have given sufficient and immediate provocation
(ART. 14[3]) 3. The offender must NOT reside in the same dwelling as the offended party
ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE 1. The offended party had trusted or placed confidence in the offender
(ART. 14[4]) 2. The offender abused such trust and such abuse of confidence facilitated the commission of the crime
CRIME COMMITTED IN THE 1. The crime must be committed in either of the following places —
PALACE OF THE CHIEF i. Palace of the Chief Executive
EXECUTIVE OR IN HIS ii. Presence of the Chief Executive
PRESENCE, OR WHERE
PUBLIC AUTHORITIES ARE
iii. Place where public authorities are engaged in the discharge of their duties
ENGAGED IN THE iv. Place dedicated to religious worship
DISCHARGE OF THEIR 2. The offender must have the intention to commit the crime when he entered the place (People vs
DUTIES, OR IN A PLACE Jaurigue)
DEDICATED TO RELIGIOUS
WORSHIP (ART. 14[5])
BAND 1. The crime was committed by a band (at least 4 armed malefactors acting together in the commission of
(ART. 14[6]) the offense)
2. It must have facilitated the commission of the crime
3. It must be especially sought and taken advantage for by the offender to insure the commission of the
crime or for the purpose of impunity
CONFLAGRATION, 1. The crime was committed on the occasion of either of the following —
SHIPWRECK, EARTHQUAKE, i. Conflagration (fire)
EPIDEMIC OR OTHER ii. Shipwreck
iii. Earthquake
CALAMITY OR MISFORTUNE
iv. Epidemic
(ART. 14[7]) v. Other calamity or misfortune — this must be of a similar nature to the first four circumstances
ejusdem generis
2. The offender must have taken advantage of the calamity or misfortune
AID OF ARMED MEN OR 1. That armed men took part, directly or indirectly, in the commission of the crime
PERSONS WHO INSURE OR 2. That the accused availed himself of their aid and relied upon them when the crime was committed
AFFORD IMPUNITY (ART.
or relied upon them to insure or afford impunity
14[8]) 3. Such armed men were NOT in conspiracy with the accused
ARTIFICE INVOLVING GREAT 1. The offender commits the crime by means of either of the following —
WASTE AND RUIN i. Inundation (flooding)
(ART. 14[12])
ii. Fire
iii. Poison
iv. Explosion
v. Stranding of a vessel or international damage thereto
vi. Derailment of a locomotive
vii. By the use of any other artifice involving great waste and ruin
2. Such circumstance does NOT qualify the offense to another crime
EVIDENT PREMEDITATION 1. The time when the offender determined to commit the crime must be proven and established
(ART. 14[13]) 2. Acts manifestly indicating that the culprit has clung to his determination
3. A sufficient lapse of time between the determination and execution, to allow him to reflect upon the
consequences of his act and to allow his conscience to overcome the resolution of his will
CRAFT, FRAUD OR DISGUISE This applies when any of the following means is employed in the commission of the crime —
(ART. 14[14]) 1. Craft — involves intellectual trickery and cunning on the part of the accused. It is usually done in
order not to arouse the suspicion of the victim.
2. Fraud — insidious words or machinations used to induce the victim to act in a manner which would
enable the offender to carry out his design
3. Disguise — resorting to any device for the purpose of enabling the offender to conceal his identity
SUPERIOR STRENGTH OR 1. This aggravating circumstance applies only to crimes against persons and property (Reyes)
WEAKENING OF DEFENSE 2. Advantage of superior strength — means to use purposely excessive force out of proportion to the
(ART. 14[15]) means of defense available to the person attacked. The offender must deliberately take advantage of
his superior strength
UNLAWFUL ENTRY This is appreciated when a crime is committed after the offender unlawfully enters into a building or
(ART. 14[18]) structure by a way not intended for the purpose
BROKEN WALL, ROOF, This is appreciated when the offender breaks a wall, roof, floor, door, or window or parts thereof as a
FLOOR, DOOR, OR WINDOW means to the commission of a crime
(ART. 14[19])
MOTOR VEHICLES This is appreciated when the offender employs the use of motor vehicles, motorized watercraft, airships, or other
(ART. 14[20]) motorized means of transportation as a means to commission of the crime
(can be offset by ordinary mitigating circumstances) (cannot be offset by ordinary mitigating circumstances)
Increases the imposable penalty to the maximum period Another additional, distinct and separate Increases the
penalty is to be imposed upon the habitual imposable penalty to
delinquent the maximum period
1. That the offender on trial 1. The accused is on trial 1. That the offender had been convicted 1. The offender
for a subsequent felony for a new offense of any of following the crimes of — (a) commits a
serious or less serious physical subsequent
2. That he was previously 2. That he previously
injuries, (b) robbery, (c) theft, (d) felony after
convicted by final served sentence for
either following — estafa, (e) falsification conviction by
judgment of another
felony final judgment of
a. An offense to which the 2. That after conviction or after serving
the prior felony
law attaches an equal or his sentence, he again committed,
3. The previous conviction
greater sentence than and within 10 years from his last 2. The subsequent
by final judgment was for
that attached for the new release or first conviction, he was felony was
a felony committed
offense again convicted of any of the said committed
PRIOR to the felony he is
crimes for the second time. before beginning
currently being charged
b. Two offenses to which to serve
and tried 3. That after his conviction of, or after
the law attaches with sentence or
lighter sentences than serving his sentence for the second
4. That both the first and while serving
the second offences are that attached for the new offense, he again committed, and
sentence for the
embraced in the same offense within 10 years from his last release or
prior felony
title of the RPC last conviction, he was again
convicted of any of the said crimes for
the third time of oftener
SPECIAL AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
TAKING ADVANTAGE OF There must be an intimate connection between the offense and the office of the accused. Not aggravating
PUBLIC POSITION when it is an integral element or inherent in the offense
(ART. 62[1A] AS AMENDED TEST — Did the accused abuse his office in order to commit the crime?
BY RA 7659)
ORGANIZED OR Organized/syndicated crime group — means a group of 2 or more persons collaborating, confederating or
SYNDICATED CRIME GROUP mutually helping one another for purposes of gain in the commission of any crime.
(ART. 62[1A] AS AMENDED
BY RA 7659)
MULTI-RECIDIVISM OR 1. That the offender had been convicted of any of the following crimes (FRETSL) —
HABITUAL DELINQUENCY i. Falsification
(ART. 62[5]) ii. Robbery
iii. Estafa
iv. Theft
v. Serious or less serious physical injuries
2. That after conviction or after serving his sentence, he again committed, and within 10 years from his
last release or first conviction, he was again convicted of any of the said crimes for the second time.
3. That after his conviction or after serving his sentence for the second offense, he again committed, and
within 10 years from his last release or last conviction, he was again convicted of any of the said crimes for
the third time of oftener
QUASI-RECIDIVISM Any person who shall commit a felony after having been convicted by final judgment, before beginning to serve
(ART. 160) such sentence, or while serving the same, shall be punished by the maximum period of the penalty prescribed
by law for the new felony.
ERROR IN PERSONAE 1. The crime committed is one involving error in personae, NOT to aberratio ictus (where Art. 48 applies)
(ART. 49) or praeter intentionem (where Art. 4 and 13[3] applies)
2. It only applies when the intended crime and the crime actually committed are punished with different
penalties
USE OF AN LOOSE FIREARM Loose firearm — refers to either any of the following—
IN THE COMMISSION OF A 1. Unregistered firearm
FELONY 2. Obliterated or altered firearm
(SEC. 29, RA 10591) 3. Firearm which has been lost or stolen
4. Illegally manufactured firearms
5. Registered firearms in the possession of an individual other than the licensee and those with revoked
licenses in accordance with the rules and regulations
RULE — The use of a loose firearm, when inherent in the commission of a crime punishable under the RPC
or special laws, shall be considered as an aggravating circumstance increasing the penalty to its maximum
period
‣ EXCEPT— In the following cases, the effect is different —
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
1. If the crime committed with the use of a loose firearm has maximum penalty which is lower than
that the penalty for illegal possession of firearm — the penalty for illegal possession of firearm shall
be imposed in lieu of the penalty for the crime charged
2. If the crime committed with the use of a loose firearm is penalized by the law with a maximum
penalty which is equal to penalty for illegal possession of firearm — the penalty of prision mayor in
its minimum period shall be imposed in addition to the penalty for the crime punishable under the RPC
or special laws.
3. If the crime committed with the use of a loose firearm is in furtherance of, or incident to, or in
connection with the crime of rebellion of insurrection, or attempted coup d’ etat — such violation
shall be absorbed as an element of the crime of rebellion or insurrection, or attempted coup d’ etat.
4. If the crime is committed by the person without using the loose firearm — the violation shall be
considered as a distinct and separate offense.
COMMITTING A CRIME A positive finding for the use of dangerous drugs shall be a qualifying aggravating circumstance in the
UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF commission of a crime by an offender, and the application of the penalty provided for in the Revised Penal
DANGEROUS DRUGS Code shall be applicable.
(SEC. 25, RA 9165)
COMMITTING A CRIME All crimes defined and penalized by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and special laws, if committed
THROUGH AND WITH THE by, through and with the use of information and communications technologies shall be covered by the
USE OF INFORMATION AND relevant provisions of this Act: Provided, That the penalty to be imposed shall be one (1) degree higher than
COMMUNICATIONS that provided for by the Revised Penal Code, as amended, and special laws, as the case may be.
TECHNOLOGIES
(SEC. 6, RA 10175)
ALTERNATIVE CIRCUMSTANCES
CONCEPT
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
ALTERNATIVE RULE — When the offender acts in accordance with alternative circumstances during the commission of
CIRCUMSTANCES the felony, his criminal liability is decreased or increased, as the case may be
(ART. 15)
RELATIONSHIP This is when the offended party is either any of the following of the offender —
(ART. 15) 1. Spouse
2. Ascendant
3. Descendant
4. Legitimate, natural or adopted brother or sister
5. Relative by affinity in the same degrees as those above-mentioned
INTOXICATION Intoxication means that at the time of the commission of the crime, the offender has taken such quantity of
(ART. 15) alcoholic drinks as to blur his reason and deprive him of a certain degree of control. The offender’s mental
faculties must be affected by his drunkenness.
