[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd
Upload
73 views1 page

Based From The Syllabus of Atty. Jazzie M. Sarona-Lozare

Uploaded by

Shiva

The Supreme Court ruled that the last will and testament of Enrique Lopez did not substantially comply with the legal requirements and was therefore invalid. It did not state the total number of pages in the attestation clause as required by law. While the acknowledgment stated it was 7 pages, it was actually 8 pages. This discrepancy could not be determined from examining the will alone and required extrinsic evidence. Substantial compliance allows minor defects determined from the will itself, but failure to state the total page number is a significant defect. The will was not properly executed and attested according to law.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt

Based From The Syllabus of Atty. Jazzie M. Sarona-Lozare

Uploaded by

Shiva
73 views1 page
The Supreme Court ruled that the last will and testament of Enrique Lopez did not substantially comply with the legal requirements and was therefore invalid. It did not state the total number of pages in the attestation clause as required by law. While the acknowledgment stated it was 7 pages, it was actually 8 pages. This discrepancy could not be determined from examining the will alone and required extrinsic evidence. Substantial compliance allows minor defects determined from the will itself, but failure to state the total page number is a significant defect. The will was not properly executed and attested according to law.

Original Description:

x

Original Title

Lopez-v.-Lopez

Copyright

© © All Rights Reserved

Available Formats

DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

The Supreme Court ruled that the last will and testament of Enrique Lopez did not substantially comply with the legal requirements and was therefore invalid. It did not state the total number of pages in the attestation clause as required by law. While the acknowledgment stated it was 7 pages, it was actually 8 pages. This discrepancy could not be determined from examining the will alone and required extrinsic evidence. Substantial compliance allows minor defects determined from the will itself, but failure to state the total page number is a significant defect. The will was not properly executed and attested according to law.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
73 views1 page

Based From The Syllabus of Atty. Jazzie M. Sarona-Lozare

Uploaded by

Shiva
The Supreme Court ruled that the last will and testament of Enrique Lopez did not substantially comply with the legal requirements and was therefore invalid. It did not state the total number of pages in the attestation clause as required by law. While the acknowledgment stated it was 7 pages, it was actually 8 pages. This discrepancy could not be determined from examining the will alone and required extrinsic evidence. Substantial compliance allows minor defects determined from the will itself, but failure to state the total page number is a significant defect. The will was not properly executed and attested according to law.

Copyright:

© All Rights Reserved
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Based from the syllabus of Atty. Jazzie M. Sarona-Lozare, CPA LLM, ESQ.

| 3rd Year- Sanchez Roman | 2020-2021

Lopez v. Lopez attestation clause, being the only check against perjury
[GR No. 189984] | [November 12, 2012] in the probate proceedings.

FACTS: On June 21, 1999, Enrique S. Lopez (Enrique) died


leaving his wife, Wendy B. Lopez, and their four legitimate
children, namely, Petitioner Richard B. Lopez (Richard) and
the respondents Diana Jeanne Lopez (Diana), Marybeth de
Leon (Marybeth) and Victoria L. Tuazon (Victoria) as
compulsory heirs. Before Enrique’s death, he executed a Last
Will and Testament on August 10, 1996 and constituted
Richard as his executor and administrator.

Richard filed a probate of his father's Last Will and Testament


before the RTC of Manila with prayer for the issuance of
letters testamentary in his favor. Marybeth opposed
contending that the purported last will and testament was not
executed and attested as required by law, and that it was
procured by undue and improper pressure and influence on
the part of Richard.

RTC disallowed the probate of the will for failure to comply


with Article 805 of the Civil Code which requires a statement
in the attestation clause of the number of pages used upon
which the will is written. It held that while Article 809 of the
same Code requires mere substantial compliance of the form
laid down in Article 805 thereof, the rule only applies if the
number of pages is reflected somewhere else in the will with
no evidence aliunde or extrinsic evidence required.

The attestation clause did not state the total number of pages
used in the will but the acknowledgment portion stated that
the will consists of 7 pages including the page on which the
ratification and acknowledgment are written, the RTC
observed that it has 8 pages including the acknowledgment
portion. As such, it disallowed the will for not having been
executed and attested in accordance with law.

CA affirmed.

ISSUE: Whether or not there is substantial compliance of the


requirement under Article 805? No.

RULING:

Citing Articles 805 and 809 of the New Civil Code, the Court
ruled that:

The law is clear that the attestation must state the number of
pages used upon which the will is written. The purpose of the
law is to safeguard against possible interpolation or omission
of one or some of its pages and prevent any increase or
decrease in the pages.

There can be no substantial compliance- While Article


809 allows substantial compliance for defects in the form of
the attestation clause, Richard likewise failed in this respect.
The statement in the Acknowledgment portion of the subject
last will and testament that it "consists of 7 pages including
the page on which the ratification and acknowledgment are
written" cannot be deemed substantial compliance. The will
actually consists of 8 pages including its
acknowledgment which discrepancy cannot be
explained by mere examination of the will itself but
through the presentation of evidence aliunde.

On this score is the comment of Justice J.B.L. Reyes regarding


the application of Article 809, to wit:

x x x The rule must be limited to disregarding those defects


that can be supplied by an examination of the will itself:
whether all the pages are consecutively numbered; whether
the signatures appear in each and every page; whether the
subscribing witnesses are three or the will was notarized. All
these are facts that the will itself can reveal, and defects or
even omissions concerning them in the attestation clause can
be safely disregarded. But the total number of pages, and
whether all persons required to sign did so in the
presence of each other must substantially appear in the

1
Digested by: Ampog | Ballos | Ebuen | Mahusay | Malicay | Paclibar | Peñamante | Picot | Sinsuat | Sosoban | Teng 

You might also like