Army Institute of Law, Mohali: Juvenile Justice Board
Army Institute of Law, Mohali: Juvenile Justice Board
Army Institute of Law, Mohali: Juvenile Justice Board
The frightful incident of “Nirbhaya Delhi Gang Rape Case1, on December 16, 2012 shocked the
whole nation and many debates were started among legal fraternity and socialists. The main
reason and issue of the debate was the involvement of accused, who was just six months short to
attain the age of 18 years. The involvement of the accused in such a heinous crime of rape
forced the Indian Legislation to introduce a new law and thus, Indian Parliament came up with
a new law which is known as “ Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection), 2015.
The Introduction of the Act has replaced the existing juvenile laws and has introduced some
remarkable changes. One of the remarkable changes is juvenile under the age group of 16 to 18
years should be tried as an adult.
Generally, a “child ”mean a person who has not attain the age of 18 years and is not mature to
understand that what is right and wrong . In modern era, the penal laws of most countries have
adopted the principle of ‘doli incapex2’ which means of knowing that act there are committing is
a crime. The penal laws also states that Only child between the age of seven to twelve age can
be convicted, provided that, the act they have committed is a heinous crime and they have
knowledge and has attained the sufficient knowledge to understand the consequences of their act.
According to sub- section 12 of Section 2 of The Juvenile (Care and Protection) Act, 2015 a
“child” means a person who has not completed eighteen years of age. The Act classifies the term
“child” into two categories: –
1
1998 SCC, Del 879 : (1999) 77 DLT 181
2
Section 82 of IPC states that a child below the age of seven years is doli incapex
“child in conflict with law”3, and
“Child in need of care and protection”.4
The child who has committed an offence and he or she is under the age of 18 years on the date of
commission of the offence is basically called as “child in conflict with law”. The second sub –
category is “child in need of care and protection” means a child ad defined under Section 14 of
the Act.
Children Act, 1960:- Section 2(e) of the Act states “child” means a boy who has not
attained the age of sixteen years or a girl who has not attained the age of eighteen
years.5
United Nations Convention : – The UN Convention on the Rights of Child, 1989
defines that “child” means a human being below the age of eighteen years unless the
law declaration applicable to child , majority is attained earlier.6
In general sense both the term has same meaning but however difference lies in context of
implications in the eyes of law. Minor implies young and teen persons whereas juvenile either
indicates immature person or young offenders.
3
Section 13 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,2015
4
Section 14 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,2015
5
Bare Act , The Children Act , 1960 , Universal Publication , 12th Edition
6
Article 1 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Child, 1989.
History of Juvenile Justice System in India
In present era, a movement for the special treatment of juvenile offenders has started throughout
the world including many developed countries like U.K., U.S.A. This movement has been started
around the 18th century. Prior to this, juvenile offenders were treated as same as other criminal
offenders. And for the same reason, General Assembly of United Nations has adopted a
Convention on the Rights of Child on 20th November 1989. This convention seeks to protect the
best interest of juvenile offenders. The Convention states that to protect the social – reintegration
of juvenile, there shall be no judicial proceeding and court trials against them. The Convention
leads the Indian Legislation to repeal the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 and to make a new law.
Thus, Indian Legislation came up with a new act which was called as “The Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.
The Juvenile Justice, 1986 which repealed the earlier Children Act, 1960, aimed at giving
effect to the guidelines contained in the Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of
Juvenile Justice adopted by the U.N. countries in November 1985.7 The above mentioned Act
consisted of 63 Sections, 7 Chapters and is extended to whole India expect to the State of Jammu
and Kashmir. The primary purpose of the Act was to provide care and protection, treatment,
development and rehabilitation of the neglected juvenile delinquent. The main objectives of the
Act were:-
1. The act basically laid down uniform framework for the juvenile justice in country in
such a way that it protects the right and interest of juvenile.
2. It talks about the machinery and infra – structure for the care, protection treatment,
development and rehabilitation of the juvenile offenders.
3. It set out the basic provisions for the proper and fair administration of criminal justice
in case of heinous crime done by juvenile offenders.
7
Prof. N.V. Paranjape , Criminology , Penology with Victimology, page no 673 ,Central Law Publications,
17th edition,2017
The Act was enacted in year 2000 with aim and intent to provide protection for children. The
mentioned was amended twice – first in the year of 2006 and later in year of 2011 .The
amendment was made to address the gap and loopholes in the implementation.