1. AGGRAVATING — In the following cases —
i. Intoxication is habitual
ii. If it is intentional or subsequent to the plan to commit a felony (meaning the offender purposely
drank alcohol as a stimulant to commit the crime)
2. MITIGATING — In the following cases —
i. Intoxication is NOT habitual
ii. Intoxication is NOT subsequent to the plan to commit the felony
CONCEPT NOTES/ELEMENTS
DEGREE OF INSTRUCTION 1. AGGRAVATING — High degree of instruction. But the offender must deliberately take advantage of his
(ART. 15) learning in committing the crime
2. MITIGATING — Low degree of instruction. This is when the offender has the lack of sufficient
intelligence and knowledge of the full significance of his acts
‣ EXCEPT — in the following cases, the low degree of instruction is NOT mitigating —
i. Crimes against property (such as — theft, robbery, arson, estafa)
ii. Crimes against chastity
iii. Treason — because love for country should be a natural feeling of every citizen
iv. Homicide or Murder
v. Rape (Molesa vs Director of Prisons 1934)
‣ They are persons who They are persons who 1. They have knowledge of the commission of the crime but did not
either — are not principals but participated therein either as principals or accomplices
1. Take a direct part in the cooperate in the 2. They merely take part subsequent to its commission in any of the
execution of the act execution of the following manners —
offense by previous or
2. Directly force or simultaneous acts a. By profiting themselves or assisting the offender to profit by the
induce others to effects of the crime
commit it
b. By concealing or destroying the body of the crime, or the effects or
3. Cooperate in the instruments thereof, in order to prevent its discovery
commission of the
c. By harboring, concealing, or assisting in the escape of the principals
offense by another act
of the crime, provided the accessory either —
without which it would
not have been i. Acts with abuse of his public functions, or
accomplished ii. Whenever the author of the crime is guilty of any of the ff. —
(1) Treason
(2) Parricide
(3) Murder
(4) Attempt to take the life of the Chief Executive
(5) Known to be habitually guilty of some other crime
KINDS OF PARDON
As to the Crime Can extend to any crime Applies only to the following crimes —
Covered
EXCEPT — 1. Adultery (Art. 344)
As to the Effect Cannot affect the civil liability ex Offended party can waive the civil liability
on Civil Liability delicto
When Granted Can only be granted upon conviction Can be granted before or after the institution of the criminal action
by final judgment
To Whom it Benefits only the grantee of the The pardon benefits all the principals, accomplices and accessories to the
Benefits pardon crime
EXCEPT —
PENALTY DURATION
PLURALITY OF CRIMES
1. That only a single act is performed by 1. That at least two offenses are 1. There are a series of acts
the offender committed (regardless of the period of time over
which it occurred)
2. That the single act produces — 2. That one or some of the offenses
must be necessary to commit the 2. Such acts arise out of a singular
a. Two or more grave felonies
other criminal purpose and resolution to
b. One or more grave and one or attain a definite objective
more less grave felonies 3. That both or all the offenses must be
punished under the same statute 3. All of such acts violates the same
c. Two or more less grave felonies criminal offense as defined
Penalty for the most serious crime shall be imposed in its maximum period Only one penalty is imposed despite the
number of acts performed
PENALTY
PENALTY PRESCRIBED
PRESCRIBED BY
BY LAW PENALTY NEXT LOWER IN APPLICATION
LAW DEGREE
Single and indivisible That immediately following that If penalty prescribed is — death
indivisible penalty in the
(Art. 61[1]) The penalty next lower in degree is — reclusion perpetua
graduated scales
If penalty prescribed is — reclusion perpetua
Two indivisible penalties Penalty next lower in degree is If penalty prescribed is — reclusion perpetua to death
that immediately following the
(Art. 61[2]) The penalty next lower in degree is — reclusion temporal
lesser of the penalties
prescribed in the scales
Two indivisible penalties and the If penalty prescribed is — reclusion temporal in its
maximum period of another maximum period to death
divisible penalty
The penalty next lower in degree is — prision mayor in its
Penalty next lower in degree
(Art. 61[3]) maximum period to reclusion temporal in its medium
shall be composed of the
period
medium and minimum periods
of the proper divisible penalty
PENALTY PRESCRIBED BY LAW PENALTY NEXT LOWER IN APPLICATION
DEGREE
3 periods corresponding to Penalty next lower in degree is If penalty prescribed is — prision mayor in its medium
Different Divisible Penalties the penalty consisting in 3 period to reclusion temporal in its minimum period
periods down the scale
(Art. 61[4]) The penalty next lower in degree is — prision correccional
in its medium period to prision mayor in its minimum
REYES — “several periods” in Art.
period
61[4] means 3 periods
2 periods Penalty next lower in degree is If penalty prescribed is — prision mayor in its medium
the penalty consisting in 2 period to maximum period
(Art. 61[5])
periods down the scale
The penalty next lower in degree is — prision correccional
in its maximum period to prision mayor in its minimum
period
1 period Penalty next lower in degree is If penalty prescribed is — arresto mayor in its maximum
the penalty consisting in 1 period
(Art. 61[5])
period down the scale
The penalty next lower in degree is — arresto mayor in its
minimum period
MAXIMUM That which could be properly imposed under the RPC, Must not exceed the maximum
TERM considering the aggravating and mitigating circumstances. term fixed by said law
MINIMUM TERM Within the range of the penalty 1 degree lower than that Must not be less than the
prescribed by the RPC without considering the mitigating or minimum term fixed by said law
aggravating circumstances
BUT — When there is a privileged mitigating circumstance, so
that the penalty has to be lowered, the starting point for
determining the minimum term of the indeterminate penalty
should consider the effect of the privilege mitigating
circumstance.
COMPARISON — DISQUALIFICATIONS UNDER THE PROBATION LAW VS ISL
OFFENSE 1. One of the crimes against national security 1. Treason (including conspiracy or proposal to commit the
INVOLVED same)
2. Drug-trafficking or drug pushing (Sec. 24,
RA 9165) 2. Misprision of treason
3. Offenses under the Omnibus Election 3. Rebellion
Code (Sec. 264, BP 881)
4. Sedition
5. Espionage
6. Piracy
OTHERS 1. When offender files an appeal (except if a 1. When offender granted a conditional pardon by the
non-probationable penalty was initially President but violated the terms thereof
imposed and was modified to a
2. When offender is a habitual delinquent
probationable penalty on appeal)
3. When offender escaped from confinement or evaded
2. When offender was previously placed on sentence
probation
1. Death, reclusion perpetua or 1. Offenses punished only by a fine 1. Death and reclusion perpetua —
reclusion temporal — 20 years or by imprisonment for not more 20 years
2. Other afflictive penalties — 15 than 1 month, or both — 1 year
2. Other afflictive penalties — 15
years 2. Offenses punished by years
3. Correctional penalties (except imprisonment for more than 1
month, but less than 2 years — 4 3. Correctional penalties — 10
arresto mayor) — 10 years years
years
4. Penalty is arresto mayor — 5
3. Offenses punished by 4. Arresto mayor —5 years
years
imprisonment for 2 years or 5. Light penalties — 1 year
5. Libel and other similar offenses more, but less than 6 years — 8
— 1 year years
6. Oral defamation and slander by
4. Offences punished by
deed — 6 months
imprisonment for 6 years or
7. Light penalties — 2 months more — 12 years
5. Treason — 20 years
6. Violations penalized by
municipal ordinances — 2
months
TITLE 1 — CRIMES AGAINST NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE LAW OF NATIONS
CRIME ELEMENTS
CONSPIRACY TO 1. ACT — Two or more persons come to an agreement to levy war against the government or to adhere to the
COMMIT TREASON enemies and to given them aid or comfort, and decide to commit it
(ART. 115) 2. WHEN — Time of war
PROPOSAL TO COMMIT 1. ACT —A person who has decided to commit treasonous acts, proposes its execution to some other person
TREASON or persons
(ART. 115) 2. WHEN — Time of war
QUALIFYING (WHY) — If notice of information be given thereby which might be useful to the enemy and the
offender intended to aid the enemy by giving such notice or information. (Qualified to Treason)
QUALIFYING [3] —
1. HOW — Whenever the offenders have seized the vessel by boarding or firing upon the same
2. WHEN — Whenever the pirates have abandoned their victims without means of saving themselves
3. WHEN — When ANY other crimes are committed as a result of, or on occasion of, the piracy
‣ NOTE — If the offenders committing piracy and mutiny sow and create a condition of widespread and
extraordinary fear and panic among the populace, in order to coerce the government to give in to an
unlawful demand, they are also liable for Terrorism under RA 9372.
QUALIFYING (WHEN) [3] — The penalty is increased whenever the offender either—
1. Fires upon the pilot, member of the crew or passenger of the aircraft
2. Causes attempts to cause the explosion of any bomb or explosive to destroy the aircraft
3. The crime is accompanied by murder, homicide, serious physical injuries or rape
WHO Persons must be a stranger to the vessel. Any person including a passenger or member of
They must not be members of the the complement
complement or passengers
ACT Same
QUALIFYING Same, except that in Art. 122, the enumeration of crimes accompanying the Piracy is limited to
murder, homicide, physical injuries, or rape. In PD 532, it may comprehend any other crime
TITLE 2 — CRIMES AGAINST THE FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE STATE
CRIME ELEMENTS
Arbitrary Detention by Delay in the Delivery of Detained Persons to the Proper Judicial Authorities
1. WHO — Public officer or employee
2. WHEN — That he has arrested and detained a person for some legal ground without a warrant
3. ACT — He fails to deliver such person to the proper judicial authorities within the following periods —
a. 12 hours — for crimes punishable by light penalties or their equivalent
b. 18 hours — for crimes punishable by correctional penalties or their equivalent
c. 36 hours — for crimes punishable by afflictive or capital penalties or their equivalent
ANTI-WIRETAPPING 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, not being authorized by all the parties to any private communication or
ACT spoken word —
(SEC. 1,2, RA 4200) a. To tap any wire or cable, or
b. By using any other device or arrangement, to secretly overhear, intercept, or record such
communication or spoken word by using a device commonly known as a dictaphone or dictagraph or
dictaphone or walkie-talkie or tape-recorder, or however otherwise described.
2. It shall also be unlawful for any person, be he a participant or not in the act or acts penalized in the next
preceding sentence to—
a. Knowingly possess any tape record,wire record,disc record,or any other such record, or copies
thereof, of any communication or spoken word secured either before or after the effective date of this
Act in the manner prohibited by this law; or
b. Replay the same for any other person or persons; or
c. Communicate the contents thereof, either verbally or in writing; or
d. Furnish transcriptions thereof, whether complete or partial, to any other person.
3. Any person who wilfully or knowingly does or who shall aid, permit, or cause to be done any of the acts
declared to be unlawful in the preceding section or who violates the provisions of the following section or
of any order issued thereunder, or aids, permits, or cause such violation
PROHIBITION, 1. WHO — Public officer or employee who is not part of the meeting
INTERRUPTION, AND 2. ACT [3] — The offender either —
DISSOLUTION OF a. Prohibits, interrupts, or dissolves without legal ground, the holding of a peaceful meeting (not by a
municipal council)
PEACEFUL MEETINGS
b. Hinders any person from joining any lawful association or from attending any of its meetings
(ART. 131)
c. Prohibits or hinders any person from addressing, either alone or together with others, any petition to the
authorities for the correction of abuses or redress of grievances
ACTS PUNISHABLE UNDER ART. 128 — VIOLATION OF DOMICILE WITHOUT SEARCH WARRANT
HOW ENTRANCE Entry here must be against Entry here presupposes either a Entry here presupposes a
WAS MADE the will of the owner, which is prior admittance to the domicile/ surreptitious entry by the
made either expressly or residence by the owner or an entry offender, means that the
impliedly as when the door is without the knowledge of the entry is only without the
closed even if it is unlocked owner consent
PUNISHABLE ACT Entering any dwelling against Searcing papers or other effects in Refusal of the offender to
the will of the owner the domicile without the previous leave the premises when
consent of the owner required to do so by the
owner
TITLE 3 — CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER
ELEMENTS
INCITING TO REBELLION 1. WHO — Offender who does not take arms or is not in open hostility against the government
(ART. 138) 2. ACT — He incites others to the execution of any of the acts of rebellion (he incites others to rise publicly
or take up arms against the government to achieve the purposes of rebellion)
3. HOW — Inciting is done by means of speeches, proclamations, writings, emblems, banners, or other
representations tending to the same end
social class
d. To despoil, for any political or social end, any person, municipality, or province, or the National
government of all its property or any part thereof.
CONSPIRACY TO ACT — When two or more persons come to an agreement and a decision to attain an object of sedition and to
COMMIT SEDITION rise publicly and tumultuously
(ART. 141)
duties —
i. Teachers and Professors
ii. Persons charged with the supervision of schools
iii. Lawyers
2. Agents of Persons in Authority
a. Any person who, by direct provision of law or by election or by appointment by competent authority, is
charged with the maintenance of public order and the protection and security of life and property
DIRECT ASSAULTS Without public uprising, by employing force or intimidation for the attainment of any of the purposes
(ART. 148) enumerated in defining the crimes of rebellion and sedition
1. WHEN — That there is no public uprising
2. ACT — Offender commits any act to attain any of the purposes of the crime of Rebellion or Sedition
3. HOW [2] — By either —
a. Force
b. Intimidation
4. WHY [7] — To objective of is to attain any of the purposes of the crime of Rebellion or Sedition —
a. To remove from the allegiance to said Government, the territory of the Philippines or any part thereof, or
any body of island, naval, or other armed forces
b. To deprive the Chief Executive or Congress, wholly or partially of any of their powers or prerogatives
c. Prevent the —
i. Promulgation or execution of any law
ii. Holding of any popular election
iii. National Government or any provincial or municipal government, or any public officer thereof from
freely exercising its or his functions
iv. Execution of any administrative order
d. To inflict any act of hate or revenge upon the person or property of any public officer or employee
e. To commit, for any political or social end, any act of hate or revenge against private persons or any
social class
f. To despoil, for any political or social end, any person, municipality, or province, or the National
government of all its property or any part thereof.
INDIRECT ASSAULTS 1. WHEN — That a person in authority or his agent is the victim of any of the forms of Direct Assault defined
(ART. 149) in Art. 148 and a person comes to the aid of them
2. WHO- PASSIVE — The person comes to the aid of agents of persons in authority
3. ACT — That the offender assaults such person
4. HOW [2] — By either —
a. Force
b. Intimidation
RESISTANCE OR 1. WHEN — That a person in authority or his agent is engaged in the performance of official duty and gives a
SERIOUS lawful order to the offender
DISOBEDIENCE TO A b. WHEN — The act of the offender is NOT included in the provisions of —
PERSON IN AUTHORITY i. Art. 148 (Direct Assault)
ii. Art. 149 (Indirect Assault)
OR HIS AGENT
iii. Art. 150 (Disobedience to Summons)
(ART. 151) 2. ACT [2] — Offender either —
a. Resists (Must not be serious)
b. Seriously Disobeys
SIMPLE DISOBEDIENCE 1. WHEN — An agent of a person in authority is engaged in the performance of official duty and gives a
TO AN AGENT OF A lawful order to the offender
PERSON IN AUTHORITY 2. ACT — Offender disobeys such agent of a person in authority (Disobedience must not be serious)
(ART. 151)
QUALIFYING (HOW) — For the 1st and 2nd Act, if the disturbance and interruption is of a tumultuous
character
ELEMENTS
by law
a. ACT [2] — The offender either —
i. Encourages disobedience to the law or to the constituted authorities
ii. Praises, justifies, or extols any act punished by law
b. HOW — By means of printing, lithography, or any other means of publication or by words, utterances
or speeches
3. Any person who shall maliciously publish or cause to be published any official resolution or
document without proper authority, or before they have been published officially
4. Any person who shall print, publish, or distribute or cause to be printed, published, or distributed
books, pamphlets, periodicals, or leaflets which do not bear the real printer’s name, or which are
classified as anonymous
ILLEGAL ASSEMBLIES Any meeting attended by armed persons for the purpose of committing any of the crimes punishable
(ART. 146) under the RPC
1. WHEN — That there is a meeting or gathering, whether in a fixed place or moving, attended by armed
persons for the purpose of committing any of the crimes punishable under the RPC
2. WHO — Organizers, leaders, or those merely present (some of whom are armed)
3. WHY — Offenders should have knowledge of the purpose of the meeting (not merely attending out of
sheer curiosity)
Any meeting in which the audience is incited to the crime of Treason, Rebellion, or Insurrection,
Sedition, or Direct Assault
1. WHEN — That there is a meeting, a gathering or group or persons, whether in a fixed place or moving
2. WHO — Any persons attending such meeting, whether armed or not
3. ACT — Attending a meeting where the audience is incited to the commission of the crime of either —
a. Treason
b. Rebellion or insurrection
c. Sedition
d. Direct assault
ELEMENTS
ACTS TENDING TO 1. WHEN [2] — That there be a projected or actual meeting of either —
PREVENT THE MEETING a. Congress or any of its committees of subcommittees, constitutional committees, or divisions thereof
OF THE CONGRESS AND b. Any provincial, city or municipal council or board
3. ACT — That the offender who may be any person prevents such meeting
OTHER SIMILAR
4. HOW — By force or fraud
BODIES
(ART. 143)
DISTURBANCE OF 1. WHEN — That there be a meeting of Congress or any of its committees, subcommittees, constitutional
PROCEEDINGS OF OF commissions or committees or divisions thereof, or of any provision board or city or municipal council or
CONGRESS OR SIMILAR board
BODIES 2. ACT [2] — The offender either —
(ART. 144) a. Disturbs any of such meetings
b. Behaves while in the presence of any of such bodies in such a manner as to interrupt its proceedings
or to impair the respect due it
VIOLATION OF By Preventing any Member of Congress from attending the Meetings of the Assembly, from Expressing his
PARLIAMENTARY Opinions, or Casting his Vote
IMMUNITY 1. WHO — Any person
(ART. 145) 2. ACT [3] — Offender prevents any member of the National Assembly from —
a. Attending the meetings of Congress, any of its committees or subcommittees, constitutional
commissions or committees or divisions thereof
b. Expressing his opinions
c. Casting his vote
3. HOW — Offender acts with force, intimidation, threats or fraud
MITIGATING (WHERE) — If the escape of the prisoner shall take place outside of the jail or penal
establishment by taking the guards by surprise
ELEMENTS
EVASION OF SERVICE Art. 157 — By Escaping during the Term of his Sentence
OF SENTENCE 1. WHO — Offender is a convict by final judgment who is serving his sentence which consists in deprivation of
(ART. 157-159) liberty
2. ACT — He evades the service of his sentence by escaping during the term of his sentence
CRIME ELEMENTS
HOW FORGERY IS 1. By giving to a treasury or bank note or any instrument, payable to bearer or order mentioned therein, the
COMMITTED appearance of a true genuine document.
(ART. 169) 2. By erasing, substituting, counterfeiting or altering by any means the figures, letters, words or signs
contained therein.
USING FORGED 1. WHEN — That the Great Seal of the Republic was counterfeited or the signature or stamp of the Chief
SIGNATURE OR Executive was forged by another person
COUNTERFEIT SEAL OR 2. WHO — Offender knew the counterfeiting or forgery
STAMP 3. ACT — He used the counterfeit seal or forged signature or stamp
(ART. 162)
MAKING, IMPORTING 1. WHAT [2] — Any of the following false or counterfeited coins —
AND UTTERING FALSE a. Current or withdrawn coins of the Philippines
COINS b. Current or withdrawn coins of Foreign Countries
(ART. 163) 2. ACT [3] — Offender either —
a. Made or counterfeited such coins
b. Imported such coins
c. Uttered such coins in connivance with the counterfeiters or importers
MUTILATION OF COINS, 1. WHAT — Current coins of the Philippines (does not include those of a foreign country or those withdrawn) 2.
IMPORTATION AND ACT [3] —
UTTERING OF a. Mutilating coins of the legal currency, with the further requirement that there be intent to damage or to
MUTILATED COINS defraud another
(ART. 164) b. Importing such mutilated current coins
c. Uttering such mutilated current coins in connivance with the mutilator or importer in case of uttering
ILLEGAL POSSESSION 1. WHEN [2] — That either of the following finical instruments is falsified or forger by another person —
AND USE OF FORGED a. Any treasury or bank note or certificate or other obligation and security payable to bearer
TREASURY OR BANK b. Any instrument payable to order or other document of credit not payable to bearer is forged
NOTES AND OTHER 3. WHO — Offender knows that any of those instruments is forged or falsified
INSTRUMENTS OF 4. ACT [2] — Offender either —
a. Uses any such forged or falsified instruments
CREDIT
b. Possess with intent to use any of such forged or falsified instruments
(ART. 168)
FALSIFICATION OF 1. WHEN — That there be a bill, resolution, or ordinance enacted or approved or pending approval by either
LEGISLATIVE House or Legislature or any local legislative bodies
DOCUMENTS 2. ACT — Offender, without authority, alters such bill, resolution or ordinance in such a way that the it has
(ART. 170) changed the meaning of the document
c. Attributing to persons who have participated in an act or proceeding statements other than those in
fact made by them.
d. Making untruthful statements in a narration of facts
e. Altering true dates
f. Making any alteration or intercalation in a genuine document which changes its meaning
g. Issuing in authenticated form a document purporting to be a copy of an original document when no
such original exists, or including in such copy a statement contrary to, or different from, that of the
genuine original
h. Intercalating any instrument or note relative to the issuance thereof in a protocol, registry or official book
USE OF FALSIFIED 1. WHEN — That the accused knew that wireless, cable, telegraph, or telephone message was falsified by
WIRELESS, TELEGRAPH, any of the persons specified int he first paragraph of Art. 173
AND TELEPHONE 2. ACT — Accused used such falsified dispatch
MESSAGES 3. EFFECT — That the use of the falsified dispatch resulted in the prejudice of a third party, or that the use
thereof was with intent to cause such prejudice (Element of Damage)
(ART. 173[2])
FALSE TESTIMONY IN 1. ACT [2] — That the accused made a statement under oath or executed an affidavit upon a material matter
OTHER CASES AND which contains a wilful and deliberate assertion of falsehood
PERJURY 2. HOW — That the statement or affidavit was made before a competent officer, authorized to receive and
(ART. 183) administer oath
3. WHEN — That the sworn statement or affidavit containing falsity is required by law (simply means that it is
made for a legal purpose, specific law not necessary)
MACHINATIONS IN 1. By soliciting any gift or promise as a consideration for refraining from taking part in any public
PUBLICATION auction
(ART. 185) a. WHEN — There is a public auction
b. ACT — The offender solicits any gift or promise from any of the bidders as consideration from his
refraining from taking part in that public auction
c. WHY — There is an intent to cause the reduction of the price of the thing auctioned
2. By attempting to cause bidders to stay away from an auction by threats, gifts, promises or any other
artifice
a. WHEN — There is a public auction
b. ACT — That the accused attempted to cause the bidders to stay away from that public auction.
c. HOW — It was done by threats, gifts, promises or any other artifice.
d. WHY — There is an intent to cause the reduction of the price of the thing auctioned.