Further, the increasing number of cases of juvenile crimes in the last recent years and frightful
incident of “Delhi Gang Rape Case” has forced the law makers to come up with the law. The
major drawback of the Act was that it contains ill equipped legal provisions and
malfunctioning juvenile system was also the major reason in preventing the juvenile crimes in
India. The act was replaced soon by The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015.
Like the other countries, India had also made legal provisions that especially and specifically
deals with the rights and protection of juvenile offenders which seeks to tackle the problem of
juvenile delinquency. The Juvenile Justice System in India is made on the basis of three main
assumptions:-
1. young offenders should not be tried in courts , rather they should be corrected in all
the best possible ways,
2. they should not be punished by the courts , but they should get a chance to reform,
3. trial for child in conflict with law8 should be based on non-penal treatment through the
communities based upon the social control agencies for e.g. Observation Homes9 and
Special Homes.10
The aims to consolidate the laws relating to children alleged and found to be in conflict with law
and children in need of care and protection by catering and considering their basic needs through
proper care& protection , development, treatment , social- integration , by adopting a child
friendly approach in the adjudication and disposal of matters in the best interest of children. The
8
Section 2 (13) of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection) Act , 2015
9
Section 47 of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection) Act , 2015
10
Section 48 of the Juvenile Justice ( Care and Protection) Act , 2015
act also focuses on rehabilitation of juvenile offenders through various child care houses and
institutions. The most important subjects of the Act are as follows:-
Claim of Juvenility
The very first and most debatable question among the legal fraternity and socialists is the “claim
of juvenility”. The claim of Juvenility is to be decided by Juvenile Justice Board. The Board has
to decide the claim of juvenility before the court proceedings but the claim of juvenility can be
raised before the court at any stage of proceedings and even after the disposal of the matter by
the Board .The Board had to consider Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice Rules, 2007 in order to
determine the claim of juvenility. In case of KulaiIbrahim v. State of Coimbatore11 it was
observed by the Court that accused has right to raise the question of juvenility at any point of
time during trial or even after the disposal of the case under the Section 9 of Juvenile Justice Act
, 2015.
In case of Deoki Nandan Dayma v. State of Uttar Pradesh12 the court held that entry in the
register of school mentioning the date of birth of student is admissible evidence in determining
the age of juvenile or to show that whether the accused is juvenile or child.
Again in the case of Satbir Singh& others v. State of Haryana,13 Supreme Court again
reiterated that for the purpose of determination whether accused is juvenile or not, the date of
birth which is recorded in the school records shall be taken into consideration by Juvenile Justice
Board.
In case of Krishna Bhagwan v. State of Bihar14 the court stated that for the purpose of trial
under Juvenile Justice Board, the relevant date for the considering the age of juvenile should be
on which the offence has been committed.
11
AIR 2014 SC 2726
12
1997 i0 SCC 525
13
AIR 2005 SC 3549
14
AIR 1989
But later in case of Arnit Das v. State of Bihar15, the Supreme Court overruled its previous
decision and held that date to decide in claim of juvenility should be the date on which the
accused is brought before the competent authority.
There shall be a constitution of Board for the purpose of inquiry and hearing in the matters of
juvenile in conflict with law.16
The Board shall consist of Principal Magistrate and two social workers, among whom one should
be a woman17. The Act provides that under no circumstances the Board can regulate and operate
from regular court premises. The decision taken by the Principal Magistrate shall be final.18
1. Special Procedure of Juvenile Justice Board :- The Act has provided the procedure
against the juvenile offender .Following are the main special procedure –
2. The proceedings cannot be initiated on a complaint registered by the police or citizen
3. The hearing must be informal and should be strictly confidential.
4. The offenders should be kept under Observation Home after detention.
5. The trial of juvenile in conflict with law shall be conducted by Lady Magistrate.
6. A child in conflict with law may be produced before an individual member of the
Board, when Board is not sitting.19
Researches and Studies show that they are various causes of juvenile delinquency in India. Every
person has different behavioral patterns so as in case with children also. The behavior patterns
develop in early childhood and at early stage it is very difficult to identify any kind of behavior.
But as soon as , child grows up comes out to real world , behavior patterns changes from time to
15
AIR 2000 SC 748
16
Section 4 of Juvenile Justice( Care and Protection) Act , 2015.
17
Section 4(2) of Juvenile Justice( Care and Protection) Act , 2015
18
Section 5 of Juvenile Justice( Care and Protection) Act , 2015
19
Section 7(2) 0f the Juvenile Justice( Care and Protection) Act, 2015
time and many circumstances or situation may arose the delinquent behavior in them .