CRIME ELEMENTS
QUALIFYING — The penalty is imposed in the maximum period in either of the following cases —
1. HOW — The act is committed through the use of a diplomatic passport, diplomatic facilities or any other
means involving his/her official status intended to facilitate the unlawful entry of the same.
2. WHO — If the offender is the one who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of such illegal
activities
QUALIFYING — The penalty is imposed in the maximum period in either of the following cases —
1. WHERE — If the sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution or transportation of any
dangerous drug and/or controlled precursor and essential chemical transpires within one hundred (100)
meters from the school
2. HOW — If minors or mentally incapacitated individuals are used as as runners, couriers and messengers,
or in any other capacity directly connected to the dangerous drugs and/or controlled precursors and
essential chemicals trade
3. EFFECT — If the victim of the offense is a minor or a mentally incapacitated individual, or should a
dangerous drug or a controlled precursor and essential chemical involved in any offense herein provided
be the proximate cause of death of a victim thereof
4. WHO — If the offender is the one who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of such illegal
activities
MAINTENANCE OF A 1. ACT — The offender maintains a den, dive or resort where the following is used or sold in any form —
DANGEROUS DRUG a. Dangerous drug
DEN, DIVE OR RESORT b. Controlled precursor and essential chemical
(SEC. 6, RA 9165)
QUALIFYING — The penalty is imposed in the maximum period in either of the following cases —
1. WHEN — Where any dangerous drug is administered, delivered or sold to a minor who is allowed to use
the same in such a place.
2. EFFECT — Should any dangerous drug be the proximate cause of the death of a person using the same in
such den, dive or resort
3. WHO — If the offender is the one who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of such illegal
activities
CRIME ELEMENTS
BEING EMPLOYEES OR 1. Any employee of a den, dive or resort, who is aware of the nature of the place as such
VISITORS OF A 2. Any person who, not being included in the provisions of the next preceding paragraph, is aware of the
DANGEROUS DRUG nature of the place as such and shall knowingly visit the same.
DEN, DIVE OR RESORT
(SEC. 7, RA 9165)
MANUFACTURE OF 1. ACT — The offender engages in the manufacture of either any of the following —
DANGEROUS DRUGS, a. Dangerous drug
PRECURSORS AND b. Controlled precursor and essential chemical
2. WHEN — Not authorized by law
CHEMICALS
(SEC. 8, RA 9165)
QUALIFYING — The penalty is imposed in the maximum period in either of the following cases —
1. WHEN [4]—
a. Any phase of the manufacturing process was conducted in the presence or with the help of minors
b. Any clandestine laboratory was secured or protected with booby traps
c. Any clandestine laboratory was concealed with legitimate business operations
d. The offender employs any practitioner, chemical engineer, public official or foreigner
2. WHERE — Any phase or manufacturing process was established or under taken within one hundred (100)
meters of a residential, business, church or school premises
3. WHO — If the offender is the one who organizes, manages or acts as a "financier" of any of such illegal
activities
ILLEGAL CHEMICAL 1. ACT — The offender llegally diverts any controlled precursor and essential chemical
DIVERSION 2. WHEN — Not authorized by law
(SEC. 9, RA 9165)
a. Used to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce,
process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain or conceal any dangerous drug and/or
controlled precursor and essential chemical
b. Used to inject, ingest, inhale or otherwise introduce into the human body a dangerous drug
QUALIFYING (HOW) — A minor or a mentally incapacitated individual is used to deliver such equipment,
instrument, apparatus and other paraphernalia for dangerous drugs.
their derivatives, without having any therapeutic value or if the quantity possessed is far beyond
therapeutic requirements, as determined and promulgated by the Board
POSSESSION OF 1. ACT — Offender possesses or have under his control any equipment, instrument, apparatus and other
EQUIPMENT AND paraphernalia fit or intended for smoking, consuming, administering, injecting, ingesting, or introducing
OTHER DRUG any dangerous drug into the body
PARAPHERNALIA 2. WHEN — Not authorized by law
(SEC. 12, RA
9165)
POSSESSION OF 1. ACT [2] — Offender possesses or have under his control any of the following —
DANGEROUS DRUGS a. Dangerous drug
OR PARAPHERNALIA
b. Equipment, instrument, apparatus and other paraphernalia fit or intended for smoking, consuming,
administering, injecting, ingesting, orintroducing any dangerous drug into the body
DURING PARTIES,
2. WHEN — during a party, or at a social gathering or meeting, or in the proximate company of at least two
SOCIAL GATHERINGS
(2) persons
OR MEETINGS
(SEC. 13, 14, RA 9165)
USE OF DANGEROUS 1. ACT — A person apprehended or arrested, who is found to be positive for use of any dangerous drug,
DRUGS after a confirmatory test
(SEC. 15, RA 9165) 2. WHEN — The person tested is NOT found to have in his possession such quantity of any dangerous drug
(In such case, “possession of dangerous drugs” is the proper offense)
FAILURE TO MAINTAIN 1. WHO — Any practitioner, manufacturer, wholesaler, importer, distributor, dealer or retailer
RECORD OF 2. ACT — Such offender violates or fails to comply with the maintenance and keeping of the original records of
TRANSACTIONS transactions on any dangerous drug or controlled precursor and essential chemical
(SEC. 17, RA 9165)
UNNECESSARY 1. WHO — Any practitioner (licensed physician, dentist, chemist, medical technologist, nurse, midwife,
PRESCRIPTION OF veterinarian or pharmacist in the Philippines)
DANGEROUS DRUGS 2. ACT — Such offender prescribes any dangerous drug to any person whose physical or physiological
(SEC. 18, RA 9165) condition does not require the use or in the dosage prescribed therein, as determined by the Board
ACTING AS A ‣ ACT — The offender acts as a “protector or coddler” of offenders punished for any of the following —
“PROTECTOR OR 1. Importation of Dangerous Drugs, Precursors and Chemicals (Sec. 4, RA 9165)
CODDLER” OF DRUG 2. Sale, Trading, Administration, etc. of Dangerous Drugs, Precursors and Chemicals (Sec. 5, RA 9165)
OFFENDERS 3. Maintenance of a Dangerous drug Den, Dive or Resort (Sec. 6, RA 9165)
4. Manufacture of Dangerous Drugs, Precursors and Chemicals (Sec. 8, RA 9165)
5. Cultivation or Culture of Plants Classified as Dangerous Drugs or are Sources Thereof (Sec. 16, RA
9165)
“Protector or coddler” — Any person who knowingly and willfully consents to the unlawful acts provided for in
this Act and uses his/her influence, power or position in shielding, harboring, screening or facilitating the
escape of any person he/she knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe on or suspects, has violated the
provisions of this Act in order to prevent the arrest, prosecution and conviction of the violator
TITLE 6 — CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC MORALS
CRIME ELEMENTS
ILLEGAL GAMBLING 1. Any person who, in any manner, shall directly or indirectly take part in any of the following illegal or
(PD 1602) unauthorized activities or games —
a. Cockfighting, Jueteng, Jai-alai or horse racing to include bookie operations and game fixing,
numbers, bingo and other forms of lotteries
b. Cara y cruz, pompiang and the like
c. 7-11 and any game using dice
d. Black jack, lucky nine, poker and its derivatives, monte, baccarat, cuajo, pangguigue and other
card games;
e. pak que, high and low, mahjong, domino and other games using plastic tiles and the like
f. Slot machines, roulette, pinball and other mechanical contraptions and devices
g. Dog racing, boat racing, car racing and other forms of races
h. Basketball, boxing, volleyball, bowling, pingpong and other forms of individual or team contests to
include game fixing, point shaving and other machinations
i. Banking or percentage game, or any other game or scheme, whether upon chance or skill, wherein
wagers consisting of money, articles of value or representative of value are at stake or made
2. Any person who shall knowingly permit any form of gambling referred to in the preceding subparagraph to
be carried on in an inhabited or uninhabited place or in any building, vessel or other means of transportation
owned or controlled by him.
3. Any person who shall knowingly permit any form of gambling to be carried on in a place which has a
reputation of a gambling place or that prohibited gambling is frequently carried on therein, or in a public or
government building or barangay hall
4. The maintainer or conductor of the above gambling schemes.
5. Any person who knowingly and without lawful purpose in any hour of any day, possesses any lottery list,
paper or other matter containing letters, figures, signs or symbols pertaining to or in any manner used in
the games of jueteng, jai-alai or horse racing bookies and
6. Any barangay official who, with knowledge of the existence of a gambling house or place in his jurisdiction
fails to abate the same or take action in connection therewith
7. Any security officer, security guard watchman, private or house detective of hotels, villages, buildings,
enclosures and the like which have the reputation of a gambling place or where gambling activities are
being held
GRAVE SCANDAL 1. ACT — Offender performs an act or acts with are highly scandalous as offending against decency or good
(ART. 200) customs.
2. WHEN — That the highly scandalous conduct is not expressly falling within any other article of this Code.
3. WHERE — That the act or acts complained of be committed in a public place or within the public
knowledge or view.
PROSTITUTION 1. WHO — Offender is NOT a minor (18 years of age and above) who must be a woman
(ART. 202) 2. ACT — Habitually indulging in either --
a. Sexual intercourse
b. Lascivious conduct
3. WHY — For money or profit
CRIME ELEMENTS
DERELICTION OF DUTY 1. WHO — Offender is a public officer or officer of the law who has a duty to cause the prosecution of, or to
IN PROSECUTION OF prosecute, offenses
OFFENSES 2. ACT [2]— The the offender, in dereliction of the duties of his office, either —
(ART. 208) a. Refrains from instituting prosecution against violators of the law
b. Tolerates the commission of offenses
3. WHY — That the offender acts with malice and deliberate intent to favor the violator of the law.
QUALIFYING — The crime committed is qualified bribery if the following elements are present —
1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer entrusted with law enforcement
2. ACT — That the offender refrains from arresting or prosecuting an offender who has committed a crime
punishable by reclusion perpetua and/or death
3. WHY — In consideration of any promise, gift or present
ANTI-GRAFT AND In addition to acts or omissions of public officers already penalized by existing law, the following shall constitute
CORRUPT PRACTICES corrupt practices of any public officer and are hereby declared to be unlawful —
ACT (a)Persuading, inducing or influencing another public officer to perform an act constituting a violation of rules and
(SEC. 3, R.A. NO. 3019 regulations duly promulgated by competent authority or an offense in connection with the official duties
AS AMENDED BY RA of the latter, or allowing himself to be persuaded, induced, or influenced to commit such violation or
3047, PD 77 AND BP offense.
195)
(b)Directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present, share, percentage, or benefit, for himself or for
any other person, in connection with any contract or transaction between the Government and any other part,
wherein the public officer in his official capacity has to intervene under the law.
(c) Directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present or other pecuniary or material benefit, for
himself or for another, from any person for whom the public officer, in any manner or capacity, has secured or
obtained, or will secure or obtain, any Government permit or license, in consideration for the help given or to
be given, without prejudice to Section thirteen of this Act.
(d)Accepting or having any member of his family accept employment in a private enterprise which has pending
official business with him during the pendency thereof or within one year after its termination.
(e)Causing any undue injury to any party, including the Government, or giving any private party any unwarranted
benefits, advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative or judicial functions through
manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence. This provision shall apply to officers and
employees of offices or government corporations charged with the grant of licenses or permits or other
concessions.
(f) Neglecting or refusing, after due demand or request, without sufficient justification, to act within a reasonable
time on any matter pending before him for the purpose of obtaining, directly or indirectly, from any person
interested in the matter some pecuniary or material benefit or advantage, or for the purpose of favoring his own
interest or giving undue advantage in favor of or discriminating against any other interested party.
(g)Entering, on behalf of the Government, into any contract or transaction manifestly and grossly
disadvantageous to the same, whether or not the public officer profited or will profit thereby.
(h)Director or indirectly having financing or pecuniary interest in any business, contract or transaction in
connection with which he intervenes or takes part in his official capacity, or in which he is prohibited by the
Constitution or by any law from having any interest.
(i) Directly or indirectly becoming interested, for personal gain, or having a material interest in any transaction
or act requiring the approval of a board, panel or group of which he is a member, and which exercises discretion
in such approval, even if he votes against the same or does not participate in the action of the board,
committee, panel or group. Interest for personal gain shall be presumed against those public officers
responsible for the approval of manifestly unlawful, inequitable, or irregular transaction or acts by the board,
panel or group to which they belong.
(j) Knowingly approving or granting any license, permit, privilege or benefit in favor of any person not qualified for
or not legally entitled to such license, permit, privilege or advantage, or of a mere representative or dummy of
one who is not so qualified or entitled.
(k) Divulging valuable information of a confidential character, acquired by his office or by him on account of his
official position to unauthorized persons, or releasing such information in advance of its authorized release
date.
FRAUDS AGAINST THE 1. WHO — That the offender be a public officer who takes advantage of his office, that is, he intervened in the
PUBLIC TREASURY transaction in his official capacity.
(ART. 213) 2. ACT [3] — Offender enters into an agreement with any interested party or speculator or made use of any
other scheme with regard to either —
a. Furnishing supplies
b. Making of contracts
c. Adjustment or settlement of accounts relating to public property or funds
3. WHY — That the accused had intent to defraud the Government
CRIME ELEMENTS
ILLEGAL EXACTIONS 1. WHO — The offender is a public officer entrusted with the collection of taxes, licenses, fees and other
(ART. 213) imposts.
2. ACT [3] — The offender either —
a. Demands, directly or indirectly, the payment of sums different from or larger than those authorized by law
b. Fails voluntarily to issue a receipt, as provided by law, for any sum of money collected by him officially
c. Collects or receives, directly or indirectly, by way of payment or otherwise, things or objects of a
nature different from that provided by law
OTHER FRAUDS 1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer who takes advantage of his official position.
(ART. 214) 2. ACT — That he commits any of the frauds or deceits enumerated in Arts. 315 to 318 —
a. Art. 315 — Estafa
b. Art. 316 — Other forms of swindling
c. Art. 317 — Swindling a minor
d. Art. 318 — Other deceits
POSSESSION OF 1. Public officer who, directly or indirectly, became interested in any contract or business in which it was his
PROHIBITED INTEREST official duty to intervene.
BY A PUBLIC OFFICER 2. Experts, arbitrators, and private accountants who, in like manner, took part in any contract or transaction
(ART. 216) connected with the estate or property in the appraisal, distribution or adjudication of which they had acted.
3. Guardians and executors with respect to the property belonging to their wards or the estate.
REMOVAL, 1. WHO — That the offender be a public officer who is entrusted with documents or papers by reason of his
CONCEALMENT OR office.
DESTRUCTION OF 2. ACT [3] — That he either does any of the following to such documents or papers —
DOCUMENTS a. Abstracts (removes)
b. Destroys
(ART. 226)
c. Conceals
3. EFFECT [2] — That damage, whether serious or not, should have been caused to either —
a. A third party
b. The public interest
CRIME ELEMENTS
OFFICER BREAKING 1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer charged with the custody of papers or property.
SEAL 2. WHEN — Such papers or property are sealed by proper authority.
(ART. 227) 3. ACT [2] — That he either —
a. Breaks the seals
b. Permits them to be broken.
OPENING OF CLOSED 1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer who is entrusted with the custody of any closed papers,
DOCUMENTS documents, or objects
(ART. 228) 2. ACT [2] — That he either —
a. Opens
b. Permits to be opened said closed papers, documents or objects.
3. WHEN — He does not have proper authority.
REVELATION OF 1. By revealing any secrets known to the offending public officer by reason of his official capacity.
SECRETS BY AN a. WHO — That the offender is a public officer who knows of a secret by reason of his official capacity.
OFFICER b. ACT — That he reveals such secret without authority or justifiable reasons.
c. EFFECT — That damage, great or small, be caused to the public interest.
(ART. 229)
2. By delivering wrongfully papers or copies of papers of which he may have charge and which should not
be published.
a. WHO — That the offender is a public officer who has charge of papers which should not be published.
b. ACT — That he wrongfully delivers those papers or copies thereof to a third person.
c. EFFECT — That damage be caused to public interest
PUBLIC OFFICER 1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer who knows of the secrets of a private individual by reason of his
REVEALING SECRETS OF office.
PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL 2. ACT — That he reveals such secrets without authority or justifiable reason.
(ART. 230)
REFUSAL TO 1. WHO — That the offender is elected by popular election to a public office.
DISCHARGE ELECTIVE 2. ACT [2] — That he refuses —
OFFICE a. To be sworn in or
(ART. 234) b. To discharge the duties of said office
3. WHEN — That there is no legal motive for such refusal to be sworn in or to discharge the duties of said
office.
MALTREATMENT OF 1. WHO — That the offender is a public officer or employee who has under his charge a prisoner by final
PRISONERS judgment or detention prisoner.
(ART. 235) 2. ACT — That he maltreats such prisoner in either of the following manners —
a. By overdoing himself in the correction or handling of a prisoner or detention prisoner under his
charge either by —
i. Imposing punishments not authorized by the regulations
ii. Inflicting such punishments (those authorized) in a cruel and humiliating manner
b. By maltreating such prisoner to extort a confession or to obtain some information from the
prisoner.
ANTICIPATION OF 1. WHO — That the offender is entitled to hold a public office or employment, either by election or
DUTIES OF A PUBLIC appointment.
OFFICE 2. WHEN — The law requires that he should first be sworn in and/or should first give a bond.
(ART. 236) 3. WHEN — He assumes the performance of the duties and powers of such office.
4. ACT — That he has not taken his oath of office and/or given the bond required by law.
PROLONGING 1. WHO — That the offender is public officer who is holding a public office.
PERFORMANCE OF 2. WHEN — The period provided by law, regulations or special provisions for holding such office, has
already expired.
DUTIES AND POWERS
(ART. 237) 3. ACT — That he continues to exercise the duties and powers of such office despite such expiration
QUALIYFING (WHY) — If the purpose of such abandonment is to evade the duty of preventing, prosecuting, or
punishing any other crime.
USURPATION OF 1. WHO — That the offender is an officer of the executive branch of the Government.
JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS 2. ACT [2] — That he either —
a. Assumes judicial powers
(ART. 241)
b. Obstructs the execution of any order or decision rendered by any judge within his jurisdiction
CRIME ELEMENTS
CRIME ELEMENTS
DEATH CAUSED IN A 1. WHEN — There are several persons, not composed of a group organized for the common purpose of
TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY assaulting and attacking each other reciprocally, who quarrelled and assaulted each other in a confused
(ART. 251) and tumultuous manner (tumultuous affray)
2. WHEN — Someone was killed in the course of the affray
3. WHEN — It cannot be ascertained who actually killed the accused
4. WHO — Offenders must have participated in the tumultuous affray
5. ACT [2] — Two ways to be liable —
a. Person who inflicted serious physical injuries on victim can be identified — Inflicting serious physical
injuries on the victim
b. Not known who inflicted the serious physical injuries on the victim — All those who used violence
upon the person of the victim
CRIME ELEMENTS
PHYSICAL INJURIES 1. WHEN — There are several persons, not composed of a group organized for the common purpose of
INFLICTED IN A assaulting and attacking each other reciprocally, who quarrelled and assaulted each other in a confused
TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY and tumultuous manner (tumultuous affray)
(ART. 252) 2. WHEN — A participant or some participants thereof suffer serious physical injuries or physical injuries of a
less serious nature only.
3. WHEN — That the person responsible for such physical injuries cannot be identified.
4. ACT — All the offenders employing violence upon the person of the offended party are liable
DISCHARGE OF 1. ACT — That the offender discharges a firearm against or at another person.
FIREARMS 2. WHEN — That the offender has NO intent to kill that person.
(ART. 254)
SERIOUS PHYSICAL 1. ACT [3] — Any person who commits any of the following to another —
INJURIES a. Wound
(ART. 263) b. Beat
c. Assault
2. EFFECT [4] —
a. When the injured person either becomes —
i. Insane (mental)
ii. Imbecile (mental)
iii. Impotent (physical)
iv. Blind (physical)
b. When the injured person either —
i. Loses the use of speech or the power to hear or to smell, or loses an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm
or a leg
d. When the person injured becomes ill or incapacitated for labor for more than 30 days but not more
than 90 days (31-90 days)
QUALIFYING — If the offense is committed against any of the persons enumerated in Art. 246 (Parricide) or
with attendance of any of the circumstances mentioned in Art. 248 (Murder)
ADMINISTERING 1. ACT — That the offender inflicted upon another any serious physical injury
INJURIOUS 2. HOW — That it was done by knowingly administering to him any injurious substances or beverages or by
SUBSTANCES taking advantage of his weakness of mind or credulity
(ART. 264) 3. WHY — Offender had no intent to kill
CRIME ELEMENTS
LESS SERIOUS 1. ACT — Inflicting upon another physical injuries not described in Art 263 (Serious Physical Injuries) or Art.