Following are the some of the causes of Juvenile Delinquency:-
20
Dr. S.S. Srivastava, page no 319, Central Law Agency, 3rd Edition, 2007.
6. Modern Life Style: – The rapidly changing society patterns and modern living style,
makes it very difficult for children and adolescents to adjust themselves to the new
ways of lifestyle. They are confronted with problems of culture conflicts and are
unable to differentiate between right and wrong.21
The Constitution of India is considered as the fundamental law of India. Constitution provides
rights and duties of citizens. It also provides provision for the working of the government
machineries. Constitution in Part III has provided Fundamental Rights for its citizens in the same
manner in its Part IV it has provided Directive Principles of State Policies (DPSP) which acts as
general guidelines in framing government policies. Constitution has provided some basic rights
and provisions especially for the welfare of children. Like: –
1. Right to free and compulsory elementary education for all the children under the age
of 6 to 14 years.( Article 21A)
2. Right to be protected from any hazardous employment under the age of fourteen age.
(Article 24)
3. Right to be protected from being abused in any form by an adult. (Article 39(e)).
4. Right to be protected from human trafficking and forced bonded labor system.( Article
(Article 39)
5. Right to be provided with good nutrition and proper standard of living.(Article 47)
6. Article 15(3) of the Constitution of India provides special powers to State to make any
special laws for the upliftment and the betterment of children and women.
Therefore, the law makers while drafting the Juvenile Act, 2015 has considered all the necessary
provisions laid down by the Constitution so that child’s rights are protected in all the possible
ways.
21
Prof. N.V. Paranjape, Criminology, Penology with Victimology, page no 665, Central Law Publications, 17th
edition , 2017.
This is for the same reason that Chapter IV of the Act lays down the provisions for betterment of
the juveniles and has focused on the Reformation and Rehabilitation of Juveniles in all the
possible circumstances.
Juvenile Justice is a legal framework which defines justice for juvenile under the Indian Legal
System. The system is giving a special treatment and protection to juvenile delinquency
.Juvenile Delinquency means a crime committed by youth who is under the age of 18 years. At
present, everyone knows that there is an increasing rate of juvenile crimes and this increasing
rate is creating a debatable issue of age determination. Age determination is considered as one of
the most important factor to determine the maturity level of the accused. The increasing crime
rate is raising a question that whether the juvenile can be tried as an adult or not? The act itself
answer to the question that no juvenile offender who comes under the definition of “ child with
conflict with law” as defined under sub – section 13 of Section 2 of the Act shall not be tried
as adult and shall sent to Child Care Centre or any Rehabilitation Centre( till the offender attain
the age of 21 years and then he or she may shifted to the jail or prison).
Thus, the present Juvenile Law in India, considers Age Determination as a paramount
importance to find out whether the offender falls under the purview of Juvenile Justice Act.
According to the Act, the maximum tenure of punishment which can be given to the juvenile
offenders is three years and this punishment is valid for heinous crime also. In case of an adult
offender, the maximum punishment which can be given is 7 years or life imprisonment or death
penalty. But, the Act, in case of juvenile offenders believe on Reformation of juvenile as much
as possible. The reformation type of punishment under the Act includes: – Sending juvenile to
Rehabilitation Centers , Juvenile Schools or making them involve in various program headed by
government or NGO’s.
In the present scenario, there is no need to give such a minor kind of punishment for a heinous
and harsh offence just because of Age determination or Age factor . Rape is Rape; one can’t
walk way taking a plea of age factor or mental incapacity or mental unfitness.
Thus, the existing law in the name of Age determination or Age Consent is not creating a
deterrent effect on the anti – social behavior of youth. Juvenile offenders are in believe that
committing heinous crime is no issue as they will get away very little or no punishment in name
of reformation.
The present juvenile system in India is created on believe that juvenile offenders can be
reformed and rehabilitated , sending them to bars or prisons will going to reaffirm their status
and identity as “criminals”. Now the question arises is that there is no guarantee that juvenile
offenders will get reformed and will not show their anti – social behavior again.
The act is totaling focusing on the reformation rather than penalization. Penalization will
definitely create a deterrent effect on the juvenile and increasing rate of crime by juvenile will
slow down.
Conclusion
The increasing rates of juvenile crime in India in very concerning issue and need to be focused
upon. Although government has laid various legislation and rules to stop the incidents of
juvenile crimes but the present laws on juveniles is not creating a deterrent effect on the
juveniles and thus the results are not fruitful and legislative intent is not accomplishing .