PHYSICAL INJURIES 264 (Administering injurious substances)
(ART. 265) 2. EFFECT [2] — That the offender party is either:—
a. Incapacitated for labor for ten days or more but not more than 30 days (10-30 days)
b. Needs medical attendance for the same period of time
QUALIFYING [3] —
1. WHY — When there is a manifest intent to insult or offend the injured person
2. WHEN —There are circumstances adding ignominy to the offense
3. WHO-PASSIVE — Victim is either —
a. The offender’s parents, ascendants, guardians, curators, or teachers
b. Persons of rank or persons in authority, provided the crime is NOT direct assault
QUALIFYING — BOTH kinds of rapes are qualified to Qualified Rape in the following cases —
1. HOW [2] — The rape is committed by either any of the following --
a. The use of a deadly weapon
b. By two or more persons
2. WHO [2] — The offender is either —
a. Any member of the AFP, PNP, law enforcement agency or penal institution when he took advantage of
his position
b. The parent, guardian, stepparent, ascendant, relative by consanguinity or affinity within the third
civil degree or the common law spouse of the parent of the victim AND such victim is under 18
CRIME ELEMENTS
years or age
3. EFFECT [4] — By reason of the rape, the victim either --
a. Suffered permanent physical mutilation or disability
b. Becomes insane because of or during the rape
c. Is pregnant and the offender knew of such fact
d. Suffering from mental disability, emotional disorder or physical handicap and the offender knows
such fact
4. WHO-PASSIVE [3] — The offended party is either —
a. Under the custody of the police or military authorities or any law enforcement of penal institution
b. A child below 7 years old
c. A religious engaged in legitimate religious vocation or calling and is personally known to be such by
the offender before or at the time of rape
5. WHEN [2] — The rape was committed —
a. In full view of victims band, parent, any of the children or other relatives within the third civil degree
of consanguinity (not affinity)
b. By an offender knows he has HIV/AIDS or other STD and the virus is transmitted to the victim
3. ACT — The offender commits any of the following acts which result in or is likely to result in physical,
sexual, psychological harm or suffering, or economic abuse including threats of such acts, battery,
assault, coercion,harassment or arbitrary deprivation of liberty —
a. Causing physical harm to the woman or her child
b. Threatening to cause the woman or her child physical harm
c. Attempting to cause the woman or her child physical harm
d. Placing the woman or her child in fear of imminent physical harm
e. Attempting to compel or compelling the woman or her child to engage in conduct which the woman or
her child has the right to desist from or desist from conduct which the woman or her child has the
right to engage in, or attempting to restrict or restricting the woman's or her child's freedom of
movement or conduct by force or threat of force, physical or other harm or threat of physical or other
harm, or intimidation directed against the woman or child. Such as —
i. Threatening to deprive or actually depriving the woman or her child of custody to her/his family
ii. Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her children of financial support legally due her
or her family, or deliberately providing the woman's children insufficient financial support
iii. Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her child of a legal right
iv. Preventing the woman in engaging in any legitimate profession, occupation, business or activity
or controlling the victim's own money or properties, or solely controlling the conjugal or common
money, or properties
f. Inflicting or threatening to inflict physical harm on oneself for the purpose of controlling her actions or
decisions
g. Causing or attempting to cause the woman or her child to engage in any sexual activity which does not
constitute rape, by force or threat of force, physical harm, or through intimidation directed against
the woman or her child or her/his immediate family
h. Engaging in purposeful, knowing, or reckless conduct, personally or through another, that alarms or
CRIME ELEMENTS
causes substantial emotional or psychological distress to the woman or her child. Such as —
i. Stalking or following the woman or her child in public or private places
ii. Peering in the window or lingering outside the residence of the woman or her child
iii. Entering or remaining in the dwelling or on the property of the woman or her child against her/his will
iv. Destroying the property and personal belongings or inflicting harm to animals or pets of the
woman or her child
v. Engaging in any form of harassment or violence
i. Causing mental or emotional anguish, public ridicule or humiliation to the woman or her child,
including, but not limited to, repeated verbal and emotional abuse, and denial of financial support or
custody of minor children of access to the woman's child/children
CRIME ELEMENTS
KIDNAPPING AND 1. WHO — Offender is a private individual/ public officer acting in private capacity
SERIOUS ILLEGAL 2. ACT [3] — Offender does any of the following to another:
DETENTION a. Illegally Kidnaps
b. Illegally Detains
(ART. 267)
c. In any other manner illegally deprives him of his liberty
3. WHEN [4] — That in the commission of the offense, any of the following circumstances are present:
a. ACT: That the kidnapping or detention lasts for more than 3 days
b. HOW: That it is committed simulating public authority
c. HOW: That any serious physical injuries are inflicted upon the person kidnapped or detained or
threats to kill him are made
d. WHO-PASSIVE: That the person kidnapped or detained is a minor, female, or a public officer
4. WHY — Specific intent to kidnap/ deprive the victim of his liberty
QUALIFYING [2] —
1. WHY —When the kidnapping or detention was committed for the purpose of extorting ransom from the
victim
2. WHEN — Victim is killed or dies as a consequence of the detention; or is raped or is subjected to torture
or dehumanizing acts (Special Complex Crime)
SLIGHT ILLEGAL 1. WHO — Offender is a private individual/ public officer acting in private capacity
DETENTION 2. ACT [4] — Offender does any of the following to another —
(ART. 268) a. Illegally Kidnaps
b. Illegally Detains
c. In any other manner illegally deprives him of his liberty
d. Anyone who shall furnish the place for the perpetration of the crime
3. WHEN — That the crime is committed without the attendance of any of the following circumstances
enumerated in Art. 267 —
a. ACT: That the kidnapping or detention lasts for more than 3 days
b. HOW: That it is committed simulating public authority
c. HOW: That any serious physical injuries are inflicted upon the person kidnapped or detained or
threats to kill him are made
d. WHO-PASSIVE: That the person kidnapped or detained is a minor, female, or a public officer
MITIGATING (WHEN) —If the offender shall voluntarily release the person kidnapped or detained within 3 days
from the commencement of the detention provided —
1. He has not attained the purpose intended
2. It is before the institution of criminal proceedings against him
UNLAWFUL ARREST 1. WHO — Offender is a private individual/ public officer acting in private capacity
(ART. 269) 2. ACT — Offender arrests or detains another person
3. WHY — Purpose of the offender is to delver him to the proper authorities
4. WHEN — The arrest or detention is not authorised by law or there is no reasonable ground therefor
FAILURE TO RETURN A 1. WHO — Offender who is entrusted with the custody of a minor
MINOR 2. ACT — Offender deliberately fails to restore the said minor to his parents or guardians
(ART. 270)
MITIGATING (WHO) — If the offender shall be the either parent of the minor
CRIME ELEMENTS
INDUCING A MINOR TO 1. WHEN — That a minor is living in the home of either his —
ABANDON HIS HOME a. Parents
(ART. 271) b. Guardians
c. Person entrusted with his care
2. ACT — Offender induces said minor to abandon such home
MITIGATING (WHO) — If the offender shall be the father or the mother of the minor
QUALIFYING (WHY) — Crime be committed for the purpose of assigning the victim to some immoral traffic
SERVICES RENDERED IN 1. ACT —Offender compels a debtor to work for him, either as household servant or farm laborer
PAYMENT OF DEBT 2. WHEN — It is against the will of the debtor
3. WHY — Purpose is to require or enforce the payment of a debt
(ART. 274)
ABANDONMENT OF 1. By failing to render assistance to any person whom the offender finds in an uninhabited place
PERSONS IN DANGER wounded or in danger of dying
AND ABANDONMENT a. WHEN —Offender finds a person wounded or in danger of dying in an uninhabited place
OF ONE’S OWN b. WHO — Person who can render assistance without detriment to himself
VICTIM (ART. 275) c. ACT — Failing to render assistance to the injured person
2. By failing to help or render assistance to another whom the offender has accidentally wounded or
injured
a. WHEN — Offender has accidentally wounded or injured a person
b. ACT — Failure to help or render assistance to such injured person
3. By failing to deliver a child, under 7 years whom the offender has found abandoned
a. WHEN — Offender finds an abandoned child, under 7 years, in an unsafe place
b. ACT — Failure to deliver the child to either —
i. Authorities
ii. Child’s family
iii. A safe place
ABANDONING A 1. WHEN — Offender has custody of the child under 7 years of age
MINOR 2. ACT — Offender abandons such child
(ART. 276) 3. WHY — Offender had no intent to kill
QUALIFYING [2] —
1. When the child dies
2. When the life of the child is in danger
CRIME ELEMENTS
QUALIFYING — Applicable to Par. 4 only, if the delivery shall have been made in consideration of any price,
compensation, or promise
TRESPASS TO 1. WHO — Offender is a private individual/ public officer acting in private capacity
DWELLING 2. ACT — Entering the dwelling of another against the will of the owner or occupant
(ART. 280) 3. WHY — Such offender did NOT enter another’s dwelling for the purpose of either —
a. To prevent some serious harm to himself, the occupants, or a third person
b. Rendering some service to humanity or justice
c. Anyone who enters cafes, taverns, inns, and other public houses, while they are open
GRAVE THREATS 1. ACT — Offender threatens another with the infliction upon the person, honor, or property of the latter or of his
(ART. 282) family of any wrong amounting to a crime
2. WHEN [3] — three possible circumstances, as the offender in making the threat either:
a. Demands money, or imposes any other condition even though not unlawful and the offender
ATTAINED his purpose
b. Demands money, or imposes any other condition even though not unlawful and the offender DID NOT
ATTAIN his purpose (mitigated penalty in this case)
c. Did not impose any condition
LIGHT THREATS ACT — Offender makes a threat to commit a wrong which does NOT constitute a crime and made it with a
(ART. 283) demand of money or imposed any other condition even though not unlawful
ANY OTHER COERCION 1. ACT — Taking possession of the thing belonging to the debtor
(ART. 287) 2. HOW — Through deceit and misrepresentation
3. WHY — Purpose is to apply it to the payment of the debt
DISCOVERING SECRETS 1. WHO — Offender is a private individual or public officer acting in private capacity who is NOT either the —
THROUGH SEIZURE OF a. Parent
CORRESPONDENCE b. Guardian
c. Person entrusted with the custody of minors with respect to the papers or letters of the children or
(ART. 290)
minors placed under their care of custody
REVEALING SECRETS 1. WHO — Offender is either any of the following who learns the secrets of his principal or master in such
WITH ABUSE OF OFFICE capacity —
(ART. 291) a. Manager
b. Employee
c. Servant
2. ACT — Offender reveals such secrets
CRIME
CRIME ELEMENTS
WHO ARE GUILTY OF 1. ACT — Unlawful taking of personal property belonging to another
ROBBERY 2. WHY — Intent to gain
(ART. 293) 3. HOW [2] — By means of either —
a. Violence against or Intimidation of any person
b. Force upon anything
QUALIFYING [8] —
1. WHEN — If the violence or intimidation employed in the commission of the robbery is carried to a degree
clearly unnecessary for the commission of the crime
2. WHAT [2] — When the property taken is either —
a. Mail matter
b. Large cattle
3. WHERE — Robbery is committed in an uninhabited place
4. HOW [4] — Robbery is committed by either —
a. By a band
b. By attacking a moving train, street car motor vehicle or airship
c. By entering the passengers compartments in a train or in any manner taking the passengers
thereof by surpass in the respective conveyances
d. By intimidation with the use of firearms AND it is committed on a street, road or alley
ATTEMPTED AND 1. ACT — Attempted or frustrated unlawful taking of personal property beloning to another
FRUSTRATED ROBBERY 2. WHY — Intent to gain
UNDER CERTAIN 3. HOW — By means of either violence against or intimidation of any person
CIRCUMSTANCES (ART. 4. WHEN — Homicide is committed
297, 302) 5. WHEN — The homicide committed shall NOT deserve a higher penalty under the provisions of this Code
i. An inhabited house
ii. Public building
iii. Edifice devoted to religious
b. ACT —That the offender takes personal property belonging to another, under any of the following
circumstances —
i. By the breaking of doors, wardrobes, chests, or any other kind of locked or sealed furniture or
receptacle
ii. By taking such furniture or objects away to be broken or forced open outside the place of the
robbery
c. WHY — Intent to Gain
QUALIFYING [3] —
1. WHEN — If the robbery is committed in an uninhabited place AND by a band
2. When the property taken is either —
a. Mail matter
b. Large cattle
MITIGATING [6] —
1. WHERE [3] — Robbery is committed in either of the following places —
a. One of the dependencies of an inhabited house
b. Public building
c. Building dedicated to religious worship
2. WHAT [3] — When the robbery consist in the taking of either any of the following —
a. Cereals
b. Fruits
c. Firewood
CRIME ELEMENTS
MITIGATING — WHAT [3] — When the robbery consist in the taking of either any of the following —
1. Cereals
2. Fruits
3. Firewood
QUALIFYING (WHEN) — If any of the arms carried by any of said persons be an unlicensed firearm.
AIDING AND ABETTING 1. WHEN — There is a band of brigands and such fact is known to the offender
A BAND OF BRIGANDS 2. ACT [3] —That the offender does any of the following acts —
a. In any manner aids, abets or protects such band of brigands
(ART. 307)
b. Gives them information of the movements of the police or other peace officers of the Government; or
c. Acquires or receives the property taken by such brigands
CRIME ELEMENTS
QUALIFYING [8] — Art. 310 provides qualifying circumstances for the crime of theft if it is committed —
1. WHO — By a domestic servant
2. HOW — With grave abuse of confidence
3. WHEN — If property is taken on the occasion of fire, earthquake, typhoon, volcanic eruption, or any other
calamity, vehicular accident or civil disturbance
4. WHAT [5] — Property stolen are either any of the following —
a. Motor vehicle
b. Mail matter
c. Large cattle
d. Coconuts taken from the premises of a plantation
e. Fish taken from a fishpond or fishery
THEFT OF THE 1. ACT — Offender takes property of the National Library or of the National Museum
PROPERTY OF THE 2. WHY — Intent to gain
NATIONAL LIBRARY 3. HOW — Means involve no violence against or intimidation of persons nor force upon things
AND NATIONAL
MUSEUM
(ART. 311)
ANTI-FENCING LAW 1. The offender has intent to gain for himself or for another
(PD 1612) 2. The offender shall buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal, sell or dispose of, or shall buy and sell, or
in any other manner deal in any article, item, object or anything of value
3. The offender knows or should be known to him that such property is derived from the proceeds of the crime
of (a) robbery or (b) theft
‣ NOTE — Mere possession of any good, article, item, object, or anything of value which has been the
subject of robbery or thievery shall be prima facie evidence of fencing.
ALTERING BOUNDARIES 1. WHEN — That there are boundary marks or monuments of towns, provinces, or estates, or any other
OR LANDMARKS marks intended to designate the boundaries of the same.
(ART. 313) 2. ACT — That the offender alters said boundary marks
FRAUDULENT 1. WHO — That the offender is a debtor, that is, he has obligations due and payable.
INSOLVENCY 2. ACT — That he absconds with his property (real or personal).
(ART. 314) 3. EFFECT — That there be actual prejudice to his creditors
ESTAFA WITH 1. By altering the substance, of anything with value that the offender should deliver based on an
UNFAITHFULNESS OR obligation
ABUSE OF CONFIDENCE a. WHEN — That the offender has an onerous obligation to deliver something of value
(ART. 315, 1[A-C]) b. ACT [3] — That he alters either its —
i. Substance
ii. Quantity
iii. Quality
c. EFFECT — Damage or prejudice is caused to another
2. By misappropriation, conversion or denial of receipt of a thing received in trust
a. WHEN [4] — That money, goods, or other personal property be received by the offender either —
i. In trust
ii. On commission
iii. For administration
iv. Under any other obligation involving the duty to make delivery or to return the same
b. ACT [3] — Offender either does any of the following in relation to such money or property —
i. Misappropriates
ii. Converts
iii. Denies the receipt
c. EFFECT — That such misappropriation, conversion or denied is to the prejudice of another
d. WHEN — That there is a demand made by the offended party to the offender (Unless when there is
already evidence of misappropriation of the goods by the offender)
3. By taking undue advantage of the signature of the offended party in blank documents
a. WHEN — That the paper with the signature of the offended path be in blank
b. WHEN — That the offended party should have delivered it to the offender
c. ACT — Offender writes above the signature of the offended party without authority to do so
CRIME ELEMENTS
d. EFFECT — That the document written creates a liability of, or causes damage to, the offended party
or any third person
ESTAFA BY MEANS OF COMMON REQUISITES (For all forms of Estafa by means of False Pretenses or Fraudulent Acts) —
FALSE PRETENSES OR 1. ACT — Offender employs an act of —
FRAUDULENT ACTS a. False pretense
(ART. 315, 2[A-E]) b. Fraudulent act
c. Fraudulent means
2. WHEN — Such acts must be made or exeputedprior to or simuletaneously with the commission of the
fraud
3. WHEN — The offended party must have relied on the false pretense, fraudulent act or fraudulent means, that
is, he was induced to part with his money or property because of the false pretense, fraudulent act of
means
4. EFFECT — That as a result, the offended party suffered damage
SPECIFIC ACTS (of Estafa by means of False Pretenses or Fraudulent Acts) —
1. Using fictitious name, falsely pretending to possess power, influence, or by similar means
‣ ACT [3] — The offender either —
a. Uses a fictitious name
b. Falsely pretends to possess any of the following—
i. Power
ii. Influence
iii. Qualifications
iv. Property
v. Credit
vi. Agency
vii. Business
viii. Imaginary transactions
c. Employs other means of other similar deceits
2. Altering the quality, fineness or weight of anything pertaining to one’s art or business
‣ ACT — By altering the following pertaining to his art or business —
a. Quality
b. Fineness
c. Weight
3. Pretending to have bribed a government employee
‣ ACT — By pretending to have bribed any government employee, without prejudice to the action for
calumny which the offended party may deem proper to bring against the offender.
4. Postdating a check or issuing a check knowing that he had no funds in the ban or the funds were
insufficient
a. ACT — Offender either —
i. Postdated a check
ii. Issued a check in payment of an obligation
b. WHEN — That such postdating or issuing a check was done when the offender had no funds in the
bank, or his funds deposited therein were not sufficient to cover the amount of the check
a. Obtains food, refreshment or accommodation at any of the following without paying therefor, with
intent to defraud the proprietor or manager thereof
i. Hotel or inn
ii. Restaurant
iii. Boarding house, lodging house, or partment house without paying therefor, with intent to
defraud the proprietor or manager thereof
b. Obtains credit at any said establishments by the use of any false pretense
c. Abandons or surreptitiously removes any part of his baggage form any of said establishments after
obtaining credit, food, refreshment or accommodation therein, without paying therefor.
CRIME ELEMENTS
ESTAFA THROUGH COMMON REQUISITES (For all forms of Estafa by Fraudulent Means) —
FRAUDULENT MEANS 1. ACT — Offender employs an act of —
(ART. 315, 3[A-C]) a. False pretense
b. Fraudulent act
c. Fraudulent means
2. WHEN — Such acts must be made or executed prior to or simultaneously with the commission of the fraud
3. WHEN — The offended party must have relied on the false pretense, fraudulent act or fraudulent means,
that is, he was induced to part with his money or property because of the false pretense, fraudulent act of
means
4. EFFECT — That as a result, the offended party suffered damage
OTHER FORMS OF 1. Conveying, selling, encumbering, or mortgaging any real property, pretending to be its owner
SWINDLING a. WHAT — That the thing be immovable (real property)
(ART. 316) b. WHEN — That the offender who is not the owner of said property should represent that he is the
owner thereof
c. ACT — That the offender should have executed an act of ownership (selling, leasing, encumbering, or
mortgaging real property)
d. EFFECT — That the act be made to the prejudice of a third person
2. Disposing of real property as free from encumbrance
a. WHAT — That the thing be immovable (real property)
b. WHEN — That the offender knew that the real property was encumbered (encumbrance must be
recorded for it to take effect)
c. WHEN — That there be express representation by the offender that the real property is free from
encumbrance
d. ACT — Offender disposes of such real property
e. EFFECT — That the act be made to the prejudice of a third person
3. Wrongfully taking by the owner his personal property from its lawful possessor
a. WHO — That the offender is the owner of personal property
b. WHEN — That said personal property is in the lawful possession of another
c. ACT — That the offender wrongfully take it from its lawful possessor
d. EFFECT — That prejudice is caused to the possessor or third person
4. Executing any fictitious contract to the prejudice of another
a. ACT — Executing any fictitious contract
b. EFFECT — Such act caused prejudice of another
5. Accepting any compensation for services not rendered or for labor not performed
a. ACT — Accepting any compensation for services not rendered or for labor not performed by the
accused
b. HOW — Such was fraudulently done
6. Selling, mortgaging, or encumbering real property or properties with which the offender guaranteed
the fulfilment of his obligation as surety
a. WHO — Offender is a surety in a bond given in a criminal or civil action
b. WHEN — That he guaranteed the fulfilment of such obligation with his real property
c. ACT — That he sells, mortgages, or in any other manner encumbers said real property
d. WHEN — That such sale, mortgage or encumbrance is —
i. Without express authority from the court
ii. Made before the cancellation of his bond
iii. Before being relieved from the obligation contracted by him
e. EFFECT — That prejudice is caused to the possessor or third person
SWINDLING A MINOR 1. ACT [3] — That the offender takes advantage of the inexperience or emotions or feelings of a minor by
(ART. 317) inducing such minor to either —
a. Assume an obligation
b. Give any release of any property right.
c. Execute a transfer of any property right.
2. WHEN — That the consideration of such transaction is either —
a. Some loan of money
b. Credit
c. Other personal property.
3. EFFECT — That the transaction is to the detriment of such minor.
DESTRUCTIVE ARSON ACT [8] — When the offender burns any of the following —
(ART. 320 AS AMENDED 1. One (1) or more buildings or edifices, consequent to one single act of burning, or as a result of
BY RA 7659) simultaneous burnings, committed on several or different occasions.
2. Any building of public or private ownership which is either —
a. Devoted to the public in general or where people usually gather or congregate for a definite purpose
(such as — official governmental function or business, private transaction, commerce, trade,
workshop, meetings and conferences)
b. Merely incidental to a definite purpose (such as but not limited to hotels, motels, transient dwellings,
public conveyances or stops or terminals)
‣ Regardless of whether—
a. The offender had knowledge that there are persons in said building or edifice at the time it is set on
fire
b. The building is actually inhabited or not.
3. Any train or locomotive, ship or vessel, airship or airplane, devoted to transportation or conveyance, or for
public use, entertainment or leisure.
4. Any building, factory, warehouse installation and any appurtenances thereto, which are devoted to the
service of public utilities.
5. Any building the burning of which is for the purpose of concealing or destroying evidence of another
violation of law, or for the purpose of concealing bankruptcy or defrauding creditors or to collect from
insurance.
6. Any arsenal, shipyard, storehouse or military powder or fireworks factory, ordnance, storehouse, archives or
general museum of the Government.
7. In an inhabited place, any storehouse or factory of inflammable or explosive materials.
8. When the arson is perpetrated or committed by two (2) or more persons or by a group of persons,
regardless of whether their purpose is merely to burn or destroy the building or the burning merely
constitutes an overt act in the commission or another violation of law.
QUALIFYING (EFFECT) — If as a consequence of the commission of any of the enumerated acts, death results
CRIME ELEMENTS
QUALIFYING [5] —
1. If committed with intent to gain;
2. If committed for the benefit of another;
3. If the offender is motivated by spite or hatred towards the owner or occupant of the property burned;
4. If committed by a syndicate (if its is planned or carried out by a group of three (3) or more persons)
5. If by reason of or on the occasion of the arson death results
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 1. ACT — That the offender deliberately caused damage to the property of another.
IN GENERAL 2. WHEN — Such act does NOT constitute arson or other crimes involving destruction.
(ART. 327) 3. WHY — That the act of damaging another's property be committed merely for the sake of damaging it.
(presupposes that the offender acted due to hate, revenge or other evil motive)
OTHER MISCHIEFS 1. ACT — That the offender deliberately caused damage to the property of another
(ART. 329) 2. WHEN — Such act does NOT constitute arson or other crimes involving destruction and is not included in
Art. 328
3. WHY — That the act of damaging another's property be committed merely for the sake of damaging it.
(presupposes that the offender acted due to hate, revenge or other evil motive)
BUT — Strangers who participate in the commission of the crime are not exempt from criminal liability
TITLE 11 — CRIMES AGAINST CHASTITY
CRIME ELEMENTS
MITIGATING (WHEN) — If the person guilty of adultery committed the offense while being abandoned without
justification by the offended spouse (benefits both offenders)
SEDUCTION 1. WHO-PASSIVE — A woman over 12 and under 18 years of age who is of good reputation, single or
(ART. 337, 338) widowed
2. ACT — Offender has sexual intercourse with her
3. HOW — That it is committed by means of deceit
QUALIFYING — The crime is Qualified Seduction in the following cases (which may NOT involve deceit) —
1. Seduction of a Virgin
a. WHO-PASSIVE — A woman who is a virgin (or at least unmarried and of good reputation) and who is
over 12 but under 18 years of age
b. ACT — That the offender has sexual intercourse or carnal knowledge with her
c. HOW — Such was committed with abuse of authority, confidence or relationship (such as by —
person in public authority, guardian, teacher, priest, house servant)
2. Seduction of a Sister or Descendant
a. WHO [2] — Offender is related to the offended party as either her —
CRIME ELEMENTS
i. Brother
ii. Ascendant
b. WHO-PASSIVE — The sister or descendant of the offender (who is NOT required to be a virgin nor be
under 18 years of age)
c. ACT — That the offender has sexual intercourse or carnal knowledge with her
CHILD PROSTITUTION ACT [3] —The following are acts of Child Prostitution and Other Sexual Abuse —
AND OTHER SEXUAL 1. Those who engage in or promote, facilitate or induce child prostitution which include, but are not limited to,
ABUSE the following —
(SEC. 5, RA 7610) a. Acting as a procurer of a child prostitute
b. Inducing a person to be a client of a child prostitute by means of written or oral advertisements or
other similar means
c. Taking advantage of influence or relationship to procure a child as a prostitute
d. Threatening or using violence towards a child to engage him as a prostitute
e. Giving monetary consideration, goods or other pecuniary benefit to a child with the intent to engage
such child in prostitution
2. Those who commit the act of sexual intercourse or lascivious conduct with a child exploited in prostitution
or subjected to other sexual abuse (BUT — when the victim is under twelve (12) years of age, the
perpetrators shall be prosecuted under Article 335, para graph 3, for rape and Article 336 of the RPC for rape
or lascivious conduct, as the case may be)
3. Those who derive profit or advantage therefrom, whether as manager or owner of the establishment where the
prostitution takes place, or of the sauna, disco, bar, resort, place of entertainment or establishment serving as
a cover or which engages in prostitution in addition to the activity for which the license has been issued to
said establishment.
WHITE SLAVE TRADE ACT [3] — The offender, in any manner, or under any pretext, either —
(ART. 341) 1. Engages in the business of prostitution
2. Profits by prostitution
3. Enlists the services of women for the purpose of prostitution
FORCIBLE ABDUCTION 1. WHO-PASSIVE — Any woman (regardless of her age, civil status, or reputation)
(ART. 342) 2. ACT — Abducting such woman against her will (BUT — if the female abducted is under 12 years of age, it is
not necessary that she be taken against her will)
3. HOW — With lewd designs
CONSENTED 1. WHO-PASSIVE — A woman who is a virgin (or at least unmarried and of good reputation) and who is over
ABDUCTION 12 but under 18 years of age
(ART. 343) 2. ACT — The offender takes her away with her consent, after solicitation or cajolery (flattery)
3. HOW — That the taking away of the offended party must be with lewd designs.
CRIME ELEMENTS
PROSECUTION OF 1. Adultery and concubinage — must be prosecuted upon complaint signed by the offended spouse.
ADULTERY, 2. Seduction, abduction, or acts of lasciviousness — must be prosecuted upon complaint signed by either of the
CONCUBINAGE, following in the order of preference —
SEDUCTION, a. Offended party
ABDUCTION AND ACTS b. Her parents
OF LASCIVIOUSNESS c. Grandparents
(ART. 344)
d. Guardians
3. In case of complex crimes, where one of the component offenses is a public crime, the criminal
prosecution may be instituted by the fiscal.
PERSONS WHO 1. The following persons who cooperate as accomplices are nonetheless punished as principals —
COOPERATE AS a. Ascendants
ACCOMPLICES BUT ARE b. Guardians
PUNISHED AS c. Curators
PRINCIPALS d. Teachers
e. Any other person, who cooperates as accomplice with abuse of authority or confidential
(ART. 346)
relationship
2. This rule applies in the following crimes —
a. Acts of lasciviousness
b. Qualified seduction
c. Simple seduction
d. Acts of lasciviousness with the consent of the offended party Corruption of minors
e. White slave trade
f. Forcible abduction
g. Consented abduction
TITLE 12 — CRIMES AGAINST THE CIVIL STATUS OF PERSONS
CRIME ELEMENTS
SUBSTITUTION OF ONE ACT — Substituting or exchanging a child of a person with that of another
CHILD FOR ANOTHER
(ART. 347)
MARRIAGE ACT [2] — That the offender contracted a marriage knowing at such time that either —
CONTRACTED AGAINST 1. The requirements of the law were not complied with
PROVISIONS OF LAW 2. The marriage was in disregard of a legal impediment
(ART. 350)
QUALIFYING (HOW) — If either of the contracting parties shall obtain the consent of the other by means of
violence, intimidation, or fraud
CRIME
CRIME ELEMENTS
PRESUMPTION OF RULE — Every defamatory imputation is presumed to be malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention and
MALICE; PROOF OF justifiable motive for making it is shown
TRUTH ‣ EXCEPT — in the following cases, actual malice must be proved —
(ART. 354, 361, 362) a. Privilege communications
i. Absolutely Privilege Communications (Art. 6, Sec. 11, 1987 Constitution)
ii. Qualifiedly Privileged Communications — A private communication made by any person to
another in the performance of any legal, moral, or social duty (Art. 354[1], RPC)
How to rebut the presumption of malice — All of the following must be shown —
1. The defamatory imputation is true, in case the law allows proof of the truth of the imputation;
2. It is published with good intention
3. There is justifiable motive for making it
PERSONS LIABLE FOR 1. The person who publishes, exhibits or causes the publication or exhibition of any defamation in writing or
LIBEL similar means.
(ART. 360) 2. The author or editor of a book or pamphlet
3. The editor or business manager of a daily newspaper magazine or serial publication.
4. The owner of the printing plant which publishes a libelous article with his consent and all other persons
who in any way participate in or have connection with its publication.
PROHIBITED 1. WHO — The offender is a reporter, editor or manager of a newspaper daily or magazine.
PUBLICATION OF ACTS 2. ACT — The publishes facts connected with the private life of another which are offensive to the honor,
REFERRED TO IN THE virtue and reputation of said person.
COURSE OF OFFICIAL
PROCEEDINGS
(ART. 357)
INCRIMINATING 1. ACT — That the offender performs an act which directly incriminates or imputes to an innocent person the
INNOCENT PERSON commission of a crime.
(ART. 363) 2. WHEN — Such act does not constitute perjury.
INTRIGUING AGAINST ACT — Making any intrigue which has for its principal purpose to blemish the honor or reputation of a person.
HONOUR
(ART. 364)
TITLE 14 — QUASI-OFFENSES
CRIME ELEMENTS
RECKLESS IMPRUDENCE 1. ACT — That the offender does or fails to do an act voluntarily
(ART. 365) 2. WHY — That it be without malice.
3. EFFECT — That material damage results.
4. WHEN — There is inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of the offender, taking into consideration —
a. His employment or occupation
b. Degree of intelligence,physical condition
c. Other circumstances regarding persons, time and place
SIMPLE IMPRUDENCE 1. ACT — That there is lack of precaution on the part of the offender.
(ART. 365) 2. EFFECT — That the damage impending to be caused is not immediate or the danger is not clearly
manifest.